1 ;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using
2 ;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g.
5 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
8 ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
9 ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
12 ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
13 ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
14 ;;;; more information.
16 (cl:in-package
:cl-user
)
18 ;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
19 (when (eq sb-ext
:*evaluator-mode
* :interpret
)
20 (sb-ext:exit
:code
104))
23 ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
25 (defvar *p
* (namestring *load-truename
*))
27 ;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that
28 ;;; we actually export.
30 ;;; Return the debug arglist of the function object FUN as a list, or
31 ;;; punt with :UNKNOWN.
32 (defun get-arglist (fun)
33 (declare (type function fun
))
34 ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
35 (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun
)
36 (#.sb-vm
:simple-fun-header-widetag
37 (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun
))
38 (#.sb-vm
:closure-header-widetag
(get-arglist
39 (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun
)))
40 ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme
41 ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
43 ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
44 ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just
45 ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
46 ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
47 ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
50 (if (typep fun
'sb-eval
::interpreted-function
)
51 (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun
)
56 (defun zoop (zeep &key beep
)
58 (assert (equal (get-arglist #'zoop
) '(zeep &key beep
)))
60 ;;; Check some predefined functions too.
62 ;;; (We don't know exactly what the arguments are, e.g. the first
63 ;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or
64 ;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct
65 ;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.)
66 (with-test (:name
:predefined-functions-1
)
67 (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym
) (get-arglist #'print
)
68 (assert (symbolp object-sym
))
69 (assert (eql &optional-sym
'&optional
))
70 (assert (symbolp stream-sym
))))
71 (with-test (:name
:predefined-functions-2
)
72 (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym
&rest-sym format-args-sym
)
73 (get-arglist #'format
)
74 (assert (symbolp dest-sym
))
75 (assert (symbolp control-sym
))
76 (assert (eql &rest-sym
'&rest
))
77 (assert (symbolp format-args-sym
))))
79 ;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the
80 ;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own),
81 ;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any
82 ;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call
83 ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere.
84 (defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs
&key
(allow-stunted nil
) details
)
85 (labels ((args-equal (want real
)
86 (cond ((eq '&rest
(car want
))
90 ((or (eq '?
(car want
)) (equal (car want
) (car real
)))
91 (args-equal (cdr want
) (cdr real
)))
97 ((error (lambda (condition)
98 ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
100 (sb-debug::map-backtrace
102 (multiple-value-bind (name args info
)
103 (sb-debug::frame-call frame
#+nil
#+nil
104 :replace-dynamic-extent-objects t
)
106 (push (list (cons name args
) info
) full-backtrace
)
107 (push (cons name args
) full-backtrace
)))))
109 (setf full-backtrace
(nreverse full-backtrace
))
110 (let ((backtrace (if details
111 (member (caaar frame-specs
)
115 (member (caar frame-specs
)
120 (setf result condition
)
123 (format t
"~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
127 ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
130 (unless (or (not spec
)
133 (and (args-equal (car spec
)
135 (equal (cdr spec
) (cdr frame
)))
137 (print (list :spec spec
:frame frame
))
139 (and (equal (car spec
) (car frame
))
140 (args-equal (cdr spec
)
142 (print (list :wanted spec
:got frame
))
147 ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
148 ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
149 ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
150 ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
151 (unless (find (if details
152 '((sb-impl::toplevel-init
) ())
153 '(sb-impl::toplevel-init
))
156 (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace
))
158 (return-from outer-handler
))))))
159 (funcall test-function
)))
162 (defvar *undefined-function-frame
*
164 '("undefined function"))
166 ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
167 ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
168 ;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect
169 ;;; a stunted stack can result from the tail call variant.)
171 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
172 (#:undefined-function
42))
174 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
175 (#:undefined-function
42))
177 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
180 (with-test (:name
(:undefined-function
:bug-346
)
181 ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably
182 ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid
183 ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame.
184 ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details.
185 :fails-on
'(or :alpha
:sparc
:mips
186 (and :x86-64
:freebsd
)))
187 (assert (verify-backtrace
188 (lambda () (test #'optimized
))
189 (list *undefined-function-frame
*
190 (list `(flet test
:in
,*p
*) #'optimized
)))))
192 ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
193 ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
194 (with-test (:name
(:undefined-function
:bug-353
))
195 (assert (verify-backtrace
196 (lambda () (test #'not-optimized
))
197 (list *undefined-function-frame
*
198 (list `(flet not-optimized
:in
,*p
*))
199 (list `(flet test
:in
,*p
*) #'not-optimized
))))))
201 (with-test (:name
:backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait
202 :skipped-on
'(not :sb-thread
)
203 ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes
204 ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to
205 ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is
206 ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now.
207 :fails-on
`(or (and :x86
:linux
)
209 (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex
))
210 (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue
)))
211 (assert (verify-backtrace
213 (sb-thread:with-mutex
(m)
214 (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c)
217 (sb-thread:condition-wait q m
)))))
218 `((sb-thread:condition-wait
,q
,m
:timeout nil
))))))
220 ;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
221 ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
222 ;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
223 ;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
224 ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
225 ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
228 ;;; Disabling tail call elimination on this will probably ensure that
229 ;;; the return value (to the flet or the enclosing top level form) is
230 ;;; more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM with the current spaces on OS X.
231 ;;; Enabling it might catch other problems, so do it anyway.
233 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
236 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
239 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
241 (with-test (:name
(:divide-by-zero
:bug-346
)
242 :fails-on
:alpha
) ; bug 346
243 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized
))
245 (list `(flet test
:in
,*p
*) #'optimized
)))))
246 (with-test (:name
(:divide-by-zero
:bug-356
)
247 :fails-on
:alpha
) ; bug 356
248 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized
))
250 `((flet not-optimized
:in
,*p
*))
251 (list `(flet test
:in
,*p
*) #'not-optimized
))))))
253 (with-test (:name
(:throw
:no-such-tag
)
260 (throw 'no-such-tag t
))
261 (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test
'((throw-test))))))
263 (defun bug-308926 (x)
271 (with-test (:name
:bug-308926
)
272 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13))
273 '(((flet bar
:in bug-308926
) 13)
274 (bug-308926 &rest t
)))))
276 ;;; Test backtrace through assembly routines
278 (macrolet ((test (predicate fun
280 (find-symbol (format nil
"TWO-ARG-~A" fun
)
282 (let ((test-name (make-symbol (format nil
"TEST-~A" fun
))))
283 `(flet ((,test-name
(x y
)
284 ;; make sure it's not in tail position
286 (with-test (:name
(:bug-800343
,fun
))
287 (assert (verify-backtrace
289 (eval `(funcall ,#',test-name
42 t
)))
293 '(("no debug information for frame")))
294 ((flet ,test-name
:in
,*p
*) 42 t
))))))))
295 (test-predicates (&rest functions
)
296 `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function)
299 `(test t
,function
)))
301 (test-functions (&rest functions
)
302 `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function)
304 `(test nil
,@function
)
305 `(test nil
,function
)))
307 (test-predicates = < >)
308 (test-functions + -
* /
310 (logand sb-kernel
:two-arg-and
)
311 (logior sb-kernel
:two-arg-ior
)
312 (logxor sb-kernel
:two-arg-xor
)))
314 ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
319 (with-test (:name
:xep-too-many-arguments
)
320 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6))
321 '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?
)))))
323 (defmacro defbt
(n ll
&body body
)
324 ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the
325 ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be
326 ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps
327 ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that.
333 (defun ,(intern (format nil
"BT.~A.1" n
)) ,ll
335 ;; no arguments saved
336 (defun ,(intern (format nil
"BT.~A.2" n
)) ,ll
337 (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
339 ;; no lambda-list saved
340 (defun ,(intern (format nil
"BT.~A.3" n
)) ,ll
341 (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
350 (defbt 3 (&key
(key (oops)))
353 ;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen
354 (defbt 4 (&optional opt
)
355 (list (error "error")))
357 (defbt 5 (&optional
(opt (oops)))
361 (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x
))
363 (with-test (:name
:bug-354
)
364 (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
366 (((bug-354 &rest
) (:tl
:external
)) 354)))))
367 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354)))))
369 ;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces
370 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:tl-xep
))
371 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
372 '(((namestring) (:tl
:external
)))
374 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
377 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:more-processor
))
378 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key
))
379 '(((bt.1.1 :key
) (:more
:optional
)))
381 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key
))
382 '(((bt.1.2 ?
) (:more
:optional
)))
384 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key
))
385 '(((bt.1.3 &rest
) (:more
:optional
)))
387 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key
))
389 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key
))
391 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key
))
394 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:xep
))
395 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.1
396 '(((bt.2.1) (:external
)))
398 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.2
399 '(((bt.2.2 &rest
) (:external
)))
401 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.3
402 '(((bt.2.3 &rest
) (:external
)))
404 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.1
406 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.2
408 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2.3
411 ;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming
412 ;;; these functions used to have sb-c::varargs-entry debug names for their
414 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:varargs-entry
))
415 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.1
416 '((bt.3.1 :key nil
))))
417 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.2
419 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.3
421 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.1
422 '((bt.3.1 :key nil
))))
423 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.2
425 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3.3
428 ;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming
429 ;;; these functions used to have sb-c::hairy-args-processor debug names for
430 ;;; their main lambda.
431 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:hairy-args-processor
))
432 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.1
434 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.2
436 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.3
438 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.1
440 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.2
442 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4.3
446 (with-test (:name
(:backtrace
:optional-processor
))
447 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.1
448 '(((bt.5.1) (:optional
)))
450 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.2
451 '(((bt.5.2 &rest
) (:optional
)))
453 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.3
454 '(((bt.5.3 &rest
) (:optional
)))
456 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.1
458 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.2
460 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5.3
463 (write-line "//compile nil")
464 (defvar *compile-nil-error
* (compile nil
'(lambda (x) (cons (when x
(error "oops")) nil
))))
465 (defvar *compile-nil-non-tc
* (compile nil
'(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error
* y
) nil
))))
466 (with-test (:name
(:compile nil
))
467 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc
* 13))
468 `(((lambda (x) :in
,*p
*) 13)
469 ((lambda (y) :in
,*p
*) 13)))))
471 (with-test (:name
:clos-slot-typecheckfun-named
)
475 (eval `(locally (declare (optimize safety
))
476 (defclass clos-typecheck-test
()
477 ((slot :type fixnum
)))
478 (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'clos-typecheck-test
) 'slot
) t
))))
479 '(((sb-pcl::slot-typecheck fixnum
) t
)))))
481 (with-test (:name
:clos-emf-named
)
486 (defmethod clos-emf-named-test ((x symbol
)) x
)
487 (defmethod clos-emf-named-test :before
(x) (assert x
))
488 (clos-emf-named-test nil
))))
489 '(((sb-pcl::emf clos-emf-named-test
) ? ? nil
)))))
491 (with-test (:name
:bug-310173
)
493 (let* ((names '(a b
))
494 (req (loop repeat n collect
(pop names
))))
496 `(lambda (,@req
&rest rest
)
497 (let ((* *)) ; no tail-call
498 (apply '/ ,@req rest
)))))))
500 (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
501 (funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0))
502 `((sb-kernel:two-arg-
/ 10/11 0)
504 ((lambda (&rest rest
) :in
,*p
*) 10 11 0))))
506 (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
507 (funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0))
508 `((sb-kernel:two-arg-
/ 10/11 0)
510 ((lambda (a &rest rest
) :in
,*p
*) 10 11 0))))
512 (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
513 (funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0))
514 `((sb-kernel:two-arg-
/ 10/11 0)
516 ((lambda (a b
&rest rest
) :in
,*p
*) 10 11 0))))))
523 (defun trace-fact (n)
526 (* n
(trace-fact (1- n
)))))
528 (with-test (:name
(trace :simple
))
529 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output
*)
531 (assert (eq 'ok
(trace-this)))
533 (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out
))
534 (assert (search "returned OK" out
))))
537 ;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are
538 ;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image
539 ;;; on that platform.
540 (with-test (:name
(trace :encapsulate nil
)
541 :fails-on
'(or (and :ppc
(not :linux
)) :sparc
:mips
)
542 :broken-on
'(or :darwin
:sunos
))
543 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output
*)
544 (trace trace-this
:encapsulate nil
)
545 (assert (eq 'ok
(trace-this)))
547 (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out
))
548 (assert (search "returned OK" out
))))
550 (with-test (:name
(trace-recursive :encapsulate nil
)
551 :fails-on
'(or (and :ppc
(not :linux
)) :sparc
:mips
:sunos
)
552 :broken-on
'(or :darwin
(and :x86
:sunos
)))
553 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output
*)
554 (trace trace-fact
:encapsulate nil
)
555 (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5)))
557 (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out
))
558 (assert (search "returned 1" out
))
559 (assert (search "returned 120" out
))))
561 (defun trace-and-fmakunbound-this (x)
564 (with-test (:name
:bug-667657
)
565 (trace trace-and-fmakunbound-this
)
566 (fmakunbound 'trace-and-fmakunbound-this
)
568 (assert (not (trace))))
570 (with-test (:name
:bug-414
)
571 (handler-bind ((warning #'error
))
572 (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp"))
573 (disassemble 'bug-414
)))
575 (with-test (:name
:bug-310175
:fails-on
'(not :stack-allocatable-lists
))
576 ;; KLUDGE: Not all DX-enabled platforms DX CONS, and the compiler
577 ;; transforms two-arg-LIST* (and one-arg-LIST) to CONS. Therefore,
578 ;; use two-arg-LIST, which should get through to VOP LIST, and thus
579 ;; stack-allocate on a predictable set of machines.
580 (let ((dx-arg (list t t
)))
581 (declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg
))
582 (flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x)
583 (declare (optimize (debug 2)))
584 (prog1 (sb-debug:list-backtrace
:count
10)
585 (assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x
)))))
586 (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace
))
587 (assert (member-if (lambda (frame)
590 (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace
:in
) (butlast (car frame
)))
591 (notany #'sb-debug
::stack-allocated-p
(cdr frame
))))
592 (dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg
))))))
594 (with-test (:name
:bug-795245
)
602 (sb-debug:print-backtrace
:count
100
603 :stream
(make-broadcast-stream))
605 (throw 'done
:error
))
607 (throw 'done
:ok
))))))
608 (apply '/= nil
1 2 nil
))))))
610 ;;;; test infinite error protection
612 (defmacro nest-errors
(n-levels error-form
)
614 `(handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition)
615 (declare (ignore condition
))
617 (nest-errors ,(1- n-levels
) ,error-form
))
620 (defun erroring-debugger-hook (condition old-debugger-hook
)
621 (let ((*debugger-hook
* old-debugger-hook
))
622 (format t
"recursive condition: ~A~%" condition
) (force-output)
623 (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition
)))
625 (defun test-inifinite-error-protection ()
626 ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used
627 ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that
628 ;; it is tested only once
629 (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--")
630 (let ((*debugger-hook
* #'erroring-debugger-hook
))
632 (let ((error-counter 0)
633 (*terminal-io
* (make-broadcast-stream)))
637 (catch 'sb-impl
::toplevel-catcher
638 (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s"
639 (incf error-counter
)))
641 (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--"))
643 (with-test (:name infinite-error-protection
)
645 (test-inifinite-error-protection))
647 (with-test (:name
(infinite-error-protection :thread
)
648 :skipped-on
'(not :sb-thread
))
650 (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread
#'test-inifinite-error-protection
)))
651 (loop while
(sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread
))))
653 ;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled
656 ;;;; test some limitations of MAKE-LISP-OBJ
658 ;;; Older GENCGC systems had a bug in the pointer validation used by
659 ;;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ that made SIMPLE-FUN objects always fail to
661 (with-test (:name
(make-lisp-obj :simple-funs
))
662 (sb-sys:without-gcing
663 (assert (eq #'identity
664 (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj
665 (sb-kernel:get-lisp-obj-address
668 ;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity
669 ;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space".
670 (with-test (:name
(make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation
))
671 ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus
672 ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an
673 ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus
674 ;; object within an area of unboxed storage (a vector) in static
675 ;; space. We'll make it a simple object, (CONS 0 0), which has an
676 ;; in-memory representation of two consecutive zero words. We
677 ;; allocate a three-word vector so that we can guarantee a
678 ;; double-word aligned double-word of zeros no matter what happens
679 ;; with the vector-data-offset (currently double-word aligned).
680 (let* ((memory (sb-int:make-static-vector
3 :element-type
`(unsigned-byte ,sb-vm
:n-word-bits
)
682 (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int
(sb-kernel::vector-sap memory
)))
683 (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm
:lowtag-mask
) sb-vm
:lowtag-mask
))
684 (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm
:list-pointer-lowtag
)))
685 (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p
)
686 (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil
)
687 (declare (ignore object
))
688 (assert (not valid-p
)))))
690 (defun test-debugger (control form
&rest targets
)
691 (let ((out (make-string-output-stream))
695 (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!")
696 (let* ((*debug-io
* (make-two-way-stream
697 (make-string-input-stream control
)
698 (make-broadcast-stream out
#+nil
*standard-output
*)))
699 ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT*
700 (*error-output
* *debug-io
*)
701 (*invoke-debugger-hook
* nil
))
702 (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger
))
706 (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test.")))
707 ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise
708 ;; it could swallow our asserts!
709 (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out
))
710 (loop for line
= (read-line s nil
)
714 (format *error-output
* "Got: ~A~%" line
)
715 (let ((match (pop targets
)))
717 ;; Whatever, till the next line matches.
718 (let ((text (pop targets
)))
720 (format *error-output
* "Looking for: ~A~%" text
)
721 (unless (search text line
)
723 (push match targets
)))
724 (unless (search match line
)
725 (format *error-output
* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line
)
727 ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted
729 (error "Missed: ~S" targets
))
730 (assert (not oops
))))
732 (with-test (:name
(:debugger
:source
1))
738 (defun this-will-break (x)
739 (declare (optimize debug
))
751 "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)"
756 (with-test (:name
(:debugger
:source
2))
761 `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3)))
762 (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont
)
763 (print x
(make-broadcast-stream))
766 (funcall cont
(1- x
) cont
)))))
773 "source: (ERROR \"~%foo\")"
777 "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)"
780 (with-test (:name
(disassemble :high-debug-eval
))
781 (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x)
782 (declare (optimize debug
))
784 (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
786 (let ((*error-output
* oopses
))
787 (with-output-to-string (*standard-output
*)
788 (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled
)))))
789 (with-input-from-string (s disassembly
)
790 (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED"
792 (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses
)))
793 (unless (zerop (length problems
))
796 (defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x)
797 (declare (optimize debug
))
800 (with-test (:name
(disassemble :high-debug-load
))
801 (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
803 (let ((*error-output
* oopses
))
804 (with-output-to-string (*standard-output
*)
805 (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled
)))))
806 (with-input-from-string (s disassembly
)
807 (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED"
809 (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses
)))
810 (unless (zerop (length problems
))
813 (defgeneric gf-dispatch-test
/gf
(x y
)
816 (defun gf-dispatch-test/f
(z)
817 (gf-dispatch-test/gf z
))
819 (with-test (:name
:gf-dispatch-backtrace
)
821 (gf-dispatch-test/gf
1 1)
822 ;; Wrong argument count
823 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (gf-dispatch-test/f
42))
824 '(((sb-pcl::gf-dispatch gf-dispatch-test
/gf
) 42)))))
826 (write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")