1 Comments to the Reviewer 1
3 Foremostly, I would like to thank for pointing out the problems in
6 The main problem was the excessive use of footnotes and lot of one
9 We have cut down the number of footnotes to maximum of 2 footnotes per
10 page. Furthermore, we have reformated/merged the one-sentence paragraphs
11 and cut down the use of colons & semicolons as well, hoping to make our
15 > The References contain many errors:
16 > - Use of "et al." rather than full author lists.
17 > - Some years at start, some years at end.
18 > - Some years bracketed, some not bracketed.
19 > - Other formatting errors, etc.
21 I fully aggree, that the References formating is not optimal in every
22 regard, this is however caused by the official IEEE Transactions
23 bibliography style. Different documents (Book, Article, Electronic,
24 Tech report, ..) have different position (and bracketing) of the year
25 field. I took special care to make sure that all the fields in all the
26 references are present (if possible), and I am afraid I cannot make it
27 any better than the current version.
29 The use of et.al. in the paper refers mostly to online project with at
30 least partial public contribution, where gathering list of all the authors
31 (likely very long) is very complicated (if possible). We use full author
35 Comments to the Reviewer 2
37 We have fixed the typo. Thank you.