2005-12-29 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
[official-gcc.git] / gcc / ada / binde.adb
blobacba7846418ccddb74b2595068af6b6f38f7de5b
1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 -- --
3 -- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
4 -- --
5 -- B I N D E --
6 -- --
7 -- B o d y --
8 -- --
9 -- Copyright (C) 1992-2005, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
10 -- --
11 -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
12 -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
13 -- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
14 -- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15 -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16 -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
17 -- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
18 -- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
19 -- to the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, --
20 -- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. --
21 -- --
22 -- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
23 -- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
24 -- --
25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 with Binderr; use Binderr;
28 with Butil; use Butil;
29 with Debug; use Debug;
30 with Fname; use Fname;
31 with Lib; use Lib;
32 with Namet; use Namet;
33 with Opt; use Opt;
34 with Output; use Output;
35 with Targparm; use Targparm;
37 package body Binde is
39 -- The following data structures are used to represent the graph that is
40 -- used to determine the elaboration order (using a topological sort).
42 -- The following structures are used to record successors. If A is a
43 -- successor of B in this table, it means that A must be elaborated
44 -- before B is elaborated.
46 type Successor_Id is new Nat;
47 -- Identification of single successor entry
49 No_Successor : constant Successor_Id := 0;
50 -- Used to indicate end of list of successors
52 type Elab_All_Id is new Nat;
53 -- Identification of Elab_All entry link
55 No_Elab_All_Link : constant Elab_All_Id := 0;
56 -- Used to indicate end of list
58 -- Succ_Reason indicates the reason for a particular elaboration link
60 type Succ_Reason is
61 (Withed,
62 -- After directly with's Before, so the spec of Before must be
63 -- elaborated before After is elaborated.
65 Elab,
66 -- After directly mentions Before in a pragma Elaborate, so the
67 -- body of Before must be elaborate before After is elaborated.
69 Elab_All,
70 -- After either mentions Before directly in a pragma Elaborate_All,
71 -- or mentions a third unit, X, which itself requires that Before be
72 -- elaborated before unit X is elaborated. The Elab_All_Link list
73 -- traces the dependencies in the latter case.
75 Elab_All_Desirable,
76 -- This is just like Elab_All, except that the elaborate all was not
77 -- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
78 -- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
80 Elab_Desirable,
81 -- This is just like Elab, except that the elaborate was not
82 -- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
83 -- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
85 Spec_First);
86 -- After is a body, and Before is the corresponding spec
88 -- Successor_Link contains the information for one link
90 type Successor_Link is record
91 Before : Unit_Id;
92 -- Predecessor unit
94 After : Unit_Id;
95 -- Successor unit
97 Next : Successor_Id;
98 -- Next successor on this list
100 Reason : Succ_Reason;
101 -- Reason for this link
103 Elab_Body : Boolean;
104 -- Set True if this link is needed for the special Elaborate_Body
105 -- processing described below.
107 Reason_Unit : Unit_Id;
108 -- For Reason = Elab, or Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, records the unit
109 -- containing the pragma leading to the link.
111 Elab_All_Link : Elab_All_Id;
112 -- If Reason = Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, then this points to the
113 -- first elment in a list of Elab_All entries that record the with
114 -- chain leading resulting in this particular dependency.
116 end record;
118 -- Note on handling of Elaborate_Body. Basically, if we have a pragma
119 -- Elaborate_Body in a unit, it means that the spec and body have to
120 -- be handled as a single entity from the point of view of determining
121 -- an elaboration order. What we do is to essentially remove the body
122 -- from consideration completely, and transfer all its links (other
123 -- than the spec link) to the spec. Then when then the spec gets chosen,
124 -- we choose the body right afterwards. We mark the links that get moved
125 -- from the body to the spec by setting their Elab_Body flag True, so
126 -- that we can understand what is going on!
128 Succ_First : constant := 1;
130 package Succ is new Table.Table (
131 Table_Component_Type => Successor_Link,
132 Table_Index_Type => Successor_Id,
133 Table_Low_Bound => Succ_First,
134 Table_Initial => 500,
135 Table_Increment => 200,
136 Table_Name => "Succ");
138 -- For the case of Elaborate_All, the following table is used to record
139 -- chains of with relationships that lead to the Elab_All link. These
140 -- are used solely for diagnostic purposes
142 type Elab_All_Entry is record
143 Needed_By : Unit_Name_Type;
144 -- Name of unit from which referencing unit was with'ed or otherwise
145 -- needed as a result of Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable.
147 Next_Elab : Elab_All_Id;
148 -- Link to next entry on chain (No_Elab_All_Link marks end of list)
149 end record;
151 package Elab_All_Entries is new Table.Table (
152 Table_Component_Type => Elab_All_Entry,
153 Table_Index_Type => Elab_All_Id,
154 Table_Low_Bound => 1,
155 Table_Initial => 2000,
156 Table_Increment => 200,
157 Table_Name => "Elab_All_Entries");
159 -- A Unit_Node record is built for each active unit
161 type Unit_Node_Record is record
163 Successors : Successor_Id;
164 -- Pointer to list of links for successor nodes
166 Num_Pred : Int;
167 -- Number of predecessors for this unit. Normally non-negative, but
168 -- can go negative in the case of units chosen by the diagnose error
169 -- procedure (when cycles are being removed from the graph).
171 Nextnp : Unit_Id;
172 -- Forward pointer for list of units with no predecessors
174 Elab_Order : Nat;
175 -- Position in elaboration order (zero = not placed yet)
177 Visited : Boolean;
178 -- Used in computing transitive closure for elaborate all and
179 -- also in locating cycles and paths in the diagnose routines.
181 Elab_Position : Natural;
182 -- Initialized to zero. Set non-zero when a unit is chosen and
183 -- placed in the elaboration order. The value represents the
184 -- ordinal position in the elaboration order.
186 end record;
188 package UNR is new Table.Table (
189 Table_Component_Type => Unit_Node_Record,
190 Table_Index_Type => Unit_Id,
191 Table_Low_Bound => First_Unit_Entry,
192 Table_Initial => 500,
193 Table_Increment => 200,
194 Table_Name => "UNR");
196 No_Pred : Unit_Id;
197 -- Head of list of items with no predecessors
199 Num_Left : Int;
200 -- Number of entries not yet dealt with
202 Cur_Unit : Unit_Id;
203 -- Current unit, set by Gather_Dependencies, and picked up in Build_Link
204 -- to set the Reason_Unit field of the created dependency link.
206 Num_Chosen : Natural := 0;
207 -- Number of units chosen in the elaboration order so far
209 -----------------------
210 -- Local Subprograms --
211 -----------------------
213 function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
214 -- U1 and U2 are both permitted candidates for selection as the next unit
215 -- to be elaborated. This function determines whether U1 is a better choice
216 -- than U2, i.e. should be elaborated in preference to U2, based on a set
217 -- of heuristics that establish a friendly and predictable order (see body
218 -- for details). The result is True if U1 is a better choice than U2, and
219 -- False if it is a worse choice, or there is no preference between them.
221 procedure Build_Link
222 (Before : Unit_Id;
223 After : Unit_Id;
224 R : Succ_Reason;
225 Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link);
226 -- Establish a successor link, Before must be elaborated before After,
227 -- and the reason for the link is R. Ea_Id is the contents to be placed
228 -- in the Elab_All_Link of the entry.
230 procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id);
231 -- Chosen is the next entry chosen in the elaboration order. This
232 -- procedure updates all data structures appropriately.
234 function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
235 pragma Inline (Corresponding_Body);
236 -- Given a unit which is a spec for which there is a separate body,
237 -- return the unit id of the body. It is an error to call this routine
238 -- with a unit that is not a spec, or which does not have a separate body.
240 function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
241 pragma Inline (Corresponding_Spec);
242 -- Given a unit which is a body for which there is a separate spec,
243 -- return the unit id of the spec. It is an error to call this routine
244 -- with a unit that is not a body, or which does not have a separate spec.
246 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
247 -- Called when no elaboration order can be found. Outputs an appropriate
248 -- diagnosis of the problem, and then abandons the bind.
250 procedure Elab_All_Links
251 (Before : Unit_Id;
252 After : Unit_Id;
253 Reason : Succ_Reason;
254 Link : Elab_All_Id);
255 -- Used to compute the transitive closure of elaboration links for an
256 -- Elaborate_All pragma (Reason = Elab_All) or for an indication of
257 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable (Reason = Elab_All_Desirable). Unit After has
258 -- a pragma Elaborate_All or the front end has determined that a reference
259 -- probably requires Elaborate_All is required, and unit Before must be
260 -- previously elaborated. First a link is built making sure that unit
261 -- Before is elaborated before After, then a recursive call ensures that
262 -- we also build links for any units needed by Before (i.e. these units
263 -- must/should also be elaborated before After). Link is used to build
264 -- a chain of Elab_All_Entries to explain the reason for a link. The
265 -- value passed is the chain so far.
267 procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id);
268 -- Given a successor link, outputs an error message of the form
269 -- "& must be elaborated before & ..." where ... is the reason.
271 procedure Gather_Dependencies;
272 -- Compute dependencies, building the Succ and UNR tables
274 function Make_Elab_Entry
275 (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
276 Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id;
277 -- Make an Elab_All_Entries table entry with the given Unam and Link
279 function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id;
280 -- This function uses the Info field set in the names table to obtain
281 -- the unit Id of a unit, given its name id value.
283 function Worse_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
284 -- This is like Better_Choice, and has the same interface, but returns
285 -- true if U1 is a worse choice than U2 in the sense of the -h (horrible
286 -- elaboration order) switch. We still have to obey Ada rules, so it is
287 -- not quite the direct inverse of Better_Choice.
289 procedure Write_Dependencies;
290 -- Write out dependencies (called only if appropriate option is set)
292 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id);
293 -- If the reason for the link S is Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable,
294 -- then this routine will output the "needed by" explanation chain.
296 -------------------
297 -- Better_Choice --
298 -------------------
300 function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
302 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
303 -- Determines if given unit is a body
305 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
306 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
307 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
309 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
310 begin
311 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
312 or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
313 end Body_Unit;
315 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
316 begin
317 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
318 and then UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
319 end Waiting_Body;
321 -- Start of processing for Better_Choice
323 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
324 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
326 begin
327 -- Prefer a waiting body to any other case
329 if Waiting_Body (U1) and not Waiting_Body (U2) then
330 return True;
332 elsif Waiting_Body (U2) and not Waiting_Body (U1) then
333 return False;
335 -- Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
337 elsif Units.Table (U1).Predefined
338 and not Units.Table (U2).Predefined
339 then
340 return True;
342 elsif Units.Table (U2).Predefined
343 and not Units.Table (U1).Predefined
344 then
345 return False;
347 -- Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
349 elsif Units.Table (U1).Internal
350 and not Units.Table (U2).Internal
351 then
352 return True;
354 elsif Units.Table (U2).Internal
355 and not Units.Table (U1).Internal
356 then
357 return False;
359 -- Prefer a body to a spec
361 elsif Body_Unit (U1) and not Body_Unit (U2) then
362 return True;
364 elsif Body_Unit (U2) and not Body_Unit (U1) then
365 return False;
367 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
368 -- more recently elaborated. Consider the following:
370 -- spec of A
371 -- spec of B
372 -- body of A or B?
374 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
375 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
376 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
377 -- to put the body of B first.
379 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and then Waiting_Body (U2) then
380 return
381 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position >
382 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
384 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order
386 else
387 return Uname_Less (Units.Table (U1).Uname, Units.Table (U2).Uname);
388 end if;
389 end Better_Choice;
391 ----------------
392 -- Build_Link --
393 ----------------
395 procedure Build_Link
396 (Before : Unit_Id;
397 After : Unit_Id;
398 R : Succ_Reason;
399 Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link)
401 Cspec : Unit_Id;
403 begin
404 Succ.Increment_Last;
405 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Before := Before;
406 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Next := UNR.Table (Before).Successors;
407 UNR.Table (Before).Successors := Succ.Last;
408 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason := R;
409 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason_Unit := Cur_Unit;
410 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_All_Link := Ea_Id;
412 -- Deal with special Elab_Body case. If the After of this link is
413 -- a body whose spec has Elaborate_All set, and this is not the link
414 -- directly from the body to the spec, then we make the After of the
415 -- link reference its spec instead, marking the link appropriately.
417 if Units.Table (After).Utype = Is_Body then
418 Cspec := Corresponding_Spec (After);
420 if Units.Table (Cspec).Elaborate_Body
421 and then Cspec /= Before
422 then
423 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := Cspec;
424 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := True;
425 UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred + 1;
426 return;
427 end if;
428 end if;
430 -- Fall through on normal case
432 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := After;
433 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := False;
434 UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred + 1;
435 end Build_Link;
437 ------------
438 -- Choose --
439 ------------
441 procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id) is
442 S : Successor_Id;
443 U : Unit_Id;
445 begin
446 if Debug_Flag_C then
447 Write_Str ("Choosing Unit ");
448 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (Chosen).Uname);
449 Write_Eol;
450 end if;
452 -- Add to elaboration order. Note that units having no elaboration
453 -- code are not treated specially yet. The special casing of this
454 -- is in Bindgen, where Gen_Elab_Calls skips over them. Meanwhile
455 -- we need them here, because the object file list is also driven
456 -- by the contents of the Elab_Order table.
458 Elab_Order.Increment_Last;
459 Elab_Order.Table (Elab_Order.Last) := Chosen;
461 -- Remove from No_Pred list. This is a little inefficient and may
462 -- be we should doubly link the list, but it will do for now!
464 if No_Pred = Chosen then
465 No_Pred := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
467 else
468 -- Note that we just ignore the situation where it does not
469 -- appear in the No_Pred list, this happens in calls from the
470 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem routine, where cycles are being
471 -- removed arbitrarily from the graph.
473 U := No_Pred;
474 while U /= No_Unit_Id loop
475 if UNR.Table (U).Nextnp = Chosen then
476 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
477 exit;
478 end if;
480 U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
481 end loop;
482 end if;
484 -- For all successors, decrement the number of predecessors, and
485 -- if it becomes zero, then add to no predecessor list.
487 S := UNR.Table (Chosen).Successors;
488 while S /= No_Successor loop
489 U := Succ.Table (S).After;
490 UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred - 1;
492 if Debug_Flag_N then
493 Write_Str (" decrementing Num_Pred for unit ");
494 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
495 Write_Str (" new value = ");
496 Write_Int (Int (UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred));
497 Write_Eol;
498 end if;
500 if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
501 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
502 No_Pred := U;
503 end if;
505 S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
506 end loop;
508 -- All done, adjust number of units left count and set elaboration pos
510 Num_Left := Num_Left - 1;
511 Num_Chosen := Num_Chosen + 1;
512 UNR.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
513 Units.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
515 -- If we just chose a spec with Elaborate_Body set, then we
516 -- must immediately elaborate the body, before any other units.
518 if Units.Table (Chosen).Elaborate_Body then
520 -- If the unit is a spec only, then there is no body. This is a bit
521 -- odd given that Elaborate_Body is here, but it is valid in an
522 -- RCI unit, where we only have the interface in the stub bind.
524 if Units.Table (Chosen).Utype = Is_Spec_Only
525 and then Units.Table (Chosen).RCI
526 then
527 null;
528 else
529 Choose (Corresponding_Body (Chosen));
530 end if;
531 end if;
532 end Choose;
534 ------------------------
535 -- Corresponding_Body --
536 ------------------------
538 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
539 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
540 -- first and the spec appearing second.
542 function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
543 begin
544 pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Spec);
545 return U - 1;
546 end Corresponding_Body;
548 ------------------------
549 -- Corresponding_Spec --
550 ------------------------
552 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
553 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
554 -- first and the spec appearing second.
556 function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
557 begin
558 pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body);
559 return U + 1;
560 end Corresponding_Spec;
562 ----------------------------------
563 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem --
564 ----------------------------------
566 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem is
568 function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean;
569 -- Recursive routine used to find a path from node Ufrom to node Uto.
570 -- If a path exists, returns True and outputs an appropriate set of
571 -- error messages giving the path. Also calls Choose for each of the
572 -- nodes so that they get removed from the remaining set. There are
573 -- two cases of calls, either Ufrom = Uto for an attempt to find a
574 -- cycle, or Ufrom is a spec and Uto the corresponding body for the
575 -- case of an unsatisfiable Elaborate_Body pragma. ML is the minimum
576 -- acceptable length for a path.
578 ---------------
579 -- Find_Path --
580 ---------------
582 function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean is
584 function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean;
585 -- This is the inner recursive routine, it determines if a path
586 -- exists from U to Uto, and if so returns True and outputs the
587 -- appropriate set of error messages. PL is the path length
589 ---------------
590 -- Find_Link --
591 ---------------
593 function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean is
594 S : Successor_Id;
596 begin
597 -- Recursion ends if we are at terminating node and the path
598 -- is sufficiently long, generate error message and return True.
600 if U = Uto and then PL >= ML then
601 Choose (U);
602 return True;
604 -- All done if already visited, otherwise mark as visited
606 elsif UNR.Table (U).Visited then
607 return False;
609 -- Otherwise mark as visited and look at all successors
611 else
612 UNR.Table (U).Visited := True;
614 S := UNR.Table (U).Successors;
615 while S /= No_Successor loop
616 if Find_Link (Succ.Table (S).After, PL + 1) then
617 Elab_Error_Msg (S);
618 Choose (U);
619 return True;
620 end if;
622 S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
623 end loop;
625 -- Falling through means this does not lead to a path
627 return False;
628 end if;
629 end Find_Link;
631 -- Start of processing for Find_Path
633 begin
634 -- Initialize all non-chosen nodes to not visisted yet
636 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
637 UNR.Table (U).Visited := UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position /= 0;
638 end loop;
640 -- Now try to find the path
642 return Find_Link (Ufrom, 0);
643 end Find_Path;
645 -- Start of processing for Diagnose_Elaboration_Error
647 begin
648 Set_Standard_Error;
650 -- Output state of things if debug flag N set
652 if Debug_Flag_N then
653 declare
654 NP : Int;
656 begin
657 Write_Eol;
658 Write_Eol;
659 Write_Str ("Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem called");
660 Write_Eol;
661 Write_Str ("List of remaining unchosen units and predecessors");
662 Write_Eol;
664 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
665 if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
666 NP := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred;
667 Write_Eol;
668 Write_Str (" Unchosen unit: #");
669 Write_Int (Int (U));
670 Write_Str (" ");
671 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
672 Write_Str (" (Num_Pred = ");
673 Write_Int (NP);
674 Write_Char (')');
675 Write_Eol;
677 if NP = 0 then
678 if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
679 Write_Str
680 (" (not chosen because of Elaborate_Body)");
681 Write_Eol;
682 else
683 Write_Str (" ****************** why not chosen?");
684 Write_Eol;
685 end if;
686 end if;
688 -- Search links list to find unchosen predecessors
690 for S in Succ.First .. Succ.Last loop
691 declare
692 SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
694 begin
695 if SL.After = U
696 and then UNR.Table (SL.Before).Elab_Position = 0
697 then
698 Write_Str (" unchosen predecessor: #");
699 Write_Int (Int (SL.Before));
700 Write_Str (" ");
701 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname);
702 Write_Eol;
703 NP := NP - 1;
704 end if;
705 end;
706 end loop;
708 if NP /= 0 then
709 Write_Str (" **************** Num_Pred value wrong!");
710 Write_Eol;
711 end if;
712 end if;
713 end loop;
714 end;
715 end if;
717 -- Output the header for the error, and manually increment the
718 -- error count. We are using Error_Msg_Output rather than Error_Msg
719 -- here for two reasons:
721 -- This is really only one error, not one for each line
722 -- We want this output on standard output since it is voluminous
724 -- But we do need to deal with the error count manually in this case
726 Errors_Detected := Errors_Detected + 1;
727 Error_Msg_Output ("elaboration circularity detected", Info => False);
729 -- Try to find cycles starting with any of the remaining nodes that have
730 -- not yet been chosen. There must be at least one (there is some reason
731 -- we are being called!)
733 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
734 if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
735 if Find_Path (U, U, 1) then
736 raise Unrecoverable_Error;
737 end if;
738 end if;
739 end loop;
741 -- We should never get here, since we were called for some reason,
742 -- and we should have found and eliminated at least one bad path.
744 raise Program_Error;
745 end Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
747 --------------------
748 -- Elab_All_Links --
749 --------------------
751 procedure Elab_All_Links
752 (Before : Unit_Id;
753 After : Unit_Id;
754 Reason : Succ_Reason;
755 Link : Elab_All_Id)
757 begin
758 if UNR.Table (Before).Visited then
759 return;
760 end if;
762 -- Build the direct link for Before
764 UNR.Table (Before).Visited := True;
765 Build_Link (Before, After, Reason, Link);
767 -- Process all units with'ed by Before recursively
769 for W in
770 Units.Table (Before).First_With .. Units.Table (Before).Last_With
771 loop
772 -- Skip if this with is an interface to a stand-alone library.
773 -- Skip also if no ALI file for this with, happens with certain
774 -- specialized generic files that do not get compiled.
776 if not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface
777 and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
778 and then Generic_Separately_Compiled (Withs.Table (W).Sfile)
779 then
780 Elab_All_Links
781 (Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname),
782 After,
783 Reason,
784 Make_Elab_Entry (Withs.Table (W).Uname, Link));
785 end if;
786 end loop;
788 -- Process corresponding body, if there is one
790 if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Spec then
791 Elab_All_Links
792 (Corresponding_Body (Before),
793 After, Reason,
794 Make_Elab_Entry
795 (Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (Before)).Uname, Link));
796 end if;
797 end Elab_All_Links;
799 --------------------
800 -- Elab_Error_Msg --
801 --------------------
803 procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id) is
804 SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
806 begin
807 -- Nothing to do if internal unit involved and no -da flag
809 if not Debug_Flag_A
810 and then
811 (Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Sfile)
812 or else
813 Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.After).Sfile))
814 then
815 return;
816 end if;
818 -- Here we want to generate output
820 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
822 if SL.Elab_Body then
823 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (SL.After)).Uname;
824 else
825 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
826 end if;
828 Error_Msg_Output (" & must be elaborated before &", Info => True);
830 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Reason_Unit).Uname;
832 case SL.Reason is
833 when Withed =>
834 Error_Msg_Output
835 (" reason: with clause",
836 Info => True);
838 when Elab =>
839 Error_Msg_Output
840 (" reason: pragma Elaborate in unit &",
841 Info => True);
843 when Elab_All =>
844 Error_Msg_Output
845 (" reason: pragma Elaborate_All in unit &",
846 Info => True);
848 when Elab_All_Desirable =>
849 Error_Msg_Output
850 (" reason: implicit Elaborate_All in unit &",
851 Info => True);
853 Error_Msg_Output
854 (" recompile & with -gnatwl for full details",
855 Info => True);
857 when Elab_Desirable =>
858 Error_Msg_Output
859 (" reason: implicit Elaborate in unit &",
860 Info => True);
862 Error_Msg_Output
863 (" recompile & with -gnatwl for full details",
864 Info => True);
866 when Spec_First =>
867 Error_Msg_Output
868 (" reason: spec always elaborated before body",
869 Info => True);
870 end case;
872 Write_Elab_All_Chain (S);
874 if SL.Elab_Body then
875 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
876 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
877 Error_Msg_Output
878 (" & must therefore be elaborated before &",
879 True);
881 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
882 Error_Msg_Output
883 (" (because & has a pragma Elaborate_Body)",
884 True);
885 end if;
887 Write_Eol;
888 end Elab_Error_Msg;
890 ---------------------
891 -- Find_Elab_Order --
892 ---------------------
894 procedure Find_Elab_Order is
895 U : Unit_Id;
896 Best_So_Far : Unit_Id;
898 begin
899 Succ.Init;
900 Num_Left := Int (Units.Last - Units.First + 1);
902 -- Initialize unit table for elaboration control
904 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
905 UNR.Increment_Last;
906 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Successors := No_Successor;
907 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Num_Pred := 0;
908 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Nextnp := No_Unit_Id;
909 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Order := 0;
910 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Position := 0;
911 end loop;
913 -- Output warning if -p used with no -gnatE units
915 if Pessimistic_Elab_Order
916 and not Dynamic_Elaboration_Checks_Specified
917 then
918 if OpenVMS_On_Target then
919 Error_Msg ("?use of /PESSIMISTIC_ELABORATION questionable");
920 else
921 Error_Msg ("?use of -p switch questionable");
922 end if;
924 Error_Msg ("?since all units compiled with static elaboration model");
925 end if;
927 -- Gather dependencies and output them if option set
929 Gather_Dependencies;
931 -- Output elaboration dependencies if option is set
933 if Elab_Dependency_Output or Debug_Flag_E then
934 Write_Dependencies;
935 end if;
937 -- Initialize the no predecessor list
939 No_Pred := No_Unit_Id;
941 for U in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
942 if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
943 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
944 No_Pred := U;
945 end if;
946 end loop;
948 -- OK, now we determine the elaboration order proper. All we do is to
949 -- select the best choice from the no predecessor list until all the
950 -- nodes have been chosen.
952 Outer : loop
954 -- If there are no nodes with predecessors, then either we are
955 -- done, as indicated by Num_Left being set to zero, or we have
956 -- a circularity. In the latter case, diagnose the circularity,
957 -- removing it from the graph and continue
959 Get_No_Pred : while No_Pred = No_Unit_Id loop
960 exit Outer when Num_Left < 1;
961 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
962 end loop Get_No_Pred;
964 U := No_Pred;
965 Best_So_Far := No_Unit_Id;
967 -- Loop to choose best entry in No_Pred list
969 No_Pred_Search : loop
970 if Debug_Flag_N then
971 Write_Str (" considering choice of ");
972 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
973 Write_Eol;
975 if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
976 Write_Str
977 (" Elaborate_Body = True, Num_Pred for body = ");
978 Write_Int
979 (Int (UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U)).Num_Pred));
980 else
981 Write_Str
982 (" Elaborate_Body = False");
983 end if;
985 Write_Eol;
986 end if;
988 -- This is a candididate to be considered for choice
990 if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id
991 or else ((not Pessimistic_Elab_Order)
992 and then Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
993 or else (Pessimistic_Elab_Order
994 and then Worse_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
995 then
996 if Debug_Flag_N then
997 Write_Str (" tentatively chosen (best so far)");
998 Write_Eol;
999 end if;
1001 Best_So_Far := U;
1002 end if;
1004 U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
1005 exit No_Pred_Search when U = No_Unit_Id;
1006 end loop No_Pred_Search;
1008 -- If no candididate chosen, it means that no unit has No_Pred = 0,
1009 -- but there are units left, hence we have a circular dependency,
1010 -- which we will get Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem to diagnose it.
1012 if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id then
1013 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
1015 -- Otherwise choose the best candidate found
1017 else
1018 Choose (Best_So_Far);
1019 end if;
1020 end loop Outer;
1022 end Find_Elab_Order;
1024 -------------------------
1025 -- Gather_Dependencies --
1026 -------------------------
1028 procedure Gather_Dependencies is
1029 Withed_Unit : Unit_Id;
1031 begin
1032 -- Loop through all units
1034 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
1035 Cur_Unit := U;
1037 -- If this is not an interface to a stand-alone library and
1038 -- there is a body and a spec, then spec must be elaborated first
1039 -- Note that the corresponding spec immediately follows the body
1041 if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface
1042 and then Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1043 then
1044 Build_Link (Corresponding_Spec (U), U, Spec_First);
1045 end if;
1047 -- If this unit is not an interface to a stand-alone library,
1048 -- process WITH references for this unit ignoring generic units and
1049 -- interfaces to stand-alone libraries.
1051 if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface then
1053 W in Units.Table (U).First_With .. Units.Table (U).Last_With
1054 loop
1055 if Withs.Table (W).Sfile /= No_File
1056 and then (not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface)
1057 then
1058 -- Check for special case of withing a unit that does not
1059 -- exist any more. If the unit was completely missing we
1060 -- would already have detected this, but a nasty case arises
1061 -- when we have a subprogram body with no spec, and some
1062 -- obsolete unit with's a previous (now disappeared) spec.
1064 if Get_Name_Table_Info (Withs.Table (W).Uname) = 0 then
1065 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (U).Sfile;
1066 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Withs.Table (W).Uname;
1067 Error_Msg ("% depends on & which no longer exists");
1068 goto Next_With;
1069 end if;
1071 Withed_Unit :=
1072 Unit_Id (Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname));
1074 -- Pragma Elaborate_All case, for this we use the recursive
1075 -- Elab_All_Links procedure to establish the links.
1077 if Withs.Table (W).Elaborate_All then
1079 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1080 -- node.
1082 for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1083 UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1084 end loop;
1086 -- Now establish all the links we need
1088 Elab_All_Links
1089 (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All,
1090 Make_Elab_Entry
1091 (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1093 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable case, for this we establish
1094 -- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1096 elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_All_Desirable then
1098 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1099 -- node.
1101 for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1102 UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1103 end loop;
1105 -- Now establish all the links we need
1107 Elab_All_Links
1108 (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All_Desirable,
1109 Make_Elab_Entry
1110 (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1112 -- Pragma Elaborate case. We must build a link for the
1113 -- withed unit itself, and also the corresponding body
1114 -- if there is one.
1116 -- However, skip this processing if there is no ALI file
1117 -- for the WITH entry, because this means it is a
1118 -- generic (even when we fix the generics so that an ALI
1119 -- file is present, we probably still will have no ALI
1120 -- file for unchecked and other special cases).
1122 elsif Withs.Table (W).Elaborate
1123 and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
1124 then
1125 Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1127 if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
1128 Build_Link
1129 (Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit), U, Elab);
1130 end if;
1132 -- Elaborate_Desirable case, for this we establish
1133 -- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1135 elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_Desirable then
1136 Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1138 if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
1139 Build_Link
1140 (Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit),
1141 U, Elab_Desirable);
1142 end if;
1144 -- Case of normal WITH with no elaboration pragmas, just
1145 -- build the single link to the directly referenced unit
1147 else
1148 Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1149 end if;
1150 end if;
1152 <<Next_With>>
1153 null;
1154 end loop;
1155 end if;
1156 end loop;
1157 end Gather_Dependencies;
1159 ---------------------
1160 -- Make_Elab_Entry --
1161 ---------------------
1163 function Make_Elab_Entry
1164 (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
1165 Link : Elab_All_Id) return Elab_All_Id
1167 begin
1168 Elab_All_Entries.Increment_Last;
1169 Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Needed_By := Unam;
1170 Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Next_Elab := Link;
1171 return Elab_All_Entries.Last;
1172 end Make_Elab_Entry;
1174 ----------------
1175 -- Unit_Id_Of --
1176 ----------------
1178 function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id is
1179 Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Uname);
1180 begin
1181 pragma Assert (Info /= 0 and then Unit_Id (Info) /= No_Unit_Id);
1182 return Unit_Id (Info);
1183 end Unit_Id_Of;
1185 ------------------
1186 -- Worse_Choice --
1187 ------------------
1189 function Worse_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1191 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
1192 -- Determines if given unit is a body
1194 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
1195 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
1196 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
1198 ---------------
1199 -- Body_Unit --
1200 ---------------
1202 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1203 begin
1204 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1205 or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
1206 end Body_Unit;
1208 ------------------
1209 -- Waiting_Body --
1210 ------------------
1212 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1213 begin
1214 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body and then
1215 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
1216 end Waiting_Body;
1218 -- Start of processing for Worse_Choice
1220 begin
1221 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
1222 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
1224 -- If either unit is internal, then use Better_Choice, since the
1225 -- language requires that predefined units not mess up in the choice
1226 -- of elaboration order, and for internal units, any problems are
1227 -- ours and not the programmers.
1229 if Units.Table (U1).Internal or else Units.Table (U2).Internal then
1230 return Better_Choice (U1, U2);
1232 -- Prefer anything else to a waiting body (!)
1234 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and not Waiting_Body (U2) then
1235 return False;
1237 elsif Waiting_Body (U2) and not Waiting_Body (U1) then
1238 return True;
1240 -- Prefer a spec to a body (!)
1242 elsif Body_Unit (U1) and not Body_Unit (U2) then
1243 return False;
1245 elsif Body_Unit (U2) and not Body_Unit (U1) then
1246 return True;
1248 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
1249 -- less recently elaborated. Consider the following:
1251 -- spec of A
1252 -- spec of B
1253 -- body of A or B?
1255 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
1256 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
1257 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
1258 -- to put the body of B last so that if there is an elaboration order
1259 -- problem, we will find it (that's what horrible order is about)
1261 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and then Waiting_Body (U2) then
1262 return
1263 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position <
1264 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
1266 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order. We do not try
1267 -- to reverse the usual choice here, since it can cause cancelling
1268 -- errors with the other inversions.
1270 else
1271 return Uname_Less (Units.Table (U1).Uname, Units.Table (U2).Uname);
1272 end if;
1273 end Worse_Choice;
1275 ------------------------
1276 -- Write_Dependencies --
1277 ------------------------
1279 procedure Write_Dependencies is
1280 begin
1281 Write_Eol;
1282 Write_Str
1283 (" ELABORATION ORDER DEPENDENCIES");
1284 Write_Eol;
1285 Write_Eol;
1287 Info_Prefix_Suppress := True;
1289 for S in Succ_First .. Succ.Last loop
1290 Elab_Error_Msg (S);
1291 end loop;
1293 Info_Prefix_Suppress := False;
1294 Write_Eol;
1295 end Write_Dependencies;
1297 --------------------------
1298 -- Write_Elab_All_Chain --
1299 --------------------------
1301 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id) is
1302 ST : constant Successor_Link := Succ.Table (S);
1303 After : constant Unit_Name_Type := Units.Table (ST.After).Uname;
1305 L : Elab_All_Id;
1306 Nam : Unit_Name_Type;
1308 First_Name : Boolean := True;
1310 begin
1311 if ST.Reason in Elab_All .. Elab_All_Desirable then
1312 L := ST.Elab_All_Link;
1313 while L /= No_Elab_All_Link loop
1314 Nam := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Needed_By;
1315 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Nam;
1316 Error_Msg_Output (" &", Info => True);
1318 Get_Name_String (Nam);
1320 if Name_Buffer (Name_Len) = 'b' then
1321 if First_Name then
1322 Error_Msg_Output
1323 (" must be elaborated along with its spec:",
1324 Info => True);
1326 else
1327 Error_Msg_Output
1328 (" which must be elaborated " &
1329 "along with its spec:",
1330 Info => True);
1331 end if;
1333 else
1334 if First_Name then
1335 Error_Msg_Output
1336 (" is withed by:",
1337 Info => True);
1339 else
1340 Error_Msg_Output
1341 (" which is withed by:",
1342 Info => True);
1343 end if;
1344 end if;
1346 First_Name := False;
1348 L := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Next_Elab;
1349 end loop;
1351 Error_Msg_Name_1 := After;
1352 Error_Msg_Output (" &", Info => True);
1353 end if;
1354 end Write_Elab_All_Chain;
1356 end Binde;