PR tree-optimization/83369 - Missing diagnostics during inlining
[official-gcc.git] / gcc / testsuite / gcc.dg / overflow-warn-1.c
bloba9d9fbae1487279a4b61b63e5d43459bd1df2123
1 /* Test for diagnostics for constant overflow. */
2 /* Origin: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> */
3 /* { dg-do compile } */
4 /* { dg-options "-std=c99" } */
6 #include <limits.h>
8 enum e {
9 E0 = INT_MAX,
10 /* Unsigned overflow wraps around. */
11 E1 = UINT_MAX + 1,
12 /* Overflow in an unevaluated part of an expression is OK (example
13 in the standard). */
14 E2 = 2 || 1 / 0,
15 E3 = 1 / 0, /* { dg-warning "10:division by zero" } */
16 /* { dg-error "3:enumerator value for 'E3' is not an integer constant" "enum error" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
17 /* But as in DR#031, the 1/0 in an evaluated subexpression means the
18 whole expression violates the constraints. */
19 E4 = 0 * (1 / 0), /* { dg-warning "15:division by zero" } */
20 /* { dg-error "enumerator value for 'E4' is not an integer constant" "enum error" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
21 E5 = INT_MAX + 1, /* { dg-warning "16:integer overflow in expression" } */
22 /* Again, overflow in evaluated subexpression. */
23 E6 = 0 * (INT_MAX + 1), /* { dg-warning "21:integer overflow in expression" } */
24 /* A cast does not constitute overflow in conversion. */
25 E7 = (char) INT_MAX
28 struct s {
29 int a;
30 int : 0 * (1 / 0); /* { dg-warning "16:division by zero" } */
31 /* { dg-error "not an integer constant" "22:integer constant" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
32 int : 0 * (INT_MAX + 1); /* { dg-warning "integer overflow in expression" } */
35 void
36 f (void)
38 /* This expression is not required to be a constant expression, so
39 it should just involve undefined behavior at runtime. */
40 int c = INT_MAX + 1; /* { dg-warning "19:integer overflow in expression" } */
43 /* But this expression does need to be constant. */
44 static int sc = INT_MAX + 1; /* { dg-warning "25:integer overflow in expression" } */
46 /* The first two of these involve overflow, so are not null pointer
47 constants. The third has the overflow in an unevaluated
48 subexpression, so is a null pointer constant. */
49 void *p = 0 * (INT_MAX + 1); /* { dg-warning "integer overflow in expression" } */
50 /* { dg-warning "initialization of 'void \\*' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast" "null" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
51 void *q = 0 * (1 / 0); /* { dg-warning "division by zero" } */
52 /* { dg-error "initializer element is not constant" "constant" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
53 /* { dg-warning "initialization of 'void \\*' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast" "null" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
54 void *r = (1 ? 0 : INT_MAX+1);
56 void
57 g (int i)
59 switch (i)
61 case 0 * (1/0): /* { dg-warning "division by zero" } */
62 /* { dg-error "case label does not reduce to an integer constant" "constant" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
64 case 1 + 0 * (INT_MAX + 1): /* { dg-warning "integer overflow in expression" } */
69 int
70 h (void)
72 return INT_MAX + 1; /* { dg-warning "integer overflow in expression" } */
75 int
76 h1 (void)
78 return INT_MAX + 1 - INT_MAX; /* { dg-warning "integer overflow in expression" } */
81 void fuc (unsigned char);
82 void fsc (signed char);
84 void
85 h2 (void)
87 fsc (SCHAR_MAX + 1);
88 fsc (SCHAR_MIN - 1); /* { dg-warning "overflow in conversion from .int. to .signed char. changes value " } */
89 fsc (UCHAR_MAX);
90 fsc (UCHAR_MAX + 1); /* { dg-warning "overflow in conversion from .int. to .signed char. changes value from " } */
91 fuc (-1);
92 fuc (UCHAR_MAX + 1); /* { dg-warning "unsigned conversion from .int. to .unsigned char. changes value " } */
93 fuc (SCHAR_MIN);
94 fuc (SCHAR_MIN - 1); /* { dg-warning "unsigned conversion from .int. to .unsigned char. changes value " } */
95 fuc (-UCHAR_MAX); /* { dg-warning "unsigned conversion from .int. to .unsigned char. changes value " } */
98 void fui (unsigned int);
99 void fsi (signed int);
101 int si;
102 unsigned ui;
104 void
105 h2i (int x)
107 /* For some reason, we only give certain warnings for implicit
108 conversions among values of the same precision with -Wconversion,
109 while we don't give others at all. */
110 fsi ((unsigned)INT_MAX + 1);
111 si = (unsigned)INT_MAX + 1;
112 si = x ? (unsigned)INT_MAX + 1 : 1;
113 fsi ((unsigned)INT_MAX + 2);
114 si = (unsigned)INT_MAX + 2;
115 si = x ? (unsigned)INT_MAX + 2 : 1;
116 fsi (UINT_MAX);
117 si = UINT_MAX;
118 fui (-1);
119 ui = -1;
120 ui = x ? -1 : 1U;
121 fui (INT_MIN);
122 ui = INT_MIN;
123 ui = x ? INT_MIN : 1U;