Merge from the pain train
[official-gcc.git] / gcc / ada / binde.adb
blobcc40af1964d5c300e4924376b42e56b8efda866b
1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 -- --
3 -- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
4 -- --
5 -- B I N D E --
6 -- --
7 -- B o d y --
8 -- --
9 -- Copyright (C) 1992-2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
10 -- --
11 -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
12 -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
13 -- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
14 -- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15 -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16 -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
17 -- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
18 -- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
19 -- to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, --
20 -- MA 02111-1307, USA. --
21 -- --
22 -- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
23 -- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
24 -- --
25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 with Binderr; use Binderr;
28 with Butil; use Butil;
29 with Debug; use Debug;
30 with Fname; use Fname;
31 with Lib; use Lib;
32 with Namet; use Namet;
33 with Opt; use Opt;
34 with Output; use Output;
36 package body Binde is
38 -- The following data structures are used to represent the graph that is
39 -- used to determine the elaboration order (using a topological sort).
41 -- The following structures are used to record successors. If A is a
42 -- successor of B in this table, it means that A must be elaborated
43 -- before B is elaborated.
45 type Successor_Id is new Nat;
46 -- Identification of single successor entry
48 No_Successor : constant Successor_Id := 0;
49 -- Used to indicate end of list of successors
51 type Elab_All_Id is new Nat;
52 -- Identification of Elab_All entry link
54 No_Elab_All_Link : constant Elab_All_Id := 0;
55 -- Used to indicate end of list
57 -- Succ_Reason indicates the reason for a particular elaboration link
59 type Succ_Reason is
60 (Withed,
61 -- After directly with's Before, so the spec of Before must be
62 -- elaborated before After is elaborated.
64 Elab,
65 -- After directly mentions Before in a pragma Elaborate, so the
66 -- body of Before must be elaborate before After is elaborated.
68 Elab_All,
69 -- After either mentions Before directly in a pragma Elaborate_All,
70 -- or mentions a third unit, X, which itself requires that Before be
71 -- elaborated before unit X is elaborated. The Elab_All_Link list
72 -- traces the dependencies in the latter case.
74 Elab_Desirable,
75 -- This is just like Elab_All, except that the elaborate all was not
76 -- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
77 -- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
79 Spec_First);
80 -- After is a body, and Before is the corresponding spec
82 -- Successor_Link contains the information for one link
84 type Successor_Link is record
85 Before : Unit_Id;
86 -- Predecessor unit
88 After : Unit_Id;
89 -- Successor unit
91 Next : Successor_Id;
92 -- Next successor on this list
94 Reason : Succ_Reason;
95 -- Reason for this link
97 Elab_Body : Boolean;
98 -- Set True if this link is needed for the special Elaborate_Body
99 -- processing described below.
101 Reason_Unit : Unit_Id;
102 -- For Reason = Elab, or Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, records the unit
103 -- containing the pragma leading to the link.
105 Elab_All_Link : Elab_All_Id;
106 -- If Reason = Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, then this points to the
107 -- first elment in a list of Elab_All entries that record the with
108 -- chain leading resulting in this particular dependency.
110 end record;
112 -- Note on handling of Elaborate_Body. Basically, if we have a pragma
113 -- Elaborate_Body in a unit, it means that the spec and body have to
114 -- be handled as a single entity from the point of view of determining
115 -- an elaboration order. What we do is to essentially remove the body
116 -- from consideration completely, and transfer all its links (other
117 -- than the spec link) to the spec. Then when then the spec gets chosen,
118 -- we choose the body right afterwards. We mark the links that get moved
119 -- from the body to the spec by setting their Elab_Body flag True, so
120 -- that we can understand what is going on!
122 Succ_First : constant := 1;
124 package Succ is new Table.Table (
125 Table_Component_Type => Successor_Link,
126 Table_Index_Type => Successor_Id,
127 Table_Low_Bound => Succ_First,
128 Table_Initial => 500,
129 Table_Increment => 200,
130 Table_Name => "Succ");
132 -- For the case of Elaborate_All, the following table is used to record
133 -- chains of with relationships that lead to the Elab_All link. These
134 -- are used solely for diagnostic purposes
136 type Elab_All_Entry is record
137 Needed_By : Unit_Name_Type;
138 -- Name of unit from which referencing unit was with'ed or otherwise
139 -- needed as a result of Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable.
141 Next_Elab : Elab_All_Id;
142 -- Link to next entry on chain (No_Elab_All_Link marks end of list)
143 end record;
145 package Elab_All_Entries is new Table.Table (
146 Table_Component_Type => Elab_All_Entry,
147 Table_Index_Type => Elab_All_Id,
148 Table_Low_Bound => 1,
149 Table_Initial => 2000,
150 Table_Increment => 200,
151 Table_Name => "Elab_All_Entries");
153 -- A Unit_Node record is built for each active unit
155 type Unit_Node_Record is record
157 Successors : Successor_Id;
158 -- Pointer to list of links for successor nodes
160 Num_Pred : Int;
161 -- Number of predecessors for this unit. Normally non-negative, but
162 -- can go negative in the case of units chosen by the diagnose error
163 -- procedure (when cycles are being removed from the graph).
165 Nextnp : Unit_Id;
166 -- Forward pointer for list of units with no predecessors
168 Elab_Order : Nat;
169 -- Position in elaboration order (zero = not placed yet)
171 Visited : Boolean;
172 -- Used in computing transitive closure for elaborate all and
173 -- also in locating cycles and paths in the diagnose routines.
175 Elab_Position : Natural;
176 -- Initialized to zero. Set non-zero when a unit is chosen and
177 -- placed in the elaboration order. The value represents the
178 -- ordinal position in the elaboration order.
180 end record;
182 package UNR is new Table.Table (
183 Table_Component_Type => Unit_Node_Record,
184 Table_Index_Type => Unit_Id,
185 Table_Low_Bound => First_Unit_Entry,
186 Table_Initial => 500,
187 Table_Increment => 200,
188 Table_Name => "UNR");
190 No_Pred : Unit_Id;
191 -- Head of list of items with no predecessors
193 Num_Left : Int;
194 -- Number of entries not yet dealt with
196 Cur_Unit : Unit_Id;
197 -- Current unit, set by Gather_Dependencies, and picked up in Build_Link
198 -- to set the Reason_Unit field of the created dependency link.
200 Num_Chosen : Natural := 0;
201 -- Number of units chosen in the elaboration order so far
203 -----------------------
204 -- Local Subprograms --
205 -----------------------
207 function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
208 -- U1 and U2 are both permitted candidates for selection as the next unit
209 -- to be elaborated. This function determines whether U1 is a better choice
210 -- than U2, i.e. should be elaborated in preference to U2, based on a set
211 -- of heuristics that establish a friendly and predictable order (see body
212 -- for details). The result is True if U1 is a better choice than U2, and
213 -- False if it is a worse choice, or there is no preference between them.
215 procedure Build_Link
216 (Before : Unit_Id;
217 After : Unit_Id;
218 R : Succ_Reason;
219 Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link);
220 -- Establish a successor link, Before must be elaborated before After,
221 -- and the reason for the link is R. Ea_Id is the contents to be placed
222 -- in the Elab_All_Link of the entry.
224 procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id);
225 -- Chosen is the next entry chosen in the elaboration order. This
226 -- procedure updates all data structures appropriately.
228 function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
229 pragma Inline (Corresponding_Body);
230 -- Given a unit which is a spec for which there is a separate body,
231 -- return the unit id of the body. It is an error to call this routine
232 -- with a unit that is not a spec, or which does not have a separate body.
234 function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id;
235 pragma Inline (Corresponding_Spec);
236 -- Given a unit which is a body for which there is a separate spec,
237 -- return the unit id of the spec. It is an error to call this routine
238 -- with a unit that is not a body, or which does not have a separate spec.
240 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
241 -- Called when no elaboration order can be found. Outputs an appropriate
242 -- diagnosis of the problem, and then abandons the bind.
244 procedure Elab_All_Links
245 (Before : Unit_Id;
246 After : Unit_Id;
247 Reason : Succ_Reason;
248 Link : Elab_All_Id);
249 -- Used to compute the transitive closure of elaboration links for an
250 -- Elaborate_All pragma (Reason = Elab_All) or for an indication of
251 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable (Reason = Elab_Desirable). Unit After has
252 -- a pragma Elaborate_All or the front end has determined that a reference
253 -- probably requires Elaborate_All is required, and unit Before must be
254 -- previously elaborated. First a link is built making sure that unit
255 -- Before is elaborated before After, then a recursive call ensures that
256 -- we also build links for any units needed by Before (i.e. these units
257 -- must/should also be elaborated before After). Link is used to build
258 -- a chain of Elab_All_Entries to explain the reason for a link. The
259 -- value passed is the chain so far.
261 procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id);
262 -- Given a successor link, outputs an error message of the form
263 -- "& must be elaborated before & ..." where ... is the reason.
265 procedure Gather_Dependencies;
266 -- Compute dependencies, building the Succ and UNR tables
268 function Make_Elab_Entry
269 (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
270 Link : Elab_All_Id)
271 return Elab_All_Id;
272 -- Make an Elab_All_Entries table entry with the given Unam and Link.
274 function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id;
275 -- This function uses the Info field set in the names table to obtain
276 -- the unit Id of a unit, given its name id value.
278 function Worse_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
279 -- This is like Better_Choice, and has the same interface, but returns
280 -- true if U1 is a worse choice than U2 in the sense of the -h (horrible
281 -- elaboration order) switch. We still have to obey Ada rules, so it is
282 -- not quite the direct inverse of Better_Choice.
284 procedure Write_Dependencies;
285 -- Write out dependencies (called only if appropriate option is set)
287 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id);
288 -- If the reason for the link S is Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable,
289 -- then this routine will output the "needed by" explanation chain.
291 -------------------
292 -- Better_Choice --
293 -------------------
295 function Better_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
297 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
298 -- Determines if given unit is a body
300 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
301 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
302 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
304 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
305 begin
306 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
307 or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
308 end Body_Unit;
310 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
311 begin
312 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
313 and then UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
314 end Waiting_Body;
316 -- Start of processing for Better_Choice
318 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
319 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
321 begin
322 -- Prefer a waiting body to any other case
324 if Waiting_Body (U1) and not Waiting_Body (U2) then
325 return True;
327 elsif Waiting_Body (U2) and not Waiting_Body (U1) then
328 return False;
330 -- Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
332 elsif Units.Table (U1).Predefined
333 and not Units.Table (U2).Predefined
334 then
335 return True;
337 elsif Units.Table (U2).Predefined
338 and not Units.Table (U1).Predefined
339 then
340 return False;
342 -- Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
344 elsif Units.Table (U1).Internal
345 and not Units.Table (U2).Internal
346 then
347 return True;
349 elsif Units.Table (U2).Internal
350 and not Units.Table (U1).Internal
351 then
352 return False;
354 -- Prefer a body to a spec
356 elsif Body_Unit (U1) and not Body_Unit (U2) then
357 return True;
359 elsif Body_Unit (U2) and not Body_Unit (U1) then
360 return False;
362 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
363 -- more recently elaborated. Consider the following:
365 -- spec of A
366 -- spec of B
367 -- body of A or B?
369 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
370 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
371 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
372 -- to put the body of B first.
374 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and then Waiting_Body (U2) then
375 return
376 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position >
377 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
379 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order
381 else
382 return Uname_Less (Units.Table (U1).Uname, Units.Table (U2).Uname);
383 end if;
384 end Better_Choice;
386 ----------------
387 -- Build_Link --
388 ----------------
390 procedure Build_Link
391 (Before : Unit_Id;
392 After : Unit_Id;
393 R : Succ_Reason;
394 Ea_Id : Elab_All_Id := No_Elab_All_Link)
396 Cspec : Unit_Id;
398 begin
399 Succ.Increment_Last;
400 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Before := Before;
401 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Next := UNR.Table (Before).Successors;
402 UNR.Table (Before).Successors := Succ.Last;
403 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason := R;
404 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Reason_Unit := Cur_Unit;
405 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_All_Link := Ea_Id;
407 -- Deal with special Elab_Body case. If the After of this link is
408 -- a body whose spec has Elaborate_All set, and this is not the link
409 -- directly from the body to the spec, then we make the After of the
410 -- link reference its spec instead, marking the link appropriately.
412 if Units.Table (After).Utype = Is_Body then
413 Cspec := Corresponding_Spec (After);
415 if Units.Table (Cspec).Elaborate_Body
416 and then Cspec /= Before
417 then
418 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := Cspec;
419 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := True;
420 UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (Cspec).Num_Pred + 1;
421 return;
422 end if;
423 end if;
425 -- Fall through on normal case
427 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).After := After;
428 Succ.Table (Succ.Last).Elab_Body := False;
429 UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (After).Num_Pred + 1;
430 end Build_Link;
432 ------------
433 -- Choose --
434 ------------
436 procedure Choose (Chosen : Unit_Id) is
437 S : Successor_Id;
438 U : Unit_Id;
440 begin
441 if Debug_Flag_C then
442 Write_Str ("Choosing Unit ");
443 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (Chosen).Uname);
444 Write_Eol;
445 end if;
447 -- Add to elaboration order. Note that units having no elaboration
448 -- code are not treated specially yet. The special casing of this
449 -- is in Bindgen, where Gen_Elab_Calls skips over them. Meanwhile
450 -- we need them here, because the object file list is also driven
451 -- by the contents of the Elab_Order table.
453 Elab_Order.Increment_Last;
454 Elab_Order.Table (Elab_Order.Last) := Chosen;
456 -- Remove from No_Pred list. This is a little inefficient and may
457 -- be we should doubly link the list, but it will do for now!
459 if No_Pred = Chosen then
460 No_Pred := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
462 else
463 -- Note that we just ignore the situation where it does not
464 -- appear in the No_Pred list, this happens in calls from the
465 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem routine, where cycles are being
466 -- removed arbitrarily from the graph.
468 U := No_Pred;
469 while U /= No_Unit_Id loop
470 if UNR.Table (U).Nextnp = Chosen then
471 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := UNR.Table (Chosen).Nextnp;
472 exit;
473 end if;
475 U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
476 end loop;
477 end if;
479 -- For all successors, decrement the number of predecessors, and
480 -- if it becomes zero, then add to no predecessor list.
482 S := UNR.Table (Chosen).Successors;
484 while S /= No_Successor loop
485 U := Succ.Table (S).After;
486 UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred - 1;
488 if Debug_Flag_N then
489 Write_Str (" decrementing Num_Pred for unit ");
490 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
491 Write_Str (" new value = ");
492 Write_Int (Int (UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred));
493 Write_Eol;
494 end if;
496 if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
497 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
498 No_Pred := U;
499 end if;
501 S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
502 end loop;
504 -- All done, adjust number of units left count and set elaboration pos
506 Num_Left := Num_Left - 1;
507 Num_Chosen := Num_Chosen + 1;
508 UNR.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
509 Units.Table (Chosen).Elab_Position := Num_Chosen;
511 -- If we just chose a spec with Elaborate_Body set, then we
512 -- must immediately elaborate the body, before any other units.
514 if Units.Table (Chosen).Elaborate_Body then
516 -- If the unit is a spec only, then there is no body. This is a bit
517 -- odd given that Elaborate_Body is here, but it is valid in an
518 -- RCI unit, where we only have the interface in the stub bind.
520 if Units.Table (Chosen).Utype = Is_Spec_Only
521 and then Units.Table (Chosen).RCI
522 then
523 null;
524 else
525 Choose (Corresponding_Body (Chosen));
526 end if;
527 end if;
528 end Choose;
530 ------------------------
531 -- Corresponding_Body --
532 ------------------------
534 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
535 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
536 -- first and the spec appearing second.
538 function Corresponding_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
539 begin
540 pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Spec);
541 return U - 1;
542 end Corresponding_Body;
544 ------------------------
545 -- Corresponding_Spec --
546 ------------------------
548 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
549 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
550 -- first and the spec appearing second.
552 function Corresponding_Spec (U : Unit_Id) return Unit_Id is
553 begin
554 pragma Assert (Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body);
555 return U + 1;
556 end Corresponding_Spec;
558 ----------------------------------
559 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem --
560 ----------------------------------
562 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem is
564 function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean;
565 -- Recursive routine used to find a path from node Ufrom to node Uto.
566 -- If a path exists, returns True and outputs an appropriate set of
567 -- error messages giving the path. Also calls Choose for each of the
568 -- nodes so that they get removed from the remaining set. There are
569 -- two cases of calls, either Ufrom = Uto for an attempt to find a
570 -- cycle, or Ufrom is a spec and Uto the corresponding body for the
571 -- case of an unsatisfiable Elaborate_Body pragma. ML is the minimum
572 -- acceptable length for a path.
574 ---------------
575 -- Find_Path --
576 ---------------
578 function Find_Path (Ufrom, Uto : Unit_Id; ML : Nat) return Boolean is
580 function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean;
581 -- This is the inner recursive routine, it determines if a path
582 -- exists from U to Uto, and if so returns True and outputs the
583 -- appropriate set of error messages. PL is the path length
585 ---------------
586 -- Find_Link --
587 ---------------
589 function Find_Link (U : Unit_Id; PL : Nat) return Boolean is
590 S : Successor_Id;
592 begin
593 -- Recursion ends if we are at terminating node and the path
594 -- is sufficiently long, generate error message and return True.
596 if U = Uto and then PL >= ML then
597 Choose (U);
598 return True;
600 -- All done if already visited, otherwise mark as visited
602 elsif UNR.Table (U).Visited then
603 return False;
605 -- Otherwise mark as visited and look at all successors
607 else
608 UNR.Table (U).Visited := True;
610 S := UNR.Table (U).Successors;
611 while S /= No_Successor loop
612 if Find_Link (Succ.Table (S).After, PL + 1) then
613 Elab_Error_Msg (S);
614 Choose (U);
615 return True;
616 end if;
618 S := Succ.Table (S).Next;
619 end loop;
621 -- Falling through means this does not lead to a path
623 return False;
624 end if;
625 end Find_Link;
627 -- Start of processing for Find_Path
629 begin
630 -- Initialize all non-chosen nodes to not visisted yet
632 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
633 UNR.Table (U).Visited := UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position /= 0;
634 end loop;
636 -- Now try to find the path
638 return Find_Link (Ufrom, 0);
639 end Find_Path;
641 -- Start of processing for Diagnose_Elaboration_Error
643 begin
644 Set_Standard_Error;
646 -- Output state of things if debug flag N set
648 if Debug_Flag_N then
649 declare
650 NP : Int;
652 begin
653 Write_Eol;
654 Write_Eol;
655 Write_Str ("Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem called");
656 Write_Eol;
657 Write_Str ("List of remaining unchosen units and predecessors");
658 Write_Eol;
660 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
661 if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
662 NP := UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred;
663 Write_Eol;
664 Write_Str (" Unchosen unit: #");
665 Write_Int (Int (U));
666 Write_Str (" ");
667 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
668 Write_Str (" (Num_Pred = ");
669 Write_Int (NP);
670 Write_Char (')');
671 Write_Eol;
673 if NP = 0 then
674 if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
675 Write_Str
676 (" (not chosen because of Elaborate_Body)");
677 Write_Eol;
678 else
679 Write_Str (" ****************** why not chosen?");
680 Write_Eol;
681 end if;
682 end if;
684 -- Search links list to find unchosen predecessors
686 for S in Succ.First .. Succ.Last loop
687 declare
688 SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
690 begin
691 if SL.After = U
692 and then UNR.Table (SL.Before).Elab_Position = 0
693 then
694 Write_Str (" unchosen predecessor: #");
695 Write_Int (Int (SL.Before));
696 Write_Str (" ");
697 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname);
698 Write_Eol;
699 NP := NP - 1;
700 end if;
701 end;
702 end loop;
704 if NP /= 0 then
705 Write_Str (" **************** Num_Pred value wrong!");
706 Write_Eol;
707 end if;
708 end if;
709 end loop;
710 end;
711 end if;
713 -- Output the header for the error, and manually increment the
714 -- error count. We are using Error_Msg_Output rather than Error_Msg
715 -- here for two reasons:
717 -- This is really only one error, not one for each line
718 -- We want this output on standard output since it is voluminous
720 -- But we do need to deal with the error count manually in this case
722 Errors_Detected := Errors_Detected + 1;
723 Error_Msg_Output ("elaboration circularity detected", Info => False);
725 -- Try to find cycles starting with any of the remaining nodes that have
726 -- not yet been chosen. There must be at least one (there is some reason
727 -- we are being called!)
729 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
730 if UNR.Table (U).Elab_Position = 0 then
731 if Find_Path (U, U, 1) then
732 raise Unrecoverable_Error;
733 end if;
734 end if;
735 end loop;
737 -- We should never get here, since we were called for some reason,
738 -- and we should have found and eliminated at least one bad path.
740 raise Program_Error;
742 end Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
744 --------------------
745 -- Elab_All_Links --
746 --------------------
748 procedure Elab_All_Links
749 (Before : Unit_Id;
750 After : Unit_Id;
751 Reason : Succ_Reason;
752 Link : Elab_All_Id)
754 begin
755 if UNR.Table (Before).Visited then
756 return;
757 end if;
759 -- Build the direct link for Before
761 UNR.Table (Before).Visited := True;
762 Build_Link (Before, After, Reason, Link);
764 -- Process all units with'ed by Before recursively
766 for W in
767 Units.Table (Before).First_With .. Units.Table (Before).Last_With
768 loop
769 -- Skip if this with is an interface to a stand-alone library.
770 -- Skip also if no ALI file for this with, happens with certain
771 -- specialized generic files that do not get compiled.
773 if not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface
774 and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
775 and then Generic_Separately_Compiled (Withs.Table (W).Sfile)
776 then
777 Elab_All_Links
778 (Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname),
779 After,
780 Reason,
781 Make_Elab_Entry (Withs.Table (W).Uname, Link));
782 end if;
783 end loop;
785 -- Process corresponding body, if there is one
787 if Units.Table (Before).Utype = Is_Spec then
788 Elab_All_Links
789 (Corresponding_Body (Before),
790 After, Reason,
791 Make_Elab_Entry
792 (Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (Before)).Uname, Link));
793 end if;
794 end Elab_All_Links;
796 --------------------
797 -- Elab_Error_Msg --
798 --------------------
800 procedure Elab_Error_Msg (S : Successor_Id) is
801 SL : Successor_Link renames Succ.Table (S);
803 begin
804 -- Nothing to do if internal unit involved and no -de flag
806 if not Debug_Flag_E
807 and then
808 (Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.Before).Sfile)
809 or else
810 Is_Internal_File_Name (Units.Table (SL.After).Sfile))
811 then
812 return;
813 end if;
815 -- Here we want to generate output
817 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
819 if SL.Elab_Body then
820 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (Corresponding_Body (SL.After)).Uname;
821 else
822 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
823 end if;
825 Error_Msg_Output (" & must be elaborated before &", Info => True);
827 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Reason_Unit).Uname;
829 case SL.Reason is
830 when Withed =>
831 Error_Msg_Output
832 (" reason: with clause",
833 Info => True);
835 when Elab =>
836 Error_Msg_Output
837 (" reason: pragma Elaborate in unit &",
838 Info => True);
840 when Elab_All =>
841 Error_Msg_Output
842 (" reason: pragma Elaborate_All in unit &",
843 Info => True);
845 when Elab_Desirable =>
846 Error_Msg_Output
847 (" reason: implicit Elaborate_All in unit &",
848 Info => True);
850 Error_Msg_Output
851 (" recompile & with -gnatwl for full details",
852 Info => True);
854 when Spec_First =>
855 Error_Msg_Output
856 (" reason: spec always elaborated before body",
857 Info => True);
858 end case;
860 Write_Elab_All_Chain (S);
862 if SL.Elab_Body then
863 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.Before).Uname;
864 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
865 Error_Msg_Output
866 (" & must therefore be elaborated before &",
867 True);
869 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (SL.After).Uname;
870 Error_Msg_Output
871 (" (because & has a pragma Elaborate_Body)",
872 True);
873 end if;
875 Write_Eol;
876 end Elab_Error_Msg;
878 ---------------------
879 -- Find_Elab_Order --
880 ---------------------
882 procedure Find_Elab_Order is
883 U : Unit_Id;
884 Best_So_Far : Unit_Id;
886 begin
887 Succ.Init;
888 Num_Left := Int (Units.Last - Units.First + 1);
890 -- Initialize unit table for elaboration control
892 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
893 UNR.Increment_Last;
894 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Successors := No_Successor;
895 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Num_Pred := 0;
896 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Nextnp := No_Unit_Id;
897 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Order := 0;
898 UNR.Table (UNR.Last).Elab_Position := 0;
899 end loop;
901 -- Gather dependencies and output them if option set
903 Gather_Dependencies;
905 -- Output elaboration dependencies if option is set
907 if Elab_Dependency_Output or Debug_Flag_E then
908 Write_Dependencies;
909 end if;
911 -- Initialize the no predecessor list
913 No_Pred := No_Unit_Id;
915 for U in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
916 if UNR.Table (U).Num_Pred = 0 then
917 UNR.Table (U).Nextnp := No_Pred;
918 No_Pred := U;
919 end if;
920 end loop;
922 -- OK, now we determine the elaboration order proper. All we do is to
923 -- select the best choice from the no predecessor list until all the
924 -- nodes have been chosen.
926 Outer : loop
927 -- If there are no nodes with predecessors, then either we are
928 -- done, as indicated by Num_Left being set to zero, or we have
929 -- a circularity. In the latter case, diagnose the circularity,
930 -- removing it from the graph and continue
932 Get_No_Pred : while No_Pred = No_Unit_Id loop
933 exit Outer when Num_Left < 1;
934 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
935 end loop Get_No_Pred;
937 U := No_Pred;
938 Best_So_Far := No_Unit_Id;
940 -- Loop to choose best entry in No_Pred list
942 No_Pred_Search : loop
943 if Debug_Flag_N then
944 Write_Str (" considering choice of ");
945 Write_Unit_Name (Units.Table (U).Uname);
946 Write_Eol;
948 if Units.Table (U).Elaborate_Body then
949 Write_Str
950 (" Elaborate_Body = True, Num_Pred for body = ");
951 Write_Int
952 (Int (UNR.Table (Corresponding_Body (U)).Num_Pred));
953 else
954 Write_Str
955 (" Elaborate_Body = False");
956 end if;
958 Write_Eol;
959 end if;
961 -- This is a candididate to be considered for choice
963 if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id
964 or else ((not Pessimistic_Elab_Order)
965 and then Better_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
966 or else (Pessimistic_Elab_Order
967 and then Worse_Choice (U, Best_So_Far))
968 then
969 if Debug_Flag_N then
970 Write_Str (" tentatively chosen (best so far)");
971 Write_Eol;
972 end if;
974 Best_So_Far := U;
975 end if;
977 U := UNR.Table (U).Nextnp;
978 exit No_Pred_Search when U = No_Unit_Id;
979 end loop No_Pred_Search;
981 -- If no candididate chosen, it means that no unit has No_Pred = 0,
982 -- but there are units left, hence we have a circular dependency,
983 -- which we will get Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem to diagnose it.
985 if Best_So_Far = No_Unit_Id then
986 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem;
988 -- Otherwise choose the best candidate found
990 else
991 Choose (Best_So_Far);
992 end if;
993 end loop Outer;
995 end Find_Elab_Order;
997 -------------------------
998 -- Gather_Dependencies --
999 -------------------------
1001 procedure Gather_Dependencies is
1002 Withed_Unit : Unit_Id;
1004 begin
1005 -- Loop through all units
1007 for U in Units.First .. Units.Last loop
1008 Cur_Unit := U;
1010 -- If this is not an interface to a stand-alone library and
1011 -- there is a body and a spec, then spec must be elaborated first
1012 -- Note that the corresponding spec immediately follows the body
1014 if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface
1015 and then Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1016 then
1017 Build_Link (Corresponding_Spec (U), U, Spec_First);
1018 end if;
1020 -- If this unit is not an interface to a stand-alone library,
1021 -- process WITH references for this unit ignoring generic units and
1022 -- interfaces to stand-alone libraries.
1024 if not Units.Table (U).SAL_Interface then
1026 W in Units.Table (U).First_With .. Units.Table (U).Last_With
1027 loop
1028 if Withs.Table (W).Sfile /= No_File
1029 and then (not Withs.Table (W).SAL_Interface)
1030 then
1031 -- Check for special case of withing a unit that does not
1032 -- exist any more. If the unit was completely missing we
1033 -- would already have detected this, but a nasty case arises
1034 -- when we have a subprogram body with no spec, and some
1035 -- obsolete unit with's a previous (now disappeared) spec.
1037 if Get_Name_Table_Info (Withs.Table (W).Uname) = 0 then
1038 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Units.Table (U).Sfile;
1039 Error_Msg_Name_2 := Withs.Table (W).Uname;
1040 Error_Msg ("% depends on & which no longer exists");
1041 goto Next_With;
1042 end if;
1044 Withed_Unit :=
1045 Unit_Id (Unit_Id_Of (Withs.Table (W).Uname));
1047 -- Pragma Elaborate_All case, for this we use the recursive
1048 -- Elab_All_Links procedure to establish the links.
1050 if Withs.Table (W).Elaborate_All then
1052 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1053 -- node.
1055 for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1056 UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1057 end loop;
1059 -- Now establish all the links we need
1061 Elab_All_Links
1062 (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_All,
1063 Make_Elab_Entry
1064 (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1066 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable case, for this we establish
1067 -- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1069 elsif Withs.Table (W).Elab_All_Desirable then
1071 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1072 -- node.
1074 for Uref in UNR.First .. UNR.Last loop
1075 UNR.Table (Uref).Visited := False;
1076 end loop;
1078 -- Now establish all the links we need
1080 Elab_All_Links
1081 (Withed_Unit, U, Elab_Desirable,
1082 Make_Elab_Entry
1083 (Withs.Table (W).Uname, No_Elab_All_Link));
1085 -- Pragma Elaborate case. We must build a link for the
1086 -- withed unit itself, and also the corresponding body
1087 -- if there is one.
1089 -- However, skip this processing if there is no ALI file
1090 -- for the WITH entry, because this means it is a
1091 -- generic (even when we fix the generics so that an ALI
1092 -- file is present, we probably still will have no ALI
1093 -- file for unchecked and other special cases).
1095 elsif Withs.Table (W).Elaborate
1096 and then Withs.Table (W).Afile /= No_File
1097 then
1098 Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1100 if Units.Table (Withed_Unit).Utype = Is_Spec then
1101 Build_Link
1102 (Corresponding_Body (Withed_Unit), U, Elab);
1103 end if;
1105 -- Case of normal WITH with no elaboration pragmas, just
1106 -- build the single link to the directly referenced unit
1108 else
1109 Build_Link (Withed_Unit, U, Withed);
1110 end if;
1111 end if;
1113 <<Next_With>>
1114 null;
1115 end loop;
1116 end if;
1117 end loop;
1118 end Gather_Dependencies;
1120 ---------------------
1121 -- Make_Elab_Entry --
1122 ---------------------
1124 function Make_Elab_Entry
1125 (Unam : Unit_Name_Type;
1126 Link : Elab_All_Id)
1127 return Elab_All_Id
1129 begin
1130 Elab_All_Entries.Increment_Last;
1131 Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Needed_By := Unam;
1132 Elab_All_Entries.Table (Elab_All_Entries.Last).Next_Elab := Link;
1133 return Elab_All_Entries.Last;
1134 end Make_Elab_Entry;
1136 ----------------
1137 -- Unit_Id_Of --
1138 ----------------
1140 function Unit_Id_Of (Uname : Unit_Name_Type) return Unit_Id is
1141 Info : constant Int := Get_Name_Table_Info (Uname);
1143 begin
1144 pragma Assert (Info /= 0 and then Unit_Id (Info) /= No_Unit_Id);
1145 return Unit_Id (Info);
1146 end Unit_Id_Of;
1148 ------------------
1149 -- Worse_Choice --
1150 ------------------
1152 function Worse_Choice (U1, U2 : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1154 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
1155 -- Determines if given unit is a body
1157 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean;
1158 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
1159 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
1161 function Body_Unit (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1162 begin
1163 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body
1164 or else Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body_Only;
1165 end Body_Unit;
1167 function Waiting_Body (U : Unit_Id) return Boolean is
1168 begin
1169 return Units.Table (U).Utype = Is_Body and then
1170 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U)).Elab_Position /= 0;
1171 end Waiting_Body;
1173 -- Start of processing for Worse_Choice
1175 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
1176 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
1178 begin
1179 -- If either unit is internal, then use Better_Choice, since the
1180 -- language requires that predefined units not mess up in the choice
1181 -- of elaboration order, and for internal units, any problems are
1182 -- ours and not the programmers.
1184 if Units.Table (U1).Internal or else Units.Table (U2).Internal then
1185 return Better_Choice (U1, U2);
1187 -- Prefer anything else to a waiting body (!)
1189 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and not Waiting_Body (U2) then
1190 return False;
1192 elsif Waiting_Body (U2) and not Waiting_Body (U1) then
1193 return True;
1195 -- Prefer a spec to a body (!)
1197 elsif Body_Unit (U1) and not Body_Unit (U2) then
1198 return False;
1200 elsif Body_Unit (U2) and not Body_Unit (U1) then
1201 return True;
1203 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
1204 -- less recently elaborated. Consider the following:
1206 -- spec of A
1207 -- spec of B
1208 -- body of A or B?
1210 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
1211 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
1212 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
1213 -- to put the body of B last so that if there is an elaboration order
1214 -- problem, we will find it (that's what horrible order is about)
1216 elsif Waiting_Body (U1) and then Waiting_Body (U2) then
1217 return
1218 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U1)).Elab_Position <
1219 UNR.Table (Corresponding_Spec (U2)).Elab_Position;
1221 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order. We do not try
1222 -- to reverse the usual choice here, since it can cause cancelling
1223 -- errors with the other inversions.
1225 else
1226 return Uname_Less (Units.Table (U1).Uname, Units.Table (U2).Uname);
1227 end if;
1228 end Worse_Choice;
1230 ------------------------
1231 -- Write_Dependencies --
1232 ------------------------
1234 procedure Write_Dependencies is
1235 begin
1236 Write_Eol;
1237 Write_Str
1238 (" ELABORATION ORDER DEPENDENCIES");
1239 Write_Eol;
1240 Write_Eol;
1242 Info_Prefix_Suppress := True;
1244 for S in Succ_First .. Succ.Last loop
1245 Elab_Error_Msg (S);
1246 end loop;
1248 Info_Prefix_Suppress := False;
1249 Write_Eol;
1250 end Write_Dependencies;
1252 --------------------------
1253 -- Write_Elab_All_Chain --
1254 --------------------------
1256 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain (S : Successor_Id) is
1257 ST : constant Successor_Link := Succ.Table (S);
1258 After : constant Unit_Name_Type := Units.Table (ST.After).Uname;
1260 L : Elab_All_Id;
1261 Nam : Unit_Name_Type;
1263 First_Name : Boolean := True;
1265 begin
1266 if ST.Reason in Elab_All .. Elab_Desirable then
1267 L := ST.Elab_All_Link;
1268 while L /= No_Elab_All_Link loop
1269 Nam := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Needed_By;
1270 Error_Msg_Name_1 := Nam;
1271 Error_Msg_Output (" &", Info => True);
1273 Get_Name_String (Nam);
1275 if Name_Buffer (Name_Len) = 'b' then
1276 if First_Name then
1277 Error_Msg_Output
1278 (" must be elaborated along with its spec:",
1279 Info => True);
1281 else
1282 Error_Msg_Output
1283 (" which must be elaborated " &
1284 "along with its spec:",
1285 Info => True);
1286 end if;
1288 else
1289 if First_Name then
1290 Error_Msg_Output
1291 (" is withed by:",
1292 Info => True);
1294 else
1295 Error_Msg_Output
1296 (" which is withed by:",
1297 Info => True);
1298 end if;
1299 end if;
1301 First_Name := False;
1303 L := Elab_All_Entries.Table (L).Next_Elab;
1304 end loop;
1306 Error_Msg_Name_1 := After;
1307 Error_Msg_Output (" &", Info => True);
1308 end if;
1309 end Write_Elab_All_Chain;
1311 end Binde;