coverity: use some event tags and ensure some shift expression size promotion
[valgrind.git] / gdbserver_tests / mcblocklistsearch.stderrB.exp
blob522f4a1f978caba71b92a5e24e102455baddf215
1 vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999
2 Breakpoint 1 at 0x........: file leak-tree.c, line 42.
3 Breakpoint 2 at 0x........: file leak-tree.c, line 68.
4 Continuing.
5 Breakpoint 1, f () at leak-tree.c:42
6 42 t->l = mk(); // B
7 Continuing.
8 Breakpoint 2, main () at leak-tree.c:68
9 68 PRINT_LEAK_COUNTS(stderr);
10 Searching for pointers to 0x........
11 *0x........ points at 0x........
12 Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "t"
13 full leak search
14 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
15 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
16 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
17 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:41)
18 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
19 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
20 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
21 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
22 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:42)
23 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
24 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ...
25 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
26 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
27 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:45)
28 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
29 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
30 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
31 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
32 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:46)
33 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
34 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ...
35 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
36 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
37 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:47)
38 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
39 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
40 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
41 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
42 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:44)
43 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
44 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
45 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
46 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
47 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:43)
48 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
49 block list 6 D
50 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
51 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
52 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
53 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:44)
54 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
55 0x........[16]
56 block list 7 C F G
57 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
58 at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
59 by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28)
60 by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:43)
61 by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63)
62 0x........[16]
63 0x........[16] indirect loss record 4
64 0x........[16] indirect loss record 5
65 monitor command request to kill this process
66 Remote connection closed