1.0.23.60: fix bug 354: XEPs in backtraces, properly this time
[sbcl/tcr.git] / tests / debug.impure.lisp
blobe0ca3b91415229c031f1d8e1885d435b5b90dd8d
1 ;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using
2 ;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g.
3 ;;;; executing DEFUN).
5 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
6 ;;;; more information.
7 ;;;;
8 ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
9 ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
10 ;;;; from CMU CL.
11 ;;;;
12 ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
13 ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
14 ;;;; more information.
16 (cl:in-package :cl-user)
18 ;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
19 (when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
20 (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104))
23 ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
25 ;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that
26 ;;; we actually export.
27 ;;;
28 ;;; Return the debug arglist of the function object FUN as a list, or
29 ;;; punt with :UNKNOWN.
30 (defun get-arglist (fun)
31 (declare (type function fun))
32 ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
33 (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun)
34 (#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag
35 (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun))
36 (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (get-arglist
37 (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun)))
38 ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme
39 ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
41 ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
42 ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just
43 ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
44 ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
45 ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
47 #+sb-eval
48 (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function)
49 (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun)
50 :unknown)
51 #-sb-eval
52 :unknown)))
54 (defun zoop (zeep &key beep)
55 blurp)
56 (assert (equal (get-arglist #'zoop) '(zeep &key beep)))
58 ;;; Check some predefined functions too.
59 ;;;
60 ;;; (We don't know exactly what the arguments are, e.g. the first
61 ;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or
62 ;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct
63 ;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.)
64 (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print)
65 (assert (symbolp object-sym))
66 (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional))
67 (assert (symbolp stream-sym)))
68 (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym)
69 (get-arglist #'format)
70 (assert (symbolp dest-sym))
71 (assert (symbolp control-sym))
72 (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest))
73 (assert (symbolp format-args-sym)))
75 ;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the
76 ;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own),
77 ;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any
78 ;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call
79 ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere.
80 (defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil))
81 (labels ((args-equal (want real)
82 (cond ((eq '&rest (car want))
84 ((endp want)
85 (endp real))
86 ((or (eq '? (car want)) (equal (car want) (car real)))
87 (args-equal (cdr want) (cdr real)))
89 nil))))
90 (let ((result nil))
91 (block outer-handler
92 (handler-bind
93 ((error (lambda (condition)
94 ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
95 (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list))
96 (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace
97 :key #'car
98 :test #'equal)))
100 (setf result condition)
102 (unless backtrace
103 (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
104 (caar frame-specs)
105 full-backtrace)
106 (setf result nil))
108 ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
109 (mapcar
110 (lambda (spec frame)
111 (unless (or (not spec)
112 (and (equal (car spec) (car frame))
113 (args-equal (cdr spec)
114 (cdr frame))))
115 (print (list :mismatch spec frame))
116 (setf result nil)))
117 frame-specs
118 backtrace)
120 ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
121 ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
122 ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
123 ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
124 (let ((end (last backtrace #-win32 2 #+win32 4)))
125 (unless (equal (caar end)
126 'sb-impl::toplevel-init)
127 (print (list :backtrace-stunted (caar end)))
128 (setf result nil)))
129 (return-from outer-handler)))))
130 (funcall test-function)))
131 result)))
133 (defvar *undefined-function-frame*
134 ;; bug 353
135 '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame"
136 #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function"))
138 ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
139 ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
140 ;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect
141 ;;; a stunted stack can result from the tail call variant.)
142 (flet ((optimized ()
143 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
144 (#:undefined-function 42))
145 (not-optimized ()
146 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
147 (#:undefined-function 42))
148 (test (fun)
149 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
150 (funcall fun)))
152 (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346)
153 :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips
154 (and :x86-64 (or :freebsd :darwin))))
155 (assert (verify-backtrace
156 (lambda () (test #'optimized))
157 (list *undefined-function-frame*
158 (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
160 ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
161 ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
162 (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)
163 ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38,
164 ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by
165 ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and
166 ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is
167 ;; no more).
168 :fails-on '(or :x86 :x86-64 :alpha :mips))
169 (assert (verify-backtrace
170 (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
171 (list *undefined-function-frame*
172 (list '(flet not-optimized))
173 (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
175 ;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
176 ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
177 ;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
178 ;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
179 ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
180 ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
181 ;;; Sparc.
183 ;;; Disabling tail call elimination on this will probably ensure that
184 ;;; the return value (to the flet or the enclosing top level form) is
185 ;;; more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM with the current spaces on OS X.
186 ;;; Enabling it might catch other problems, so do it anyway.
187 (flet ((optimized ()
188 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
189 (/ 42 0))
190 (not-optimized ()
191 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
192 (/ 42 0))
193 (test (fun)
194 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
195 (funcall fun)))
196 (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346)
197 :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 346
198 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized))
199 (list '(/ 42 &rest)
200 (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
201 (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356)
202 :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 356
203 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
204 (list '(/ 42 &rest)
205 '((flet not-optimized))
206 (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
208 (with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag)
209 :fails-on '(or
210 (and :x86 :sunos)
211 (and :x86 :darwin)
212 (and :x86-64 :darwin)
213 (and :sparc :linux)
214 :alpha
215 :mips))
216 (progn
217 (defun throw-test ()
218 (throw 'no-such-tag t))
219 (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test))))))
221 ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
223 (defun oops ()
224 (error "oops"))
226 (defmacro defbt (n ll &body body)
227 `(progn
228 ;; normal debug info
229 (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
230 ,@body)
231 ;; no arguments saved
232 (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
233 (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
234 ,@body)
235 ;; no lambda-list saved
236 (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
237 (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
238 ,@body)))
240 (defbt 1 (&key key)
241 (list key))
243 (defbt 2 (x)
244 (list x))
246 (defbt 3 (&key (key (oops)))
247 (list key))
249 ;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen
250 (defbt 4 (&optional opt)
251 (list (error "error")))
253 (defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops)))
254 (list opt))
256 (defmacro with-details (bool &body body)
257 `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
258 ,@body))
260 (defun bug-354 (x)
261 (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x))
263 (with-test (:name :bug-354)
264 (with-details t
265 (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
266 '((bug-354 &rest)
267 ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest))))))
268 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354)))))
270 ;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces
271 (with-test (:name (:backtrace :misc)
272 :fails-on '(or (and :x86 (or :sunos)) (and :x86-64 :darwin)))
273 (write-line "//tl-xep")
274 (with-details t
275 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
276 '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?)))))
277 (with-details nil
278 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
279 '((namestring)))))
281 ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR
282 (with-details t
283 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
284 '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest))))
285 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
286 '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest))))
287 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
288 '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest)))))
289 (with-details nil
290 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
291 '((bt.1.1 :key))))
292 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
293 '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
294 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
295 '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))
297 ;; XEP
298 (write-line "//xep")
299 (with-details t
300 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
301 '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?))))
302 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
303 '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest))))
304 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
305 '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest)))))
306 (with-details nil
307 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
308 '((bt.2.1))))
309 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
310 '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
311 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
312 '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))
314 ;; VARARGS-ENTRY
315 (write-line "//varargs-entry")
316 (with-details t
317 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
318 '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil))))
319 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
320 '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?))))
321 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
322 '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest)))))
323 (with-details nil
324 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
325 '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
326 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
327 '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
328 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
329 '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))
331 ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR
332 (write-line "//hairy-args-processor")
333 (with-details t
334 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
335 '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?))))
336 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
337 '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?))))
338 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
339 '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest)))))
340 (with-details nil
341 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
342 '((bt.4.1 ?))))
343 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
344 '((bt.4.2 ?))))
345 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
346 '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))
348 ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR
349 (write-line "//optional-processor")
350 (with-details t
351 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
352 '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1)))))
353 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
354 '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest))))
355 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
356 '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest)))))
357 (with-details nil
358 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
359 '((bt.5.1))))
360 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
361 '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
362 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
363 '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))
365 (write-line "//compile nil")
366 (defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil))))
367 (defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil))))
368 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13))
369 '(((lambda (x)) 13)
370 ((lambda (y)) 13))))
372 ;;;; test TRACE
374 (defun trace-this ()
375 'ok)
377 (defun trace-fact (n)
378 (if (zerop n)
380 (* n (trace-fact (1- n)))))
382 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
383 (trace trace-this)
384 (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
385 (untrace))))
386 (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
387 (assert (search "returned OK" out)))
389 ;;; bug 379
390 ;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are
391 ;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image
392 ;;; on that platform.
393 #-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin)
394 (with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil)
395 :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips))
396 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
397 (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil)
398 (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
399 (untrace))))
400 (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
401 (assert (search "returned OK" out))))
403 #-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin)
404 (with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil)
405 :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips))
406 (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
407 (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil)
408 (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5)))
409 (untrace))))
410 (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out))
411 (assert (search "returned 1" out))
412 (assert (search "returned 120" out))))
414 (with-test (:name :bug-414)
415 (handler-bind ((warning #'error))
416 (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp"))
417 (disassemble 'bug-414)))
419 ;;;; test infinite error protection
421 (defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form)
422 (if (< 0 n-levels)
423 `(handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition)
424 (declare (ignore condition))
425 ,error-form)))
426 (nest-errors ,(1- n-levels) ,error-form))
427 error-form))
429 (defun erroring-debugger-hook (condition old-debugger-hook)
430 (let ((*debugger-hook* old-debugger-hook))
431 (format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output)
432 (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition)))
434 (defun test-inifinite-error-protection ()
435 ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used
436 ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that
437 ;; it is tested only once
438 (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--")
439 (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook))
440 (loop repeat 1 do
441 (let ((error-counter 0)
442 (*terminal-io* (make-broadcast-stream)))
443 (assert
444 (not (eq
445 :normal-exit
446 (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher
447 (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s"
448 (incf error-counter)))
449 :normal-exit)))))))
450 (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--"))
452 (enable-debugger)
454 (test-inifinite-error-protection)
456 #+sb-thread
457 (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection)))
458 (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))
460 (disable-debugger)
462 (write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")