1 ;;;; This file contains the definition of the CTYPE (Compiler TYPE)
2 ;;;; structure and related macros used for manipulating it. This is
3 ;;;; sort of a mini object system with rather odd dispatching rules.
4 ;;;; Other compile-time definitions needed by multiple files are also
7 ;;;; FIXME: The comment above about what's in this file is no longer so
8 ;;;; true now that I've split off type-class.lisp. Perhaps we should
9 ;;;; split off CTYPE into the same file as type-class.lisp, rename that
10 ;;;; file to ctype.lisp, move the current comment to the head of that file,
11 ;;;; and write a new comment for this file saying how this file holds
14 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
15 ;;;; more information.
17 ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was
18 ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the
19 ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is
20 ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS
21 ;;;; files for more information.
23 (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
25 (!begin-collecting-cold-init-forms
)
27 ;;; Define the translation from a type-specifier to a type structure for
28 ;;; some particular type. Syntax is identical to DEFTYPE.
29 (defmacro !def-type-translator
(name arglist
&body body
)
30 (declare (type symbol name
))
31 ;; FIXME: Now that the T%CL hack is ancient history and we just use CL
32 ;; instead, we can probably return to using PARSE-DEFMACRO here.
35 ;; This song and dance more or less emulates PARSE-DEFMACRO. The reason for
36 ;; doing this emulation instead of just calling PARSE-DEFMACRO is just that
37 ;; at cross-compile time PARSE-DEFMACRO expects lambda-list keywords in the
38 ;; T%CL package, which is not what we have here. Maybe there's a tidier
39 ;; solution.. (Other than wishing that ANSI had used symbols in the KEYWORD
40 ;; package as lambda list keywords, rather than using symbols in the LISP
42 (multiple-value-bind (whole wholeless-arglist
)
43 (if (eq '&whole
(car arglist
))
44 (values (cadr arglist
) (cddr arglist
))
45 (values (gensym) arglist
))
46 (multiple-value-bind (forms decls
) (parse-body body nil
)
49 (setf (info :type
:translator
',name
)
52 (destructuring-bind ,wholeless-arglist
53 (rest ,whole
) ; discarding NAME
58 ;;; DEFVARs for these come later, after we have enough stuff defined.
59 (declaim (special *wild-type
* *universal-type
* *empty-type
*))
61 ;;; the base class for the internal representation of types
62 (def!struct
(ctype (:conc-name type-
)
64 (:make-load-form-fun make-type-load-form
)
65 #-sb-xc-host
(:pure t
))
66 ;; the class of this type
68 ;; FIXME: It's unnecessarily confusing to have a structure accessor
69 ;; named TYPE-CLASS-INFO which is an accessor for the CTYPE structure
70 ;; even though the TYPE-CLASS structure also exists in the system.
71 ;; Rename this slot: TYPE-CLASS or ASSOCIATED-TYPE-CLASS or something.
72 (class-info (missing-arg) :type type-class
)
73 ;; True if this type has a fixed number of members, and as such
74 ;; could possibly be completely specified in a MEMBER type. This is
75 ;; used by the MEMBER type methods.
76 (enumerable nil
:read-only t
)
77 ;; an arbitrary hash code used in EQ-style hashing of identity
78 ;; (since EQ hashing can't be done portably)
79 (hash-value (random (1+ most-positive-fixnum
))
80 :type
(and fixnum unsigned-byte
)
82 ;; Can this object contain other types? A global property of our
83 ;; implementation (which unfortunately seems impossible to enforce
84 ;; with assertions or other in-the-code checks and constraints) is
85 ;; that subclasses which don't contain other types correspond to
86 ;; disjoint subsets (except of course for the NAMED-TYPE T, which
87 ;; covers everything). So NUMBER-TYPE is disjoint from CONS-TYPE is
88 ;; is disjoint from MEMBER-TYPE and so forth. But types which can
89 ;; contain other types, like HAIRY-TYPE and INTERSECTION-TYPE, can
91 (might-contain-other-types-p nil
:read-only t
))
92 (def!method print-object
((ctype ctype
) stream
)
93 (print-unreadable-object (ctype stream
:type t
)
94 (prin1 (type-specifier ctype
) stream
)))
96 ;;; Just dump it as a specifier. (We'll convert it back upon loading.)
97 (defun make-type-load-form (type)
98 (declare (type ctype type
))
99 `(specifier-type ',(type-specifier type
)))
103 ;;; Look for nice relationships for types that have nice relationships
104 ;;; only when one is a hierarchical subtype of the other.
105 (defun hierarchical-intersection2 (type1 type2
)
106 (multiple-value-bind (subtypep1 win1
) (csubtypep type1 type2
)
107 (multiple-value-bind (subtypep2 win2
) (csubtypep type2 type1
)
108 (cond (subtypep1 type1
)
110 ((and win1 win2
) *empty-type
*)
112 (defun hierarchical-union2 (type1 type2
)
113 (cond ((csubtypep type1 type2
) type2
)
114 ((csubtypep type2 type1
) type1
)
117 ;;; Hash two things (types) down to 8 bits. In CMU CL this was an EQ
118 ;;; hash, but since it now needs to run in vanilla ANSI Common Lisp at
119 ;;; cross-compile time, it's now based on the CTYPE-HASH-VALUE field
122 ;;; FIXME: This was a macro in CMU CL, and is now an INLINE function. Is
123 ;;; it important for it to be INLINE, or could be become an ordinary
124 ;;; function without significant loss? -- WHN 19990413
125 #!-sb-fluid
(declaim (inline type-cache-hash
))
126 (declaim (ftype (function (ctype ctype
) (unsigned-byte 8)) type-cache-hash
))
127 (defun type-cache-hash (type1 type2
)
128 (logand (logxor (ash (type-hash-value type1
) -
3)
129 (type-hash-value type2
))
132 ;;;; cold loading initializations
134 (!defun-from-collected-cold-init-forms
!typedefs-cold-init
)