src/code/cross-condition.lisp

   1 ;;;; cross-compiler-only versions of conditions
   2
   3 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
   4 ;;;; more information.
   5 ;;;;
   6 ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was
   7 ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the
   8 ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is
   9 ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS
  10 ;;;; files for more information.
  11
  12 (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
  13
  14 (define-condition simple-style-warning (simple-condition style-warning) ())
  15 (define-condition format-too-few-args-warning (simple-warning) ())
  16 ;;; in the cross-compiler, this is a full warning.  In the target
  17 ;;; compiler, it will only be a style-warning.
  18 (define-condition format-too-many-args-warning (simple-warning) ())
  19
  20 ;;; KLUDGE: OAOOM warning: see condition.lisp -- we want a full
  21 ;;; definition in the cross-compiler as well, in order to have nice
  22 ;;; error messages instead of complaints of undefined-function
  23 ;;; ENCAPSULATED-CONDITION.
  24 (define-condition encapsulated-condition (condition)
  25   ((condition :initarg :condition :reader encapsulated-condition)))
  26
  27 ;;; KLUDGE: another OAOOM problem, this time to allow conditions with
  28 ;;; REFERENCE-CONDITION in their supercondition list on the host.
  29 ;;; (This doesn't feel like the entirely right solution, it has to be
  30 ;;; said.)  -- CSR, 2004-09-15
  31 (define-condition reference-condition ()
  32   ((references :initarg :references :reader reference-condition-references)))
  33
  34 ;;; KLUDGE: yet another OAOOM.
  35 ;;;
  36 ;;; FIXME: This is clearly one OAOOM KLUDGE too many in a row. When tempted
  37 ;;; to add another one invent DEF!CONDITION or whatever seems necessary,
  38 ;;; and replace these.
  39 (define-condition type-warning (reference-condition simple-warning)
  40   ()
  41   (:default-initargs :references (list '(:sbcl :node "Handling of Types"))))
  42
  43 (define-condition bug (simple-error)
  44   ()
  45   (:report
  46    (lambda (condition stream)
  47      (format stream
  48              "~@<  ~? ~:@_~?~:>"
  49              (simple-condition-format-control condition)
  50              (simple-condition-format-arguments condition)
  51              "~@<If you see this and are an SBCL ~
  52 developer, then it is probable that you have made a change to the ~
  53 system that has broken the ability for SBCL to compile, usually by ~
  54 removing an assumed invariant of the system, but sometimes by making ~
  55 an averrance that is violated (check your code!). If you are a user, ~
  56 please submit a bug report to the developers' mailing list, details of ~
  57 which can be found at <http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/>.~:@>"
  58              ()))))
  59
  60 ;;; These are should never be instantiated before the real definitions
  61 ;;; come in.
  62 (deftype package-lock-violation () nil)
  63 (deftype package-locked-error () nil)
  64 (deftype symbol-package-locked-error () nil)