3 ;;;; tags which are set during the build process and which end up in
4 ;;;; CL:*FEATURES* in the target SBCL, plus some comments about other
5 ;;;; CL:*FEATURES* tags which have special meaning to SBCL or which
6 ;;;; have a special conventional meaning
8 ;;;; Note that the recommended way to customize the features of a
9 ;;;; local build of SBCL is not to edit this file, but instead to
10 ;;;; tweak customize-target-features.lisp. (You must create this file
11 ;;;; first; it is not in the SBCL distribution, and is in fact
12 ;;;; explicitly excluded from the distribution in places like
13 ;;;; .cvsignore.) If you define a function in
14 ;;;; customize-target-features.lisp, it will be used to transform the
15 ;;;; target features list after it's read and before it's used. E.g.,
16 ;;;; you can use code like this:
18 ;;;; (flet ((enable (x) (pushnew x list))
19 ;;;; (disable (x) (setf list (remove x list))))
20 ;;;; #+nil (enable :sb-show)
21 ;;;; (enable :sb-after-xc-core)
22 ;;;; #+nil (disable :sb-doc)
24 ;;;; By thus editing a local file (one which is not in the source
25 ;;;; distribution, and which is in .cvsignore) your customizations
26 ;;;; will remain local even if you do things like "cvs update",
27 ;;;; will not show up if you try to submit a patch with "cvs diff",
28 ;;;; and might even stay out of the way if you use other non-CVS-based
29 ;;;; methods to upgrade the files or store your configuration.
31 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
32 ;;;; more information.
34 ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was
35 ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the
36 ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is
37 ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS
38 ;;;; files for more information.
42 ;; features present in all builds
47 ;; FIXME: Isn't there a :x3jsomething feature which we should set too?
48 ;; No. CLHS says ":x3j13 [...] A conforming implementation might or
49 ;; might not contain such a feature." -- CSR, 2002-02-21
54 ;; Douglas Thomas Crosher's conservative generational GC (the only one
55 ;; we currently support for X86).
56 ;; :gencgc used to be here; CSR moved it into
57 ;; local-target-features.lisp-expr via make-config.sh, as alpha,
58 ;; sparc and ppc ports don't currently support it. -- CSR, 2002-02-21
60 ;; We're running under a UNIX. This is sort of redundant, and it was also
61 ;; sort of redundant under CMU CL, which we inherited it from: neither SBCL
62 ;; nor CMU CL supports anything but UNIX (and "technically not UNIX"es
63 ;; such as *BSD and Linux). But someday, maybe we might, and in that case
64 ;; we'd presumably remove this, so its presence conveys the information
65 ;; that the system isn't one which follows such a change.
69 ;; features present in this particular build
72 ;; Setting this enables the compilation of documentation strings
73 ;; from the system sources into the target Lisp executable.
74 ;; Traditional Common Lisp folk will want this option set.
75 ;; I (WHN) made it optional because I came to Common Lisp from
76 ;; C++ through Scheme, so I'm accustomed to asking
77 ;; Emacs about things that I'm curious about instead of asking
78 ;; the executable I'm running.
81 ;; Do regression and other tests when building the system. You might
82 ;; or might not want this if you're not a developer, depending on how
83 ;; paranoid you are. You probably do want it if you are a developer.
84 ;; This test does not affect the target system (in much the same way
85 ;; as :sb-after-xc-core, below).
88 ;; Make more debugging information available (for debugging SBCL
89 ;; itself). If you aren't hacking or troubleshooting SBCL itself,
90 ;; you probably don't want this set.
92 ;; At least two varieties of debugging information are enabled by this
94 ;; * SBCL is compiled with a higher level of OPTIMIZE DEBUG, so that
95 ;; the debugger can tell more about the state of the system.
96 ;; * Various code to print debugging messages, and similar debugging code,
97 ;; is compiled only when this feature is present.
99 ;; Note that the extra information recorded by the compiler at
100 ;; this higher level of OPTIMIZE DEBUG includes the source location
101 ;; forms. In order for the debugger to use this information, it has to
102 ;; re-READ the source file. In an ordinary installation of SBCL, this
103 ;; re-READing may not work very well, for either of two reasons:
104 ;; * The sources aren't present on the system in the same location that
105 ;; they were on the system where SBCL was compiled.
106 ;; * SBCL is using the standard readtable, without the added hackage
107 ;; which allows it to handle things like target features.
108 ;; If you want to be able to use the extra debugging information,
109 ;; therefore, be sure to keep the sources around, and run with the
110 ;; readtable configured so that the system sources can be read.
113 ;; Build SBCL with the old CMU CL low level debugger, "ldb". In the
114 ;; ideal world you would not need this unless you are messing with
115 ;; SBCL at a very low level (e.g., trying to diagnose GC problems, or
116 ;; trying to debug assembly code for a port to a new CPU). However,
117 ;; experience shows that sooner or later everyone lose()'s, in which
118 ;; case SB-LDB can at least provide an informative backtrace.
121 ;; This isn't really a target Lisp feature at all, but controls
122 ;; whether the build process produces an after-xc.core file. This
123 ;; can be useful for shortening the edit/compile/debug cycle when
124 ;; you modify SBCL's own source code, as in slam.sh. Otherwise
125 ;; you don't need it.
128 ;; Enable extra debugging output in the assem.lisp assembler/scheduler
129 ;; code. (This is the feature which was called :DEBUG in the
130 ;; original CMU CL code.)
133 ;; Setting this makes SBCL more "fluid", i.e. more amenable to
134 ;; modification at runtime, by suppressing various INLINE declarations,
135 ;; compiler macro definitions, FREEZE-TYPE declarations; and by
136 ;; suppressing various burning-our-ships-behind-us actions after
137 ;; initialization is complete; and so forth. This tends to clobber the
138 ;; performance of the system, so unless you have some special need for
139 ;; this when hacking SBCL itself, you don't want this set.
142 ;; Enable code for collecting statistics on usage of various operations,
143 ;; useful for performance tuning of the SBCL system itself. This code
144 ;; is probably pretty stale (having not been tested since the fork from
145 ;; base CMU CL) but might nonetheless be a useful starting point for
146 ;; anyone who wants to collect such statistics in the future.
149 ;; Peter Van Eynde's increase-bulletproofness code for CMU CL
151 ;; Some of the code which was #+high-security before the fork has now
152 ;; been either made unconditional, deleted, or rewritten into
153 ;; unrecognizability, but some remains. What remains is not maintained
154 ;; or tested in current SBCL, but I haven't gone out of my way to
158 ; :high-security-support
160 ;; low-level thread primitives support
162 ;; As of SBCL 0.8, this is only supposed to work in x86 Linux with
163 ;; NPTL support (usually kernel 2.6, though sme Red Hat distributions
164 ;; with older kernels also have it) and is implemented using clone(2)
165 ;; and the %fs segment register. Note that no consistent effort to
166 ;; audit the SBCL library code for thread safety has been performed,
167 ;; so caveat executor.
172 ;; While on linux we are able to use futexes for our locking
173 ;; primitive, on other platforms we don't have this luxury. NJF's
174 ;; lutexes present a locking API similar to the futex-based API that
175 ;; allows for sb-thread support on x86 OS X, Solaris and
180 ;; On some operating systems the FS segment register (used for SBCL's
181 ;; thread local storage) is not reliably preserved in signal
182 ;; handlers, so we need to restore its value from the pthread thread
184 ; :restore-tls-segment-register-from-tls
186 ;; Support for detection of unportable code (when applied to the
187 ;; COMMON-LISP package, or SBCL-internal pacakges) or bad-neighbourly
188 ;; code (when applied to user-level packages), relating to material
189 ;; alteration to packages or to bindings in symbols in packages.
192 ;; Support for the entirety of the 21-bit character space defined by
193 ;; the Unicode consortium, rather than the classical 8-bit ISO-8859-1
197 ;; Support for a full evaluator that can execute all the CL special
198 ;; forms, as opposed to the traditional SBCL evaluator which called
199 ;; COMPILE for everything complicated.
202 ;; Record source location information for variables, classes, conditions,
203 ;; packages, etc. Gives much better information on M-. in Slime, but
204 ;; increases core size by about 100kB.
207 ;; This affects the definition of a lot of things in bignum.lisp. It
208 ;; doesn't seem to be documented anywhere what systems it might apply
209 ;; to. It doesn't seem to be needed for X86 systems anyway.
212 ;; This is set in classic CMU CL, and presumably there it means
213 ;; that the floating point arithmetic implementation
214 ;; conforms to IEEE's standard. Here it definitely means that the
215 ;; floating point arithmetic implementation conforms to IEEE's standard.
216 ;; I (WHN 19990702) haven't tried to verify
217 ;; that it does conform, but it should at least mostly conform (because
218 ;; the underlying x86 hardware tries).
221 ;; CMU CL had, and we inherited, code to support 80-bit LONG-FLOAT on the x86
222 ;; architecture. Nothing has been done to actively destroy the long float
223 ;; support, but it hasn't been thoroughly maintained, and needs at least
224 ;; some maintenance before it will work. (E.g. the LONG-FLOAT-only parts of
225 ;; genesis are still implemented in terms of unportable CMU CL functions
226 ;; which are not longer available at genesis time in SBCL.) A deeper
227 ;; problem is SBCL's bootstrap process implicitly assumes that the
228 ;; cross-compilation host will be able to make the same distinctions
229 ;; between floating point types that it does. This assumption is
230 ;; fundamentally sleazy, even though in practice it's unlikely to break down
231 ;; w.r.t. distinguishing SINGLE-FLOAT from DOUBLE-FLOAT; it's much more
232 ;; likely to break down w.r.t. distinguishing DOUBLE-FLOAT from LONG-FLOAT.
233 ;; Still it's likely to be quite doable to get LONG-FLOAT support working
234 ;; again, if anyone's sufficiently motivated.
237 ;; Some platforms don't use a 32-bit off_t by default, and thus can't
238 ;; handle files larger than 2GB. This feature will control whether
239 ;; we'll try to use platform-specific compilation options to enable a
240 ;; 64-bit off_t. The intent is for this feature to be automatically
241 ;; enabled by make-config.sh on platforms where it's needed and known
242 ;; to work, you shouldn't be enabling it manually. You might however
243 ;; want to disable it, if you need to pass file descriptors to
244 ;; foreign code that uses a 32-bit off_t.
248 ;; miscellaneous notes on other things which could have special significance
249 ;; in the *FEATURES* list
252 ;; Any target feature which affects binary compatibility of fasl files
253 ;; needs to be recorded in *FEATURES-POTENTIALLY-AFFECTING-FASL-FORMAT*
256 ;; notes on the :NIL and :IGNORE features:
258 ;; #+NIL is used to comment out forms. Occasionally #+IGNORE is used
259 ;; for this too. So don't use :NIL or :IGNORE as the names of features..
261 ;; notes on :SB-XC and :SB-XC-HOST features (which aren't controlled by this
262 ;; file, but are instead temporarily pushed onto *FEATURES* or
263 ;; *TARGET-FEATURES* during some phases of cross-compilation):
265 ;; :SB-XC-HOST stands for "cross-compilation host" and is in *FEATURES*
266 ;; during the first phase of cross-compilation bootstrapping, when the
267 ;; host Lisp is being used to compile the cross-compiler.
269 ;; :SB-XC stands for "cross compiler", and is in *FEATURES* during the second
270 ;; phase of cross-compilation bootstrapping, when the cross-compiler is
271 ;; being used to create the first target Lisp.
273 ;; notes on the :SB-ASSEMBLING feature (which isn't controlled by
276 ;; This is a flag for whether we're in the assembler. It's
277 ;; temporarily pushed onto the *FEATURES* list in the setup for
278 ;; the ASSEMBLE-FILE function. It would be a bad idea
279 ;; to use it as a name for a permanent feature.
281 ;; notes on local features (which are set automatically by the
282 ;; configuration script, and should not be set here unless you
283 ;; really, really know what you're doing):
285 ;; machine architecture features:
287 ;; any Intel 386 or better, or compatibles like the AMD K6 or K7
289 ;; any x86-64 CPU running in 64-bit mode
291 ;; DEC/Compaq Alpha CPU
293 ;; any Sun UltraSPARC (possibly also non-Ultras -- currently untested)
299 ;; any MIPS CPU (in little-endian mode with :little-endian -- currently
302 ;; (CMU CL also had a :pentium feature, which affected the definition
303 ;; of some floating point vops. It was present but not enabled or
304 ;; documented in the CMU CL code that SBCL is derived from, and has
305 ;; now been moved to the backend-subfeatures mechanism.)
307 ;; properties derived from the machine architecture
308 ;; :control-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
309 ;; On the X86, the Lisp control stack grows downward. On the
310 ;; other supported CPU architectures as of sbcl-0.7.1.40, the
311 ;; system stack grows upward.
312 ;; Note that there are other stack-related differences between the
313 ;; X86 port and the other ports. E.g. on the X86, the Lisp control
314 ;; stack coincides with the C stack, meaning that on the X86 there's
315 ;; stuff on the control stack that the Lisp-level debugger doesn't
316 ;; understand very well. As of sbcl-0.7.1.40 things like that are
317 ;; just parameterized by #!+X86, but it'd probably be better to
318 ;; use new flags like :CONTROL-STACK-CONTAINS-C-STACK.
320 ;; :stack-allocatable-closures
321 ;; The compiler can allocate dynamic-extent closures on stack.
324 ;; Alien callbacks have been implemented for this platform.
326 ;; :compare-and-swap-vops
327 ;; The backend implements compare-and-swap VOPs.
329 ;; operating system features:
330 ;; :linux = We're intended to run under some version of Linux.
331 ;; :bsd = We're intended to run under some version of BSD Unix. (This
332 ;; is not exclusive with the features which indicate which
333 ;; particular version of BSD we're intended to run under.)
334 ;; :freebsd = We're intended to run under FreeBSD.
335 ;; :openbsd = We're intended to run under OpenBSD.
336 ;; :netbsd = We're intended to run under NetBSD.
337 ;; :darwin = We're intended to run under Darwin (including MacOS X).
338 ;; :sunos = We're intended to run under Solaris user environment
339 ;; with the SunOS kernel.
340 ;; :osf1 = We're intended to run under Tru64 (aka Digital Unix
342 ;; (No others are supported by SBCL as of 0.9.6, but :hpux or :irix
343 ;; support could be ported from CMU CL if anyone is sufficiently
344 ;; motivated to do so, and it'd even be possible, though harder, to
345 ;; port the system to Microsoft Windows.)