1 ;;;; handling UNIX signals
3 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
6 ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was
7 ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the
8 ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is
9 ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS
10 ;;;; files for more information.
12 (in-package "SB!UNIX")
14 ;;;; macros for dynamically enabling and disabling signal handling
16 ;;; Notes on how the without-interrupts/with-interrupts stuff works:
18 ;;; Before invoking the supplied handler for any of the signals that
19 ;;; can be blocked, the C interrupt support code checks to see whether
20 ;;; *interrupts-enabled* has been bound to NIL. If so, it saves the
21 ;;; signal number and the value of the signal mask (from the signal
22 ;;; context), sets the signal mask to block all blockable signals,
23 ;;; sets *interrupt-pending* and returns without handling the signal.
25 ;;; When we drop out the without interrupts, we check to see whether
26 ;;; *INTERRUPT-PENDING* has been set. If so, we call
27 ;;; RECEIVE-PENDING-INTERRUPT, which generates a SIGTRAP. The C code
28 ;;; invokes the handler for the saved signal instead of the SIGTRAP
29 ;;; after replacing the signal mask in the signal context with the
30 ;;; saved value. When that hander returns, the original signal mask is
31 ;;; installed, allowing any other pending signals to be handled.
33 ;;; This means that the cost of WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS is just a special
34 ;;; binding in the case when no signals are delivered (the normal
35 ;;; case). It's only when a signal is actually delivered that we use
36 ;;; any system calls, and by then the cost of the extra system calls
37 ;;; are lost in the noise when compared with the cost of delivering
38 ;;; the signal in the first place.
40 ;;; The conditional bindings done by this code here are worth the
41 ;;; trouble as binding is more expensive then read & test -- so
49 ;;; provided that the first branch is true "often enough".
51 (!defvar
*interrupts-enabled
* t
)
52 (!defvar
*interrupt-pending
* nil
)
53 #!+sb-thruption
(!defvar
*thruption-pending
* nil
)
54 (!defvar
*allow-with-interrupts
* t
)
55 ;;; This is to support signal handlers that want to return to the
56 ;;; interrupted context without leaving anything extra on the stack. A
59 ;;; (without-interrupts
60 ;;; (unblock-deferrable-signals)
61 ;;; (allow-with-interrupts ...))
63 ;;; would not cut it, as upon leaving WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS the pending
64 ;;; handlers is run with stuff from the function in which this is
65 ;;; still on the stack.
66 (!defvar
*unblock-deferrables-on-enabling-interrupts-p
* nil
)
68 (defmacro without-interrupts
(&body body
)
69 "Executes BODY with all deferrable interrupts disabled. Deferrable
70 interrupts arriving during execution of the BODY take effect after BODY has
73 Deferrable interrupts include most blockable POSIX signals, and
74 SB-THREAD:INTERRUPT-THREAD. Does not interfere with garbage collection, and
75 unlike in many traditional Lisps using userspace threads, in SBCL
76 WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS does not inhibit scheduling of other threads.
78 Binds ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS and WITH-LOCAL-INTERRUPTS as a local macros.
80 ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS allows the WITH-INTERRUPTS to take effect during the
81 dynamic scope of its body, unless there is an outer WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS without
82 a corresponding ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS.
84 WITH-LOCAL-INTERRUPTS executes its body with interrupts enabled provided that
85 for there is an ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS for every WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS surrounding
86 the current one. WITH-LOCAL-INTERRUPTS is equivalent to:
88 (allow-with-interrupts (with-interrupts ...))
90 Care must be taken not to let either ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS or
91 WITH-LOCAL-INTERRUPTS appear in a function that escapes from inside the
92 WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS in:
95 ;; The body of the lambda would be executed with WITH-INTERRUPTS allowed
96 ;; regardless of the interrupt policy in effect when it is called.
97 (lambda () (allow-with-interrupts ...)))
100 ;; The body of the lambda would be executed with interrupts enabled
101 ;; regardless of the interrupt policy in effect when it is called.
102 (lambda () (with-local-interrupts ...)))
104 (with-unique-names (outer-allow-with-interrupts without-interrupts-body
)
105 `(dx-flet ((,without-interrupts-body
()
106 (declare (disable-package-locks allow-with-interrupts
107 with-local-interrupts
))
109 ((allow-with-interrupts
111 `(let ((*allow-with-interrupts
*
112 ,',outer-allow-with-interrupts
))
114 (with-local-interrupts
116 `(let ((*allow-with-interrupts
*
117 ,',outer-allow-with-interrupts
)
118 (*interrupts-enabled
*
119 ,',outer-allow-with-interrupts
))
120 (when ,',outer-allow-with-interrupts
121 (when *unblock-deferrables-on-enabling-interrupts-p
*
122 (setq *unblock-deferrables-on-enabling-interrupts-p
*
124 (sb!unix
::unblock-deferrable-signals
))
125 (when (or *interrupt-pending
*
126 #!+sb-thruption
*thruption-pending
*)
127 (receive-pending-interrupt)))
128 (locally ,@with-forms
))))
129 (let ((*interrupts-enabled
* nil
)
130 (,outer-allow-with-interrupts
*allow-with-interrupts
*)
131 (*allow-with-interrupts
* nil
))
132 (declare (ignorable ,outer-allow-with-interrupts
))
133 (declare (enable-package-locks allow-with-interrupts
134 with-local-interrupts
))
136 (if *interrupts-enabled
*
138 (,without-interrupts-body
)
139 ;; If we were interrupted in the protected section,
140 ;; then the interrupts are still blocked and it remains
141 ;; so until the pending interrupt is handled.
143 ;; If we were not interrupted in the protected section,
144 ;; but here, then even if the interrupt handler enters
145 ;; another WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS, the pending interrupt will be
146 ;; handled immediately upon exit from said
147 ;; WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS, so it is as if nothing has happened.
148 (when (or *interrupt-pending
*
149 #!+sb-thruption
*thruption-pending
*)
150 (receive-pending-interrupt)))
151 (,without-interrupts-body
)))))
153 (defmacro with-interrupts
(&body body
)
154 "Executes BODY with deferrable interrupts conditionally enabled. If there
155 are pending interrupts they take effect prior to executing BODY.
157 As interrupts are normally allowed WITH-INTERRUPTS only makes sense if there
158 is an outer WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS with a corresponding ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS:
159 interrupts are not enabled if any outer WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS is not accompanied
160 by ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS."
161 (with-unique-names (allowp enablep
)
162 ;; We could manage without ENABLEP here, but that would require
163 ;; taking extra care not to ever have *ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS* NIL
164 ;; and *INTERRUPTS-ENABLED* T -- instead of risking future breakage
165 ;; we take the tiny hit here.
166 `(let* ((,allowp
*allow-with-interrupts
*)
167 (,enablep
*interrupts-enabled
*)
168 (*interrupts-enabled
* (or ,enablep
,allowp
)))
169 (when (and ,allowp
(not ,enablep
))
170 (when *unblock-deferrables-on-enabling-interrupts-p
*
171 (setq *unblock-deferrables-on-enabling-interrupts-p
* nil
)
172 (sb!unix
::unblock-deferrable-signals
))
173 (when (or *interrupt-pending
*
174 #!+sb-thruption
*thruption-pending
*)
175 (receive-pending-interrupt)))
178 (defmacro allow-with-interrupts
(&body body
)
179 (declare (ignore body
))
180 (error "~S is valid only inside ~S."
181 'allow-with-interrupts
'without-interrupts
))
183 (defmacro with-local-interrupts
(&body body
)
184 (declare (ignore body
))
185 (error "~S is valid only inside ~S."
186 'with-local-interrupts
'without-interrupts
))
188 ;;; A low-level operation that assumes that *INTERRUPTS-ENABLED* is
189 ;;; false, *ALLOW-WITH-INTERRUPTS* is true and deferrable signals are
191 (defun %check-interrupts
()
192 ;; Here we check for pending interrupts first, because reading a
193 ;; special is faster then binding it!
194 (when (or *interrupt-pending
* #!+sb-thruption
*thruption-pending
*)
195 (let ((*interrupts-enabled
* t
))
196 (receive-pending-interrupt))))