| commit | fd5da5c47264a57c7d01507eaf50bf3d288ba8a4 | |
| author | Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> | |
| Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:30:07 +0000 (1 15:30 +0200) | ||
| committer | David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> | |
| Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:38:10 +0000 (23 10:38 +1100) | ||
| tree | 66ba5ce5ef80ac8b7ec2ff58fe7005f8ec631781 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 7735fedaf490cf9213cd8d487272b69a4987c851 | commitdiff |
spapr: Add "slb-size" property to CPU device tree nodes
According to a commit message in the Linux kernel (see here
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b60c31d85a2a
for example), the name of the property that carries the information
about the number of SLB entries should be called "slb-size", and
not "ibm,slb-size". The Linux kernel can deal with both names, but
to be on the safe side we should support the official name, too.
[Now that LoPAPR is public, the relevant requirement can be found in
section C.6.1.8 --dwg]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
According to a commit message in the Linux kernel (see here
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b60c31d85a2a
for example), the name of the property that carries the information
about the number of SLB entries should be called "slb-size", and
not "ibm,slb-size". The Linux kernel can deal with both names, but
to be on the safe side we should support the official name, too.
[Now that LoPAPR is public, the relevant requirement can be found in
section C.6.1.8 --dwg]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
| hw/ppc/spapr.c | diffblobblamehistory |