Merged r158465 through r158660 into branch.
[official-gcc.git] / libstdc++-v3 / doc / html / manual / bk01pt03ch21s03.html
blob7486167b08968561f88045e4818ecd0e9119e763
1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>Deprecated HP/SGI</title><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.75.2" /><meta name="keywords" content="&#10; ISO C++&#10; , &#10; library&#10; " /><link rel="home" href="../spine.html" title="The GNU C++ Library Documentation" /><link rel="up" href="ext_containers.html" title="Chapter 21. Containers" /><link rel="prev" href="bk01pt03ch21s02.html" title="HP/SGI" /><link rel="next" href="ext_utilities.html" title="Chapter 22. Utilities" /></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Deprecated HP/SGI</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="bk01pt03ch21s02.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 21. Containers</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="sect1" title="Deprecated HP/SGI"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a id="manual.ext.containers.deprecated_sgi"></a>Deprecated HP/SGI</h2></div></div></div><p>
4 The SGI hashing classes <code class="classname">hash_set</code> and
5 <code class="classname">hash_set</code> have been deprecated by the
6 unordered_set, unordered_multiset, unordered_map,
7 unordered_multimap containers in TR1 and the upcoming C++0x, and
8 may be removed in future releases.
9 </p><p>The SGI headers</p><pre class="programlisting">
10 &lt;hash_map&gt;
11 &lt;hash_set&gt;
12 &lt;rope&gt;
13 &lt;slist&gt;
14 &lt;rb_tree&gt;
15 </pre><p>are all here;
16 <code class="code">&lt;hash_map&gt;</code> and <code class="code">&lt;hash_set&gt;</code>
17 are deprecated but available as backwards-compatible extensions,
18 as discussed further below. <code class="code">&lt;rope&gt;</code> is the
19 SGI specialization for large strings ("rope,"
20 "large strings," get it? Love that geeky humor.)
21 <code class="code">&lt;slist&gt;</code> is a singly-linked list, for when the
22 doubly-linked <code class="code">list&lt;&gt;</code> is too much space
23 overhead, and <code class="code">&lt;rb_tree&gt;</code> exposes the red-black
24 tree classes used in the implementation of the standard maps and
25 sets.
26 </p><p>Each of the associative containers map, multimap, set, and multiset
27 have a counterpart which uses a
28 <a class="ulink" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/HashFunction.html" target="_top">hashing
29 function</a> to do the arranging, instead of a strict weak ordering
30 function. The classes take as one of their template parameters a
31 function object that will return the hash value; by default, an
32 instantiation of
33 <a class="ulink" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/hash.html" target="_top">hash</a>.
34 You should specialize this functor for your class, or define your own,
35 before trying to use one of the hashing classes.
36 </p><p>The hashing classes support all the usual associative container
37 functions, as well as some extra constructors specifying the number
38 of buckets, etc.
39 </p><p>Why would you want to use a hashing class instead of the
40 <span class="quote"><span class="quote">normal</span></span>implementations? Matt Austern writes:
41 </p><div class="blockquote"><blockquote class="blockquote"><p>
42 <span class="emphasis"><em>[W]ith a well chosen hash function, hash tables
43 generally provide much better average-case performance than
44 binary search trees, and much worse worst-case performance. So
45 if your implementation has hash_map, if you don't mind using
46 nonstandard components, and if you aren't scared about the
47 possibility of pathological cases, you'll probably get better
48 performance from hash_map.
49 </em></span>
50 </p></blockquote></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="bk01pt03ch21s02.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="ext_containers.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">HP/SGI </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../spine.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 22. Utilities</td></tr></table></div></body></html>