1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 -- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
9 -- Copyright (C) 1992-2005, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
11 -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
12 -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
13 -- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
14 -- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15 -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16 -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
17 -- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
18 -- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
19 -- to the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, --
20 -- Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. --
22 -- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
23 -- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 with Binderr
; use Binderr
;
28 with Butil
; use Butil
;
29 with Debug
; use Debug
;
30 with Fname
; use Fname
;
32 with Namet
; use Namet
;
34 with Output
; use Output
;
35 with Targparm
; use Targparm
;
39 -- The following data structures are used to represent the graph that is
40 -- used to determine the elaboration order (using a topological sort).
42 -- The following structures are used to record successors. If A is a
43 -- successor of B in this table, it means that A must be elaborated
44 -- before B is elaborated.
46 type Successor_Id
is new Nat
;
47 -- Identification of single successor entry
49 No_Successor
: constant Successor_Id
:= 0;
50 -- Used to indicate end of list of successors
52 type Elab_All_Id
is new Nat
;
53 -- Identification of Elab_All entry link
55 No_Elab_All_Link
: constant Elab_All_Id
:= 0;
56 -- Used to indicate end of list
58 -- Succ_Reason indicates the reason for a particular elaboration link
62 -- After directly with's Before, so the spec of Before must be
63 -- elaborated before After is elaborated.
66 -- After directly mentions Before in a pragma Elaborate, so the
67 -- body of Before must be elaborate before After is elaborated.
70 -- After either mentions Before directly in a pragma Elaborate_All,
71 -- or mentions a third unit, X, which itself requires that Before be
72 -- elaborated before unit X is elaborated. The Elab_All_Link list
73 -- traces the dependencies in the latter case.
76 -- This is just like Elab_All, except that the elaborate all was not
77 -- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
78 -- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
81 -- This is just like Elab, except that the elaborate was not
82 -- explicitly present in the source, but rather was created by the
83 -- front end, which decided that it was "desirable".
86 -- After is a body, and Before is the corresponding spec
88 -- Successor_Link contains the information for one link
90 type Successor_Link
is record
98 -- Next successor on this list
100 Reason
: Succ_Reason
;
101 -- Reason for this link
104 -- Set True if this link is needed for the special Elaborate_Body
105 -- processing described below.
107 Reason_Unit
: Unit_Id
;
108 -- For Reason = Elab, or Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, records the unit
109 -- containing the pragma leading to the link.
111 Elab_All_Link
: Elab_All_Id
;
112 -- If Reason = Elab_All or Elab_Desirable, then this points to the
113 -- first elment in a list of Elab_All entries that record the with
114 -- chain leading resulting in this particular dependency.
118 -- Note on handling of Elaborate_Body. Basically, if we have a pragma
119 -- Elaborate_Body in a unit, it means that the spec and body have to
120 -- be handled as a single entity from the point of view of determining
121 -- an elaboration order. What we do is to essentially remove the body
122 -- from consideration completely, and transfer all its links (other
123 -- than the spec link) to the spec. Then when then the spec gets chosen,
124 -- we choose the body right afterwards. We mark the links that get moved
125 -- from the body to the spec by setting their Elab_Body flag True, so
126 -- that we can understand what is going on!
128 Succ_First
: constant := 1;
130 package Succ
is new Table
.Table
(
131 Table_Component_Type
=> Successor_Link
,
132 Table_Index_Type
=> Successor_Id
,
133 Table_Low_Bound
=> Succ_First
,
134 Table_Initial
=> 500,
135 Table_Increment
=> 200,
136 Table_Name
=> "Succ");
138 -- For the case of Elaborate_All, the following table is used to record
139 -- chains of with relationships that lead to the Elab_All link. These
140 -- are used solely for diagnostic purposes
142 type Elab_All_Entry
is record
143 Needed_By
: Unit_Name_Type
;
144 -- Name of unit from which referencing unit was with'ed or otherwise
145 -- needed as a result of Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable.
147 Next_Elab
: Elab_All_Id
;
148 -- Link to next entry on chain (No_Elab_All_Link marks end of list)
151 package Elab_All_Entries
is new Table
.Table
(
152 Table_Component_Type
=> Elab_All_Entry
,
153 Table_Index_Type
=> Elab_All_Id
,
154 Table_Low_Bound
=> 1,
155 Table_Initial
=> 2000,
156 Table_Increment
=> 200,
157 Table_Name
=> "Elab_All_Entries");
159 -- A Unit_Node record is built for each active unit
161 type Unit_Node_Record
is record
163 Successors
: Successor_Id
;
164 -- Pointer to list of links for successor nodes
167 -- Number of predecessors for this unit. Normally non-negative, but
168 -- can go negative in the case of units chosen by the diagnose error
169 -- procedure (when cycles are being removed from the graph).
172 -- Forward pointer for list of units with no predecessors
175 -- Position in elaboration order (zero = not placed yet)
178 -- Used in computing transitive closure for elaborate all and
179 -- also in locating cycles and paths in the diagnose routines.
181 Elab_Position
: Natural;
182 -- Initialized to zero. Set non-zero when a unit is chosen and
183 -- placed in the elaboration order. The value represents the
184 -- ordinal position in the elaboration order.
188 package UNR
is new Table
.Table
(
189 Table_Component_Type
=> Unit_Node_Record
,
190 Table_Index_Type
=> Unit_Id
,
191 Table_Low_Bound
=> First_Unit_Entry
,
192 Table_Initial
=> 500,
193 Table_Increment
=> 200,
194 Table_Name
=> "UNR");
197 -- Head of list of items with no predecessors
200 -- Number of entries not yet dealt with
203 -- Current unit, set by Gather_Dependencies, and picked up in Build_Link
204 -- to set the Reason_Unit field of the created dependency link.
206 Num_Chosen
: Natural := 0;
207 -- Number of units chosen in the elaboration order so far
209 -----------------------
210 -- Local Subprograms --
211 -----------------------
213 function Better_Choice
(U1
, U2
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
214 -- U1 and U2 are both permitted candidates for selection as the next unit
215 -- to be elaborated. This function determines whether U1 is a better choice
216 -- than U2, i.e. should be elaborated in preference to U2, based on a set
217 -- of heuristics that establish a friendly and predictable order (see body
218 -- for details). The result is True if U1 is a better choice than U2, and
219 -- False if it is a worse choice, or there is no preference between them.
225 Ea_Id
: Elab_All_Id
:= No_Elab_All_Link
);
226 -- Establish a successor link, Before must be elaborated before After,
227 -- and the reason for the link is R. Ea_Id is the contents to be placed
228 -- in the Elab_All_Link of the entry.
230 procedure Choose
(Chosen
: Unit_Id
);
231 -- Chosen is the next entry chosen in the elaboration order. This
232 -- procedure updates all data structures appropriately.
234 function Corresponding_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Unit_Id
;
235 pragma Inline
(Corresponding_Body
);
236 -- Given a unit which is a spec for which there is a separate body,
237 -- return the unit id of the body. It is an error to call this routine
238 -- with a unit that is not a spec, or which does not have a separate body.
240 function Corresponding_Spec
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Unit_Id
;
241 pragma Inline
(Corresponding_Spec
);
242 -- Given a unit which is a body for which there is a separate spec,
243 -- return the unit id of the spec. It is an error to call this routine
244 -- with a unit that is not a body, or which does not have a separate spec.
246 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem
;
247 -- Called when no elaboration order can be found. Outputs an appropriate
248 -- diagnosis of the problem, and then abandons the bind.
250 procedure Elab_All_Links
253 Reason
: Succ_Reason
;
255 -- Used to compute the transitive closure of elaboration links for an
256 -- Elaborate_All pragma (Reason = Elab_All) or for an indication of
257 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable (Reason = Elab_All_Desirable). Unit After has
258 -- a pragma Elaborate_All or the front end has determined that a reference
259 -- probably requires Elaborate_All is required, and unit Before must be
260 -- previously elaborated. First a link is built making sure that unit
261 -- Before is elaborated before After, then a recursive call ensures that
262 -- we also build links for any units needed by Before (i.e. these units
263 -- must/should also be elaborated before After). Link is used to build
264 -- a chain of Elab_All_Entries to explain the reason for a link. The
265 -- value passed is the chain so far.
267 procedure Elab_Error_Msg
(S
: Successor_Id
);
268 -- Given a successor link, outputs an error message of the form
269 -- "& must be elaborated before & ..." where ... is the reason.
271 procedure Gather_Dependencies
;
272 -- Compute dependencies, building the Succ and UNR tables
274 function Make_Elab_Entry
275 (Unam
: Unit_Name_Type
;
276 Link
: Elab_All_Id
) return Elab_All_Id
;
277 -- Make an Elab_All_Entries table entry with the given Unam and Link
279 function Unit_Id_Of
(Uname
: Unit_Name_Type
) return Unit_Id
;
280 -- This function uses the Info field set in the names table to obtain
281 -- the unit Id of a unit, given its name id value.
283 function Worse_Choice
(U1
, U2
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
284 -- This is like Better_Choice, and has the same interface, but returns
285 -- true if U1 is a worse choice than U2 in the sense of the -h (horrible
286 -- elaboration order) switch. We still have to obey Ada rules, so it is
287 -- not quite the direct inverse of Better_Choice.
289 procedure Write_Dependencies
;
290 -- Write out dependencies (called only if appropriate option is set)
292 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain
(S
: Successor_Id
);
293 -- If the reason for the link S is Elaborate_All or Elaborate_Desirable,
294 -- then this routine will output the "needed by" explanation chain.
300 function Better_Choice
(U1
, U2
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
302 function Body_Unit
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
303 -- Determines if given unit is a body
305 function Waiting_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
306 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
307 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
309 function Body_Unit
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
311 return Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
312 or else Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body_Only
;
315 function Waiting_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
317 return Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
318 and then UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U
)).Elab_Position
/= 0;
321 -- Start of processing for Better_Choice
323 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
324 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
327 -- Prefer a waiting body to any other case
329 if Waiting_Body
(U1
) and not Waiting_Body
(U2
) then
332 elsif Waiting_Body
(U2
) and not Waiting_Body
(U1
) then
335 -- Prefer a predefined unit to a non-predefined unit
337 elsif Units
.Table
(U1
).Predefined
338 and not Units
.Table
(U2
).Predefined
342 elsif Units
.Table
(U2
).Predefined
343 and not Units
.Table
(U1
).Predefined
347 -- Prefer an internal unit to a non-internal unit
349 elsif Units
.Table
(U1
).Internal
350 and not Units
.Table
(U2
).Internal
354 elsif Units
.Table
(U2
).Internal
355 and not Units
.Table
(U1
).Internal
359 -- Prefer a body to a spec
361 elsif Body_Unit
(U1
) and not Body_Unit
(U2
) then
364 elsif Body_Unit
(U2
) and not Body_Unit
(U1
) then
367 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
368 -- more recently elaborated. Consider the following:
374 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
375 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
376 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
377 -- to put the body of B first.
379 elsif Waiting_Body
(U1
) and then Waiting_Body
(U2
) then
381 UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U1
)).Elab_Position
>
382 UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U2
)).Elab_Position
;
384 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order
387 return Uname_Less
(Units
.Table
(U1
).Uname
, Units
.Table
(U2
).Uname
);
399 Ea_Id
: Elab_All_Id
:= No_Elab_All_Link
)
405 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Before
:= Before
;
406 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Next
:= UNR
.Table
(Before
).Successors
;
407 UNR
.Table
(Before
).Successors
:= Succ
.Last
;
408 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Reason
:= R
;
409 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Reason_Unit
:= Cur_Unit
;
410 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Elab_All_Link
:= Ea_Id
;
412 -- Deal with special Elab_Body case. If the After of this link is
413 -- a body whose spec has Elaborate_All set, and this is not the link
414 -- directly from the body to the spec, then we make the After of the
415 -- link reference its spec instead, marking the link appropriately.
417 if Units
.Table
(After
).Utype
= Is_Body
then
418 Cspec
:= Corresponding_Spec
(After
);
420 if Units
.Table
(Cspec
).Elaborate_Body
421 and then Cspec
/= Before
423 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).After
:= Cspec
;
424 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Elab_Body
:= True;
425 UNR
.Table
(Cspec
).Num_Pred
:= UNR
.Table
(Cspec
).Num_Pred
+ 1;
430 -- Fall through on normal case
432 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).After
:= After
;
433 Succ
.Table
(Succ
.Last
).Elab_Body
:= False;
434 UNR
.Table
(After
).Num_Pred
:= UNR
.Table
(After
).Num_Pred
+ 1;
441 procedure Choose
(Chosen
: Unit_Id
) is
447 Write_Str
("Choosing Unit ");
448 Write_Unit_Name
(Units
.Table
(Chosen
).Uname
);
452 -- Add to elaboration order. Note that units having no elaboration
453 -- code are not treated specially yet. The special casing of this
454 -- is in Bindgen, where Gen_Elab_Calls skips over them. Meanwhile
455 -- we need them here, because the object file list is also driven
456 -- by the contents of the Elab_Order table.
458 Elab_Order
.Increment_Last
;
459 Elab_Order
.Table
(Elab_Order
.Last
) := Chosen
;
461 -- Remove from No_Pred list. This is a little inefficient and may
462 -- be we should doubly link the list, but it will do for now!
464 if No_Pred
= Chosen
then
465 No_Pred
:= UNR
.Table
(Chosen
).Nextnp
;
468 -- Note that we just ignore the situation where it does not
469 -- appear in the No_Pred list, this happens in calls from the
470 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem routine, where cycles are being
471 -- removed arbitrarily from the graph.
474 while U
/= No_Unit_Id
loop
475 if UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
= Chosen
then
476 UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
:= UNR
.Table
(Chosen
).Nextnp
;
480 U
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
;
484 -- For all successors, decrement the number of predecessors, and
485 -- if it becomes zero, then add to no predecessor list.
487 S
:= UNR
.Table
(Chosen
).Successors
;
488 while S
/= No_Successor
loop
489 U
:= Succ
.Table
(S
).After
;
490 UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
- 1;
493 Write_Str
(" decrementing Num_Pred for unit ");
494 Write_Unit_Name
(Units
.Table
(U
).Uname
);
495 Write_Str
(" new value = ");
496 Write_Int
(Int
(UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
));
500 if UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
= 0 then
501 UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
:= No_Pred
;
505 S
:= Succ
.Table
(S
).Next
;
508 -- All done, adjust number of units left count and set elaboration pos
510 Num_Left
:= Num_Left
- 1;
511 Num_Chosen
:= Num_Chosen
+ 1;
512 UNR
.Table
(Chosen
).Elab_Position
:= Num_Chosen
;
513 Units
.Table
(Chosen
).Elab_Position
:= Num_Chosen
;
515 -- If we just chose a spec with Elaborate_Body set, then we
516 -- must immediately elaborate the body, before any other units.
518 if Units
.Table
(Chosen
).Elaborate_Body
then
520 -- If the unit is a spec only, then there is no body. This is a bit
521 -- odd given that Elaborate_Body is here, but it is valid in an
522 -- RCI unit, where we only have the interface in the stub bind.
524 if Units
.Table
(Chosen
).Utype
= Is_Spec_Only
525 and then Units
.Table
(Chosen
).RCI
529 Choose
(Corresponding_Body
(Chosen
));
534 ------------------------
535 -- Corresponding_Body --
536 ------------------------
538 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
539 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
540 -- first and the spec appearing second.
542 function Corresponding_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Unit_Id
is
544 pragma Assert
(Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Spec
);
546 end Corresponding_Body
;
548 ------------------------
549 -- Corresponding_Spec --
550 ------------------------
552 -- Currently if the body and spec are separate, then they appear as
553 -- two separate units in the same ALI file, with the body appearing
554 -- first and the spec appearing second.
556 function Corresponding_Spec
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Unit_Id
is
558 pragma Assert
(Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
);
560 end Corresponding_Spec
;
562 ----------------------------------
563 -- Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem --
564 ----------------------------------
566 procedure Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem
is
568 function Find_Path
(Ufrom
, Uto
: Unit_Id
; ML
: Nat
) return Boolean;
569 -- Recursive routine used to find a path from node Ufrom to node Uto.
570 -- If a path exists, returns True and outputs an appropriate set of
571 -- error messages giving the path. Also calls Choose for each of the
572 -- nodes so that they get removed from the remaining set. There are
573 -- two cases of calls, either Ufrom = Uto for an attempt to find a
574 -- cycle, or Ufrom is a spec and Uto the corresponding body for the
575 -- case of an unsatisfiable Elaborate_Body pragma. ML is the minimum
576 -- acceptable length for a path.
582 function Find_Path
(Ufrom
, Uto
: Unit_Id
; ML
: Nat
) return Boolean is
584 function Find_Link
(U
: Unit_Id
; PL
: Nat
) return Boolean;
585 -- This is the inner recursive routine, it determines if a path
586 -- exists from U to Uto, and if so returns True and outputs the
587 -- appropriate set of error messages. PL is the path length
593 function Find_Link
(U
: Unit_Id
; PL
: Nat
) return Boolean is
597 -- Recursion ends if we are at terminating node and the path
598 -- is sufficiently long, generate error message and return True.
600 if U
= Uto
and then PL
>= ML
then
604 -- All done if already visited, otherwise mark as visited
606 elsif UNR
.Table
(U
).Visited
then
609 -- Otherwise mark as visited and look at all successors
612 UNR
.Table
(U
).Visited
:= True;
614 S
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Successors
;
615 while S
/= No_Successor
loop
616 if Find_Link
(Succ
.Table
(S
).After
, PL
+ 1) then
622 S
:= Succ
.Table
(S
).Next
;
625 -- Falling through means this does not lead to a path
631 -- Start of processing for Find_Path
634 -- Initialize all non-chosen nodes to not visisted yet
636 for U
in Units
.First
.. Units
.Last
loop
637 UNR
.Table
(U
).Visited
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Elab_Position
/= 0;
640 -- Now try to find the path
642 return Find_Link
(Ufrom
, 0);
645 -- Start of processing for Diagnose_Elaboration_Error
650 -- Output state of things if debug flag N set
659 Write_Str
("Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem called");
661 Write_Str
("List of remaining unchosen units and predecessors");
664 for U
in Units
.First
.. Units
.Last
loop
665 if UNR
.Table
(U
).Elab_Position
= 0 then
666 NP
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
;
668 Write_Str
(" Unchosen unit: #");
671 Write_Unit_Name
(Units
.Table
(U
).Uname
);
672 Write_Str
(" (Num_Pred = ");
678 if Units
.Table
(U
).Elaborate_Body
then
680 (" (not chosen because of Elaborate_Body)");
683 Write_Str
(" ****************** why not chosen?");
688 -- Search links list to find unchosen predecessors
690 for S
in Succ
.First
.. Succ
.Last
loop
692 SL
: Successor_Link
renames Succ
.Table
(S
);
696 and then UNR
.Table
(SL
.Before
).Elab_Position
= 0
698 Write_Str
(" unchosen predecessor: #");
699 Write_Int
(Int
(SL
.Before
));
701 Write_Unit_Name
(Units
.Table
(SL
.Before
).Uname
);
709 Write_Str
(" **************** Num_Pred value wrong!");
717 -- Output the header for the error, and manually increment the
718 -- error count. We are using Error_Msg_Output rather than Error_Msg
719 -- here for two reasons:
721 -- This is really only one error, not one for each line
722 -- We want this output on standard output since it is voluminous
724 -- But we do need to deal with the error count manually in this case
726 Errors_Detected
:= Errors_Detected
+ 1;
727 Error_Msg_Output
("elaboration circularity detected", Info
=> False);
729 -- Try to find cycles starting with any of the remaining nodes that have
730 -- not yet been chosen. There must be at least one (there is some reason
731 -- we are being called!)
733 for U
in Units
.First
.. Units
.Last
loop
734 if UNR
.Table
(U
).Elab_Position
= 0 then
735 if Find_Path
(U
, U
, 1) then
736 raise Unrecoverable_Error
;
741 -- We should never get here, since we were called for some reason,
742 -- and we should have found and eliminated at least one bad path.
745 end Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem
;
751 procedure Elab_All_Links
754 Reason
: Succ_Reason
;
758 if UNR
.Table
(Before
).Visited
then
762 -- Build the direct link for Before
764 UNR
.Table
(Before
).Visited
:= True;
765 Build_Link
(Before
, After
, Reason
, Link
);
767 -- Process all units with'ed by Before recursively
770 Units
.Table
(Before
).First_With
.. Units
.Table
(Before
).Last_With
772 -- Skip if this with is an interface to a stand-alone library.
773 -- Skip also if no ALI file for this with, happens with certain
774 -- specialized generic files that do not get compiled.
776 if not Withs
.Table
(W
).SAL_Interface
777 and then Withs
.Table
(W
).Afile
/= No_File
778 and then Generic_Separately_Compiled
(Withs
.Table
(W
).Sfile
)
781 (Unit_Id_Of
(Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
),
784 Make_Elab_Entry
(Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
, Link
));
788 -- Process corresponding body, if there is one
790 if Units
.Table
(Before
).Utype
= Is_Spec
then
792 (Corresponding_Body
(Before
),
795 (Units
.Table
(Corresponding_Body
(Before
)).Uname
, Link
));
803 procedure Elab_Error_Msg
(S
: Successor_Id
) is
804 SL
: Successor_Link
renames Succ
.Table
(S
);
807 -- Nothing to do if internal unit involved and no -da flag
811 (Is_Internal_File_Name
(Units
.Table
(SL
.Before
).Sfile
)
813 Is_Internal_File_Name
(Units
.Table
(SL
.After
).Sfile
))
818 -- Here we want to generate output
820 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.Before
).Uname
;
823 Error_Msg_Name_2
:= Units
.Table
(Corresponding_Body
(SL
.After
)).Uname
;
825 Error_Msg_Name_2
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.After
).Uname
;
828 Error_Msg_Output
(" & must be elaborated before &", Info
=> True);
830 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.Reason_Unit
).Uname
;
835 (" reason: with clause",
840 (" reason: pragma Elaborate in unit &",
845 (" reason: pragma Elaborate_All in unit &",
848 when Elab_All_Desirable
=>
850 (" reason: implicit Elaborate_All in unit &",
854 (" recompile & with -gnatwl for full details",
857 when Elab_Desirable
=>
859 (" reason: implicit Elaborate in unit &",
863 (" recompile & with -gnatwl for full details",
868 (" reason: spec always elaborated before body",
872 Write_Elab_All_Chain
(S
);
875 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.Before
).Uname
;
876 Error_Msg_Name_2
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.After
).Uname
;
878 (" & must therefore be elaborated before &",
881 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Units
.Table
(SL
.After
).Uname
;
883 (" (because & has a pragma Elaborate_Body)",
890 ---------------------
891 -- Find_Elab_Order --
892 ---------------------
894 procedure Find_Elab_Order
is
896 Best_So_Far
: Unit_Id
;
900 Num_Left
:= Int
(Units
.Last
- Units
.First
+ 1);
902 -- Initialize unit table for elaboration control
904 for U
in Units
.First
.. Units
.Last
loop
906 UNR
.Table
(UNR
.Last
).Successors
:= No_Successor
;
907 UNR
.Table
(UNR
.Last
).Num_Pred
:= 0;
908 UNR
.Table
(UNR
.Last
).Nextnp
:= No_Unit_Id
;
909 UNR
.Table
(UNR
.Last
).Elab_Order
:= 0;
910 UNR
.Table
(UNR
.Last
).Elab_Position
:= 0;
913 -- Output warning if -p used with no -gnatE units
915 if Pessimistic_Elab_Order
916 and not Dynamic_Elaboration_Checks_Specified
918 if OpenVMS_On_Target
then
919 Error_Msg
("?use of /PESSIMISTIC_ELABORATION questionable");
921 Error_Msg
("?use of -p switch questionable");
924 Error_Msg
("?since all units compiled with static elaboration model");
927 -- Gather dependencies and output them if option set
931 -- Output elaboration dependencies if option is set
933 if Elab_Dependency_Output
or Debug_Flag_E
then
937 -- Initialize the no predecessor list
939 No_Pred
:= No_Unit_Id
;
941 for U
in UNR
.First
.. UNR
.Last
loop
942 if UNR
.Table
(U
).Num_Pred
= 0 then
943 UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
:= No_Pred
;
948 -- OK, now we determine the elaboration order proper. All we do is to
949 -- select the best choice from the no predecessor list until all the
950 -- nodes have been chosen.
954 -- If there are no nodes with predecessors, then either we are
955 -- done, as indicated by Num_Left being set to zero, or we have
956 -- a circularity. In the latter case, diagnose the circularity,
957 -- removing it from the graph and continue
959 Get_No_Pred
: while No_Pred
= No_Unit_Id
loop
960 exit Outer
when Num_Left
< 1;
961 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem
;
962 end loop Get_No_Pred
;
965 Best_So_Far
:= No_Unit_Id
;
967 -- Loop to choose best entry in No_Pred list
969 No_Pred_Search
: loop
971 Write_Str
(" considering choice of ");
972 Write_Unit_Name
(Units
.Table
(U
).Uname
);
975 if Units
.Table
(U
).Elaborate_Body
then
977 (" Elaborate_Body = True, Num_Pred for body = ");
979 (Int
(UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Body
(U
)).Num_Pred
));
982 (" Elaborate_Body = False");
988 -- This is a candididate to be considered for choice
990 if Best_So_Far
= No_Unit_Id
991 or else ((not Pessimistic_Elab_Order
)
992 and then Better_Choice
(U
, Best_So_Far
))
993 or else (Pessimistic_Elab_Order
994 and then Worse_Choice
(U
, Best_So_Far
))
997 Write_Str
(" tentatively chosen (best so far)");
1004 U
:= UNR
.Table
(U
).Nextnp
;
1005 exit No_Pred_Search
when U
= No_Unit_Id
;
1006 end loop No_Pred_Search
;
1008 -- If no candididate chosen, it means that no unit has No_Pred = 0,
1009 -- but there are units left, hence we have a circular dependency,
1010 -- which we will get Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem to diagnose it.
1012 if Best_So_Far
= No_Unit_Id
then
1013 Diagnose_Elaboration_Problem
;
1015 -- Otherwise choose the best candidate found
1018 Choose
(Best_So_Far
);
1022 end Find_Elab_Order
;
1024 -------------------------
1025 -- Gather_Dependencies --
1026 -------------------------
1028 procedure Gather_Dependencies
is
1029 Withed_Unit
: Unit_Id
;
1032 -- Loop through all units
1034 for U
in Units
.First
.. Units
.Last
loop
1037 -- If this is not an interface to a stand-alone library and
1038 -- there is a body and a spec, then spec must be elaborated first
1039 -- Note that the corresponding spec immediately follows the body
1041 if not Units
.Table
(U
).SAL_Interface
1042 and then Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
1044 Build_Link
(Corresponding_Spec
(U
), U
, Spec_First
);
1047 -- If this unit is not an interface to a stand-alone library,
1048 -- process WITH references for this unit ignoring generic units and
1049 -- interfaces to stand-alone libraries.
1051 if not Units
.Table
(U
).SAL_Interface
then
1053 W
in Units
.Table
(U
).First_With
.. Units
.Table
(U
).Last_With
1055 if Withs
.Table
(W
).Sfile
/= No_File
1056 and then (not Withs
.Table
(W
).SAL_Interface
)
1058 -- Check for special case of withing a unit that does not
1059 -- exist any more. If the unit was completely missing we
1060 -- would already have detected this, but a nasty case arises
1061 -- when we have a subprogram body with no spec, and some
1062 -- obsolete unit with's a previous (now disappeared) spec.
1064 if Get_Name_Table_Info
(Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
) = 0 then
1065 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Units
.Table
(U
).Sfile
;
1066 Error_Msg_Name_2
:= Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
;
1067 Error_Msg
("% depends on & which no longer exists");
1072 Unit_Id
(Unit_Id_Of
(Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
));
1074 -- Pragma Elaborate_All case, for this we use the recursive
1075 -- Elab_All_Links procedure to establish the links.
1077 if Withs
.Table
(W
).Elaborate_All
then
1079 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1082 for Uref
in UNR
.First
.. UNR
.Last
loop
1083 UNR
.Table
(Uref
).Visited
:= False;
1086 -- Now establish all the links we need
1089 (Withed_Unit
, U
, Elab_All
,
1091 (Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
, No_Elab_All_Link
));
1093 -- Elaborate_All_Desirable case, for this we establish
1094 -- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1096 elsif Withs
.Table
(W
).Elab_All_Desirable
then
1098 -- Reset flags used to stop multiple visits to a given
1101 for Uref
in UNR
.First
.. UNR
.Last
loop
1102 UNR
.Table
(Uref
).Visited
:= False;
1105 -- Now establish all the links we need
1108 (Withed_Unit
, U
, Elab_All_Desirable
,
1110 (Withs
.Table
(W
).Uname
, No_Elab_All_Link
));
1112 -- Pragma Elaborate case. We must build a link for the
1113 -- withed unit itself, and also the corresponding body
1116 -- However, skip this processing if there is no ALI file
1117 -- for the WITH entry, because this means it is a
1118 -- generic (even when we fix the generics so that an ALI
1119 -- file is present, we probably still will have no ALI
1120 -- file for unchecked and other special cases).
1122 elsif Withs
.Table
(W
).Elaborate
1123 and then Withs
.Table
(W
).Afile
/= No_File
1125 Build_Link
(Withed_Unit
, U
, Withed
);
1127 if Units
.Table
(Withed_Unit
).Utype
= Is_Spec
then
1129 (Corresponding_Body
(Withed_Unit
), U
, Elab
);
1132 -- Elaborate_Desirable case, for this we establish
1133 -- the same links as above, but with a different reason.
1135 elsif Withs
.Table
(W
).Elab_Desirable
then
1136 Build_Link
(Withed_Unit
, U
, Withed
);
1138 if Units
.Table
(Withed_Unit
).Utype
= Is_Spec
then
1140 (Corresponding_Body
(Withed_Unit
),
1144 -- Case of normal WITH with no elaboration pragmas, just
1145 -- build the single link to the directly referenced unit
1148 Build_Link
(Withed_Unit
, U
, Withed
);
1157 end Gather_Dependencies
;
1159 ---------------------
1160 -- Make_Elab_Entry --
1161 ---------------------
1163 function Make_Elab_Entry
1164 (Unam
: Unit_Name_Type
;
1165 Link
: Elab_All_Id
) return Elab_All_Id
1168 Elab_All_Entries
.Increment_Last
;
1169 Elab_All_Entries
.Table
(Elab_All_Entries
.Last
).Needed_By
:= Unam
;
1170 Elab_All_Entries
.Table
(Elab_All_Entries
.Last
).Next_Elab
:= Link
;
1171 return Elab_All_Entries
.Last
;
1172 end Make_Elab_Entry
;
1178 function Unit_Id_Of
(Uname
: Unit_Name_Type
) return Unit_Id
is
1179 Info
: constant Int
:= Get_Name_Table_Info
(Uname
);
1181 pragma Assert
(Info
/= 0 and then Unit_Id
(Info
) /= No_Unit_Id
);
1182 return Unit_Id
(Info
);
1189 function Worse_Choice
(U1
, U2
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
1191 function Body_Unit
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
1192 -- Determines if given unit is a body
1194 function Waiting_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean;
1195 -- Determines if U is a waiting body, defined as a body which has
1196 -- not been elaborated, but whose spec has been elaborated.
1202 function Body_Unit
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
1204 return Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
1205 or else Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body_Only
;
1212 function Waiting_Body
(U
: Unit_Id
) return Boolean is
1214 return Units
.Table
(U
).Utype
= Is_Body
and then
1215 UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U
)).Elab_Position
/= 0;
1218 -- Start of processing for Worse_Choice
1221 -- Note: the checks here are applied in sequence, and the ordering is
1222 -- significant (i.e. the more important criteria are applied first).
1224 -- If either unit is internal, then use Better_Choice, since the
1225 -- language requires that predefined units not mess up in the choice
1226 -- of elaboration order, and for internal units, any problems are
1227 -- ours and not the programmers.
1229 if Units
.Table
(U1
).Internal
or else Units
.Table
(U2
).Internal
then
1230 return Better_Choice
(U1
, U2
);
1232 -- Prefer anything else to a waiting body (!)
1234 elsif Waiting_Body
(U1
) and not Waiting_Body
(U2
) then
1237 elsif Waiting_Body
(U2
) and not Waiting_Body
(U1
) then
1240 -- Prefer a spec to a body (!)
1242 elsif Body_Unit
(U1
) and not Body_Unit
(U2
) then
1245 elsif Body_Unit
(U2
) and not Body_Unit
(U1
) then
1248 -- If both are waiting bodies, then prefer the one whose spec is
1249 -- less recently elaborated. Consider the following:
1255 -- The normal waiting body preference would have placed the body of
1256 -- A before the spec of B if it could. Since it could not, there it
1257 -- must be the case that A depends on B. It is therefore a good idea
1258 -- to put the body of B last so that if there is an elaboration order
1259 -- problem, we will find it (that's what horrible order is about)
1261 elsif Waiting_Body
(U1
) and then Waiting_Body
(U2
) then
1263 UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U1
)).Elab_Position
<
1264 UNR
.Table
(Corresponding_Spec
(U2
)).Elab_Position
;
1266 -- Otherwise decide on the basis of alphabetical order. We do not try
1267 -- to reverse the usual choice here, since it can cause cancelling
1268 -- errors with the other inversions.
1271 return Uname_Less
(Units
.Table
(U1
).Uname
, Units
.Table
(U2
).Uname
);
1275 ------------------------
1276 -- Write_Dependencies --
1277 ------------------------
1279 procedure Write_Dependencies
is
1283 (" ELABORATION ORDER DEPENDENCIES");
1287 Info_Prefix_Suppress
:= True;
1289 for S
in Succ_First
.. Succ
.Last
loop
1293 Info_Prefix_Suppress
:= False;
1295 end Write_Dependencies
;
1297 --------------------------
1298 -- Write_Elab_All_Chain --
1299 --------------------------
1301 procedure Write_Elab_All_Chain
(S
: Successor_Id
) is
1302 ST
: constant Successor_Link
:= Succ
.Table
(S
);
1303 After
: constant Unit_Name_Type
:= Units
.Table
(ST
.After
).Uname
;
1306 Nam
: Unit_Name_Type
;
1308 First_Name
: Boolean := True;
1311 if ST
.Reason
in Elab_All
.. Elab_All_Desirable
then
1312 L
:= ST
.Elab_All_Link
;
1313 while L
/= No_Elab_All_Link
loop
1314 Nam
:= Elab_All_Entries
.Table
(L
).Needed_By
;
1315 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Nam
;
1316 Error_Msg_Output
(" &", Info
=> True);
1318 Get_Name_String
(Nam
);
1320 if Name_Buffer
(Name_Len
) = 'b' then
1323 (" must be elaborated along with its spec:",
1328 (" which must be elaborated " &
1329 "along with its spec:",
1341 (" which is withed by:",
1346 First_Name
:= False;
1348 L
:= Elab_All_Entries
.Table
(L
).Next_Elab
;
1351 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= After
;
1352 Error_Msg_Output
(" &", Info
=> True);
1354 end Write_Elab_All_Chain
;