1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 -- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
9 -- Copyright (C) 1992-2009, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
11 -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
12 -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
13 -- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
14 -- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15 -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16 -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
17 -- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
18 -- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
19 -- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
21 -- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
22 -- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26 with Namet
.Sp
; use Namet
.Sp
;
27 with Stringt
; use Stringt
;
28 with Uintp
; use Uintp
;
30 with GNAT
.Spelling_Checker
; use GNAT
.Spelling_Checker
;
39 type End_Action_Type
is (
40 -- Type used to describe the result of the Pop_End_Context call
43 -- Current end sequence is entirely c correct. In this case Token and
44 -- the scan pointer are left pointing past the end sequence (i.e. they
45 -- are unchanged from the values set on entry to Pop_End_Context).
48 -- Current end sequence is to be left in place to satisfy some outer
49 -- scope. Token and the scan pointer are set to point to the end
50 -- token, and should be left there. A message has been generated
51 -- indicating a missing end sequence. This status is also used for
52 -- the case when no end token is present.
55 -- The end sequence is incorrect (and an error message has been
56 -- posted), but it will still be accepted. In this case Token and
57 -- the scan pointer point back to the end token, and the caller
58 -- should skip past the end sequence before proceeding.
61 -- The end sequence is judged to belong to an unrecognized inner
62 -- scope. An appropriate message has been issued and the caller
63 -- should skip past the end sequence and then proceed as though
64 -- no end sequence had been encountered.
66 End_Action
: End_Action_Type
;
67 -- The variable set by Pop_End_Context call showing which of the four
68 -- decisions described above is judged the best.
70 End_Sloc
: Source_Ptr
;
71 -- Source location of END token
74 -- Set False if error is found in END line
76 End_Column
: Column_Number
;
79 End_Type
: SS_End_Type
;
80 -- Type of END expected. The special value E_Dummy is set to indicate that
81 -- no END token was present (so a missing END inserted message is needed)
84 -- Node_Id value for explicit name on END line, or for compiler supplied
85 -- name in the case where an optional name is not given. Empty if no name
86 -- appears. If non-empty, then it is either an N_Designator node for a
87 -- child unit or a node with a Chars field identifying the actual label.
89 End_Labl_Present
: Boolean;
90 -- Indicates that the value in End_Labl was for an explicit label
93 -- Set True if the entry is syntactically correct
96 -- Set True if the keyword in the END sequence matches, or if neither
97 -- the END sequence nor the END stack entry has a keyword.
100 -- Set True if both the END sequence and the END stack entry contained
101 -- labels (other than No_Name or Error_Name) and the labels matched.
102 -- This is a stronger condition than SYNTAX_OK, since it means that a
103 -- label was present, even in a case where it was optional. Note that
104 -- the case of no label required, and no label present does NOT set
105 -- Label_OK to True, it is True only if a positive label match is found.
108 -- Column_OK is set True if the END sequence appears in the expected column
110 Scan_State
: Saved_Scan_State
;
111 -- Save state at start of END sequence, in case we decide not to eat it up
113 -----------------------
114 -- Local Subprograms --
115 -----------------------
117 procedure Evaluate_End_Entry
(SS_Index
: Nat
);
118 -- Compare scanned END entry (as recorded by a prior call to P_End_Scan)
119 -- with a specified entry in the scope stack (the single parameter is the
120 -- entry index in the scope stack). Note that Scan is not called. The above
121 -- variables xxx_OK are set to indicate the result of the evaluation.
123 function Explicit_Start_Label
(SS_Index
: Nat
) return Boolean;
124 -- Determines whether the specified entry in the scope stack has an
125 -- explicit start label (i.e. one other than one that was created by
126 -- the parser when no explicit label was present)
128 procedure Output_End_Deleted
;
129 -- Output a message complaining that the current END structure does not
130 -- match anything and is being deleted.
132 procedure Output_End_Expected
(Ins
: Boolean);
133 -- Output a message at the start of the current token which is always an
134 -- END, complaining that the END is not of the right form. The message
135 -- indicates the expected form. The information for the message is taken
136 -- from the top entry in the scope stack. The Ins parameter is True if
137 -- an end is being inserted, and false if an existing end is being
138 -- replaced. Note that in the case of a suspicious IS for the Ins case,
139 -- we do not output the message, but instead simply mark the scope stack
140 -- entry as being a case of a bad IS.
142 procedure Output_End_Missing
;
143 -- Output a message just before the current token, complaining that the
144 -- END is not of the right form. The message indicates the expected form.
145 -- The information for the message is taken from the top entry in the
146 -- scope stack. Note that in the case of a suspicious IS, we do not output
147 -- the message, but instead simply mark the scope stack entry as a bad IS.
149 procedure Pop_End_Context
;
150 -- Pop_End_Context is called after processing a construct, to pop the
151 -- top entry off the end stack. It decides on the appropriate action to
152 -- to take, signalling the result by setting End_Action as described in
153 -- the global variable section.
155 function Same_Label
(Label1
, Label2
: Node_Id
) return Boolean;
156 -- This function compares the two names associated with the given nodes.
157 -- If they are both simple (i.e. have Chars fields), then they have to
158 -- be the same name. Otherwise they must both be N_Selected_Component
159 -- nodes, referring to the same set of names, or Label1 is an N_Designator
160 -- referring to the same set of names as the N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name
161 -- in Label2. Any other combination returns False. This routine is used
162 -- to compare the End_Labl scanned from the End line with the saved label
163 -- value in the scope stack.
169 function Check_End
return Boolean is
170 Name_On_Separate_Line
: Boolean;
171 -- Set True if the name on an END line is on a separate source line
172 -- from the END. This is highly suspicious, but is allowed. The point
173 -- is that we want to make sure that we don't just have a missing
174 -- semicolon misleading us into swallowing an identifier from the
177 Name_Scan_State
: Saved_Scan_State
;
178 -- Save state at start of name if Name_On_Separate_Line is TRUE
180 Span_Node
: constant Node_Id
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Node
;
183 End_Labl_Present
:= False;
186 -- Our first task is to scan out the END sequence if one is present.
187 -- If none is present, signal by setting End_Type to E_Dummy.
189 if Token
/= Tok_End
then
193 Save_Scan_State
(Scan_State
); -- at END
194 End_Sloc
:= Token_Ptr
;
195 End_Column
:= Start_Column
;
199 -- Set End_Span if expected. note that this will be useless
200 -- if we do not have the right ending keyword, but in this
201 -- case we have a malformed program anyway, and the setting
202 -- of End_Span will simply be unreliable in this case anyway.
204 if Present
(Span_Node
) then
205 Set_End_Location
(Span_Node
, Token_Ptr
);
208 -- Cases of keywords where no label is allowed
210 if Token
= Tok_Case
then
214 elsif Token
= Tok_If
then
218 elsif Token
= Tok_Record
then
219 End_Type
:= E_Record
;
222 elsif Token
= Tok_Return
then
223 End_Type
:= E_Return
;
226 elsif Token
= Tok_Select
then
227 End_Type
:= E_Select
;
230 -- Cases which do allow labels
235 if Token
= Tok_Loop
then
239 -- FOR or WHILE allowed (signalling error) to substitute for LOOP
240 -- if on the same line as the END
242 elsif (Token
= Tok_For
or else Token
= Tok_While
)
243 and then not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
245 Scan
; -- past FOR or WHILE
249 -- Cases with no keyword
255 -- Now see if a name is present
257 if Token
= Tok_Identifier
or else
258 Token
= Tok_String_Literal
or else
259 Token
= Tok_Operator_Symbol
261 if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
then
262 Name_On_Separate_Line
:= True;
263 Save_Scan_State
(Name_Scan_State
);
265 Name_On_Separate_Line
:= False;
268 End_Labl
:= P_Designator
;
269 End_Labl_Present
:= True;
271 -- We have now scanned out a name. Here is where we do a check
272 -- to catch the cases like:
277 -- where the missing semicolon might make us swallow up the X
278 -- as a bogus end label. In a situation like this, where the
279 -- apparent name is on a separate line, we accept it only if
280 -- it matches the label and is followed by a semicolon.
282 if Name_On_Separate_Line
then
283 if Token
/= Tok_Semicolon
or else
284 not Same_Label
(End_Labl
, Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Labl
)
286 Restore_Scan_State
(Name_Scan_State
);
288 End_Labl_Present
:= False;
292 -- Here for case of name allowed, but no name present. We will
293 -- supply an implicit matching name, with source location set
294 -- to the scan location past the END token.
297 End_Labl
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Labl
;
299 if End_Labl
> Empty_Or_Error
then
301 -- The task here is to construct a designator from the
302 -- opening label, with the components all marked as not
303 -- from source, and Is_End_Label set in the identifier
304 -- or operator symbol. The location for all components
305 -- is the current token location.
307 -- Case of child unit name
309 if Nkind
(End_Labl
) = N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name
then
311 Eref
: constant Node_Id
:=
312 Make_Identifier
(Token_Ptr
,
314 Chars
(Defining_Identifier
(End_Labl
)));
316 function Copy_Name
(N
: Node_Id
) return Node_Id
;
317 -- Copies a selected component or identifier
323 function Copy_Name
(N
: Node_Id
) return Node_Id
is
327 if Nkind
(N
) = N_Selected_Component
then
329 Make_Selected_Component
(Token_Ptr
,
331 Copy_Name
(Prefix
(N
)),
333 Copy_Name
(Selector_Name
(N
)));
337 Make_Identifier
(Token_Ptr
,
339 Set_Comes_From_Source
(N
, False);
344 -- Start of processing for Child_End
347 Set_Comes_From_Source
(Eref
, False);
350 Make_Designator
(Token_Ptr
,
351 Name
=> Copy_Name
(Name
(End_Labl
)),
355 -- Simple identifier case
357 elsif Nkind
(End_Labl
) = N_Defining_Identifier
358 or else Nkind
(End_Labl
) = N_Identifier
361 Make_Identifier
(Token_Ptr
,
362 Chars
=> Chars
(End_Labl
));
364 elsif Nkind
(End_Labl
) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
365 or else Nkind
(End_Labl
) = N_Operator_Symbol
367 Get_Decoded_Name_String
(Chars
(End_Labl
));
370 Make_Operator_Symbol
(Token_Ptr
,
371 Chars
=> Chars
(End_Labl
),
372 Strval
=> String_From_Name_Buffer
);
375 Set_Comes_From_Source
(End_Labl
, False);
376 End_Labl_Present
:= False;
378 -- Do style check for missing label
381 and then End_Type
= E_Name
382 and then Explicit_Start_Label
(Scope
.Last
)
384 Style
.No_End_Name
(Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Labl
);
390 -- Except in case of END RECORD, semicolon must follow. For END
391 -- RECORD, a semicolon does follow, but it is part of a higher level
392 -- construct. In any case, a missing semicolon is not serious enough
393 -- to consider the END statement to be bad in the sense that we
394 -- are dealing with (i.e. to be suspicious that it is not in fact
395 -- the END statement we are looking for!)
397 if End_Type
/= E_Record
then
398 if Token
= Tok_Semicolon
then
401 -- Semicolon is missing. If the missing semicolon is at the end
402 -- of the line, i.e. we are at the start of the line now, then
403 -- a missing semicolon gets flagged, but is not serious enough
404 -- to consider the END statement to be bad in the sense that we
405 -- are dealing with (i.e. to be suspicious that this END is not
406 -- the END statement we are looking for).
408 -- Similarly, if we are at a colon, we flag it but a colon for
409 -- a semicolon is not serious enough to consider the END to be
410 -- incorrect. Same thing for a period in place of a semicolon.
412 elsif Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
413 or else Token
= Tok_Colon
414 or else Token
= Tok_Dot
418 -- If the missing semicolon is not at the start of the line,
419 -- then we do consider the END line to be dubious in this sense.
427 -- Now we call the Pop_End_Context routine to get a recommendation
428 -- as to what should be done with the END sequence we have scanned.
432 -- Remaining action depends on End_Action set by Pop_End_Context
436 -- Accept_As_Scanned. In this case, Pop_End_Context left Token
437 -- pointing past the last token of a syntactically correct END
439 when Accept_As_Scanned
=>
441 -- Syntactically correct included the possibility of a missing
442 -- semicolon. If we do have a missing semicolon, then we have
443 -- already given a message, but now we scan out possible rubbish
444 -- on the same line as the END
446 while not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
447 and then Prev_Token
/= Tok_Record
448 and then Prev_Token
/= Tok_Semicolon
449 and then Token
/= Tok_End
450 and then Token
/= Tok_EOF
457 -- Insert_And_Accept. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
458 -- to point to the start of the END sequence, and recommends that it
459 -- be left in place to satisfy an outer scope level END. This means
460 -- that we proceed as though an END were present, and leave the scan
461 -- pointer unchanged.
463 when Insert_And_Accept
=>
466 -- Skip_And_Accept. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
467 -- to point to the start of the END sequence. This END sequence is
468 -- syntactically incorrect, and an appropriate error message has
469 -- already been posted. Pop_End_Context recommends accepting the
470 -- END sequence as the one we want, so we skip past it and then
471 -- proceed as though an END were present.
473 when Skip_And_Accept
=>
477 -- Skip_And_Reject. In this case, Pop_End_Context has reset Token
478 -- to point to the start of the END sequence. This END sequence is
479 -- syntactically incorrect, and an appropriate error message has
480 -- already been posted. Pop_End_Context recommends entirely ignoring
481 -- this END sequence, so we skip past it and then return False, since
482 -- as far as the caller is concerned, no END sequence is present.
484 when Skip_And_Reject
=>
494 -- This procedure skips past an END sequence. On entry Token contains
495 -- Tok_End, and we know that the END sequence is syntactically incorrect,
496 -- and that an appropriate error message has already been posted. The
497 -- mission is simply to position the scan pointer to be the best guess of
498 -- the position after the END sequence. We do not issue any additional
499 -- error messages while carrying this out.
501 -- Error recovery: does not raise Error_Resync
503 procedure End_Skip
is
507 -- If the scan past the END leaves us on the next line, that's probably
508 -- where we should quit the scan, since it is likely that what we have
509 -- is a missing semicolon. Consider the following:
514 -- This will have looked like a syntactically valid END sequence to the
515 -- initial scan of the END, but subsequent checking will have determined
516 -- that the label Process_Input is not an appropriate label. The real
517 -- error is a missing semicolon after the END, and by leaving the scan
518 -- pointer just past the END, we will improve the error recovery.
520 if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
then
524 -- If there is a semicolon after the END, scan it out and we are done
526 if Token
= Tok_Semicolon
then
531 -- Otherwise skip past a token after the END on the same line. Note
532 -- that we do not eat a token on the following line since it seems
533 -- very unlikely in any case that the END gets separated from its
534 -- token, and we do not want to swallow up a keyword that starts a
535 -- legitimate construct following the bad END.
537 if not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
540 -- Cases of normal tokens following an END
542 (Token
= Tok_Case
or else
543 Token
= Tok_For
or else
544 Token
= Tok_If
or else
545 Token
= Tok_Loop
or else
546 Token
= Tok_Record
or else
547 Token
= Tok_Select
or else
549 -- Cases of bogus keywords ending loops
551 Token
= Tok_For
or else
552 Token
= Tok_While
or else
554 -- Cases of operator symbol names without quotes
556 Token
= Tok_Abs
or else
557 Token
= Tok_And
or else
558 Token
= Tok_Mod
or else
559 Token
= Tok_Not
or else
560 Token
= Tok_Or
or else
564 Scan
; -- past token after END
566 -- If that leaves us on the next line, then we are done. This is the
567 -- same principle described above for the case of END at line end
569 if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
then
572 -- If we just scanned out record, then we are done, since the
573 -- semicolon after END RECORD is not part of the END sequence
575 elsif Prev_Token
= Tok_Record
then
578 -- If we have a semicolon, scan it out and we are done
580 elsif Token
= Tok_Semicolon
then
586 -- Check for a label present on the same line
589 if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
then
593 if Token
/= Tok_Identifier
594 and then Token
/= Tok_Operator_Symbol
595 and then Token
/= Tok_String_Literal
600 Scan
; -- past identifier, operator symbol or string literal
602 if Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
then
604 elsif Token
= Tok_Dot
then
609 -- Skip final semicolon
611 if Token
= Tok_Semicolon
then
614 -- If we don't have a final semicolon, skip until we either encounter
615 -- an END token, or a semicolon or the start of the next line. This
616 -- allows general junk to follow the end line (normally it is hard to
617 -- think that anyone will put anything deliberate here, and remember
618 -- that we know there is a missing semicolon in any case). We also
619 -- quite on an EOF (or else we would get stuck in an infinite loop
620 -- if there is no line end at the end of the last line of the file)
623 while Token
/= Tok_End
624 and then Token
/= Tok_EOF
625 and then Token
/= Tok_Semicolon
626 and then not Token_Is_At_Start_Of_Line
628 Scan
; -- past junk token on same line
639 -- This procedure is called when END is required or expected to terminate
640 -- a sequence of statements. The caller has already made an appropriate
641 -- entry on the scope stack to describe the expected form of the END.
642 -- End_Statements should only be used in cases where the only appropriate
643 -- terminator is END.
645 -- Error recovery: cannot raise Error_Resync;
647 procedure End_Statements
(Parent
: Node_Id
:= Empty
) is
649 -- This loop runs more than once in the case where Check_End rejects
650 -- the END sequence, as indicated by Check_End returning False.
654 if Present
(Parent
) then
655 Set_End_Label
(Parent
, End_Labl
);
661 -- Extra statements past the bogus END are discarded. This is not
662 -- ideal for maximum error recovery, but it's too much trouble to
663 -- find an appropriate place to put them!
665 Discard_Junk_List
(P_Sequence_Of_Statements
(SS_None
));
669 ------------------------
670 -- Evaluate End Entry --
671 ------------------------
673 procedure Evaluate_End_Entry
(SS_Index
: Nat
) is
675 Column_OK
:= (End_Column
= Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Ecol
);
677 Token_OK
:= (End_Type
= Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Etyp
or else
678 (End_Type
= E_Name
and then
679 Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Etyp
>= E_Name
));
681 Label_OK
:= End_Labl_Present
683 (Same_Label
(End_Labl
, Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Labl
)
684 or else Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Labl
= Error
);
686 -- Compute setting of Syntax_OK. We definitely have a syntax error
687 -- if the Token does not match properly or if P_End_Scan detected
688 -- a syntax error such as a missing semicolon.
690 if not Token_OK
or not End_OK
then
693 -- Final check is that label is OK. Certainly it is OK if there
694 -- was an exact match on the label (the END label = the stack label)
699 -- Case of label present
701 elsif End_Labl_Present
then
703 -- If probably misspelling, then complain, and pretend it is OK
706 Nam
: constant Node_Or_Entity_Id
:= Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Labl
;
709 if Nkind
(End_Labl
) in N_Has_Chars
710 and then Comes_From_Source
(Nam
)
711 and then Nkind
(Nam
) in N_Has_Chars
712 and then Chars
(End_Labl
) > Error_Name
713 and then Chars
(Nam
) > Error_Name
715 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Chars
(Nam
);
717 if Error_Msg_Name_1
> Error_Name
then
718 if Is_Bad_Spelling_Of
(Chars
(Nam
), Chars
(End_Labl
)) then
719 Error_Msg_Name_1
:= Chars
(Nam
);
720 Error_Msg_N
-- CODEFIX
721 ("misspelling of %", End_Labl
);
731 -- Otherwise we have cases of no label on the END line. For the loop
732 -- case, this is acceptable only if the loop is unlabeled.
734 elsif End_Type
= E_Loop
then
735 Syntax_OK
:= not Explicit_Start_Label
(SS_Index
);
737 -- Cases where a label is definitely allowed on the END line
739 elsif End_Type
= E_Name
then
740 Syntax_OK
:= (not Explicit_Start_Label
(SS_Index
))
742 (not Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Lreq
);
744 -- Otherwise we have cases which don't allow labels anyway, so we
745 -- certainly accept an END which does not have a label.
750 end Evaluate_End_Entry
;
752 --------------------------
753 -- Explicit_Start_Label --
754 --------------------------
756 function Explicit_Start_Label
(SS_Index
: Nat
) return Boolean is
757 L
: constant Node_Id
:= Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Labl
;
758 Etyp
: constant SS_End_Type
:= Scope
.Table
(SS_Index
).Etyp
;
764 -- In the following test we protect the call to Comes_From_Source
765 -- against lines containing previously reported syntax errors.
768 or else Etyp
= E_Name
769 or else Etyp
= E_Suspicious_Is
770 or else Etyp
= E_Bad_Is
)
771 and then Comes_From_Source
(L
)
777 end Explicit_Start_Label
;
779 ------------------------
780 -- Output End Deleted --
781 ------------------------
783 procedure Output_End_Deleted
is
786 if End_Type
= E_Loop
then
787 Error_Msg_SC
("no LOOP for this `END LOOP`!");
789 elsif End_Type
= E_Case
then
790 Error_Msg_SC
("no CASE for this `END CASE`");
792 elsif End_Type
= E_If
then
793 Error_Msg_SC
("no IF for this `END IF`!");
795 elsif End_Type
= E_Record
then
796 Error_Msg_SC
("no RECORD for this `END RECORD`!");
798 elsif End_Type
= E_Return
then
799 Error_Msg_SC
("no RETURN for this `END RETURN`!");
801 elsif End_Type
= E_Select
then
802 Error_Msg_SC
("no SELECT for this `END SELECT`!");
805 Error_Msg_SC
("no BEGIN for this END!");
807 end Output_End_Deleted
;
809 -------------------------
810 -- Output End Expected --
811 -------------------------
813 procedure Output_End_Expected
(Ins
: Boolean) is
814 End_Type
: SS_End_Type
;
817 -- Suppress message if this was a potentially junk entry (e.g. a
818 -- record entry where no record keyword was present.
820 if Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Junk
then
824 End_Type
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
;
825 Error_Msg_Col
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Ecol
;
826 Error_Msg_Sloc
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Sloc
;
828 if Explicit_Start_Label
(Scope
.Last
) then
829 Error_Msg_Node_1
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Labl
;
831 Error_Msg_Node_1
:= Empty
;
834 -- Suppress message if error was posted on opening label
836 if Error_Msg_Node_1
> Empty_Or_Error
837 and then Error_Posted
(Error_Msg_Node_1
)
842 if End_Type
= E_Case
then
843 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
844 ("`END CASE;` expected@ for CASE#!");
846 elsif End_Type
= E_If
then
847 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
848 ("`END IF;` expected@ for IF#!");
850 elsif End_Type
= E_Loop
then
851 if Error_Msg_Node_1
= Empty
then
852 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
853 ("`END LOOP;` expected@ for LOOP#!");
855 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
856 ("`END LOOP &;` expected@!");
859 elsif End_Type
= E_Record
then
860 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
861 ("`END RECORD;` expected@ for RECORD#!");
863 elsif End_Type
= E_Return
then
864 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
865 ("`END RETURN;` expected@ for RETURN#!");
867 elsif End_Type
= E_Select
then
868 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
869 ("`END SELECT;` expected@ for SELECT#!");
871 -- All remaining cases are cases with a name (we do not treat
872 -- the suspicious is cases specially for a replaced end, only
873 -- for an inserted end).
875 elsif End_Type
= E_Name
or else (not Ins
) then
876 if Error_Msg_Node_1
= Empty
then
877 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
878 ("`END;` expected@ for BEGIN#!");
880 Error_Msg_SC
-- CODEFIX
881 ("`END &;` expected@!");
884 -- The other possibility is a missing END for a subprogram with a
885 -- suspicious IS (that probably should have been a semicolon). The
886 -- Missing IS confirms the suspicion!
888 else -- End_Type = E_Suspicious_Is or E_Bad_Is
889 Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
:= E_Bad_Is
;
891 end Output_End_Expected
;
893 ------------------------
894 -- Output End Missing --
895 ------------------------
897 procedure Output_End_Missing
is
898 End_Type
: SS_End_Type
;
901 -- Suppress message if this was a potentially junk entry (e.g. a
902 -- record entry where no record keyword was present.
904 if Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Junk
then
908 End_Type
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
;
909 Error_Msg_Sloc
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Sloc
;
911 if Explicit_Start_Label
(Scope
.Last
) then
912 Error_Msg_Node_1
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Labl
;
914 Error_Msg_Node_1
:= Empty
;
917 if End_Type
= E_Case
then
918 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END CASE;` for CASE#!");
920 elsif End_Type
= E_If
then
921 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END IF;` for IF#!");
923 elsif End_Type
= E_Loop
then
924 if Error_Msg_Node_1
= Empty
then
925 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END LOOP;` for LOOP#!");
927 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END LOOP &;`!");
930 elsif End_Type
= E_Record
then
932 ("missing `END RECORD;` for RECORD#!");
934 elsif End_Type
= E_Return
then
936 ("missing `END RETURN;` for RETURN#!");
938 elsif End_Type
= E_Select
then
940 ("missing `END SELECT;` for SELECT#!");
942 elsif End_Type
= E_Name
then
943 if Error_Msg_Node_1
= Empty
then
944 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END;` for BEGIN#!");
946 Error_Msg_BC
("missing `END &;`!");
949 else -- End_Type = E_Suspicious_Is or E_Bad_Is
950 Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
:= E_Bad_Is
;
952 end Output_End_Missing
;
954 ---------------------
955 -- Pop End Context --
956 ---------------------
958 procedure Pop_End_Context
is
960 Pretty_Good
: Boolean;
961 -- This flag is set True if the END sequence is syntactically incorrect,
962 -- but is (from a heuristic point of view), pretty likely to be simply
963 -- a misspelling of the intended END.
965 Outer_Match
: Boolean;
966 -- This flag is set True if we decide that the current END sequence
967 -- belongs to some outer level entry in the scope stack, and thus
968 -- we will NOT eat it up in matching the current expected END.
971 -- If not at END, then output END expected message
973 if End_Type
= E_Dummy
then
976 End_Action
:= Insert_And_Accept
;
979 -- Otherwise we do have an END present
982 -- A special check. If we have END; followed by an end of file,
983 -- WITH or SEPARATE, then if we are not at the outer level, then
984 -- we have a syntax error. Consider the example:
996 -- Now the END; here is a syntactically correct closer for the
997 -- declare block, but if we eat it up, then we obviously have
998 -- a missing END for the outer context (since WITH can only appear
999 -- at the outer level.
1001 -- In this situation, we always reserve the END; for the outer level,
1002 -- even if it is in the wrong column. This is because it's much more
1003 -- useful to have the error message point to the DECLARE than to the
1004 -- package header in this case.
1006 -- We also reserve an end with a name before the end of file if the
1007 -- name is the one we expect at the outer level.
1009 if (Token
= Tok_EOF
or else
1010 Token
= Tok_With
or else
1011 Token
= Tok_Separate
)
1012 and then End_Type
>= E_Name
1013 and then (not End_Labl_Present
1014 or else Same_Label
(End_Labl
, Scope
.Table
(1).Labl
))
1015 and then Scope
.Last
> 1
1017 Restore_Scan_State
(Scan_State
); -- to END
1018 Output_End_Expected
(Ins
=> True);
1020 End_Action
:= Insert_And_Accept
;
1024 -- Otherwise we go through the normal END evaluation procedure
1026 Evaluate_End_Entry
(Scope
.Last
);
1028 -- If top entry in stack is syntactically correct, then we have
1029 -- scanned it out and everything is fine. This is the required
1030 -- action to properly process correct Ada programs.
1034 -- Complain if checking columns and END is not in right column.
1035 -- Right in this context means exactly right, or on the same
1036 -- line as the opener.
1038 if RM_Column_Check
then
1039 if End_Column
/= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Ecol
1040 and then Current_Line_Start
> Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Sloc
1042 -- A special case, for END RECORD, we are also allowed to
1043 -- line up with the TYPE keyword opening the declaration.
1045 and then (Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
/= E_Record
1046 or else Get_Column_Number
(End_Sloc
) /=
1047 Get_Column_Number
(Type_Token_Location
))
1049 Error_Msg_Col
:= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Ecol
;
1051 ("(style) END in wrong column, should be@", End_Sloc
);
1055 -- One final check. If the end had a label, check for an exact
1056 -- duplicate of this end sequence, and if so, skip it with an
1057 -- appropriate message.
1059 if End_Labl_Present
and then Token
= Tok_End
then
1061 Scan_State
: Saved_Scan_State
;
1062 End_Loc
: constant Source_Ptr
:= Token_Ptr
;
1064 Dup_Found
: Boolean := False;
1067 Save_Scan_State
(Scan_State
);
1071 if Token
= Tok_Identifier
1072 or else Token
= Tok_Operator_Symbol
1074 Nxt_Labl
:= P_Designator
;
1076 -- We only consider it an error if the label is a match
1077 -- and would be wrong for the level one above us, and
1078 -- the indentation is the same.
1080 if Token
= Tok_Semicolon
1081 and then Same_Label
(End_Labl
, Nxt_Labl
)
1082 and then End_Column
= Start_Column
1086 (not Explicit_Start_Label
(Scope
.Last
- 1))
1090 Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
- 1).Labl
)))
1093 Error_Msg
("duplicate end line ignored", End_Loc
);
1098 if not Dup_Found
then
1099 Restore_Scan_State
(Scan_State
);
1104 -- All OK, so return to caller indicating END is OK
1107 End_Action
:= Accept_As_Scanned
;
1111 -- If that check failed, then we definitely have an error. The issue
1112 -- is how to choose among three possible courses of action:
1114 -- 1. Ignore the current END text completely, scanning past it,
1115 -- deciding that it belongs neither to the current context,
1116 -- nor to any outer context.
1118 -- 2. Accept the current END text, scanning past it, and issuing
1119 -- an error message that it does not have the right form.
1121 -- 3. Leave the current END text in place, NOT scanning past it,
1122 -- issuing an error message indicating the END expected for the
1123 -- current context. In this case, the END is available to match
1124 -- some outer END context.
1126 -- From a correct functioning point of view, it does not make any
1127 -- difference which of these three approaches we take, the program
1128 -- will work correctly in any case. However, making an accurate
1129 -- choice among these alternatives, i.e. choosing the one that
1130 -- corresponds to what the programmer had in mind, does make a
1131 -- significant difference in the quality of error recovery.
1133 Restore_Scan_State
(Scan_State
); -- to END
1135 -- First we see how good the current END entry is with respect to
1136 -- what we expect. It is considered pretty good if the token is OK,
1137 -- and either the label or the column matches. An END for RECORD is
1138 -- always considered to be pretty good in the record case. This is
1139 -- because not only does a record disallow a nested structure, but
1140 -- also it is unlikely that such nesting could occur by accident.
1142 Pretty_Good
:= (Token_OK
and (Column_OK
or Label_OK
))
1143 or else Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
= E_Record
;
1145 -- Next check, if there is a deeper entry in the stack which
1146 -- has a very high probability of being acceptable, then insert
1147 -- the END entry we want, leaving the higher level entry for later
1149 for J
in reverse 1 .. Scope
.Last
- 1 loop
1150 Evaluate_End_Entry
(J
);
1152 -- To even consider the deeper entry to be immediately acceptable,
1153 -- it must be syntactically correct. Furthermore it must either
1154 -- have a correct label, or the correct column. If the current
1155 -- entry was a close match (Pretty_Good set), then we are even
1156 -- more strict in accepting the outer level one: even if it has
1157 -- the right label, it must have the right column as well.
1161 Outer_Match
:= Label_OK
and Column_OK
;
1163 Outer_Match
:= Label_OK
or Column_OK
;
1166 Outer_Match
:= False;
1169 -- If the outer entry does convincingly match the END text, then
1170 -- back up the scan to the start of the END sequence, issue an
1171 -- error message indicating the END we expected, and return with
1172 -- Token pointing to the END (case 3 from above discussion).
1177 End_Action
:= Insert_And_Accept
;
1182 -- Here we have a situation in which the current END entry is
1183 -- syntactically incorrect, but there is no deeper entry in the
1184 -- END stack which convincingly matches it.
1186 -- If the END text was judged to be a Pretty_Good match for the
1187 -- expected token or if it appears left of the expected column,
1188 -- then we will accept it as the one we want, scanning past it, even
1189 -- though it is not completely right (we issue a message showing what
1190 -- we expected it to be). This is action 2 from the discussion above.
1191 -- There is one other special case to consider: the LOOP case.
1192 -- Consider the example:
1198 -- Here the column lines up with Lbl, so END LOOP is to the right,
1199 -- but it is still acceptable. LOOP is the one case where alignment
1200 -- practices vary substantially in practice.
1203 or else End_Column
<= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Ecol
1204 or else (End_Type
= Scope
.Table
(Scope
.Last
).Etyp
1205 and then End_Type
= E_Loop
)
1207 Output_End_Expected
(Ins
=> False);
1209 End_Action
:= Skip_And_Accept
;
1212 -- Here we have the case where the END is to the right of the
1213 -- expected column and does not have a correct label to convince
1214 -- us that it nevertheless belongs to the current scope. For this
1215 -- we consider that it probably belongs not to the current context,
1216 -- but to some inner context that was not properly recognized (due to
1217 -- other syntax errors), and for which no proper scope stack entry
1218 -- was made. The proper action in this case is to delete the END text
1219 -- and return False to the caller as a signal to keep on looking for
1220 -- an acceptable END. This is action 1 from the discussion above.
1224 End_Action
:= Skip_And_Reject
;
1228 end Pop_End_Context
;
1234 function Same_Label
(Label1
, Label2
: Node_Id
) return Boolean is
1236 if Nkind
(Label1
) in N_Has_Chars
1237 and then Nkind
(Label2
) in N_Has_Chars
1239 return Chars
(Label1
) = Chars
(Label2
);
1241 elsif Nkind
(Label1
) = N_Selected_Component
1242 and then Nkind
(Label2
) = N_Selected_Component
1244 return Same_Label
(Prefix
(Label1
), Prefix
(Label2
)) and then
1245 Same_Label
(Selector_Name
(Label1
), Selector_Name
(Label2
));
1247 elsif Nkind
(Label1
) = N_Designator
1248 and then Nkind
(Label2
) = N_Defining_Program_Unit_Name
1250 return Same_Label
(Name
(Label1
), Name
(Label2
)) and then
1251 Same_Label
(Identifier
(Label1
), Defining_Identifier
(Label2
));