2003-05-31 Bud Davis <bdavis9659@comcast.net>
[official-gcc.git] / gcc / ada / sem.ads
blob5d4ca4687e0f7baa09e09c976f4edaec6ee4eefc
1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 -- --
3 -- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
4 -- --
5 -- S E M --
6 -- --
7 -- S p e c --
8 -- --
9 -- Copyright (C) 1992-2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
10 -- --
11 -- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
12 -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
13 -- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- --
14 -- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
15 -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
16 -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
17 -- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
18 -- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write --
19 -- to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, --
20 -- MA 02111-1307, USA. --
21 -- --
22 -- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
23 -- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
24 -- --
25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 --------------------------------------
28 -- Semantic Analysis: General Model --
29 --------------------------------------
31 -- Semantic processing involves 3 phases which are highly interwined
32 -- (ie mutually recursive):
34 -- Analysis implements the bulk of semantic analysis such as
35 -- name analysis and type resolution for declarations,
36 -- instructions and expressions. The main routine
37 -- driving this process is procedure Analyze given below.
38 -- This analysis phase is really a bottom up pass that is
39 -- achieved during the recursive traversal performed by the
40 -- Analyze_... procedures implemented in the sem_* packages.
41 -- For expressions this phase determines unambiguous types
42 -- and collects sets of possible types where the
43 -- interpretation is potentially ambiguous.
45 -- Resolution is carried out only for expressions to finish type
46 -- resolution that was initiated but not necessarily
47 -- completed during analysis (because of overloading
48 -- ambiguities). Specifically, after completing the bottom
49 -- up pass carried out during analysis for expressions, the
50 -- Resolve routine (see the spec of sem_res for more info)
51 -- is called to perform a top down resolution with
52 -- recursive calls to itself to resolve operands.
54 -- Expansion if we are not generating code this phase is a no-op.
55 -- otherwise this phase expands, ie transforms, original
56 -- declaration, expressions or instructions into simpler
57 -- structures that can be handled by the back-end. This
58 -- phase is also in charge of generating code which is
59 -- implicit in the original source (for instance for
60 -- default initializations, controlled types, etc.)
61 -- There are two separate instances where expansion is
62 -- invoked. For declarations and instructions, expansion is
63 -- invoked just after analysis since no resolution needs
64 -- to be performed. For expressions, expansion is done just
65 -- after resolution. In both cases expansion is done from the
66 -- bottom up just before the end of Analyze for instructions
67 -- and declarations or the call to Resolve for expressions.
68 -- The main routine driving expansion is Expand.
69 -- See the spec of Expander for more details.
71 -- To summarize, in normal code generation mode we recursively traverse the
72 -- abstract syntax tree top-down performing semantic analysis bottom
73 -- up. For instructions and declarations, before the call to the Analyze
74 -- routine completes we perform expansion since at that point we have all
75 -- semantic information needed. For expression nodes, after the call to
76 -- Analysis terminates we invoke the Resolve routine to transmit top-down
77 -- the type that was gathered by Analyze which will resolve possible
78 -- ambiguities in the expression. Just before the call to Resolve
79 -- terminates, the expression can be expanded since all the semantic
80 -- information is available at that point.
82 -- If we are not generating code then the expansion phase is a no-op.
84 -- When generating code there are a number of exceptions to the basic
85 -- Analysis-Resolution-Expansion model for expressions. The most prominent
86 -- examples are the handling of default expressions and aggregates.
88 -------------------------------------
89 -- Handling of Default Expressions --
90 -------------------------------------
92 -- The default expressions in component declarations and in procedure
93 -- specifications (but not the ones in object declarations) are quite
94 -- tricky to handle. The problem is that some processing is required
95 -- at the point where the expression appears:
97 -- visibility analysis (including user defined operators)
98 -- freezing of static expressions
100 -- but other processing must be deferred until the enclosing entity
101 -- (record or procedure specification) is frozen:
103 -- freezing of any other types in the expression
104 -- expansion
106 -- Expansion has to be deferred since you can't generate code for
107 -- expressions that refernce types that have not been frozen yet. As an
108 -- example, consider the following:
110 -- type x is delta 0.5 range -10.0 .. +10.0;
111 -- ...
112 -- type q is record
113 -- xx : x := y * z;
114 -- end record;
116 -- for x'small use 0.25
118 -- The expander is in charge of dealing with fixed-point, and of course
119 -- the small declaration, which is not too late, since the declaration of
120 -- type q does *not* freeze type x, definitely affects the expanded code.
122 -- Generally our model is to combine analysis resolution and expansion, but
123 -- this is the one case where this model falls down. Here is how we patch
124 -- it up without causing too much distortion to our basic model.
126 -- A switch (sede below) is set to indicate that we are in the initial
127 -- occurrence of a default expression. The analyzer is then called on this
128 -- expression with the switch set true. Analysis and resolution proceed
129 -- almost as usual, except that Freeze_Expression will not freeze
130 -- non-static expressions if this switch is set, and the call to Expand at
131 -- the end of resolution is skipped. This also skips the code that normally
132 -- sets the Analyzed flag to True). The result is that when we are done the
133 -- tree is still marked as unanalyzed, but all types for static expressions
134 -- are frozen as required, and all entities of variables have been
135 -- recorded. We then turn off the switch, and later on reanalyze the
136 -- expression with the switch off. The effect is that this second analysis
137 -- freezes the rest of the types as required, and generates code but
138 -- visibility analysis is not repeated since all the entities are marked.
140 -- The second analysis (the one that generates code) is in the context
141 -- where the code is required. For a record field default, this is in
142 -- the initialization procedure for the record and for a subprogram
143 -- default parameter, it is at the point the subprogram is frozen.
145 ------------------
146 -- Pre-Analysis --
147 ------------------
149 -- For certain kind of expressions, such as aggregates, we need to defer
150 -- expansion of the aggregate and its inner expressions after the whole
151 -- set of expressions appearing inside the aggregate have been analyzed.
152 -- Consider, for instance the following example:
154 -- (1 .. 100 => new Thing (Function_Call))
156 -- The normal Analysis-Resolution-Expansion mechanism where expansion
157 -- of the children is performed before expansion of the parent does not
158 -- work if the code generated for the children by the expander needs
159 -- to be evaluated repeatdly (for instance in the above aggregate
160 -- "new Thing (Function_Call)" needs to be called 100 times.)
161 -- The reason why this mecanism does not work is that, the expanded code
162 -- for the children is typically inserted above the parent and thus
163 -- when the father gets expanded no re-evaluation takes place. For instance
164 -- in the case of aggregates if "new Thing (Function_Call)" is expanded
165 -- before of the aggregate the expanded code will be placed outside
166 -- of the aggregate and when expanding the aggregate the loop from 1 to 100
167 -- will not surround the expanded code for "new Thing (Function_Call)".
169 -- To remedy this situation we introduce a new flag which signals whether
170 -- we want a full analysis (ie expansion is enabled) or a pre-analysis
171 -- which performs Analysis and Resolution but no expansion.
173 -- After the complete pre-analysis of an expression has been carried out
174 -- we can transform the expression and then carry out the full
175 -- Analyze-Resolve-Expand cycle on the transformed expression top-down
176 -- so that the expansion of inner expressions happens inside the newly
177 -- generated node for the parent expression.
179 -- Note that the difference between processing of default expressions and
180 -- pre-analysis of other expressions is that we do carry out freezing in
181 -- the latter but not in the former (except for static scalar expressions).
182 -- The routine that performs pre-analysis is called Pre_Analyze_And_Resolve
183 -- and is in Sem_Res.
185 with Alloc;
186 with Einfo; use Einfo;
187 with Opt; use Opt;
188 with Snames; use Snames;
189 with Table;
190 with Types; use Types;
192 package Sem is
194 New_Nodes_OK : Int := 1;
195 -- Temporary flag for use in checking out HLO. Set non-zero if it is
196 -- OK to generate new nodes.
198 -----------------------------
199 -- Semantic Analysis Flags --
200 -----------------------------
202 Full_Analysis : Boolean := True;
203 -- Switch to indicate whether we are doing a full analysis or a
204 -- pre-analysis. In normal analysis mode (Analysis-Expansion for
205 -- instructions or declarations) or (Analysis-Resolution-Expansion for
206 -- expressions) this flag is set. Note that if we are not generating
207 -- code the expansion phase merely sets the Analyzed flag to True in
208 -- this case. If we are in Pre-Analysis mode (see above) this flag is
209 -- set to False then the expansion phase is skipped.
210 -- When this flag is False the flag Expander_Active is also False
211 -- (the Expander_Activer flag defined in the spec of package Expander
212 -- tells you whether expansion is currently enabled).
213 -- You should really regard this as a read only flag.
215 In_Default_Expression : Boolean := False;
216 -- Switch to indicate that we are in a default expression, as described
217 -- above. Note that this must be recursively saved on a Semantics call
218 -- since it is possible for the analysis of an expression to result in
219 -- a recursive call (e.g. to get the entity for System.Address as part
220 -- of the processing of an Address attribute reference).
221 -- When this switch is True then Full_Analysis above must be False.
222 -- You should really regard this as a read only flag.
224 In_Inlined_Body : Boolean := False;
225 -- Switch to indicate that we are analyzing and resolving an inlined
226 -- body. Type checking is disabled in this context, because types are
227 -- known to be compatible. This avoids problems with private types whose
228 -- full view is derived from private types.
230 Inside_A_Generic : Boolean := False;
231 -- This flag is set if we are processing a generic specification,
232 -- generic definition, or generic body. When this flag is True the
233 -- Expander_Active flag is False to disable any code expansion (see
234 -- package Expander). Only the generic processing can modify the
235 -- status of this flag, any other client should regard it as read-only.
237 Unloaded_Subunits : Boolean := False;
238 -- This flag is set True if we have subunits that are not loaded. This
239 -- occurs when the main unit is a subunit, and contains lower level
240 -- subunits that are not loaded. We use this flag to suppress warnings
241 -- about unused variables, since these warnings are unreliable in this
242 -- case. We could perhaps do a more accurate job and retain some of the
243 -- warnings, but it is quite a tricky job. See test 4323-002.
245 -----------------
246 -- Scope Stack --
247 -----------------
249 Scope_Suppress : Suppress_Record := Suppress_Options;
250 -- This record contains the current scope based settings of the suppress
251 -- switches. It is initialized from the options as shown, and then modified
252 -- by pragma Suppress. On entry to each scope, the current setting is saved
253 -- the scope stack, and then restored on exit from the scope.
255 -- The scope stack holds all entries of the scope table. As in the parser,
256 -- we use Last as the stack pointer, so that we can always find the scope
257 -- that is currently open in Scope_Stack.Table (Scope_Stack.Last). The
258 -- oldest entry, at Scope_Stack (0) is Standard. The entries in the table
259 -- include the entity for the referenced scope, together with information
260 -- used to restore the proper setting of check suppressions on scope exit.
262 -- There are two kinds of suppress checks, scope based suppress checks
263 -- (from initial command line arguments, or from Suppress pragmas not
264 -- including an entity name). The scope based suppress checks are recorded
265 -- in the Sem.Supress variable, and all that is necessary is to save the
266 -- state of this variable on scope entry, and restore it on scope exit.
268 -- The other kind of suppress check is entity based suppress checks, from
269 -- Suppress pragmas giving an Entity_Id. These checks are reflected by the
270 -- appropriate bit being set in the corresponding entity, and restoring the
271 -- setting of these bits is a little trickier. In particular a given pragma
272 -- Suppress may or may not affect the current state. If it sets a check for
273 -- an entity that is already checked, then it is important that this check
274 -- not be restored on scope exit. The situation is made more complicated
275 -- by the fact that a given suppress pragma can specify multiple entities
276 -- (in the overloaded case), and multiple checks (by using All_Checks), so
277 -- that it may be partially effective. On exit only checks that were in
278 -- fact effective must be removed. Logically we could do this by saving
279 -- the entire state of the entity flags on scope entry and restoring them
280 -- on scope exit, but that would be ludicrous, so what we do instead is to
281 -- maintain the following differential structure that shows what checks
282 -- were installed for the current scope.
284 -- Note: Suppress pragmas that specify entities defined in a package
285 -- spec do not make entries in this table, since such checks suppress
286 -- requests are valid for the entire life of the entity.
288 type Entity_Check_Suppress_Record is record
289 Entity : Entity_Id;
290 -- Entity to which the check applies
292 Check : Check_Id;
293 -- Check which is set (note this cannot be All_Checks, if the All_Checks
294 -- case, a sequence of eentries appears for the individual checks.
295 end record;
297 -- Entity_Suppress is a stack, to which new entries are added as they
298 -- are processed (see pragma Suppress circuit in Sem_Prag). The scope
299 -- stack entry simply saves the stack pointer on entry, and restores
300 -- it on exit by reversing the checks one by one.
302 package Entity_Suppress is new Table.Table (
303 Table_Component_Type => Entity_Check_Suppress_Record,
304 Table_Index_Type => Int,
305 Table_Low_Bound => 0,
306 Table_Initial => Alloc.Entity_Suppress_Initial,
307 Table_Increment => Alloc.Entity_Suppress_Increment,
308 Table_Name => "Entity_Suppress");
310 -- Here is the scope stack itself
312 type Scope_Stack_Entry is record
313 Entity : Entity_Id;
314 -- Entity representing the scope
316 Last_Subprogram_Name : String_Ptr;
317 -- Pointer to name of last subprogram body in this scope. Used for
318 -- testing proper alpha ordering of subprogram bodies in scope.
320 Save_Scope_Suppress : Suppress_Record;
321 -- Save contents of Scope_Suppress on entry
323 Save_Entity_Suppress : Int;
324 -- Save contents of Entity_Suppress.Last on entry
326 Is_Transient : Boolean;
327 -- Marks Transient Scopes (See Exp_Ch7 body for details)
329 Previous_Visibility : Boolean;
330 -- Used when installing the parent (s) of the current compilation
331 -- unit. The parent may already be visible because of an ongoing
332 -- compilation, and the proper visibility must be restored on exit.
334 Node_To_Be_Wrapped : Node_Id;
335 -- Only used in transient scopes. Records the node which will
336 -- be wrapped by the transient block.
338 Actions_To_Be_Wrapped_Before : List_Id;
339 Actions_To_Be_Wrapped_After : List_Id;
340 -- Actions that have to be inserted at the start or at the end of a
341 -- transient block. Used to temporarily hold these actions until the
342 -- block is created, at which time the actions are moved to the
343 -- block.
345 Pending_Freeze_Actions : List_Id;
346 -- Used to collect freeze entity nodes and associated actions that
347 -- are generated in a inner context but need to be analyzed outside,
348 -- such as records and initialization procedures. On exit from the
349 -- scope, this list of actions is inserted before the scope construct
350 -- and analyzed to generate the corresponding freeze processing and
351 -- elaboration of other associated actions.
353 First_Use_Clause : Node_Id;
354 -- Head of list of Use_Clauses in current scope. The list is built
355 -- when the declarations in the scope are processed. The list is
356 -- traversed on scope exit to undo the effect of the use clauses.
358 Component_Alignment_Default : Component_Alignment_Kind;
359 -- Component alignment to be applied to any record or array types
360 -- that are declared for which a specific component alignment pragma
361 -- does not set the alignment.
363 Is_Active_Stack_Base : Boolean;
364 -- Set to true only when entering the scope for Standard_Standard from
365 -- from within procedure Semantics. Indicates the base of the current
366 -- active set of scopes. Needed by In_Open_Scopes to handle cases
367 -- where Standard_Standard can be pushed in the middle of the active
368 -- set of scopes (occurs for instantiations of generic child units).
369 end record;
371 package Scope_Stack is new Table.Table (
372 Table_Component_Type => Scope_Stack_Entry,
373 Table_Index_Type => Int,
374 Table_Low_Bound => 0,
375 Table_Initial => Alloc.Scope_Stack_Initial,
376 Table_Increment => Alloc.Scope_Stack_Increment,
377 Table_Name => "Sem.Scope_Stack");
379 function Get_Scope_Suppress (C : Check_Id) return Boolean;
380 -- Get suppress status of check C for the current scope
382 procedure Set_Scope_Suppress (C : Check_Id; B : Boolean);
383 -- Set suppress status of check C for the current scope
385 -----------------
386 -- Subprograms --
387 -----------------
389 procedure Initialize;
390 -- Initialize internal tables
392 procedure Lock;
393 -- Lock internal tables before calling back end
395 procedure Semantics (Comp_Unit : Node_Id);
396 -- This procedure is called to perform semantic analysis on the specified
397 -- node which is the N_Compilation_Unit node for the unit.
399 procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id);
400 procedure Analyze (N : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
401 -- This is the recursive procedure which is applied to individual nodes
402 -- of the tree, starting at the top level node (compilation unit node)
403 -- and then moving down the tree in a top down traversal. It calls
404 -- individual routines with names Analyze_xxx to analyze node xxx. Each
405 -- of these routines is responsible for calling Analyze on the components
406 -- of the subtree.
408 -- Note: In the case of expression components (nodes whose Nkind is in
409 -- N_Subexpr), the call to Analyze does not complete the semantic analysis
410 -- of the node, since the type resolution cannot be completed until the
411 -- complete context is analyzed. The completion of the type analysis occurs
412 -- in the corresponding Resolve routine (see Sem_Res).
414 -- Note: for integer and real literals, the analyzer sets the flag to
415 -- indicate that the result is a static expression. If the expander
416 -- generates a literal that does NOT correspond to a static expression,
417 -- e.g. by folding an expression whose value is known at compile-time,
418 -- but is not technically static, then the caller should reset the
419 -- Is_Static_Expression flag after analyzing but before resolving.
421 -- If the Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done
422 -- with the specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress
423 -- all checks).
425 procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id);
426 procedure Analyze_List (L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
427 -- Analyzes each element of a list. If the Suppress argument is present,
428 -- then the analysis is done with the specified check suppressed (can
429 -- be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
431 procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze
432 (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id);
433 procedure Insert_List_After_And_Analyze
434 (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
435 -- Inserts list L after node N using Nlists.Insert_List_After, and then,
436 -- after this insertion is complete, analyzes all the nodes in the list,
437 -- including any additional nodes generated by this analysis. If the list
438 -- is empty or be No_List, the call has no effect. If the Suppress
439 -- argument is present, then the analysis is done with the specified
440 -- check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
442 procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze
443 (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id);
444 procedure Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze
445 (N : Node_Id; L : List_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
446 -- Inserts list L before node N using Nlists.Insert_List_Before, and then,
447 -- after this insertion is complete, analyzes all the nodes in the list,
448 -- including any additional nodes generated by this analysis. If the list
449 -- is empty or be No_List, the call has no effect. If the Suppress
450 -- argument is present, then the analysis is done with the specified
451 -- check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
453 procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze
454 (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id);
455 procedure Insert_After_And_Analyze
456 (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
457 -- Inserts node M after node N and then after the insertion is complete,
458 -- analyzes the inserted node and all nodes that are generated by
459 -- this analysis. If the node is empty, the call has no effect. If the
460 -- Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done with the
461 -- specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
463 procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze
464 (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id);
465 procedure Insert_Before_And_Analyze
466 (N : Node_Id; M : Node_Id; Suppress : Check_Id);
467 -- Inserts node M before node N and then after the insertion is complete,
468 -- analyzes the inserted node and all nodes that could be generated by
469 -- this analysis. If the node is empty, the call has no effect. If the
470 -- Suppress argument is present, then the analysis is done with the
471 -- specified check suppressed (can be All_Checks to suppress all checks).
473 function External_Ref_In_Generic (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
474 -- Return True if we are in the context of a generic and E is
475 -- external (more global) to it.
477 procedure Enter_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id);
478 -- Shall be called each time a Generic subprogram or package scope is
479 -- entered. S is the entity of the scope.
480 -- ??? At the moment, only called for package specs because this mechanism
481 -- is only used for avoiding freezing of external references in generics
482 -- and this can only be an issue if the outer generic scope is a package
483 -- spec (otherwise all external entities are already frozen)
485 procedure Exit_Generic_Scope (S : Entity_Id);
486 -- Shall be called each time a Generic subprogram or package scope is
487 -- exited. S is the entity of the scope.
488 -- ??? At the moment, only called for package specs exit.
490 end Sem;