1 Copyright (c) 1988, 1989 Hans-J. Boehm, Alan J. Demers
2 Copyright (c) 1991-1996 by Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved.
3 Copyright (c) 1996-1999 by Silicon Graphics. All rights reserved.
4 Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Hewlett-Packard Company. All rights reserved.
6 The file linux_threads.c is also
7 Copyright (c) 1998 by Fergus Henderson. All rights reserved.
9 The files Makefile.am, and configure.in are
10 Copyright (c) 2001 by Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved.
12 Several files supporting GNU-style builds are copyrighted by the Free
13 Software Foundation, and carry a different license from that given
16 THIS MATERIAL IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED
17 OR IMPLIED. ANY USE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK.
19 Permission is hereby granted to use or copy this program
20 for any purpose, provided the above notices are retained on all copies.
21 Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted,
22 provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was
23 modified is included with the above copyright notice.
25 A few of the files needed to use the GNU-style build procedure come with
26 slightly different licenses, though they are all similar in spirit. A few
27 are GPL'ed, but with an exception that should cover all uses in the
28 collector. (If you are concerned about such things, I recommend you look
29 at the notice in config.guess or ltmain.sh.)
31 This is version 6.3alpha1 of a conservative garbage collector for C and C++.
33 You might find a more recent version of this at
35 http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc
39 This is intended to be a general purpose, garbage collecting storage
40 allocator. The algorithms used are described in:
42 Boehm, H., and M. Weiser, "Garbage Collection in an Uncooperative Environment",
43 Software Practice & Experience, September 1988, pp. 807-820.
45 Boehm, H., A. Demers, and S. Shenker, "Mostly Parallel Garbage Collection",
46 Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '91 Conference on Programming Language Design
47 and Implementation, SIGPLAN Notices 26, 6 (June 1991), pp. 157-164.
49 Boehm, H., "Space Efficient Conservative Garbage Collection", Proceedings
50 of the ACM SIGPLAN '91 Conference on Programming Language Design and
51 Implementation, SIGPLAN Notices 28, 6 (June 1993), pp. 197-206.
53 Boehm H., "Reducing Garbage Collector Cache Misses", Proceedings of the
54 2000 International Symposium on Memory Management.
56 Possible interactions between the collector and optimizing compilers are
59 Boehm, H., and D. Chase, "A Proposal for GC-safe C Compilation",
60 The Journal of C Language Translation 4, 2 (December 1992).
64 Boehm H., "Simple GC-safe Compilation", Proceedings
65 of the ACM SIGPLAN '96 Conference on Programming Language Design and
68 (Some of these are also available from
69 http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/papers/, among other places.)
71 Unlike the collector described in the second reference, this collector
72 operates either with the mutator stopped during the entire collection
73 (default) or incrementally during allocations. (The latter is supported
74 on only a few machines.) On the most common platforms, it can be built
75 with or without thread support. On a few platforms, it can take advantage
76 of a multiprocessor to speed up garbage collection.
78 Many of the ideas underlying the collector have previously been explored
79 by others. Notably, some of the run-time systems developed at Xerox PARC
80 in the early 1980s conservatively scanned thread stacks to locate possible
81 pointers (cf. Paul Rovner, "On Adding Garbage Collection and Runtime Types
82 to a Strongly-Typed Statically Checked, Concurrent Language" Xerox PARC
83 CSL 84-7). Doug McIlroy wrote a simpler fully conservative collector that
84 was part of version 8 UNIX (tm), but appears to not have received
87 Rudimentary tools for use of the collector as a leak detector are included
88 (see http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/leak.html),
89 as is a fairly sophisticated string package "cord" that makes use of the
90 collector. (See doc/README.cords and H.-J. Boehm, R. Atkinson, and M. Plass,
91 "Ropes: An Alternative to Strings", Software Practice and Experience 25, 12
92 (December 1995), pp. 1315-1330. This is very similar to the "rope" package
93 in Xerox Cedar, or the "rope" package in the SGI STL or the g++ distribution.)
95 Further collector documantation can be found at
97 http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc
102 This is a garbage collecting storage allocator that is intended to be
103 used as a plug-in replacement for C's malloc.
105 Since the collector does not require pointers to be tagged, it does not
106 attempt to ensure that all inaccessible storage is reclaimed. However,
107 in our experience, it is typically more successful at reclaiming unused
108 memory than most C programs using explicit deallocation. Unlike manually
109 introduced leaks, the amount of unreclaimed memory typically stays
112 In the following, an "object" is defined to be a region of memory allocated
113 by the routines described below.
115 Any objects not intended to be collected must be pointed to either
116 from other such accessible objects, or from the registers,
117 stack, data, or statically allocated bss segments. Pointers from
118 the stack or registers may point to anywhere inside an object.
119 The same is true for heap pointers if the collector is compiled with
120 ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS defined, as is now the default.
122 Compiling without ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS may reduce accidental retention
123 of garbage objects, by requiring pointers from the heap to to the beginning
124 of an object. But this no longer appears to be a significant
125 issue for most programs.
127 There are a number of routines which modify the pointer recognition
128 algorithm. GC_register_displacement allows certain interior pointers
129 to be recognized even if ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS is nor defined.
130 GC_malloc_ignore_off_page allows some pointers into the middle of large objects
131 to be disregarded, greatly reducing the probablility of accidental
132 retention of large objects. For most purposes it seems best to compile
133 with ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS and to use GC_malloc_ignore_off_page if
134 you get collector warnings from allocations of very large objects.
135 See README.debugging for details.
137 WARNING: pointers inside memory allocated by the standard "malloc" are not
138 seen by the garbage collector. Thus objects pointed to only from such a
139 region may be prematurely deallocated. It is thus suggested that the
140 standard "malloc" be used only for memory regions, such as I/O buffers, that
141 are guaranteed not to contain pointers to garbage collectable memory.
142 Pointers in C language automatic, static, or register variables,
143 are correctly recognized. (Note that GC_malloc_uncollectable has semantics
144 similar to standard malloc, but allocates objects that are traced by the
147 WARNING: the collector does not always know how to find pointers in data
148 areas that are associated with dynamic libraries. This is easy to
149 remedy IF you know how to find those data areas on your operating
150 system (see GC_add_roots). Code for doing this under SunOS, IRIX 5.X and 6.X,
151 HP/UX, Alpha OSF/1, Linux, and win32 is included and used by default. (See
152 README.win32 for win32 details.) On other systems pointers from dynamic
153 library data areas may not be considered by the collector.
154 If you're writing a program that depends on the collector scanning
155 dynamic library data areas, it may be a good idea to include at least
156 one call to GC_is_visible() to ensure that those areas are visible
159 Note that the garbage collector does not need to be informed of shared
160 read-only data. However if the shared library mechanism can introduce
161 discontiguous data areas that may contain pointers, then the collector does
164 Signal processing for most signals may be deferred during collection,
165 and during uninterruptible parts of the allocation process.
166 Like standard ANSI C mallocs, by default it is unsafe to invoke
167 malloc (and other GC routines) from a signal handler while another
168 malloc call may be in progress. Removing -DNO_SIGNALS from Makefile
169 attempts to remedy that. But that may not be reliable with a compiler that
170 substantially reorders memory operations inside GC_malloc.
172 The allocator/collector can also be configured for thread-safe operation.
173 (Full signal safety can also be achieved, but only at the cost of two system
174 calls per malloc, which is usually unacceptable.)
175 WARNING: the collector does not guarantee to scan thread-local storage
176 (e.g. of the kind accessed with pthread_getspecific()). The collector
177 does scan thread stacks, though, so generally the best solution is to
178 ensure that any pointers stored in thread-local storage are also
179 stored on the thread's stack for the duration of their lifetime.
180 (This is arguably a longstanding bug, but it hasn't been fixed yet.)
182 INSTALLATION AND PORTABILITY
184 As distributed, the macro SILENT is defined in Makefile.
185 In the event of problems, this can be removed to obtain a moderate
186 amount of descriptive output for each collection.
187 (The given statistics exhibit a few peculiarities.
188 Things don't appear to add up for a variety of reasons, most notably
189 fragmentation losses. These are probably much more significant for the
190 contrived program "test.c" than for your application.)
192 Note that typing "make test" will automatically build the collector
193 and then run setjmp_test and gctest. Setjmp_test will give you information
194 about configuring the collector, which is useful primarily if you have
195 a machine that's not already supported. Gctest is a somewhat superficial
196 test of collector functionality. Failure is indicated by a core dump or
197 a message to the effect that the collector is broken. Gctest takes about
198 35 seconds to run on a SPARCstation 2. It may use up to 8 MB of memory. (The
199 multi-threaded version will use more. 64-bit versions may use more.)
200 "Make test" will also, as its last step, attempt to build and test the
201 "cord" string library. This will fail without an ANSI C compiler, but
202 the garbage collector itself should still be usable.
204 The Makefile will generate a library gc.a which you should link against.
205 Typing "make cords" will add the cord library to gc.a.
206 Note that this requires an ANSI C compiler.
208 It is suggested that if you need to replace a piece of the collector
209 (e.g. GC_mark_rts.c) you simply list your version ahead of gc.a on the
210 ld command line, rather than replacing the one in gc.a. (This will
211 generate numerous warnings under some versions of AIX, but it still
214 All include files that need to be used by clients will be put in the
215 include subdirectory. (Normally this is just gc.h. "Make cords" adds
216 "cord.h" and "ec.h".)
218 The collector currently is designed to run essentially unmodified on
219 machines that use a flat 32-bit or 64-bit address space.
220 That includes the vast majority of Workstations and X86 (X >= 3) PCs.
221 (The list here was deleted because it was getting too long and constantly
223 It does NOT run under plain 16-bit DOS or Windows 3.X. There are however
224 various packages (e.g. win32s, djgpp) that allow flat 32-bit address
225 applications to run under those systemsif the have at least an 80386 processor,
226 and several of those are compatible with the collector.
228 In a few cases (Amiga, OS/2, Win32, MacOS) a separate makefile
229 or equivalent is supplied. Many of these have separate README.system
232 Dynamic libraries are completely supported only under SunOS/Solaris,
233 (and even that support is not functional on the last Sun 3 release),
234 Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, IRIX 5&6, HP/UX, Win32 (not Win32S) and OSF/1
235 on DEC AXP machines plus perhaps a few others listed near the top
236 of dyn_load.c. On other machines we recommend that you do one of
239 1) Add dynamic library support (and send us the code).
240 2) Use static versions of the libraries.
241 3) Arrange for dynamic libraries to use the standard malloc.
242 This is still dangerous if the library stores a pointer to a
243 garbage collected object. But nearly all standard interfaces
244 prohibit this, because they deal correctly with pointers
245 to stack allocated objects. (Strtok is an exception. Don't
248 In all cases we assume that pointer alignment is consistent with that
249 enforced by the standard C compilers. If you use a nonstandard compiler
250 you may have to adjust the alignment parameters defined in gc_priv.h.
251 Note that this may also be an issue with packed records/structs, if those
252 enforce less alignment for pointers.
254 A port to a machine that is not byte addressed, or does not use 32 bit
255 or 64 bit addresses will require a major effort. A port to plain MSDOS
258 For machines not already mentioned, or for nonstandard compilers, the
259 following are likely to require change:
261 1. The parameters in gcconfig.h.
262 The parameters that will usually require adjustment are
263 STACKBOTTOM, ALIGNMENT and DATASTART. Setjmp_test
264 prints its guesses of the first two.
265 DATASTART should be an expression for computing the
266 address of the beginning of the data segment. This can often be
267 &etext. But some memory management units require that there be
268 some unmapped space between the text and the data segment. Thus
269 it may be more complicated. On UNIX systems, this is rarely
270 documented. But the adb "$m" command may be helpful. (Note
271 that DATASTART will usually be a function of &etext. Thus a
272 single experiment is usually insufficient.)
273 STACKBOTTOM is used to initialize GC_stackbottom, which
274 should be a sufficient approximation to the coldest stack address.
275 On some machines, it is difficult to obtain such a value that is
276 valid across a variety of MMUs, OS releases, etc. A number of
277 alternatives exist for using the collector in spite of this. See the
278 discussion in gcconfig.h immediately preceding the various
279 definitions of STACKBOTTOM.
282 The most important routine here is one to mark from registers.
283 The distributed file includes a generic hack (based on setjmp) that
284 happens to work on many machines, and may work on yours. Try
285 compiling and running setjmp_t.c to see whether it has a chance of
286 working. (This is not correct C, so don't blame your compiler if it
287 doesn't work. Based on limited experience, register window machines
288 are likely to cause trouble. If your version of setjmp claims that
289 all accessible variables, including registers, have the value they
290 had at the time of the longjmp, it also will not work. Vanilla 4.2 BSD
291 on Vaxen makes such a claim. SunOS does not.)
292 If your compiler does not allow in-line assembly code, or if you prefer
293 not to use such a facility, mach_dep.c may be replaced by a .s file
294 (as we did for the MIPS machine and the PC/RT).
295 At this point enough architectures are supported by mach_dep.c
296 that you will rarely need to do more than adjust for assembler
299 3. os_dep.c (and gc_priv.h).
300 Several kinds of operating system dependent routines reside here.
301 Many are optional. Several are invoked only through corresponding
302 macros in gc_priv.h, which may also be redefined as appropriate.
303 The routine GC_register_data_segments is crucial. It registers static
304 data areas that must be traversed by the collector. (User calls to
305 GC_add_roots may sometimes be used for similar effect.)
306 Routines to obtain memory from the OS also reside here.
307 Alternatively this can be done entirely by the macro GET_MEM
308 defined in gc_priv.h. Routines to disable and reenable signals
309 also reside here if they are need by the macros DISABLE_SIGNALS
310 and ENABLE_SIGNALS defined in gc_priv.h.
311 In a multithreaded environment, the macros LOCK and UNLOCK
312 in gc_priv.h will need to be suitably redefined.
313 The incremental collector requires page dirty information, which
314 is acquired through routines defined in os_dep.c. Unless directed
315 otherwise by gcconfig.h, these are implemented as stubs that simply
316 treat all pages as dirty. (This of course makes the incremental
317 collector much less useful.)
320 This provides a routine that allows the collector to scan data
321 segments associated with dynamic libraries. Often it is not
322 necessary to provide this routine unless user-written dynamic
325 For a different version of UN*X or different machines using the
326 Motorola 68000, Vax, SPARC, 80386, NS 32000, PC/RT, or MIPS architecture,
327 it should frequently suffice to change definitions in gcconfig.h.
330 THE C INTERFACE TO THE ALLOCATOR
332 The following routines are intended to be directly called by the user.
333 Note that usually only GC_malloc is necessary. GC_clear_roots and GC_add_roots
334 calls may be required if the collector has to trace from nonstandard places
335 (e.g. from dynamic library data areas on a machine on which the
336 collector doesn't already understand them.) On some machines, it may
337 be desirable to set GC_stacktop to a good approximation of the stack base.
338 (This enhances code portability on HP PA machines, since there is no
339 good way for the collector to compute this value.) Client code may include
340 "gc.h", which defines all of the following, plus many others.
343 - allocate an object of size nbytes. Unlike malloc, the object is
344 cleared before being returned to the user. Gc_malloc will
345 invoke the garbage collector when it determines this to be appropriate.
346 GC_malloc may return 0 if it is unable to acquire sufficient
347 space from the operating system. This is the most probable
348 consequence of running out of space. Other possible consequences
349 are that a function call will fail due to lack of stack space,
350 or that the collector will fail in other ways because it cannot
351 maintain its internal data structures, or that a crucial system
352 process will fail and take down the machine. Most of these
353 possibilities are independent of the malloc implementation.
355 2) GC_malloc_atomic(nbytes)
356 - allocate an object of size nbytes that is guaranteed not to contain any
357 pointers. The returned object is not guaranteed to be cleared.
358 (Can always be replaced by GC_malloc, but results in faster collection
359 times. The collector will probably run faster if large character
360 arrays, etc. are allocated with GC_malloc_atomic than if they are
361 statically allocated.)
363 3) GC_realloc(object, new_size)
364 - change the size of object to be new_size. Returns a pointer to the
365 new object, which may, or may not, be the same as the pointer to
366 the old object. The new object is taken to be atomic iff the old one
367 was. If the new object is composite and larger than the original object,
368 then the newly added bytes are cleared (we hope). This is very likely
369 to allocate a new object, unless MERGE_SIZES is defined in gc_priv.h.
370 Even then, it is likely to recycle the old object only if the object
371 is grown in small additive increments (which, we claim, is generally bad
375 - explicitly deallocate an object returned by GC_malloc or
376 GC_malloc_atomic. Not necessary, but can be used to minimize
377 collections if performance is critical. Probably a performance
378 loss for very small objects (<= 8 bytes).
380 5) GC_expand_hp(bytes)
381 - Explicitly increase the heap size. (This is normally done automatically
382 if a garbage collection failed to GC_reclaim enough memory. Explicit
383 calls to GC_expand_hp may prevent unnecessarily frequent collections at
386 6) GC_malloc_ignore_off_page(bytes)
387 - identical to GC_malloc, but the client promises to keep a pointer to
388 the somewhere within the first 256 bytes of the object while it is
389 live. (This pointer should nortmally be declared volatile to prevent
390 interference from compiler optimizations.) This is the recommended
391 way to allocate anything that is likely to be larger than 100Kbytes
392 or so. (GC_malloc may result in failure to reclaim such objects.)
394 7) GC_set_warn_proc(proc)
395 - Can be used to redirect warnings from the collector. Such warnings
396 should be rare, and should not be ignored during code development.
398 8) GC_enable_incremental()
399 - Enables generational and incremental collection. Useful for large
400 heaps on machines that provide access to page dirty information.
401 Some dirty bit implementations may interfere with debugging
402 (by catching address faults) and place restrictions on heap arguments
403 to system calls (since write faults inside a system call may not be
406 9) Several routines to allow for registration of finalization code.
407 User supplied finalization code may be invoked when an object becomes
408 unreachable. To call (*f)(obj, x) when obj becomes inaccessible, use
409 GC_register_finalizer(obj, f, x, 0, 0);
410 For more sophisticated uses, and for finalization ordering issues,
413 The global variable GC_free_space_divisor may be adjusted up from its
414 default value of 4 to use less space and more collection time, or down for
415 the opposite effect. Setting it to 1 or 0 will effectively disable collections
416 and cause all allocations to simply grow the heap.
418 The variable GC_non_gc_bytes, which is normally 0, may be changed to reflect
419 the amount of memory allocated by the above routines that should not be
420 considered as a candidate for collection. Careless use may, of course, result
421 in excessive memory consumption.
423 Some additional tuning is possible through the parameters defined
424 near the top of gc_priv.h.
426 If only GC_malloc is intended to be used, it might be appropriate to define:
428 #define malloc(n) GC_malloc(n)
429 #define calloc(m,n) GC_malloc((m)*(n))
431 For small pieces of VERY allocation intensive code, gc_inl.h
432 includes some allocation macros that may be used in place of GC_malloc
435 All externally visible names in the garbage collector start with "GC_".
436 To avoid name conflicts, client code should avoid this prefix, except when
437 accessing garbage collector routines or variables.
439 There are provisions for allocation with explicit type information.
440 This is rarely necessary. Details can be found in gc_typed.h.
442 THE C++ INTERFACE TO THE ALLOCATOR:
444 The Ellis-Hull C++ interface to the collector is included in
445 the collector distribution. If you intend to use this, type
446 "make c++" after the initial build of the collector is complete.
447 See gc_cpp.h for the definition of the interface. This interface
448 tries to approximate the Ellis-Detlefs C++ garbage collection
449 proposal without compiler changes.
452 1. Arrays allocated without new placement syntax are
453 allocated as uncollectable objects. They are traced by the
454 collector, but will not be reclaimed.
456 2. Failure to use "make c++" in combination with (1) will
457 result in arrays allocated using the default new operator.
458 This is likely to result in disaster without linker warnings.
460 3. If your compiler supports an overloaded new[] operator,
461 then gc_cpp.cc and gc_cpp.h should be suitably modified.
463 4. Many current C++ compilers have deficiencies that
464 break some of the functionality. See the comments in gc_cpp.h
465 for suggested workarounds.
467 USE AS LEAK DETECTOR:
469 The collector may be used to track down leaks in C programs that are
470 intended to run with malloc/free (e.g. code with extreme real-time or
471 portability constraints). To do so define FIND_LEAK in Makefile
472 This will cause the collector to invoke the report_leak
473 routine defined near the top of reclaim.c whenever an inaccessible
474 object is found that has not been explicitly freed. Such objects will
475 also be automatically reclaimed.
476 Productive use of this facility normally involves redefining report_leak
477 to do something more intelligent. This typically requires annotating
478 objects with additional information (e.g. creation time stack trace) that
479 identifies their origin. Such code is typically not very portable, and is
480 not included here, except on SPARC machines.
481 If all objects are allocated with GC_DEBUG_MALLOC (see next section),
482 then the default version of report_leak will report the source file
483 and line number at which the leaked object was allocated. This may
484 sometimes be sufficient. (On SPARC/SUNOS4 machines, it will also report
485 a cryptic stack trace. This can often be turned into a sympolic stack
486 trace by invoking program "foo" with "callprocs foo". Callprocs is
487 a short shell script that invokes adb to expand program counter values
488 to symbolic addresses. It was largely supplied by Scott Schwartz.)
489 Note that the debugging facilities described in the next section can
490 sometimes be slightly LESS effective in leak finding mode, since in
491 leak finding mode, GC_debug_free actually results in reuse of the object.
492 (Otherwise the object is simply marked invalid.) Also note that the test
493 program is not designed to run meaningfully in FIND_LEAK mode.
494 Use "make gc.a" to build the collector.
496 DEBUGGING FACILITIES:
498 The routines GC_debug_malloc, GC_debug_malloc_atomic, GC_debug_realloc,
499 and GC_debug_free provide an alternate interface to the collector, which
500 provides some help with memory overwrite errors, and the like.
501 Objects allocated in this way are annotated with additional
502 information. Some of this information is checked during garbage
503 collections, and detected inconsistencies are reported to stderr.
505 Simple cases of writing past the end of an allocated object should
506 be caught if the object is explicitly deallocated, or if the
507 collector is invoked while the object is live. The first deallocation
508 of an object will clear the debugging info associated with an
509 object, so accidentally repeated calls to GC_debug_free will report the
510 deallocation of an object without debugging information. Out of
511 memory errors will be reported to stderr, in addition to returning
514 GC_debug_malloc checking during garbage collection is enabled
515 with the first call to GC_debug_malloc. This will result in some
516 slowdown during collections. If frequent heap checks are desired,
517 this can be achieved by explicitly invoking GC_gcollect, e.g. from
520 GC_debug_malloc allocated objects should not be passed to GC_realloc
521 or GC_free, and conversely. It is however acceptable to allocate only
522 some objects with GC_debug_malloc, and to use GC_malloc for other objects,
523 provided the two pools are kept distinct. In this case, there is a very
524 low probablility that GC_malloc allocated objects may be misidentified as
525 having been overwritten. This should happen with probability at most
526 one in 2**32. This probability is zero if GC_debug_malloc is never called.
528 GC_debug_malloc, GC_malloc_atomic, and GC_debug_realloc take two
529 additional trailing arguments, a string and an integer. These are not
530 interpreted by the allocator. They are stored in the object (the string is
531 not copied). If an error involving the object is detected, they are printed.
533 The macros GC_MALLOC, GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC, GC_REALLOC, GC_FREE, and
534 GC_REGISTER_FINALIZER are also provided. These require the same arguments
535 as the corresponding (nondebugging) routines. If gc.h is included
536 with GC_DEBUG defined, they call the debugging versions of these
537 functions, passing the current file name and line number as the two
538 extra arguments, where appropriate. If gc.h is included without GC_DEBUG
539 defined, then all these macros will instead be defined to their nondebugging
540 equivalents. (GC_REGISTER_FINALIZER is necessary, since pointers to
541 objects with debugging information are really pointers to a displacement
542 of 16 bytes form the object beginning, and some translation is necessary
543 when finalization routines are invoked. For details, about what's stored
544 in the header, see the definition of the type oh in debug_malloc.c)
546 INCREMENTAL/GENERATIONAL COLLECTION:
548 The collector normally interrupts client code for the duration of
549 a garbage collection mark phase. This may be unacceptable if interactive
550 response is needed for programs with large heaps. The collector
551 can also run in a "generational" mode, in which it usually attempts to
552 collect only objects allocated since the last garbage collection.
553 Furthermore, in this mode, garbage collections run mostly incrementally,
554 with a small amount of work performed in response to each of a large number of
557 This mode is enabled by a call to GC_enable_incremental().
559 Incremental and generational collection is effective in reducing
560 pause times only if the collector has some way to tell which objects
561 or pages have been recently modified. The collector uses two sources
564 1. Information provided by the VM system. This may be provided in
565 one of several forms. Under Solaris 2.X (and potentially under other
566 similar systems) information on dirty pages can be read from the
567 /proc file system. Under other systems (currently SunOS4.X) it is
568 possible to write-protect the heap, and catch the resulting faults.
569 On these systems we require that system calls writing to the heap
570 (other than read) be handled specially by client code.
571 See os_dep.c for details.
573 2. Information supplied by the programmer. We define "stubborn"
574 objects to be objects that are rarely changed. Such an object
575 can be allocated (and enabled for writing) with GC_malloc_stubborn.
576 Once it has been initialized, the collector should be informed with
577 a call to GC_end_stubborn_change. Subsequent writes that store
578 pointers into the object must be preceded by a call to
581 This mechanism performs best for objects that are written only for
582 initialization, and such that only one stubborn object is writable
583 at once. It is typically not worth using for short-lived
584 objects. Stubborn objects are treated less efficiently than pointerfree
587 A rough rule of thumb is that, in the absence of VM information, garbage
588 collection pauses are proportional to the amount of pointerful storage
589 plus the amount of modified "stubborn" storage that is reachable during
592 Initial allocation of stubborn objects takes longer than allocation
593 of other objects, since other data structures need to be maintained.
595 We recommend against random use of stubborn objects in client
596 code, since bugs caused by inappropriate writes to stubborn objects
597 are likely to be very infrequently observed and hard to trace.
598 However, their use may be appropriate in a few carefully written
599 library routines that do not make the objects themselves available
600 for writing by client code.
605 Any memory that does not have a recognizable pointer to it will be
606 reclaimed. Exclusive-or'ing forward and backward links in a list
608 Some C optimizers may lose the last undisguised pointer to a memory
609 object as a consequence of clever optimizations. This has almost
610 never been observed in practice. Send mail to boehm@acm.org
611 for suggestions on how to fix your compiler.
612 This is not a real-time collector. In the standard configuration,
613 percentage of time required for collection should be constant across
614 heap sizes. But collection pauses will increase for larger heaps.
615 (On SPARCstation 2s collection times will be on the order of 300 msecs
616 per MB of accessible memory that needs to be scanned. Your mileage
617 may vary.) The incremental/generational collection facility helps,
618 but is portable only if "stubborn" allocation is used.
619 Please address bug reports to boehm@acm.org. If you are
620 contemplating a major addition, you might also send mail to ask whether
621 it's already been done (or whether we tried and discarded it).