2 * Budget Fair Queueing (BFQ) I/O scheduler.
4 * Based on ideas and code from CFQ:
5 * Copyright (C) 2003 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
7 * Copyright (C) 2008 Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>
8 * Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
10 * Copyright (C) 2010 Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
11 * Arianna Avanzini <avanzini@google.com>
13 * Copyright (C) 2017 Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
15 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
16 * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
17 * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
18 * License, or (at your option) any later version.
20 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
21 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
22 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
23 * General Public License for more details.
25 * BFQ is a proportional-share I/O scheduler, with some extra
26 * low-latency capabilities. BFQ also supports full hierarchical
27 * scheduling through cgroups. Next paragraphs provide an introduction
28 * on BFQ inner workings. Details on BFQ benefits, usage and
29 * limitations can be found in Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt.
31 * BFQ is a proportional-share storage-I/O scheduling algorithm based
32 * on the slice-by-slice service scheme of CFQ. But BFQ assigns
33 * budgets, measured in number of sectors, to processes instead of
34 * time slices. The device is not granted to the in-service process
35 * for a given time slice, but until it has exhausted its assigned
36 * budget. This change from the time to the service domain enables BFQ
37 * to distribute the device throughput among processes as desired,
38 * without any distortion due to throughput fluctuations, or to device
39 * internal queueing. BFQ uses an ad hoc internal scheduler, called
40 * B-WF2Q+, to schedule processes according to their budgets. More
41 * precisely, BFQ schedules queues associated with processes. Each
42 * process/queue is assigned a user-configurable weight, and B-WF2Q+
43 * guarantees that each queue receives a fraction of the throughput
44 * proportional to its weight. Thanks to the accurate policy of
45 * B-WF2Q+, BFQ can afford to assign high budgets to I/O-bound
46 * processes issuing sequential requests (to boost the throughput),
47 * and yet guarantee a low latency to interactive and soft real-time
50 * In particular, to provide these low-latency guarantees, BFQ
51 * explicitly privileges the I/O of two classes of time-sensitive
52 * applications: interactive and soft real-time. This feature enables
53 * BFQ to provide applications in these classes with a very low
54 * latency. Finally, BFQ also features additional heuristics for
55 * preserving both a low latency and a high throughput on NCQ-capable,
56 * rotational or flash-based devices, and to get the job done quickly
57 * for applications consisting in many I/O-bound processes.
59 * NOTE: if the main or only goal, with a given device, is to achieve
60 * the maximum-possible throughput at all times, then do switch off
61 * all low-latency heuristics for that device, by setting low_latency
64 * BFQ is described in [1], where also a reference to the initial, more
65 * theoretical paper on BFQ can be found. The interested reader can find
66 * in the latter paper full details on the main algorithm, as well as
67 * formulas of the guarantees and formal proofs of all the properties.
68 * With respect to the version of BFQ presented in these papers, this
69 * implementation adds a few more heuristics, such as the one that
70 * guarantees a low latency to soft real-time applications, and a
71 * hierarchical extension based on H-WF2Q+.
73 * B-WF2Q+ is based on WF2Q+, which is described in [2], together with
74 * H-WF2Q+, while the augmented tree used here to implement B-WF2Q+
75 * with O(log N) complexity derives from the one introduced with EEVDF
78 * [1] P. Valente, A. Avanzini, "Evolution of the BFQ Storage I/O
79 * Scheduler", Proceedings of the First Workshop on Mobile System
80 * Technologies (MST-2015), May 2015.
81 * http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/mst-2015.pdf
83 * [2] Jon C.R. Bennett and H. Zhang, "Hierarchical Packet Fair Queueing
84 * Algorithms", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(5):675-689,
87 * http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/papers/TON-97-Oct.ps.gz
89 * [3] I. Stoica and H. Abdel-Wahab, "Earliest Eligible Virtual Deadline
90 * First: A Flexible and Accurate Mechanism for Proportional Share
91 * Resource Allocation", technical report.
93 * http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~istoica/papers/eevdf-tr-95.pdf
95 #include <linux/module.h>
96 #include <linux/slab.h>
97 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
98 #include <linux/cgroup.h>
99 #include <linux/elevator.h>
100 #include <linux/ktime.h>
101 #include <linux/rbtree.h>
102 #include <linux/ioprio.h>
103 #include <linux/sbitmap.h>
104 #include <linux/delay.h>
108 #include "blk-mq-tag.h"
109 #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
110 #include "bfq-iosched.h"
113 #define BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(name) \
114 void bfq_mark_bfqq_##name(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
116 __set_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
118 void bfq_clear_bfqq_##name(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
120 __clear_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
122 int bfq_bfqq_##name(const struct bfq_queue *bfqq) \
124 return test_bit(BFQQF_##name, &(bfqq)->flags); \
127 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(just_created
);
129 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(wait_request
);
130 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(non_blocking_wait_rq
);
131 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(fifo_expire
);
132 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(has_short_ttime
);
134 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(IO_bound
);
135 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(in_large_burst
);
137 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(split_coop
);
138 BFQ_BFQQ_FNS(softrt_update
);
139 #undef BFQ_BFQQ_FNS \
141 /* Expiration time of sync (0) and async (1) requests, in ns. */
142 static const u64 bfq_fifo_expire
[2] = { NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 4, NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 8 };
144 /* Maximum backwards seek (magic number lifted from CFQ), in KiB. */
145 static const int bfq_back_max
= 16 * 1024;
147 /* Penalty of a backwards seek, in number of sectors. */
148 static const int bfq_back_penalty
= 2;
150 /* Idling period duration, in ns. */
151 static u64 bfq_slice_idle
= NSEC_PER_SEC
/ 125;
153 /* Minimum number of assigned budgets for which stats are safe to compute. */
154 static const int bfq_stats_min_budgets
= 194;
156 /* Default maximum budget values, in sectors and number of requests. */
157 static const int bfq_default_max_budget
= 16 * 1024;
160 * Async to sync throughput distribution is controlled as follows:
161 * when an async request is served, the entity is charged the number
162 * of sectors of the request, multiplied by the factor below
164 static const int bfq_async_charge_factor
= 10;
166 /* Default timeout values, in jiffies, approximating CFQ defaults. */
167 const int bfq_timeout
= HZ
/ 8;
169 static struct kmem_cache
*bfq_pool
;
171 /* Below this threshold (in ns), we consider thinktime immediate. */
172 #define BFQ_MIN_TT (2 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
174 /* hw_tag detection: parallel requests threshold and min samples needed. */
175 #define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD 4
176 #define BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES 32
178 #define BFQQ_SEEK_THR (sector_t)(8 * 100)
179 #define BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT (sector_t)(2 * 32)
180 #define BFQQ_CLOSE_THR (sector_t)(8 * 1024)
181 #define BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq) (hweight32(bfqq->seek_history) > 32/8)
183 /* Min number of samples required to perform peak-rate update */
184 #define BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES 32
185 /* Min observation time interval required to perform a peak-rate update (ns) */
186 #define BFQ_RATE_MIN_INTERVAL (300*NSEC_PER_MSEC)
187 /* Target observation time interval for a peak-rate update (ns) */
188 #define BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL NSEC_PER_SEC
190 /* Shift used for peak rate fixed precision calculations. */
191 #define BFQ_RATE_SHIFT 16
194 * By default, BFQ computes the duration of the weight raising for
195 * interactive applications automatically, using the following formula:
196 * duration = (R / r) * T, where r is the peak rate of the device, and
197 * R and T are two reference parameters.
198 * In particular, R is the peak rate of the reference device (see below),
199 * and T is a reference time: given the systems that are likely to be
200 * installed on the reference device according to its speed class, T is
201 * about the maximum time needed, under BFQ and while reading two files in
202 * parallel, to load typical large applications on these systems.
203 * In practice, the slower/faster the device at hand is, the more/less it
204 * takes to load applications with respect to the reference device.
205 * Accordingly, the longer/shorter BFQ grants weight raising to interactive
208 * BFQ uses four different reference pairs (R, T), depending on:
209 * . whether the device is rotational or non-rotational;
210 * . whether the device is slow, such as old or portable HDDs, as well as
211 * SD cards, or fast, such as newer HDDs and SSDs.
213 * The device's speed class is dynamically (re)detected in
214 * bfq_update_peak_rate() every time the estimated peak rate is updated.
216 * In the following definitions, R_slow[0]/R_fast[0] and
217 * T_slow[0]/T_fast[0] are the reference values for a slow/fast
218 * rotational device, whereas R_slow[1]/R_fast[1] and
219 * T_slow[1]/T_fast[1] are the reference values for a slow/fast
220 * non-rotational device. Finally, device_speed_thresh are the
221 * thresholds used to switch between speed classes. The reference
222 * rates are not the actual peak rates of the devices used as a
223 * reference, but slightly lower values. The reason for using these
224 * slightly lower values is that the peak-rate estimator tends to
225 * yield slightly lower values than the actual peak rate (it can yield
226 * the actual peak rate only if there is only one process doing I/O,
227 * and the process does sequential I/O).
229 * Both the reference peak rates and the thresholds are measured in
230 * sectors/usec, left-shifted by BFQ_RATE_SHIFT.
232 static int R_slow
[2] = {1000, 10700};
233 static int R_fast
[2] = {14000, 33000};
235 * To improve readability, a conversion function is used to initialize the
236 * following arrays, which entails that they can be initialized only in a
239 static int T_slow
[2];
240 static int T_fast
[2];
241 static int device_speed_thresh
[2];
243 #define RQ_BIC(rq) icq_to_bic((rq)->elv.priv[0])
244 #define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1])
246 struct bfq_queue
*bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool is_sync
)
248 return bic
->bfqq
[is_sync
];
251 void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, bool is_sync
)
253 bic
->bfqq
[is_sync
] = bfqq
;
256 struct bfq_data
*bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
258 return bic
->icq
.q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
262 * icq_to_bic - convert iocontext queue structure to bfq_io_cq.
263 * @icq: the iocontext queue.
265 static struct bfq_io_cq
*icq_to_bic(struct io_cq
*icq
)
267 /* bic->icq is the first member, %NULL will convert to %NULL */
268 return container_of(icq
, struct bfq_io_cq
, icq
);
272 * bfq_bic_lookup - search into @ioc a bic associated to @bfqd.
273 * @bfqd: the lookup key.
274 * @ioc: the io_context of the process doing I/O.
275 * @q: the request queue.
277 static struct bfq_io_cq
*bfq_bic_lookup(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
278 struct io_context
*ioc
,
279 struct request_queue
*q
)
283 struct bfq_io_cq
*icq
;
285 spin_lock_irqsave(q
->queue_lock
, flags
);
286 icq
= icq_to_bic(ioc_lookup_icq(ioc
, q
));
287 spin_unlock_irqrestore(q
->queue_lock
, flags
);
296 * Scheduler run of queue, if there are requests pending and no one in the
297 * driver that will restart queueing.
299 void bfq_schedule_dispatch(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
301 if (bfqd
->queued
!= 0) {
302 bfq_log(bfqd
, "schedule dispatch");
303 blk_mq_run_hw_queues(bfqd
->queue
, true);
307 #define bfq_class_idle(bfqq) ((bfqq)->ioprio_class == IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE)
308 #define bfq_class_rt(bfqq) ((bfqq)->ioprio_class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
310 #define bfq_sample_valid(samples) ((samples) > 80)
313 * Lifted from AS - choose which of rq1 and rq2 that is best served now.
314 * We choose the request that is closesr to the head right now. Distance
315 * behind the head is penalized and only allowed to a certain extent.
317 static struct request
*bfq_choose_req(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
322 sector_t s1
, s2
, d1
= 0, d2
= 0;
323 unsigned long back_max
;
324 #define BFQ_RQ1_WRAP 0x01 /* request 1 wraps */
325 #define BFQ_RQ2_WRAP 0x02 /* request 2 wraps */
326 unsigned int wrap
= 0; /* bit mask: requests behind the disk head? */
328 if (!rq1
|| rq1
== rq2
)
333 if (rq_is_sync(rq1
) && !rq_is_sync(rq2
))
335 else if (rq_is_sync(rq2
) && !rq_is_sync(rq1
))
337 if ((rq1
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
) && !(rq2
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
))
339 else if ((rq2
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
) && !(rq1
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
))
342 s1
= blk_rq_pos(rq1
);
343 s2
= blk_rq_pos(rq2
);
346 * By definition, 1KiB is 2 sectors.
348 back_max
= bfqd
->bfq_back_max
* 2;
351 * Strict one way elevator _except_ in the case where we allow
352 * short backward seeks which are biased as twice the cost of a
353 * similar forward seek.
357 else if (s1
+ back_max
>= last
)
358 d1
= (last
- s1
) * bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
;
360 wrap
|= BFQ_RQ1_WRAP
;
364 else if (s2
+ back_max
>= last
)
365 d2
= (last
- s2
) * bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
;
367 wrap
|= BFQ_RQ2_WRAP
;
369 /* Found required data */
372 * By doing switch() on the bit mask "wrap" we avoid having to
373 * check two variables for all permutations: --> faster!
376 case 0: /* common case for CFQ: rq1 and rq2 not wrapped */
391 case BFQ_RQ1_WRAP
|BFQ_RQ2_WRAP
: /* both rqs wrapped */
394 * Since both rqs are wrapped,
395 * start with the one that's further behind head
396 * (--> only *one* back seek required),
397 * since back seek takes more time than forward.
406 static struct bfq_queue
*
407 bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct rb_root
*root
,
408 sector_t sector
, struct rb_node
**ret_parent
,
409 struct rb_node
***rb_link
)
411 struct rb_node
**p
, *parent
;
412 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= NULL
;
420 bfqq
= rb_entry(parent
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
423 * Sort strictly based on sector. Smallest to the left,
424 * largest to the right.
426 if (sector
> blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
))
428 else if (sector
< blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
))
436 *ret_parent
= parent
;
440 bfq_log(bfqd
, "rq_pos_tree_lookup %llu: returning %d",
441 (unsigned long long)sector
,
442 bfqq
? bfqq
->pid
: 0);
447 void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
449 struct rb_node
**p
, *parent
;
450 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
452 if (bfqq
->pos_root
) {
453 rb_erase(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
454 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
457 if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
462 bfqq
->pos_root
= &bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(bfqq
)->rq_pos_tree
;
463 __bfqq
= bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(bfqd
, bfqq
->pos_root
,
464 blk_rq_pos(bfqq
->next_rq
), &parent
, &p
);
466 rb_link_node(&bfqq
->pos_node
, parent
, p
);
467 rb_insert_color(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
469 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
473 * Tell whether there are active queues or groups with differentiated weights.
475 static bool bfq_differentiated_weights(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
478 * For weights to differ, at least one of the trees must contain
479 * at least two nodes.
481 return (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
) &&
482 (bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_left
||
483 bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_right
)
484 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
486 (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqd
->group_weights_tree
) &&
487 (bfqd
->group_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_left
||
488 bfqd
->group_weights_tree
.rb_node
->rb_right
)
494 * The following function returns true if every queue must receive the
495 * same share of the throughput (this condition is used when deciding
496 * whether idling may be disabled, see the comments in the function
497 * bfq_bfqq_may_idle()).
499 * Such a scenario occurs when:
500 * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
501 * 2) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
503 * 3) all active groups at the same level in the groups tree have the same
504 * number of children.
506 * Unfortunately, keeping the necessary state for evaluating exactly the
507 * above symmetry conditions would be quite complex and time-consuming.
508 * Therefore this function evaluates, instead, the following stronger
509 * sub-conditions, for which it is much easier to maintain the needed
511 * 1) all active queues have the same weight,
512 * 2) all active groups have the same weight,
513 * 3) all active groups have at most one active child each.
514 * In particular, the last two conditions are always true if hierarchical
515 * support and the cgroups interface are not enabled, thus no state needs
516 * to be maintained in this case.
518 static bool bfq_symmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
520 return !bfq_differentiated_weights(bfqd
);
524 * If the weight-counter tree passed as input contains no counter for
525 * the weight of the input entity, then add that counter; otherwise just
526 * increment the existing counter.
528 * Note that weight-counter trees contain few nodes in mostly symmetric
529 * scenarios. For example, if all queues have the same weight, then the
530 * weight-counter tree for the queues may contain at most one node.
531 * This holds even if low_latency is on, because weight-raised queues
532 * are not inserted in the tree.
533 * In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed
536 void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_entity
*entity
,
537 struct rb_root
*root
)
539 struct rb_node
**new = &(root
->rb_node
), *parent
= NULL
;
542 * Do not insert if the entity is already associated with a
543 * counter, which happens if:
544 * 1) the entity is associated with a queue,
545 * 2) a request arrival has caused the queue to become both
546 * non-weight-raised, and hence change its weight, and
547 * backlogged; in this respect, each of the two events
548 * causes an invocation of this function,
549 * 3) this is the invocation of this function caused by the
550 * second event. This second invocation is actually useless,
551 * and we handle this fact by exiting immediately. More
552 * efficient or clearer solutions might possibly be adopted.
554 if (entity
->weight_counter
)
558 struct bfq_weight_counter
*__counter
= container_of(*new,
559 struct bfq_weight_counter
,
563 if (entity
->weight
== __counter
->weight
) {
564 entity
->weight_counter
= __counter
;
567 if (entity
->weight
< __counter
->weight
)
568 new = &((*new)->rb_left
);
570 new = &((*new)->rb_right
);
573 entity
->weight_counter
= kzalloc(sizeof(struct bfq_weight_counter
),
577 * In the unlucky event of an allocation failure, we just
578 * exit. This will cause the weight of entity to not be
579 * considered in bfq_differentiated_weights, which, in its
580 * turn, causes the scenario to be deemed wrongly symmetric in
581 * case entity's weight would have been the only weight making
582 * the scenario asymmetric. On the bright side, no unbalance
583 * will however occur when entity becomes inactive again (the
584 * invocation of this function is triggered by an activation
585 * of entity). In fact, bfq_weights_tree_remove does nothing
586 * if !entity->weight_counter.
588 if (unlikely(!entity
->weight_counter
))
591 entity
->weight_counter
->weight
= entity
->weight
;
592 rb_link_node(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, parent
, new);
593 rb_insert_color(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, root
);
596 entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
++;
600 * Decrement the weight counter associated with the entity, and, if the
601 * counter reaches 0, remove the counter from the tree.
602 * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for considerations
605 void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_entity
*entity
,
606 struct rb_root
*root
)
608 if (!entity
->weight_counter
)
611 entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
--;
612 if (entity
->weight_counter
->num_active
> 0)
613 goto reset_entity_pointer
;
615 rb_erase(&entity
->weight_counter
->weights_node
, root
);
616 kfree(entity
->weight_counter
);
618 reset_entity_pointer
:
619 entity
->weight_counter
= NULL
;
623 * Return expired entry, or NULL to just start from scratch in rbtree.
625 static struct request
*bfq_check_fifo(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
626 struct request
*last
)
630 if (bfq_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
))
633 bfq_mark_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
);
635 rq
= rq_entry_fifo(bfqq
->fifo
.next
);
637 if (rq
== last
|| ktime_get_ns() < rq
->fifo_time
)
640 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "check_fifo: returned %p", rq
);
644 static struct request
*bfq_find_next_rq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
645 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
646 struct request
*last
)
648 struct rb_node
*rbnext
= rb_next(&last
->rb_node
);
649 struct rb_node
*rbprev
= rb_prev(&last
->rb_node
);
650 struct request
*next
, *prev
= NULL
;
652 /* Follow expired path, else get first next available. */
653 next
= bfq_check_fifo(bfqq
, last
);
658 prev
= rb_entry_rq(rbprev
);
661 next
= rb_entry_rq(rbnext
);
663 rbnext
= rb_first(&bfqq
->sort_list
);
664 if (rbnext
&& rbnext
!= &last
->rb_node
)
665 next
= rb_entry_rq(rbnext
);
668 return bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, next
, prev
, blk_rq_pos(last
));
671 /* see the definition of bfq_async_charge_factor for details */
672 static unsigned long bfq_serv_to_charge(struct request
*rq
,
673 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
675 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1)
676 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
679 * If there are no weight-raised queues, then amplify service
680 * by just the async charge factor; otherwise amplify service
681 * by twice the async charge factor, to further reduce latency
682 * for weight-raised queues.
684 if (bfqq
->bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
== 0)
685 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
) * bfq_async_charge_factor
;
687 return blk_rq_sectors(rq
) * 2 * bfq_async_charge_factor
;
691 * bfq_updated_next_req - update the queue after a new next_rq selection.
692 * @bfqd: the device data the queue belongs to.
693 * @bfqq: the queue to update.
695 * If the first request of a queue changes we make sure that the queue
696 * has enough budget to serve at least its first request (if the
697 * request has grown). We do this because if the queue has not enough
698 * budget for its first request, it has to go through two dispatch
699 * rounds to actually get it dispatched.
701 static void bfq_updated_next_req(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
702 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
704 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
705 struct request
*next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
706 unsigned long new_budget
;
711 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
)
713 * In order not to break guarantees, budgets cannot be
714 * changed after an entity has been selected.
718 new_budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
719 bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
));
720 if (entity
->budget
!= new_budget
) {
721 entity
->budget
= new_budget
;
722 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "updated next rq: new budget %lu",
724 bfq_requeue_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, false);
729 bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
730 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool bfq_already_existing
)
732 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
733 bool busy
= bfq_already_existing
&& bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
);
735 if (bic
->saved_has_short_ttime
)
736 bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
738 bfq_clear_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
740 if (bic
->saved_IO_bound
)
741 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
743 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
745 bfqq
->ttime
= bic
->saved_ttime
;
746 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bic
->saved_wr_coeff
;
747 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bic
->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
748 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= bic
->saved_last_wr_start_finish
;
749 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bic
->saved_wr_cur_max_time
;
751 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 && (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
) ||
752 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
753 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
))) {
754 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
,
755 "resume state: switching off wr");
760 /* make sure weight will be updated, however we got here */
761 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
766 if (old_wr_coeff
== 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1)
767 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
768 else if (old_wr_coeff
> 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
769 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
772 static int bfqq_process_refs(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
774 return bfqq
->ref
- bfqq
->allocated
- bfqq
->entity
.on_st
;
777 /* Empty burst list and add just bfqq (see comments on bfq_handle_burst) */
778 static void bfq_reset_burst_list(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
780 struct bfq_queue
*item
;
781 struct hlist_node
*n
;
783 hlist_for_each_entry_safe(item
, n
, &bfqd
->burst_list
, burst_list_node
)
784 hlist_del_init(&item
->burst_list_node
);
785 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
, &bfqd
->burst_list
);
786 bfqd
->burst_size
= 1;
787 bfqd
->burst_parent_entity
= bfqq
->entity
.parent
;
790 /* Add bfqq to the list of queues in current burst (see bfq_handle_burst) */
791 static void bfq_add_to_burst(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
793 /* Increment burst size to take into account also bfqq */
796 if (bfqd
->burst_size
== bfqd
->bfq_large_burst_thresh
) {
797 struct bfq_queue
*pos
, *bfqq_item
;
798 struct hlist_node
*n
;
801 * Enough queues have been activated shortly after each
802 * other to consider this burst as large.
804 bfqd
->large_burst
= true;
807 * We can now mark all queues in the burst list as
808 * belonging to a large burst.
810 hlist_for_each_entry(bfqq_item
, &bfqd
->burst_list
,
812 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq_item
);
813 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
816 * From now on, and until the current burst finishes, any
817 * new queue being activated shortly after the last queue
818 * was inserted in the burst can be immediately marked as
819 * belonging to a large burst. So the burst list is not
820 * needed any more. Remove it.
822 hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pos
, n
, &bfqd
->burst_list
,
824 hlist_del_init(&pos
->burst_list_node
);
826 * Burst not yet large: add bfqq to the burst list. Do
827 * not increment the ref counter for bfqq, because bfqq
828 * is removed from the burst list before freeing bfqq
831 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
, &bfqd
->burst_list
);
835 * If many queues belonging to the same group happen to be created
836 * shortly after each other, then the processes associated with these
837 * queues have typically a common goal. In particular, bursts of queue
838 * creations are usually caused by services or applications that spawn
839 * many parallel threads/processes. Examples are systemd during boot,
840 * or git grep. To help these processes get their job done as soon as
841 * possible, it is usually better to not grant either weight-raising
842 * or device idling to their queues.
844 * In this comment we describe, firstly, the reasons why this fact
845 * holds, and, secondly, the next function, which implements the main
846 * steps needed to properly mark these queues so that they can then be
847 * treated in a different way.
849 * The above services or applications benefit mostly from a high
850 * throughput: the quicker the requests of the activated queues are
851 * cumulatively served, the sooner the target job of these queues gets
852 * completed. As a consequence, weight-raising any of these queues,
853 * which also implies idling the device for it, is almost always
854 * counterproductive. In most cases it just lowers throughput.
856 * On the other hand, a burst of queue creations may be caused also by
857 * the start of an application that does not consist of a lot of
858 * parallel I/O-bound threads. In fact, with a complex application,
859 * several short processes may need to be executed to start-up the
860 * application. In this respect, to start an application as quickly as
861 * possible, the best thing to do is in any case to privilege the I/O
862 * related to the application with respect to all other
863 * I/O. Therefore, the best strategy to start as quickly as possible
864 * an application that causes a burst of queue creations is to
865 * weight-raise all the queues created during the burst. This is the
866 * exact opposite of the best strategy for the other type of bursts.
868 * In the end, to take the best action for each of the two cases, the
869 * two types of bursts need to be distinguished. Fortunately, this
870 * seems relatively easy, by looking at the sizes of the bursts. In
871 * particular, we found a threshold such that only bursts with a
872 * larger size than that threshold are apparently caused by
873 * services or commands such as systemd or git grep. For brevity,
874 * hereafter we call just 'large' these bursts. BFQ *does not*
875 * weight-raise queues whose creation occurs in a large burst. In
876 * addition, for each of these queues BFQ performs or does not perform
877 * idling depending on which choice boosts the throughput more. The
878 * exact choice depends on the device and request pattern at
881 * Unfortunately, false positives may occur while an interactive task
882 * is starting (e.g., an application is being started). The
883 * consequence is that the queues associated with the task do not
884 * enjoy weight raising as expected. Fortunately these false positives
885 * are very rare. They typically occur if some service happens to
886 * start doing I/O exactly when the interactive task starts.
888 * Turning back to the next function, it implements all the steps
889 * needed to detect the occurrence of a large burst and to properly
890 * mark all the queues belonging to it (so that they can then be
891 * treated in a different way). This goal is achieved by maintaining a
892 * "burst list" that holds, temporarily, the queues that belong to the
893 * burst in progress. The list is then used to mark these queues as
894 * belonging to a large burst if the burst does become large. The main
895 * steps are the following.
897 * . when the very first queue is created, the queue is inserted into the
898 * list (as it could be the first queue in a possible burst)
900 * . if the current burst has not yet become large, and a queue Q that does
901 * not yet belong to the burst is activated shortly after the last time
902 * at which a new queue entered the burst list, then the function appends
903 * Q to the burst list
905 * . if, as a consequence of the previous step, the burst size reaches
906 * the large-burst threshold, then
908 * . all the queues in the burst list are marked as belonging to a
911 * . the burst list is deleted; in fact, the burst list already served
912 * its purpose (keeping temporarily track of the queues in a burst,
913 * so as to be able to mark them as belonging to a large burst in the
914 * previous sub-step), and now is not needed any more
916 * . the device enters a large-burst mode
918 * . if a queue Q that does not belong to the burst is created while
919 * the device is in large-burst mode and shortly after the last time
920 * at which a queue either entered the burst list or was marked as
921 * belonging to the current large burst, then Q is immediately marked
922 * as belonging to a large burst.
924 * . if a queue Q that does not belong to the burst is created a while
925 * later, i.e., not shortly after, than the last time at which a queue
926 * either entered the burst list or was marked as belonging to the
927 * current large burst, then the current burst is deemed as finished and:
929 * . the large-burst mode is reset if set
931 * . the burst list is emptied
933 * . Q is inserted in the burst list, as Q may be the first queue
934 * in a possible new burst (then the burst list contains just Q
937 static void bfq_handle_burst(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
940 * If bfqq is already in the burst list or is part of a large
941 * burst, or finally has just been split, then there is
942 * nothing else to do.
944 if (!hlist_unhashed(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
) ||
945 bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
) ||
946 time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
947 msecs_to_jiffies(10)))
951 * If bfqq's creation happens late enough, or bfqq belongs to
952 * a different group than the burst group, then the current
953 * burst is finished, and related data structures must be
956 * In this respect, consider the special case where bfqq is
957 * the very first queue created after BFQ is selected for this
958 * device. In this case, last_ins_in_burst and
959 * burst_parent_entity are not yet significant when we get
960 * here. But it is easy to verify that, whether or not the
961 * following condition is true, bfqq will end up being
962 * inserted into the burst list. In particular the list will
963 * happen to contain only bfqq. And this is exactly what has
964 * to happen, as bfqq may be the first queue of the first
967 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqd
->last_ins_in_burst
+
968 bfqd
->bfq_burst_interval
) ||
969 bfqq
->entity
.parent
!= bfqd
->burst_parent_entity
) {
970 bfqd
->large_burst
= false;
971 bfq_reset_burst_list(bfqd
, bfqq
);
976 * If we get here, then bfqq is being activated shortly after the
977 * last queue. So, if the current burst is also large, we can mark
978 * bfqq as belonging to this large burst immediately.
980 if (bfqd
->large_burst
) {
981 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
986 * If we get here, then a large-burst state has not yet been
987 * reached, but bfqq is being activated shortly after the last
988 * queue. Then we add bfqq to the burst.
990 bfq_add_to_burst(bfqd
, bfqq
);
993 * At this point, bfqq either has been added to the current
994 * burst or has caused the current burst to terminate and a
995 * possible new burst to start. In particular, in the second
996 * case, bfqq has become the first queue in the possible new
997 * burst. In both cases last_ins_in_burst needs to be moved
1000 bfqd
->last_ins_in_burst
= jiffies
;
1003 static int bfq_bfqq_budget_left(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1005 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
1007 return entity
->budget
- entity
->service
;
1011 * If enough samples have been computed, return the current max budget
1012 * stored in bfqd, which is dynamically updated according to the
1013 * estimated disk peak rate; otherwise return the default max budget
1015 static int bfq_max_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1017 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
< bfq_stats_min_budgets
)
1018 return bfq_default_max_budget
;
1020 return bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
;
1024 * Return min budget, which is a fraction of the current or default
1025 * max budget (trying with 1/32)
1027 static int bfq_min_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1029 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
< bfq_stats_min_budgets
)
1030 return bfq_default_max_budget
/ 32;
1032 return bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
/ 32;
1036 * The next function, invoked after the input queue bfqq switches from
1037 * idle to busy, updates the budget of bfqq. The function also tells
1038 * whether the in-service queue should be expired, by returning
1039 * true. The purpose of expiring the in-service queue is to give bfqq
1040 * the chance to possibly preempt the in-service queue, and the reason
1041 * for preempting the in-service queue is to achieve one of the two
1044 * 1. Guarantee to bfqq its reserved bandwidth even if bfqq has
1045 * expired because it has remained idle. In particular, bfqq may have
1046 * expired for one of the following two reasons:
1048 * - BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS bfqq did not enjoy any device idling
1049 * and did not make it to issue a new request before its last
1050 * request was served;
1052 * - BFQQE_TOO_IDLE bfqq did enjoy device idling, but did not issue
1053 * a new request before the expiration of the idling-time.
1055 * Even if bfqq has expired for one of the above reasons, the process
1056 * associated with the queue may be however issuing requests greedily,
1057 * and thus be sensitive to the bandwidth it receives (bfqq may have
1058 * remained idle for other reasons: CPU high load, bfqq not enjoying
1059 * idling, I/O throttling somewhere in the path from the process to
1060 * the I/O scheduler, ...). But if, after every expiration for one of
1061 * the above two reasons, bfqq has to wait for the service of at least
1062 * one full budget of another queue before being served again, then
1063 * bfqq is likely to get a much lower bandwidth or resource time than
1064 * its reserved ones. To address this issue, two countermeasures need
1067 * First, the budget and the timestamps of bfqq need to be updated in
1068 * a special way on bfqq reactivation: they need to be updated as if
1069 * bfqq did not remain idle and did not expire. In fact, if they are
1070 * computed as if bfqq expired and remained idle until reactivation,
1071 * then the process associated with bfqq is treated as if, instead of
1072 * being greedy, it stopped issuing requests when bfqq remained idle,
1073 * and restarts issuing requests only on this reactivation. In other
1074 * words, the scheduler does not help the process recover the "service
1075 * hole" between bfqq expiration and reactivation. As a consequence,
1076 * the process receives a lower bandwidth than its reserved one. In
1077 * contrast, to recover this hole, the budget must be updated as if
1078 * bfqq was not expired at all before this reactivation, i.e., it must
1079 * be set to the value of the remaining budget when bfqq was
1080 * expired. Along the same line, timestamps need to be assigned the
1081 * value they had the last time bfqq was selected for service, i.e.,
1082 * before last expiration. Thus timestamps need to be back-shifted
1083 * with respect to their normal computation (see [1] for more details
1084 * on this tricky aspect).
1086 * Secondly, to allow the process to recover the hole, the in-service
1087 * queue must be expired too, to give bfqq the chance to preempt it
1088 * immediately. In fact, if bfqq has to wait for a full budget of the
1089 * in-service queue to be completed, then it may become impossible to
1090 * let the process recover the hole, even if the back-shifted
1091 * timestamps of bfqq are lower than those of the in-service queue. If
1092 * this happens for most or all of the holes, then the process may not
1093 * receive its reserved bandwidth. In this respect, it is worth noting
1094 * that, being the service of outstanding requests unpreemptible, a
1095 * little fraction of the holes may however be unrecoverable, thereby
1096 * causing a little loss of bandwidth.
1098 * The last important point is detecting whether bfqq does need this
1099 * bandwidth recovery. In this respect, the next function deems the
1100 * process associated with bfqq greedy, and thus allows it to recover
1101 * the hole, if: 1) the process is waiting for the arrival of a new
1102 * request (which implies that bfqq expired for one of the above two
1103 * reasons), and 2) such a request has arrived soon. The first
1104 * condition is controlled through the flag non_blocking_wait_rq,
1105 * while the second through the flag arrived_in_time. If both
1106 * conditions hold, then the function computes the budget in the
1107 * above-described special way, and signals that the in-service queue
1108 * should be expired. Timestamp back-shifting is done later in
1109 * __bfq_activate_entity.
1111 * 2. Reduce latency. Even if timestamps are not backshifted to let
1112 * the process associated with bfqq recover a service hole, bfqq may
1113 * however happen to have, after being (re)activated, a lower finish
1114 * timestamp than the in-service queue. That is, the next budget of
1115 * bfqq may have to be completed before the one of the in-service
1116 * queue. If this is the case, then preempting the in-service queue
1117 * allows this goal to be achieved, apart from the unpreemptible,
1118 * outstanding requests mentioned above.
1120 * Unfortunately, regardless of which of the above two goals one wants
1121 * to achieve, service trees need first to be updated to know whether
1122 * the in-service queue must be preempted. To have service trees
1123 * correctly updated, the in-service queue must be expired and
1124 * rescheduled, and bfqq must be scheduled too. This is one of the
1125 * most costly operations (in future versions, the scheduling
1126 * mechanism may be re-designed in such a way to make it possible to
1127 * know whether preemption is needed without needing to update service
1128 * trees). In addition, queue preemptions almost always cause random
1129 * I/O, and thus loss of throughput. Because of these facts, the next
1130 * function adopts the following simple scheme to avoid both costly
1131 * operations and too frequent preemptions: it requests the expiration
1132 * of the in-service queue (unconditionally) only for queues that need
1133 * to recover a hole, or that either are weight-raised or deserve to
1136 static bool bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1137 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1138 bool arrived_in_time
,
1139 bool wr_or_deserves_wr
)
1141 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
1143 if (bfq_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
) && arrived_in_time
) {
1145 * We do not clear the flag non_blocking_wait_rq here, as
1146 * the latter is used in bfq_activate_bfqq to signal
1147 * that timestamps need to be back-shifted (and is
1148 * cleared right after).
1152 * In next assignment we rely on that either
1153 * entity->service or entity->budget are not updated
1154 * on expiration if bfqq is empty (see
1155 * __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget). Thus both quantities
1156 * remain unchanged after such an expiration, and the
1157 * following statement therefore assigns to
1158 * entity->budget the remaining budget on such an
1159 * expiration. For clarity, entity->service is not
1160 * updated on expiration in any case, and, in normal
1161 * operation, is reset only when bfqq is selected for
1162 * service (see bfq_get_next_queue).
1164 entity
->budget
= min_t(unsigned long,
1165 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
),
1171 entity
->budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
1172 bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq
->next_rq
, bfqq
));
1173 bfq_clear_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
);
1174 return wr_or_deserves_wr
;
1177 static unsigned int bfq_wr_duration(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1181 if (bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
> 0)
1182 return bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
;
1184 dur
= bfqd
->RT_prod
;
1185 do_div(dur
, bfqd
->peak_rate
);
1188 * Limit duration between 3 and 13 seconds. Tests show that
1189 * higher values than 13 seconds often yield the opposite of
1190 * the desired result, i.e., worsen responsiveness by letting
1191 * non-interactive and non-soft-real-time applications
1192 * preserve weight raising for a too long time interval.
1194 * On the other end, lower values than 3 seconds make it
1195 * difficult for most interactive tasks to complete their jobs
1196 * before weight-raising finishes.
1198 if (dur
> msecs_to_jiffies(13000))
1199 dur
= msecs_to_jiffies(13000);
1200 else if (dur
< msecs_to_jiffies(3000))
1201 dur
= msecs_to_jiffies(3000);
1207 * Return the farthest future time instant according to jiffies
1210 static unsigned long bfq_greatest_from_now(void)
1212 return jiffies
+ MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET
;
1216 * Return the farthest past time instant according to jiffies
1219 static unsigned long bfq_smallest_from_now(void)
1221 return jiffies
- MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET
;
1224 static void bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1225 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1226 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
,
1227 bool wr_or_deserves_wr
,
1232 if (old_wr_coeff
== 1 && wr_or_deserves_wr
) {
1233 /* start a weight-raising period */
1235 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1236 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1239 * No interactive weight raising in progress
1240 * here: assign minus infinity to
1241 * wr_start_at_switch_to_srt, to make sure
1242 * that, at the end of the soft-real-time
1243 * weight raising periods that is starting
1244 * now, no interactive weight-raising period
1245 * may be wrongly considered as still in
1246 * progress (and thus actually started by
1249 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
=
1250 bfq_smallest_from_now();
1251 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
*
1252 BFQ_SOFTRT_WEIGHT_FACTOR
;
1253 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
=
1254 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
;
1258 * If needed, further reduce budget to make sure it is
1259 * close to bfqq's backlog, so as to reduce the
1260 * scheduling-error component due to a too large
1261 * budget. Do not care about throughput consequences,
1262 * but only about latency. Finally, do not assign a
1263 * too small budget either, to avoid increasing
1264 * latency by causing too frequent expirations.
1266 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= min_t(unsigned long,
1267 bfqq
->entity
.budget
,
1268 2 * bfq_min_budget(bfqd
));
1269 } else if (old_wr_coeff
> 1) {
1270 if (interactive
) { /* update wr coeff and duration */
1271 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1272 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1273 } else if (in_burst
)
1277 * The application is now or still meeting the
1278 * requirements for being deemed soft rt. We
1279 * can then correctly and safely (re)charge
1280 * the weight-raising duration for the
1281 * application with the weight-raising
1282 * duration for soft rt applications.
1284 * In particular, doing this recharge now, i.e.,
1285 * before the weight-raising period for the
1286 * application finishes, reduces the probability
1287 * of the following negative scenario:
1288 * 1) the weight of a soft rt application is
1289 * raised at startup (as for any newly
1290 * created application),
1291 * 2) since the application is not interactive,
1292 * at a certain time weight-raising is
1293 * stopped for the application,
1294 * 3) at that time the application happens to
1295 * still have pending requests, and hence
1296 * is destined to not have a chance to be
1297 * deemed soft rt before these requests are
1298 * completed (see the comments to the
1299 * function bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()
1300 * for details on soft rt detection),
1301 * 4) these pending requests experience a high
1302 * latency because the application is not
1303 * weight-raised while they are pending.
1305 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
!=
1306 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
) {
1307 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
=
1308 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
1310 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
=
1311 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
;
1312 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
*
1313 BFQ_SOFTRT_WEIGHT_FACTOR
;
1315 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1320 static bool bfq_bfqq_idle_for_long_time(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1321 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1323 return bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 &&
1324 time_is_before_jiffies(
1325 bfqq
->budget_timeout
+
1326 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
);
1329 static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1330 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1335 bool soft_rt
, in_burst
, wr_or_deserves_wr
,
1336 bfqq_wants_to_preempt
,
1337 idle_for_long_time
= bfq_bfqq_idle_for_long_time(bfqd
, bfqq
),
1339 * See the comments on
1340 * bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation for
1341 * details on the usage of the next variable.
1343 arrived_in_time
= ktime_get_ns() <=
1344 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
+
1345 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
* 3;
1347 bfqg_stats_update_io_add(bfqq_group(RQ_BFQQ(rq
)), bfqq
, rq
->cmd_flags
);
1350 * bfqq deserves to be weight-raised if:
1352 * - it does not belong to a large burst,
1353 * - it has been idle for enough time or is soft real-time,
1354 * - is linked to a bfq_io_cq (it is not shared in any sense).
1356 in_burst
= bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
1357 soft_rt
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
> 0 &&
1359 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
);
1360 *interactive
= !in_burst
&& idle_for_long_time
;
1361 wr_or_deserves_wr
= bfqd
->low_latency
&&
1362 (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 ||
1363 (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) &&
1364 bfqq
->bic
&& (*interactive
|| soft_rt
)));
1367 * Using the last flag, update budget and check whether bfqq
1368 * may want to preempt the in-service queue.
1370 bfqq_wants_to_preempt
=
1371 bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation(bfqd
, bfqq
,
1376 * If bfqq happened to be activated in a burst, but has been
1377 * idle for much more than an interactive queue, then we
1378 * assume that, in the overall I/O initiated in the burst, the
1379 * I/O associated with bfqq is finished. So bfqq does not need
1380 * to be treated as a queue belonging to a burst
1381 * anymore. Accordingly, we reset bfqq's in_large_burst flag
1382 * if set, and remove bfqq from the burst list if it's
1383 * there. We do not decrement burst_size, because the fact
1384 * that bfqq does not need to belong to the burst list any
1385 * more does not invalidate the fact that bfqq was created in
1388 if (likely(!bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
)) &&
1389 idle_for_long_time
&&
1390 time_is_before_jiffies(
1391 bfqq
->budget_timeout
+
1392 msecs_to_jiffies(10000))) {
1393 hlist_del_init(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
1394 bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
1397 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
1400 if (!bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
)) {
1401 if (arrived_in_time
) {
1402 bfqq
->requests_within_timer
++;
1403 if (bfqq
->requests_within_timer
>=
1404 bfqd
->bfq_requests_within_timer
)
1405 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
1407 bfqq
->requests_within_timer
= 0;
1410 if (bfqd
->low_latency
) {
1411 if (unlikely(time_is_after_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
)))
1414 jiffies
- bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
- 1;
1416 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
1417 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
)) {
1418 bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival(bfqd
, bfqq
,
1425 if (old_wr_coeff
!= bfqq
->wr_coeff
)
1426 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1430 bfqq
->last_idle_bklogged
= jiffies
;
1431 bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
= 0;
1432 bfq_clear_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
);
1434 bfq_add_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1437 * Expire in-service queue only if preemption may be needed
1438 * for guarantees. In this respect, the function
1439 * next_queue_may_preempt just checks a simple, necessary
1440 * condition, and not a sufficient condition based on
1441 * timestamps. In fact, for the latter condition to be
1442 * evaluated, timestamps would need first to be updated, and
1443 * this operation is quite costly (see the comments on the
1444 * function bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation).
1446 if (bfqd
->in_service_queue
&& bfqq_wants_to_preempt
&&
1447 bfqd
->in_service_queue
->wr_coeff
< bfqq
->wr_coeff
&&
1448 next_queue_may_preempt(bfqd
))
1449 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqd
->in_service_queue
,
1450 false, BFQQE_PREEMPTED
);
1453 static void bfq_add_request(struct request
*rq
)
1455 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
1456 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1457 struct request
*next_rq
, *prev
;
1458 unsigned int old_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
1459 bool interactive
= false;
1461 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "add_request %d", rq_is_sync(rq
));
1462 bfqq
->queued
[rq_is_sync(rq
)]++;
1465 elv_rb_add(&bfqq
->sort_list
, rq
);
1468 * Check if this request is a better next-serve candidate.
1470 prev
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
1471 next_rq
= bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, bfqq
->next_rq
, rq
, bfqd
->last_position
);
1472 bfqq
->next_rq
= next_rq
;
1475 * Adjust priority tree position, if next_rq changes.
1477 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
)
1478 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1480 if (!bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
)) /* switching to busy ... */
1481 bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(bfqd
, bfqq
, old_wr_coeff
,
1484 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& old_wr_coeff
== 1 && !rq_is_sync(rq
) &&
1485 time_is_before_jiffies(
1486 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
1487 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_inter_arr_async
)) {
1488 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
1489 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
1491 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
1492 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1494 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
)
1495 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1499 * Assign jiffies to last_wr_start_finish in the following
1502 * . if bfqq is not going to be weight-raised, because, for
1503 * non weight-raised queues, last_wr_start_finish stores the
1504 * arrival time of the last request; as of now, this piece
1505 * of information is used only for deciding whether to
1506 * weight-raise async queues
1508 * . if bfqq is not weight-raised, because, if bfqq is now
1509 * switching to weight-raised, then last_wr_start_finish
1510 * stores the time when weight-raising starts
1512 * . if bfqq is interactive, because, regardless of whether
1513 * bfqq is currently weight-raised, the weight-raising
1514 * period must start or restart (this case is considered
1515 * separately because it is not detected by the above
1516 * conditions, if bfqq is already weight-raised)
1518 * last_wr_start_finish has to be updated also if bfqq is soft
1519 * real-time, because the weight-raising period is constantly
1520 * restarted on idle-to-busy transitions for these queues, but
1521 * this is already done in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch if
1524 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&&
1525 (old_wr_coeff
== 1 || bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 || interactive
))
1526 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1529 static struct request
*bfq_find_rq_fmerge(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1531 struct request_queue
*q
)
1533 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->bio_bfqq
;
1537 return elv_rb_find(&bfqq
->sort_list
, bio_end_sector(bio
));
1542 static sector_t
get_sdist(sector_t last_pos
, struct request
*rq
)
1545 return abs(blk_rq_pos(rq
) - last_pos
);
1550 #if 0 /* Still not clear if we can do without next two functions */
1551 static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
1553 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1555 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
++;
1558 static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
1560 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1562 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
--;
1566 static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue
*q
,
1569 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
1570 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1571 const int sync
= rq_is_sync(rq
);
1573 if (bfqq
->next_rq
== rq
) {
1574 bfqq
->next_rq
= bfq_find_next_rq(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
1575 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1578 if (rq
->queuelist
.prev
!= &rq
->queuelist
)
1579 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
1580 bfqq
->queued
[sync
]--;
1582 elv_rb_del(&bfqq
->sort_list
, rq
);
1584 elv_rqhash_del(q
, rq
);
1585 if (q
->last_merge
== rq
)
1586 q
->last_merge
= NULL
;
1588 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
1589 bfqq
->next_rq
= NULL
;
1591 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
) && bfqq
!= bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
1592 bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
, false);
1594 * bfqq emptied. In normal operation, when
1595 * bfqq is empty, bfqq->entity.service and
1596 * bfqq->entity.budget must contain,
1597 * respectively, the service received and the
1598 * budget used last time bfqq emptied. These
1599 * facts do not hold in this case, as at least
1600 * this last removal occurred while bfqq is
1601 * not in service. To avoid inconsistencies,
1602 * reset both bfqq->entity.service and
1603 * bfqq->entity.budget, if bfqq has still a
1604 * process that may issue I/O requests to it.
1606 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= bfqq
->entity
.service
= 0;
1610 * Remove queue from request-position tree as it is empty.
1612 if (bfqq
->pos_root
) {
1613 rb_erase(&bfqq
->pos_node
, bfqq
->pos_root
);
1614 bfqq
->pos_root
= NULL
;
1618 if (rq
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
)
1619 bfqq
->meta_pending
--;
1621 bfqg_stats_update_io_remove(bfqq_group(bfqq
), rq
->cmd_flags
);
1624 static bool bfq_bio_merge(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
, struct bio
*bio
)
1626 struct request_queue
*q
= hctx
->queue
;
1627 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1628 struct request
*free
= NULL
;
1630 * bfq_bic_lookup grabs the queue_lock: invoke it now and
1631 * store its return value for later use, to avoid nesting
1632 * queue_lock inside the bfqd->lock. We assume that the bic
1633 * returned by bfq_bic_lookup does not go away before
1634 * bfqd->lock is taken.
1636 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= bfq_bic_lookup(bfqd
, current
->io_context
, q
);
1639 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1642 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, op_is_sync(bio
->bi_opf
));
1644 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= NULL
;
1645 bfqd
->bio_bic
= bic
;
1647 ret
= blk_mq_sched_try_merge(q
, bio
, &free
);
1650 blk_mq_free_request(free
);
1651 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1656 static int bfq_request_merge(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
**req
,
1659 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
1660 struct request
*__rq
;
1662 __rq
= bfq_find_rq_fmerge(bfqd
, bio
, q
);
1663 if (__rq
&& elv_bio_merge_ok(__rq
, bio
)) {
1665 return ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE
;
1668 return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE
;
1671 static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*req
,
1672 enum elv_merge type
)
1674 if (type
== ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE
&&
1675 rb_prev(&req
->rb_node
) &&
1677 blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req
->rb_node
),
1678 struct request
, rb_node
))) {
1679 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(req
);
1680 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
1681 struct request
*prev
, *next_rq
;
1683 /* Reposition request in its sort_list */
1684 elv_rb_del(&bfqq
->sort_list
, req
);
1685 elv_rb_add(&bfqq
->sort_list
, req
);
1687 /* Choose next request to be served for bfqq */
1688 prev
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
1689 next_rq
= bfq_choose_req(bfqd
, bfqq
->next_rq
, req
,
1690 bfqd
->last_position
);
1691 bfqq
->next_rq
= next_rq
;
1693 * If next_rq changes, update both the queue's budget to
1694 * fit the new request and the queue's position in its
1697 if (prev
!= bfqq
->next_rq
) {
1698 bfq_updated_next_req(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1699 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
1704 static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
,
1705 struct request
*next
)
1707 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
), *next_bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(next
);
1709 if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&rq
->rb_node
))
1713 * If next and rq belong to the same bfq_queue and next is older
1714 * than rq, then reposition rq in the fifo (by substituting next
1715 * with rq). Otherwise, if next and rq belong to different
1716 * bfq_queues, never reposition rq: in fact, we would have to
1717 * reposition it with respect to next's position in its own fifo,
1718 * which would most certainly be too expensive with respect to
1721 if (bfqq
== next_bfqq
&&
1722 !list_empty(&rq
->queuelist
) && !list_empty(&next
->queuelist
) &&
1723 next
->fifo_time
< rq
->fifo_time
) {
1724 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
1725 list_replace_init(&next
->queuelist
, &rq
->queuelist
);
1726 rq
->fifo_time
= next
->fifo_time
;
1729 if (bfqq
->next_rq
== next
)
1732 bfq_remove_request(q
, next
);
1735 bfqg_stats_update_io_merged(bfqq_group(bfqq
), next
->cmd_flags
);
1738 /* Must be called with bfqq != NULL */
1739 static void bfq_bfqq_end_wr(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1741 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
))
1742 bfqq
->bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
1744 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= 0;
1745 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
1747 * Trigger a weight change on the next invocation of
1748 * __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio.
1750 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
1753 void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1754 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
)
1758 for (i
= 0; i
< 2; i
++)
1759 for (j
= 0; j
< IOPRIO_BE_NR
; j
++)
1760 if (bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
])
1761 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
]);
1762 if (bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
)
1763 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
);
1766 static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
1768 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
1770 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1772 list_for_each_entry(bfqq
, &bfqd
->active_list
, bfqq_list
)
1773 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
1774 list_for_each_entry(bfqq
, &bfqd
->idle_list
, bfqq_list
)
1775 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
1776 bfq_end_wr_async(bfqd
);
1778 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
1781 static sector_t
bfq_io_struct_pos(void *io_struct
, bool request
)
1784 return blk_rq_pos(io_struct
);
1786 return ((struct bio
*)io_struct
)->bi_iter
.bi_sector
;
1789 static int bfq_rq_close_to_sector(void *io_struct
, bool request
,
1792 return abs(bfq_io_struct_pos(io_struct
, request
) - sector
) <=
1796 static struct bfq_queue
*bfqq_find_close(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1797 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1800 struct rb_root
*root
= &bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(bfqq
)->rq_pos_tree
;
1801 struct rb_node
*parent
, *node
;
1802 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
1804 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root
))
1808 * First, if we find a request starting at the end of the last
1809 * request, choose it.
1811 __bfqq
= bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(bfqd
, root
, sector
, &parent
, NULL
);
1816 * If the exact sector wasn't found, the parent of the NULL leaf
1817 * will contain the closest sector (rq_pos_tree sorted by
1818 * next_request position).
1820 __bfqq
= rb_entry(parent
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
1821 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(__bfqq
->next_rq
, true, sector
))
1824 if (blk_rq_pos(__bfqq
->next_rq
) < sector
)
1825 node
= rb_next(&__bfqq
->pos_node
);
1827 node
= rb_prev(&__bfqq
->pos_node
);
1831 __bfqq
= rb_entry(node
, struct bfq_queue
, pos_node
);
1832 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(__bfqq
->next_rq
, true, sector
))
1838 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_find_close_cooperator(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
1839 struct bfq_queue
*cur_bfqq
,
1842 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
1845 * We shall notice if some of the queues are cooperating,
1846 * e.g., working closely on the same area of the device. In
1847 * that case, we can group them together and: 1) don't waste
1848 * time idling, and 2) serve the union of their requests in
1849 * the best possible order for throughput.
1851 bfqq
= bfqq_find_close(bfqd
, cur_bfqq
, sector
);
1852 if (!bfqq
|| bfqq
== cur_bfqq
)
1858 static struct bfq_queue
*
1859 bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
1861 int process_refs
, new_process_refs
;
1862 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
;
1865 * If there are no process references on the new_bfqq, then it is
1866 * unsafe to follow the ->new_bfqq chain as other bfqq's in the chain
1867 * may have dropped their last reference (not just their last process
1870 if (!bfqq_process_refs(new_bfqq
))
1873 /* Avoid a circular list and skip interim queue merges. */
1874 while ((__bfqq
= new_bfqq
->new_bfqq
)) {
1880 process_refs
= bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
);
1881 new_process_refs
= bfqq_process_refs(new_bfqq
);
1883 * If the process for the bfqq has gone away, there is no
1884 * sense in merging the queues.
1886 if (process_refs
== 0 || new_process_refs
== 0)
1889 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "scheduling merge with queue %d",
1893 * Merging is just a redirection: the requests of the process
1894 * owning one of the two queues are redirected to the other queue.
1895 * The latter queue, in its turn, is set as shared if this is the
1896 * first time that the requests of some process are redirected to
1899 * We redirect bfqq to new_bfqq and not the opposite, because
1900 * we are in the context of the process owning bfqq, thus we
1901 * have the io_cq of this process. So we can immediately
1902 * configure this io_cq to redirect the requests of the
1903 * process to new_bfqq. In contrast, the io_cq of new_bfqq is
1904 * not available any more (new_bfqq->bic == NULL).
1906 * Anyway, even in case new_bfqq coincides with the in-service
1907 * queue, redirecting requests the in-service queue is the
1908 * best option, as we feed the in-service queue with new
1909 * requests close to the last request served and, by doing so,
1910 * are likely to increase the throughput.
1912 bfqq
->new_bfqq
= new_bfqq
;
1913 new_bfqq
->ref
+= process_refs
;
1917 static bool bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1918 struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
1920 if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq
) || bfq_class_idle(new_bfqq
) ||
1921 (bfqq
->ioprio_class
!= new_bfqq
->ioprio_class
))
1925 * If either of the queues has already been detected as seeky,
1926 * then merging it with the other queue is unlikely to lead to
1929 if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) || BFQQ_SEEKY(new_bfqq
))
1933 * Interleaved I/O is known to be done by (some) applications
1934 * only for reads, so it does not make sense to merge async
1937 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || !bfq_bfqq_sync(new_bfqq
))
1944 * If this function returns true, then bfqq cannot be merged. The idea
1945 * is that true cooperation happens very early after processes start
1946 * to do I/O. Usually, late cooperations are just accidental false
1947 * positives. In case bfqq is weight-raised, such false positives
1948 * would evidently degrade latency guarantees for bfqq.
1950 static bool wr_from_too_long(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
1952 return bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 &&
1953 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
1954 msecs_to_jiffies(100));
1958 * Attempt to schedule a merge of bfqq with the currently in-service
1959 * queue or with a close queue among the scheduled queues. Return
1960 * NULL if no merge was scheduled, a pointer to the shared bfq_queue
1961 * structure otherwise.
1963 * The OOM queue is not allowed to participate to cooperation: in fact, since
1964 * the requests temporarily redirected to the OOM queue could be redirected
1965 * again to dedicated queues at any time, the state needed to correctly
1966 * handle merging with the OOM queue would be quite complex and expensive
1967 * to maintain. Besides, in such a critical condition as an out of memory,
1968 * the benefits of queue merging may be little relevant, or even negligible.
1970 * Weight-raised queues can be merged only if their weight-raising
1971 * period has just started. In fact cooperating processes are usually
1972 * started together. Thus, with this filter we avoid false positives
1973 * that would jeopardize low-latency guarantees.
1975 * WARNING: queue merging may impair fairness among non-weight raised
1976 * queues, for at least two reasons: 1) the original weight of a
1977 * merged queue may change during the merged state, 2) even being the
1978 * weight the same, a merged queue may be bloated with many more
1979 * requests than the ones produced by its originally-associated
1982 static struct bfq_queue
*
1983 bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
1984 void *io_struct
, bool request
)
1986 struct bfq_queue
*in_service_bfqq
, *new_bfqq
;
1989 return bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
1992 wr_from_too_long(bfqq
) ||
1993 unlikely(bfqq
== &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
1996 /* If there is only one backlogged queue, don't search. */
1997 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
== 1)
2000 in_service_bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
2002 if (!in_service_bfqq
|| in_service_bfqq
== bfqq
2003 || wr_from_too_long(in_service_bfqq
) ||
2004 unlikely(in_service_bfqq
== &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
2005 goto check_scheduled
;
2007 if (bfq_rq_close_to_sector(io_struct
, request
, bfqd
->last_position
) &&
2008 bfqq
->entity
.parent
== in_service_bfqq
->entity
.parent
&&
2009 bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(bfqq
, in_service_bfqq
)) {
2010 new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_merge(bfqq
, in_service_bfqq
);
2015 * Check whether there is a cooperator among currently scheduled
2016 * queues. The only thing we need is that the bio/request is not
2017 * NULL, as we need it to establish whether a cooperator exists.
2020 new_bfqq
= bfq_find_close_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
,
2021 bfq_io_struct_pos(io_struct
, request
));
2023 if (new_bfqq
&& !wr_from_too_long(new_bfqq
) &&
2024 likely(new_bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
) &&
2025 bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(bfqq
, new_bfqq
))
2026 return bfq_setup_merge(bfqq
, new_bfqq
);
2031 static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2033 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= bfqq
->bic
;
2036 * If !bfqq->bic, the queue is already shared or its requests
2037 * have already been redirected to a shared queue; both idle window
2038 * and weight raising state have already been saved. Do nothing.
2043 bic
->saved_ttime
= bfqq
->ttime
;
2044 bic
->saved_has_short_ttime
= bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
2045 bic
->saved_IO_bound
= bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
2046 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
= bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
2047 bic
->was_in_burst_list
= !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
2048 bic
->saved_wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
2049 bic
->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
2050 bic
->saved_last_wr_start_finish
= bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
2051 bic
->saved_wr_cur_max_time
= bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
;
2055 bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
,
2056 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_queue
*new_bfqq
)
2058 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "merging with queue %lu",
2059 (unsigned long)new_bfqq
->pid
);
2060 /* Save weight raising and idle window of the merged queues */
2061 bfq_bfqq_save_state(bfqq
);
2062 bfq_bfqq_save_state(new_bfqq
);
2063 if (bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
))
2064 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(new_bfqq
);
2065 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
2068 * If bfqq is weight-raised, then let new_bfqq inherit
2069 * weight-raising. To reduce false positives, neglect the case
2070 * where bfqq has just been created, but has not yet made it
2071 * to be weight-raised (which may happen because EQM may merge
2072 * bfqq even before bfq_add_request is executed for the first
2073 * time for bfqq). Handling this case would however be very
2074 * easy, thanks to the flag just_created.
2076 if (new_bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 && bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) {
2077 new_bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
;
2078 new_bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
;
2079 new_bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
;
2080 new_bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
=
2081 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
2082 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(new_bfqq
))
2083 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
++;
2084 new_bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
2087 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) { /* bfqq has given its wr to new_bfqq */
2089 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
2090 if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
))
2091 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
--;
2094 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, new_bfqq
, "merge_bfqqs: wr_busy %d",
2095 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
);
2098 * Merge queues (that is, let bic redirect its requests to new_bfqq)
2100 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, new_bfqq
, 1);
2101 bfq_mark_bfqq_coop(new_bfqq
);
2103 * new_bfqq now belongs to at least two bics (it is a shared queue):
2104 * set new_bfqq->bic to NULL. bfqq either:
2105 * - does not belong to any bic any more, and hence bfqq->bic must
2106 * be set to NULL, or
2107 * - is a queue whose owning bics have already been redirected to a
2108 * different queue, hence the queue is destined to not belong to
2109 * any bic soon and bfqq->bic is already NULL (therefore the next
2110 * assignment causes no harm).
2112 new_bfqq
->bic
= NULL
;
2114 /* release process reference to bfqq */
2115 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
2118 static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
,
2121 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
2122 bool is_sync
= op_is_sync(bio
->bi_opf
);
2123 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->bio_bfqq
, *new_bfqq
;
2126 * Disallow merge of a sync bio into an async request.
2128 if (is_sync
&& !rq_is_sync(rq
))
2132 * Lookup the bfqq that this bio will be queued with. Allow
2133 * merge only if rq is queued there.
2139 * We take advantage of this function to perform an early merge
2140 * of the queues of possible cooperating processes.
2142 new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
, bio
, false);
2145 * bic still points to bfqq, then it has not yet been
2146 * redirected to some other bfq_queue, and a queue
2147 * merge beween bfqq and new_bfqq can be safely
2148 * fulfillled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq
2149 * and bfqq can be put.
2151 bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd
, bfqd
->bio_bic
, bfqq
,
2154 * If we get here, bio will be queued into new_queue,
2155 * so use new_bfqq to decide whether bio and rq can be
2161 * Change also bqfd->bio_bfqq, as
2162 * bfqd->bio_bic now points to new_bfqq, and
2163 * this function may be invoked again (and then may
2164 * use again bqfd->bio_bfqq).
2166 bfqd
->bio_bfqq
= bfqq
;
2169 return bfqq
== RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
2173 * Set the maximum time for the in-service queue to consume its
2174 * budget. This prevents seeky processes from lowering the throughput.
2175 * In practice, a time-slice service scheme is used with seeky
2178 static void bfq_set_budget_timeout(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2179 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2181 unsigned int timeout_coeff
;
2183 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
== bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
)
2186 timeout_coeff
= bfqq
->entity
.weight
/ bfqq
->entity
.orig_weight
;
2188 bfqd
->last_budget_start
= ktime_get();
2190 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
+
2191 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
* timeout_coeff
;
2194 static void __bfq_set_in_service_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2195 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2198 bfqg_stats_update_avg_queue_size(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
2199 bfq_clear_bfqq_fifo_expire(bfqq
);
2201 bfqd
->budgets_assigned
= (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
* 7 + 256) / 8;
2203 if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
) &&
2204 bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 &&
2205 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
== bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
&&
2206 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->budget_timeout
)) {
2208 * For soft real-time queues, move the start
2209 * of the weight-raising period forward by the
2210 * time the queue has not received any
2211 * service. Otherwise, a relatively long
2212 * service delay is likely to cause the
2213 * weight-raising period of the queue to end,
2214 * because of the short duration of the
2215 * weight-raising period of a soft real-time
2216 * queue. It is worth noting that this move
2217 * is not so dangerous for the other queues,
2218 * because soft real-time queues are not
2221 * To not add a further variable, we use the
2222 * overloaded field budget_timeout to
2223 * determine for how long the queue has not
2224 * received service, i.e., how much time has
2225 * elapsed since the queue expired. However,
2226 * this is a little imprecise, because
2227 * budget_timeout is set to jiffies if bfqq
2228 * not only expires, but also remains with no
2231 if (time_after(bfqq
->budget_timeout
,
2232 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
))
2233 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+=
2234 jiffies
- bfqq
->budget_timeout
;
2236 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
2239 bfq_set_budget_timeout(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2240 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
2241 "set_in_service_queue, cur-budget = %d",
2242 bfqq
->entity
.budget
);
2245 bfqd
->in_service_queue
= bfqq
;
2249 * Get and set a new queue for service.
2251 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_set_in_service_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2253 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfq_get_next_queue(bfqd
);
2255 __bfq_set_in_service_queue(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2259 static void bfq_arm_slice_timer(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2261 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
2264 bfq_mark_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
2267 * We don't want to idle for seeks, but we do want to allow
2268 * fair distribution of slice time for a process doing back-to-back
2269 * seeks. So allow a little bit of time for him to submit a new rq.
2271 sl
= bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
;
2273 * Unless the queue is being weight-raised or the scenario is
2274 * asymmetric, grant only minimum idle time if the queue
2275 * is seeky. A long idling is preserved for a weight-raised
2276 * queue, or, more in general, in an asymmetric scenario,
2277 * because a long idling is needed for guaranteeing to a queue
2278 * its reserved share of the throughput (in particular, it is
2279 * needed if the queue has a higher weight than some other
2282 if (BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 &&
2283 bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd
))
2284 sl
= min_t(u64
, sl
, BFQ_MIN_TT
);
2286 bfqd
->last_idling_start
= ktime_get();
2287 hrtimer_start(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
, ns_to_ktime(sl
),
2289 bfqg_stats_set_start_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
2293 * In autotuning mode, max_budget is dynamically recomputed as the
2294 * amount of sectors transferred in timeout at the estimated peak
2295 * rate. This enables BFQ to utilize a full timeslice with a full
2296 * budget, even if the in-service queue is served at peak rate. And
2297 * this maximises throughput with sequential workloads.
2299 static unsigned long bfq_calc_max_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2301 return (u64
)bfqd
->peak_rate
* USEC_PER_MSEC
*
2302 jiffies_to_msecs(bfqd
->bfq_timeout
)>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
;
2306 * Update parameters related to throughput and responsiveness, as a
2307 * function of the estimated peak rate. See comments on
2308 * bfq_calc_max_budget(), and on T_slow and T_fast arrays.
2310 static void update_thr_responsiveness_params(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
2312 int dev_type
= blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
);
2314 if (bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
== 0)
2315 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
=
2316 bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
2318 if (bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
&&
2319 bfqd
->peak_rate
< device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
]) {
2320 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_SLOW
;
2321 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_slow
[dev_type
] *
2323 } else if (bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_SLOW
&&
2324 bfqd
->peak_rate
> device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
]) {
2325 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_FAST
;
2326 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_fast
[dev_type
] *
2331 "dev_type %s dev_speed_class = %s (%llu sects/sec), thresh %llu setcs/sec",
2332 dev_type
== 0 ? "ROT" : "NONROT",
2333 bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
? "FAST" : "SLOW",
2334 bfqd
->device_speed
== BFQ_BFQD_FAST
?
2335 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)R_fast
[dev_type
])>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
:
2336 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)R_slow
[dev_type
])>>BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
,
2337 (USEC_PER_SEC
*(u64
)device_speed_thresh
[dev_type
])>>
2341 static void bfq_reset_rate_computation(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2344 if (rq
!= NULL
) { /* new rq dispatch now, reset accordingly */
2345 bfqd
->last_dispatch
= bfqd
->first_dispatch
= ktime_get_ns();
2346 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
= 1;
2347 bfqd
->sequential_samples
= 0;
2348 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
= bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
=
2350 } else /* no new rq dispatched, just reset the number of samples */
2351 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
= 0; /* full re-init on next disp. */
2354 "reset_rate_computation at end, sample %u/%u tot_sects %llu",
2355 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
, bfqd
->sequential_samples
,
2356 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
);
2359 static void bfq_update_rate_reset(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
2361 u32 rate
, weight
, divisor
;
2364 * For the convergence property to hold (see comments on
2365 * bfq_update_peak_rate()) and for the assessment to be
2366 * reliable, a minimum number of samples must be present, and
2367 * a minimum amount of time must have elapsed. If not so, do
2368 * not compute new rate. Just reset parameters, to get ready
2369 * for a new evaluation attempt.
2371 if (bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
< BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES
||
2372 bfqd
->delta_from_first
< BFQ_RATE_MIN_INTERVAL
)
2373 goto reset_computation
;
2376 * If a new request completion has occurred after last
2377 * dispatch, then, to approximate the rate at which requests
2378 * have been served by the device, it is more precise to
2379 * extend the observation interval to the last completion.
2381 bfqd
->delta_from_first
=
2382 max_t(u64
, bfqd
->delta_from_first
,
2383 bfqd
->last_completion
- bfqd
->first_dispatch
);
2386 * Rate computed in sects/usec, and not sects/nsec, for
2389 rate
= div64_ul(bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
,
2390 div_u64(bfqd
->delta_from_first
, NSEC_PER_USEC
));
2393 * Peak rate not updated if:
2394 * - the percentage of sequential dispatches is below 3/4 of the
2395 * total, and rate is below the current estimated peak rate
2396 * - rate is unreasonably high (> 20M sectors/sec)
2398 if ((bfqd
->sequential_samples
< (3 * bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
)>>2 &&
2399 rate
<= bfqd
->peak_rate
) ||
2400 rate
> 20<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
)
2401 goto reset_computation
;
2404 * We have to update the peak rate, at last! To this purpose,
2405 * we use a low-pass filter. We compute the smoothing constant
2406 * of the filter as a function of the 'weight' of the new
2409 * As can be seen in next formulas, we define this weight as a
2410 * quantity proportional to how sequential the workload is,
2411 * and to how long the observation time interval is.
2413 * The weight runs from 0 to 8. The maximum value of the
2414 * weight, 8, yields the minimum value for the smoothing
2415 * constant. At this minimum value for the smoothing constant,
2416 * the measured rate contributes for half of the next value of
2417 * the estimated peak rate.
2419 * So, the first step is to compute the weight as a function
2420 * of how sequential the workload is. Note that the weight
2421 * cannot reach 9, because bfqd->sequential_samples cannot
2422 * become equal to bfqd->peak_rate_samples, which, in its
2423 * turn, holds true because bfqd->sequential_samples is not
2424 * incremented for the first sample.
2426 weight
= (9 * bfqd
->sequential_samples
) / bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
;
2429 * Second step: further refine the weight as a function of the
2430 * duration of the observation interval.
2432 weight
= min_t(u32
, 8,
2433 div_u64(weight
* bfqd
->delta_from_first
,
2434 BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL
));
2437 * Divisor ranging from 10, for minimum weight, to 2, for
2440 divisor
= 10 - weight
;
2443 * Finally, update peak rate:
2445 * peak_rate = peak_rate * (divisor-1) / divisor + rate / divisor
2447 bfqd
->peak_rate
*= divisor
-1;
2448 bfqd
->peak_rate
/= divisor
;
2449 rate
/= divisor
; /* smoothing constant alpha = 1/divisor */
2451 bfqd
->peak_rate
+= rate
;
2452 update_thr_responsiveness_params(bfqd
);
2455 bfq_reset_rate_computation(bfqd
, rq
);
2459 * Update the read/write peak rate (the main quantity used for
2460 * auto-tuning, see update_thr_responsiveness_params()).
2462 * It is not trivial to estimate the peak rate (correctly): because of
2463 * the presence of sw and hw queues between the scheduler and the
2464 * device components that finally serve I/O requests, it is hard to
2465 * say exactly when a given dispatched request is served inside the
2466 * device, and for how long. As a consequence, it is hard to know
2467 * precisely at what rate a given set of requests is actually served
2470 * On the opposite end, the dispatch time of any request is trivially
2471 * available, and, from this piece of information, the "dispatch rate"
2472 * of requests can be immediately computed. So, the idea in the next
2473 * function is to use what is known, namely request dispatch times
2474 * (plus, when useful, request completion times), to estimate what is
2475 * unknown, namely in-device request service rate.
2477 * The main issue is that, because of the above facts, the rate at
2478 * which a certain set of requests is dispatched over a certain time
2479 * interval can vary greatly with respect to the rate at which the
2480 * same requests are then served. But, since the size of any
2481 * intermediate queue is limited, and the service scheme is lossless
2482 * (no request is silently dropped), the following obvious convergence
2483 * property holds: the number of requests dispatched MUST become
2484 * closer and closer to the number of requests completed as the
2485 * observation interval grows. This is the key property used in
2486 * the next function to estimate the peak service rate as a function
2487 * of the observed dispatch rate. The function assumes to be invoked
2488 * on every request dispatch.
2490 static void bfq_update_peak_rate(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
2492 u64 now_ns
= ktime_get_ns();
2494 if (bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
== 0) { /* first dispatch */
2495 bfq_log(bfqd
, "update_peak_rate: goto reset, samples %d",
2496 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
);
2497 bfq_reset_rate_computation(bfqd
, rq
);
2498 goto update_last_values
; /* will add one sample */
2502 * Device idle for very long: the observation interval lasting
2503 * up to this dispatch cannot be a valid observation interval
2504 * for computing a new peak rate (similarly to the late-
2505 * completion event in bfq_completed_request()). Go to
2506 * update_rate_and_reset to have the following three steps
2508 * - close the observation interval at the last (previous)
2509 * request dispatch or completion
2510 * - compute rate, if possible, for that observation interval
2511 * - start a new observation interval with this dispatch
2513 if (now_ns
- bfqd
->last_dispatch
> 100*NSEC_PER_MSEC
&&
2514 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
== 0)
2515 goto update_rate_and_reset
;
2517 /* Update sampling information */
2518 bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
++;
2520 if ((bfqd
->rq_in_driver
> 0 ||
2521 now_ns
- bfqd
->last_completion
< BFQ_MIN_TT
)
2522 && get_sdist(bfqd
->last_position
, rq
) < BFQQ_SEEK_THR
)
2523 bfqd
->sequential_samples
++;
2525 bfqd
->tot_sectors_dispatched
+= blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2527 /* Reset max observed rq size every 32 dispatches */
2528 if (likely(bfqd
->peak_rate_samples
% 32))
2529 bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
=
2530 max_t(u32
, blk_rq_sectors(rq
), bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
);
2532 bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
= blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2534 bfqd
->delta_from_first
= now_ns
- bfqd
->first_dispatch
;
2536 /* Target observation interval not yet reached, go on sampling */
2537 if (bfqd
->delta_from_first
< BFQ_RATE_REF_INTERVAL
)
2538 goto update_last_values
;
2540 update_rate_and_reset
:
2541 bfq_update_rate_reset(bfqd
, rq
);
2543 bfqd
->last_position
= blk_rq_pos(rq
) + blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
2544 bfqd
->last_dispatch
= now_ns
;
2548 * Remove request from internal lists.
2550 static void bfq_dispatch_remove(struct request_queue
*q
, struct request
*rq
)
2552 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
);
2555 * For consistency, the next instruction should have been
2556 * executed after removing the request from the queue and
2557 * dispatching it. We execute instead this instruction before
2558 * bfq_remove_request() (and hence introduce a temporary
2559 * inconsistency), for efficiency. In fact, should this
2560 * dispatch occur for a non in-service bfqq, this anticipated
2561 * increment prevents two counters related to bfqq->dispatched
2562 * from risking to be, first, uselessly decremented, and then
2563 * incremented again when the (new) value of bfqq->dispatched
2564 * happens to be taken into account.
2567 bfq_update_peak_rate(q
->elevator
->elevator_data
, rq
);
2569 bfq_remove_request(q
, rq
);
2572 static void __bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2575 * If this bfqq is shared between multiple processes, check
2576 * to make sure that those processes are still issuing I/Os
2577 * within the mean seek distance. If not, it may be time to
2578 * break the queues apart again.
2580 if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq
) && BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
))
2581 bfq_mark_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
);
2583 if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
2584 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0)
2586 * Overloading budget_timeout field to store
2587 * the time at which the queue remains with no
2588 * backlog and no outstanding request; used by
2589 * the weight-raising mechanism.
2591 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
;
2593 bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd
, bfqq
, true);
2595 bfq_requeue_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, true);
2597 * Resort priority tree of potential close cooperators.
2599 bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd
, bfqq
);
2603 * All in-service entities must have been properly deactivated
2604 * or requeued before executing the next function, which
2605 * resets all in-service entites as no more in service.
2607 __bfq_bfqd_reset_in_service(bfqd
);
2611 * __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget - try to adapt the budget to the @bfqq behavior.
2612 * @bfqd: device data.
2613 * @bfqq: queue to update.
2614 * @reason: reason for expiration.
2616 * Handle the feedback on @bfqq budget at queue expiration.
2617 * See the body for detailed comments.
2619 static void __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2620 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2621 enum bfqq_expiration reason
)
2623 struct request
*next_rq
;
2624 int budget
, min_budget
;
2626 min_budget
= bfq_min_budget(bfqd
);
2628 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
2629 budget
= bfqq
->max_budget
;
2631 * Use a constant, low budget for weight-raised queues,
2632 * to help achieve a low latency. Keep it slightly higher
2633 * than the minimum possible budget, to cause a little
2634 * bit fewer expirations.
2636 budget
= 2 * min_budget
;
2638 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: last budg %d, budg left %d",
2639 bfqq
->entity
.budget
, bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
));
2640 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: last max_budg %d, min budg %d",
2641 budget
, bfq_min_budget(bfqd
));
2642 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "recalc_budg: sync %d, seeky %d",
2643 bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
), BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqd
->in_service_queue
));
2645 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) && bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1) {
2648 * Caveat: in all the following cases we trade latency
2651 case BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
:
2653 * This is the only case where we may reduce
2654 * the budget: if there is no request of the
2655 * process still waiting for completion, then
2656 * we assume (tentatively) that the timer has
2657 * expired because the batch of requests of
2658 * the process could have been served with a
2659 * smaller budget. Hence, betting that
2660 * process will behave in the same way when it
2661 * becomes backlogged again, we reduce its
2662 * next budget. As long as we guess right,
2663 * this budget cut reduces the latency
2664 * experienced by the process.
2666 * However, if there are still outstanding
2667 * requests, then the process may have not yet
2668 * issued its next request just because it is
2669 * still waiting for the completion of some of
2670 * the still outstanding ones. So in this
2671 * subcase we do not reduce its budget, on the
2672 * contrary we increase it to possibly boost
2673 * the throughput, as discussed in the
2674 * comments to the BUDGET_TIMEOUT case.
2676 if (bfqq
->dispatched
> 0) /* still outstanding reqs */
2677 budget
= min(budget
* 2, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2679 if (budget
> 5 * min_budget
)
2680 budget
-= 4 * min_budget
;
2682 budget
= min_budget
;
2685 case BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
:
2687 * We double the budget here because it gives
2688 * the chance to boost the throughput if this
2689 * is not a seeky process (and has bumped into
2690 * this timeout because of, e.g., ZBR).
2692 budget
= min(budget
* 2, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2694 case BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
:
2696 * The process still has backlog, and did not
2697 * let either the budget timeout or the disk
2698 * idling timeout expire. Hence it is not
2699 * seeky, has a short thinktime and may be
2700 * happy with a higher budget too. So
2701 * definitely increase the budget of this good
2702 * candidate to boost the disk throughput.
2704 budget
= min(budget
* 4, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2706 case BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
:
2708 * For queues that expire for this reason, it
2709 * is particularly important to keep the
2710 * budget close to the actual service they
2711 * need. Doing so reduces the timestamp
2712 * misalignment problem described in the
2713 * comments in the body of
2714 * __bfq_activate_entity. In fact, suppose
2715 * that a queue systematically expires for
2716 * BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS and presents a
2717 * new request in time to enjoy timestamp
2718 * back-shifting. The larger the budget of the
2719 * queue is with respect to the service the
2720 * queue actually requests in each service
2721 * slot, the more times the queue can be
2722 * reactivated with the same virtual finish
2723 * time. It follows that, even if this finish
2724 * time is pushed to the system virtual time
2725 * to reduce the consequent timestamp
2726 * misalignment, the queue unjustly enjoys for
2727 * many re-activations a lower finish time
2728 * than all newly activated queues.
2730 * The service needed by bfqq is measured
2731 * quite precisely by bfqq->entity.service.
2732 * Since bfqq does not enjoy device idling,
2733 * bfqq->entity.service is equal to the number
2734 * of sectors that the process associated with
2735 * bfqq requested to read/write before waiting
2736 * for request completions, or blocking for
2739 budget
= max_t(int, bfqq
->entity
.service
, min_budget
);
2744 } else if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
)) {
2746 * Async queues get always the maximum possible
2747 * budget, as for them we do not care about latency
2748 * (in addition, their ability to dispatch is limited
2749 * by the charging factor).
2751 budget
= bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
;
2754 bfqq
->max_budget
= budget
;
2756 if (bfqd
->budgets_assigned
>= bfq_stats_min_budgets
&&
2757 !bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
)
2758 bfqq
->max_budget
= min(bfqq
->max_budget
, bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
);
2761 * If there is still backlog, then assign a new budget, making
2762 * sure that it is large enough for the next request. Since
2763 * the finish time of bfqq must be kept in sync with the
2764 * budget, be sure to call __bfq_bfqq_expire() *after* this
2767 * If there is no backlog, then no need to update the budget;
2768 * it will be updated on the arrival of a new request.
2770 next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
2772 bfqq
->entity
.budget
= max_t(unsigned long, bfqq
->max_budget
,
2773 bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
));
2775 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "head sect: %u, new budget %d",
2776 next_rq
? blk_rq_sectors(next_rq
) : 0,
2777 bfqq
->entity
.budget
);
2781 * Return true if the process associated with bfqq is "slow". The slow
2782 * flag is used, in addition to the budget timeout, to reduce the
2783 * amount of service provided to seeky processes, and thus reduce
2784 * their chances to lower the throughput. More details in the comments
2785 * on the function bfq_bfqq_expire().
2787 * An important observation is in order: as discussed in the comments
2788 * on the function bfq_update_peak_rate(), with devices with internal
2789 * queues, it is hard if ever possible to know when and for how long
2790 * an I/O request is processed by the device (apart from the trivial
2791 * I/O pattern where a new request is dispatched only after the
2792 * previous one has been completed). This makes it hard to evaluate
2793 * the real rate at which the I/O requests of each bfq_queue are
2794 * served. In fact, for an I/O scheduler like BFQ, serving a
2795 * bfq_queue means just dispatching its requests during its service
2796 * slot (i.e., until the budget of the queue is exhausted, or the
2797 * queue remains idle, or, finally, a timeout fires). But, during the
2798 * service slot of a bfq_queue, around 100 ms at most, the device may
2799 * be even still processing requests of bfq_queues served in previous
2800 * service slots. On the opposite end, the requests of the in-service
2801 * bfq_queue may be completed after the service slot of the queue
2804 * Anyway, unless more sophisticated solutions are used
2805 * (where possible), the sum of the sizes of the requests dispatched
2806 * during the service slot of a bfq_queue is probably the only
2807 * approximation available for the service received by the bfq_queue
2808 * during its service slot. And this sum is the quantity used in this
2809 * function to evaluate the I/O speed of a process.
2811 static bool bfq_bfqq_is_slow(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2812 bool compensate
, enum bfqq_expiration reason
,
2813 unsigned long *delta_ms
)
2815 ktime_t delta_ktime
;
2817 bool slow
= BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
); /* if delta too short, use seekyness */
2819 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
))
2823 delta_ktime
= bfqd
->last_idling_start
;
2825 delta_ktime
= ktime_get();
2826 delta_ktime
= ktime_sub(delta_ktime
, bfqd
->last_budget_start
);
2827 delta_usecs
= ktime_to_us(delta_ktime
);
2829 /* don't use too short time intervals */
2830 if (delta_usecs
< 1000) {
2831 if (blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
))
2833 * give same worst-case guarantees as idling
2836 *delta_ms
= BFQ_MIN_TT
/ NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
2837 else /* charge at least one seek */
2838 *delta_ms
= bfq_slice_idle
/ NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
2843 *delta_ms
= delta_usecs
/ USEC_PER_MSEC
;
2846 * Use only long (> 20ms) intervals to filter out excessive
2847 * spikes in service rate estimation.
2849 if (delta_usecs
> 20000) {
2851 * Caveat for rotational devices: processes doing I/O
2852 * in the slower disk zones tend to be slow(er) even
2853 * if not seeky. In this respect, the estimated peak
2854 * rate is likely to be an average over the disk
2855 * surface. Accordingly, to not be too harsh with
2856 * unlucky processes, a process is deemed slow only if
2857 * its rate has been lower than half of the estimated
2860 slow
= bfqq
->entity
.service
< bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
/ 2;
2863 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "bfq_bfqq_is_slow: slow %d", slow
);
2869 * To be deemed as soft real-time, an application must meet two
2870 * requirements. First, the application must not require an average
2871 * bandwidth higher than the approximate bandwidth required to playback or
2872 * record a compressed high-definition video.
2873 * The next function is invoked on the completion of the last request of a
2874 * batch, to compute the next-start time instant, soft_rt_next_start, such
2875 * that, if the next request of the application does not arrive before
2876 * soft_rt_next_start, then the above requirement on the bandwidth is met.
2878 * The second requirement is that the request pattern of the application is
2879 * isochronous, i.e., that, after issuing a request or a batch of requests,
2880 * the application stops issuing new requests until all its pending requests
2881 * have been completed. After that, the application may issue a new batch,
2883 * For this reason the next function is invoked to compute
2884 * soft_rt_next_start only for applications that meet this requirement,
2885 * whereas soft_rt_next_start is set to infinity for applications that do
2888 * Unfortunately, even a greedy application may happen to behave in an
2889 * isochronous way if the CPU load is high. In fact, the application may
2890 * stop issuing requests while the CPUs are busy serving other processes,
2891 * then restart, then stop again for a while, and so on. In addition, if
2892 * the disk achieves a low enough throughput with the request pattern
2893 * issued by the application (e.g., because the request pattern is random
2894 * and/or the device is slow), then the application may meet the above
2895 * bandwidth requirement too. To prevent such a greedy application to be
2896 * deemed as soft real-time, a further rule is used in the computation of
2897 * soft_rt_next_start: soft_rt_next_start must be higher than the current
2898 * time plus the maximum time for which the arrival of a request is waited
2899 * for when a sync queue becomes idle, namely bfqd->bfq_slice_idle.
2900 * This filters out greedy applications, as the latter issue instead their
2901 * next request as soon as possible after the last one has been completed
2902 * (in contrast, when a batch of requests is completed, a soft real-time
2903 * application spends some time processing data).
2905 * Unfortunately, the last filter may easily generate false positives if
2906 * only bfqd->bfq_slice_idle is used as a reference time interval and one
2907 * or both the following cases occur:
2908 * 1) HZ is so low that the duration of a jiffy is comparable to or higher
2909 * than bfqd->bfq_slice_idle. This happens, e.g., on slow devices with
2911 * 2) jiffies, instead of increasing at a constant rate, may stop increasing
2912 * for a while, then suddenly 'jump' by several units to recover the lost
2913 * increments. This seems to happen, e.g., inside virtual machines.
2914 * To address this issue, we do not use as a reference time interval just
2915 * bfqd->bfq_slice_idle, but bfqd->bfq_slice_idle plus a few jiffies. In
2916 * particular we add the minimum number of jiffies for which the filter
2917 * seems to be quite precise also in embedded systems and KVM/QEMU virtual
2920 static unsigned long bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2921 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
2923 return max(bfqq
->last_idle_bklogged
+
2924 HZ
* bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
/
2925 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
,
2926 jiffies
+ nsecs_to_jiffies(bfqq
->bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
) + 4);
2930 * bfq_bfqq_expire - expire a queue.
2931 * @bfqd: device owning the queue.
2932 * @bfqq: the queue to expire.
2933 * @compensate: if true, compensate for the time spent idling.
2934 * @reason: the reason causing the expiration.
2936 * If the process associated with bfqq does slow I/O (e.g., because it
2937 * issues random requests), we charge bfqq with the time it has been
2938 * in service instead of the service it has received (see
2939 * bfq_bfqq_charge_time for details on how this goal is achieved). As
2940 * a consequence, bfqq will typically get higher timestamps upon
2941 * reactivation, and hence it will be rescheduled as if it had
2942 * received more service than what it has actually received. In the
2943 * end, bfqq receives less service in proportion to how slowly its
2944 * associated process consumes its budgets (and hence how seriously it
2945 * tends to lower the throughput). In addition, this time-charging
2946 * strategy guarantees time fairness among slow processes. In
2947 * contrast, if the process associated with bfqq is not slow, we
2948 * charge bfqq exactly with the service it has received.
2950 * Charging time to the first type of queues and the exact service to
2951 * the other has the effect of using the WF2Q+ policy to schedule the
2952 * former on a timeslice basis, without violating service domain
2953 * guarantees among the latter.
2955 void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
2956 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
2958 enum bfqq_expiration reason
)
2961 unsigned long delta
= 0;
2962 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
2966 * Check whether the process is slow (see bfq_bfqq_is_slow).
2968 slow
= bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd
, bfqq
, compensate
, reason
, &delta
);
2971 * Increase service_from_backlogged before next statement,
2972 * because the possible next invocation of
2973 * bfq_bfqq_charge_time would likely inflate
2974 * entity->service. In contrast, service_from_backlogged must
2975 * contain real service, to enable the soft real-time
2976 * heuristic to correctly compute the bandwidth consumed by
2979 bfqq
->service_from_backlogged
+= entity
->service
;
2982 * As above explained, charge slow (typically seeky) and
2983 * timed-out queues with the time and not the service
2984 * received, to favor sequential workloads.
2986 * Processes doing I/O in the slower disk zones will tend to
2987 * be slow(er) even if not seeky. Therefore, since the
2988 * estimated peak rate is actually an average over the disk
2989 * surface, these processes may timeout just for bad luck. To
2990 * avoid punishing them, do not charge time to processes that
2991 * succeeded in consuming at least 2/3 of their budget. This
2992 * allows BFQ to preserve enough elasticity to still perform
2993 * bandwidth, and not time, distribution with little unlucky
2994 * or quasi-sequential processes.
2996 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1 &&
2998 (reason
== BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
&&
2999 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= entity
->budget
/ 3)))
3000 bfq_bfqq_charge_time(bfqd
, bfqq
, delta
);
3002 if (reason
== BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
&&
3003 entity
->service
<= 2 * entity
->budget
/ 10)
3004 bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
3006 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& bfqq
->wr_coeff
== 1)
3007 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
3009 if (bfqd
->low_latency
&& bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
> 0 &&
3010 RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
)) {
3012 * If we get here, and there are no outstanding
3013 * requests, then the request pattern is isochronous
3014 * (see the comments on the function
3015 * bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()). Thus we can compute
3016 * soft_rt_next_start. If, instead, the queue still
3017 * has outstanding requests, then we have to wait for
3018 * the completion of all the outstanding requests to
3019 * discover whether the request pattern is actually
3022 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0)
3023 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
3024 bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3027 * The application is still waiting for the
3028 * completion of one or more requests:
3029 * prevent it from possibly being incorrectly
3030 * deemed as soft real-time by setting its
3031 * soft_rt_next_start to infinity. In fact,
3032 * without this assignment, the application
3033 * would be incorrectly deemed as soft
3035 * 1) it issued a new request before the
3036 * completion of all its in-flight
3038 * 2) at that time, its soft_rt_next_start
3039 * happened to be in the past.
3041 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
3042 bfq_greatest_from_now();
3044 * Schedule an update of soft_rt_next_start to when
3045 * the task may be discovered to be isochronous.
3047 bfq_mark_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
);
3051 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
3052 "expire (%d, slow %d, num_disp %d, short_ttime %d)", reason
,
3053 slow
, bfqq
->dispatched
, bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
));
3056 * Increase, decrease or leave budget unchanged according to
3059 __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(bfqd
, bfqq
, reason
);
3061 __bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3063 /* mark bfqq as waiting a request only if a bic still points to it */
3064 if (ref
> 1 && !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
) &&
3065 reason
!= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
&&
3066 reason
!= BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
)
3067 bfq_mark_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq
);
3071 * Budget timeout is not implemented through a dedicated timer, but
3072 * just checked on request arrivals and completions, as well as on
3073 * idle timer expirations.
3075 static bool bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3077 return time_is_before_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->budget_timeout
);
3081 * If we expire a queue that is actively waiting (i.e., with the
3082 * device idled) for the arrival of a new request, then we may incur
3083 * the timestamp misalignment problem described in the body of the
3084 * function __bfq_activate_entity. Hence we return true only if this
3085 * condition does not hold, or if the queue is slow enough to deserve
3086 * only to be kicked off for preserving a high throughput.
3088 static bool bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3090 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
,
3091 "may_budget_timeout: wait_request %d left %d timeout %d",
3092 bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
),
3093 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= bfqq
->entity
.budget
/ 3,
3094 bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
));
3096 return (!bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) ||
3097 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
) >= bfqq
->entity
.budget
/ 3)
3099 bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
);
3103 * For a queue that becomes empty, device idling is allowed only if
3104 * this function returns true for the queue. As a consequence, since
3105 * device idling plays a critical role in both throughput boosting and
3106 * service guarantees, the return value of this function plays a
3107 * critical role in both these aspects as well.
3109 * In a nutshell, this function returns true only if idling is
3110 * beneficial for throughput or, even if detrimental for throughput,
3111 * idling is however necessary to preserve service guarantees (low
3112 * latency, desired throughput distribution, ...). In particular, on
3113 * NCQ-capable devices, this function tries to return false, so as to
3114 * help keep the drives' internal queues full, whenever this helps the
3115 * device boost the throughput without causing any service-guarantee
3118 * In more detail, the return value of this function is obtained by,
3119 * first, computing a number of boolean variables that take into
3120 * account throughput and service-guarantee issues, and, then,
3121 * combining these variables in a logical expression. Most of the
3122 * issues taken into account are not trivial. We discuss these issues
3123 * individually while introducing the variables.
3125 static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3127 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
3128 bool rot_without_queueing
=
3129 !blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
) && !bfqd
->hw_tag
,
3130 bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound
,
3131 idling_boosts_thr
, idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
,
3132 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
,
3133 asymmetric_scenario
;
3135 if (bfqd
->strict_guarantees
)
3139 * Idling is performed only if slice_idle > 0. In addition, we
3142 * (b) bfqq is in the idle io prio class: in this case we do
3143 * not idle because we want to minimize the bandwidth that
3144 * queues in this class can steal to higher-priority queues
3146 if (bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
== 0 || !bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) ||
3147 bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
3150 bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound
= !BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
) &&
3151 bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
) && bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
3154 * The next variable takes into account the cases where idling
3155 * boosts the throughput.
3157 * The value of the variable is computed considering, first, that
3158 * idling is virtually always beneficial for the throughput if:
3159 * (a) the device is not NCQ-capable and rotational, or
3160 * (b) regardless of the presence of NCQ, the device is rotational and
3161 * the request pattern for bfqq is I/O-bound and sequential, or
3162 * (c) regardless of whether it is rotational, the device is
3163 * not NCQ-capable and the request pattern for bfqq is
3164 * I/O-bound and sequential.
3166 * Secondly, and in contrast to the above item (b), idling an
3167 * NCQ-capable flash-based device would not boost the
3168 * throughput even with sequential I/O; rather it would lower
3169 * the throughput in proportion to how fast the device
3170 * is. Accordingly, the next variable is true if any of the
3171 * above conditions (a), (b) or (c) is true, and, in
3172 * particular, happens to be false if bfqd is an NCQ-capable
3173 * flash-based device.
3175 idling_boosts_thr
= rot_without_queueing
||
3176 ((!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
) || !bfqd
->hw_tag
) &&
3177 bfqq_sequential_and_IO_bound
);
3180 * The value of the next variable,
3181 * idling_boosts_thr_without_issues, is equal to that of
3182 * idling_boosts_thr, unless a special case holds. In this
3183 * special case, described below, idling may cause problems to
3184 * weight-raised queues.
3186 * When the request pool is saturated (e.g., in the presence
3187 * of write hogs), if the processes associated with
3188 * non-weight-raised queues ask for requests at a lower rate,
3189 * then processes associated with weight-raised queues have a
3190 * higher probability to get a request from the pool
3191 * immediately (or at least soon) when they need one. Thus
3192 * they have a higher probability to actually get a fraction
3193 * of the device throughput proportional to their high
3194 * weight. This is especially true with NCQ-capable drives,
3195 * which enqueue several requests in advance, and further
3196 * reorder internally-queued requests.
3198 * For this reason, we force to false the value of
3199 * idling_boosts_thr_without_issues if there are weight-raised
3200 * busy queues. In this case, and if bfqq is not weight-raised,
3201 * this guarantees that the device is not idled for bfqq (if,
3202 * instead, bfqq is weight-raised, then idling will be
3203 * guaranteed by another variable, see below). Combined with
3204 * the timestamping rules of BFQ (see [1] for details), this
3205 * behavior causes bfqq, and hence any sync non-weight-raised
3206 * queue, to get a lower number of requests served, and thus
3207 * to ask for a lower number of requests from the request
3208 * pool, before the busy weight-raised queues get served
3209 * again. This often mitigates starvation problems in the
3210 * presence of heavy write workloads and NCQ, thereby
3211 * guaranteeing a higher application and system responsiveness
3212 * in these hostile scenarios.
3214 idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
= idling_boosts_thr
&&
3215 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
== 0;
3218 * There is then a case where idling must be performed not
3219 * for throughput concerns, but to preserve service
3222 * To introduce this case, we can note that allowing the drive
3223 * to enqueue more than one request at a time, and hence
3224 * delegating de facto final scheduling decisions to the
3225 * drive's internal scheduler, entails loss of control on the
3226 * actual request service order. In particular, the critical
3227 * situation is when requests from different processes happen
3228 * to be present, at the same time, in the internal queue(s)
3229 * of the drive. In such a situation, the drive, by deciding
3230 * the service order of the internally-queued requests, does
3231 * determine also the actual throughput distribution among
3232 * these processes. But the drive typically has no notion or
3233 * concern about per-process throughput distribution, and
3234 * makes its decisions only on a per-request basis. Therefore,
3235 * the service distribution enforced by the drive's internal
3236 * scheduler is likely to coincide with the desired
3237 * device-throughput distribution only in a completely
3238 * symmetric scenario where:
3239 * (i) each of these processes must get the same throughput as
3241 * (ii) all these processes have the same I/O pattern
3242 (either sequential or random).
3243 * In fact, in such a scenario, the drive will tend to treat
3244 * the requests of each of these processes in about the same
3245 * way as the requests of the others, and thus to provide
3246 * each of these processes with about the same throughput
3247 * (which is exactly the desired throughput distribution). In
3248 * contrast, in any asymmetric scenario, device idling is
3249 * certainly needed to guarantee that bfqq receives its
3250 * assigned fraction of the device throughput (see [1] for
3253 * We address this issue by controlling, actually, only the
3254 * symmetry sub-condition (i), i.e., provided that
3255 * sub-condition (i) holds, idling is not performed,
3256 * regardless of whether sub-condition (ii) holds. In other
3257 * words, only if sub-condition (i) holds, then idling is
3258 * allowed, and the device tends to be prevented from queueing
3259 * many requests, possibly of several processes. The reason
3260 * for not controlling also sub-condition (ii) is that we
3261 * exploit preemption to preserve guarantees in case of
3262 * symmetric scenarios, even if (ii) does not hold, as
3263 * explained in the next two paragraphs.
3265 * Even if a queue, say Q, is expired when it remains idle, Q
3266 * can still preempt the new in-service queue if the next
3267 * request of Q arrives soon (see the comments on
3268 * bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation). If all queues and
3269 * groups have the same weight, this form of preemption,
3270 * combined with the hole-recovery heuristic described in the
3271 * comments on function bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation,
3272 * are enough to preserve a correct bandwidth distribution in
3273 * the mid term, even without idling. In fact, even if not
3274 * idling allows the internal queues of the device to contain
3275 * many requests, and thus to reorder requests, we can rather
3276 * safely assume that the internal scheduler still preserves a
3277 * minimum of mid-term fairness. The motivation for using
3278 * preemption instead of idling is that, by not idling,
3279 * service guarantees are preserved without minimally
3280 * sacrificing throughput. In other words, both a high
3281 * throughput and its desired distribution are obtained.
3283 * More precisely, this preemption-based, idleless approach
3284 * provides fairness in terms of IOPS, and not sectors per
3285 * second. This can be seen with a simple example. Suppose
3286 * that there are two queues with the same weight, but that
3287 * the first queue receives requests of 8 sectors, while the
3288 * second queue receives requests of 1024 sectors. In
3289 * addition, suppose that each of the two queues contains at
3290 * most one request at a time, which implies that each queue
3291 * always remains idle after it is served. Finally, after
3292 * remaining idle, each queue receives very quickly a new
3293 * request. It follows that the two queues are served
3294 * alternatively, preempting each other if needed. This
3295 * implies that, although both queues have the same weight,
3296 * the queue with large requests receives a service that is
3297 * 1024/8 times as high as the service received by the other
3300 * On the other hand, device idling is performed, and thus
3301 * pure sector-domain guarantees are provided, for the
3302 * following queues, which are likely to need stronger
3303 * throughput guarantees: weight-raised queues, and queues
3304 * with a higher weight than other queues. When such queues
3305 * are active, sub-condition (i) is false, which triggers
3308 * According to the above considerations, the next variable is
3309 * true (only) if sub-condition (i) holds. To compute the
3310 * value of this variable, we not only use the return value of
3311 * the function bfq_symmetric_scenario(), but also check
3312 * whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because
3313 * bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also
3314 * weight-raised queues (see comments on
3315 * bfq_weights_tree_add()).
3317 * As a side note, it is worth considering that the above
3318 * device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the
3319 * following unlucky scenario: if idling is (correctly)
3320 * disabled in a time period during which all symmetry
3321 * sub-conditions hold, and hence the device is allowed to
3322 * enqueue many requests, but at some later point in time some
3323 * sub-condition stops to hold, then it may become impossible
3324 * to let requests be served in the desired order until all
3325 * the requests already queued in the device have been served.
3327 asymmetric_scenario
= bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1 ||
3328 !bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd
);
3331 * Finally, there is a case where maximizing throughput is the
3332 * best choice even if it may cause unfairness toward
3333 * bfqq. Such a case is when bfqq became active in a burst of
3334 * queue activations. Queues that became active during a large
3335 * burst benefit only from throughput, as discussed in the
3336 * comments on bfq_handle_burst. Thus, if bfqq became active
3337 * in a burst and not idling the device maximizes throughput,
3338 * then the device must no be idled, because not idling the
3339 * device provides bfqq and all other queues in the burst with
3340 * maximum benefit. Combining this and the above case, we can
3341 * now establish when idling is actually needed to preserve
3342 * service guarantees.
3344 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
=
3345 asymmetric_scenario
&& !bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
3348 * We have now all the components we need to compute the
3349 * return value of the function, which is true only if idling
3350 * either boosts the throughput (without issues), or is
3351 * necessary to preserve service guarantees.
3353 return idling_boosts_thr_without_issues
||
3354 idling_needed_for_service_guarantees
;
3358 * If the in-service queue is empty but the function bfq_bfqq_may_idle
3359 * returns true, then:
3360 * 1) the queue must remain in service and cannot be expired, and
3361 * 2) the device must be idled to wait for the possible arrival of a new
3362 * request for the queue.
3363 * See the comments on the function bfq_bfqq_may_idle for the reasons
3364 * why performing device idling is the best choice to boost the throughput
3365 * and preserve service guarantees when bfq_bfqq_may_idle itself
3368 static bool bfq_bfqq_must_idle(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3370 return RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
) && bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
);
3374 * Select a queue for service. If we have a current queue in service,
3375 * check whether to continue servicing it, or retrieve and set a new one.
3377 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
3379 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3380 struct request
*next_rq
;
3381 enum bfqq_expiration reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
;
3383 bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
3387 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: already in-service queue");
3389 if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq
) &&
3390 !bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) &&
3391 !bfq_bfqq_must_idle(bfqq
))
3396 * This loop is rarely executed more than once. Even when it
3397 * happens, it is much more convenient to re-execute this loop
3398 * than to return NULL and trigger a new dispatch to get a
3401 next_rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
3403 * If bfqq has requests queued and it has enough budget left to
3404 * serve them, keep the queue, otherwise expire it.
3407 if (bfq_serv_to_charge(next_rq
, bfqq
) >
3408 bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq
)) {
3410 * Expire the queue for budget exhaustion,
3411 * which makes sure that the next budget is
3412 * enough to serve the next request, even if
3413 * it comes from the fifo expired path.
3415 reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
;
3419 * The idle timer may be pending because we may
3420 * not disable disk idling even when a new request
3423 if (bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
)) {
3425 * If we get here: 1) at least a new request
3426 * has arrived but we have not disabled the
3427 * timer because the request was too small,
3428 * 2) then the block layer has unplugged
3429 * the device, causing the dispatch to be
3432 * Since the device is unplugged, now the
3433 * requests are probably large enough to
3434 * provide a reasonable throughput.
3435 * So we disable idling.
3437 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
3438 hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
3439 bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
3446 * No requests pending. However, if the in-service queue is idling
3447 * for a new request, or has requests waiting for a completion and
3448 * may idle after their completion, then keep it anyway.
3450 if (bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
) ||
3451 (bfqq
->dispatched
!= 0 && bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
))) {
3456 reason
= BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
;
3458 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, reason
);
3460 bfqq
= bfq_set_in_service_queue(bfqd
);
3462 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: checking new queue");
3467 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "select_queue: returned this queue");
3469 bfq_log(bfqd
, "select_queue: no queue returned");
3474 static void bfq_update_wr_data(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3476 struct bfq_entity
*entity
= &bfqq
->entity
;
3478 if (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1) { /* queue is being weight-raised */
3479 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
3480 "raising period dur %u/%u msec, old coeff %u, w %d(%d)",
3481 jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies
- bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
),
3482 jiffies_to_msecs(bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
),
3484 bfqq
->entity
.weight
, bfqq
->entity
.orig_weight
);
3486 if (entity
->prio_changed
)
3487 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "WARN: pending prio change");
3490 * If the queue was activated in a burst, or too much
3491 * time has elapsed from the beginning of this
3492 * weight-raising period, then end weight raising.
3494 if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
))
3495 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
3496 else if (time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
+
3497 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
)) {
3498 if (bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
!= bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
||
3499 time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
+
3500 bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
)))
3501 bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq
);
3503 /* switch back to interactive wr */
3504 bfqq
->wr_coeff
= bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
;
3505 bfqq
->wr_cur_max_time
= bfq_wr_duration(bfqd
);
3506 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
=
3507 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
;
3508 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
3513 * To improve latency (for this or other queues), immediately
3514 * update weight both if it must be raised and if it must be
3515 * lowered. Since, entity may be on some active tree here, and
3516 * might have a pending change of its ioprio class, invoke
3517 * next function with the last parameter unset (see the
3518 * comments on the function).
3520 if ((entity
->weight
> entity
->orig_weight
) != (bfqq
->wr_coeff
> 1))
3521 __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(bfq_entity_service_tree(entity
),
3526 * Dispatch next request from bfqq.
3528 static struct request
*bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3529 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3531 struct request
*rq
= bfqq
->next_rq
;
3532 unsigned long service_to_charge
;
3534 service_to_charge
= bfq_serv_to_charge(rq
, bfqq
);
3536 bfq_bfqq_served(bfqq
, service_to_charge
);
3538 bfq_dispatch_remove(bfqd
->queue
, rq
);
3541 * If weight raising has to terminate for bfqq, then next
3542 * function causes an immediate update of bfqq's weight,
3543 * without waiting for next activation. As a consequence, on
3544 * expiration, bfqq will be timestamped as if has never been
3545 * weight-raised during this service slot, even if it has
3546 * received part or even most of the service as a
3547 * weight-raised queue. This inflates bfqq's timestamps, which
3548 * is beneficial, as bfqq is then more willing to leave the
3549 * device immediately to possible other weight-raised queues.
3551 bfq_update_wr_data(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3554 * Expire bfqq, pretending that its budget expired, if bfqq
3555 * belongs to CLASS_IDLE and other queues are waiting for
3558 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
> 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
3564 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED
);
3568 static bool bfq_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3570 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3573 * Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->busy_queues should cause at
3574 * most a call to dispatch for nothing
3576 return !list_empty_careful(&bfqd
->dispatch
) ||
3577 bfqd
->busy_queues
> 0;
3580 static struct request
*__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3582 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3583 struct request
*rq
= NULL
;
3584 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= NULL
;
3586 if (!list_empty(&bfqd
->dispatch
)) {
3587 rq
= list_first_entry(&bfqd
->dispatch
, struct request
,
3589 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
3595 * Increment counters here, because this
3596 * dispatch does not follow the standard
3597 * dispatch flow (where counters are
3602 goto inc_in_driver_start_rq
;
3606 * We exploit the put_rq_private hook to decrement
3607 * rq_in_driver, but put_rq_private will not be
3608 * invoked on this request. So, to avoid unbalance,
3609 * just start this request, without incrementing
3610 * rq_in_driver. As a negative consequence,
3611 * rq_in_driver is deceptively lower than it should be
3612 * while this request is in service. This may cause
3613 * bfq_schedule_dispatch to be invoked uselessly.
3615 * As for implementing an exact solution, the
3616 * put_request hook, if defined, is probably invoked
3617 * also on this request. So, by exploiting this hook,
3618 * we could 1) increment rq_in_driver here, and 2)
3619 * decrement it in put_request. Such a solution would
3620 * let the value of the counter be always accurate,
3621 * but it would entail using an extra interface
3622 * function. This cost seems higher than the benefit,
3623 * being the frequency of non-elevator-private
3624 * requests very low.
3629 bfq_log(bfqd
, "dispatch requests: %d busy queues", bfqd
->busy_queues
);
3631 if (bfqd
->busy_queues
== 0)
3635 * Force device to serve one request at a time if
3636 * strict_guarantees is true. Forcing this service scheme is
3637 * currently the ONLY way to guarantee that the request
3638 * service order enforced by the scheduler is respected by a
3639 * queueing device. Otherwise the device is free even to make
3640 * some unlucky request wait for as long as the device
3643 * Of course, serving one request at at time may cause loss of
3646 if (bfqd
->strict_guarantees
&& bfqd
->rq_in_driver
> 0)
3649 bfqq
= bfq_select_queue(bfqd
);
3653 rq
= bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3656 inc_in_driver_start_rq
:
3657 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
++;
3659 rq
->rq_flags
|= RQF_STARTED
;
3665 static struct request
*bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
)
3667 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= hctx
->queue
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
3670 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
3672 rq
= __bfq_dispatch_request(hctx
);
3673 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
3679 * Task holds one reference to the queue, dropped when task exits. Each rq
3680 * in-flight on this queue also holds a reference, dropped when rq is freed.
3682 * Scheduler lock must be held here. Recall not to use bfqq after calling
3683 * this function on it.
3685 void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3687 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
3688 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
= bfqq_group(bfqq
);
3692 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "put_queue: %p %d",
3699 if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
))
3701 * The fact that this queue is being destroyed does not
3702 * invalidate the fact that this queue may have been
3703 * activated during the current burst. As a consequence,
3704 * although the queue does not exist anymore, and hence
3705 * needs to be removed from the burst list if there,
3706 * the burst size has not to be decremented.
3708 hlist_del_init(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
3710 kmem_cache_free(bfq_pool
, bfqq
);
3711 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
3712 bfqg_and_blkg_put(bfqg
);
3716 static void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3718 struct bfq_queue
*__bfqq
, *next
;
3721 * If this queue was scheduled to merge with another queue, be
3722 * sure to drop the reference taken on that queue (and others in
3723 * the merge chain). See bfq_setup_merge and bfq_merge_bfqqs.
3725 __bfqq
= bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
3729 next
= __bfqq
->new_bfqq
;
3730 bfq_put_queue(__bfqq
);
3735 static void bfq_exit_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3737 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
3738 __bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3739 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
3742 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "exit_bfqq: %p, %d", bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
3744 bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq
);
3746 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
); /* release process reference */
3749 static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, bool is_sync
)
3751 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, is_sync
);
3752 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
3755 bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
; /* NULL if scheduler already exited */
3758 unsigned long flags
;
3760 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
3761 bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
);
3762 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, NULL
, is_sync
);
3763 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
3767 static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq
*icq
)
3769 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= icq_to_bic(icq
);
3771 bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic
, true);
3772 bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic
, false);
3776 * Update the entity prio values; note that the new values will not
3777 * be used until the next (re)activation.
3780 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
3782 struct task_struct
*tsk
= current
;
3784 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
3789 ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bic
->ioprio
);
3790 switch (ioprio_class
) {
3792 dev_err(bfqq
->bfqd
->queue
->backing_dev_info
->dev
,
3793 "bfq: bad prio class %d\n", ioprio_class
);
3795 case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
:
3797 * No prio set, inherit CPU scheduling settings.
3799 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= task_nice_ioprio(tsk
);
3800 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= task_nice_ioclass(tsk
);
3802 case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
:
3803 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3804 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
;
3806 case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
:
3807 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3808 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
;
3810 case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
:
3811 bfqq
->new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
;
3812 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= 7;
3816 if (bfqq
->new_ioprio
>= IOPRIO_BE_NR
) {
3817 pr_crit("bfq_set_next_ioprio_data: new_ioprio %d\n",
3819 bfqq
->new_ioprio
= IOPRIO_BE_NR
;
3822 bfqq
->entity
.new_weight
= bfq_ioprio_to_weight(bfqq
->new_ioprio
);
3823 bfqq
->entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
3826 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3827 struct bio
*bio
, bool is_sync
,
3828 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
);
3830 static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bio
*bio
)
3832 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bic_to_bfqd(bic
);
3833 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3834 int ioprio
= bic
->icq
.ioc
->ioprio
;
3837 * This condition may trigger on a newly created bic, be sure to
3838 * drop the lock before returning.
3840 if (unlikely(!bfqd
) || likely(bic
->ioprio
== ioprio
))
3843 bic
->ioprio
= ioprio
;
3845 bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, false);
3847 /* release process reference on this queue */
3848 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
3849 bfqq
= bfq_get_queue(bfqd
, bio
, BLK_RW_ASYNC
, bic
);
3850 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
, false);
3853 bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, true);
3855 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(bfqq
, bic
);
3858 static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
3859 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, pid_t pid
, int is_sync
)
3861 RB_CLEAR_NODE(&bfqq
->entity
.rb_node
);
3862 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqq
->fifo
);
3863 INIT_HLIST_NODE(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
);
3869 bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(bfqq
, bic
);
3873 * No need to mark as has_short_ttime if in
3874 * idle_class, because no device idling is performed
3875 * for queues in idle class
3877 if (!bfq_class_idle(bfqq
))
3878 /* tentatively mark as has_short_ttime */
3879 bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
3880 bfq_mark_bfqq_sync(bfqq
);
3881 bfq_mark_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
3883 bfq_clear_bfqq_sync(bfqq
);
3885 /* set end request to minus infinity from now */
3886 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
= ktime_get_ns() + 1;
3888 bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq
);
3892 /* Tentative initial value to trade off between thr and lat */
3893 bfqq
->max_budget
= (2 * bfq_max_budget(bfqd
)) / 3;
3894 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3897 bfqq
->last_wr_start_finish
= jiffies
;
3898 bfqq
->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3899 bfqq
->split_time
= bfq_smallest_from_now();
3902 * Set to the value for which bfqq will not be deemed as
3903 * soft rt when it becomes backlogged.
3905 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
= bfq_greatest_from_now();
3907 /* first request is almost certainly seeky */
3908 bfqq
->seek_history
= 1;
3911 static struct bfq_queue
**bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3912 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
,
3913 int ioprio_class
, int ioprio
)
3915 switch (ioprio_class
) {
3916 case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
:
3917 return &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[0][ioprio
];
3918 case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
:
3919 ioprio
= IOPRIO_NORM
;
3921 case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
:
3922 return &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[1][ioprio
];
3923 case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE
:
3924 return &bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
;
3930 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3931 struct bio
*bio
, bool is_sync
,
3932 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
3934 const int ioprio
= IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(bic
->ioprio
);
3935 const int ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bic
->ioprio
);
3936 struct bfq_queue
**async_bfqq
= NULL
;
3937 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
3938 struct bfq_group
*bfqg
;
3942 bfqg
= bfq_find_set_group(bfqd
, bio_blkcg(bio
));
3944 bfqq
= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
;
3949 async_bfqq
= bfq_async_queue_prio(bfqd
, bfqg
, ioprio_class
,
3956 bfqq
= kmem_cache_alloc_node(bfq_pool
,
3957 GFP_NOWAIT
| __GFP_ZERO
| __GFP_NOWARN
,
3961 bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, bic
, current
->pid
,
3963 bfq_init_entity(&bfqq
->entity
, bfqg
);
3964 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "allocated");
3966 bfqq
= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
;
3967 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "using oom bfqq");
3972 * Pin the queue now that it's allocated, scheduler exit will
3977 * Extra group reference, w.r.t. sync
3978 * queue. This extra reference is removed
3979 * only if bfqq->bfqg disappears, to
3980 * guarantee that this queue is not freed
3981 * until its group goes away.
3983 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_queue, bfqq not in async: %p, %d",
3989 bfqq
->ref
++; /* get a process reference to this queue */
3990 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_queue, at end: %p, %d", bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
3995 static void bfq_update_io_thinktime(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
3996 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
3998 struct bfq_ttime
*ttime
= &bfqq
->ttime
;
3999 u64 elapsed
= ktime_get_ns() - bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
;
4001 elapsed
= min_t(u64
, elapsed
, 2ULL * bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
);
4003 ttime
->ttime_samples
= (7*bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_samples
+ 256) / 8;
4004 ttime
->ttime_total
= div_u64(7*ttime
->ttime_total
+ 256*elapsed
, 8);
4005 ttime
->ttime_mean
= div64_ul(ttime
->ttime_total
+ 128,
4006 ttime
->ttime_samples
);
4010 bfq_update_io_seektime(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
4013 bfqq
->seek_history
<<= 1;
4014 bfqq
->seek_history
|=
4015 get_sdist(bfqq
->last_request_pos
, rq
) > BFQQ_SEEK_THR
&&
4016 (!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
) ||
4017 blk_rq_sectors(rq
) < BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT
);
4020 static void bfq_update_has_short_ttime(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
4021 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
4022 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
)
4024 bool has_short_ttime
= true;
4027 * No need to update has_short_ttime if bfqq is async or in
4028 * idle io prio class, or if bfq_slice_idle is zero, because
4029 * no device idling is performed for bfqq in this case.
4031 if (!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq
) || bfq_class_idle(bfqq
) ||
4032 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
== 0)
4035 /* Idle window just restored, statistics are meaningless. */
4036 if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bfqq
->split_time
+
4037 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
))
4040 /* Think time is infinite if no process is linked to
4041 * bfqq. Otherwise check average think time to
4042 * decide whether to mark as has_short_ttime
4044 if (atomic_read(&bic
->icq
.ioc
->active_ref
) == 0 ||
4045 (bfq_sample_valid(bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_samples
) &&
4046 bfqq
->ttime
.ttime_mean
> bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
))
4047 has_short_ttime
= false;
4049 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "update_has_short_ttime: has_short_ttime %d",
4052 if (has_short_ttime
)
4053 bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
4055 bfq_clear_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
);
4059 * Called when a new fs request (rq) is added to bfqq. Check if there's
4060 * something we should do about it.
4062 static void bfq_rq_enqueued(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
,
4065 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
= RQ_BIC(rq
);
4067 if (rq
->cmd_flags
& REQ_META
)
4068 bfqq
->meta_pending
++;
4070 bfq_update_io_thinktime(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4071 bfq_update_has_short_ttime(bfqd
, bfqq
, bic
);
4072 bfq_update_io_seektime(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
4074 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
,
4075 "rq_enqueued: has_short_ttime=%d (seeky %d)",
4076 bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq
), BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq
));
4078 bfqq
->last_request_pos
= blk_rq_pos(rq
) + blk_rq_sectors(rq
);
4080 if (bfqq
== bfqd
->in_service_queue
&& bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
)) {
4081 bool small_req
= bfqq
->queued
[rq_is_sync(rq
)] == 1 &&
4082 blk_rq_sectors(rq
) < 32;
4083 bool budget_timeout
= bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
);
4086 * There is just this request queued: if the request
4087 * is small and the queue is not to be expired, then
4090 * In this way, if the device is being idled to wait
4091 * for a new request from the in-service queue, we
4092 * avoid unplugging the device and committing the
4093 * device to serve just a small request. On the
4094 * contrary, we wait for the block layer to decide
4095 * when to unplug the device: hopefully, new requests
4096 * will be merged to this one quickly, then the device
4097 * will be unplugged and larger requests will be
4100 if (small_req
&& !budget_timeout
)
4104 * A large enough request arrived, or the queue is to
4105 * be expired: in both cases disk idling is to be
4106 * stopped, so clear wait_request flag and reset
4109 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
4110 hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4111 bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq
));
4114 * The queue is not empty, because a new request just
4115 * arrived. Hence we can safely expire the queue, in
4116 * case of budget timeout, without risking that the
4117 * timestamps of the queue are not updated correctly.
4118 * See [1] for more details.
4121 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4122 BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
);
4126 static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct request
*rq
)
4128 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= RQ_BFQQ(rq
),
4129 *new_bfqq
= bfq_setup_cooperator(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
, true);
4132 if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1) != bfqq
)
4133 new_bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1);
4135 * Release the request's reference to the old bfqq
4136 * and make sure one is taken to the shared queue.
4138 new_bfqq
->allocated
++;
4141 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
);
4143 * If the bic associated with the process
4144 * issuing this request still points to bfqq
4145 * (and thus has not been already redirected
4146 * to new_bfqq or even some other bfq_queue),
4147 * then complete the merge and redirect it to
4150 if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq
), 1) == bfqq
)
4151 bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd
, RQ_BIC(rq
),
4154 * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq,
4155 * release rq reference on bfqq
4157 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4158 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = new_bfqq
;
4162 bfq_add_request(rq
);
4164 rq
->fifo_time
= ktime_get_ns() + bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[rq_is_sync(rq
)];
4165 list_add_tail(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqq
->fifo
);
4167 bfq_rq_enqueued(bfqd
, bfqq
, rq
);
4170 static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
, struct request
*rq
,
4173 struct request_queue
*q
= hctx
->queue
;
4174 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
4176 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4177 if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q
, rq
)) {
4178 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4182 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4184 blk_mq_sched_request_inserted(rq
);
4186 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4187 if (at_head
|| blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq
)) {
4189 list_add(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqd
->dispatch
);
4191 list_add_tail(&rq
->queuelist
, &bfqd
->dispatch
);
4193 __bfq_insert_request(bfqd
, rq
);
4195 if (rq_mergeable(rq
)) {
4196 elv_rqhash_add(q
, rq
);
4202 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4205 static void bfq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx
,
4206 struct list_head
*list
, bool at_head
)
4208 while (!list_empty(list
)) {
4211 rq
= list_first_entry(list
, struct request
, queuelist
);
4212 list_del_init(&rq
->queuelist
);
4213 bfq_insert_request(hctx
, rq
, at_head
);
4217 static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4219 bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
= max_t(int, bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
,
4220 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
);
4222 if (bfqd
->hw_tag
== 1)
4226 * This sample is valid if the number of outstanding requests
4227 * is large enough to allow a queueing behavior. Note that the
4228 * sum is not exact, as it's not taking into account deactivated
4231 if (bfqd
->rq_in_driver
+ bfqd
->queued
< BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD
)
4234 if (bfqd
->hw_tag_samples
++ < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES
)
4237 bfqd
->hw_tag
= bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
> BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD
;
4238 bfqd
->max_rq_in_driver
= 0;
4239 bfqd
->hw_tag_samples
= 0;
4242 static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4247 bfq_update_hw_tag(bfqd
);
4249 bfqd
->rq_in_driver
--;
4252 if (!bfqq
->dispatched
&& !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq
)) {
4254 * Set budget_timeout (which we overload to store the
4255 * time at which the queue remains with no backlog and
4256 * no outstanding request; used by the weight-raising
4259 bfqq
->budget_timeout
= jiffies
;
4261 bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd
, &bfqq
->entity
,
4262 &bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
);
4265 now_ns
= ktime_get_ns();
4267 bfqq
->ttime
.last_end_request
= now_ns
;
4270 * Using us instead of ns, to get a reasonable precision in
4271 * computing rate in next check.
4273 delta_us
= div_u64(now_ns
- bfqd
->last_completion
, NSEC_PER_USEC
);
4276 * If the request took rather long to complete, and, according
4277 * to the maximum request size recorded, this completion latency
4278 * implies that the request was certainly served at a very low
4279 * rate (less than 1M sectors/sec), then the whole observation
4280 * interval that lasts up to this time instant cannot be a
4281 * valid time interval for computing a new peak rate. Invoke
4282 * bfq_update_rate_reset to have the following three steps
4284 * - close the observation interval at the last (previous)
4285 * request dispatch or completion
4286 * - compute rate, if possible, for that observation interval
4287 * - reset to zero samples, which will trigger a proper
4288 * re-initialization of the observation interval on next
4291 if (delta_us
> BFQ_MIN_TT
/NSEC_PER_USEC
&&
4292 (bfqd
->last_rq_max_size
<<BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
)/delta_us
<
4293 1UL<<(BFQ_RATE_SHIFT
- 10))
4294 bfq_update_rate_reset(bfqd
, NULL
);
4295 bfqd
->last_completion
= now_ns
;
4298 * If we are waiting to discover whether the request pattern
4299 * of the task associated with the queue is actually
4300 * isochronous, and both requisites for this condition to hold
4301 * are now satisfied, then compute soft_rt_next_start (see the
4302 * comments on the function bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()). We
4303 * schedule this delayed check when bfqq expires, if it still
4304 * has in-flight requests.
4306 if (bfq_bfqq_softrt_update(bfqq
) && bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 &&
4307 RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
))
4308 bfqq
->soft_rt_next_start
=
4309 bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4312 * If this is the in-service queue, check if it needs to be expired,
4313 * or if we want to idle in case it has no pending requests.
4315 if (bfqd
->in_service_queue
== bfqq
) {
4316 if (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 && bfq_bfqq_must_idle(bfqq
)) {
4317 bfq_arm_slice_timer(bfqd
);
4319 } else if (bfq_may_expire_for_budg_timeout(bfqq
))
4320 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4321 BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
);
4322 else if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq
->sort_list
) &&
4323 (bfqq
->dispatched
== 0 ||
4324 !bfq_bfqq_may_idle(bfqq
)))
4325 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, false,
4326 BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS
);
4329 if (!bfqd
->rq_in_driver
)
4330 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
4333 static void bfq_put_rq_priv_body(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4337 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4340 static void bfq_finish_request(struct request
*rq
)
4342 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
4343 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
4351 if (rq
->rq_flags
& RQF_STARTED
)
4352 bfqg_stats_update_completion(bfqq_group(bfqq
),
4353 rq_start_time_ns(rq
),
4354 rq_io_start_time_ns(rq
),
4357 if (likely(rq
->rq_flags
& RQF_STARTED
)) {
4358 unsigned long flags
;
4360 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4362 bfq_completed_request(bfqq
, bfqd
);
4363 bfq_put_rq_priv_body(bfqq
);
4365 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4368 * Request rq may be still/already in the scheduler,
4369 * in which case we need to remove it. And we cannot
4370 * defer such a check and removal, to avoid
4371 * inconsistencies in the time interval from the end
4372 * of this function to the start of the deferred work.
4373 * This situation seems to occur only in process
4374 * context, as a consequence of a merge. In the
4375 * current version of the code, this implies that the
4379 if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&rq
->rb_node
))
4380 bfq_remove_request(rq
->q
, rq
);
4381 bfq_put_rq_priv_body(bfqq
);
4384 rq
->elv
.priv
[0] = NULL
;
4385 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = NULL
;
4389 * Returns NULL if a new bfqq should be allocated, or the old bfqq if this
4390 * was the last process referring to that bfqq.
4392 static struct bfq_queue
*
4393 bfq_split_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
, struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4395 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq
->bfqd
, bfqq
, "splitting queue");
4397 if (bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
) == 1) {
4398 bfqq
->pid
= current
->pid
;
4399 bfq_clear_bfqq_coop(bfqq
);
4400 bfq_clear_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
);
4404 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, NULL
, 1);
4406 bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq
);
4408 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4412 static struct bfq_queue
*bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
4413 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
,
4415 bool split
, bool is_sync
,
4418 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bic_to_bfqq(bic
, is_sync
);
4420 if (likely(bfqq
&& bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
))
4427 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4428 bfqq
= bfq_get_queue(bfqd
, bio
, is_sync
, bic
);
4430 bic_set_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
, is_sync
);
4431 if (split
&& is_sync
) {
4432 if ((bic
->was_in_burst_list
&& bfqd
->large_burst
) ||
4433 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
)
4434 bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
4436 bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
);
4437 if (bic
->was_in_burst_list
)
4438 hlist_add_head(&bfqq
->burst_list_node
,
4441 bfqq
->split_time
= jiffies
;
4448 * Allocate bfq data structures associated with this request.
4450 static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request
*rq
, struct bio
*bio
)
4452 struct request_queue
*q
= rq
->q
;
4453 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= q
->elevator
->elevator_data
;
4454 struct bfq_io_cq
*bic
;
4455 const int is_sync
= rq_is_sync(rq
);
4456 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
;
4457 bool new_queue
= false;
4458 bool bfqq_already_existing
= false, split
= false;
4461 * Even if we don't have an icq attached, we should still clear
4462 * the scheduler pointers, as they might point to previously
4463 * allocated bic/bfqq structs.
4466 rq
->elv
.priv
[0] = rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = NULL
;
4470 bic
= icq_to_bic(rq
->elv
.icq
);
4472 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4474 bfq_check_ioprio_change(bic
, bio
);
4476 bfq_bic_update_cgroup(bic
, bio
);
4478 bfqq
= bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd
, bic
, bio
, false, is_sync
,
4481 if (likely(!new_queue
)) {
4482 /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */
4483 if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq
) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq
)) {
4484 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "breaking apart bfqq");
4486 /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */
4487 if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq
))
4488 bic
->saved_in_large_burst
= true;
4490 bfqq
= bfq_split_bfqq(bic
, bfqq
);
4494 bfqq
= bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd
, bic
, bio
,
4498 bfqq_already_existing
= true;
4504 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "get_request %p: bfqq %p, %d",
4505 rq
, bfqq
, bfqq
->ref
);
4507 rq
->elv
.priv
[0] = bic
;
4508 rq
->elv
.priv
[1] = bfqq
;
4511 * If a bfq_queue has only one process reference, it is owned
4512 * by only this bic: we can then set bfqq->bic = bic. in
4513 * addition, if the queue has also just been split, we have to
4516 if (likely(bfqq
!= &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
) && bfqq_process_refs(bfqq
) == 1) {
4520 * The queue has just been split from a shared
4521 * queue: restore the idle window and the
4522 * possible weight raising period.
4524 bfq_bfqq_resume_state(bfqq
, bfqd
, bic
,
4525 bfqq_already_existing
);
4529 if (unlikely(bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq
)))
4530 bfq_handle_burst(bfqd
, bfqq
);
4532 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4535 static void bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
)
4537 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= bfqq
->bfqd
;
4538 enum bfqq_expiration reason
;
4539 unsigned long flags
;
4541 spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4542 bfq_clear_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq
);
4544 if (bfqq
!= bfqd
->in_service_queue
) {
4545 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4549 if (bfq_bfqq_budget_timeout(bfqq
))
4551 * Also here the queue can be safely expired
4552 * for budget timeout without wasting
4555 reason
= BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT
;
4556 else if (bfqq
->queued
[0] == 0 && bfqq
->queued
[1] == 0)
4558 * The queue may not be empty upon timer expiration,
4559 * because we may not disable the timer when the
4560 * first request of the in-service queue arrives
4561 * during disk idling.
4563 reason
= BFQQE_TOO_IDLE
;
4565 goto schedule_dispatch
;
4567 bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd
, bfqq
, true, reason
);
4570 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd
->lock
, flags
);
4571 bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd
);
4575 * Handler of the expiration of the timer running if the in-service queue
4576 * is idling inside its time slice.
4578 static enum hrtimer_restart
bfq_idle_slice_timer(struct hrtimer
*timer
)
4580 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= container_of(timer
, struct bfq_data
,
4582 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= bfqd
->in_service_queue
;
4585 * Theoretical race here: the in-service queue can be NULL or
4586 * different from the queue that was idling if a new request
4587 * arrives for the current queue and there is a full dispatch
4588 * cycle that changes the in-service queue. This can hardly
4589 * happen, but in the worst case we just expire a queue too
4593 bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(bfqq
);
4595 return HRTIMER_NORESTART
;
4598 static void __bfq_put_async_bfqq(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
,
4599 struct bfq_queue
**bfqq_ptr
)
4601 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
= *bfqq_ptr
;
4603 bfq_log(bfqd
, "put_async_bfqq: %p", bfqq
);
4605 bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd
, bfqq
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4607 bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, "put_async_bfqq: putting %p, %d",
4609 bfq_put_queue(bfqq
);
4615 * Release all the bfqg references to its async queues. If we are
4616 * deallocating the group these queues may still contain requests, so
4617 * we reparent them to the root cgroup (i.e., the only one that will
4618 * exist for sure until all the requests on a device are gone).
4620 void bfq_put_async_queues(struct bfq_data
*bfqd
, struct bfq_group
*bfqg
)
4624 for (i
= 0; i
< 2; i
++)
4625 for (j
= 0; j
< IOPRIO_BE_NR
; j
++)
4626 __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqg
->async_bfqq
[i
][j
]);
4628 __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqg
->async_idle_bfqq
);
4631 static void bfq_exit_queue(struct elevator_queue
*e
)
4633 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4634 struct bfq_queue
*bfqq
, *n
;
4636 hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4638 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4639 list_for_each_entry_safe(bfqq
, n
, &bfqd
->idle_list
, bfqq_list
)
4640 bfq_deactivate_bfqq(bfqd
, bfqq
, false, false);
4641 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4643 hrtimer_cancel(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
);
4645 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
4646 blkcg_deactivate_policy(bfqd
->queue
, &blkcg_policy_bfq
);
4648 spin_lock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4649 bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4650 kfree(bfqd
->root_group
);
4651 spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd
->lock
);
4657 static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group
*root_group
,
4658 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
)
4662 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
4663 root_group
->entity
.parent
= NULL
;
4664 root_group
->my_entity
= NULL
;
4665 root_group
->bfqd
= bfqd
;
4667 root_group
->rq_pos_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4668 for (i
= 0; i
< BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES
; i
++)
4669 root_group
->sched_data
.service_tree
[i
] = BFQ_SERVICE_TREE_INIT
;
4670 root_group
->sched_data
.bfq_class_idle_last_service
= jiffies
;
4673 static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue
*q
, struct elevator_type
*e
)
4675 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
;
4676 struct elevator_queue
*eq
;
4678 eq
= elevator_alloc(q
, e
);
4682 bfqd
= kzalloc_node(sizeof(*bfqd
), GFP_KERNEL
, q
->node
);
4684 kobject_put(&eq
->kobj
);
4687 eq
->elevator_data
= bfqd
;
4689 spin_lock_irq(q
->queue_lock
);
4691 spin_unlock_irq(q
->queue_lock
);
4694 * Our fallback bfqq if bfq_find_alloc_queue() runs into OOM issues.
4695 * Grab a permanent reference to it, so that the normal code flow
4696 * will not attempt to free it.
4698 bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd
, &bfqd
->oom_bfqq
, NULL
, 1, 0);
4699 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.ref
++;
4700 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio
= BFQ_DEFAULT_QUEUE_IOPRIO
;
4701 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio_class
= IOPRIO_CLASS_BE
;
4702 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
.new_weight
=
4703 bfq_ioprio_to_weight(bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.new_ioprio
);
4705 /* oom_bfqq does not participate to bursts */
4706 bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(&bfqd
->oom_bfqq
);
4709 * Trigger weight initialization, according to ioprio, at the
4710 * oom_bfqq's first activation. The oom_bfqq's ioprio and ioprio
4711 * class won't be changed any more.
4713 bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
.prio_changed
= 1;
4717 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->dispatch
);
4719 hrtimer_init(&bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
, CLOCK_MONOTONIC
,
4721 bfqd
->idle_slice_timer
.function
= bfq_idle_slice_timer
;
4723 bfqd
->queue_weights_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4724 bfqd
->group_weights_tree
= RB_ROOT
;
4726 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->active_list
);
4727 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->idle_list
);
4728 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&bfqd
->burst_list
);
4732 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_default_max_budget
;
4734 bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0] = bfq_fifo_expire
[0];
4735 bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1] = bfq_fifo_expire
[1];
4736 bfqd
->bfq_back_max
= bfq_back_max
;
4737 bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
= bfq_back_penalty
;
4738 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
= bfq_slice_idle
;
4739 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
= bfq_timeout
;
4741 bfqd
->bfq_requests_within_timer
= 120;
4743 bfqd
->bfq_large_burst_thresh
= 8;
4744 bfqd
->bfq_burst_interval
= msecs_to_jiffies(180);
4746 bfqd
->low_latency
= true;
4749 * Trade-off between responsiveness and fairness.
4751 bfqd
->bfq_wr_coeff
= 30;
4752 bfqd
->bfq_wr_rt_max_time
= msecs_to_jiffies(300);
4753 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_time
= 0;
4754 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_idle_time
= msecs_to_jiffies(2000);
4755 bfqd
->bfq_wr_min_inter_arr_async
= msecs_to_jiffies(500);
4756 bfqd
->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate
= 7000; /*
4757 * Approximate rate required
4758 * to playback or record a
4759 * high-definition compressed
4762 bfqd
->wr_busy_queues
= 0;
4765 * Begin by assuming, optimistically, that the device is a
4766 * high-speed one, and that its peak rate is equal to 2/3 of
4767 * the highest reference rate.
4769 bfqd
->RT_prod
= R_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)] *
4770 T_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)];
4771 bfqd
->peak_rate
= R_fast
[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd
->queue
)] * 2 / 3;
4772 bfqd
->device_speed
= BFQ_BFQD_FAST
;
4774 spin_lock_init(&bfqd
->lock
);
4777 * The invocation of the next bfq_create_group_hierarchy
4778 * function is the head of a chain of function calls
4779 * (bfq_create_group_hierarchy->blkcg_activate_policy->
4780 * blk_mq_freeze_queue) that may lead to the invocation of the
4781 * has_work hook function. For this reason,
4782 * bfq_create_group_hierarchy is invoked only after all
4783 * scheduler data has been initialized, apart from the fields
4784 * that can be initialized only after invoking
4785 * bfq_create_group_hierarchy. This, in particular, enables
4786 * has_work to correctly return false. Of course, to avoid
4787 * other inconsistencies, the blk-mq stack must then refrain
4788 * from invoking further scheduler hooks before this init
4789 * function is finished.
4791 bfqd
->root_group
= bfq_create_group_hierarchy(bfqd
, q
->node
);
4792 if (!bfqd
->root_group
)
4794 bfq_init_root_group(bfqd
->root_group
, bfqd
);
4795 bfq_init_entity(&bfqd
->oom_bfqq
.entity
, bfqd
->root_group
);
4797 wbt_disable_default(q
);
4802 kobject_put(&eq
->kobj
);
4806 static void bfq_slab_kill(void)
4808 kmem_cache_destroy(bfq_pool
);
4811 static int __init
bfq_slab_setup(void)
4813 bfq_pool
= KMEM_CACHE(bfq_queue
, 0);
4819 static ssize_t
bfq_var_show(unsigned int var
, char *page
)
4821 return sprintf(page
, "%u\n", var
);
4824 static int bfq_var_store(unsigned long *var
, const char *page
)
4826 unsigned long new_val
;
4827 int ret
= kstrtoul(page
, 10, &new_val
);
4835 #define SHOW_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __VAR, __CONV) \
4836 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, char *page) \
4838 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4839 u64 __data = __VAR; \
4841 __data = jiffies_to_msecs(__data); \
4842 else if (__CONV == 2) \
4843 __data = div_u64(__data, NSEC_PER_MSEC); \
4844 return bfq_var_show(__data, (page)); \
4846 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_sync_show
, bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1], 2);
4847 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_async_show
, bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0], 2);
4848 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_max_show
, bfqd
->bfq_back_max
, 0);
4849 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_penalty_show
, bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
, 0);
4850 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_show
, bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 2);
4851 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_max_budget_show
, bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
, 0);
4852 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_timeout_sync_show
, bfqd
->bfq_timeout
, 1);
4853 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_strict_guarantees_show
, bfqd
->strict_guarantees
, 0);
4854 SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_low_latency_show
, bfqd
->low_latency
, 0);
4855 #undef SHOW_FUNCTION
4857 #define USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __VAR) \
4858 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, char *page) \
4860 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4861 u64 __data = __VAR; \
4862 __data = div_u64(__data, NSEC_PER_USEC); \
4863 return bfq_var_show(__data, (page)); \
4865 USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_us_show
, bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
);
4866 #undef USEC_SHOW_FUNCTION
4868 #define STORE_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __PTR, MIN, MAX, __CONV) \
4870 __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, const char *page, size_t count) \
4872 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4873 unsigned long __data, __min = (MIN), __max = (MAX); \
4876 ret = bfq_var_store(&__data, (page)); \
4879 if (__data < __min) \
4881 else if (__data > __max) \
4884 *(__PTR) = msecs_to_jiffies(__data); \
4885 else if (__CONV == 2) \
4886 *(__PTR) = (u64)__data * NSEC_PER_MSEC; \
4888 *(__PTR) = __data; \
4891 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_sync_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[1], 1,
4893 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_fifo_expire_async_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_fifo_expire
[0], 1,
4895 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_max_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_back_max
, 0, INT_MAX
, 0);
4896 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_back_seek_penalty_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_back_penalty
, 1,
4898 STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 0, INT_MAX
, 2);
4899 #undef STORE_FUNCTION
4901 #define USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(__FUNC, __PTR, MIN, MAX) \
4902 static ssize_t __FUNC(struct elevator_queue *e, const char *page, size_t count)\
4904 struct bfq_data *bfqd = e->elevator_data; \
4905 unsigned long __data, __min = (MIN), __max = (MAX); \
4908 ret = bfq_var_store(&__data, (page)); \
4911 if (__data < __min) \
4913 else if (__data > __max) \
4915 *(__PTR) = (u64)__data * NSEC_PER_USEC; \
4918 USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(bfq_slice_idle_us_store
, &bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
, 0,
4920 #undef USEC_STORE_FUNCTION
4922 static ssize_t
bfq_max_budget_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4923 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4925 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4926 unsigned long __data
;
4929 ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
));
4934 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
4936 if (__data
> INT_MAX
)
4938 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= __data
;
4941 bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
= __data
;
4947 * Leaving this name to preserve name compatibility with cfq
4948 * parameters, but this timeout is used for both sync and async.
4950 static ssize_t
bfq_timeout_sync_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4951 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4953 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4954 unsigned long __data
;
4957 ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
));
4963 else if (__data
> INT_MAX
)
4966 bfqd
->bfq_timeout
= msecs_to_jiffies(__data
);
4967 if (bfqd
->bfq_user_max_budget
== 0)
4968 bfqd
->bfq_max_budget
= bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd
);
4973 static ssize_t
bfq_strict_guarantees_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4974 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4976 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4977 unsigned long __data
;
4980 ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
));
4986 if (!bfqd
->strict_guarantees
&& __data
== 1
4987 && bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
< 8 * NSEC_PER_MSEC
)
4988 bfqd
->bfq_slice_idle
= 8 * NSEC_PER_MSEC
;
4990 bfqd
->strict_guarantees
= __data
;
4995 static ssize_t
bfq_low_latency_store(struct elevator_queue
*e
,
4996 const char *page
, size_t count
)
4998 struct bfq_data
*bfqd
= e
->elevator_data
;
4999 unsigned long __data
;
5002 ret
= bfq_var_store(&__data
, (page
));
5008 if (__data
== 0 && bfqd
->low_latency
!= 0)
5010 bfqd
->low_latency
= __data
;
5015 #define BFQ_ATTR(name) \
5016 __ATTR(name, 0644, bfq_##name##_show, bfq_##name##_store)
5018 static struct elv_fs_entry bfq_attrs
[] = {
5019 BFQ_ATTR(fifo_expire_sync
),
5020 BFQ_ATTR(fifo_expire_async
),
5021 BFQ_ATTR(back_seek_max
),
5022 BFQ_ATTR(back_seek_penalty
),
5023 BFQ_ATTR(slice_idle
),
5024 BFQ_ATTR(slice_idle_us
),
5025 BFQ_ATTR(max_budget
),
5026 BFQ_ATTR(timeout_sync
),
5027 BFQ_ATTR(strict_guarantees
),
5028 BFQ_ATTR(low_latency
),
5032 static struct elevator_type iosched_bfq_mq
= {
5034 .prepare_request
= bfq_prepare_request
,
5035 .finish_request
= bfq_finish_request
,
5036 .exit_icq
= bfq_exit_icq
,
5037 .insert_requests
= bfq_insert_requests
,
5038 .dispatch_request
= bfq_dispatch_request
,
5039 .next_request
= elv_rb_latter_request
,
5040 .former_request
= elv_rb_former_request
,
5041 .allow_merge
= bfq_allow_bio_merge
,
5042 .bio_merge
= bfq_bio_merge
,
5043 .request_merge
= bfq_request_merge
,
5044 .requests_merged
= bfq_requests_merged
,
5045 .request_merged
= bfq_request_merged
,
5046 .has_work
= bfq_has_work
,
5047 .init_sched
= bfq_init_queue
,
5048 .exit_sched
= bfq_exit_queue
,
5052 .icq_size
= sizeof(struct bfq_io_cq
),
5053 .icq_align
= __alignof__(struct bfq_io_cq
),
5054 .elevator_attrs
= bfq_attrs
,
5055 .elevator_name
= "bfq",
5056 .elevator_owner
= THIS_MODULE
,
5058 MODULE_ALIAS("bfq-iosched");
5060 static int __init
bfq_init(void)
5064 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5065 ret
= blkcg_policy_register(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5071 if (bfq_slab_setup())
5075 * Times to load large popular applications for the typical
5076 * systems installed on the reference devices (see the
5077 * comments before the definitions of the next two
5078 * arrays). Actually, we use slightly slower values, as the
5079 * estimated peak rate tends to be smaller than the actual
5080 * peak rate. The reason for this last fact is that estimates
5081 * are computed over much shorter time intervals than the long
5082 * intervals typically used for benchmarking. Why? First, to
5083 * adapt more quickly to variations. Second, because an I/O
5084 * scheduler cannot rely on a peak-rate-evaluation workload to
5085 * be run for a long time.
5087 T_slow
[0] = msecs_to_jiffies(3500); /* actually 4 sec */
5088 T_slow
[1] = msecs_to_jiffies(6000); /* actually 6.5 sec */
5089 T_fast
[0] = msecs_to_jiffies(7000); /* actually 8 sec */
5090 T_fast
[1] = msecs_to_jiffies(2500); /* actually 3 sec */
5093 * Thresholds that determine the switch between speed classes
5094 * (see the comments before the definition of the array
5095 * device_speed_thresh). These thresholds are biased towards
5096 * transitions to the fast class. This is safer than the
5097 * opposite bias. In fact, a wrong transition to the slow
5098 * class results in short weight-raising periods, because the
5099 * speed of the device then tends to be higher that the
5100 * reference peak rate. On the opposite end, a wrong
5101 * transition to the fast class tends to increase
5102 * weight-raising periods, because of the opposite reason.
5104 device_speed_thresh
[0] = (4 * R_slow
[0]) / 3;
5105 device_speed_thresh
[1] = (4 * R_slow
[1]) / 3;
5107 ret
= elv_register(&iosched_bfq_mq
);
5116 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5117 blkcg_policy_unregister(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5122 static void __exit
bfq_exit(void)
5124 elv_unregister(&iosched_bfq_mq
);
5125 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
5126 blkcg_policy_unregister(&blkcg_policy_bfq
);
5131 module_init(bfq_init
);
5132 module_exit(bfq_exit
);
5134 MODULE_AUTHOR("Paolo Valente");
5135 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
5136 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MQ Budget Fair Queueing I/O Scheduler");