cgroup: annotate cgroup_init_subsys with __init

[linux-2.6/mini2440.git] / Documentation / cpusets.txt

                                CPUSETS
                                -------

Copyright (C) 2004 BULL SA.
Written by Simon.Derr@bull.net

Portions Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Modified by Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Modified by Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Modified by Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Modified by Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>

CONTENTS:
=========

1. Cpusets
  1.1 What are cpusets ?
  1.2 Why are cpusets needed ?
  1.3 How are cpusets implemented ?
  1.4 What are exclusive cpusets ?
  1.5 What is memory_pressure ?
  1.6 What is memory spread ?
  1.7 What is sched_load_balance ?
  1.8 What is sched_relax_domain_level ?
  1.9 How do I use cpusets ?
2. Usage Examples and Syntax
  2.1 Basic Usage
  2.2 Adding/removing cpus
  2.3 Setting flags
  2.4 Attaching processes
3. Questions
4. Contact

1. Cpusets
==========

1.1 What are cpusets ?
----------------------

Cpusets provide a mechanism for assigning a set of CPUs and Memory
Nodes to a set of tasks.   In this document "Memory Node" refers to
an on-line node that contains memory.

Cpusets constrain the CPU and Memory placement of tasks to only
the resources within a tasks current cpuset.  They form a nested
hierarchy visible in a virtual file system.  These are the essential
hooks, beyond what is already present, required to manage dynamic
job placement on large systems.

Cpusets use the generic cgroup subsystem described in
Documentation/cgroup.txt.

Requests by a task, using the sched_setaffinity(2) system call to
include CPUs in its CPU affinity mask, and using the mbind(2) and
set_mempolicy(2) system calls to include Memory Nodes in its memory
policy, are both filtered through that tasks cpuset, filtering out any
CPUs or Memory Nodes not in that cpuset.  The scheduler will not
schedule a task on a CPU that is not allowed in its cpus_allowed
vector, and the kernel page allocator will not allocate a page on a
node that is not allowed in the requesting tasks mems_allowed vector.

User level code may create and destroy cpusets by name in the cgroup
virtual file system, manage the attributes and permissions of these
cpusets and which CPUs and Memory Nodes are assigned to each cpuset,
specify and query to which cpuset a task is assigned, and list the
task pids assigned to a cpuset.


1.2 Why are cpusets needed ?
----------------------------

The management of large computer systems, with many processors (CPUs),
complex memory cache hierarchies and multiple Memory Nodes having
non-uniform access times (NUMA) presents additional challenges for
the efficient scheduling and memory placement of processes.

Frequently more modest sized systems can be operated with adequate
efficiency just by letting the operating system automatically share
the available CPU and Memory resources amongst the requesting tasks.

But larger systems, which benefit more from careful processor and
memory placement to reduce memory access times and contention,
and which typically represent a larger investment for the customer,
can benefit from explicitly placing jobs on properly sized subsets of
the system.

This can be especially valuable on:

    * Web Servers running multiple instances of the same web application,
    * Servers running different applications (for instance, a web server
      and a database), or
    * NUMA systems running large HPC applications with demanding
      performance characteristics.

These subsets, or "soft partitions" must be able to be dynamically
adjusted, as the job mix changes, without impacting other concurrently
executing jobs. The location of the running jobs pages may also be moved
when the memory locations are changed.

The kernel cpuset patch provides the minimum essential kernel
mechanisms required to efficiently implement such subsets.  It
leverages existing CPU and Memory Placement facilities in the Linux
kernel to avoid any additional impact on the critical scheduler or
memory allocator code.


1.3 How are cpusets implemented ?
---------------------------------

Cpusets provide a Linux kernel mechanism to constrain which CPUs and
Memory Nodes are used by a process or set of processes.

The Linux kernel already has a pair of mechanisms to specify on which
CPUs a task may be scheduled (sched_setaffinity) and on which Memory
Nodes it may obtain memory (mbind, set_mempolicy).

Cpusets extends these two mechanisms as follows:

 - Cpusets are sets of allowed CPUs and Memory Nodes, known to the
   kernel.
 - Each task in the system is attached to a cpuset, via a pointer
   in the task structure to a reference counted cgroup structure.
 - Calls to sched_setaffinity are filtered to just those CPUs
   allowed in that tasks cpuset.
 - Calls to mbind and set_mempolicy are filtered to just
   those Memory Nodes allowed in that tasks cpuset.
 - The root cpuset contains all the systems CPUs and Memory
   Nodes.
 - For any cpuset, one can define child cpusets containing a subset
   of the parents CPU and Memory Node resources.
 - The hierarchy of cpusets can be mounted at /dev/cpuset, for
   browsing and manipulation from user space.
 - A cpuset may be marked exclusive, which ensures that no other
   cpuset (except direct ancestors and descendents) may contain
   any overlapping CPUs or Memory Nodes.
 - You can list all the tasks (by pid) attached to any cpuset.

The implementation of cpusets requires a few, simple hooks
into the rest of the kernel, none in performance critical paths:

 - in init/main.c, to initialize the root cpuset at system boot.
 - in fork and exit, to attach and detach a task from its cpuset.
 - in sched_setaffinity, to mask the requested CPUs by what's
   allowed in that tasks cpuset.
 - in sched.c migrate_all_tasks(), to keep migrating tasks within
   the CPUs allowed by their cpuset, if possible.
 - in the mbind and set_mempolicy system calls, to mask the requested
   Memory Nodes by what's allowed in that tasks cpuset.
 - in page_alloc.c, to restrict memory to allowed nodes.
 - in vmscan.c, to restrict page recovery to the current cpuset.

You should mount the "cgroup" filesystem type in order to enable
browsing and modifying the cpusets presently known to the kernel.  No
new system calls are added for cpusets - all support for querying and
modifying cpusets is via this cpuset file system.

The /proc/<pid>/status file for each task has two added lines,
displaying the tasks cpus_allowed (on which CPUs it may be scheduled)
and mems_allowed (on which Memory Nodes it may obtain memory),
in the format seen in the following example:

  Cpus_allowed:   ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff
  Mems_allowed:   ffffffff,ffffffff

Each cpuset is represented by a directory in the cgroup file system
containing (on top of the standard cgroup files) the following
files describing that cpuset:

 - cpus: list of CPUs in that cpuset
 - mems: list of Memory Nodes in that cpuset
 - memory_migrate flag: if set, move pages to cpusets nodes
 - cpu_exclusive flag: is cpu placement exclusive?
 - mem_exclusive flag: is memory placement exclusive?
 - memory_pressure: measure of how much paging pressure in cpuset

In addition, the root cpuset only has the following file:
 - memory_pressure_enabled flag: compute memory_pressure?

New cpusets are created using the mkdir system call or shell
command.  The properties of a cpuset, such as its flags, allowed
CPUs and Memory Nodes, and attached tasks, are modified by writing
to the appropriate file in that cpusets directory, as listed above.

The named hierarchical structure of nested cpusets allows partitioning
a large system into nested, dynamically changeable, "soft-partitions".

The attachment of each task, automatically inherited at fork by any
children of that task, to a cpuset allows organizing the work load
on a system into related sets of tasks such that each set is constrained
to using the CPUs and Memory Nodes of a particular cpuset.  A task
may be re-attached to any other cpuset, if allowed by the permissions
on the necessary cpuset file system directories.

Such management of a system "in the large" integrates smoothly with
the detailed placement done on individual tasks and memory regions
using the sched_setaffinity, mbind and set_mempolicy system calls.

The following rules apply to each cpuset:

 - Its CPUs and Memory Nodes must be a subset of its parents.
 - It can only be marked exclusive if its parent is.
 - If its cpu or memory is exclusive, they may not overlap any sibling.

These rules, and the natural hierarchy of cpusets, enable efficient
enforcement of the exclusive guarantee, without having to scan all
cpusets every time any of them change to ensure nothing overlaps a
exclusive cpuset.  Also, the use of a Linux virtual file system (vfs)
to represent the cpuset hierarchy provides for a familiar permission
and name space for cpusets, with a minimum of additional kernel code.

The cpus and mems files in the root (top_cpuset) cpuset are
read-only.  The cpus file automatically tracks the value of
cpu_online_map using a CPU hotplug notifier, and the mems file
automatically tracks the value of node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]--i.e.,
nodes with memory--using the cpuset_track_online_nodes() hook.


1.4 What are exclusive cpusets ?
--------------------------------

If a cpuset is cpu or mem exclusive, no other cpuset, other than
a direct ancestor or descendent, may share any of the same CPUs or
Memory Nodes.

A cpuset that is mem_exclusive restricts kernel allocations for
page, buffer and other data commonly shared by the kernel across
multiple users.  All cpusets, whether mem_exclusive or not, restrict
allocations of memory for user space.  This enables configuring a
system so that several independent jobs can share common kernel data,
such as file system pages, while isolating each jobs user allocation in
its own cpuset.  To do this, construct a large mem_exclusive cpuset to
hold all the jobs, and construct child, non-mem_exclusive cpusets for
each individual job.  Only a small amount of typical kernel memory,
such as requests from interrupt handlers, is allowed to be taken
outside even a mem_exclusive cpuset.


1.5 What is memory_pressure ?
-----------------------------
The memory_pressure of a cpuset provides a simple per-cpuset metric
of the rate that the tasks in a cpuset are attempting to free up in
use memory on the nodes of the cpuset to satisfy additional memory
requests.

This enables batch managers monitoring jobs running in dedicated
cpusets to efficiently detect what level of memory pressure that job
is causing.

This is useful both on tightly managed systems running a wide mix of
submitted jobs, which may choose to terminate or re-prioritize jobs that
are trying to use more memory than allowed on the nodes assigned them,
and with tightly coupled, long running, massively parallel scientific
computing jobs that will dramatically fail to meet required performance
goals if they start to use more memory than allowed to them.

This mechanism provides a very economical way for the batch manager
to monitor a cpuset for signs of memory pressure.  It's up to the
batch manager or other user code to decide what to do about it and
take action.

==> Unless this feature is enabled by writing "1" to the special file
    /dev/cpuset/memory_pressure_enabled, the hook in the rebalance
    code of __alloc_pages() for this metric reduces to simply noticing
    that the cpuset_memory_pressure_enabled flag is zero.  So only
    systems that enable this feature will compute the metric.

Why a per-cpuset, running average:

    Because this meter is per-cpuset, rather than per-task or mm,
    the system load imposed by a batch scheduler monitoring this
    metric is sharply reduced on large systems, because a scan of
    the tasklist can be avoided on each set of queries.

    Because this meter is a running average, instead of an accumulating
    counter, a batch scheduler can detect memory pressure with a
    single read, instead of having to read and accumulate results
    for a period of time.

    Because this meter is per-cpuset rather than per-task or mm,
    the batch scheduler can obtain the key information, memory
    pressure in a cpuset, with a single read, rather than having to
    query and accumulate results over all the (dynamically changing)
    set of tasks in the cpuset.

A per-cpuset simple digital filter (requires a spinlock and 3 words
of data per-cpuset) is kept, and updated by any task attached to that
cpuset, if it enters the synchronous (direct) page reclaim code.

A per-cpuset file provides an integer number representing the recent
(half-life of 10 seconds) rate of direct page reclaims caused by
the tasks in the cpuset, in units of reclaims attempted per second,
times 1000.


1.6 What is memory spread ?
---------------------------
There are two boolean flag files per cpuset that control where the
kernel allocates pages for the file system buffers and related in
kernel data structures.  They are called 'memory_spread_page' and
'memory_spread_slab'.

If the per-cpuset boolean flag file 'memory_spread_page' is set, then
the kernel will spread the file system buffers (page cache) evenly
over all the nodes that the faulting task is allowed to use, instead
of preferring to put those pages on the node where the task is running.

If the per-cpuset boolean flag file 'memory_spread_slab' is set,
then the kernel will spread some file system related slab caches,
such as for inodes and dentries evenly over all the nodes that the
faulting task is allowed to use, instead of preferring to put those
pages on the node where the task is running.

The setting of these flags does not affect anonymous data segment or
stack segment pages of a task.

By default, both kinds of memory spreading are off, and memory
pages are allocated on the node local to where the task is running,
except perhaps as modified by the tasks NUMA mempolicy or cpuset
configuration, so long as sufficient free memory pages are available.

When new cpusets are created, they inherit the memory spread settings
of their parent.

Setting memory spreading causes allocations for the affected page
or slab caches to ignore the tasks NUMA mempolicy and be spread
instead.    Tasks using mbind() or set_mempolicy() calls to set NUMA
mempolicies will not notice any change in these calls as a result of
their containing tasks memory spread settings.  If memory spreading
is turned off, then the currently specified NUMA mempolicy once again
applies to memory page allocations.

Both 'memory_spread_page' and 'memory_spread_slab' are boolean flag
files.  By default they contain "0", meaning that the feature is off
for that cpuset.  If a "1" is written to that file, then that turns
the named feature on.

The implementation is simple.

Setting the flag 'memory_spread_page' turns on a per-process flag
PF_SPREAD_PAGE for each task that is in that cpuset or subsequently
joins that cpuset.  The page allocation calls for the page cache
is modified to perform an inline check for this PF_SPREAD_PAGE task
flag, and if set, a call to a new routine cpuset_mem_spread_node()
returns the node to prefer for the allocation.

Similarly, setting 'memory_spread_cache' turns on the flag
PF_SPREAD_SLAB, and appropriately marked slab caches will allocate
pages from the node returned by cpuset_mem_spread_node().

The cpuset_mem_spread_node() routine is also simple.  It uses the
value of a per-task rotor cpuset_mem_spread_rotor to select the next
node in the current tasks mems_allowed to prefer for the allocation.

This memory placement policy is also known (in other contexts) as
round-robin or interleave.

This policy can provide substantial improvements for jobs that need
to place thread local data on the corresponding node, but that need
to access large file system data sets that need to be spread across
the several nodes in the jobs cpuset in order to fit.  Without this
policy, especially for jobs that might have one thread reading in the
data set, the memory allocation across the nodes in the jobs cpuset
can become very uneven.

1.7 What is sched_load_balance ?
--------------------------------

The kernel scheduler (kernel/sched.c) automatically load balances
tasks.  If one CPU is underutilized, kernel code running on that
CPU will look for tasks on other more overloaded CPUs and move those
tasks to itself, within the constraints of such placement mechanisms
as cpusets and sched_setaffinity.

The algorithmic cost of load balancing and its impact on key shared
kernel data structures such as the task list increases more than
linearly with the number of CPUs being balanced.  So the scheduler
has support to  partition the systems CPUs into a number of sched
domains such that it only load balances within each sched domain.
Each sched domain covers some subset of the CPUs in the system;
no two sched domains overlap; some CPUs might not be in any sched
domain and hence won't be load balanced.

Put simply, it costs less to balance between two smaller sched domains
than one big one, but doing so means that overloads in one of the
two domains won't be load balanced to the other one.

By default, there is one sched domain covering all CPUs, except those
marked isolated using the kernel boot time "isolcpus=" argument.

This default load balancing across all CPUs is not well suited for
the following two situations:
 1) On large systems, load balancing across many CPUs is expensive.
    If the system is managed using cpusets to place independent jobs
    on separate sets of CPUs, full load balancing is unnecessary.
 2) Systems supporting realtime on some CPUs need to minimize
    system overhead on those CPUs, including avoiding task load
    balancing if that is not needed.

When the per-cpuset flag "sched_load_balance" is enabled (the default
setting), it requests that all the CPUs in that cpusets allowed 'cpus'
be contained in a single sched domain, ensuring that load balancing
can move a task (not otherwised pinned, as by sched_setaffinity)
from any CPU in that cpuset to any other.

When the per-cpuset flag "sched_load_balance" is disabled, then the
scheduler will avoid load balancing across the CPUs in that cpuset,
--except-- in so far as is necessary because some overlapping cpuset
has "sched_load_balance" enabled.

So, for example, if the top cpuset has the flag "sched_load_balance"
enabled, then the scheduler will have one sched domain covering all
CPUs, and the setting of the "sched_load_balance" flag in any other
cpusets won't matter, as we're already fully load balancing.

Therefore in the above two situations, the top cpuset flag
"sched_load_balance" should be disabled, and only some of the smaller,
child cpusets have this flag enabled.

When doing this, you don't usually want to leave any unpinned tasks in
the top cpuset that might use non-trivial amounts of CPU, as such tasks
may be artificially constrained to some subset of CPUs, depending on
the particulars of this flag setting in descendent cpusets.  Even if
such a task could use spare CPU cycles in some other CPUs, the kernel
scheduler might not consider the possibility of load balancing that
task to that underused CPU.

Of course, tasks pinned to a particular CPU can be left in a cpuset
that disables "sched_load_balance" as those tasks aren't going anywhere
else anyway.

There is an impedance mismatch here, between cpusets and sched domains.
Cpusets are hierarchical and nest.  Sched domains are flat; they don't
overlap and each CPU is in at most one sched domain.

It is necessary for sched domains to be flat because load balancing
across partially overlapping sets of CPUs would risk unstable dynamics
that would be beyond our understanding.  So if each of two partially
overlapping cpusets enables the flag 'sched_load_balance', then we
form a single sched domain that is a superset of both.  We won't move
a task to a CPU outside it cpuset, but the scheduler load balancing
code might waste some compute cycles considering that possibility.

This mismatch is why there is not a simple one-to-one relation
between which cpusets have the flag "sched_load_balance" enabled,
and the sched domain configuration.  If a cpuset enables the flag, it
will get balancing across all its CPUs, but if it disables the flag,
it will only be assured of no load balancing if no other overlapping
cpuset enables the flag.

If two cpusets have partially overlapping 'cpus' allowed, and only
one of them has this flag enabled, then the other may find its
tasks only partially load balanced, just on the overlapping CPUs.
This is just the general case of the top_cpuset example given a few
paragraphs above.  In the general case, as in the top cpuset case,
don't leave tasks that might use non-trivial amounts of CPU in
such partially load balanced cpusets, as they may be artificially
constrained to some subset of the CPUs allowed to them, for lack of
load balancing to the other CPUs.

1.7.1 sched_load_balance implementation details.
------------------------------------------------

The per-cpuset flag 'sched_load_balance' defaults to enabled (contrary
to most cpuset flags.)  When enabled for a cpuset, the kernel will
ensure that it can load balance across all the CPUs in that cpuset
(makes sure that all the CPUs in the cpus_allowed of that cpuset are
in the same sched domain.)

If two overlapping cpusets both have 'sched_load_balance' enabled,
then they will be (must be) both in the same sched domain.

If, as is the default, the top cpuset has 'sched_load_balance' enabled,
then by the above that means there is a single sched domain covering
the whole system, regardless of any other cpuset settings.

The kernel commits to user space that it will avoid load balancing
where it can.  It will pick as fine a granularity partition of sched
domains as it can while still providing load balancing for any set
of CPUs allowed to a cpuset having 'sched_load_balance' enabled.

The internal kernel cpuset to scheduler interface passes from the
cpuset code to the scheduler code a partition of the load balanced
CPUs in the system. This partition is a set of subsets (represented
as an array of cpumask_t) of CPUs, pairwise disjoint, that cover all
the CPUs that must be load balanced.

Whenever the 'sched_load_balance' flag changes, or CPUs come or go
from a cpuset with this flag enabled, or a cpuset with this flag
enabled is removed, the cpuset code builds a new such partition and
passes it to the scheduler sched domain setup code, to have the sched
domains rebuilt as necessary.

This partition exactly defines what sched domains the scheduler should
setup - one sched domain for each element (cpumask_t) in the partition.

The scheduler remembers the currently active sched domain partitions.
When the scheduler routine partition_sched_domains() is invoked from
the cpuset code to update these sched domains, it compares the new
partition requested with the current, and updates its sched domains,
removing the old and adding the new, for each change.


1.8 What is sched_relax_domain_level ?
--------------------------------------

In sched domain, the scheduler migrates tasks in 2 ways; periodic load
balance on tick, and at time of some schedule events.

When a task is woken up, scheduler try to move the task on idle CPU.
For example, if a task A running on CPU X activates another task B
on the same CPU X, and if CPU Y is X's sibling and performing idle,
then scheduler migrate task B to CPU Y so that task B can start on
CPU Y without waiting task A on CPU X.

And if a CPU run out of tasks in its runqueue, the CPU try to pull
extra tasks from other busy CPUs to help them before it is going to
be idle.

Of course it takes some searching cost to find movable tasks and/or
idle CPUs, the scheduler might not search all CPUs in the domain
everytime.  In fact, in some architectures, the searching ranges on
events are limited in the same socket or node where the CPU locates,
while the load balance on tick searchs all.

For example, assume CPU Z is relatively far from CPU X.  Even if CPU Z
is idle while CPU X and the siblings are busy, scheduler can't migrate
woken task B from X to Z since it is out of its searching range.
As the result, task B on CPU X need to wait task A or wait load balance
on the next tick.  For some applications in special situation, waiting
1 tick may be too long.

The 'sched_relax_domain_level' file allows you to request changing
this searching range as you like.  This file takes int value which
indicates size of searching range in levels ideally as follows,
otherwise initial value -1 that indicates the cpuset has no request.

  -1  : no request. use system default or follow request of others.
   0  : no search.
   1  : search siblings (hyperthreads in a core).
   2  : search cores in a package.
   3  : search cpus in a node [= system wide on non-NUMA system]
 ( 4  : search nodes in a chunk of node [on NUMA system] )
 ( 5~ : search system wide [on NUMA system])

This file is per-cpuset and affect the sched domain where the cpuset
belongs to.  Therefore if the flag 'sched_load_balance' of a cpuset
is disabled, then 'sched_relax_domain_level' have no effect since
there is no sched domain belonging the cpuset.

If multiple cpusets are overlapping and hence they form a single sched
domain, the largest value among those is used.  Be careful, if one
requests 0 and others are -1 then 0 is used.

Note that modifying this file will have both good and bad effects,
and whether it is acceptable or not will be depend on your situation.
Don't modify this file if you are not sure.

If your situation is:
 - The migration costs between each cpu can be assumed considerably
   small(for you) due to your special application's behavior or
   special hardware support for CPU cache etc.
 - The searching cost doesn't have impact(for you) or you can make
   the searching cost enough small by managing cpuset to compact etc.
 - The latency is required even it sacrifices cache hit rate etc.
then increasing 'sched_relax_domain_level' would benefit you.


1.9 How do I use cpusets ?
--------------------------

In order to minimize the impact of cpusets on critical kernel
code, such as the scheduler, and due to the fact that the kernel
does not support one task updating the memory placement of another
task directly, the impact on a task of changing its cpuset CPU
or Memory Node placement, or of changing to which cpuset a task
is attached, is subtle.

If a cpuset has its Memory Nodes modified, then for each task attached
to that cpuset, the next time that the kernel attempts to allocate
a page of memory for that task, the kernel will notice the change
in the tasks cpuset, and update its per-task memory placement to
remain within the new cpusets memory placement.  If the task was using
mempolicy MPOL_BIND, and the nodes to which it was bound overlap with
its new cpuset, then the task will continue to use whatever subset
of MPOL_BIND nodes are still allowed in the new cpuset.  If the task
was using MPOL_BIND and now none of its MPOL_BIND nodes are allowed
in the new cpuset, then the task will be essentially treated as if it
was MPOL_BIND bound to the new cpuset (even though its numa placement,
as queried by get_mempolicy(), doesn't change).  If a task is moved
from one cpuset to another, then the kernel will adjust the tasks
memory placement, as above, the next time that the kernel attempts
to allocate a page of memory for that task.

If a cpuset has its 'cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset
will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately.  Similarly,
if a tasks pid is written to a cpusets 'tasks' file, in either its
current cpuset or another cpuset, then its allowed CPU placement is
changed immediately.  If such a task had been bound to some subset
of its cpuset using the sched_setaffinity() call, the task will be
allowed to run on any CPU allowed in its new cpuset, negating the
affect of the prior sched_setaffinity() call.

In summary, the memory placement of a task whose cpuset is changed is
updated by the kernel, on the next allocation of a page for that task,
but the processor placement is not updated, until that tasks pid is
rewritten to the 'tasks' file of its cpuset.  This is done to avoid
impacting the scheduler code in the kernel with a check for changes
in a tasks processor placement.

Normally, once a page is allocated (given a physical page
of main memory) then that page stays on whatever node it
was allocated, so long as it remains allocated, even if the
cpusets memory placement policy 'mems' subsequently changes.
If the cpuset flag file 'memory_migrate' is set true, then when
tasks are attached to that cpuset, any pages that task had
allocated to it on nodes in its previous cpuset are migrated
to the tasks new cpuset. The relative placement of the page within
the cpuset is preserved during these migration operations if possible.
For example if the page was on the second valid node of the prior cpuset
then the page will be placed on the second valid node of the new cpuset.

Also if 'memory_migrate' is set true, then if that cpusets
'mems' file is modified, pages allocated to tasks in that
cpuset, that were on nodes in the previous setting of 'mems',
will be moved to nodes in the new setting of 'mems.'
Pages that were not in the tasks prior cpuset, or in the cpusets
prior 'mems' setting, will not be moved.

There is an exception to the above.  If hotplug functionality is used
to remove all the CPUs that are currently assigned to a cpuset,
then the kernel will automatically update the cpus_allowed of all
tasks attached to CPUs in that cpuset to allow all CPUs.  When memory
hotplug functionality for removing Memory Nodes is available, a
similar exception is expected to apply there as well.  In general,
the kernel prefers to violate cpuset placement, over starving a task
that has had all its allowed CPUs or Memory Nodes taken offline.  User
code should reconfigure cpusets to only refer to online CPUs and Memory
Nodes when using hotplug to add or remove such resources.

There is a second exception to the above.  GFP_ATOMIC requests are
kernel internal allocations that must be satisfied, immediately.
The kernel may drop some request, in rare cases even panic, if a
GFP_ATOMIC alloc fails.  If the request cannot be satisfied within
the current tasks cpuset, then we relax the cpuset, and look for
memory anywhere we can find it.  It's better to violate the cpuset
than stress the kernel.

To start a new job that is to be contained within a cpuset, the steps are:

 1) mkdir /dev/cpuset
 2) mount -t cgroup -ocpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
 3) Create the new cpuset by doing mkdir's and write's (or echo's) in
    the /dev/cpuset virtual file system.
 4) Start a task that will be the "founding father" of the new job.
 5) Attach that task to the new cpuset by writing its pid to the
    /dev/cpuset tasks file for that cpuset.
 6) fork, exec or clone the job tasks from this founding father task.

For example, the following sequence of commands will setup a cpuset
named "Charlie", containing just CPUs 2 and 3, and Memory Node 1,
and then start a subshell 'sh' in that cpuset:

  mount -t cgroup -ocpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
  cd /dev/cpuset
  mkdir Charlie
  cd Charlie
  /bin/echo 2-3 > cpus
  /bin/echo 1 > mems
  /bin/echo $$ > tasks
  sh
  # The subshell 'sh' is now running in cpuset Charlie
  # The next line should display '/Charlie'
  cat /proc/self/cpuset

In the future, a C library interface to cpusets will likely be
available.  For now, the only way to query or modify cpusets is
via the cpuset file system, using the various cd, mkdir, echo, cat,
rmdir commands from the shell, or their equivalent from C.

The sched_setaffinity calls can also be done at the shell prompt using
SGI's runon or Robert Love's taskset.  The mbind and set_mempolicy
calls can be done at the shell prompt using the numactl command
(part of Andi Kleen's numa package).

2. Usage Examples and Syntax
============================

2.1 Basic Usage
---------------

Creating, modifying, using the cpusets can be done through the cpuset
virtual filesystem.

To mount it, type:
# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset

Then under /dev/cpuset you can find a tree that corresponds to the
tree of the cpusets in the system. For instance, /dev/cpuset
is the cpuset that holds the whole system.

If you want to create a new cpuset under /dev/cpuset:
# cd /dev/cpuset
# mkdir my_cpuset

Now you want to do something with this cpuset.
# cd my_cpuset

In this directory you can find several files:
# ls
cpus  cpu_exclusive  mems  mem_exclusive  tasks

Reading them will give you information about the state of this cpuset:
the CPUs and Memory Nodes it can use, the processes that are using
it, its properties.  By writing to these files you can manipulate
the cpuset.

Set some flags:
# /bin/echo 1 > cpu_exclusive

Add some cpus:
# /bin/echo 0-7 > cpus

Add some mems:
# /bin/echo 0-7 > mems

Now attach your shell to this cpuset:
# /bin/echo $$ > tasks

You can also create cpusets inside your cpuset by using mkdir in this
directory.
# mkdir my_sub_cs

To remove a cpuset, just use rmdir:
# rmdir my_sub_cs
This will fail if the cpuset is in use (has cpusets inside, or has
processes attached).

Note that for legacy reasons, the "cpuset" filesystem exists as a
wrapper around the cgroup filesystem.

The command

mount -t cpuset X /dev/cpuset

is equivalent to

mount -t cgroup -ocpuset X /dev/cpuset
echo "/sbin/cpuset_release_agent" > /dev/cpuset/release_agent

2.2 Adding/removing cpus
------------------------

This is the syntax to use when writing in the cpus or mems files
in cpuset directories:

# /bin/echo 1-4 > cpus          -> set cpus list to cpus 1,2,3,4
# /bin/echo 1,2,3,4 > cpus      -> set cpus list to cpus 1,2,3,4

2.3 Setting flags
-----------------

The syntax is very simple:

# /bin/echo 1 > cpu_exclusive   -> set flag 'cpu_exclusive'
# /bin/echo 0 > cpu_exclusive   -> unset flag 'cpu_exclusive'

2.4 Attaching processes
-----------------------

# /bin/echo PID > tasks

Note that it is PID, not PIDs. You can only attach ONE task at a time.
If you have several tasks to attach, you have to do it one after another:

# /bin/echo PID1 > tasks
# /bin/echo PID2 > tasks
        ...
# /bin/echo PIDn > tasks


3. Questions
============

Q: what's up with this '/bin/echo' ?
A: bash's builtin 'echo' command does not check calls to write() against
   errors. If you use it in the cpuset file system, you won't be
   able to tell whether a command succeeded or failed.

Q: When I attach processes, only the first of the line gets really attached !
A: We can only return one error code per call to write(). So you should also
   put only ONE pid.

4. Contact
==========

Web: http://www.bullopensource.org/cpuset