1 Memory Resource Controller
3 NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred
4 to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller
5 used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
9 a. Enable control of Anonymous, Page Cache (mapped and unmapped) and
10 Swap Cache memory pages.
11 b. The infrastructure allows easy addition of other types of memory to control
12 c. Provides *zero overhead* for non memory controller users
13 d. Provides a double LRU: global memory pressure causes reclaim from the
14 global LRU; a cgroup on hitting a limit, reclaims from the per
17 Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller
19 The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks
20 from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable
21 uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to
23 a. Isolate an application or a group of applications
24 Memory hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller
26 b. Create a cgroup with limited amount of memory, this can be used
27 as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX.
28 c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want
29 to assign to a virtual machine instance.
30 d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the
31 rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack
33 e. There are several other use cases, find one or use the controller just
34 for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem).
38 The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory
39 controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted
40 there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the
41 RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required
42 for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2]
43 in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the
44 RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested
45 that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised
46 to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is
47 at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page
52 Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited
53 amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread
54 its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with
55 memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task.
57 The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These
61 2. mlock(2) controller
62 3. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control
63 4. user mappings length controller
65 The memory controller is the first controller developed.
69 The core of the design is a counter called the res_counter. The res_counter
70 tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of processes associated
71 with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller specific data
72 structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it.
76 +--------------------+
79 +--------------------+
82 +---------------+ | +---------------+
83 | mm_struct | |.... | mm_struct |
85 +---------------+ | +---------------+
89 +---------------+ +------+--------+
90 | page +----------> page_cgroup|
92 +---------------+ +---------------+
94 (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting)
97 Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller
99 1. Accounting happens per cgroup
100 2. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to
101 3. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the
104 The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge() is invoked to setup
105 the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being charged
106 is over its limit. If it is then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup.
107 More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document.
108 If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is
109 allocated and associated with the page. This routine also adds the page to
112 2.2.1 Accounting details
114 All mapped anon pages (RSS) and cache pages (Page Cache) are accounted.
115 (some pages which never be reclaimable and will not be on global LRU
116 are not accounted. we just accounts pages under usual vm management.)
118 RSS pages are accounted at page_fault unless they've already been accounted
119 for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache when it's
120 inserted into inode (radix-tree). While it's mapped into the page tables of
121 processes, duplicate accounting is carefully avoided.
123 A RSS page is unaccounted when it's fully unmapped. A PageCache page is
124 unaccounted when it's removed from radix-tree.
126 At page migration, accounting information is kept.
128 Note: we just account pages-on-lru because our purpose is to control amount
129 of used pages. not-on-lru pages are tend to be out-of-control from vm view.
131 2.3 Shared Page Accounting
133 Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The
134 cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle
135 behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared
136 page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
137 the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).
139 Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used..
140 When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to
141 be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the
142 caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem.
145 2.4 Swap Extension (CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP)
146 Swap Extension allows you to record charge for swap. A swapped-in page is
147 charged back to original page allocator if possible.
149 When swap is accounted, following files are added.
150 - memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes.
151 - memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes.
153 usage of mem+swap is limited by memsw.limit_in_bytes.
155 Note: why 'mem+swap' rather than swap.
156 The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means
157 to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of
160 In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without affecting
161 global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from OS point
166 Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active
167 and inactive list. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try
168 to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new
169 pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful,
170 an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the
173 The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that
174 pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per cgroup LRU
179 The memory controller uses the following hierarchy
181 1. zone->lru_lock is used for selecting pages to be isolated
182 2. mem->per_zone->lru_lock protects the per cgroup LRU (per zone)
183 3. lock_page_cgroup() is used to protect page->page_cgroup
189 a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS
190 b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS
191 c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
193 1. Prepare the cgroups
195 # mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory
197 2. Make the new group and move bash into it
199 # echo $$ > /cgroups/0/tasks
201 Since now we're in the 0 cgroup,
202 We can alter the memory limit:
203 # echo 4M > /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
205 NOTE: We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo,
208 # cat /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
211 NOTE: The interface has now changed to display the usage in bytes
214 We can check the usage:
215 # cat /cgroups/0/memory.usage_in_bytes
218 A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful set of
219 this limit to the value written into the file. This can be due to a
220 number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total
221 availability of memory on the system. The user is required to re-read
222 this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel.
224 # echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes
225 # cat memory.limit_in_bytes
228 The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was
231 The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of
232 caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown.
236 Balbir posted lmbench, AIM9, LTP and vmmstress results [10] and [11].
237 Apart from that v6 has been tested with several applications and regular
238 daily use. The controller has also been tested on the PPC64, x86_64 and
243 Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is
244 terminated. There are several causes for this:
246 1. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful)
247 2. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low
249 A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of
250 some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages).
254 When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, it's charge is not
255 carried forward. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still
256 remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or
259 4.3 Removing a cgroup
261 A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a
262 cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all
263 tasks have migrated away from it.
264 Such charges are freed(at default) or moved to its parent. When moved,
265 both of RSS and CACHES are moved to parent.
266 If both of them are busy, rmdir() returns -EBUSY. See 5.1 Also.
268 Charges recorded in swap information is not updated at removal of cgroup.
269 Recorded information is discarded and a cgroup which uses swap (swapcache)
270 will be charged as a new owner of it.
276 memory.force_empty interface is provided to make cgroup's memory usage empty.
277 You can use this interface only when the cgroup has no tasks.
278 When writing anything to this
280 # echo 0 > memory.force_empty
282 Almost all pages tracked by this memcg will be unmapped and freed. Some of
283 pages cannot be freed because it's locked or in-use. Such pages are moved
284 to parent and this cgroup will be empty. But this may return -EBUSY in
287 Typical use case of this interface is that calling this before rmdir().
288 Because rmdir() moves all pages to parent, some out-of-use page caches can be
289 moved to the parent. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful.
293 memory.stat file includes following statistics
295 cache - # of bytes of page cache memory.
296 rss - # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory.
297 pgpgin - # of pages paged in (equivalent to # of charging events).
298 pgpgout - # of pages paged out (equivalent to # of uncharging events).
299 active_anon - # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory on active
301 inactive_anon - # of bytes of anonymous memory and swap cache memory on
303 active_file - # of bytes of file-backed memory on active lru list.
304 inactive_file - # of bytes of file-backed memory on inactive lru list.
305 unevictable - # of bytes of memory that cannot be reclaimed (mlocked etc).
307 The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.
309 inactive_ratio - VM internal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c)
310 recent_rotated_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
311 recent_rotated_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
312 recent_scanned_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
313 recent_scanned_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
316 recent_rotated means recent frequency of lru rotation.
317 recent_scanned means recent # of scans to lru.
318 showing for better debug please see the code for meanings.
321 Only anonymous and swap cache memory is listed as part of 'rss' stat.
322 This should not be confused with the true 'resident set size' or the
323 amount of physical memory used by the cgroup. Per-cgroup rss
324 accounting is not done yet.
327 Similar to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but affecting a hierarchy of groups only.
329 Following cgroups' swapiness can't be changed.
330 - root cgroup (uses /proc/sys/vm/swappiness).
331 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and it has child cgroup.
332 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and not the root of hierarchy.
337 The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting.
338 The hierarchy is created by creating the appropriate cgroups in the
339 cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem
350 In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory
351 usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root),
352 that has memory.use_hierarchy enabled. If one of the ancestors goes over its
353 limit, the reclaim algorithm reclaims from the tasks in the ancestor and the
354 children of the ancestor.
356 6.1 Enabling hierarchical accounting and reclaim
358 The memory controller by default disables the hierarchy feature. Support
359 can be enabled by writing 1 to memory.use_hierarchy file of the root cgroup
361 # echo 1 > memory.use_hierarchy
363 The feature can be disabled by
365 # echo 0 > memory.use_hierarchy
367 NOTE1: Enabling/disabling will fail if the cgroup already has other
368 cgroups created below it.
370 NOTE2: This feature can be enabled/disabled per subtree.
374 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
375 2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
376 3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
377 4. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
378 not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
382 Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been
383 commented and discussed quite extensively in the community.
387 1. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/
388 2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control),
389 http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/
390 3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups
391 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198
392 4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2)
393 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78
394 5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3)
395 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244
396 6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/
397 7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control
398 subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/
399 8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench),
400 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232
401 9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results
402 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1
403 10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results,
404 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36
405 11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6),
406 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69
407 12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups,
408 http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/