1 Scaling in the Linux Networking Stack
7 This document describes a set of complementary techniques in the Linux
8 networking stack to increase parallelism and improve performance for
9 multi-processor systems.
11 The following technologies are described:
13 RSS: Receive Side Scaling
14 RPS: Receive Packet Steering
15 RFS: Receive Flow Steering
16 Accelerated Receive Flow Steering
17 XPS: Transmit Packet Steering
20 RSS: Receive Side Scaling
21 =========================
23 Contemporary NICs support multiple receive and transmit descriptor queues
24 (multi-queue). On reception, a NIC can send different packets to different
25 queues to distribute processing among CPUs. The NIC distributes packets by
26 applying a filter to each packet that assigns it to one of a small number
27 of logical flows. Packets for each flow are steered to a separate receive
28 queue, which in turn can be processed by separate CPUs. This mechanism is
29 generally known as “Receive-side Scaling” (RSS). The goal of RSS and
30 the other scaling techniques is to increase performance uniformly.
31 Multi-queue distribution can also be used for traffic prioritization, but
32 that is not the focus of these techniques.
34 The filter used in RSS is typically a hash function over the network
35 and/or transport layer headers-- for example, a 4-tuple hash over
36 IP addresses and TCP ports of a packet. The most common hardware
37 implementation of RSS uses a 128-entry indirection table where each entry
38 stores a queue number. The receive queue for a packet is determined
39 by masking out the low order seven bits of the computed hash for the
40 packet (usually a Toeplitz hash), taking this number as a key into the
41 indirection table and reading the corresponding value.
43 Some advanced NICs allow steering packets to queues based on
44 programmable filters. For example, webserver bound TCP port 80 packets
45 can be directed to their own receive queue. Such “n-tuple” filters can
46 be configured from ethtool (--config-ntuple).
48 ==== RSS Configuration
50 The driver for a multi-queue capable NIC typically provides a kernel
51 module parameter for specifying the number of hardware queues to
52 configure. In the bnx2x driver, for instance, this parameter is called
53 num_queues. A typical RSS configuration would be to have one receive queue
54 for each CPU if the device supports enough queues, or otherwise at least
55 one for each memory domain, where a memory domain is a set of CPUs that
56 share a particular memory level (L1, L2, NUMA node, etc.).
58 The indirection table of an RSS device, which resolves a queue by masked
59 hash, is usually programmed by the driver at initialization. The
60 default mapping is to distribute the queues evenly in the table, but the
61 indirection table can be retrieved and modified at runtime using ethtool
62 commands (--show-rxfh-indir and --set-rxfh-indir). Modifying the
63 indirection table could be done to give different queues different
66 == RSS IRQ Configuration
68 Each receive queue has a separate IRQ associated with it. The NIC triggers
69 this to notify a CPU when new packets arrive on the given queue. The
70 signaling path for PCIe devices uses message signaled interrupts (MSI-X),
71 that can route each interrupt to a particular CPU. The active mapping
72 of queues to IRQs can be determined from /proc/interrupts. By default,
73 an IRQ may be handled on any CPU. Because a non-negligible part of packet
74 processing takes place in receive interrupt handling, it is advantageous
75 to spread receive interrupts between CPUs. To manually adjust the IRQ
76 affinity of each interrupt see Documentation/IRQ-affinity.txt. Some systems
77 will be running irqbalance, a daemon that dynamically optimizes IRQ
78 assignments and as a result may override any manual settings.
80 == Suggested Configuration
82 RSS should be enabled when latency is a concern or whenever receive
83 interrupt processing forms a bottleneck. Spreading load between CPUs
84 decreases queue length. For low latency networking, the optimal setting
85 is to allocate as many queues as there are CPUs in the system (or the
86 NIC maximum, if lower). The most efficient high-rate configuration
87 is likely the one with the smallest number of receive queues where no
88 receive queue overflows due to a saturated CPU, because in default
89 mode with interrupt coalescing enabled, the aggregate number of
90 interrupts (and thus work) grows with each additional queue.
92 Per-cpu load can be observed using the mpstat utility, but note that on
93 processors with hyperthreading (HT), each hyperthread is represented as
94 a separate CPU. For interrupt handling, HT has shown no benefit in
95 initial tests, so limit the number of queues to the number of CPU cores
99 RPS: Receive Packet Steering
100 ============================
102 Receive Packet Steering (RPS) is logically a software implementation of
103 RSS. Being in software, it is necessarily called later in the datapath.
104 Whereas RSS selects the queue and hence CPU that will run the hardware
105 interrupt handler, RPS selects the CPU to perform protocol processing
106 above the interrupt handler. This is accomplished by placing the packet
107 on the desired CPU’s backlog queue and waking up the CPU for processing.
108 RPS has some advantages over RSS: 1) it can be used with any NIC,
109 2) software filters can easily be added to hash over new protocols,
110 3) it does not increase hardware device interrupt rate (although it does
111 introduce inter-processor interrupts (IPIs)).
113 RPS is called during bottom half of the receive interrupt handler, when
114 a driver sends a packet up the network stack with netif_rx() or
115 netif_receive_skb(). These call the get_rps_cpu() function, which
116 selects the queue that should process a packet.
118 The first step in determining the target CPU for RPS is to calculate a
119 flow hash over the packet’s addresses or ports (2-tuple or 4-tuple hash
120 depending on the protocol). This serves as a consistent hash of the
121 associated flow of the packet. The hash is either provided by hardware
122 or will be computed in the stack. Capable hardware can pass the hash in
123 the receive descriptor for the packet; this would usually be the same
124 hash used for RSS (e.g. computed Toeplitz hash). The hash is saved in
125 skb->rx_hash and can be used elsewhere in the stack as a hash of the
128 Each receive hardware queue has an associated list of CPUs to which
129 RPS may enqueue packets for processing. For each received packet,
130 an index into the list is computed from the flow hash modulo the size
131 of the list. The indexed CPU is the target for processing the packet,
132 and the packet is queued to the tail of that CPU’s backlog queue. At
133 the end of the bottom half routine, IPIs are sent to any CPUs for which
134 packets have been queued to their backlog queue. The IPI wakes backlog
135 processing on the remote CPU, and any queued packets are then processed
136 up the networking stack.
138 ==== RPS Configuration
140 RPS requires a kernel compiled with the CONFIG_RPS kconfig symbol (on
141 by default for SMP). Even when compiled in, RPS remains disabled until
142 explicitly configured. The list of CPUs to which RPS may forward traffic
143 can be configured for each receive queue using a sysfs file entry:
145 /sys/class/net/<dev>/queues/rx-<n>/rps_cpus
147 This file implements a bitmap of CPUs. RPS is disabled when it is zero
148 (the default), in which case packets are processed on the interrupting
149 CPU. Documentation/IRQ-affinity.txt explains how CPUs are assigned to
152 == Suggested Configuration
154 For a single queue device, a typical RPS configuration would be to set
155 the rps_cpus to the CPUs in the same memory domain of the interrupting
156 CPU. If NUMA locality is not an issue, this could also be all CPUs in
157 the system. At high interrupt rate, it might be wise to exclude the
158 interrupting CPU from the map since that already performs much work.
160 For a multi-queue system, if RSS is configured so that a hardware
161 receive queue is mapped to each CPU, then RPS is probably redundant
162 and unnecessary. If there are fewer hardware queues than CPUs, then
163 RPS might be beneficial if the rps_cpus for each queue are the ones that
164 share the same memory domain as the interrupting CPU for that queue.
167 RFS: Receive Flow Steering
168 ==========================
170 While RPS steers packets solely based on hash, and thus generally
171 provides good load distribution, it does not take into account
172 application locality. This is accomplished by Receive Flow Steering
173 (RFS). The goal of RFS is to increase datacache hitrate by steering
174 kernel processing of packets to the CPU where the application thread
175 consuming the packet is running. RFS relies on the same RPS mechanisms
176 to enqueue packets onto the backlog of another CPU and to wake up that
179 In RFS, packets are not forwarded directly by the value of their hash,
180 but the hash is used as index into a flow lookup table. This table maps
181 flows to the CPUs where those flows are being processed. The flow hash
182 (see RPS section above) is used to calculate the index into this table.
183 The CPU recorded in each entry is the one which last processed the flow.
184 If an entry does not hold a valid CPU, then packets mapped to that entry
185 are steered using plain RPS. Multiple table entries may point to the
186 same CPU. Indeed, with many flows and few CPUs, it is very likely that
187 a single application thread handles flows with many different flow hashes.
189 rps_sock_flow_table is a global flow table that contains the *desired* CPU
190 for flows: the CPU that is currently processing the flow in userspace.
191 Each table value is a CPU index that is updated during calls to recvmsg
192 and sendmsg (specifically, inet_recvmsg(), inet_sendmsg(), inet_sendpage()
193 and tcp_splice_read()).
195 When the scheduler moves a thread to a new CPU while it has outstanding
196 receive packets on the old CPU, packets may arrive out of order. To
197 avoid this, RFS uses a second flow table to track outstanding packets
198 for each flow: rps_dev_flow_table is a table specific to each hardware
199 receive queue of each device. Each table value stores a CPU index and a
200 counter. The CPU index represents the *current* CPU onto which packets
201 for this flow are enqueued for further kernel processing. Ideally, kernel
202 and userspace processing occur on the same CPU, and hence the CPU index
203 in both tables is identical. This is likely false if the scheduler has
204 recently migrated a userspace thread while the kernel still has packets
205 enqueued for kernel processing on the old CPU.
207 The counter in rps_dev_flow_table values records the length of the current
208 CPU's backlog when a packet in this flow was last enqueued. Each backlog
209 queue has a head counter that is incremented on dequeue. A tail counter
210 is computed as head counter + queue length. In other words, the counter
211 in rps_dev_flow[i] records the last element in flow i that has
212 been enqueued onto the currently designated CPU for flow i (of course,
213 entry i is actually selected by hash and multiple flows may hash to the
216 And now the trick for avoiding out of order packets: when selecting the
217 CPU for packet processing (from get_rps_cpu()) the rps_sock_flow table
218 and the rps_dev_flow table of the queue that the packet was received on
219 are compared. If the desired CPU for the flow (found in the
220 rps_sock_flow table) matches the current CPU (found in the rps_dev_flow
221 table), the packet is enqueued onto that CPU’s backlog. If they differ,
222 the current CPU is updated to match the desired CPU if one of the
225 - The current CPU's queue head counter >= the recorded tail counter
226 value in rps_dev_flow[i]
227 - The current CPU is unset (equal to RPS_NO_CPU)
228 - The current CPU is offline
230 After this check, the packet is sent to the (possibly updated) current
231 CPU. These rules aim to ensure that a flow only moves to a new CPU when
232 there are no packets outstanding on the old CPU, as the outstanding
233 packets could arrive later than those about to be processed on the new
236 ==== RFS Configuration
238 RFS is only available if the kconfig symbol CONFIG_RPS is enabled (on
239 by default for SMP). The functionality remains disabled until explicitly
240 configured. The number of entries in the global flow table is set through:
242 /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries
244 The number of entries in the per-queue flow table are set through:
246 /sys/class/net/<dev>/queues/rx-<n>/rps_flow_cnt
248 == Suggested Configuration
250 Both of these need to be set before RFS is enabled for a receive queue.
251 Values for both are rounded up to the nearest power of two. The
252 suggested flow count depends on the expected number of active connections
253 at any given time, which may be significantly less than the number of open
254 connections. We have found that a value of 32768 for rps_sock_flow_entries
255 works fairly well on a moderately loaded server.
257 For a single queue device, the rps_flow_cnt value for the single queue
258 would normally be configured to the same value as rps_sock_flow_entries.
259 For a multi-queue device, the rps_flow_cnt for each queue might be
260 configured as rps_sock_flow_entries / N, where N is the number of
261 queues. So for instance, if rps_sock_flow_entries is set to 32768 and there
262 are 16 configured receive queues, rps_flow_cnt for each queue might be
269 Accelerated RFS is to RFS what RSS is to RPS: a hardware-accelerated load
270 balancing mechanism that uses soft state to steer flows based on where
271 the application thread consuming the packets of each flow is running.
272 Accelerated RFS should perform better than RFS since packets are sent
273 directly to a CPU local to the thread consuming the data. The target CPU
274 will either be the same CPU where the application runs, or at least a CPU
275 which is local to the application thread’s CPU in the cache hierarchy.
277 To enable accelerated RFS, the networking stack calls the
278 ndo_rx_flow_steer driver function to communicate the desired hardware
279 queue for packets matching a particular flow. The network stack
280 automatically calls this function every time a flow entry in
281 rps_dev_flow_table is updated. The driver in turn uses a device specific
282 method to program the NIC to steer the packets.
284 The hardware queue for a flow is derived from the CPU recorded in
285 rps_dev_flow_table. The stack consults a CPU to hardware queue map which
286 is maintained by the NIC driver. This is an auto-generated reverse map of
287 the IRQ affinity table shown by /proc/interrupts. Drivers can use
288 functions in the cpu_rmap (“CPU affinity reverse map”) kernel library
289 to populate the map. For each CPU, the corresponding queue in the map is
290 set to be one whose processing CPU is closest in cache locality.
292 ==== Accelerated RFS Configuration
294 Accelerated RFS is only available if the kernel is compiled with
295 CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL and support is provided by the NIC device and driver.
296 It also requires that ntuple filtering is enabled via ethtool. The map
297 of CPU to queues is automatically deduced from the IRQ affinities
298 configured for each receive queue by the driver, so no additional
299 configuration should be necessary.
301 == Suggested Configuration
303 This technique should be enabled whenever one wants to use RFS and the
304 NIC supports hardware acceleration.
306 XPS: Transmit Packet Steering
307 =============================
309 Transmit Packet Steering is a mechanism for intelligently selecting
310 which transmit queue to use when transmitting a packet on a multi-queue
311 device. To accomplish this, a mapping from CPU to hardware queue(s) is
312 recorded. The goal of this mapping is usually to assign queues
313 exclusively to a subset of CPUs, where the transmit completions for
314 these queues are processed on a CPU within this set. This choice
315 provides two benefits. First, contention on the device queue lock is
316 significantly reduced since fewer CPUs contend for the same queue
317 (contention can be eliminated completely if each CPU has its own
318 transmit queue). Secondly, cache miss rate on transmit completion is
319 reduced, in particular for data cache lines that hold the sk_buff
322 XPS is configured per transmit queue by setting a bitmap of CPUs that
323 may use that queue to transmit. The reverse mapping, from CPUs to
324 transmit queues, is computed and maintained for each network device.
325 When transmitting the first packet in a flow, the function
326 get_xps_queue() is called to select a queue. This function uses the ID
327 of the running CPU as a key into the CPU-to-queue lookup table. If the
328 ID matches a single queue, that is used for transmission. If multiple
329 queues match, one is selected by using the flow hash to compute an index
332 The queue chosen for transmitting a particular flow is saved in the
333 corresponding socket structure for the flow (e.g. a TCP connection).
334 This transmit queue is used for subsequent packets sent on the flow to
335 prevent out of order (ooo) packets. The choice also amortizes the cost
336 of calling get_xps_queues() over all packets in the flow. To avoid
337 ooo packets, the queue for a flow can subsequently only be changed if
338 skb->ooo_okay is set for a packet in the flow. This flag indicates that
339 there are no outstanding packets in the flow, so the transmit queue can
340 change without the risk of generating out of order packets. The
341 transport layer is responsible for setting ooo_okay appropriately. TCP,
342 for instance, sets the flag when all data for a connection has been
345 ==== XPS Configuration
347 XPS is only available if the kconfig symbol CONFIG_XPS is enabled (on by
348 default for SMP). The functionality remains disabled until explicitly
349 configured. To enable XPS, the bitmap of CPUs that may use a transmit
350 queue is configured using the sysfs file entry:
352 /sys/class/net/<dev>/queues/tx-<n>/xps_cpus
354 == Suggested Configuration
356 For a network device with a single transmission queue, XPS configuration
357 has no effect, since there is no choice in this case. In a multi-queue
358 system, XPS is preferably configured so that each CPU maps onto one queue.
359 If there are as many queues as there are CPUs in the system, then each
360 queue can also map onto one CPU, resulting in exclusive pairings that
361 experience no contention. If there are fewer queues than CPUs, then the
362 best CPUs to share a given queue are probably those that share the cache
363 with the CPU that processes transmit completions for that queue
364 (transmit interrupts).
369 RPS and RFS were introduced in kernel 2.6.35. XPS was incorporated into
370 2.6.38. Original patches were submitted by Tom Herbert
371 (therbert@google.com)
373 Accelerated RFS was introduced in 2.6.35. Original patches were
374 submitted by Ben Hutchings (bhutchings@solarflare.com)
377 Tom Herbert (therbert@google.com)
378 Willem de Bruijn (willemb@google.com)