1 Checklist (and a short version for the impatient):
3 - make commits of logical units
4 - check for unnecessary whitespace with "git diff --check"
6 - do not check in commented out code or unneeded files
7 - provide a meaningful commit message
8 - the first line of the commit message should be a short
9 description and should skip the full stop
10 - if you want your work included in git.git, add a
11 "Signed-off-by: Your Name <your@email.com>" line to the
12 commit message (or just use the option "-s" when
13 committing) to confirm that you agree to the Developer's
15 - do not PGP sign your patch
16 - use "git format-patch -M" to create the patch
17 - do not attach your patch, but read in the mail
18 body, unless you cannot teach your mailer to
19 leave the formatting of the patch alone.
20 - be careful doing cut & paste into your mailer, not to
22 - provide additional information (which is unsuitable for
23 the commit message) between the "---" and the diffstat
24 - send the patch to the list _and_ the maintainer
28 I started reading over the SubmittingPatches document for Linux
29 kernel, primarily because I wanted to have a document similar to
30 it for the core GIT to make sure people understand what they are
31 doing when they write "Signed-off-by" line.
33 But the patch submission requirements are a lot more relaxed
34 here on the technical/contents front, because the core GIT is
35 thousand times smaller ;-). So here is only the relevant bits.
38 (1) Make separate commits for logically separate changes.
40 Unless your patch is really trivial, you should not be sending
41 out a patch that was generated between your working tree and
42 your commit head. Instead, always make a commit with complete
43 commit message and generate a series of patches from your
44 repository. It is a good discipline.
46 Describe the technical detail of the change(s).
48 If your description starts to get too long, that's a sign that you
49 probably need to split up your commit to finer grained pieces.
51 Oh, another thing. I am picky about whitespaces. Make sure your
52 changes do not trigger errors with the sample pre-commit hook shipped
53 in templates/hooks--pre-commit. To help ensure this does not happen,
54 run git diff --check on your changes before you commit.
57 (2) Generate your patch using git tools out of your commits.
59 git based diff tools (git, Cogito, and StGIT included) generate
60 unidiff which is the preferred format.
62 You do not have to be afraid to use -M option to "git diff" or
63 "git format-patch", if your patch involves file renames. The
64 receiving end can handle them just fine.
66 Please make sure your patch does not include any extra files
67 which do not belong in a patch submission. Make sure to review
68 your patch after generating it, to ensure accuracy. Before
69 sending out, please make sure it cleanly applies to the "master"
70 branch head. If you are preparing a work based on "next" branch,
71 that is fine, but please mark it as such.
74 (3) Sending your patches.
76 People on the git mailing list need to be able to read and
77 comment on the changes you are submitting. It is important for
78 a developer to be able to "quote" your changes, using standard
79 e-mail tools, so that they may comment on specific portions of
80 your code. For this reason, all patches should be submitted
81 "inline". WARNING: Be wary of your MUAs word-wrap
82 corrupting your patch. Do not cut-n-paste your patch; you can
83 lose tabs that way if you are not careful.
85 It is a common convention to prefix your subject line with
86 [PATCH]. This lets people easily distinguish patches from other
89 "git format-patch" command follows the best current practice to
90 format the body of an e-mail message. At the beginning of the
91 patch should come your commit message, ending with the
92 Signed-off-by: lines, and a line that consists of three dashes,
93 followed by the diffstat information and the patch itself. If
94 you are forwarding a patch from somebody else, optionally, at
95 the beginning of the e-mail message just before the commit
96 message starts, you can put a "From: " line to name that person.
98 You often want to add additional explanation about the patch,
99 other than the commit message itself. Place such "cover letter"
100 material between the three dash lines and the diffstat.
102 Do not attach the patch as a MIME attachment, compressed or not.
103 Do not let your e-mail client send quoted-printable. Do not let
104 your e-mail client send format=flowed which would destroy
105 whitespaces in your patches. Many
106 popular e-mail applications will not always transmit a MIME
107 attachment as plain text, making it impossible to comment on
108 your code. A MIME attachment also takes a bit more time to
109 process. This does not decrease the likelihood of your
110 MIME-attached change being accepted, but it makes it more likely
111 that it will be postponed.
113 Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
114 you to re-send them using MIME, that is OK.
116 Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now. Most likely, your
117 maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP
118 key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not
119 judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a
120 far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known,
121 respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things.
123 If you really really really really want to do a PGP signed
124 patch, format it as "multipart/signed", not a text/plain message
125 that starts with '-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----'. That is
126 not a text/plain, it's something else.
128 Note that your maintainer does not necessarily read everything
129 on the git mailing list. If your patch is for discussion first,
130 send it "To:" the mailing list, and optionally "cc:" him. If it
131 is trivially correct or after the list reached a consensus, send
132 it "To:" the maintainer and optionally "cc:" the list.
134 Also note that your maintainer does not actively involve himself in
135 maintaining what are in contrib/ hierarchy. When you send fixes and
136 enhancements to them, do not forget to "cc: " the person who primarily
137 worked on that hierarchy in contrib/.
142 To improve tracking of who did what, we've borrowed the
143 "sign-off" procedure from the Linux kernel project on patches
144 that are being emailed around. Although core GIT is a lot
145 smaller project it is a good discipline to follow it.
147 The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for
148 the patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have
149 the right to pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are
150 pretty simple: if you can certify the below:
152 Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
154 By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
156 (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
157 have the right to submit it under the open source license
158 indicated in the file; or
160 (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
161 of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
162 license and I have the right under that license to submit that
163 work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
164 by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
165 permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
168 (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
169 person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
172 (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
173 are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
174 personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
175 maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
176 this project or the open source license(s) involved.
178 then you just add a line saying
180 Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
182 This line can be automatically added by git if you run the git-commit
183 command with the -s option.
185 Some people also put extra tags at the end. They'll just be ignored for
186 now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just
187 point out some special detail about the sign-off.
190 ------------------------------------------------
193 Some of patches I receive or pick up from the list share common
194 patterns of breakage. Please make sure your MUA is set up
195 properly not to corrupt whitespaces. Here are two common ones
198 * Empty context lines that do not have _any_ whitespace.
200 * Non empty context lines that have one extra whitespace at the
203 One test you could do yourself if your MUA is set up correctly is:
205 * Send the patch to yourself, exactly the way you would, except
206 To: and Cc: lines, which would not contain the list and
209 * Save that patch to a file in UNIX mailbox format. Call it say
212 * Try to apply to the tip of the "master" branch from the
213 git.git public repository:
215 $ git fetch http://kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git master:test-apply
216 $ git checkout test-apply
218 $ git applymbox a.patch
220 If it does not apply correctly, there can be various reasons.
222 * Your patch itself does not apply cleanly. That is _bad_ but
223 does not have much to do with your MUA. Please rebase the
226 * Your MUA corrupted your patch; applymbox would complain that
227 the patch does not apply. Look at .dotest/ subdirectory and
228 see what 'patch' file contains and check for the common
229 corruption patterns mentioned above.
231 * While you are at it, check what are in 'info' and
232 'final-commit' files as well. If what is in 'final-commit' is
233 not exactly what you would want to see in the commit log
234 message, it is very likely that your maintainer would end up
235 hand editing the log message when he applies your patch.
236 Things like "Hi, this is my first patch.\n", if you really
237 want to put in the patch e-mail, should come after the
238 three-dash line that signals the end of the commit message.
244 (Johannes Schindelin)
246 I don't know how many people still use pine, but for those poor
247 souls it may be good to mention that the quell-flowed-text is
248 needed for recent versions.
250 ... the "no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, too. AFAIK it
251 was introduced in 4.60.
255 And 4.58 needs at least this.
258 diff-tree 8326dd8350be64ac7fc805f6563a1d61ad10d32c (from e886a61f76edf5410573e92e38ce22974f9c40f1)
259 Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
260 Date: Mon Aug 15 17:23:51 2005 -0700
262 Fix pine whitespace-corruption bug
264 There's no excuse for unconditionally removing whitespace from
265 the pico buffers on close.
267 diff --git a/pico/pico.c b/pico/pico.c
270 @@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ PICO *pm;
271 switch(pico_all_done){ /* prepare for/handle final events */
272 case COMP_EXIT : /* already confirmed */
283 > A patch to SubmittingPatches, MUA specific help section for
284 > users of Pine 4.63 would be very much appreciated.
286 Ah, it looks like a recent version changed the default behavior to do the
287 right thing, and inverted the sense of the configuration option. (Either
288 that or Gentoo did it.) So you need to set the
289 "no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, unless the option you have is
290 "strip-whitespace-before-send", in which case you should avoid checking
299 Here are some hints on how to successfully submit patches inline using
302 This recipe appears to work with the current [*1*] Thunderbird from Suse.
304 The following Thunderbird extensions are needed:
306 http://aboutconfig.mozdev.org/
307 External Editor 0.7.2
308 http://globs.org/articles.php?lng=en&pg=8
310 1) Prepare the patch as a text file using your method of choice.
312 2) Before opening a compose window, use Edit->Account Settings to
313 uncheck the "Compose messages in HTML format" setting in the
314 "Composition & Addressing" panel of the account to be used to send the
317 3) In the main Thunderbird window, _before_ you open the compose window
318 for the patch, use Tools->about:config to set the following to the
320 mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed => false
321 mailnews.wraplength => 0
323 4) Open a compose window and click the external editor icon.
325 5) In the external editor window, read in the patch file and exit the
328 6) Back in the compose window: Add whatever other text you wish to the
329 message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.
331 7) Optionally, undo the about:config/account settings changes made in
336 *1* Version 1.0 (20041207) from the MozillaThunderbird-1.0-5 rpm of Suse
337 9.3 professional updates.
339 *2* It may be possible to do this with about:config and the following
340 settings but I haven't tried, yet.
341 mail.html_compose => false
342 mail.identity.default.compose_html => false
343 mail.identity.id?.compose_html => false
349 '|' in the *Summary* buffer can be used to pipe the current
350 message to an external program, and this is a handy way to drive
351 "git am". However, if the message is MIME encoded, what is
352 piped into the program is the representation you see in your
353 *Article* buffer after unwrapping MIME. This is often not what
354 you would want for two reasons. It tends to screw up non ASCII
355 characters (most notably in people's names), and also
356 whitespaces (fatal in patches). Running 'C-u g' to display the
357 message in raw form before using '|' to run the pipe can work
364 This should help you to submit patches inline using KMail.
366 1) Prepare the patch as a text file.
368 2) Click on New Mail.
370 3) Go under "Options" in the Composer window and be sure that
371 "Word wrap" is not set.
373 4) Use Message -> Insert file... and insert the patch.
375 5) Back in the compose window: add whatever other text you wish to the
376 message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.