sha1-lookup.c

   1 #include "cache.h"
   2 #include "sha1-lookup.h"
   3
   4 static uint32_t take2(const unsigned char *sha1)
   5 {
   6         return ((sha1[0] << 8) | sha1[1]);
   7 }
   8
   9 /*
  10  * Conventional binary search loop looks like this:
  11  *
  12  *      do {
  13  *              int mi = (lo + hi) / 2;
  14  *              int cmp = "entry pointed at by mi" minus "target";
  15  *              if (!cmp)
  16  *                      return (mi is the wanted one)
  17  *              if (cmp > 0)
  18  *                      hi = mi; "mi is larger than target"
  19  *              else
  20  *                      lo = mi+1; "mi is smaller than target"
  21  *      } while (lo < hi);
  22  *
  23  * The invariants are:
  24  *
  25  * - When entering the loop, lo points at a slot that is never
  26  *   above the target (it could be at the target), hi points at a
  27  *   slot that is guaranteed to be above the target (it can never
  28  *   be at the target).
  29  *
  30  * - We find a point 'mi' between lo and hi (mi could be the same
  31  *   as lo, but never can be the same as hi), and check if it hits
  32  *   the target.  There are three cases:
  33  *
  34  *    - if it is a hit, we are happy.
  35  *
  36  *    - if it is strictly higher than the target, we update hi with
  37  *      it.
  38  *
  39  *    - if it is strictly lower than the target, we update lo to be
  40  *      one slot after it, because we allow lo to be at the target.
  41  *
  42  * When choosing 'mi', we do not have to take the "middle" but
  43  * anywhere in between lo and hi, as long as lo <= mi < hi is
  44  * satisfied.  When we somehow know that the distance between the
  45  * target and lo is much shorter than the target and hi, we could
  46  * pick mi that is much closer to lo than the midway.
  47  */
  48 /*
  49  * The table should contain "nr" elements.
  50  * The sha1 of element i (between 0 and nr - 1) should be returned
  51  * by "fn(i, table)".
  52  */
  53 int sha1_pos(const unsigned char *sha1, void *table, size_t nr,
  54              sha1_access_fn fn)
  55 {
  56         size_t hi = nr;
  57         size_t lo = 0;
  58         size_t mi = 0;
  59
  60         if (!nr)
  61                 return -1;
  62
  63         if (nr != 1) {
  64                 size_t lov, hiv, miv, ofs;
  65
  66                 for (ofs = 0; ofs < 18; ofs += 2) {
  67                         lov = take2(fn(0, table) + ofs);
  68                         hiv = take2(fn(nr - 1, table) + ofs);
  69                         miv = take2(sha1 + ofs);
  70                         if (miv < lov)
  71                                 return -1;
  72                         if (hiv < miv)
  73                                 return -1 - nr;
  74                         if (lov != hiv) {
  75                                 /*
  76                                  * At this point miv could be equal
  77                                  * to hiv (but sha1 could still be higher);
  78                                  * the invariant of (mi < hi) should be
  79                                  * kept.
  80                                  */
  81                                 mi = (nr - 1) * (miv - lov) / (hiv - lov);
  82                                 if (lo <= mi && mi < hi)
  83                                         break;
  84                                 die("BUG: assertion failed in binary search");
  85                         }
  86                 }
  87                 if (18 <= ofs)
  88                         die("cannot happen -- lo and hi are identical");
  89         }
  90
  91         do {
  92                 int cmp;
  93                 cmp = hashcmp(fn(mi, table), sha1);
  94                 if (!cmp)
  95                         return mi;
  96                 if (cmp > 0)
  97                         hi = mi;
  98                 else
  99                         lo = mi + 1;
 100                 mi = (hi + lo) / 2;
 101         } while (lo < hi);
 102         return -lo-1;
 103 }
 104
 105 /*
 106  * Conventional binary search loop looks like this:
 107  *
 108  *      unsigned lo, hi;
 109  *      do {
 110  *              unsigned mi = (lo + hi) / 2;
 111  *              int cmp = "entry pointed at by mi" minus "target";
 112  *              if (!cmp)
 113  *                      return (mi is the wanted one)
 114  *              if (cmp > 0)
 115  *                      hi = mi; "mi is larger than target"
 116  *              else
 117  *                      lo = mi+1; "mi is smaller than target"
 118  *      } while (lo < hi);
 119  *
 120  * The invariants are:
 121  *
 122  * - When entering the loop, lo points at a slot that is never
 123  *   above the target (it could be at the target), hi points at a
 124  *   slot that is guaranteed to be above the target (it can never
 125  *   be at the target).
 126  *
 127  * - We find a point 'mi' between lo and hi (mi could be the same
 128  *   as lo, but never can be as same as hi), and check if it hits
 129  *   the target.  There are three cases:
 130  *
 131  *    - if it is a hit, we are happy.
 132  *
 133  *    - if it is strictly higher than the target, we set it to hi,
 134  *      and repeat the search.
 135  *
 136  *    - if it is strictly lower than the target, we update lo to
 137  *      one slot after it, because we allow lo to be at the target.
 138  *
 139  *   If the loop exits, there is no matching entry.
 140  *
 141  * When choosing 'mi', we do not have to take the "middle" but
 142  * anywhere in between lo and hi, as long as lo <= mi < hi is
 143  * satisfied.  When we somehow know that the distance between the
 144  * target and lo is much shorter than the target and hi, we could
 145  * pick mi that is much closer to lo than the midway.
 146  *
 147  * Now, we can take advantage of the fact that SHA-1 is a good hash
 148  * function, and as long as there are enough entries in the table, we
 149  * can expect uniform distribution.  An entry that begins with for
 150  * example "deadbeef..." is much likely to appear much later than in
 151  * the midway of the table.  It can reasonably be expected to be near
 152  * 87% (222/256) from the top of the table.
 153  *
 154  * However, we do not want to pick "mi" too precisely.  If the entry at
 155  * the 87% in the above example turns out to be higher than the target
 156  * we are looking for, we would end up narrowing the search space down
 157  * only by 13%, instead of 50% we would get if we did a simple binary
 158  * search.  So we would want to hedge our bets by being less aggressive.
 159  *
 160  * The table at "table" holds at least "nr" entries of "elem_size"
 161  * bytes each.  Each entry has the SHA-1 key at "key_offset".  The
 162  * table is sorted by the SHA-1 key of the entries.  The caller wants
 163  * to find the entry with "key", and knows that the entry at "lo" is
 164  * not higher than the entry it is looking for, and that the entry at
 165  * "hi" is higher than the entry it is looking for.
 166  */
 167 int sha1_entry_pos(const void *table,
 168                    size_t elem_size,
 169                    size_t key_offset,
 170                    unsigned lo, unsigned hi, unsigned nr,
 171                    const unsigned char *key)
 172 {
 173         const unsigned char *base = table;
 174         const unsigned char *hi_key, *lo_key;
 175         unsigned ofs_0;
 176         static int debug_lookup = -1;
 177
 178         if (debug_lookup < 0)
 179                 debug_lookup = !!getenv("GIT_DEBUG_LOOKUP");
 180
 181         if (!nr || lo >= hi)
 182                 return -1;
 183
 184         if (nr == hi)
 185                 hi_key = NULL;
 186         else
 187                 hi_key = base + elem_size * hi + key_offset;
 188         lo_key = base + elem_size * lo + key_offset;
 189
 190         ofs_0 = 0;
 191         do {
 192                 int cmp;
 193                 unsigned ofs, mi, range;
 194                 unsigned lov, hiv, kyv;
 195                 const unsigned char *mi_key;
 196
 197                 range = hi - lo;
 198                 if (hi_key) {
 199                         for (ofs = ofs_0; ofs < 20; ofs++)
 200                                 if (lo_key[ofs] != hi_key[ofs])
 201                                         break;
 202                         ofs_0 = ofs;
 203                         /*
 204                          * byte 0 thru (ofs-1) are the same between
 205                          * lo and hi; ofs is the first byte that is
 206                          * different.
 207                          */
 208                         hiv = hi_key[ofs_0];
 209                         if (ofs_0 < 19)
 210                                 hiv = (hiv << 8) | hi_key[ofs_0+1];
 211                 } else {
 212                         hiv = 256;
 213                         if (ofs_0 < 19)
 214                                 hiv <<= 8;
 215                 }
 216                 lov = lo_key[ofs_0];
 217                 kyv = key[ofs_0];
 218                 if (ofs_0 < 19) {
 219                         lov = (lov << 8) | lo_key[ofs_0+1];
 220                         kyv = (kyv << 8) | key[ofs_0+1];
 221                 }
 222                 assert(lov < hiv);
 223
 224                 if (kyv < lov)
 225                         return -1 - lo;
 226                 if (hiv < kyv)
 227                         return -1 - hi;
 228
 229                 /*
 230                  * Even if we know the target is much closer to 'hi'
 231                  * than 'lo', if we pick too precisely and overshoot
 232                  * (e.g. when we know 'mi' is closer to 'hi' than to
 233                  * 'lo', pick 'mi' that is higher than the target), we
 234                  * end up narrowing the search space by a smaller
 235                  * amount (i.e. the distance between 'mi' and 'hi')
 236                  * than what we would have (i.e. about half of 'lo'
 237                  * and 'hi').  Hedge our bets to pick 'mi' less
 238                  * aggressively, i.e. make 'mi' a bit closer to the
 239                  * middle than we would otherwise pick.
 240                  */
 241                 kyv = (kyv * 6 + lov + hiv) / 8;
 242                 if (lov < hiv - 1) {
 243                         if (kyv == lov)
 244                                 kyv++;
 245                         else if (kyv == hiv)
 246                                 kyv--;
 247                 }
 248                 mi = (range - 1) * (kyv - lov) / (hiv - lov) + lo;
 249
 250                 if (debug_lookup) {
 251                         printf("lo %u hi %u rg %u mi %u ", lo, hi, range, mi);
 252                         printf("ofs %u lov %x, hiv %x, kyv %x\n",
 253                                ofs_0, lov, hiv, kyv);
 254                 }
 255                 if (!(lo <= mi && mi < hi))
 256                         die("assertion failure lo %u mi %u hi %u %s",
 257                             lo, mi, hi, sha1_to_hex(key));
 258
 259                 mi_key = base + elem_size * mi + key_offset;
 260                 cmp = memcmp(mi_key + ofs_0, key + ofs_0, 20 - ofs_0);
 261                 if (!cmp)
 262                         return mi;
 263                 if (cmp > 0) {
 264                         hi = mi;
 265                         hi_key = mi_key;
 266                 } else {
 267                         lo = mi + 1;
 268                         lo_key = mi_key + elem_size;
 269                 }
 270         } while (lo < hi);
 271         return -lo-1;
 272 }