6 git-read-tree - Reads tree information into the index
12 'git read-tree' [[-m [--trivial] [--aggressive] | --reset | --prefix=<prefix>]
13 [-u [--exclude-per-directory=<gitignore>] | -i]]
14 [--index-output=<file>] [--no-sparse-checkout]
15 (--empty | <tree-ish1> [<tree-ish2> [<tree-ish3>]])
20 Reads the tree information given by <tree-ish> into the index,
21 but does not actually *update* any of the files it "caches". (see:
22 linkgit:git-checkout-index[1])
24 Optionally, it can merge a tree into the index, perform a
25 fast-forward (i.e. 2-way) merge, or a 3-way merge, with the `-m`
26 flag. When used with `-m`, the `-u` flag causes it to also update
27 the files in the work tree with the result of the merge.
29 Trivial merges are done by 'git read-tree' itself. Only conflicting paths
30 will be in unmerged state when 'git read-tree' returns.
35 Perform a merge, not just a read. The command will
36 refuse to run if your index file has unmerged entries,
37 indicating that you have not finished previous merge you
41 Same as -m, except that unmerged entries are discarded
45 After a successful merge, update the files in the work
46 tree with the result of the merge.
49 Usually a merge requires the index file as well as the
50 files in the working tree to be up to date with the
51 current head commit, in order not to lose local
52 changes. This flag disables the check with the working
53 tree and is meant to be used when creating a merge of
54 trees that are not directly related to the current
55 working tree status into a temporary index file.
59 Check if the command would error out, without updating the index
60 or the files in the working tree for real.
63 Show the progress of checking files out.
66 Restrict three-way merge by 'git read-tree' to happen
67 only if there is no file-level merging required, instead
68 of resolving merge for trivial cases and leaving
69 conflicting files unresolved in the index.
72 Usually a three-way merge by 'git read-tree' resolves
73 the merge for really trivial cases and leaves other
74 cases unresolved in the index, so that porcelains can
75 implement different merge policies. This flag makes the
76 command resolve a few more cases internally:
78 * when one side removes a path and the other side leaves the path
79 unmodified. The resolution is to remove that path.
80 * when both sides remove a path. The resolution is to remove that path.
81 * when both sides add a path identically. The resolution
85 Keep the current index contents, and read the contents
86 of the named tree-ish under the directory at `<prefix>`.
87 The command will refuse to overwrite entries that already
88 existed in the original index file.
90 --exclude-per-directory=<gitignore>::
91 When running the command with `-u` and `-m` options, the
92 merge result may need to overwrite paths that are not
93 tracked in the current branch. The command usually
94 refuses to proceed with the merge to avoid losing such a
95 path. However this safety valve sometimes gets in the
96 way. For example, it often happens that the other
97 branch added a file that used to be a generated file in
98 your branch, and the safety valve triggers when you try
99 to switch to that branch after you ran `make` but before
100 running `make clean` to remove the generated file. This
101 option tells the command to read per-directory exclude
102 file (usually '.gitignore') and allows such an untracked
103 but explicitly ignored file to be overwritten.
105 --index-output=<file>::
106 Instead of writing the results out to `$GIT_INDEX_FILE`,
107 write the resulting index in the named file. While the
108 command is operating, the original index file is locked
109 with the same mechanism as usual. The file must allow
110 to be rename(2)ed into from a temporary file that is
111 created next to the usual index file; typically this
112 means it needs to be on the same filesystem as the index
113 file itself, and you need write permission to the
114 directories the index file and index output file are
117 --[no-]recurse-submodules::
118 Using --recurse-submodules will update the content of all initialized
119 submodules according to the commit recorded in the superproject by
120 calling read-tree recursively, also setting the submodules HEAD to be
121 detached at that commit.
123 --no-sparse-checkout::
124 Disable sparse checkout support even if `core.sparseCheckout`
128 Instead of reading tree object(s) into the index, just empty
132 The id of the tree object(s) to be read/merged.
137 If `-m` is specified, 'git read-tree' can perform 3 kinds of
138 merge, a single tree merge if only 1 tree is given, a
139 fast-forward merge with 2 trees, or a 3-way merge if 3 or more trees are
145 If only 1 tree is specified, 'git read-tree' operates as if the user did not
146 specify `-m`, except that if the original index has an entry for a
147 given pathname, and the contents of the path match with the tree
148 being read, the stat info from the index is used. (In other words, the
149 index's stat()s take precedence over the merged tree's).
151 That means that if you do a `git read-tree -m <newtree>` followed by a
152 `git checkout-index -f -u -a`, the 'git checkout-index' only checks out
153 the stuff that really changed.
155 This is used to avoid unnecessary false hits when 'git diff-files' is
156 run after 'git read-tree'.
162 Typically, this is invoked as `git read-tree -m $H $M`, where $H
163 is the head commit of the current repository, and $M is the head
164 of a foreign tree, which is simply ahead of $H (i.e. we are in a
165 fast-forward situation).
167 When two trees are specified, the user is telling 'git read-tree'
170 1. The current index and work tree is derived from $H, but
171 the user may have local changes in them since $H.
173 2. The user wants to fast-forward to $M.
175 In this case, the `git read-tree -m $H $M` command makes sure
176 that no local change is lost as the result of this "merge".
177 Here are the "carry forward" rules, where "I" denotes the index,
178 "clean" means that index and work tree coincide, and "exists"/"nothing"
179 refer to the presence of a path in the specified commit:
183 -------------------------------------------------------
184 0 nothing nothing nothing (does not happen)
185 1 nothing nothing exists use M
186 2 nothing exists nothing remove path from index
187 3 nothing exists exists, use M if "initial checkout",
188 H == M keep index otherwise
194 4 yes N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index
195 5 no N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index
197 6 yes N/A yes nothing exists keep index
198 7 no N/A yes nothing exists keep index
199 8 yes N/A no nothing exists fail
200 9 no N/A no nothing exists fail
202 10 yes yes N/A exists nothing remove path from index
203 11 no yes N/A exists nothing fail
204 12 yes no N/A exists nothing fail
205 13 no no N/A exists nothing fail
209 14 yes exists exists keep index
210 15 no exists exists keep index
212 clean I==H I==M (H!=M)
214 16 yes no no exists exists fail
215 17 no no no exists exists fail
216 18 yes no yes exists exists keep index
217 19 no no yes exists exists keep index
218 20 yes yes no exists exists use M
219 21 no yes no exists exists fail
222 In all "keep index" cases, the index entry stays as in the
223 original index file. If the entry is not up to date,
224 'git read-tree' keeps the copy in the work tree intact when
225 operating under the -u flag.
227 When this form of 'git read-tree' returns successfully, you can
228 see which of the "local changes" that you made were carried forward by running
229 `git diff-index --cached $M`. Note that this does not
230 necessarily match what `git diff-index --cached $H` would have
231 produced before such a two tree merge. This is because of cases
232 18 and 19 --- if you already had the changes in $M (e.g. maybe
233 you picked it up via e-mail in a patch form), `git diff-index
234 --cached $H` would have told you about the change before this
235 merge, but it would not show in `git diff-index --cached $M`
236 output after the two-tree merge.
238 Case 3 is slightly tricky and needs explanation. The result from this
239 rule logically should be to remove the path if the user staged the removal
240 of the path and then switching to a new branch. That however will prevent
241 the initial checkout from happening, so the rule is modified to use M (new
242 tree) only when the content of the index is empty. Otherwise the removal
243 of the path is kept as long as $H and $M are the same.
247 Each "index" entry has two bits worth of "stage" state. stage 0 is the
248 normal one, and is the only one you'd see in any kind of normal use.
250 However, when you do 'git read-tree' with three trees, the "stage"
253 This means that you can do
256 $ git read-tree -m <tree1> <tree2> <tree3>
259 and you will end up with an index with all of the <tree1> entries in
260 "stage1", all of the <tree2> entries in "stage2" and all of the
261 <tree3> entries in "stage3". When performing a merge of another
262 branch into the current branch, we use the common ancestor tree
263 as <tree1>, the current branch head as <tree2>, and the other
264 branch head as <tree3>.
266 Furthermore, 'git read-tree' has special-case logic that says: if you see
267 a file that matches in all respects in the following states, it
268 "collapses" back to "stage0":
270 - stage 2 and 3 are the same; take one or the other (it makes no
271 difference - the same work has been done on our branch in
272 stage 2 and their branch in stage 3)
274 - stage 1 and stage 2 are the same and stage 3 is different; take
275 stage 3 (our branch in stage 2 did not do anything since the
276 ancestor in stage 1 while their branch in stage 3 worked on
279 - stage 1 and stage 3 are the same and stage 2 is different take
280 stage 2 (we did something while they did nothing)
282 The 'git write-tree' command refuses to write a nonsensical tree, and it
283 will complain about unmerged entries if it sees a single entry that is not
286 OK, this all sounds like a collection of totally nonsensical rules,
287 but it's actually exactly what you want in order to do a fast
288 merge. The different stages represent the "result tree" (stage 0, aka
289 "merged"), the original tree (stage 1, aka "orig"), and the two trees
290 you are trying to merge (stage 2 and 3 respectively).
292 The order of stages 1, 2 and 3 (hence the order of three
293 <tree-ish> command-line arguments) are significant when you
294 start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
295 populated. Here is an outline of how the algorithm works:
297 - if a file exists in identical format in all three trees, it will
298 automatically collapse to "merged" state by 'git read-tree'.
300 - a file that has _any_ difference what-so-ever in the three trees
301 will stay as separate entries in the index. It's up to "porcelain
302 policy" to determine how to remove the non-0 stages, and insert a
305 - the index file saves and restores with all this information, so you
306 can merge things incrementally, but as long as it has entries in
307 stages 1/2/3 (i.e., "unmerged entries") you can't write the result. So
308 now the merge algorithm ends up being really simple:
310 * you walk the index in order, and ignore all entries of stage 0,
311 since they've already been done.
313 * if you find a "stage1", but no matching "stage2" or "stage3", you
314 know it's been removed from both trees (it only existed in the
315 original tree), and you remove that entry.
317 * if you find a matching "stage2" and "stage3" tree, you remove one
318 of them, and turn the other into a "stage0" entry. Remove any
319 matching "stage1" entry if it exists too. .. all the normal
322 You would normally use 'git merge-index' with supplied
323 'git merge-one-file' to do this last step. The script updates
324 the files in the working tree as it merges each path and at the
325 end of a successful merge.
327 When you start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already
328 populated, it is assumed that it represents the state of the
329 files in your work tree, and you can even have files with
330 changes unrecorded in the index file. It is further assumed
331 that this state is "derived" from the stage 2 tree. The 3-way
332 merge refuses to run if it finds an entry in the original index
333 file that does not match stage 2.
335 This is done to prevent you from losing your work-in-progress
336 changes, and mixing your random changes in an unrelated merge
337 commit. To illustrate, suppose you start from what has been
338 committed last to your repository:
341 $ JC=`git rev-parse --verify "HEAD^0"`
342 $ git checkout-index -f -u -a $JC
345 You do random edits, without running 'git update-index'. And then
346 you notice that the tip of your "upstream" tree has advanced
347 since you pulled from him:
350 $ git fetch git://.... linus
351 $ LT=`git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD`
354 Your work tree is still based on your HEAD ($JC), but you have
355 some edits since. Three-way merge makes sure that you have not
356 added or modified index entries since $JC, and if you haven't,
357 then does the right thing. So with the following sequence:
360 $ git read-tree -m -u `git merge-base $JC $LT` $JC $LT
361 $ git merge-index git-merge-one-file -a
362 $ echo "Merge with Linus" | \
363 git commit-tree `git write-tree` -p $JC -p $LT
366 what you would commit is a pure merge between $JC and $LT without
367 your work-in-progress changes, and your work tree would be
368 updated to the result of the merge.
370 However, if you have local changes in the working tree that
371 would be overwritten by this merge, 'git read-tree' will refuse
372 to run to prevent your changes from being lost.
374 In other words, there is no need to worry about what exists only
375 in the working tree. When you have local changes in a part of
376 the project that is not involved in the merge, your changes do
377 not interfere with the merge, and are kept intact. When they
378 *do* interfere, the merge does not even start ('git read-tree'
379 complains loudly and fails without modifying anything). In such
380 a case, you can simply continue doing what you were in the
381 middle of doing, and when your working tree is ready (i.e. you
382 have finished your work-in-progress), attempt the merge again.
388 "Sparse checkout" allows populating the working directory sparsely.
389 It uses the skip-worktree bit (see linkgit:git-update-index[1]) to tell
390 Git whether a file in the working directory is worth looking at.
392 'git read-tree' and other merge-based commands ('git merge', 'git
393 checkout'...) can help maintaining the skip-worktree bitmap and working
394 directory update. `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` is used to
395 define the skip-worktree reference bitmap. When 'git read-tree' needs
396 to update the working directory, it resets the skip-worktree bit in the index
397 based on this file, which uses the same syntax as .gitignore files.
398 If an entry matches a pattern in this file, skip-worktree will not be
399 set on that entry. Otherwise, skip-worktree will be set.
401 Then it compares the new skip-worktree value with the previous one. If
402 skip-worktree turns from set to unset, it will add the corresponding
403 file back. If it turns from unset to set, that file will be removed.
405 While `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` is usually used to specify what
406 files are in, you can also specify what files are _not_ in, using
407 negate patterns. For example, to remove the file `unwanted`:
414 Another tricky thing is fully repopulating the working directory when you
415 no longer want sparse checkout. You cannot just disable "sparse
416 checkout" because skip-worktree bits are still in the index and your working
417 directory is still sparsely populated. You should re-populate the working
418 directory with the `$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout` file content as
425 Then you can disable sparse checkout. Sparse checkout support in 'git
426 read-tree' and similar commands is disabled by default. You need to
427 turn `core.sparseCheckout` on in order to have sparse checkout
433 linkgit:git-write-tree[1]; linkgit:git-ls-files[1];
438 Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite