2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999
4 @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../info/control
7 @node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top
8 @chapter Control Structures
9 @cindex special forms for control structures
10 @cindex control structures
12 A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}).
13 We control the order of execution of these forms by enclosing them in
14 @dfn{control structures}. Control structures are special forms which
15 control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they
18 The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form
19 @var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you
20 write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
21 level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order
22 written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function
23 body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the
24 function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of
25 evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function.
27 Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other
30 Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including
31 other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled)
32 jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are
33 special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not
34 evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control
35 structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).
38 * Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order.
39 * Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}.
40 * Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
41 * Iteration:: @code{while} loops.
42 * Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence.
48 Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way
49 control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a
50 function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a
51 control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest
52 control construct of Lisp.
54 A @code{progn} special form looks like this:
58 (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
63 and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in
64 that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form.
65 The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
66 @code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}.
68 @cindex implicit @code{progn}
69 In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute
70 two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.
71 But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the
72 body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So
73 the body of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'':
74 several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.
75 Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.
76 As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago.
77 It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and},
78 @code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}.
80 @defspec progn forms@dots{}
81 This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
82 order, returning the result of the final form.
86 (progn (print "The first form")
87 (print "The second form")
88 (print "The third form"))
89 @print{} "The first form"
90 @print{} "The second form"
91 @print{} "The third form"
92 @result{} "The third form"
97 Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
100 @defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
101 This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
102 textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.
106 (prog1 (print "The first form")
107 (print "The second form")
108 (print "The third form"))
109 @print{} "The first form"
110 @print{} "The second form"
111 @print{} "The third form"
112 @result{} "The first form"
116 Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
117 @code{x}, then return the value of that former element:
120 (prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
124 @defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
125 This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
126 following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
131 (prog2 (print "The first form")
132 (print "The second form")
133 (print "The third form"))
134 @print{} "The first form"
135 @print{} "The second form"
136 @print{} "The third form"
137 @result{} "The second form"
143 @section Conditionals
144 @cindex conditional evaluation
146 Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp
147 has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in
148 other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of
149 @code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.
151 @defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
152 @code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
153 based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is
154 non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
155 Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
156 value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
157 an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.)
159 If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
160 given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.
162 @code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is
163 never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in the example below,
164 @code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called.
176 @defmac when condition then-forms@dots{}
177 This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms},
178 and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular,
181 (when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
185 is entirely equivalent to
188 (if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil)
192 @defmac unless condition forms@dots{}
193 This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}:
196 (unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
200 is entirely equivalent to
203 (if @var{condition} nil
204 @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
208 @defspec cond clause@dots{}
209 @code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each
210 @var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this
211 list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
212 @var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this:
215 (@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
218 @code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
219 @var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is
220 non-@code{nil}, the clause ``succeeds''; then @code{cond} evaluates its
221 @var{body-forms}, and the value of the last of @var{body-forms} becomes
222 the value of the @code{cond}. The remaining clauses are ignored.
224 If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails'', so
225 the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its
228 If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
229 fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.
231 A clause may also look like this:
238 Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of
239 @var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form.
241 The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
242 the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
247 (cond ((numberp x) x)
250 (setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
251 (buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause}
252 ((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
256 Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous
257 clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the
258 @var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
259 @var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is
260 never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond}
268 (cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo)
275 This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a}
276 is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
279 Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with
280 @code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style.
285 (if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
287 (cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
291 @node Combining Conditions
292 @section Constructs for Combining Conditions
294 This section describes three constructs that are often used together
295 with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The
296 constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
297 kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
300 This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
301 @code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
302 The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
303 using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
306 @defspec and conditions@dots{}
307 The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
308 true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
311 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
312 of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
313 @var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring
314 the remaining @var{conditions}.
316 If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
317 the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just
318 @code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate
319 because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think
320 about it; which one did not?)
322 Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
323 not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
324 which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
325 remaining condition is never evaluated.
329 (and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
336 Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:
340 (if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
341 (message "foo is a list starting with x"))
346 Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
347 @code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.
349 @code{and} can be expressed in terms of either @code{if} or @code{cond}.
354 (and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
356 (if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
358 (cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
363 @defspec or conditions@dots{}
364 The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
365 @var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the
366 @var{conditions} one by one in the order written.
368 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
369 the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns
370 right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it
371 returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated.
373 If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
374 expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no
375 @var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the
376 @var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one
379 For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either
380 @code{nil} or the integer zero:
383 (or (eq x nil) (eq x 0))
386 Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
387 @code{cond}. For example:
391 (or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
399 You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:
403 (if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
404 (if @var{arg2} @var{arg2}
410 This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
411 @var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
412 @var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
420 Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For
421 example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element
422 of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this
423 in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}:
425 @defspec while condition forms@dots{}
426 @code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is
427 non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it
428 reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
429 evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition}
430 evaluates to @code{nil}.
432 There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop
433 will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
434 until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).
436 The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.
445 (princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
447 @print{} Iteration 0.
448 @print{} Iteration 1.
449 @print{} Iteration 2.
450 @print{} Iteration 3.
455 To write a ``repeat...until'' loop, which will execute something on each
456 iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the
457 end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as
464 (not (looking-at "^$"))))
469 This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it
470 reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no
471 body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point).
474 The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to
475 write two common kinds of loops.
477 @defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{}
479 This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of @var{list},
480 using the variable @var{var} to hold the current element. Then it
481 returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if
482 @var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you could use
483 @code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function:
486 (defun reverse (list)
488 (dolist (elt list value)
489 (setq value (cons elt value)))))
493 @defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{}
495 This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0
496 (inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), using the variable @var{var} to
497 hold the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value
498 of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted.
499 Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} do something 100 times:
503 (insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n"))
508 @section Nonlocal Exits
509 @cindex nonlocal exits
511 A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
512 program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
513 as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
514 Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
518 * Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
519 * Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
520 * Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled.
521 * Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
524 @node Catch and Throw
525 @subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}
527 Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
528 construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
529 rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
530 request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
531 only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
532 that @code{catch}. For example:
549 The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to
550 the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code
551 following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of
552 @code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}.
554 The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the
555 first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is
556 @code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more
557 than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.
558 Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and
559 the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that
560 @code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching
561 @code{catch} in between).
563 Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching
564 @code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such as
565 @code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings are
566 unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally
567 (@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer
568 and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and
569 the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window
570 selection saved by @code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window
571 Configurations}). It also runs any cleanups established with the
572 @code{unwind-protect} special form when it exits that form
575 The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
576 that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function
577 called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place
578 chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
579 before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why
580 @code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
581 that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).
583 @cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
585 @b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
586 have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
587 @code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only
591 @defspec catch tag body@dots{}
592 @cindex tag on run time stack
593 @code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.
594 The return point is distinguished from other such return points by
595 @var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument
596 @var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established.
598 With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the
599 @var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without
600 error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from
603 If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body},
604 specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits
605 immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the
606 second argument of @code{throw}.
609 @defun throw tag value
610 The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
611 established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
612 among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
613 specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag},
614 the innermost one is used.
616 The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
620 If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
621 error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
624 @node Examples of Catch
625 @subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}
627 One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
628 nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to''.)
629 Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
641 (throw 'loop (list i j)))
648 If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
649 list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
650 @code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
651 is the result of the @code{while}.
653 Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
654 return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag,
667 (print (catch2 'hack))
675 Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
676 the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore,
677 @code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
678 printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
679 @code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.
681 Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:
686 (print (catch2 'quux))
693 We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has
694 the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.
695 Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value
696 @code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the
697 body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated.
703 When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
704 cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.
706 When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an
707 error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is
708 the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
709 the end of the buffer.
711 In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
712 For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
713 structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before
714 the program is finished. In such cases, you would use
715 @code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
716 evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may
717 wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.
718 In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish
719 @dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error.
721 Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
722 one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}
723 instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}.
726 * Signaling Errors:: How to report an error.
727 * Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error.
728 * Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution.
729 * Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them.
732 @node Signaling Errors
733 @subsubsection How to Signal an Error
734 @cindex signaling errors
736 @dfn{Signalling} an error means beginning error processing. Error
737 processing normally aborts all or part of the running program and
738 returns to a point that is set up to handle the error
739 (@pxref{Processing of Errors}). Here we describe how to signal an
742 Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives
743 which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
744 @sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
745 buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
746 @code{error} and @code{signal}.
748 Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not
749 considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error.
752 Every error specifies an error message, one way or another. The
753 message should state what is wrong (``File does not exist''), not how
754 things ought to be (``File must exist''). The convention in Emacs
755 Lisp is that error messages should start with a capital letter, but
756 should not end with any sort of punctuation.
758 @defun error format-string &rest args
759 This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
760 applying @code{format} (@pxref{String Conversion}) to
761 @var{format-string} and @var{args}.
763 These examples show typical uses of @code{error}:
767 (error "That is an error -- try something else")
768 @error{} That is an error -- try something else
772 (error "You have committed %d errors" 10)
773 @error{} You have committed 10 errors
777 @code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
778 error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
781 @strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message
782 verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string}
783 contains @samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with
784 undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}.
787 @defun signal error-symbol data
788 This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The
789 argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to the
790 circumstances of the error.
792 The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
793 bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of
794 condition names. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different sorts of
797 The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
798 @var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error,
799 there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type
800 that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type.
801 @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols.
803 Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
804 handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local
805 variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
806 @var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}). If the error is not handled,
807 these two values are used in printing the error message.
809 The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions
810 it could sometimes return).
814 (signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
815 @error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
819 (signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition"))
820 @error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition"
825 @cindex CL note---no continuable errors
827 @b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
828 concept of continuable errors.
831 @node Processing of Errors
832 @subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors
834 When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active
835 @dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp
836 expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the
837 Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is
838 executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler
839 executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that
840 established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case}
841 have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them.
843 If there is no applicable handler for the error, the current command is
844 terminated and control returns to the editor command loop, because the
845 command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors. The
846 command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to
847 print an error message.
849 @cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
850 An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The
851 debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error
852 Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs
853 in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of
854 variables precisely as they were at the time of the error.
856 @node Handling Errors
857 @subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
858 @cindex error handler
859 @cindex handling errors
861 The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command
862 that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop.
863 You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
864 establishing an error handler, with the special form
865 @code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this:
870 (delete-file filename)
876 This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
877 returning @code{nil} if an error occurs.
879 The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
880 @dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a
881 call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when
882 this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
883 They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they
884 are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in
885 their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly
886 speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
887 @code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
888 protected form itself.
890 The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler
891 lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
892 which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error
893 is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies
894 to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example
895 above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
896 @code{error}, which covers all errors.
898 The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
899 starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested
900 @code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of
901 the two gets to handle it.
903 If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this
904 ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if
905 @code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger.
906 @xref{Error Debugging}. If you want to be able to debug errors that are
907 caught by a @code{condition-case}, set the variable
908 @code{debug-on-signal} to a non-@code{nil} value.
910 When an error is handled, control returns to the handler. Before this
911 happens, Emacs unbinds all variable bindings made by binding constructs
912 that are being exited and executes the cleanups of all
913 @code{unwind-protect} forms that are exited. Once control arrives at
914 the handler, the body of the handler is executed.
916 After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the
917 @code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited
918 completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume
919 execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
920 bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is
921 clean up and proceed.
923 The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that
924 are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
925 @code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are
926 totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
929 Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
930 @code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate
931 facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a
932 @code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using
933 @code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error
934 that can be handled).
936 @defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
937 This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
938 the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes
939 without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
940 @code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
941 no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
942 error occurs during @var{protected-form}.
944 Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
945 @var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name
946 to be handled, or a list of condition names; @var{body} is one or more
947 Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.
948 Here are examples of handlers:
954 (arith-error (message "Division by zero"))
956 ((arith-error file-error)
958 "Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
962 Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what
963 kind of error it is. The @code{error-conditions} property of this
964 symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs
965 searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that
966 specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching
967 @code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this
968 @code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error.
970 After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case}
971 returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body
972 as the overall value.
974 @cindex error description
975 The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not
976 bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
977 handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an
978 @dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the
979 error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol}
980 . @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to
981 do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file
982 name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the
985 If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the
986 error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler.
989 @defun error-message-string error-description
990 This function returns the error message string for a given error
991 descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the
992 usual error message for that error.
995 @cindex @code{arith-error} example
996 Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
997 that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error
998 message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number.
1002 (defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
1004 ;; @r{Protected form.}
1005 (/ dividend divisor)
1009 (arith-error ; @r{Condition.}
1010 ;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.}
1011 (message "%s" (error-message-string err))
1013 @result{} safe-divide
1018 @print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
1024 The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}. Thus,
1029 @error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
1033 Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
1034 including those signaled with @code{error}:
1046 ;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
1047 (error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz))
1048 ;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
1049 (error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err))
1051 @print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35")
1057 @subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
1058 @cindex error symbol
1060 @cindex condition name
1061 @cindex user-defined error
1062 @kindex error-conditions
1064 When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
1065 the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one
1066 error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of
1067 errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language.
1069 These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
1070 classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
1071 names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
1072 themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also
1073 condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
1074 @code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors. Thus, each error has
1075 one or more condition names: @code{error}, the error symbol if that
1076 is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some intermediate
1079 In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must have an
1080 @code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names.
1081 This list defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to.
1082 (The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be
1083 members of this list.) Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is
1084 defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols.
1086 In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol
1087 should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to
1088 be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If the
1089 @code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error
1090 message @samp{peculiar error} is used.
1091 @cindex peculiar error
1093 Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:
1099 '(error my-own-errors new-error))
1100 @result{} (error my-own-errors new-error)
1103 (put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error")
1104 @result{} "A new error"
1109 This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
1110 classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
1111 classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
1113 The error string should start with a capital letter but it should
1114 not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs.
1116 Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only
1117 an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Signaling Errors}) in your
1122 (signal 'new-error '(x y))
1123 @error{} A new error: x, y
1127 This error can be handled through any of the three condition names.
1128 This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
1129 @code{my-own-errors}:
1135 (my-own-errors nil))
1139 The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
1140 names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol
1141 serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
1142 and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give
1143 @code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol.
1145 By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
1146 seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names
1147 make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
1148 when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would
1149 eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.
1151 @xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols
1152 and their conditions.
1155 @subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits
1157 The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
1158 temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
1159 you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or throw.
1161 @defspec unwind-protect body cleanup-forms@dots{}
1162 @cindex cleanup forms
1163 @cindex protected forms
1164 @cindex error cleanup
1166 @code{unwind-protect} executes the @var{body} with a guarantee that the
1167 @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves @var{body}, no
1168 matter how that happens. The @var{body} may complete normally, or
1169 execute a @code{throw} out of the @code{unwind-protect}, or cause an
1170 error; in all cases, the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.
1172 If the @var{body} forms finish normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns
1173 the value of the last @var{body} form, after it evaluates the
1174 @var{cleanup-forms}. If the @var{body} forms do not finish,
1175 @code{unwind-protect} does not return any value in the normal sense.
1177 Only the @var{body} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any
1178 of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a
1179 @code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not}
1180 guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the
1181 @var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect it
1182 with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.
1184 The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
1185 together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
1186 @code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Local Variables}).
1189 For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
1190 make sure to kill it before finishing:
1195 (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
1199 (kill-buffer buffer))))
1204 You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
1205 (current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
1206 However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body} happens to get an
1207 error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively, you could
1208 write another @code{save-excursion} around the body, to ensure that the
1209 temporary buffer becomes current again in time to kill it.)
1211 Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which
1212 expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Current Buffer}).
1213 Several of the macros defined in this manual use @code{unwind-protect}
1217 Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a
1218 process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
1219 machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
1220 numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it
1221 is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the
1222 event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless
1230 (setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
1231 (if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
1232 (message "Logged in")
1233 (error "Ftp login failed")))
1234 (or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
1238 This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
1239 quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
1240 @code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
1241 set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug,
1242 but at least it is very unlikely.