2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998-1999, 2001-2012
4 @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../../info/functions
7 @node Functions, Macros, Variables, Top
10 A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter
11 explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to
15 * What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology.
16 * Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects.
17 * Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function.
18 * Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions.
19 * Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function.
20 * Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc.
21 * Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names.
22 * Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition
24 * Closures:: Functions that enclose a lexical environment.
25 * Obsolete Functions:: Declaring functions obsolete.
26 * Inline Functions:: Functions that the compiler will expand inline.
27 * Declaring Functions:: Telling the compiler that a function is defined.
28 * Function Safety:: Determining whether a function is safe to call.
29 * Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives
30 that have a special bearing on how functions work.
33 @node What Is a Function
34 @section What Is a Function?
37 @cindex value of function
39 In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying out a
40 computation given input values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of
41 the computation is called the @dfn{value} or @dfn{return value} of the
42 function. The computation can also have side effects, such as lasting
43 changes in the values of variables or the contents of data structures.
45 In most computer languages, every function has a name. But in Lisp,
46 a function in the strictest sense has no name: it is an object which
47 can @emph{optionally} be associated with a symbol (e.g.@: @code{car})
48 that serves as the function name. @xref{Function Names}. When a
49 function has been given a name, we usually also refer to that symbol
50 as a ``function'' (e.g.@: we refer to ``the function @code{car}'').
51 In this manual, the distinction between a function name and the
52 function object itself is usually unimportant, but we will take note
53 wherever it is relevant.
55 Certain function-like objects, called @dfn{special forms} and
56 @dfn{macros}, also accept arguments to carry out computations.
57 However, as explained below, these are not considered functions in
60 Here are important terms for functions and function-like objects:
63 @item lambda expression
64 A function (in the strict sense, i.e.@: a function object) which is
65 written in Lisp. These are described in the following section.
67 @xref{Lambda Expressions}.
73 @cindex built-in function
74 A function which is callable from Lisp but is actually written in C.
75 Primitives are also called @dfn{built-in functions}, or @dfn{subrs}.
76 Examples include functions like @code{car} and @code{append}. In
77 addition, all special forms (see below) are also considered
80 Usually, a function is implemented as a primitive because it is a
81 fundamental part of Lisp (e.g.@: @code{car}), or because it provides a
82 low-level interface to operating system services, or because it needs
83 to run fast. Unlike functions defined in Lisp, primitives can be
84 modified or added only by changing the C sources and recompiling
85 Emacs. See @ref{Writing Emacs Primitives}.
88 A primitive that is like a function but does not evaluate all of its
89 arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only some of the
90 arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or several times.
91 Examples include @code{if}, @code{and}, and @code{while}.
96 A construct defined in Lisp, which differs from a function in that it
97 translates a Lisp expression into another expression which is to be
98 evaluated instead of the original expression. Macros enable Lisp
99 programmers to do the sorts of things that special forms can do.
104 An object which can be invoked via the @code{command-execute}
105 primitive, usually due to the user typing in a key sequence
106 @dfn{bound} to that command. @xref{Interactive Call}. A command is
107 usually a function; if the function is written in Lisp, it is made
108 into a command by an @code{interactive} form in the function
109 definition (@pxref{Defining Commands}). Commands that are functions
110 can also be called from Lisp expressions, just like other functions.
112 Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though
113 they are not functions. @xref{Keyboard Macros}. We say that a symbol
114 is a command if its function cell contains a command (@pxref{Symbol
115 Components}); such a @dfn{named command} can be invoked with
119 A function object that is much like a lambda expression, except that
120 it also encloses an ``environment'' of lexical variable bindings.
123 @item byte-code function
124 A function that has been compiled by the byte compiler.
125 @xref{Byte-Code Type}.
127 @item autoload object
128 @cindex autoload object
129 A place-holder for a real function. If the autoload object is called,
130 Emacs loads the file containing the definition of the real function,
131 and then calls the real function. @xref{Autoload}.
134 You can use the function @code{functionp} to test if an object is a
137 @defun functionp object
138 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is any kind of
139 function, i.e.@: can be passed to @code{funcall}. Note that
140 @code{functionp} returns @code{t} for symbols that are function names,
141 and returns @code{nil} for special forms.
145 Unlike @code{functionp}, the next three functions do @emph{not} treat
146 a symbol as its function definition.
149 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function
150 (i.e., a Lisp primitive).
154 (subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,}
155 @result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.}
158 (subrp (symbol-function 'message))
164 @defun byte-code-function-p object
165 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a byte-code
166 function. For example:
170 (byte-code-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line))
176 @defun subr-arity subr
177 This function provides information about the argument list of a
178 primitive, @var{subr}. The returned value is a pair
179 @code{(@var{min} . @var{max})}. @var{min} is the minimum number of
180 args. @var{max} is the maximum number or the symbol @code{many}, for a
181 function with @code{&rest} arguments, or the symbol @code{unevalled} if
182 @var{subr} is a special form.
185 @node Lambda Expressions
186 @section Lambda Expressions
187 @cindex lambda expression
189 A lambda expression is a function object written in Lisp. Here is
194 "Return the hyperbolic cosine of X."
195 (* 0.5 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))
199 In Emacs Lisp, such a list is valid as an expression---it evaluates to
200 itself. But its main use is not to be evaluated as an expression, but
201 to be called as a function.
203 A lambda expression, by itself, has no name; it is an @dfn{anonymous
204 function}. Although lambda expressions can be used this way
205 (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), they are more commonly associated with
206 symbols to make @dfn{named functions} (@pxref{Function Names}).
207 Before going into these details, the following subsections describe
208 the components of a lambda expression and what they do.
211 * Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression.
212 * Simple Lambda:: A simple example.
213 * Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists.
214 * Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function.
217 @node Lambda Components
218 @subsection Components of a Lambda Expression
220 A lambda expression is a list that looks like this:
223 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
224 [@var{documentation-string}]
225 [@var{interactive-declaration}]
226 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
230 The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol
231 @code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The
232 reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that
233 other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as
236 The second element is a list of symbols---the argument variable names.
237 This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called,
238 the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda
239 list, which are given local bindings with the values provided.
240 @xref{Local Variables}.
242 The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the
243 function definition to describe the function for the Emacs help
244 facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}.
246 The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive
247 @var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the
248 function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called
249 @dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key.
250 Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive
251 declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive
254 @cindex body of function
255 The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp
256 code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say,
257 ``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the
258 function is the value returned by the last element of the body.
261 @subsection A Simple Lambda Expression Example
263 Consider the following example:
266 (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
270 We can call this function by writing it as the @sc{car} of an
271 expression, like this:
275 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
281 This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable
282 @code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3.
283 Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6;
284 therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6.
286 Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in
291 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
297 This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5
298 4)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the
299 argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8.
301 As these examples show, you can use a form with a lambda expression
302 as its @sc{car} to make local variables and give them values. In the
303 old days of Lisp, this technique was the only way to bind and
304 initialize local variables. But nowadays, it is clearer to use the
305 special form @code{let} for this purpose (@pxref{Local Variables}).
306 Lambda expressions are mainly used as anonymous functions for passing
307 as arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), or
308 stored as symbol function definitions to produce named functions
309 (@pxref{Function Names}).
312 @subsection Other Features of Argument Lists
313 @kindex wrong-number-of-arguments
314 @cindex argument binding
315 @cindex binding arguments
316 @cindex argument lists, features
318 Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))},
319 specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three
320 arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four
321 arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error.
323 It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain
324 arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{substring}
325 accepts three arguments---a string, the start index and the end
326 index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the
327 string if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to
328 accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list}
331 @cindex optional arguments
332 @cindex rest arguments
335 To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function
336 is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional
337 arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the
338 keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument.
340 Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
344 (@var{required-vars}@dots{}
345 @r{[}&optional @var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]}
346 @r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]})
351 The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
352 clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
354 A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
355 @var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of
356 the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond
357 that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may
358 be any number of extra actual arguments.
360 If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted,
361 then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the
362 function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and
363 an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to
364 consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value.
365 This is what @code{substring} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to
366 @code{substring} means to use the length of the string supplied.
368 @cindex CL note---default optional arg
370 @b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what
371 default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp
372 always uses @code{nil}. Emacs Lisp does not support ``supplied-p''
373 variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
376 For example, an argument list that looks like this:
379 (a b &optional c d &rest e)
383 binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are
384 required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and
385 @code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first
386 four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list. If
387 there are only two arguments, @code{c} is @code{nil}; if two or three
388 arguments, @code{d} is @code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e}
391 There is no way to have required arguments following optional
392 ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose
393 that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required.
394 Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the
395 third argument be for? Would it be used for the @var{c}, or for
396 @var{d}? One can argue for both possibilities. Similarly, it makes
397 no sense to have any more arguments (either required or optional)
398 after a @code{&rest} argument.
400 Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
403 ((lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:}
404 1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.}
406 ((lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:}
407 (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.}
410 ((lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:}
411 (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.}
416 @node Function Documentation
417 @subsection Documentation Strings of Functions
418 @cindex documentation of function
420 A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string}
421 just after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of
422 the function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment
423 which actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the
424 Emacs help facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the
425 documentation string is accessed.
427 It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the
428 functions in your program, even those that are called only from within
429 your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they
430 are easier to access.
432 The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own,
433 because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist
434 of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose.
436 The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the
437 source file, but since these spaces come before the starting
438 double-quote, they are not part of the string. Some people make a
439 practice of indenting any additional lines of the string so that the
440 text lines up in the program source. @emph{That is a mistake.} The
441 indentation of the following lines is inside the string; what looks
442 nice in the source code will look ugly when displayed by the help
445 You may wonder how the documentation string could be optional, since
446 there are required components of the function that follow it (the body).
447 Since evaluation of a string returns that string, without any side effects,
448 it has no effect if it is not the last form in the body. Thus, in
449 practice, there is no confusion between the first form of the body and the
450 documentation string; if the only body form is a string then it serves both
451 as the return value and as the documentation.
453 The last line of the documentation string can specify calling
454 conventions different from the actual function arguments. Write
462 following a blank line, at the beginning of the line, with no newline
463 following it inside the documentation string. (The @samp{\} is used
464 to avoid confusing the Emacs motion commands.) The calling convention
465 specified in this way appears in help messages in place of the one
466 derived from the actual arguments of the function.
468 This feature is particularly useful for macro definitions, since the
469 arguments written in a macro definition often do not correspond to the
470 way users think of the parts of the macro call.
473 @section Naming a Function
474 @cindex function definition
475 @cindex named function
476 @cindex function name
478 A symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens when the
479 symbol's @dfn{function cell} (@pxref{Symbol Components}) contains a
480 function object (e.g.@: a lambda expression). Then the symbol itself
481 becomes a valid, callable function, equivalent to the function object
482 in its function cell.
484 The contents of the function cell are also called the symbol's
485 @dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a symbol's function
486 definition in place of the symbol is called @dfn{symbol function
487 indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}. If you have not given a
488 symbol a function definition, its function cell is said to be
489 @dfn{void}, and it cannot be used as a function.
491 In practice, nearly all functions have names, and are referred to by
492 their names. You can create a named Lisp function by defining a
493 lambda expression and putting it in a function cell (@pxref{Function
494 Cells}). However, it is more common to use the @code{defun} special
495 form, described in the next section.
497 @xref{Defining Functions}.
500 We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by
501 their names in Lisp expressions. Also, a named Lisp function can
502 easily refer to itself---it can be recursive. Furthermore, primitives
503 can only be referred to textually by their names, since primitive
504 function objects (@pxref{Primitive Function Type}) have no read
507 A function need not have a unique name. A given function object
508 @emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only one symbol, but
509 this is just a convention. It is easy to store it in several symbols
510 using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is a valid name for the
513 Note that a symbol used as a function name may also be used as a
514 variable; these two uses of a symbol are independent and do not
515 conflict. (This is not the case in some dialects of Lisp, like
518 @node Defining Functions
519 @section Defining Functions
520 @cindex defining a function
522 We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This
523 is called @dfn{defining a function}, and it is done with the
524 @code{defun} special form.
526 @defspec defun name argument-list body-forms...
527 @code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It
528 defines the symbol @var{name} as a function that looks like this:
531 (lambda @var{argument-list} . @var{body-forms})
534 @code{defun} stores this lambda expression in the function cell of
535 @var{name}. It returns the value @var{name}, but usually we ignore this
538 As described previously, @var{argument-list} is a list of argument
539 names and may include the keywords @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}.
540 Also, the first two of the @var{body-forms} may be a documentation
541 string and an interactive declaration. @xref{Lambda Components}.
543 Here are some examples:
556 (defun bar (a &optional b &rest c)
562 @result{} (1 2 (3 4 5))
566 @result{} (1 nil nil)
570 @error{} Wrong number of arguments.
574 (defun capitalize-backwards ()
575 "Upcase the last letter of the word at point."
581 @result{} capitalize-backwards
585 Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally.
586 @code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car}
587 without any hesitation or notification. Emacs does not prevent you
588 from doing this, because redefining a function is sometimes done
589 deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish deliberate
590 redefinition from unintentional redefinition.
593 @cindex function aliases
594 @defun defalias name definition &optional docstring
595 @anchor{Definition of defalias}
596 This special form defines the symbol @var{name} as a function, with
597 definition @var{definition} (which can be any valid Lisp function).
598 It returns @var{definition}.
600 If @var{docstring} is non-@code{nil}, it becomes the function
601 documentation of @var{name}. Otherwise, any documentation provided by
602 @var{definition} is used.
604 The proper place to use @code{defalias} is where a specific function
605 name is being defined---especially where that name appears explicitly in
606 the source file being loaded. This is because @code{defalias} records
607 which file defined the function, just like @code{defun}
610 By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other
611 purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such
612 records. @xref{Function Cells}.
615 You cannot create a new primitive function with @code{defun} or
616 @code{defalias}, but you can use them to change the function definition of
617 any symbol, even one such as @code{car} or @code{x-popup-menu} whose
618 normal definition is a primitive. However, this is risky: for
619 instance, it is next to impossible to redefine @code{car} without
620 breaking Lisp completely. Redefining an obscure function such as
621 @code{x-popup-menu} is less dangerous, but it still may not work as
622 you expect. If there are calls to the primitive from C code, they
623 call the primitive's C definition directly, so changing the symbol's
624 definition will have no effect on them.
626 See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun}
627 and tells the Lisp compiler to perform inline expansion on it.
628 @xref{Inline Functions}.
630 @node Calling Functions
631 @section Calling Functions
632 @cindex function invocation
633 @cindex calling a function
635 Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do
636 anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a
637 function is also known as @dfn{invocation}.
639 The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list.
640 For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the
641 function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}.
642 @xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation.
644 When you write a list as an expression in your program, you specify
645 which function to call, and how many arguments to give it, in the text
646 of the program. Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you
647 need to compute at run time which function to call. To do that, use
648 the function @code{funcall}. When you also need to determine at run
649 time how many arguments to pass, use @code{apply}.
651 @defun funcall function &rest arguments
652 @code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns
653 whatever @var{function} returns.
655 Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including
656 @var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This
657 means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be
658 called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the
659 expressions you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values.
660 These values are @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of
661 calling @var{function}; the operation of @code{funcall} is like the
662 normal procedure for calling a function, once its arguments have
663 already been evaluated.
665 The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a
666 primitive function. Special forms and macros are not allowed, because
667 they make sense only when given the ``unevaluated'' argument
668 expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw
669 above, it never knows them in the first place.
681 (funcall f 'x 'y '(z))
686 @error{} Invalid function: #<subr and>
690 Compare these examples with the examples of @code{apply}.
693 @defun apply function &rest arguments
694 @code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like
695 @code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a
696 list of objects, which are passed to @var{function} as separate
697 arguments, rather than a single list. We say that @code{apply}
698 @dfn{spreads} this list so that each individual element becomes an
701 @code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with
702 @code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a
703 primitive function; special forms and macros do not make sense in
713 @error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z
716 (apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4))
720 (apply '+ '(1 2 3 4))
725 (apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil))
726 @result{} (a b c x y z)
730 For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see @ref{Definition
734 @cindex partial application of functions
736 Sometimes it is useful to fix some of the function's arguments at
737 certain values, and leave the rest of arguments for when the function
738 is actually called. The act of fixing some of the function's
739 arguments is called @dfn{partial application} of the function@footnote{
740 This is related to, but different from @dfn{currying}, which
741 transforms a function that takes multiple arguments in such a way that
742 it can be called as a chain of functions, each one with a single
744 The result is a new function that accepts the rest of
745 arguments and calls the original function with all the arguments
748 Here's how to do partial application in Emacs Lisp:
750 @defun apply-partially func &rest args
751 This function returns a new function which, when called, will call
752 @var{func} with the list of arguments composed from @var{args} and
753 additional arguments specified at the time of the call. If @var{func}
754 accepts @var{n} arguments, then a call to @code{apply-partially} with
755 @w{@code{@var{m} < @var{n}}} arguments will produce a new function of
756 @w{@code{@var{n} - @var{m}}} arguments.
758 Here's how we could define the built-in function @code{1+}, if it
759 didn't exist, using @code{apply-partially} and @code{+}, another
764 (defalias '1+ (apply-partially '+ 1)
765 "Increment argument by one.")
775 It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or
776 find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property
777 lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions
778 that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}.
780 Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op
781 function as the argument. Here are two different kinds of no-op
785 This function returns @var{arg} and has no side effects.
788 @defun ignore &rest args
789 This function ignores any arguments and returns @code{nil}.
792 Some functions are user-visible @dfn{commands}, which can be called
793 interactively (usually by a key sequence). It is possible to invoke
794 such a command exactly as though it was called interactively, by using
795 the @code{call-interactively} function. @xref{Interactive Call}.
797 @node Mapping Functions
798 @section Mapping Functions
799 @cindex mapping functions
801 A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function (@emph{not} a
802 special form or macro) to each element of a list or other collection.
803 Emacs Lisp has several such functions; this section describes
804 @code{mapcar}, @code{mapc}, and @code{mapconcat}, which map over a
805 list. @xref{Definition of mapatoms}, for the function @code{mapatoms}
806 which maps over the symbols in an obarray. @xref{Definition of
807 maphash}, for the function @code{maphash} which maps over key/value
808 associations in a hash table.
810 These mapping functions do not allow char-tables because a char-table
811 is a sparse array whose nominal range of indices is very large. To map
812 over a char-table in a way that deals properly with its sparse nature,
813 use the function @code{map-char-table} (@pxref{Char-Tables}).
815 @defun mapcar function sequence
816 @anchor{Definition of mapcar}
817 @code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence}
818 in turn, and returns a list of the results.
820 The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence except a
821 char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a string. The
822 result is always a list. The length of the result is the same as the
823 length of @var{sequence}. For example:
827 (mapcar 'car '((a b) (c d) (e f)))
831 (mapcar 'string "abc")
832 @result{} ("a" "b" "c")
836 ;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.}
837 (mapcar 'funcall my-hooks)
841 (defun mapcar* (function &rest args)
842 "Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS.
843 Return the list of results."
844 ;; @r{If no list is exhausted,}
845 (if (not (memq nil args))
846 ;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.}
847 (cons (apply function (mapcar 'car args))
848 (apply 'mapcar* function
849 ;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.}
850 (mapcar 'cdr args)))))
854 (mapcar* 'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4))
855 @result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3))
860 @defun mapc function sequence
861 @code{mapc} is like @code{mapcar} except that @var{function} is used for
862 side-effects only---the values it returns are ignored, not collected
863 into a list. @code{mapc} always returns @var{sequence}.
866 @defun mapconcat function sequence separator
867 @code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of
868 @var{sequence}: the results, which must be strings, are concatenated.
869 Between each pair of result strings, @code{mapconcat} inserts the string
870 @var{separator}. Usually @var{separator} contains a space or comma or
871 other suitable punctuation.
873 The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one
874 argument and return a string. The argument @var{sequence} can be any
875 kind of sequence except a char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a
876 bool-vector, or a string.
880 (mapconcat 'symbol-name
881 '(The cat in the hat)
883 @result{} "The cat in the hat"
887 (mapconcat (function (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x))))
895 @node Anonymous Functions
896 @section Anonymous Functions
897 @cindex anonymous function
899 Although functions are usually defined with @code{defun} and given
900 names at the same time, it is sometimes convenient to use an explicit
901 lambda expression---an @dfn{anonymous function}. Anonymous functions
902 are valid wherever function names are. They are often assigned as
903 variable values, or as arguments to functions; for instance, you might
904 pass one as the @var{function} argument to @code{mapcar}, which
905 applies that function to each element of a list (@pxref{Mapping
906 Functions}). @xref{describe-symbols example}, for a realistic example
909 When defining a lambda expression that is to be used as an anonymous
910 function, you can in principle use any method to construct the list.
911 But typically you should use the @code{lambda} macro, or the
912 @code{function} special form, or the @code{#'} read syntax:
914 @defmac lambda args body...
915 This macro returns an anonymous function with argument list @var{args}
916 and body forms given by @var{body}. In effect, this macro makes
917 @code{lambda} forms ``self-quoting'': evaluating a form whose @sc{car}
918 is @code{lambda} yields the form itself:
922 @result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))
925 The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs
926 evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using
927 @code{function} as a subroutine (see below).
930 @defspec function function-object
931 @cindex function quoting
932 This special form returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it.
933 In this, it is similar to @code{quote} (@pxref{Quoting}). But unlike
934 @code{quote}, it also serves as a note to the Emacs evaluator and
935 byte-compiler that @var{function-object} is intended to be used as a
936 function. Assuming @var{function-object} is a valid lambda
937 expression, this has two effects:
941 When the code is byte-compiled, @var{function-object} is compiled into
942 a byte-code function object (@pxref{Byte Compilation}).
945 When lexical binding is enabled, @var{function-object} is converted
946 into a closure. @xref{Closures}.
950 @cindex @samp{#'} syntax
951 The read syntax @code{#'} is a short-hand for using @code{function}.
952 The following forms are all equivalent:
956 (function (lambda (x) (* x x)))
957 #'(lambda (x) (* x x))
960 In the following example, we define a @code{change-property}
961 function that takes a function as its third argument, followed by a
962 @code{double-property} function that makes use of
963 @code{change-property} by passing it an anonymous function:
967 (defun change-property (symbol prop function)
968 (let ((value (get symbol prop)))
969 (put symbol prop (funcall function value))))
973 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
974 (change-property symbol prop (lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
979 Note that we do not quote the @code{lambda} form.
981 If you compile the above code, the anonymous function is also
982 compiled. This would not happen if, say, you had constructed the
983 anonymous function by quoting it as a list:
987 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
988 (change-property symbol prop '(lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
993 In that case, the anonymous function is kept as a lambda expression in
994 the compiled code. The byte-compiler cannot assume this list is a
995 function, even though it looks like one, since it does not know that
996 @code{change-property} intends to use it as a function.
999 @section Accessing Function Cell Contents
1001 The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the
1002 function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test,
1003 and set the function cell of symbols.
1005 See also the function @code{indirect-function}. @xref{Definition of
1008 @defun symbol-function symbol
1009 @kindex void-function
1010 This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. If the
1011 symbol's function cell is void, a @code{void-function} error is
1014 This function does not check that the returned object is a legitimate
1019 (defun bar (n) (+ n 2))
1023 (symbol-function 'bar)
1024 @result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2))
1031 (symbol-function 'baz)
1037 @cindex void function cell
1038 If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say that
1039 that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the function
1040 cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call such a symbol
1041 as a function, it signals a @code{void-function} error.
1043 Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol
1044 @code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects,
1045 and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be
1046 (and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with
1047 @code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever.
1049 You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with
1050 @code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you
1051 can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}.
1053 @defun fboundp symbol
1054 This function returns @code{t} if the symbol has an object in its
1055 function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object
1056 is a legitimate function.
1059 @defun fmakunbound symbol
1060 This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a
1061 subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a
1062 @code{void-function} error. It returns @var{symbol}. (See also
1063 @code{makunbound}, in @ref{Void Variables}.)
1080 @error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo
1085 @defun fset symbol definition
1086 This function stores @var{definition} in the function cell of
1087 @var{symbol}. The result is @var{definition}. Normally
1088 @var{definition} should be a function or the name of a function, but
1089 this is not checked. The argument @var{symbol} is an ordinary evaluated
1092 The primary use of this function is as a subroutine by constructs that
1093 define or alter functions, like @code{defadvice} (@pxref{Advising
1094 Functions}). (If @code{defun} were not a primitive, it could be
1095 written as a Lisp macro using @code{fset}.) You can also use it to
1096 give a symbol a function definition that is not a list, e.g.@: a
1097 keyboard macro (@pxref{Keyboard Macros}):
1100 ;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.}
1101 (fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k")
1105 It you wish to use @code{fset} to make an alternate name for a
1106 function, consider using @code{defalias} instead. @xref{Definition of
1113 As explained in @ref{Variable Scoping}, Emacs can optionally enable
1114 lexical binding of variables. When lexical binding is enabled, any
1115 named function that you create (e.g.@: with @code{defun}), as well as
1116 any anonymous function that you create using the @code{lambda} macro
1117 or the @code{function} special form or the @code{#'} syntax
1118 (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), is automatically converted into a
1121 A closure is a function that also carries a record of the lexical
1122 environment that existed when the function was defined. When it is
1123 invoked, any lexical variable references within its definition use the
1124 retained lexical environment. In all other respects, closures behave
1125 much like ordinary functions; in particular, they can be called in the
1126 same way as ordinary functions.
1128 @xref{Lexical Binding}, for an example of using a closure.
1130 Currently, an Emacs Lisp closure object is represented by a list
1131 with the symbol @code{closure} as the first element, a list
1132 representing the lexical environment as the second element, and the
1133 argument list and body forms as the remaining elements:
1136 ;; @r{lexical binding is enabled.}
1137 (lambda (x) (* x x))
1138 @result{} (closure (t) (x) (* x x))
1142 However, the fact that the internal structure of a closure is
1143 ``exposed'' to the rest of the Lisp world is considered an internal
1144 implementation detail. For this reason, we recommend against directly
1145 examining or altering the structure of closure objects.
1147 @node Obsolete Functions
1148 @section Declaring Functions Obsolete
1150 You can use @code{make-obsolete} to declare a function obsolete. This
1151 indicates that the function may be removed at some stage in the future.
1153 @defun make-obsolete obsolete-name current-name &optional when
1154 This function makes the byte compiler warn that the function
1155 @var{obsolete-name} is obsolete. If @var{current-name} is a symbol, the
1156 warning message says to use @var{current-name} instead of
1157 @var{obsolete-name}. @var{current-name} does not need to be an alias for
1158 @var{obsolete-name}; it can be a different function with similar
1159 functionality. If @var{current-name} is a string, it is the warning
1162 If provided, @var{when} should be a string indicating when the function
1163 was first made obsolete---for example, a date or a release number.
1166 You can define a function as an alias and declare it obsolete at the
1167 same time using the macro @code{define-obsolete-function-alias}:
1169 @defmac define-obsolete-function-alias obsolete-name current-name &optional when docstring
1170 This macro marks the function @var{obsolete-name} obsolete and also
1171 defines it as an alias for the function @var{current-name}. It is
1172 equivalent to the following:
1175 (defalias @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{docstring})
1176 (make-obsolete @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{when})
1180 In addition, you can mark a certain a particular calling convention
1181 for a function as obsolete:
1183 @defun set-advertised-calling-convention function signature
1184 This function specifies the argument list @var{signature} as the
1185 correct way to call @var{function}. This causes the Emacs byte
1186 compiler to issue a warning whenever it comes across an Emacs Lisp
1187 program that calls @var{function} any other way (however, it will
1188 still allow the code to be byte compiled).
1190 For instance, in old versions of Emacs the @code{sit-for} function
1191 accepted three arguments, like this
1194 (sit-for seconds milliseconds nodisp)
1197 However, calling @code{sit-for} this way is considered obsolete
1198 (@pxref{Waiting}). The old calling convention is deprecated like
1202 (set-advertised-calling-convention
1203 'sit-for '(seconds &optional nodisp))
1207 @node Inline Functions
1208 @section Inline Functions
1209 @cindex inline functions
1211 @defmac defsubst name argument-list body-forms...
1212 Define an inline function. The syntax is exactly the same as
1213 @code{defun} (@pxref{Defining Functions}).
1216 You can define an @dfn{inline function} by using @code{defsubst}
1217 instead of @code{defun}. An inline function works just like an
1218 ordinary function except for one thing: when you byte-compile a call
1219 to the function (@pxref{Byte Compilation}), the function's definition
1220 is expanded into the caller.
1222 Making a function inline often makes its function calls run faster.
1223 But it also has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility;
1224 if you change the definition of the function, calls already inlined
1225 still use the old definition until you recompile them.
1227 Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can
1228 increase the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since
1229 the speed advantage of inline functions is greatest for small
1230 functions, you generally should not make large functions inline.
1232 Also, inline functions do not behave well with respect to debugging,
1233 tracing, and advising (@pxref{Advising Functions}). Since ease of
1234 debugging and the flexibility of redefining functions are important
1235 features of Emacs, you should not make a function inline, even if it's
1236 small, unless its speed is really crucial, and you've timed the code
1237 to verify that using @code{defun} actually has performance problems.
1239 It's possible to define a macro to expand into the same code that an
1240 inline function would execute (@pxref{Macros}). But the macro would
1241 be limited to direct use in expressions---a macro cannot be called
1242 with @code{apply}, @code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work
1243 to convert an ordinary function into a macro. To convert it into an
1244 inline function is easy; just replace @code{defun} with
1245 @code{defsubst}. Since each argument of an inline function is
1246 evaluated exactly once, you needn't worry about how many times the
1247 body uses the arguments, as you do for macros.
1249 After an inline function is defined, its inline expansion can be
1250 performed later on in the same file, just like macros.
1252 @node Declaring Functions
1253 @section Telling the Compiler that a Function is Defined
1254 @cindex function declaration
1255 @cindex declaring functions
1256 @findex declare-function
1258 Byte-compiling a file often produces warnings about functions that the
1259 compiler doesn't know about (@pxref{Compiler Errors}). Sometimes this
1260 indicates a real problem, but usually the functions in question are
1261 defined in other files which would be loaded if that code is run. For
1262 example, byte-compiling @file{fortran.el} used to warn:
1266 fortran.el:2152:1:Warning: the function `gud-find-c-expr' is not known
1270 In fact, @code{gud-find-c-expr} is only used in the function that
1271 Fortran mode uses for the local value of
1272 @code{gud-find-expr-function}, which is a callback from GUD; if it is
1273 called, the GUD functions will be loaded. When you know that such a
1274 warning does not indicate a real problem, it is good to suppress the
1275 warning. That makes new warnings which might mean real problems more
1276 visible. You do that with @code{declare-function}.
1278 All you need to do is add a @code{declare-function} statement before the
1279 first use of the function in question:
1282 (declare-function gud-find-c-expr "gud.el" nil)
1285 This says that @code{gud-find-c-expr} is defined in @file{gud.el} (the
1286 @samp{.el} can be omitted). The compiler takes for granted that that file
1287 really defines the function, and does not check.
1289 The optional third argument specifies the argument list of
1290 @code{gud-find-c-expr}. In this case, it takes no arguments
1291 (@code{nil} is different from not specifying a value). In other
1292 cases, this might be something like @code{(file &optional overwrite)}.
1293 You don't have to specify the argument list, but if you do the
1294 byte compiler can check that the calls match the declaration.
1296 @defmac declare-function function file &optional arglist fileonly
1297 Tell the byte compiler to assume that @var{function} is defined, with
1298 arguments @var{arglist}, and that the definition should come from the
1299 file @var{file}. @var{fileonly} non-@code{nil} means only check that
1300 @var{file} exists, not that it actually defines @var{function}.
1303 To verify that these functions really are declared where
1304 @code{declare-function} says they are, use @code{check-declare-file}
1305 to check all @code{declare-function} calls in one source file, or use
1306 @code{check-declare-directory} check all the files in and under a
1309 These commands find the file that ought to contain a function's
1310 definition using @code{locate-library}; if that finds no file, they
1311 expand the definition file name relative to the directory of the file
1312 that contains the @code{declare-function} call.
1314 You can also say that a function is a primitive by specifying a file
1315 name ending in @samp{.c} or @samp{.m}. This is useful only when you
1316 call a primitive that is defined only on certain systems. Most
1317 primitives are always defined, so they will never give you a warning.
1319 Sometimes a file will optionally use functions from an external package.
1320 If you prefix the filename in the @code{declare-function} statement with
1321 @samp{ext:}, then it will be checked if it is found, otherwise skipped
1324 There are some function definitions that @samp{check-declare} does not
1325 understand (e.g. @code{defstruct} and some other macros). In such cases,
1326 you can pass a non-@code{nil} @var{fileonly} argument to
1327 @code{declare-function}, meaning to only check that the file exists, not
1328 that it actually defines the function. Note that to do this without
1329 having to specify an argument list, you should set the @var{arglist}
1330 argument to @code{t} (because @code{nil} means an empty argument list, as
1331 opposed to an unspecified one).
1333 @node Function Safety
1334 @section Determining whether a Function is Safe to Call
1335 @cindex function safety
1336 @cindex safety of functions
1338 Some major modes such as SES call functions that are stored in user
1339 files. (@inforef{Top, ,ses}, for more information on SES.) User
1340 files sometimes have poor pedigrees---you can get a spreadsheet from
1341 someone you've just met, or you can get one through email from someone
1342 you've never met. So it is risky to call a function whose source code
1343 is stored in a user file until you have determined that it is safe.
1345 @defun unsafep form &optional unsafep-vars
1346 Returns @code{nil} if @var{form} is a @dfn{safe} Lisp expression, or
1347 returns a list that describes why it might be unsafe. The argument
1348 @var{unsafep-vars} is a list of symbols known to have temporary
1349 bindings at this point; it is mainly used for internal recursive
1350 calls. The current buffer is an implicit argument, which provides a
1351 list of buffer-local bindings.
1354 Being quick and simple, @code{unsafep} does a very light analysis and
1355 rejects many Lisp expressions that are actually safe. There are no
1356 known cases where @code{unsafep} returns @code{nil} for an unsafe
1357 expression. However, a ``safe'' Lisp expression can return a string
1358 with a @code{display} property, containing an associated Lisp
1359 expression to be executed after the string is inserted into a buffer.
1360 This associated expression can be a virus. In order to be safe, you
1361 must delete properties from all strings calculated by user code before
1362 inserting them into buffers.
1365 What is a safe Lisp expression? Basically, it's an expression that
1366 calls only built-in functions with no side effects (or only innocuous
1367 ones). Innocuous side effects include displaying messages and
1368 altering non-risky buffer-local variables (but not global variables).
1371 @item Safe expression
1374 An atom or quoted thing.
1376 A call to a safe function (see below), if all its arguments are
1379 One of the special forms @code{and}, @code{catch}, @code{cond},
1380 @code{if}, @code{or}, @code{prog1}, @code{prog2}, @code{progn},
1381 @code{while}, and @code{unwind-protect}], if all its arguments are
1384 A form that creates temporary bindings (@code{condition-case},
1385 @code{dolist}, @code{dotimes}, @code{lambda}, @code{let}, or
1386 @code{let*}), if all args are safe and the symbols to be bound are not
1387 explicitly risky (see @pxref{File Local Variables}).
1389 An assignment using @code{add-to-list}, @code{setq}, @code{push}, or
1390 @code{pop}, if all args are safe and the symbols to be assigned are
1391 not explicitly risky and they already have temporary or buffer-local
1394 One of [apply, mapc, mapcar, mapconcat] if the first argument is a
1395 safe explicit lambda and the other args are safe expressions.
1401 A lambda containing safe expressions.
1403 A symbol on the list @code{safe-functions}, so the user says it's safe.
1405 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{side-effect-free} property.
1407 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{safe-function} property. The
1408 value @code{t} indicates a function that is safe but has innocuous
1409 side effects. Other values will someday indicate functions with
1410 classes of side effects that are not always safe.
1413 The @code{side-effect-free} and @code{safe-function} properties are
1414 provided for built-in functions and for low-level functions and macros
1415 defined in @file{subr.el}. You can assign these properties for the
1416 functions you write.
1420 @node Related Topics
1421 @section Other Topics Related to Functions
1423 Here is a table of several functions that do things related to
1424 function calling and function definitions. They are documented
1425 elsewhere, but we provide cross references here.
1429 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1434 @item call-interactively
1435 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1437 @item called-interactively-p
1438 See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
1441 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1444 See @ref{Accessing Documentation}.
1450 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1453 See @ref{Anonymous Functions}.
1456 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1458 @item indirect-function
1459 See @ref{Function Indirection}.
1462 See @ref{Using Interactive}.
1465 See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
1468 See @ref{Creating Symbols}.
1471 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1473 @item map-char-table
1474 See @ref{Char-Tables}.
1477 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1480 See @ref{Functions for Key Lookup}.