1 @c -*- mode: texinfo; coding: utf-8 -*-
2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998-1999, 2001-2015 Free Software
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
9 A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter
10 explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to
14 * What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology.
15 * Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects.
16 * Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function.
17 * Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions.
18 * Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function.
19 * Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc.
20 * Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names.
21 * Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition
23 * Closures:: Functions that enclose a lexical environment.
24 * Advising Functions:: Adding to the definition of a function.
25 * Obsolete Functions:: Declaring functions obsolete.
26 * Inline Functions:: Functions that the compiler will expand inline.
27 * Declare Form:: Adding additional information about a function.
28 * Declaring Functions:: Telling the compiler that a function is defined.
29 * Function Safety:: Determining whether a function is safe to call.
30 * Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives
31 that have a special bearing on how functions work.
34 @node What Is a Function
35 @section What Is a Function?
38 @cindex value of function
40 In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying out a
41 computation given input values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of
42 the computation is called the @dfn{value} or @dfn{return value} of the
43 function. The computation can also have side effects, such as lasting
44 changes in the values of variables or the contents of data structures.
46 In most computer languages, every function has a name. But in Lisp,
47 a function in the strictest sense has no name: it is an object which
48 can @emph{optionally} be associated with a symbol (e.g., @code{car})
49 that serves as the function name. @xref{Function Names}. When a
50 function has been given a name, we usually also refer to that symbol
51 as a ``function'' (e.g., we refer to ``the function @code{car}'').
52 In this manual, the distinction between a function name and the
53 function object itself is usually unimportant, but we will take note
54 wherever it is relevant.
56 Certain function-like objects, called @dfn{special forms} and
57 @dfn{macros}, also accept arguments to carry out computations.
58 However, as explained below, these are not considered functions in
61 Here are important terms for functions and function-like objects:
64 @item lambda expression
65 A function (in the strict sense, i.e., a function object) which is
66 written in Lisp. These are described in the following section.
68 @xref{Lambda Expressions}.
74 @cindex built-in function
75 A function which is callable from Lisp but is actually written in C@.
76 Primitives are also called @dfn{built-in functions}, or @dfn{subrs}.
77 Examples include functions like @code{car} and @code{append}. In
78 addition, all special forms (see below) are also considered
81 Usually, a function is implemented as a primitive because it is a
82 fundamental part of Lisp (e.g., @code{car}), or because it provides a
83 low-level interface to operating system services, or because it needs
84 to run fast. Unlike functions defined in Lisp, primitives can be
85 modified or added only by changing the C sources and recompiling
86 Emacs. See @ref{Writing Emacs Primitives}.
89 A primitive that is like a function but does not evaluate all of its
90 arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only some of the
91 arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or several times.
92 Examples include @code{if}, @code{and}, and @code{while}.
97 A construct defined in Lisp, which differs from a function in that it
98 translates a Lisp expression into another expression which is to be
99 evaluated instead of the original expression. Macros enable Lisp
100 programmers to do the sorts of things that special forms can do.
105 An object which can be invoked via the @code{command-execute}
106 primitive, usually due to the user typing in a key sequence
107 @dfn{bound} to that command. @xref{Interactive Call}. A command is
108 usually a function; if the function is written in Lisp, it is made
109 into a command by an @code{interactive} form in the function
110 definition (@pxref{Defining Commands}). Commands that are functions
111 can also be called from Lisp expressions, just like other functions.
113 Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though
114 they are not functions. @xref{Keyboard Macros}. We say that a symbol
115 is a command if its function cell contains a command (@pxref{Symbol
116 Components}); such a @dfn{named command} can be invoked with
120 A function object that is much like a lambda expression, except that
121 it also encloses an environment of lexical variable bindings.
124 @item byte-code function
125 A function that has been compiled by the byte compiler.
126 @xref{Byte-Code Type}.
128 @item autoload object
129 @cindex autoload object
130 A place-holder for a real function. If the autoload object is called,
131 Emacs loads the file containing the definition of the real function,
132 and then calls the real function. @xref{Autoload}.
135 You can use the function @code{functionp} to test if an object is a
138 @defun functionp object
139 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is any kind of
140 function, i.e., can be passed to @code{funcall}. Note that
141 @code{functionp} returns @code{t} for symbols that are function names,
142 and returns @code{nil} for special forms.
146 Unlike @code{functionp}, the next three functions do @emph{not} treat
147 a symbol as its function definition.
150 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function
151 (i.e., a Lisp primitive).
155 (subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,}
156 @result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.}
159 (subrp (symbol-function 'message))
165 @defun byte-code-function-p object
166 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a byte-code
167 function. For example:
171 (byte-code-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line))
177 @defun subr-arity subr
178 This function provides information about the argument list of a
179 primitive, @var{subr}. The returned value is a pair
180 @code{(@var{min} . @var{max})}. @var{min} is the minimum number of
181 args. @var{max} is the maximum number or the symbol @code{many}, for a
182 function with @code{&rest} arguments, or the symbol @code{unevalled} if
183 @var{subr} is a special form.
186 @node Lambda Expressions
187 @section Lambda Expressions
188 @cindex lambda expression
190 A lambda expression is a function object written in Lisp. Here is
195 "Return the hyperbolic cosine of X."
196 (* 0.5 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))
200 In Emacs Lisp, such a list is a valid expression which evaluates to
203 A lambda expression, by itself, has no name; it is an @dfn{anonymous
204 function}. Although lambda expressions can be used this way
205 (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), they are more commonly associated with
206 symbols to make @dfn{named functions} (@pxref{Function Names}).
207 Before going into these details, the following subsections describe
208 the components of a lambda expression and what they do.
211 * Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression.
212 * Simple Lambda:: A simple example.
213 * Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists.
214 * Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function.
217 @node Lambda Components
218 @subsection Components of a Lambda Expression
220 A lambda expression is a list that looks like this:
223 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
224 [@var{documentation-string}]
225 [@var{interactive-declaration}]
226 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
230 The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol
231 @code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The
232 reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that
233 other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as
236 The second element is a list of symbols---the argument variable names.
237 This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called,
238 the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda
239 list, which are given local bindings with the values provided.
240 @xref{Local Variables}.
242 The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the
243 function definition to describe the function for the Emacs help
244 facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}.
246 The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive
247 @var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the
248 function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called
249 @dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key.
250 Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive
251 declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive
254 @cindex body of function
255 The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp
256 code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say,
257 ``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the
258 function is the value returned by the last element of the body.
261 @subsection A Simple Lambda Expression Example
263 Consider the following example:
266 (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
270 We can call this function by passing it to @code{funcall}, like this:
274 (funcall (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
280 This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable
281 @code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3.
282 Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6;
283 therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6.
285 Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in
290 (funcall (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
296 This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5
297 4)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the
298 argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8.
300 As these examples show, you can use a form with a lambda expression
301 as its @sc{car} to make local variables and give them values. In the
302 old days of Lisp, this technique was the only way to bind and
303 initialize local variables. But nowadays, it is clearer to use the
304 special form @code{let} for this purpose (@pxref{Local Variables}).
305 Lambda expressions are mainly used as anonymous functions for passing
306 as arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), or
307 stored as symbol function definitions to produce named functions
308 (@pxref{Function Names}).
311 @subsection Other Features of Argument Lists
312 @kindex wrong-number-of-arguments
313 @cindex argument binding
314 @cindex binding arguments
315 @cindex argument lists, features
317 Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))},
318 specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three
319 arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four
320 arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error.
322 It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain
323 arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{substring}
324 accepts three arguments---a string, the start index and the end
325 index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the
326 string if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to
327 accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list}
330 @cindex optional arguments
331 @cindex rest arguments
334 To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function
335 is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional
336 arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the
337 keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument.
339 Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
343 (@var{required-vars}@dots{}
344 @r{[}&optional @var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]}
345 @r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]})
350 The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
351 clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
353 A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
354 @var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of
355 the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond
356 that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may
357 be any number of extra actual arguments.
359 If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted,
360 then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the
361 function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and
362 an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to
363 consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value.
364 This is what @code{substring} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to
365 @code{substring} means to use the length of the string supplied.
367 @cindex CL note---default optional arg
369 @b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what
370 default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp
371 always uses @code{nil}. Emacs Lisp does not support @code{supplied-p}
372 variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
375 For example, an argument list that looks like this:
378 (a b &optional c d &rest e)
382 binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are
383 required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and
384 @code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first
385 four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list. If
386 there are only two arguments, @code{c} is @code{nil}; if two or three
387 arguments, @code{d} is @code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e}
390 There is no way to have required arguments following optional
391 ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose
392 that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required.
393 Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the
394 third argument be for? Would it be used for the @var{c}, or for
395 @var{d}? One can argue for both possibilities. Similarly, it makes
396 no sense to have any more arguments (either required or optional)
397 after a @code{&rest} argument.
399 Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
402 (funcall (lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:}
403 1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.}
405 (funcall (lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:}
406 (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.}
409 (funcall (lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:}
410 (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.}
415 @node Function Documentation
416 @subsection Documentation Strings of Functions
417 @cindex documentation of function
419 A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string}
420 just after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of
421 the function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment
422 which actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the
423 Emacs help facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the
424 documentation string is accessed.
426 It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the
427 functions in your program, even those that are called only from within
428 your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they
429 are easier to access.
431 The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own,
432 because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist
433 of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose.
435 The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the
436 source file, but since these spaces come before the starting
437 double-quote, they are not part of the string. Some people make a
438 practice of indenting any additional lines of the string so that the
439 text lines up in the program source. @emph{That is a mistake.} The
440 indentation of the following lines is inside the string; what looks
441 nice in the source code will look ugly when displayed by the help
444 You may wonder how the documentation string could be optional, since
445 there are required components of the function that follow it (the body).
446 Since evaluation of a string returns that string, without any side effects,
447 it has no effect if it is not the last form in the body. Thus, in
448 practice, there is no confusion between the first form of the body and the
449 documentation string; if the only body form is a string then it serves both
450 as the return value and as the documentation.
452 The last line of the documentation string can specify calling
453 conventions different from the actual function arguments. Write
461 following a blank line, at the beginning of the line, with no newline
462 following it inside the documentation string. (The @samp{\} is used
463 to avoid confusing the Emacs motion commands.) The calling convention
464 specified in this way appears in help messages in place of the one
465 derived from the actual arguments of the function.
467 This feature is particularly useful for macro definitions, since the
468 arguments written in a macro definition often do not correspond to the
469 way users think of the parts of the macro call.
472 @section Naming a Function
473 @cindex function definition
474 @cindex named function
475 @cindex function name
477 A symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens when the
478 symbol's @dfn{function cell} (@pxref{Symbol Components}) contains a
479 function object (e.g., a lambda expression). Then the symbol itself
480 becomes a valid, callable function, equivalent to the function object
481 in its function cell.
483 The contents of the function cell are also called the symbol's
484 @dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a symbol's function
485 definition in place of the symbol is called @dfn{symbol function
486 indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}. If you have not given a
487 symbol a function definition, its function cell is said to be
488 @dfn{void}, and it cannot be used as a function.
490 In practice, nearly all functions have names, and are referred to by
491 their names. You can create a named Lisp function by defining a
492 lambda expression and putting it in a function cell (@pxref{Function
493 Cells}). However, it is more common to use the @code{defun} special
494 form, described in the next section.
496 @xref{Defining Functions}.
499 We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by
500 their names in Lisp expressions. Also, a named Lisp function can
501 easily refer to itself---it can be recursive. Furthermore, primitives
502 can only be referred to textually by their names, since primitive
503 function objects (@pxref{Primitive Function Type}) have no read
506 A function need not have a unique name. A given function object
507 @emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only one symbol, but
508 this is just a convention. It is easy to store it in several symbols
509 using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is a valid name for the
512 Note that a symbol used as a function name may also be used as a
513 variable; these two uses of a symbol are independent and do not
514 conflict. (This is not the case in some dialects of Lisp, like
517 @node Defining Functions
518 @section Defining Functions
519 @cindex defining a function
521 We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This
522 is called @dfn{defining a function}, and it is done with the
525 @defmac defun name args [doc] [declare] [interactive] body@dots{}
526 @code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It
527 defines the symbol @var{name} as a function with argument list
528 @var{args} and body forms given by @var{body}. Neither @var{name} nor
529 @var{args} should be quoted.
531 @var{doc}, if present, should be a string specifying the function's
532 documentation string (@pxref{Function Documentation}). @var{declare},
533 if present, should be a @code{declare} form specifying function
534 metadata (@pxref{Declare Form}). @var{interactive}, if present,
535 should be an @code{interactive} form specifying how the function is to
536 be called interactively (@pxref{Interactive Call}).
538 The return value of @code{defun} is undefined.
540 Here are some examples:
550 (defun bar (a &optional b &rest c)
553 @result{} (1 2 (3 4 5))
557 @result{} (1 nil nil)
561 @error{} Wrong number of arguments.
565 (defun capitalize-backwards ()
566 "Upcase the last letter of the word at point."
575 Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally.
576 @code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car}
577 without any hesitation or notification. Emacs does not prevent you
578 from doing this, because redefining a function is sometimes done
579 deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish deliberate
580 redefinition from unintentional redefinition.
583 @cindex function aliases
584 @cindex alias, for functions
585 @defun defalias name definition &optional doc
586 @anchor{Definition of defalias}
587 This function defines the symbol @var{name} as a function, with
588 definition @var{definition} (which can be any valid Lisp function).
589 Its return value is @emph{undefined}.
591 If @var{doc} is non-@code{nil}, it becomes the function documentation
592 of @var{name}. Otherwise, any documentation provided by
593 @var{definition} is used.
595 @cindex defalias-fset-function property
596 Internally, @code{defalias} normally uses @code{fset} to set the definition.
597 If @var{name} has a @code{defalias-fset-function} property, however,
598 the associated value is used as a function to call in place of @code{fset}.
600 The proper place to use @code{defalias} is where a specific function
601 name is being defined---especially where that name appears explicitly in
602 the source file being loaded. This is because @code{defalias} records
603 which file defined the function, just like @code{defun}
606 By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other
607 purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such
608 records. @xref{Function Cells}.
611 You cannot create a new primitive function with @code{defun} or
612 @code{defalias}, but you can use them to change the function definition of
613 any symbol, even one such as @code{car} or @code{x-popup-menu} whose
614 normal definition is a primitive. However, this is risky: for
615 instance, it is next to impossible to redefine @code{car} without
616 breaking Lisp completely. Redefining an obscure function such as
617 @code{x-popup-menu} is less dangerous, but it still may not work as
618 you expect. If there are calls to the primitive from C code, they
619 call the primitive's C definition directly, so changing the symbol's
620 definition will have no effect on them.
622 See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun}
623 and tells the Lisp compiler to perform inline expansion on it.
624 @xref{Inline Functions}.
626 @node Calling Functions
627 @section Calling Functions
628 @cindex function invocation
629 @cindex calling a function
631 Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do
632 anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a
633 function is also known as @dfn{invocation}.
635 The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list.
636 For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the
637 function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}.
638 @xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation.
640 When you write a list as an expression in your program, you specify
641 which function to call, and how many arguments to give it, in the text
642 of the program. Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you
643 need to compute at run time which function to call. To do that, use
644 the function @code{funcall}. When you also need to determine at run
645 time how many arguments to pass, use @code{apply}.
647 @defun funcall function &rest arguments
648 @code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns
649 whatever @var{function} returns.
651 Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including
652 @var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This
653 means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be
654 called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the
655 expressions you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values.
656 These values are @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of
657 calling @var{function}; the operation of @code{funcall} is like the
658 normal procedure for calling a function, once its arguments have
659 already been evaluated.
661 The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a
662 primitive function. Special forms and macros are not allowed, because
663 they make sense only when given the unevaluated argument
664 expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw
665 above, it never knows them in the first place.
677 (funcall f 'x 'y '(z))
682 @error{} Invalid function: #<subr and>
686 Compare these examples with the examples of @code{apply}.
689 @defun apply function &rest arguments
690 @code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like
691 @code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a
692 list of objects, which are passed to @var{function} as separate
693 arguments, rather than a single list. We say that @code{apply}
694 @dfn{spreads} this list so that each individual element becomes an
697 @code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with
698 @code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a
699 primitive function; special forms and macros do not make sense in
709 @error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z
712 (apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4))
716 (apply '+ '(1 2 3 4))
721 (apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil))
722 @result{} (a b c x y z)
726 For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see @ref{Definition
730 @cindex partial application of functions
732 Sometimes it is useful to fix some of the function's arguments at
733 certain values, and leave the rest of arguments for when the function
734 is actually called. The act of fixing some of the function's
735 arguments is called @dfn{partial application} of the function@footnote{
736 This is related to, but different from @dfn{currying}, which
737 transforms a function that takes multiple arguments in such a way that
738 it can be called as a chain of functions, each one with a single
740 The result is a new function that accepts the rest of
741 arguments and calls the original function with all the arguments
744 Here's how to do partial application in Emacs Lisp:
746 @defun apply-partially func &rest args
747 This function returns a new function which, when called, will call
748 @var{func} with the list of arguments composed from @var{args} and
749 additional arguments specified at the time of the call. If @var{func}
750 accepts @var{n} arguments, then a call to @code{apply-partially} with
751 @w{@code{@var{m} < @var{n}}} arguments will produce a new function of
752 @w{@code{@var{n} - @var{m}}} arguments.
754 Here's how we could define the built-in function @code{1+}, if it
755 didn't exist, using @code{apply-partially} and @code{+}, another
760 (defalias '1+ (apply-partially '+ 1)
761 "Increment argument by one.")
771 It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or
772 find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property
773 lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions
774 that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}.
776 Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op
777 function as the argument. Here are two different kinds of no-op
781 This function returns @var{arg} and has no side effects.
784 @defun ignore &rest args
785 This function ignores any arguments and returns @code{nil}.
788 Some functions are user-visible @dfn{commands}, which can be called
789 interactively (usually by a key sequence). It is possible to invoke
790 such a command exactly as though it was called interactively, by using
791 the @code{call-interactively} function. @xref{Interactive Call}.
793 @node Mapping Functions
794 @section Mapping Functions
795 @cindex mapping functions
797 A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function (@emph{not} a
798 special form or macro) to each element of a list or other collection.
799 Emacs Lisp has several such functions; this section describes
800 @code{mapcar}, @code{mapc}, and @code{mapconcat}, which map over a
801 list. @xref{Definition of mapatoms}, for the function @code{mapatoms}
802 which maps over the symbols in an obarray. @xref{Definition of
803 maphash}, for the function @code{maphash} which maps over key/value
804 associations in a hash table.
806 These mapping functions do not allow char-tables because a char-table
807 is a sparse array whose nominal range of indices is very large. To map
808 over a char-table in a way that deals properly with its sparse nature,
809 use the function @code{map-char-table} (@pxref{Char-Tables}).
811 @defun mapcar function sequence
812 @anchor{Definition of mapcar}
813 @code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence}
814 in turn, and returns a list of the results.
816 The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence except a
817 char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a string. The
818 result is always a list. The length of the result is the same as the
819 length of @var{sequence}. For example:
823 (mapcar 'car '((a b) (c d) (e f)))
827 (mapcar 'string "abc")
828 @result{} ("a" "b" "c")
832 ;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.}
833 (mapcar 'funcall my-hooks)
837 (defun mapcar* (function &rest args)
838 "Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS.
839 Return the list of results."
840 ;; @r{If no list is exhausted,}
841 (if (not (memq nil args))
842 ;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.}
843 (cons (apply function (mapcar 'car args))
844 (apply 'mapcar* function
845 ;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.}
846 (mapcar 'cdr args)))))
850 (mapcar* 'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4))
851 @result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3))
856 @defun mapc function sequence
857 @code{mapc} is like @code{mapcar} except that @var{function} is used for
858 side-effects only---the values it returns are ignored, not collected
859 into a list. @code{mapc} always returns @var{sequence}.
862 @defun mapconcat function sequence separator
863 @code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of
864 @var{sequence}: the results, which must be strings, are concatenated.
865 Between each pair of result strings, @code{mapconcat} inserts the string
866 @var{separator}. Usually @var{separator} contains a space or comma or
867 other suitable punctuation.
869 The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one
870 argument and return a string. The argument @var{sequence} can be any
871 kind of sequence except a char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a
872 bool-vector, or a string.
876 (mapconcat 'symbol-name
877 '(The cat in the hat)
879 @result{} "The cat in the hat"
883 (mapconcat (function (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x))))
891 @node Anonymous Functions
892 @section Anonymous Functions
893 @cindex anonymous function
895 Although functions are usually defined with @code{defun} and given
896 names at the same time, it is sometimes convenient to use an explicit
897 lambda expression---an @dfn{anonymous function}. Anonymous functions
898 are valid wherever function names are. They are often assigned as
899 variable values, or as arguments to functions; for instance, you might
900 pass one as the @var{function} argument to @code{mapcar}, which
901 applies that function to each element of a list (@pxref{Mapping
902 Functions}). @xref{describe-symbols example}, for a realistic example
905 When defining a lambda expression that is to be used as an anonymous
906 function, you can in principle use any method to construct the list.
907 But typically you should use the @code{lambda} macro, or the
908 @code{function} special form, or the @code{#'} read syntax:
910 @defmac lambda args [doc] [interactive] body@dots{}
911 This macro returns an anonymous function with argument list
912 @var{args}, documentation string @var{doc} (if any), interactive spec
913 @var{interactive} (if any), and body forms given by @var{body}.
915 In effect, this macro makes @code{lambda} forms self-quoting:
916 evaluating a form whose @sc{car} is @code{lambda} yields the form
921 @result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))
924 The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs
925 evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using
926 @code{function} as a subroutine (see below).
929 @defspec function function-object
930 @cindex function quoting
931 This special form returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it.
932 In this, it is similar to @code{quote} (@pxref{Quoting}). But unlike
933 @code{quote}, it also serves as a note to the Emacs evaluator and
934 byte-compiler that @var{function-object} is intended to be used as a
935 function. Assuming @var{function-object} is a valid lambda
936 expression, this has two effects:
940 When the code is byte-compiled, @var{function-object} is compiled into
941 a byte-code function object (@pxref{Byte Compilation}).
944 When lexical binding is enabled, @var{function-object} is converted
945 into a closure. @xref{Closures}.
949 @cindex @samp{#'} syntax
950 The read syntax @code{#'} is a short-hand for using @code{function}.
951 The following forms are all equivalent:
955 (function (lambda (x) (* x x)))
956 #'(lambda (x) (* x x))
959 In the following example, we define a @code{change-property}
960 function that takes a function as its third argument, followed by a
961 @code{double-property} function that makes use of
962 @code{change-property} by passing it an anonymous function:
966 (defun change-property (symbol prop function)
967 (let ((value (get symbol prop)))
968 (put symbol prop (funcall function value))))
972 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
973 (change-property symbol prop (lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
978 Note that we do not quote the @code{lambda} form.
980 If you compile the above code, the anonymous function is also
981 compiled. This would not happen if, say, you had constructed the
982 anonymous function by quoting it as a list:
984 @c Do not unquote this lambda!
987 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
988 (change-property symbol prop '(lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
993 In that case, the anonymous function is kept as a lambda expression in
994 the compiled code. The byte-compiler cannot assume this list is a
995 function, even though it looks like one, since it does not know that
996 @code{change-property} intends to use it as a function.
999 @section Accessing Function Cell Contents
1001 The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the
1002 function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test,
1003 and set the function cell of symbols.
1005 See also the function @code{indirect-function}. @xref{Definition of
1008 @defun symbol-function symbol
1009 @kindex void-function
1010 This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. It does
1011 not check that the returned object is a legitimate function.
1013 If the function cell is void, the return value is @code{nil}. To
1014 distinguish between a function cell that is void and one set to
1015 @code{nil}, use @code{fboundp} (see below).
1019 (defun bar (n) (+ n 2))
1020 (symbol-function 'bar)
1021 @result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2))
1028 (symbol-function 'baz)
1034 @cindex void function cell
1035 If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say
1036 that that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the
1037 function cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call
1038 the symbol as a function, Emacs signals a @code{void-function} error.
1040 Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol
1041 @code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects,
1042 and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be
1043 (and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with
1044 @code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever.
1046 You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with
1047 @code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you
1048 can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}.
1050 @defun fboundp symbol
1051 This function returns @code{t} if the symbol has an object in its
1052 function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object
1053 is a legitimate function.
1056 @defun fmakunbound symbol
1057 This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a
1058 subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a
1059 @code{void-function} error. It returns @var{symbol}. (See also
1060 @code{makunbound}, in @ref{Void Variables}.)
1074 @error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo
1079 @defun fset symbol definition
1080 This function stores @var{definition} in the function cell of
1081 @var{symbol}. The result is @var{definition}. Normally
1082 @var{definition} should be a function or the name of a function, but
1083 this is not checked. The argument @var{symbol} is an ordinary evaluated
1086 The primary use of this function is as a subroutine by constructs that define
1087 or alter functions, like @code{defun} or @code{advice-add} (@pxref{Advising
1088 Functions}). You can also use it to give a symbol a function definition that
1089 is not a function, e.g., a keyboard macro (@pxref{Keyboard Macros}):
1092 ;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.}
1093 (fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k")
1097 It you wish to use @code{fset} to make an alternate name for a
1098 function, consider using @code{defalias} instead. @xref{Definition of
1105 As explained in @ref{Variable Scoping}, Emacs can optionally enable
1106 lexical binding of variables. When lexical binding is enabled, any
1107 named function that you create (e.g., with @code{defun}), as well as
1108 any anonymous function that you create using the @code{lambda} macro
1109 or the @code{function} special form or the @code{#'} syntax
1110 (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), is automatically converted into a
1114 A closure is a function that also carries a record of the lexical
1115 environment that existed when the function was defined. When it is
1116 invoked, any lexical variable references within its definition use the
1117 retained lexical environment. In all other respects, closures behave
1118 much like ordinary functions; in particular, they can be called in the
1119 same way as ordinary functions.
1121 @xref{Lexical Binding}, for an example of using a closure.
1123 Currently, an Emacs Lisp closure object is represented by a list
1124 with the symbol @code{closure} as the first element, a list
1125 representing the lexical environment as the second element, and the
1126 argument list and body forms as the remaining elements:
1129 ;; @r{lexical binding is enabled.}
1130 (lambda (x) (* x x))
1131 @result{} (closure (t) (x) (* x x))
1135 However, the fact that the internal structure of a closure is
1136 exposed to the rest of the Lisp world is considered an internal
1137 implementation detail. For this reason, we recommend against directly
1138 examining or altering the structure of closure objects.
1140 @node Advising Functions
1141 @section Advising Emacs Lisp Functions
1142 @cindex advising functions
1143 @cindex piece of advice
1145 When you need to modify a function defined in another library, or when you need
1146 to modify a hook like @code{@var{foo}-function}, a process filter, or basically
1147 any variable or object field which holds a function value, you can use the
1148 appropriate setter function, such as @code{fset} or @code{defun} for named
1149 functions, @code{setq} for hook variables, or @code{set-process-filter} for
1150 process filters, but those are often too blunt, completely throwing away the
1153 The @dfn{advice} feature lets you add to the existing definition of
1154 a function, by @dfn{advising the function}. This is a cleaner method
1155 than redefining the whole function.
1157 Emacs's advice system provides two sets of primitives for that: the core set,
1158 for function values held in variables and object fields (with the corresponding
1159 primitives being @code{add-function} and @code{remove-function}) and another
1160 set layered on top of it for named functions (with the main primitives being
1161 @code{advice-add} and @code{advice-remove}).
1163 For example, in order to trace the calls to the process filter of a process
1164 @var{proc}, you could use:
1167 (defun my-tracing-function (proc string)
1168 (message "Proc %S received %S" proc string))
1170 (add-function :before (process-filter @var{proc}) #'my-tracing-function)
1173 This will cause the process's output to be passed to @code{my-tracing-function}
1174 before being passed to the original process filter. @code{my-tracing-function}
1175 receives the same arguments as the original function. When you're done with
1176 it, you can revert to the untraced behavior with:
1179 (remove-function (process-filter @var{proc}) #'my-tracing-function)
1182 Similarly, if you want to trace the execution of the function named
1183 @code{display-buffer}, you could use:
1186 (defun his-tracing-function (orig-fun &rest args)
1187 (message "display-buffer called with args %S" args)
1188 (let ((res (apply orig-fun args)))
1189 (message "display-buffer returned %S" res)
1192 (advice-add 'display-buffer :around #'his-tracing-function)
1195 Here, @code{his-tracing-function} is called instead of the original function
1196 and receives the original function (additionally to that function's arguments)
1197 as argument, so it can call it if and when it needs to.
1198 When you're tired of seeing this output, you can revert to the untraced
1202 (advice-remove 'display-buffer #'his-tracing-function)
1205 The arguments @code{:before} and @code{:around} used in the above examples
1206 specify how the two functions are composed, since there are many different
1207 ways to do it. The added function is also called a piece of @emph{advice}.
1210 * Core Advising Primitives:: Primitives to manipulate advice.
1211 * Advising Named Functions:: Advising named functions.
1212 * Advice combinators:: Ways to compose advice.
1213 * Porting old advice:: Adapting code using the old defadvice.
1216 @node Core Advising Primitives
1217 @subsection Primitives to manipulate advices
1218 @cindex advice, add and remove
1220 @defmac add-function where place function &optional props
1221 This macro is the handy way to add the advice @var{function} to the function
1222 stored in @var{place} (@pxref{Generalized Variables}).
1224 @var{where} determines how @var{function} is composed with the
1225 existing function, e.g., whether @var{function} should be called before, or
1226 after the original function. @xref{Advice combinators}, for the list of
1227 available ways to compose the two functions.
1229 When modifying a variable (whose name will usually end with @code{-function}),
1230 you can choose whether @var{function} is used globally or only in the current
1231 buffer: if @var{place} is just a symbol, then @var{function} is added to the
1232 global value of @var{place}. Whereas if @var{place} is of the form
1233 @code{(local @var{symbol})}, where @var{symbol} is an expression which returns
1234 the variable name, then @var{function} will only be added in the
1235 current buffer. Finally, if you want to modify a lexical variable, you will
1236 have to use @code{(var @var{variable})}.
1238 Every function added with @code{add-function} can be accompanied by an
1239 association list of properties @var{props}. Currently only two of those
1240 properties have a special meaning:
1244 This gives a name to the advice, which @code{remove-function} can use to
1245 identify which function to remove. Typically used when @var{function} is an
1249 This specifies how to order the advice, should several pieces of
1250 advice be present. By default, the depth is 0. A depth of 100
1251 indicates that this piece of advice should be kept as deep as
1252 possible, whereas a depth of -100 indicates that it should stay as the
1253 outermost piece. When two pieces of advice specify the same depth,
1254 the most recently added one will be outermost.
1256 For @code{:before} advice, being outermost means that this advice will
1257 be run first, before any other advice, whereas being innermost means
1258 that it will run right before the original function, with no other
1259 advice run between itself and the original function. Similarly, for
1260 @code{:after} advice innermost means that it will run right after the
1261 original function, with no other advice run in between, whereas
1262 outermost means that it will be run right at the end after all other
1263 advice. An innermost @code{:override} piece of advice will only
1264 override the original function and other pieces of advice will apply
1265 to it, whereas an outermost @code{:override} piece of advice will
1266 override not only the original function but all other advice applied
1270 If @var{function} is not interactive, then the combined function will inherit
1271 the interactive spec, if any, of the original function. Else, the combined
1272 function will be interactive and will use the interactive spec of
1273 @var{function}. One exception: if the interactive spec of @var{function}
1274 is a function (rather than an expression or a string), then the interactive
1275 spec of the combined function will be a call to that function with as sole
1276 argument the interactive spec of the original function. To interpret the spec
1277 received as argument, use @code{advice-eval-interactive-spec}.
1279 Note: The interactive spec of @var{function} will apply to the combined
1280 function and should hence obey the calling convention of the combined function
1281 rather than that of @var{function}. In many cases, it makes no difference
1282 since they are identical, but it does matter for @code{:around},
1283 @code{:filter-args}, and @code{filter-return}, where @var{function}.
1286 @defmac remove-function place function
1287 This macro removes @var{function} from the function stored in
1288 @var{place}. This only works if @var{function} was added to @var{place}
1289 using @code{add-function}.
1291 @var{function} is compared with functions added to @var{place} using
1292 @code{equal}, to try and make it work also with lambda expressions. It is
1293 additionally compared also with the @code{name} property of the functions added
1294 to @var{place}, which can be more reliable than comparing lambda expressions
1298 @defun advice-function-member-p advice function-def
1299 Return non-@code{nil} if @var{advice} is already in @var{function-def}.
1300 Like for @code{remove-function} above, instead of @var{advice} being the actual
1301 function, it can also be the @code{name} of the piece of advice.
1304 @defun advice-function-mapc f function-def
1305 Call the function @var{f} for every piece of advice that was added to
1306 @var{function-def}. @var{f} is called with two arguments: the advice function
1310 @defun advice-eval-interactive-spec spec
1311 Evaluate the interactive @var{spec} just like an interactive call to a function
1312 with such a spec would, and then return the corresponding list of arguments
1313 that was built. E.g., @code{(advice-eval-interactive-spec "r\nP")} will
1314 return a list of three elements, containing the boundaries of the region and
1315 the current prefix argument.
1318 @node Advising Named Functions
1319 @subsection Advising Named Functions
1320 @cindex advising named functions
1322 A common use of advice is for named functions and macros.
1323 You could just use @code{add-function} as in:
1326 (add-function :around (symbol-function '@var{fun}) #'his-tracing-function)
1329 But you should use @code{advice-add} and @code{advice-remove} for that
1330 instead. This separate set of functions to manipulate pieces of advice applied
1331 to named functions, offers the following extra features compared to
1332 @code{add-function}: they know how to deal with macros and autoloaded
1333 functions, they let @code{describe-function} preserve the original docstring as
1334 well as document the added advice, and they let you add and remove advice
1335 before a function is even defined.
1337 @code{advice-add} can be useful for altering the behavior of existing calls
1338 to an existing function without having to redefine the whole function.
1339 However, it can be a source of bugs, since existing callers to the function may
1340 assume the old behavior, and work incorrectly when the behavior is changed by
1341 advice. Advice can also cause confusion in debugging, if the person doing the
1342 debugging does not notice or remember that the function has been modified
1345 For these reasons, advice should be reserved for the cases where you
1346 cannot modify a function's behavior in any other way. If it is
1347 possible to do the same thing via a hook, that is preferable
1348 (@pxref{Hooks}). If you simply want to change what a particular key
1349 does, it may be better to write a new command, and remap the old
1350 command's key bindings to the new one (@pxref{Remapping Commands}).
1351 In particular, Emacs's own source files should not put advice on
1352 functions in Emacs. (There are currently a few exceptions to this
1353 convention, but we aim to correct them.)
1355 Special forms (@pxref{Special Forms}) cannot be advised, however macros can
1356 be advised, in much the same way as functions. Of course, this will not affect
1357 code that has already been macro-expanded, so you need to make sure the advice
1358 is installed before the macro is expanded.
1360 It is possible to advise a primitive (@pxref{What Is a Function}),
1361 but one should typically @emph{not} do so, for two reasons. Firstly,
1362 some primitives are used by the advice mechanism, and advising them
1363 could cause an infinite recursion. Secondly, many primitives are
1364 called directly from C, and such calls ignore advice; hence, one ends
1365 up in a confusing situation where some calls (occurring from Lisp
1366 code) obey the advice and other calls (from C code) do not.
1368 @defmac define-advice symbol (where lambda-list &optional name depth) &rest body
1369 This macro defines a piece of advice and adds it to the function named
1370 @var{symbol}. The advice is an anonymous function if @var{name} is
1371 nil or a function named @code{symbol@@name}. See @code{advice-add}
1372 for explanation of other arguments.
1375 @defun advice-add symbol where function &optional props
1376 Add the advice @var{function} to the named function @var{symbol}.
1377 @var{where} and @var{props} have the same meaning as for @code{add-function}
1378 (@pxref{Core Advising Primitives}).
1381 @defun advice-remove symbol function
1382 Remove the advice @var{function} from the named function @var{symbol}.
1383 @var{function} can also be the @code{name} of a piece of advice.
1386 @defun advice-member-p function symbol
1387 Return non-@code{nil} if the advice @var{function} is already in the named
1388 function @var{symbol}. @var{function} can also be the @code{name} of
1392 @defun advice-mapc function symbol
1393 Call @var{function} for every piece of advice that was added to the
1394 named function @var{symbol}. @var{function} is called with two
1395 arguments: the advice function and its properties.
1398 @node Advice combinators
1399 @subsection Ways to compose advice
1401 Here are the different possible values for the @var{where} argument of
1402 @code{add-function} and @code{advice-add}, specifying how the advice
1403 @var{function} and the original function should be composed.
1407 Call @var{function} before the old function. Both functions receive the
1408 same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
1409 the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
1412 (lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r))
1414 @code{(add-function :before @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable for
1415 single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})} for
1419 Call @var{function} after the old function. Both functions receive the
1420 same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
1421 the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
1424 (lambda (&rest r) (prog1 (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
1426 @code{(add-function :after @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable for
1427 single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
1428 'append)} for normal hooks.
1431 This completely replaces the old function with the new one. The old function
1432 can of course be recovered if you later call @code{remove-function}.
1435 Call @var{function} instead of the old function, but provide the old function
1436 as an extra argument to @var{function}. This is the most flexible composition.
1437 For example, it lets you call the old function with different arguments, or
1438 many times, or within a let-binding, or you can sometimes delegate the work to
1439 the old function and sometimes override it completely. More specifically, the
1440 composition of the two functions behaves like:
1442 (lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{function} @var{oldfun} r))
1446 Call @var{function} before the old function and don't call the old
1447 function if @var{function} returns @code{nil}. Both functions receive the
1448 same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
1449 the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
1452 (lambda (&rest r) (and (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
1454 @code{(add-function :before-while @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
1455 for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})}
1456 when @var{hookvar} is run via @code{run-hook-with-args-until-failure}.
1459 Call @var{function} before the old function and only call the old function if
1460 @var{function} returns @code{nil}. More specifically, the composition of the
1461 two functions behaves like:
1463 (lambda (&rest r) (or (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
1465 @code{(add-function :before-until @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
1466 for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})}
1467 when @var{hookvar} is run via @code{run-hook-with-args-until-success}.
1470 Call @var{function} after the old function and only if the old function
1471 returned non-@code{nil}. Both functions receive the same arguments, and the
1472 return value of the composition is the return value of @var{function}.
1473 More specifically, the composition of the two functions behaves like:
1475 (lambda (&rest r) (and (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
1477 @code{(add-function :after-while @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
1478 for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
1479 'append)} when @var{hookvar} is run via
1480 @code{run-hook-with-args-until-failure}.
1483 Call @var{function} after the old function and only if the old function
1484 returned @code{nil}. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
1487 (lambda (&rest r) (or (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
1489 @code{(add-function :after-until @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
1490 for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
1491 'append)} when @var{hookvar} is run via
1492 @code{run-hook-with-args-until-success}.
1495 Call @var{function} first and use the result (which should be a list) as the
1496 new arguments to pass to the old function. More specifically, the composition
1497 of the two functions behaves like:
1499 (lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{oldfun} (funcall @var{function} r)))
1502 @item :filter-return
1503 Call the old function first and pass the result to @var{function}.
1504 More specifically, the composition of the two functions behaves like:
1506 (lambda (&rest r) (funcall @var{function} (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
1511 @node Porting old advice
1512 @subsection Adapting code using the old defadvice
1513 @cindex old advices, porting
1515 A lot of code uses the old @code{defadvice} mechanism, which is largely made
1516 obsolete by the new @code{advice-add}, whose implementation and semantics is
1517 significantly simpler.
1519 An old piece of advice such as:
1522 (defadvice previous-line (before next-line-at-end
1523 (&optional arg try-vscroll))
1524 "Insert an empty line when moving up from the top line."
1525 (if (and next-line-add-newlines (= arg 1)
1526 (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (bobp)))
1532 could be translated in the new advice mechanism into a plain function:
1535 (defun previous-line--next-line-at-end (&optional arg try-vscroll)
1536 "Insert an empty line when moving up from the top line."
1537 (if (and next-line-add-newlines (= arg 1)
1538 (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (bobp)))
1544 Obviously, this does not actually modify @code{previous-line}. For that the
1547 (ad-activate 'previous-line)
1549 whereas the new advice mechanism needs:
1551 (advice-add 'previous-line :before #'previous-line--next-line-at-end)
1554 Note that @code{ad-activate} had a global effect: it activated all pieces of
1555 advice enabled for that specified function. If you wanted to only activate or
1556 deactivate a particular piece, you needed to @emph{enable} or @emph{disable}
1557 it with @code{ad-enable-advice} and @code{ad-disable-advice}.
1558 The new mechanism does away with this distinction.
1560 Around advice such as:
1563 (defadvice foo (around foo-around)
1564 "Ignore case in `foo'."
1565 (let ((case-fold-search t))
1570 could translate into:
1573 (defun foo--foo-around (orig-fun &rest args)
1574 "Ignore case in `foo'."
1575 (let ((case-fold-search t))
1576 (apply orig-fun args)))
1577 (advice-add 'foo :around #'foo--foo-around)
1580 Regarding the advice's @emph{class}, note that the new @code{:before} is not
1581 quite equivalent to the old @code{before}, because in the old advice you could
1582 modify the function's arguments (e.g., with @code{ad-set-arg}), and that would
1583 affect the argument values seen by the original function, whereas in the new
1584 @code{:before}, modifying an argument via @code{setq} in the advice has no
1585 effect on the arguments seen by the original function.
1586 When porting @code{before} advice which relied on this behavior, you'll need
1587 to turn it into new @code{:around} or @code{:filter-args} advice instead.
1589 Similarly old @code{after} advice could modify the returned value by
1590 changing @code{ad-return-value}, whereas new @code{:after} advice cannot, so
1591 when porting such old @code{after} advice, you'll need to turn it into new
1592 @code{:around} or @code{:filter-return} advice instead.
1594 @node Obsolete Functions
1595 @section Declaring Functions Obsolete
1596 @cindex obsolete functions
1598 You can mark a named function as @dfn{obsolete}, meaning that it may
1599 be removed at some point in the future. This causes Emacs to warn
1600 that the function is obsolete whenever it byte-compiles code
1601 containing that function, and whenever it displays the documentation
1602 for that function. In all other respects, an obsolete function
1603 behaves like any other function.
1605 The easiest way to mark a function as obsolete is to put a
1606 @code{(declare (obsolete @dots{}))} form in the function's
1607 @code{defun} definition. @xref{Declare Form}. Alternatively, you can
1608 use the @code{make-obsolete} function, described below.
1610 A macro (@pxref{Macros}) can also be marked obsolete with
1611 @code{make-obsolete}; this has the same effects as for a function. An
1612 alias for a function or macro can also be marked as obsolete; this
1613 makes the alias itself obsolete, not the function or macro which it
1616 @defun make-obsolete obsolete-name current-name &optional when
1617 This function marks @var{obsolete-name} as obsolete.
1618 @var{obsolete-name} should be a symbol naming a function or macro, or
1619 an alias for a function or macro.
1621 If @var{current-name} is a symbol, the warning message says to use
1622 @var{current-name} instead of @var{obsolete-name}. @var{current-name}
1623 does not need to be an alias for @var{obsolete-name}; it can be a
1624 different function with similar functionality. @var{current-name} can
1625 also be a string, which serves as the warning message. The message
1626 should begin in lower case, and end with a period. It can also be
1627 @code{nil}, in which case the warning message provides no additional
1630 If provided, @var{when} should be a string indicating when the function
1631 was first made obsolete---for example, a date or a release number.
1634 @defmac define-obsolete-function-alias obsolete-name current-name &optional when doc
1635 This convenience macro marks the function @var{obsolete-name} obsolete
1636 and also defines it as an alias for the function @var{current-name}.
1637 It is equivalent to the following:
1640 (defalias @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{doc})
1641 (make-obsolete @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{when})
1645 In addition, you can mark a certain a particular calling convention
1646 for a function as obsolete:
1648 @defun set-advertised-calling-convention function signature when
1649 This function specifies the argument list @var{signature} as the
1650 correct way to call @var{function}. This causes the Emacs byte
1651 compiler to issue a warning whenever it comes across an Emacs Lisp
1652 program that calls @var{function} any other way (however, it will
1653 still allow the code to be byte compiled). @var{when} should be a
1654 string indicating when the variable was first made obsolete (usually a
1655 version number string).
1657 For instance, in old versions of Emacs the @code{sit-for} function
1658 accepted three arguments, like this
1661 (sit-for seconds milliseconds nodisp)
1664 However, calling @code{sit-for} this way is considered obsolete
1665 (@pxref{Waiting}). The old calling convention is deprecated like
1669 (set-advertised-calling-convention
1670 'sit-for '(seconds &optional nodisp) "22.1")
1674 @node Inline Functions
1675 @section Inline Functions
1676 @cindex inline functions
1678 An @dfn{inline function} is a function that works just like an
1679 ordinary function, except for one thing: when you byte-compile a call
1680 to the function (@pxref{Byte Compilation}), the function's definition
1681 is expanded into the caller. To define an inline function, use
1682 @code{defsubst} instead of @code{defun}.
1684 @defmac defsubst name args [doc] [declare] [interactive] body@dots{}
1685 This macro defines an inline function. Its syntax is exactly the same
1686 as @code{defun} (@pxref{Defining Functions}).
1689 Making a function inline often makes its function calls run faster.
1690 But it also has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility;
1691 if you change the definition of the function, calls already inlined
1692 still use the old definition until you recompile them.
1694 Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can
1695 increase the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since
1696 the speed advantage of inline functions is greatest for small
1697 functions, you generally should not make large functions inline.
1699 Also, inline functions do not behave well with respect to debugging,
1700 tracing, and advising (@pxref{Advising Functions}). Since ease of
1701 debugging and the flexibility of redefining functions are important
1702 features of Emacs, you should not make a function inline, even if it's
1703 small, unless its speed is really crucial, and you've timed the code
1704 to verify that using @code{defun} actually has performance problems.
1706 It's possible to define a macro to expand into the same code that an
1707 inline function would execute (@pxref{Macros}). But the macro would
1708 be limited to direct use in expressions---a macro cannot be called
1709 with @code{apply}, @code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work
1710 to convert an ordinary function into a macro. To convert it into an
1711 inline function is easy; just replace @code{defun} with
1712 @code{defsubst}. Since each argument of an inline function is
1713 evaluated exactly once, you needn't worry about how many times the
1714 body uses the arguments, as you do for macros.
1716 After an inline function is defined, its inline expansion can be
1717 performed later on in the same file, just like macros.
1720 @section The @code{declare} Form
1723 @code{declare} is a special macro which can be used to add meta
1724 properties to a function or macro: for example, marking it as
1725 obsolete, or giving its forms a special @key{TAB} indentation
1726 convention in Emacs Lisp mode.
1728 @anchor{Definition of declare}
1729 @defmac declare specs@dots{}
1730 This macro ignores its arguments and evaluates to @code{nil}; it has
1731 no run-time effect. However, when a @code{declare} form occurs in the
1732 @var{declare} argument of a @code{defun} or @code{defsubst} function
1733 definition (@pxref{Defining Functions}) or a @code{defmacro} macro
1734 definition (@pxref{Defining Macros}), it appends the properties
1735 specified by @var{specs} to the function or macro. This work is
1736 specially performed by @code{defun}, @code{defsubst}, and
1739 Each element in @var{specs} should have the form @code{(@var{property}
1740 @var{args}@dots{})}, which should not be quoted. These have the
1744 @item (advertised-calling-convention @var{signature} @var{when})
1745 This acts like a call to @code{set-advertised-calling-convention}
1746 (@pxref{Obsolete Functions}); @var{signature} specifies the correct
1747 argument list for calling the function or macro, and @var{when} should
1748 be a string indicating when the old argument list was first made obsolete.
1750 @item (debug @var{edebug-form-spec})
1751 This is valid for macros only. When stepping through the macro with
1752 Edebug, use @var{edebug-form-spec}. @xref{Instrumenting Macro Calls}.
1754 @item (doc-string @var{n})
1755 This is used when defining a function or macro which itself will be used to
1756 define entities like functions, macros, or variables. It indicates that
1757 the @var{n}th argument, if any, should be considered
1758 as a documentation string.
1760 @item (indent @var{indent-spec})
1761 Indent calls to this function or macro according to @var{indent-spec}.
1762 This is typically used for macros, though it works for functions too.
1763 @xref{Indenting Macros}.
1765 @item (interactive-only @var{value})
1766 Set the function's @code{interactive-only} property to @var{value}.
1767 @xref{The interactive-only property}.
1769 @item (obsolete @var{current-name} @var{when})
1770 Mark the function or macro as obsolete, similar to a call to
1771 @code{make-obsolete} (@pxref{Obsolete Functions}). @var{current-name}
1772 should be a symbol (in which case the warning message says to use that
1773 instead), a string (specifying the warning message), or @code{nil} (in
1774 which case the warning message gives no extra details). @var{when}
1775 should be a string indicating when the function or macro was first
1778 @item (compiler-macro @var{expander})
1779 This can only be used for functions, and tells the compiler to use
1780 @var{expander} as an optimization function. When encountering a call to the
1781 function, of the form @code{(@var{function} @var{args}@dots{})}, the macro
1782 expander will call @var{expander} with that form as well as with
1783 @var{args}@dots{}, and @var{expander} can either return a new expression to use
1784 instead of the function call, or it can return just the form unchanged,
1785 to indicate that the function call should be left alone. @var{expander} can
1786 be a symbol, or it can be a form @code{(lambda (@var{arg}) @var{body})} in
1787 which case @var{arg} will hold the original function call expression, and the
1788 (unevaluated) arguments to the function can be accessed using the function's
1791 @item (gv-expander @var{expander})
1792 Declare @var{expander} to be the function to handle calls to the macro (or
1793 function) as a generalized variable, similarly to @code{gv-define-expander}.
1794 @var{expander} can be a symbol or it can be of the form @code{(lambda
1795 (@var{arg}) @var{body})} in which case that function will additionally have
1796 access to the macro (or function)'s arguments.
1798 @item (gv-setter @var{setter})
1799 Declare @var{setter} to be the function to handle calls to the macro (or
1800 function) as a generalized variable. @var{setter} can be a symbol in which
1801 case it will be passed to @code{gv-define-simple-setter}, or it can be of the
1802 form @code{(lambda (@var{arg}) @var{body})} in which case that function will
1803 additionally have access to the macro (or function)'s arguments and it will
1804 passed to @code{gv-define-setter}.
1810 @node Declaring Functions
1811 @section Telling the Compiler that a Function is Defined
1812 @cindex function declaration
1813 @cindex declaring functions
1814 @findex declare-function
1816 Byte-compiling a file often produces warnings about functions that the
1817 compiler doesn't know about (@pxref{Compiler Errors}). Sometimes this
1818 indicates a real problem, but usually the functions in question are
1819 defined in other files which would be loaded if that code is run. For
1820 example, byte-compiling @file{fortran.el} used to warn:
1824 fortran.el:2152:1:Warning: the function ‘gud-find-c-expr’ is not
1825 known to be defined.
1828 In fact, @code{gud-find-c-expr} is only used in the function that
1829 Fortran mode uses for the local value of
1830 @code{gud-find-expr-function}, which is a callback from GUD; if it is
1831 called, the GUD functions will be loaded. When you know that such a
1832 warning does not indicate a real problem, it is good to suppress the
1833 warning. That makes new warnings which might mean real problems more
1834 visible. You do that with @code{declare-function}.
1836 All you need to do is add a @code{declare-function} statement before the
1837 first use of the function in question:
1840 (declare-function gud-find-c-expr "gud.el" nil)
1843 This says that @code{gud-find-c-expr} is defined in @file{gud.el} (the
1844 @samp{.el} can be omitted). The compiler takes for granted that that file
1845 really defines the function, and does not check.
1847 The optional third argument specifies the argument list of
1848 @code{gud-find-c-expr}. In this case, it takes no arguments
1849 (@code{nil} is different from not specifying a value). In other
1850 cases, this might be something like @code{(file &optional overwrite)}.
1851 You don't have to specify the argument list, but if you do the
1852 byte compiler can check that the calls match the declaration.
1854 @defmac declare-function function file &optional arglist fileonly
1855 Tell the byte compiler to assume that @var{function} is defined, with
1856 arguments @var{arglist}, and that the definition should come from the
1857 file @var{file}. @var{fileonly} non-@code{nil} means only check that
1858 @var{file} exists, not that it actually defines @var{function}.
1861 To verify that these functions really are declared where
1862 @code{declare-function} says they are, use @code{check-declare-file}
1863 to check all @code{declare-function} calls in one source file, or use
1864 @code{check-declare-directory} check all the files in and under a
1867 These commands find the file that ought to contain a function's
1868 definition using @code{locate-library}; if that finds no file, they
1869 expand the definition file name relative to the directory of the file
1870 that contains the @code{declare-function} call.
1872 You can also say that a function is a primitive by specifying a file
1873 name ending in @samp{.c} or @samp{.m}. This is useful only when you
1874 call a primitive that is defined only on certain systems. Most
1875 primitives are always defined, so they will never give you a warning.
1877 Sometimes a file will optionally use functions from an external package.
1878 If you prefix the filename in the @code{declare-function} statement with
1879 @samp{ext:}, then it will be checked if it is found, otherwise skipped
1882 There are some function definitions that @samp{check-declare} does not
1883 understand (e.g., @code{defstruct} and some other macros). In such cases,
1884 you can pass a non-@code{nil} @var{fileonly} argument to
1885 @code{declare-function}, meaning to only check that the file exists, not
1886 that it actually defines the function. Note that to do this without
1887 having to specify an argument list, you should set the @var{arglist}
1888 argument to @code{t} (because @code{nil} means an empty argument list, as
1889 opposed to an unspecified one).
1891 @node Function Safety
1892 @section Determining whether a Function is Safe to Call
1893 @cindex function safety
1894 @cindex safety of functions
1896 Some major modes, such as SES, call functions that are stored in user
1897 files. (@inforef{Top, ,ses}, for more information on SES@.) User
1898 files sometimes have poor pedigrees---you can get a spreadsheet from
1899 someone you've just met, or you can get one through email from someone
1900 you've never met. So it is risky to call a function whose source code
1901 is stored in a user file until you have determined that it is safe.
1903 @defun unsafep form &optional unsafep-vars
1904 Returns @code{nil} if @var{form} is a @dfn{safe} Lisp expression, or
1905 returns a list that describes why it might be unsafe. The argument
1906 @var{unsafep-vars} is a list of symbols known to have temporary
1907 bindings at this point; it is mainly used for internal recursive
1908 calls. The current buffer is an implicit argument, which provides a
1909 list of buffer-local bindings.
1912 Being quick and simple, @code{unsafep} does a very light analysis and
1913 rejects many Lisp expressions that are actually safe. There are no
1914 known cases where @code{unsafep} returns @code{nil} for an unsafe
1915 expression. However, a safe Lisp expression can return a string
1916 with a @code{display} property, containing an associated Lisp
1917 expression to be executed after the string is inserted into a buffer.
1918 This associated expression can be a virus. In order to be safe, you
1919 must delete properties from all strings calculated by user code before
1920 inserting them into buffers.
1923 What is a safe Lisp expression? Basically, it's an expression that
1924 calls only built-in functions with no side effects (or only innocuous
1925 ones). Innocuous side effects include displaying messages and
1926 altering non-risky buffer-local variables (but not global variables).
1929 @item Safe expression
1932 An atom or quoted thing.
1934 A call to a safe function (see below), if all its arguments are
1937 One of the special forms @code{and}, @code{catch}, @code{cond},
1938 @code{if}, @code{or}, @code{prog1}, @code{prog2}, @code{progn},
1939 @code{while}, and @code{unwind-protect}], if all its arguments are
1942 A form that creates temporary bindings (@code{condition-case},
1943 @code{dolist}, @code{dotimes}, @code{lambda}, @code{let}, or
1944 @code{let*}), if all args are safe and the symbols to be bound are not
1945 explicitly risky (see @pxref{File Local Variables}).
1947 An assignment using @code{add-to-list}, @code{setq}, @code{push}, or
1948 @code{pop}, if all args are safe and the symbols to be assigned are
1949 not explicitly risky and they already have temporary or buffer-local
1952 One of [apply, mapc, mapcar, mapconcat] if the first argument is a
1953 safe explicit lambda and the other args are safe expressions.
1959 A lambda containing safe expressions.
1961 A symbol on the list @code{safe-functions}, so the user says it's safe.
1963 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{side-effect-free} property.
1965 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{safe-function} property. The
1966 value @code{t} indicates a function that is safe but has innocuous
1967 side effects. Other values will someday indicate functions with
1968 classes of side effects that are not always safe.
1971 The @code{side-effect-free} and @code{safe-function} properties are
1972 provided for built-in functions and for low-level functions and macros
1973 defined in @file{subr.el}. You can assign these properties for the
1974 functions you write.
1978 @node Related Topics
1979 @section Other Topics Related to Functions
1981 Here is a table of several functions that do things related to
1982 function calling and function definitions. They are documented
1983 elsewhere, but we provide cross references here.
1987 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1992 @item call-interactively
1993 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1995 @item called-interactively-p
1996 See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
1999 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
2002 See @ref{Accessing Documentation}.
2008 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
2011 See @ref{Anonymous Functions}.
2014 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
2016 @item indirect-function
2017 See @ref{Function Indirection}.
2020 See @ref{Using Interactive}.
2023 See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
2026 See @ref{Creating Symbols}.
2029 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
2031 @item map-char-table
2032 See @ref{Char-Tables}.
2035 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
2038 See @ref{Functions for Key Lookup}.