2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990-1994, 1998, 2001-2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
5 @setfilename ../../info/eval
6 @node Evaluation, Control Structures, Symbols, Top
11 @cindex value of expression
13 The @dfn{evaluation} of expressions in Emacs Lisp is performed by the
14 @dfn{Lisp interpreter}---a program that receives a Lisp object as input
15 and computes its @dfn{value as an expression}. How it does this depends
16 on the data type of the object, according to rules described in this
17 chapter. The interpreter runs automatically to evaluate portions of
18 your program, but can also be called explicitly via the Lisp primitive
23 * Intro Eval:: Evaluation in the scheme of things.
24 * Forms:: How various sorts of objects are evaluated.
25 * Quoting:: Avoiding evaluation (to put constants in the program).
26 * Eval:: How to invoke the Lisp interpreter explicitly.
30 @section Introduction to Evaluation
32 The Lisp interpreter, or evaluator, is the part of Emacs that
33 computes the value of an expression that is given to it. When a
34 function written in Lisp is called, the evaluator computes the value
35 of the function by evaluating the expressions in the function body.
36 Thus, running any Lisp program really means running the Lisp
42 A Lisp object that is intended for evaluation is called an
43 @dfn{expression} or a @dfn{form}. The fact that forms are data
44 objects and not merely text is one of the fundamental differences
45 between Lisp-like languages and typical programming languages. Any
46 object can be evaluated, but in practice only numbers, symbols, lists
47 and strings are evaluated very often.
49 In subsequent sections, we will describe the details of what
50 evaluation means for each kind of form.
52 It is very common to read a Lisp form and then evaluate the form,
53 but reading and evaluation are separate activities, and either can be
54 performed alone. Reading per se does not evaluate anything; it
55 converts the printed representation of a Lisp object to the object
56 itself. It is up to the caller of @code{read} to specify whether this
57 object is a form to be evaluated, or serves some entirely different
58 purpose. @xref{Input Functions}.
60 @cindex recursive evaluation
61 Evaluation is a recursive process, and evaluating a form often
62 involves evaluating parts within that form. For instance, when you
63 evaluate a @dfn{function call} form such as @code{(car x)}, Emacs
64 first evaluates the argument (the subform @code{x}). After evaluating
65 the argument, Emacs @dfn{executes} the function (@code{car}), and if
66 the function is written in Lisp, execution works by evaluating the
67 @dfn{body} of the function. (In this example, however, @code{car} is
68 not a Lisp function; it is a primitive function implemented in C.)
69 @xref{Functions}, for more information about functions and function
73 Evaluation takes place in a context called the @dfn{environment},
74 which consists of the current values and bindings of all Lisp
75 variables (@pxref{Variables}).@footnote{This definition of
76 ``environment'' is specifically not intended to include all the data
77 that can affect the result of a program.} Whenever a form refers to a
78 variable without creating a new binding for it, the variable evaluates
79 to the value given by the current environment. Evaluating a form may
80 create a new environment for recursive evaluation, by binding
81 variables (@pxref{Local Variables}). Such environments are temporary,
82 and vanish when the evaluation of the form is complete.
85 Evaluating a form may also make changes that persist; these changes
86 are called @dfn{side effects}. An example of a form that produces a
87 side effect is @code{(setq foo 1)}.
89 Do not confuse evaluation with command key interpretation. The
90 editor command loop translates keyboard input into a command (an
91 interactively callable function) using the active keymaps, and then
92 uses @code{call-interactively} to execute that command. Executing the
93 command usually involves evaluation, if the command is written in
94 Lisp; however, this step is not considered a part of command key
95 interpretation. @xref{Command Loop}.
98 @section Kinds of Forms
100 A Lisp object that is intended to be evaluated is called a @dfn{form}.
101 How Emacs evaluates a form depends on its data type. Emacs has three
102 different kinds of form that are evaluated differently: symbols, lists,
103 and ``all other types.'' This section describes all three kinds, one by
104 one, starting with the ``all other types'' which are self-evaluating
108 * Self-Evaluating Forms:: Forms that evaluate to themselves.
109 * Symbol Forms:: Symbols evaluate as variables.
110 * Classifying Lists:: How to distinguish various sorts of list forms.
111 * Function Indirection:: When a symbol appears as the car of a list,
112 we find the real function via the symbol.
113 * Function Forms:: Forms that call functions.
114 * Macro Forms:: Forms that call macros.
115 * Special Forms:: "Special forms" are idiosyncratic primitives,
116 most of them extremely important.
117 * Autoloading:: Functions set up to load files
118 containing their real definitions.
121 @node Self-Evaluating Forms
122 @subsection Self-Evaluating Forms
123 @cindex vector evaluation
124 @cindex literal evaluation
125 @cindex self-evaluating form
127 A @dfn{self-evaluating form} is any form that is not a list or
128 symbol. Self-evaluating forms evaluate to themselves: the result of
129 evaluation is the same object that was evaluated. Thus, the number 25
130 evaluates to 25, and the string @code{"foo"} evaluates to the string
131 @code{"foo"}. Likewise, evaluating a vector does not cause evaluation
132 of the elements of the vector---it returns the same vector with its
137 '123 ; @r{A number, shown without evaluation.}
141 123 ; @r{Evaluated as usual---result is the same.}
145 (eval '123) ; @r{Evaluated ``by hand''---result is the same.}
149 (eval (eval '123)) ; @r{Evaluating twice changes nothing.}
154 It is common to write numbers, characters, strings, and even vectors
155 in Lisp code, taking advantage of the fact that they self-evaluate.
156 However, it is quite unusual to do this for types that lack a read
157 syntax, because there's no way to write them textually. It is possible
158 to construct Lisp expressions containing these types by means of a Lisp
159 program. Here is an example:
163 ;; @r{Build an expression containing a buffer object.}
164 (setq print-exp (list 'print (current-buffer)))
165 @result{} (print #<buffer eval.texi>)
170 @print{} #<buffer eval.texi>
171 @result{} #<buffer eval.texi>
176 @subsection Symbol Forms
177 @cindex symbol evaluation
179 When a symbol is evaluated, it is treated as a variable. The result
180 is the variable's value, if it has one. If it has none (if its value
181 cell is void), an error is signaled. For more information on the use of
182 variables, see @ref{Variables}.
184 In the following example, we set the value of a symbol with
185 @code{setq}. Then we evaluate the symbol, and get back the value that
203 The symbols @code{nil} and @code{t} are treated specially, so that the
204 value of @code{nil} is always @code{nil}, and the value of @code{t} is
205 always @code{t}; you cannot set or bind them to any other values. Thus,
206 these two symbols act like self-evaluating forms, even though
207 @code{eval} treats them like any other symbol. A symbol whose name
208 starts with @samp{:} also self-evaluates in the same way; likewise,
209 its value ordinarily cannot be changed. @xref{Constant Variables}.
211 @node Classifying Lists
212 @subsection Classification of List Forms
213 @cindex list form evaluation
215 A form that is a nonempty list is either a function call, a macro
216 call, or a special form, according to its first element. These three
217 kinds of forms are evaluated in different ways, described below. The
218 remaining list elements constitute the @dfn{arguments} for the function,
219 macro, or special form.
221 The first step in evaluating a nonempty list is to examine its first
222 element. This element alone determines what kind of form the list is
223 and how the rest of the list is to be processed. The first element is
224 @emph{not} evaluated, as it would be in some Lisp dialects such as
227 @node Function Indirection
228 @subsection Symbol Function Indirection
229 @cindex symbol function indirection
230 @cindex indirection for functions
231 @cindex void function
233 If the first element of the list is a symbol then evaluation
234 examines the symbol's function cell, and uses its contents instead of
235 the original symbol. If the contents are another symbol, this
236 process, called @dfn{symbol function indirection}, is repeated until
237 it obtains a non-symbol. @xref{Function Names}, for more information
238 about symbol function indirection.
240 One possible consequence of this process is an infinite loop, in the
241 event that a symbol's function cell refers to the same symbol. Or a
242 symbol may have a void function cell, in which case the subroutine
243 @code{symbol-function} signals a @code{void-function} error. But if
244 neither of these things happens, we eventually obtain a non-symbol,
245 which ought to be a function or other suitable object.
247 @kindex invalid-function
248 More precisely, we should now have a Lisp function (a lambda
249 expression), a byte-code function, a primitive function, a Lisp macro,
250 a special form, or an autoload object. Each of these types is a case
251 described in one of the following sections. If the object is not one
252 of these types, Emacs signals an @code{invalid-function} error.
254 The following example illustrates the symbol indirection process. We
255 use @code{fset} to set the function cell of a symbol and
256 @code{symbol-function} to get the function cell contents
257 (@pxref{Function Cells}). Specifically, we store the symbol @code{car}
258 into the function cell of @code{first}, and the symbol @code{first} into
259 the function cell of @code{erste}.
263 ;; @r{Build this function cell linkage:}
264 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
265 ;; | #<subr car> | <-- | car | <-- | first | <-- | erste |
266 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
272 (symbol-function 'car)
273 @result{} #<subr car>
284 (erste '(1 2 3)) ; @r{Call the function referenced by @code{erste}.}
289 By contrast, the following example calls a function without any symbol
290 function indirection, because the first element is an anonymous Lisp
291 function, not a symbol.
295 ((lambda (arg) (erste arg))
302 Executing the function itself evaluates its body; this does involve
303 symbol function indirection when calling @code{erste}.
305 The built-in function @code{indirect-function} provides an easy way to
306 perform symbol function indirection explicitly.
309 @defun indirect-function function &optional noerror
310 @anchor{Definition of indirect-function}
311 This function returns the meaning of @var{function} as a function. If
312 @var{function} is a symbol, then it finds @var{function}'s function
313 definition and starts over with that value. If @var{function} is not a
314 symbol, then it returns @var{function} itself.
316 This function signals a @code{void-function} error if the final symbol
317 is unbound and optional argument @var{noerror} is @code{nil} or
318 omitted. Otherwise, if @var{noerror} is non-@code{nil}, it returns
319 @code{nil} if the final symbol is unbound.
321 It signals a @code{cyclic-function-indirection} error if there is a
322 loop in the chain of symbols.
324 Here is how you could define @code{indirect-function} in Lisp:
327 (defun indirect-function (function)
328 (if (symbolp function)
329 (indirect-function (symbol-function function))
335 @subsection Evaluation of Function Forms
336 @cindex function form evaluation
337 @cindex function call
339 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a Lisp function
340 object, byte-code object or primitive function object, then that list is
341 a @dfn{function call}. For example, here is a call to the function
348 The first step in evaluating a function call is to evaluate the
349 remaining elements of the list from left to right. The results are the
350 actual argument values, one value for each list element. The next step
351 is to call the function with this list of arguments, effectively using
352 the function @code{apply} (@pxref{Calling Functions}). If the function
353 is written in Lisp, the arguments are used to bind the argument
354 variables of the function (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}); then the forms
355 in the function body are evaluated in order, and the value of the last
356 body form becomes the value of the function call.
359 @subsection Lisp Macro Evaluation
360 @cindex macro call evaluation
362 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a macro object, then
363 the list is a @dfn{macro call}. When a macro call is evaluated, the
364 elements of the rest of the list are @emph{not} initially evaluated.
365 Instead, these elements themselves are used as the arguments of the
366 macro. The macro definition computes a replacement form, called the
367 @dfn{expansion} of the macro, to be evaluated in place of the original
368 form. The expansion may be any sort of form: a self-evaluating
369 constant, a symbol, or a list. If the expansion is itself a macro call,
370 this process of expansion repeats until some other sort of form results.
372 Ordinary evaluation of a macro call finishes by evaluating the
373 expansion. However, the macro expansion is not necessarily evaluated
374 right away, or at all, because other programs also expand macro calls,
375 and they may or may not evaluate the expansions.
377 Normally, the argument expressions are not evaluated as part of
378 computing the macro expansion, but instead appear as part of the
379 expansion, so they are computed when the expansion is evaluated.
381 For example, given a macro defined as follows:
386 (list 'car (list 'cdr x)))
391 an expression such as @code{(cadr (assq 'handler list))} is a macro
392 call, and its expansion is:
395 (car (cdr (assq 'handler list)))
399 Note that the argument @code{(assq 'handler list)} appears in the
402 @xref{Macros}, for a complete description of Emacs Lisp macros.
405 @subsection Special Forms
406 @cindex special forms
407 @cindex evaluation of special forms
409 A @dfn{special form} is a primitive function specially marked so that
410 its arguments are not all evaluated. Most special forms define control
411 structures or perform variable bindings---things which functions cannot
414 Each special form has its own rules for which arguments are evaluated
415 and which are used without evaluation. Whether a particular argument is
416 evaluated may depend on the results of evaluating other arguments.
418 Here is a list, in alphabetical order, of all of the special forms in
419 Emacs Lisp with a reference to where each is described.
423 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
426 @pxref{Catch and Throw}
432 @pxref{Handling Errors}
435 @pxref{Defining Variables}
438 @pxref{Defining Macros}
441 @pxref{Defining Functions}
444 @pxref{Defining Variables}
447 @pxref{Anonymous Functions}
453 @pxref{Interactive Call}
457 @pxref{Local Variables}
460 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
470 @item save-current-buffer
471 @pxref{Current Buffer}
476 @item save-restriction
479 @item save-window-excursion
480 @pxref{Window Configurations}
483 @pxref{Setting Variables}
486 @pxref{Creating Buffer-Local}
489 @pxref{Mouse Tracking}
492 @pxref{Nonlocal Exits}
497 @item with-output-to-temp-buffer
498 @pxref{Temporary Displays}
501 @cindex CL note---special forms compared
503 @b{Common Lisp note:} Here are some comparisons of special forms in
504 GNU Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp. @code{setq}, @code{if}, and
505 @code{catch} are special forms in both Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp.
506 @code{defun} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but a macro in Common
507 Lisp. @code{save-excursion} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but
508 doesn't exist in Common Lisp. @code{throw} is a special form in
509 Common Lisp (because it must be able to throw multiple values), but it
510 is a function in Emacs Lisp (which doesn't have multiple
515 @subsection Autoloading
517 The @dfn{autoload} feature allows you to call a function or macro
518 whose function definition has not yet been loaded into Emacs. It
519 specifies which file contains the definition. When an autoload object
520 appears as a symbol's function definition, calling that symbol as a
521 function automatically loads the specified file; then it calls the real
522 definition loaded from that file. @xref{Autoload}.
527 The special form @code{quote} returns its single argument, as written,
528 without evaluating it. This provides a way to include constant symbols
529 and lists, which are not self-evaluating objects, in a program. (It is
530 not necessary to quote self-evaluating objects such as numbers, strings,
533 @defspec quote object
534 This special form returns @var{object}, without evaluating it.
537 @cindex @samp{'} for quoting
538 @cindex quoting using apostrophe
539 @cindex apostrophe for quoting
540 Because @code{quote} is used so often in programs, Lisp provides a
541 convenient read syntax for it. An apostrophe character (@samp{'})
542 followed by a Lisp object (in read syntax) expands to a list whose first
543 element is @code{quote}, and whose second element is the object. Thus,
544 the read syntax @code{'x} is an abbreviation for @code{(quote x)}.
546 Here are some examples of expressions that use @code{quote}:
563 @result{} (quote foo)
567 @result{} (quote foo)
571 @result{} [(quote foo)]
575 Other quoting constructs include @code{function} (@pxref{Anonymous
576 Functions}), which causes an anonymous lambda expression written in Lisp
577 to be compiled, and @samp{`} (@pxref{Backquote}), which is used to quote
578 only part of a list, while computing and substituting other parts.
583 Most often, forms are evaluated automatically, by virtue of their
584 occurrence in a program being run. On rare occasions, you may need to
585 write code that evaluates a form that is computed at run time, such as
586 after reading a form from text being edited or getting one from a
587 property list. On these occasions, use the @code{eval} function.
588 Often @code{eval} is not needed and something else should be used instead.
589 For example, to get the value of a variable, while @code{eval} works,
590 @code{symbol-value} is preferable; or rather than store expressions
591 in a property list that then need to go through @code{eval}, it is better to
592 store functions instead that are then passed to @code{funcall}.
594 The functions and variables described in this section evaluate forms,
595 specify limits to the evaluation process, or record recently returned
596 values. Loading a file also does evaluation (@pxref{Loading}).
598 It is generally cleaner and more flexible to store a function in a
599 data structure, and call it with @code{funcall} or @code{apply}, than
600 to store an expression in the data structure and evaluate it. Using
601 functions provides the ability to pass information to them as
604 @defun eval form &optional lexical
605 This is the basic function evaluating an expression. It evaluates
606 @var{form} in the current environment and returns the result. How the
607 evaluation proceeds depends on the type of the object (@pxref{Forms}).
608 @var{lexical} if non-nil means to evaluate @var{form} using lexical scoping
609 rules (@pxref{Lexical Binding}) instead of the default dynamic scoping used
610 historically in Emacs Lisp.
612 Since @code{eval} is a function, the argument expression that appears
613 in a call to @code{eval} is evaluated twice: once as preparation before
614 @code{eval} is called, and again by the @code{eval} function itself.
625 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{foo}}
628 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{bar}, which is the value of @code{foo}}
634 The number of currently active calls to @code{eval} is limited to
635 @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} (see below).
638 @deffn Command eval-region start end &optional stream read-function
639 @anchor{Definition of eval-region}
640 This function evaluates the forms in the current buffer in the region
641 defined by the positions @var{start} and @var{end}. It reads forms from
642 the region and calls @code{eval} on them until the end of the region is
643 reached, or until an error is signaled and not handled.
645 By default, @code{eval-region} does not produce any output. However,
646 if @var{stream} is non-@code{nil}, any output produced by output
647 functions (@pxref{Output Functions}), as well as the values that
648 result from evaluating the expressions in the region are printed using
649 @var{stream}. @xref{Output Streams}.
651 If @var{read-function} is non-@code{nil}, it should be a function,
652 which is used instead of @code{read} to read expressions one by one.
653 This function is called with one argument, the stream for reading
654 input. You can also use the variable @code{load-read-function}
655 (@pxref{Definition of load-read-function,, How Programs Do Loading})
656 to specify this function, but it is more robust to use the
657 @var{read-function} argument.
659 @code{eval-region} does not move point. It always returns @code{nil}.
662 @cindex evaluation of buffer contents
663 @deffn Command eval-buffer &optional buffer-or-name stream filename unibyte print
664 This is similar to @code{eval-region}, but the arguments provide
665 different optional features. @code{eval-buffer} operates on the
666 entire accessible portion of buffer @var{buffer-or-name}.
667 @var{buffer-or-name} can be a buffer, a buffer name (a string), or
668 @code{nil} (or omitted), which means to use the current buffer.
669 @var{stream} is used as in @code{eval-region}, unless @var{stream} is
670 @code{nil} and @var{print} non-@code{nil}. In that case, values that
671 result from evaluating the expressions are still discarded, but the
672 output of the output functions is printed in the echo area.
673 @var{filename} is the file name to use for @code{load-history}
674 (@pxref{Unloading}), and defaults to @code{buffer-file-name}
675 (@pxref{Buffer File Name}). If @var{unibyte} is non-@code{nil},
676 @code{read} converts strings to unibyte whenever possible.
678 @findex eval-current-buffer
679 @code{eval-current-buffer} is an alias for this command.
682 @defopt max-lisp-eval-depth
683 @anchor{Definition of max-lisp-eval-depth}
684 This variable defines the maximum depth allowed in calls to @code{eval},
685 @code{apply}, and @code{funcall} before an error is signaled (with error
686 message @code{"Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-depth"}).
688 This limit, with the associated error when it is exceeded, is one way
689 Emacs Lisp avoids infinite recursion on an ill-defined function. If
690 you increase the value of @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} too much, such
691 code can cause stack overflow instead.
692 @cindex Lisp nesting error
694 The depth limit counts internal uses of @code{eval}, @code{apply}, and
695 @code{funcall}, such as for calling the functions mentioned in Lisp
696 expressions, and recursive evaluation of function call arguments and
697 function body forms, as well as explicit calls in Lisp code.
699 The default value of this variable is 400. If you set it to a value
700 less than 100, Lisp will reset it to 100 if the given value is
701 reached. Entry to the Lisp debugger increases the value, if there is
702 little room left, to make sure the debugger itself has room to
705 @code{max-specpdl-size} provides another limit on nesting.
706 @xref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local Variables}.
710 The value of this variable is a list of the values returned by all the
711 expressions that were read, evaluated, and printed from buffers
712 (including the minibuffer) by the standard Emacs commands which do
713 this. (Note that this does @emph{not} include evaluation in
714 @samp{*ielm*} buffers, nor evaluation using @kbd{C-j} in
715 @code{lisp-interaction-mode}.) The elements are ordered most recent
724 (list 'A (1+ 2) auto-save-default)
729 @result{} ((A 3 t) 1 @dots{})
733 This variable is useful for referring back to values of forms recently
734 evaluated. It is generally a bad idea to print the value of
735 @code{values} itself, since this may be very long. Instead, examine
736 particular elements, like this:
740 ;; @r{Refer to the most recent evaluation result.}
745 ;; @r{That put a new element on,}
746 ;; @r{so all elements move back one.}
751 ;; @r{This gets the element that was next-to-most-recent}
752 ;; @r{before this example.}