2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999
4 @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../info/control
7 @node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top
8 @chapter Control Structures
9 @cindex special forms for control structures
10 @cindex control structures
12 A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}).
13 We control the order of execution of these forms by enclosing them in
14 @dfn{control structures}. Control structures are special forms which
15 control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they
18 The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form
19 @var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you
20 write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
21 level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order
22 written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function
23 body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the
24 function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of
25 evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function.
27 Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other
30 Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including
31 other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled)
32 jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are
33 special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not
34 evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control
35 structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).
38 * Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order.
39 * Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}.
40 * Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
41 * Iteration:: @code{while} loops.
42 * Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence.
48 Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way
49 control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a
50 function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a
51 control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest
52 control construct of Lisp.
54 A @code{progn} special form looks like this:
58 (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
63 and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in
64 that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form.
65 The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
66 @code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}.
68 @cindex implicit @code{progn}
69 In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute
70 two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.
71 But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the
72 body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So
73 the body of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'':
74 several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.
75 Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.
76 As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago.
77 It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and},
78 @code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}.
80 @defspec progn forms@dots{}
81 This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
82 order, returning the result of the final form.
86 (progn (print "The first form")
87 (print "The second form")
88 (print "The third form"))
89 @print{} "The first form"
90 @print{} "The second form"
91 @print{} "The third form"
92 @result{} "The third form"
97 Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
100 @defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
101 This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
102 textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.
106 (prog1 (print "The first form")
107 (print "The second form")
108 (print "The third form"))
109 @print{} "The first form"
110 @print{} "The second form"
111 @print{} "The third form"
112 @result{} "The first form"
116 Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
117 @code{x}, then return the value of that former element:
120 (prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
124 @defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
125 This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
126 following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
131 (prog2 (print "The first form")
132 (print "The second form")
133 (print "The third form"))
134 @print{} "The first form"
135 @print{} "The second form"
136 @print{} "The third form"
137 @result{} "The second form"
143 @section Conditionals
144 @cindex conditional evaluation
146 Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp
147 has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in
148 other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of
149 @code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.
151 @defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
152 @code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
153 based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is
154 non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
155 Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
156 value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
157 an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.)
159 If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
160 given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.
162 @code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is
163 never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in the example below,
164 @code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called.
176 @defmac when condition then-forms@dots{}
177 This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms},
178 and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular,
181 (when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
185 is entirely equivalent to
188 (if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil)
192 @defmac unless condition forms@dots{}
193 This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}:
196 (unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
200 is entirely equivalent to
203 (if @var{condition} nil
204 @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
208 @defspec cond clause@dots{}
209 @code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each
210 @var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this
211 list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
212 @var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this:
215 (@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
218 @code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
219 @var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is
220 non-@code{nil}, the clause ``succeeds''; then @code{cond} evaluates its
221 @var{body-forms}, and the value of the last of @var{body-forms} becomes
222 the value of the @code{cond}. The remaining clauses are ignored.
224 If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails'', so
225 the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its
228 If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
229 fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.
231 A clause may also look like this:
238 Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of
239 @var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form.
241 The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
242 the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
247 (cond ((numberp x) x)
250 (setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
251 (buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause}
252 ((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
256 Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous
257 clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the
258 @var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
259 @var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is
260 never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond}
268 (cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo)
275 This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a}
276 is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
279 Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with
280 @code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style.
285 (if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
287 (cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
291 @node Combining Conditions
292 @section Constructs for Combining Conditions
294 This section describes three constructs that are often used together
295 with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The
296 constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
297 kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
300 This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
301 @code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
302 The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
303 using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
306 @defspec and conditions@dots{}
307 The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
308 true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
311 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
312 of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
313 @var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring
314 the remaining @var{conditions}.
316 If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
317 the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just
318 @code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate
319 because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think
320 about it; which one did not?)
322 Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
323 not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
324 which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
325 remaining condition is never evaluated.
329 (and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
336 Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:
340 (if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
341 (message "foo is a list starting with x"))
346 Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
347 @code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.
349 @code{and} can be expressed in terms of either @code{if} or @code{cond}.
354 (and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
356 (if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
358 (cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
363 @defspec or conditions@dots{}
364 The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
365 @var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the
366 @var{conditions} one by one in the order written.
368 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
369 the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns
370 right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it
371 returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated.
373 If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
374 expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no
375 @var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the
376 @var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one
379 For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either
380 @code{nil} or the integer zero:
383 (or (eq x nil) (eq x 0))
386 Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
387 @code{cond}. For example:
391 (or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
399 You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:
403 (if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
404 (if @var{arg2} @var{arg2}
410 This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
411 @var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
412 @var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
420 Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For
421 example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element
422 of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this
423 in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}:
425 @defspec while condition forms@dots{}
426 @code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is
427 non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it
428 reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
429 evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition}
430 evaluates to @code{nil}.
432 There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop
433 will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
434 until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).
436 The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.
445 (princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
447 @print{} Iteration 0.
448 @print{} Iteration 1.
449 @print{} Iteration 2.
450 @print{} Iteration 3.
455 To write a ``repeat...until'' loop, which will execute something on each
456 iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the
457 end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as
464 (not (looking-at "^$"))))
469 This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it
470 reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no
471 body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point).
474 The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to
475 write two common kinds of loops.
477 @defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{}
479 This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of @var{list},
480 using the variable @var{var} to hold the current element. Then it
481 returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if
482 @var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you could use
483 @code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function:
486 (defun reverse (list)
488 (dolist (elt list value)
489 (setq value (cons elt value)))))
493 @defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{}
495 This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0
496 (inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), using the variable @var{var} to
497 hold the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value
498 of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted.
499 Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} do something 100 times:
503 (insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n"))
508 @section Nonlocal Exits
509 @cindex nonlocal exits
511 A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
512 program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
513 as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
514 Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
518 * Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
519 * Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
520 * Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled.
521 * Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
524 @node Catch and Throw
525 @subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}
527 Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
528 construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
529 rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
530 request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
531 only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
532 that @code{catch}. For example:
549 The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to
550 the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code
551 following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of
552 @code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}.
554 The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the
555 first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is
556 @code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more
557 than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.
558 Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and
559 the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that
560 @code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching
561 @code{catch} in between).
563 Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching
564 @code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such as
565 @code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings are
566 unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally
567 (@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer
568 and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and
569 the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window
570 selection saved by @code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window
571 Configurations}). It also runs any cleanups established with the
572 @code{unwind-protect} special form when it exits that form
575 The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
576 that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function
577 called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place
578 chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
579 before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why
580 @code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
581 that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).
583 @cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
585 @b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
586 have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
587 @code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only
591 @defspec catch tag body@dots{}
592 @cindex tag on run time stack
593 @code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.
594 The return point is distinguished from other such return points by
595 @var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument
596 @var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established.
598 With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the
599 @var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without
600 error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from
603 If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body},
604 specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits
605 immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the
606 second argument of @code{throw}.
609 @defun throw tag value
610 The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
611 established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
612 among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
613 specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag},
614 the innermost one is used.
616 The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
620 If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
621 error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
624 @node Examples of Catch
625 @subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}
627 One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
628 nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to''.)
629 Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
641 (throw 'loop (list i j)))
648 If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
649 list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
650 @code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
651 is the result of the @code{while}.
653 Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
654 return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag,
667 (print (catch2 'hack))
675 Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
676 the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore,
677 @code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
678 printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
679 @code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.
681 Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:
686 (print (catch2 'quux))
693 We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has
694 the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.
695 Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value
696 @code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the
697 body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated.
703 When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
704 cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.
706 When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an
707 error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is
708 the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
709 the end of the buffer.
711 In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
712 For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
713 structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before
714 the program is finished. In such cases, you would use
715 @code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
716 evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may
717 wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.
718 In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish
719 @dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error.
721 Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
722 one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}
723 instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}.
726 * Signaling Errors:: How to report an error.
727 * Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error.
728 * Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution.
729 * Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them.
732 @node Signaling Errors
733 @subsubsection How to Signal an Error
734 @cindex signaling errors
736 Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives
737 which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
738 @sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
739 buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
740 @code{error} and @code{signal}.
742 Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not
743 considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error.
746 The error message should state what is wrong (``File does not
747 exist''), not how things ought to be (``File must exist''). The
748 convention in Emacs Lisp is that error messages should start with a
749 capital letter, but should not end with any sort of punctuation.
751 @defun error format-string &rest args
752 This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
753 applying @code{format} (@pxref{String Conversion}) to
754 @var{format-string} and @var{args}.
756 These examples show typical uses of @code{error}:
760 (error "That is an error -- try something else")
761 @error{} That is an error -- try something else
765 (error "You have committed %d errors" 10)
766 @error{} You have committed 10 errors
770 @code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
771 error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
774 @strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message
775 verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string}
776 contains @samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with
777 undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}.
780 @defun signal error-symbol data
781 This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The
782 argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to the
783 circumstances of the error.
785 The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
786 bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of
787 condition names. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different sorts of
790 The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
791 @var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error,
792 there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type
793 that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type.
794 @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols.
796 Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
797 handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local
798 variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
799 @var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}). If the error is not handled,
800 these two values are used in printing the error message.
802 The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions
803 it could sometimes return).
807 (signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
808 @error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
812 (signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition"))
813 @error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition"
818 @cindex CL note---no continuable errors
820 @b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
821 concept of continuable errors.
824 @node Processing of Errors
825 @subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors
827 When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active
828 @dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp
829 expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the
830 Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is
831 executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler
832 executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that
833 established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case}
834 have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them.
836 If there is no applicable handler for the error, the current command is
837 terminated and control returns to the editor command loop, because the
838 command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors. The
839 command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to
840 print an error message.
842 @cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
843 An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The
844 debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error
845 Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs
846 in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of
847 variables precisely as they were at the time of the error.
849 @node Handling Errors
850 @subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
851 @cindex error handler
852 @cindex handling errors
854 The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command
855 that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop.
856 You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
857 establishing an error handler, with the special form
858 @code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this:
863 (delete-file filename)
869 This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
870 returning @code{nil} if an error occurs.
872 The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
873 @dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a
874 call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when
875 this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
876 They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they
877 are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in
878 their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly
879 speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
880 @code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
881 protected form itself.
883 The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler
884 lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
885 which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error
886 is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies
887 to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example
888 above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
889 @code{error}, which covers all errors.
891 The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
892 starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested
893 @code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of
894 the two gets to handle it.
896 If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this
897 ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if
898 @code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger.
899 @xref{Error Debugging}. If you want to be able to debug errors that are
900 caught by a @code{condition-case}, set the variable
901 @code{debug-on-signal} to a non-@code{nil} value.
903 When an error is handled, control returns to the handler. Before this
904 happens, Emacs unbinds all variable bindings made by binding constructs
905 that are being exited and executes the cleanups of all
906 @code{unwind-protect} forms that are exited. Once control arrives at
907 the handler, the body of the handler is executed.
909 After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the
910 @code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited
911 completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume
912 execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
913 bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is
914 clean up and proceed.
916 The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that
917 are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
918 @code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are
919 totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
922 Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
923 @code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate
924 facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a
925 @code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using
926 @code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error
927 that can be handled).
929 @defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
930 This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
931 the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes
932 without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
933 @code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
934 no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
935 error occurs during @var{protected-form}.
937 Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
938 @var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name
939 to be handled, or a list of condition names; @var{body} is one or more
940 Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.
941 Here are examples of handlers:
947 (arith-error (message "Division by zero"))
949 ((arith-error file-error)
951 "Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
955 Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what
956 kind of error it is. The @code{error-conditions} property of this
957 symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs
958 searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that
959 specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching
960 @code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this
961 @code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error.
963 After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case}
964 returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body
965 as the overall value.
967 @cindex error description
968 The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not
969 bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
970 handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an
971 @dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the
972 error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol}
973 . @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to
974 do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file
975 name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the
978 If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the
979 error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler.
982 @defun error-message-string error-description
983 This function returns the error message string for a given error
984 descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the
985 usual error message for that error.
988 @cindex @code{arith-error} example
989 Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
990 that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error
991 message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number.
995 (defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
997 ;; @r{Protected form.}
1002 (arith-error ; @r{Condition.}
1003 ;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.}
1004 (message "%s" (error-message-string err))
1006 @result{} safe-divide
1011 @print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
1017 The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}. Thus,
1022 @error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
1026 Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
1027 including those signaled with @code{error}:
1039 ;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
1040 (error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz))
1041 ;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
1042 (error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err))
1044 @print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35")
1050 @subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
1051 @cindex error symbol
1053 @cindex condition name
1054 @cindex user-defined error
1055 @kindex error-conditions
1057 When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
1058 the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one
1059 error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of
1060 errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language.
1062 These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
1063 classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
1064 names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
1065 themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also
1066 condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
1067 @code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors. Thus, each error has
1068 one or more condition names: @code{error}, the error symbol if that
1069 is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some intermediate
1072 In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must have an
1073 @code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names.
1074 This list defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to.
1075 (The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be
1076 members of this list.) Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is
1077 defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols.
1079 In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol
1080 should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to
1081 be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If the
1082 @code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error
1083 message @samp{peculiar error} is used.
1084 @cindex peculiar error
1086 Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:
1092 '(error my-own-errors new-error))
1093 @result{} (error my-own-errors new-error)
1096 (put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error")
1097 @result{} "A new error"
1102 This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
1103 classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
1104 classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
1106 The error string should start with a capital letter but it should
1107 not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs.
1109 Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only
1110 an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Signaling Errors}) in your
1115 (signal 'new-error '(x y))
1116 @error{} A new error: x, y
1120 This error can be handled through any of the three condition names.
1121 This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
1122 @code{my-own-errors}:
1128 (my-own-errors nil))
1132 The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
1133 names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol
1134 serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
1135 and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give
1136 @code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol.
1138 By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
1139 seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names
1140 make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
1141 when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would
1142 eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.
1144 @xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols
1145 and their conditions.
1148 @subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits
1150 The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
1151 temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
1152 you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or throw.
1154 @defspec unwind-protect body cleanup-forms@dots{}
1155 @cindex cleanup forms
1156 @cindex protected forms
1157 @cindex error cleanup
1159 @code{unwind-protect} executes the @var{body} with a guarantee that the
1160 @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves @var{body}, no
1161 matter how that happens. The @var{body} may complete normally, or
1162 execute a @code{throw} out of the @code{unwind-protect}, or cause an
1163 error; in all cases, the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.
1165 If the @var{body} forms finish normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns
1166 the value of the last @var{body} form, after it evaluates the
1167 @var{cleanup-forms}. If the @var{body} forms do not finish,
1168 @code{unwind-protect} does not return any value in the normal sense.
1170 Only the @var{body} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any
1171 of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a
1172 @code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not}
1173 guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the
1174 @var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect it
1175 with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.
1177 The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
1178 together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
1179 @code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Local Variables}).
1182 For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
1183 make sure to kill it before finishing:
1188 (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
1192 (kill-buffer buffer))))
1197 You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
1198 (current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
1199 However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body} happens to get an
1200 error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively, you could
1201 write another @code{save-excursion} around the body, to ensure that the
1202 temporary buffer becomes current again in time to kill it.)
1204 Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which
1205 expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Current Buffer}).
1206 Several of the macros defined in this manual use @code{unwind-protect}
1210 Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a
1211 process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
1212 machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
1213 numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it
1214 is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the
1215 event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless
1223 (setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
1224 (if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
1225 (message "Logged in")
1226 (error "Ftp login failed")))
1227 (or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
1231 This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
1232 quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
1233 @code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
1234 set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug,
1235 but at least it is very unlikely.