2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2004
4 @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../info/functions
7 @node Functions, Macros, Variables, Top
10 A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter
11 explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to
15 * What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology.
16 * Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects.
17 * Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function.
18 * Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions.
19 * Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function.
20 * Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc.
21 * Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names.
22 * Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition
24 * Inline Functions:: Defining functions that the compiler will open code.
25 * Function Safety:: Determining whether a function is safe to call.
26 * Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives
27 that have a special bearing on how functions work.
30 @node What Is a Function
31 @section What Is a Function?
33 In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying on a computation
34 given several values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of the
35 computation is called the value of the function. The computation can
36 also have side effects: lasting changes in the values of variables or
37 the contents of data structures.
39 Here are important terms for functions in Emacs Lisp and for other
40 function-like objects.
45 In Emacs Lisp, a @dfn{function} is anything that can be applied to
46 arguments in a Lisp program. In some cases, we use it more
47 specifically to mean a function written in Lisp. Special forms and
48 macros are not functions.
53 @cindex built-in function
54 A @dfn{primitive} is a function callable from Lisp that is written in C,
55 such as @code{car} or @code{append}. These functions are also called
56 @dfn{built-in functions}, or @dfn{subrs}. (Special forms are also
57 considered primitives.)
59 Usually the reason we implement a function as a primitive is either
60 because it is fundamental, because it provides a low-level interface
61 to operating system services, or because it needs to run fast.
62 Primitives can be modified or added only by changing the C sources and
63 recompiling the editor. See @ref{Writing Emacs Primitives}.
65 @item lambda expression
66 A @dfn{lambda expression} is a function written in Lisp.
67 These are described in the following section.
69 @xref{Lambda Expressions}.
73 A @dfn{special form} is a primitive that is like a function but does not
74 evaluate all of its arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only
75 some of the arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or
76 several times. Many special forms are described in @ref{Control
81 A @dfn{macro} is a construct defined in Lisp by the programmer. It
82 differs from a function in that it translates a Lisp expression that you
83 write into an equivalent expression to be evaluated instead of the
84 original expression. Macros enable Lisp programmers to do the sorts of
85 things that special forms can do. @xref{Macros}, for how to define and
90 A @dfn{command} is an object that @code{command-execute} can invoke; it
91 is a possible definition for a key sequence. Some functions are
92 commands; a function written in Lisp is a command if it contains an
93 interactive declaration (@pxref{Defining Commands}). Such a function
94 can be called from Lisp expressions like other functions; in this case,
95 the fact that the function is a command makes no difference.
97 Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though
98 they are not functions. A symbol is a command if its function
99 definition is a command; such symbols can be invoked with @kbd{M-x}.
100 The symbol is a function as well if the definition is a function.
101 @xref{Command Overview}.
103 @item keystroke command
104 @cindex keystroke command
105 A @dfn{keystroke command} is a command that is bound to a key sequence
106 (typically one to three keystrokes). The distinction is made here
107 merely to avoid confusion with the meaning of ``command'' in non-Emacs
108 editors; for Lisp programs, the distinction is normally unimportant.
110 @item byte-code function
111 A @dfn{byte-code function} is a function that has been compiled by the
112 byte compiler. @xref{Byte-Code Type}.
115 @defun functionp object
116 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is any kind of
117 function, or a special form, or, recursively, a symbol whose function
118 definition is a function or special form. (This does not include
122 Unlike @code{functionp}, the next three functions do @emph{not}
123 treat a symbol as its function definition.
126 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function
127 (i.e., a Lisp primitive).
131 (subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,}
132 @result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.}
135 (subrp (symbol-function 'message))
141 @defun byte-code-function-p object
142 This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a byte-code
143 function. For example:
147 (byte-code-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line))
153 @defun subr-arity subr
155 This function provides information about the argument list of a
156 primitive, @var{subr}. The returned value is a pair
157 @code{(@var{min} . @var{max})}. @var{min} is the minimum number of
158 args. @var{max} is the maximum number or the symbol @code{many}, for a
159 function with @code{&rest} arguments, or the symbol @code{unevalled} if
160 @var{subr} is a special form.
163 @node Lambda Expressions
164 @section Lambda Expressions
165 @cindex lambda expression
167 A function written in Lisp is a list that looks like this:
170 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
171 @r{[}@var{documentation-string}@r{]}
172 @r{[}@var{interactive-declaration}@r{]}
173 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
177 Such a list is called a @dfn{lambda expression}. In Emacs Lisp, it
178 actually is valid as an expression---it evaluates to itself. In some
179 other Lisp dialects, a lambda expression is not a valid expression at
180 all. In either case, its main use is not to be evaluated as an
181 expression, but to be called as a function.
184 * Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression.
185 * Simple Lambda:: A simple example.
186 * Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists.
187 * Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function.
190 @node Lambda Components
191 @subsection Components of a Lambda Expression
195 A function written in Lisp (a ``lambda expression'') is a list that
199 (lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
200 [@var{documentation-string}]
201 [@var{interactive-declaration}]
202 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
207 The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol
208 @code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The
209 reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that
210 other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as
213 The second element is a list of symbols---the argument variable names.
214 This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called,
215 the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda
216 list, which are given local bindings with the values provided.
217 @xref{Local Variables}.
219 The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the
220 function definition to describe the function for the Emacs help
221 facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}.
223 The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive
224 @var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the
225 function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called
226 @dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key.
227 Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive
228 declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive
231 @cindex body of function
232 The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp
233 code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say,
234 ``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the
235 function is the value returned by the last element of the body.
238 @subsection A Simple Lambda-Expression Example
240 Consider for example the following function:
243 (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
247 We can call this function by writing it as the @sc{car} of an
248 expression, like this:
252 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
258 This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable
259 @code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3.
260 Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6;
261 therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6.
263 Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in
268 ((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
274 This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5
275 4)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the
276 argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8.
278 It is not often useful to write a lambda expression as the @sc{car} of
279 a form in this way. You can get the same result, of making local
280 variables and giving them values, using the special form @code{let}
281 (@pxref{Local Variables}). And @code{let} is clearer and easier to use.
282 In practice, lambda expressions are either stored as the function
283 definitions of symbols, to produce named functions, or passed as
284 arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}).
286 However, calls to explicit lambda expressions were very useful in the
287 old days of Lisp, before the special form @code{let} was invented. At
288 that time, they were the only way to bind and initialize local
292 @subsection Other Features of Argument Lists
293 @kindex wrong-number-of-arguments
294 @cindex argument binding
295 @cindex binding arguments
297 Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))},
298 specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three
299 arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four
300 arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error.
302 It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain
303 arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{substring}
304 accepts three arguments---a string, the start index and the end
305 index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the
306 string if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to
307 accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list}
310 @cindex optional arguments
311 @cindex rest arguments
314 To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function
315 is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional
316 arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the
317 keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument.
319 Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
323 (@var{required-vars}@dots{}
324 @r{[}&optional @var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]}
325 @r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]})
330 The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
331 clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
333 A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
334 @var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of
335 the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond
336 that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may
337 be any number of extra actual arguments.
339 If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted,
340 then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the
341 function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and
342 an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to
343 consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value.
344 This is what @code{substring} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to
345 @code{substring} means to use the length of the string supplied.
347 @cindex CL note---default optional arg
349 @b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what
350 default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp
351 always uses @code{nil}. Emacs Lisp does not support ``supplied-p''
352 variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
355 For example, an argument list that looks like this:
358 (a b &optional c d &rest e)
362 binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are
363 required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and
364 @code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first
365 four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list. If
366 there are only two arguments, @code{c} is @code{nil}; if two or three
367 arguments, @code{d} is @code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e}
370 There is no way to have required arguments following optional
371 ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose
372 that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required.
373 Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the
374 third argument be for? Would it be used for the @var{c}, or for
375 @var{d}? One can argue for both possibilities. Similarly, it makes
376 no sense to have any more arguments (either required or optional)
377 after a @code{&rest} argument.
379 Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
382 ((lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:}
383 1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.}
385 ((lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:}
386 (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.}
389 ((lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:}
390 (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.}
395 @node Function Documentation
396 @subsection Documentation Strings of Functions
397 @cindex documentation of function
399 A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string} just
400 after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of the
401 function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment which
402 actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the Emacs help
403 facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the @var{documentation-string} is
406 It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the
407 functions in your program, even those that are called only from within
408 your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they
409 are easier to access.
411 The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own,
412 because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist
413 of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose.
415 The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the
416 source file, but since these spaces come before the starting
417 double-quote, they are not part of the string. Some people make a
418 practice of indenting any additional lines of the string so that the
419 text lines up in the program source. @emph{That is a mistake.} The
420 indentation of the following lines is inside the string; what looks
421 nice in the source code will look ugly when displayed by the help
424 You may wonder how the documentation string could be optional, since
425 there are required components of the function that follow it (the body).
426 Since evaluation of a string returns that string, without any side effects,
427 it has no effect if it is not the last form in the body. Thus, in
428 practice, there is no confusion between the first form of the body and the
429 documentation string; if the only body form is a string then it serves both
430 as the return value and as the documentation.
432 The last line of the documentation string can specify calling
433 conventions different from the actual function arguments. Write
441 following a blank line, at the beginning of the line, with no newline
442 following it inside the documentation string. (The @samp{\} is used
443 to avoid confusing the Emacs motion commands.) The calling convention
444 specified in this way appears in help messages in place of the one
445 derived from the actual arguments of the function.
447 This feature is particularly useful for macro definitions, since the
448 arguments written in a macro definition often do not correspond to the
449 way users think of the parts of the macro call.
452 @section Naming a Function
453 @cindex function definition
454 @cindex named function
455 @cindex function name
457 In most computer languages, every function has a name; the idea of a
458 function without a name is nonsensical. In Lisp, a function in the
459 strictest sense has no name. It is simply a list whose first element is
460 @code{lambda}, a byte-code function object, or a primitive subr-object.
462 However, a symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens
463 when you put the function in the symbol's @dfn{function cell}
464 (@pxref{Symbol Components}). Then the symbol itself becomes a valid,
465 callable function, equivalent to the list or subr-object that its
466 function cell refers to. The contents of the function cell are also
467 called the symbol's @dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a
468 symbol's function definition in place of the symbol is called
469 @dfn{symbol function indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}.
471 In practice, nearly all functions are given names in this way and
472 referred to through their names. For example, the symbol @code{car} works
473 as a function and does what it does because the primitive subr-object
474 @code{#<subr car>} is stored in its function cell.
476 We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by
477 their names in Lisp expressions. For primitive subr-objects such as
478 @code{#<subr car>}, names are the only way you can refer to them: there
479 is no read syntax for such objects. For functions written in Lisp, the
480 name is more convenient to use in a call than an explicit lambda
481 expression. Also, a function with a name can refer to itself---it can
482 be recursive. Writing the function's name in its own definition is much
483 more convenient than making the function definition point to itself
484 (something that is not impossible but that has various disadvantages in
487 We often identify functions with the symbols used to name them. For
488 example, we often speak of ``the function @code{car}'', not
489 distinguishing between the symbol @code{car} and the primitive
490 subr-object that is its function definition. For most purposes, the
491 distinction is not important.
493 Even so, keep in mind that a function need not have a unique name. While
494 a given function object @emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only
495 one symbol, this is just a matter of convenience. It is easy to store
496 it in several symbols using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is
497 equally well a name for the same function.
499 A symbol used as a function name may also be used as a variable; these
500 two uses of a symbol are independent and do not conflict. (Some Lisp
501 dialects, such as Scheme, do not distinguish between a symbol's value
502 and its function definition; a symbol's value as a variable is also its
503 function definition.) If you have not given a symbol a function
504 definition, you cannot use it as a function; whether the symbol has a
505 value as a variable makes no difference to this.
507 @node Defining Functions
508 @section Defining Functions
509 @cindex defining a function
511 We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This
512 is called @dfn{defining a function}, and it is done with the
513 @code{defun} special form.
515 @defspec defun name argument-list body-forms
516 @code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It
517 defines the symbol @var{name} as a function that looks like this:
520 (lambda @var{argument-list} . @var{body-forms})
523 @code{defun} stores this lambda expression in the function cell of
524 @var{name}. It returns the value @var{name}, but usually we ignore this
527 As described previously (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}),
528 @var{argument-list} is a list of argument names and may include the
529 keywords @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}. Also, the first two of the
530 @var{body-forms} may be a documentation string and an interactive
533 There is no conflict if the same symbol @var{name} is also used as a
534 variable, since the symbol's value cell is independent of the function
535 cell. @xref{Symbol Components}.
537 Here are some examples:
550 (defun bar (a &optional b &rest c)
556 @result{} (1 2 (3 4 5))
560 @result{} (1 nil nil)
564 @error{} Wrong number of arguments.
568 (defun capitalize-backwards ()
569 "Upcase the last letter of a word."
575 @result{} capitalize-backwards
579 Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally.
580 @code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car}
581 without any hesitation or notification. Redefining a function already
582 defined is often done deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish
583 deliberate redefinition from unintentional redefinition.
586 @defun defalias name definition &optional docstring
587 @anchor{Definition of defalias}
588 This special form defines the symbol @var{name} as a function, with
589 definition @var{definition} (which can be any valid Lisp function).
590 It returns @var{definition}.
592 If @var{docstring} is non-@code{nil}, it becomes the function
593 documentation of @var{name}. Otherwise, any documentation provided by
594 @var{definition} is used.
596 The proper place to use @code{defalias} is where a specific function
597 name is being defined---especially where that name appears explicitly in
598 the source file being loaded. This is because @code{defalias} records
599 which file defined the function, just like @code{defun}
602 By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other
603 purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such
607 You cannot create a new primitive function with @code{defun} or
608 @code{defalias}, but you can use them to change the function definition of
609 any symbol, even one such as @code{car} or @code{x-popup-menu} whose
610 normal definition is a primitive. However, this is risky: for
611 instance, it is next to impossible to redefine @code{car} without
612 breaking Lisp completely. Redefining an obscure function such as
613 @code{x-popup-menu} is less dangerous, but it still may not work as
614 you expect. If there are calls to the primitive from C code, they
615 call the primitive's C definition directly, so changing the symbol's
616 definition will have no effect on them.
618 See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun}
619 and tells the Lisp compiler to open-code it. @xref{Inline Functions}.
621 @node Calling Functions
622 @section Calling Functions
623 @cindex function invocation
624 @cindex calling a function
626 Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do
627 anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a
628 function is also known as @dfn{invocation}.
630 The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list.
631 For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the
632 function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}.
633 @xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation.
635 When you write a list as an expression in your program, you specify
636 which function to call, and how many arguments to give it, in the text
637 of the program. Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you
638 need to compute at run time which function to call. To do that, use
639 the function @code{funcall}. When you also need to determine at run
640 time how many arguments to pass, use @code{apply}.
642 @defun funcall function &rest arguments
643 @code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns
644 whatever @var{function} returns.
646 Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including
647 @var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This
648 means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be
649 called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the
650 expressions you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values.
651 These values are @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of
652 calling @var{function}; the operation of @code{funcall} is like the
653 normal procedure for calling a function, once its arguments have
654 already been evaluated.
656 The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a
657 primitive function. Special forms and macros are not allowed, because
658 they make sense only when given the ``unevaluated'' argument
659 expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw
660 above, it never knows them in the first place.
672 (funcall f 'x 'y '(z))
677 @error{} Invalid function: #<subr and>
681 Compare these examples with the examples of @code{apply}.
684 @defun apply function &rest arguments
685 @code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like
686 @code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a
687 list of objects, which are passed to @var{function} as separate
688 arguments, rather than a single list. We say that @code{apply}
689 @dfn{spreads} this list so that each individual element becomes an
692 @code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with
693 @code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a
694 primitive function; special forms and macros do not make sense in
704 @error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z
707 (apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4))
711 (apply '+ '(1 2 3 4))
716 (apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil))
717 @result{} (a b c x y z)
721 For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see @ref{Definition
726 It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or
727 find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property
728 lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions
729 that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}.
731 Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op
732 function as the argument. Here are two different kinds of no-op
736 This function returns @var{arg} and has no side effects.
739 @defun ignore &rest args
740 This function ignores any arguments and returns @code{nil}.
743 @node Mapping Functions
744 @section Mapping Functions
745 @cindex mapping functions
747 A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function (@emph{not} a
748 special form or macro) to each element of a list or other collection.
749 Emacs Lisp has several such functions; @code{mapcar} and
750 @code{mapconcat}, which scan a list, are described here.
751 @xref{Definition of mapatoms}, for the function @code{mapatoms} which
752 maps over the symbols in an obarray. @xref{Definition of maphash},
753 for the function @code{maphash} which maps over key/value associations
756 These mapping functions do not allow char-tables because a char-table
757 is a sparse array whose nominal range of indices is very large. To map
758 over a char-table in a way that deals properly with its sparse nature,
759 use the function @code{map-char-table} (@pxref{Char-Tables}).
761 @defun mapcar function sequence
762 @anchor{Definition of mapcar}
763 @code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence}
764 in turn, and returns a list of the results.
766 The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence except a
767 char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a string. The
768 result is always a list. The length of the result is the same as the
769 length of @var{sequence}.
773 @exdent @r{For example:}
775 (mapcar 'car '((a b) (c d) (e f)))
779 (mapcar 'char-to-string "abc")
780 @result{} ("a" "b" "c")
784 ;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.}
785 (mapcar 'funcall my-hooks)
789 (defun mapcar* (function &rest args)
790 "Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS.
791 Return the list of results."
792 ;; @r{If no list is exhausted,}
793 (if (not (memq nil args))
794 ;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.}
795 (cons (apply function (mapcar 'car args))
796 (apply 'mapcar* function
797 ;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.}
798 (mapcar 'cdr args)))))
802 (mapcar* 'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4))
803 @result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3))
808 @defun mapc function sequence
810 @code{mapc} is like @code{mapcar} except that @var{function} is used for
811 side-effects only---the values it returns are ignored, not collected
812 into a list. @code{mapc} always returns @var{sequence}.
815 @defun mapconcat function sequence separator
816 @code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of
817 @var{sequence}: the results, which must be strings, are concatenated.
818 Between each pair of result strings, @code{mapconcat} inserts the string
819 @var{separator}. Usually @var{separator} contains a space or comma or
820 other suitable punctuation.
822 The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one
823 argument and return a string. The argument @var{sequence} can be any
824 kind of sequence except a char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a
825 bool-vector, or a string.
829 (mapconcat 'symbol-name
830 '(The cat in the hat)
832 @result{} "The cat in the hat"
836 (mapconcat (function (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x))))
844 @node Anonymous Functions
845 @section Anonymous Functions
846 @cindex anonymous function
848 In Lisp, a function is a list that starts with @code{lambda}, a
849 byte-code function compiled from such a list, or alternatively a
850 primitive subr-object; names are ``extra''. Although usually functions
851 are defined with @code{defun} and given names at the same time, it is
852 occasionally more concise to use an explicit lambda expression---an
853 anonymous function. Such a list is valid wherever a function name is.
855 Any method of creating such a list makes a valid function. Even this:
859 (setq silly (append '(lambda (x)) (list (list '+ (* 3 4) 'x))))
860 @result{} (lambda (x) (+ 12 x))
865 This computes a list that looks like @code{(lambda (x) (+ 12 x))} and
866 makes it the value (@emph{not} the function definition!) of
869 Here is how we might call this function:
879 (It does @emph{not} work to write @code{(silly 1)}, because this function
880 is not the @emph{function definition} of @code{silly}. We have not given
881 @code{silly} any function definition, just a value as a variable.)
883 Most of the time, anonymous functions are constants that appear in
884 your program. For example, you might want to pass one as an argument to
885 the function @code{mapcar}, which applies any given function to each
888 Here we define a function @code{change-property} which
889 uses a function as its third argument:
893 (defun change-property (symbol prop function)
894 (let ((value (get symbol prop)))
895 (put symbol prop (funcall function value))))
900 Here we define a function that uses @code{change-property},
901 passing it a function to double a number:
905 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
906 (change-property symbol prop '(lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
911 In such cases, we usually use the special form @code{function} instead
912 of simple quotation to quote the anonymous function, like this:
916 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
917 (change-property symbol prop
918 (function (lambda (x) (* 2 x)))))
922 Using @code{function} instead of @code{quote} makes a difference if you
923 compile the function @code{double-property}. For example, if you
924 compile the second definition of @code{double-property}, the anonymous
925 function is compiled as well. By contrast, if you compile the first
926 definition which uses ordinary @code{quote}, the argument passed to
927 @code{change-property} is the precise list shown:
934 The Lisp compiler cannot assume this list is a function, even though it
935 looks like one, since it does not know what @code{change-property} will
936 do with the list. Perhaps it will check whether the @sc{car} of the third
937 element is the symbol @code{*}! Using @code{function} tells the
938 compiler it is safe to go ahead and compile the constant function.
940 Nowadays it is possible to omit @code{function} entirely, like this:
944 (defun double-property (symbol prop)
945 (change-property symbol prop (lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
950 This is because @code{lambda} itself implies @code{function}.
952 We sometimes write @code{function} instead of @code{quote} when
953 quoting the name of a function, but this usage is just a sort of
957 (function @var{symbol}) @equiv{} (quote @var{symbol}) @equiv{} '@var{symbol}
960 @cindex @samp{#'} syntax
961 The read syntax @code{#'} is a short-hand for using @code{function}.
965 #'(lambda (x) (* x x))
972 (function (lambda (x) (* x x)))
975 @defspec function function-object
976 @cindex function quoting
977 This special form returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it.
978 In this, it is equivalent to @code{quote}. However, it serves as a
979 note to the Emacs Lisp compiler that @var{function-object} is intended
980 to be used only as a function, and therefore can safely be compiled.
981 Contrast this with @code{quote}, in @ref{Quoting}.
984 @xref{describe-symbols example}, for a realistic example using
985 @code{function} and an anonymous function.
988 @section Accessing Function Cell Contents
990 The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the
991 function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test,
992 and set the function cell of symbols.
994 See also the function @code{indirect-function}. @xref{Definition of
997 @defun symbol-function symbol
998 @kindex void-function
999 This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. If the
1000 symbol's function cell is void, a @code{void-function} error is
1003 This function does not check that the returned object is a legitimate
1008 (defun bar (n) (+ n 2))
1012 (symbol-function 'bar)
1013 @result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2))
1020 (symbol-function 'baz)
1026 @cindex void function cell
1027 If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say that
1028 that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the function
1029 cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call such a symbol
1030 as a function, it signals a @code{void-function} error.
1032 Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol
1033 @code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects,
1034 and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be
1035 (and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with
1036 @code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever.
1038 You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with
1039 @code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you
1040 can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}.
1042 @defun fboundp symbol
1043 This function returns @code{t} if the symbol has an object in its
1044 function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object
1045 is a legitimate function.
1048 @defun fmakunbound symbol
1049 This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a
1050 subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a
1051 @code{void-function} error. It returns @var{symbol}. (See also
1052 @code{makunbound}, in @ref{Void Variables}.)
1069 @error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo
1074 @defun fset symbol definition
1075 This function stores @var{definition} in the function cell of
1076 @var{symbol}. The result is @var{definition}. Normally
1077 @var{definition} should be a function or the name of a function, but
1078 this is not checked. The argument @var{symbol} is an ordinary evaluated
1081 There are three normal uses of this function:
1085 Copying one symbol's function definition to another---in other words,
1086 making an alternate name for a function. (If you think of this as the
1087 definition of the new name, you should use @code{defalias} instead of
1088 @code{fset}; see @ref{Definition of defalias}.)
1091 Giving a symbol a function definition that is not a list and therefore
1092 cannot be made with @code{defun}. For example, you can use @code{fset}
1093 to give a symbol @code{s1} a function definition which is another symbol
1094 @code{s2}; then @code{s1} serves as an alias for whatever definition
1095 @code{s2} presently has. (Once again use @code{defalias} instead of
1096 @code{fset} if you think of this as the definition of @code{s1}.)
1099 In constructs for defining or altering functions. If @code{defun}
1100 were not a primitive, it could be written in Lisp (as a macro) using
1104 Here are examples of these uses:
1108 ;; @r{Save @code{foo}'s definition in @code{old-foo}.}
1109 (fset 'old-foo (symbol-function 'foo))
1113 ;; @r{Make the symbol @code{car} the function definition of @code{xfirst}.}
1114 ;; @r{(Most likely, @code{defalias} would be better than @code{fset} here.)}
1123 (symbol-function 'xfirst)
1127 (symbol-function (symbol-function 'xfirst))
1128 @result{} #<subr car>
1132 ;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.}
1133 (fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k")
1138 ;; @r{Here is a function that alters other functions.}
1139 (defun copy-function-definition (new old)
1140 "Define NEW with the same function definition as OLD."
1141 (fset new (symbol-function old)))
1146 @code{fset} is sometimes used to save the old definition of a
1147 function before redefining it. That permits the new definition to
1148 invoke the old definition. But it is unmodular and unclean for a Lisp
1149 file to redefine a function defined elsewhere. If you want to modify
1150 a function defined by another package, it is cleaner to use
1151 @code{defadvice} (@pxref{Advising Functions}).
1153 @node Inline Functions
1154 @section Inline Functions
1155 @cindex inline functions
1158 You can define an @dfn{inline function} by using @code{defsubst} instead
1159 of @code{defun}. An inline function works just like an ordinary
1160 function except for one thing: when you compile a call to the function,
1161 the function's definition is open-coded into the caller.
1163 Making a function inline makes explicit calls run faster. But it also
1164 has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility; if you change
1165 the definition of the function, calls already inlined still use the old
1166 definition until you recompile them. Since the flexibility of
1167 redefining functions is an important feature of Emacs, you should not
1168 make a function inline unless its speed is really crucial.
1170 Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can increase
1171 the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since the speed
1172 advantage of inline functions is greatest for small functions, you
1173 generally should not make large functions inline.
1175 It's possible to define a macro to expand into the same code that an
1176 inline function would execute. (@xref{Macros}.) But the macro would be
1177 limited to direct use in expressions---a macro cannot be called with
1178 @code{apply}, @code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work to
1179 convert an ordinary function into a macro. To convert it into an inline
1180 function is very easy; simply replace @code{defun} with @code{defsubst}.
1181 Since each argument of an inline function is evaluated exactly once, you
1182 needn't worry about how many times the body uses the arguments, as you
1183 do for macros. (@xref{Argument Evaluation}.)
1185 Inline functions can be used and open-coded later on in the same file,
1186 following the definition, just like macros.
1188 @node Function Safety
1189 @section Determining whether a function is safe to call
1190 @cindex function safety
1191 @cindex safety of functions
1193 Some major modes such as SES call functions that are stored in user
1194 files. (@inforef{Top, ,ses}, for more information on SES.) User
1195 files sometimes have poor pedigrees---you can get a spreadsheet from
1196 someone you've just met, or you can get one through email from someone
1197 you've never met. So it is risky to call a function whose source code
1198 is stored in a user file until you have determined that it is safe.
1200 @defun unsafep form &optional unsafep-vars
1201 Returns @code{nil} if @var{form} is a @dfn{safe} Lisp expression, or
1202 returns a list that describes why it might be unsafe. The argument
1203 @var{unsafep-vars} is a list of symbols known to have temporary
1204 bindings at this point; it is mainly used for internal recursive
1205 calls. The current buffer is an implicit argument, which provides a
1206 list of buffer-local bindings.
1209 Being quick and simple, @code{unsafep} does a very light analysis and
1210 rejects many Lisp expressions that are actually safe. There are no
1211 known cases where @code{unsafep} returns @code{nil} for an unsafe
1212 expression. However, a ``safe'' Lisp expression can return a string
1213 with a @code{display} property, containing an associated Lisp
1214 expression to be executed after the string is inserted into a buffer.
1215 This associated expression can be a virus. In order to be safe, you
1216 must delete properties from all strings calculated by user code before
1217 inserting them into buffers.
1220 What is a safe Lisp expression? Basically, it's an expression that
1221 calls only built-in functions with no side effects (or only innocuous
1222 ones). Innocuous side effects include displaying messages and
1223 altering non-risky buffer-local variables (but not global variables).
1226 @item Safe expression
1229 An atom or quoted thing.
1231 A call to a safe function (see below), if all its arguments are
1234 One of the special forms @code{and}, @code{catch}, @code{cond},
1235 @code{if}, @code{or}, @code{prog1}, @code{prog2}, @code{progn},
1236 @code{while}, and @code{unwind-protect}], if all its arguments are
1239 A form that creates temporary bindings (@code{condition-case},
1240 @code{dolist}, @code{dotimes}, @code{lambda}, @code{let}, or
1241 @code{let*}), if all args are safe and the symbols to be bound are not
1242 explicitly risky (see @pxref{File Local Variables}).
1244 An assignment using @code{add-to-list}, @code{setq}, @code{push}, or
1245 @code{pop}, if all args are safe and the symbols to be assigned are
1246 not explicitly risky and they already have temporary or buffer-local
1249 One of [apply, mapc, mapcar, mapconcat] if the first argument is a
1250 safe explicit lambda and the other args are safe expressions.
1256 A lambda containing safe expressions.
1258 A symbol on the list @code{safe-functions}, so the user says it's safe.
1260 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{side-effect-free} property.
1262 A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{safe-function} property. Value t
1263 indicates a function that is safe but has innocuous side effects.
1264 Other values will someday indicate functions with classes of side
1265 effects that are not always safe.
1268 The @code{side-effect-free} and @code{safe-function} properties are
1269 provided for built-in functions and for low-level functions and macros
1270 defined in @file{subr.el}. You can assign these properties for the
1271 functions you write.
1275 @node Related Topics
1276 @section Other Topics Related to Functions
1278 Here is a table of several functions that do things related to
1279 function calling and function definitions. They are documented
1280 elsewhere, but we provide cross references here.
1284 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1289 @item call-interactively
1290 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1293 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1296 See @ref{Accessing Documentation}.
1302 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1305 See @ref{Anonymous Functions}.
1308 See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1310 @item indirect-function
1311 See @ref{Function Indirection}.
1314 See @ref{Using Interactive}.
1317 See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1320 See @ref{Creating Symbols}.
1323 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1325 @item map-char-table
1326 See @ref{Char-Tables}.
1329 See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1332 See @ref{Functions for Key Lookup}.
1336 arch-tag: 39100cdf-8a55-4898-acba-595db619e8e2