2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
5 @setfilename ../info/eval
6 @node Evaluation, Control Structures, Symbols, Top
11 @cindex value of expression
13 The @dfn{evaluation} of expressions in Emacs Lisp is performed by the
14 @dfn{Lisp interpreter}---a program that receives a Lisp object as input
15 and computes its @dfn{value as an expression}. How it does this depends
16 on the data type of the object, according to rules described in this
17 chapter. The interpreter runs automatically to evaluate portions of
18 your program, but can also be called explicitly via the Lisp primitive
23 * Intro Eval:: Evaluation in the scheme of things.
24 * Eval:: How to invoke the Lisp interpreter explicitly.
25 * Forms:: How various sorts of objects are evaluated.
26 * Quoting:: Avoiding evaluation (to put constants in the program).
30 @section Introduction to Evaluation
32 The Lisp interpreter, or evaluator, is the program which computes
33 the value of an expression which is given to it. When a function
34 written in Lisp is called, the evaluator computes the value of the
35 function by evaluating the expressions in the function body. Thus,
36 running any Lisp program really means running the Lisp interpreter.
38 How the evaluator handles an object depends primarily on the data
44 A Lisp object which is intended for evaluation is called an
45 @dfn{expression} or a @dfn{form}. The fact that expressions are data
46 objects and not merely text is one of the fundamental differences
47 between Lisp-like languages and typical programming languages. Any
48 object can be evaluated, but in practice only numbers, symbols, lists
49 and strings are evaluated very often.
51 It is very common to read a Lisp expression and then evaluate the
52 expression, but reading and evaluation are separate activities, and
53 either can be performed alone. Reading per se does not evaluate
54 anything; it converts the printed representation of a Lisp object to the
55 object itself. It is up to the caller of @code{read} whether this
56 object is a form to be evaluated, or serves some entirely different
57 purpose. @xref{Input Functions}.
59 Do not confuse evaluation with command key interpretation. The
60 editor command loop translates keyboard input into a command (an
61 interactively callable function) using the active keymaps, and then
62 uses @code{call-interactively} to invoke the command. The execution of
63 the command itself involves evaluation if the command is written in
64 Lisp, but that is not a part of command key interpretation itself.
67 @cindex recursive evaluation
68 Evaluation is a recursive process. That is, evaluation of a form may
69 call @code{eval} to evaluate parts of the form. For example, evaluation
70 of a function call first evaluates each argument of the function call,
71 and then evaluates each form in the function body. Consider evaluation
72 of the form @code{(car x)}: the subform @code{x} must first be evaluated
73 recursively, so that its value can be passed as an argument to the
77 The evaluation of forms takes place in a context called the
78 @dfn{environment}, which consists of the current values and bindings of
79 all Lisp variables.@footnote{This definition of ``environment'' is
80 specifically not intended to include all the data which can affect the
81 result of a program.} Whenever the form refers to a variable without
82 creating a new binding for it, the value of the binding in the current
83 environment is used. @xref{Variables}.
86 Evaluation of a form may create new environments for recursive
87 evaluation by binding variables (@pxref{Local Variables}). These
88 environments are temporary and vanish by the time evaluation of the form
89 is complete. The form may also make changes that persist; these changes
90 are called @dfn{side effects}. An example of a form that produces side
91 effects is @code{(setq foo 1)}.
93 Finally, evaluation of one particular function call, @code{byte-code},
94 invokes the @dfn{byte-code interpreter} on its arguments. Although the
95 byte-code interpreter is not the same as the Lisp interpreter, it uses
96 the same environment as the Lisp interpreter, and may on occasion invoke
97 the Lisp interpreter. (@xref{Byte Compilation}.)
99 The details of what evaluation means for each kind of form are
100 described below (@pxref{Forms}).
105 Most often, forms are evaluated automatically, by virtue of their
106 occurrence in a program being run. On rare occasions, you may need to
107 write code that evaluates a form that is computed at run time, such as
108 after reading a form from text being edited or getting one from a
109 property list. On these occasions, use the @code{eval} function.
111 The functions and variables described in this section evaluate
112 forms, specify limits to the evaluation process, or record recently
113 returned values. Loading a file also does evaluation
117 This is the basic function for performing evaluation. It evaluates
118 @var{form} in the current environment and returns the result. How the
119 evaluation proceeds depends on the type of the object (@pxref{Forms}).
121 Since @code{eval} is a function, the argument expression that appears
122 in a call to @code{eval} is evaluated twice: once as preparation before
123 @code{eval} is called, and again by the @code{eval} function itself.
134 ;; @r{@code{eval} receives argument @code{bar}, which is the value of @code{foo}}
140 The number of currently active calls to @code{eval} is limited to
141 @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} (see below).
144 @cindex evaluation of buffer contents
145 @deffn Command eval-current-buffer &optional stream
146 This function evaluates the forms in the current buffer. It reads
147 forms from the buffer and calls @code{eval} on them until the end of the
148 buffer is reached, or until an error is signaled and not handled.
150 If @var{stream} is supplied, the variable @code{standard-output} is
151 bound to @var{stream} during the evaluation (@pxref{Output
154 @code{eval-current-buffer} always returns @code{nil}.
157 @deffn Command eval-region start end &optional stream
158 This function evaluates the forms in the current buffer in the region
159 defined by the positions @var{start} and @var{end}. It reads forms from
160 the region and calls @code{eval} on them until the end of the region is
161 reached, or until an error is signaled and not handled.
163 If @var{stream} is supplied, @code{standard-output} is bound to it
164 for the duration of the command.
166 @code{eval-region} always returns @code{nil}.
169 @defvar max-lisp-eval-depth
170 This variable defines the maximum depth allowed in calls to @code{eval},
171 @code{apply}, and @code{funcall} before an error is signaled (with error
172 message @code{"Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-depth"}). This counts
173 calling the functions mentioned in Lisp expression, and recursive
174 evaluation of function call arguments and function body forms.
176 This limit, with the associated error when it is exceeded, is one way
177 that Lisp avoids infinite recursion on an ill-defined function.
178 @cindex Lisp nesting error
180 The default value of this variable is 200. If you set it to a value
181 less than 100, Lisp will reset it to 100 if the given value is reached.
183 @code{max-specpdl-size} provides another limit on nesting.
184 @xref{Local Variables}.
188 The value of this variable is a list of the values returned by all the
189 expressions which were read from buffers (including the minibuffer),
190 evaluated, and printed. The elements are ordered most recent first.
198 (list 'A (1+ 2) auto-save-default)
203 @result{} ((A 3 t) 1 @dots{})
207 This variable is useful for referring back to values of forms recently
208 evaluated. It is generally a bad idea to print the value of
209 @code{values} itself, since this may be very long. Instead, examine
210 particular elements, like this:
214 ;; @r{Refer to the most recent evaluation result.}
219 ;; @r{That put a new element on,}
220 ;; @r{so all elements move back one.}
225 ;; @r{This gets the element that was next-to-last}
226 ;; @r{before this example.}
234 @section Kinds of Forms
236 A Lisp object that is intended to be evaluated is called a @dfn{form}.
237 How Emacs evaluates a form depends on its data type. Emacs has three
238 different kinds of form that are evaluated differently: symbols, lists,
239 and ``all other types''. This section describes all three kinds,
240 starting with ``all other types'' which are self-evaluating forms.
243 * Self-Evaluating Forms:: Forms that evaluate to themselves.
244 * Symbol Forms:: Symbols evaluate as variables.
245 * Classifying Lists:: How to distinguish various sorts of list forms.
246 * Function Indirection:: When a symbol appears as the car of a list,
247 we find the real function via the symbol.
248 * Function Forms:: Forms that call functions.
249 * Macro Forms:: Forms that call macros.
250 * Special Forms:: ``Special forms'' are idiosyncratic primitives,
251 most of them extremely important.
252 * Autoloading:: Functions set up to load files
253 containing their real definitions.
256 @node Self-Evaluating Forms
257 @subsection Self-Evaluating Forms
258 @cindex vector evaluation
259 @cindex literal evaluation
260 @cindex self-evaluating form
262 A @dfn{self-evaluating form} is any form that is not a list or symbol.
263 Self-evaluating forms evaluate to themselves: the result of evaluation
264 is the same object that was evaluated. Thus, the number 25 evaluates to
265 25, and the string @code{"foo"} evaluates to the string @code{"foo"}.
266 Likewise, evaluation of a vector does not cause evaluation of the
267 elements of the vector---it returns the same vector with its contents
272 '123 ; @r{An object, shown without evaluation.}
276 123 ; @r{Evaluated as usual---result is the same.}
280 (eval '123) ; @r{Evaluated ``by hand''---result is the same.}
284 (eval (eval '123)) ; @r{Evaluating twice changes nothing.}
289 It is common to write numbers, characters, strings, and even vectors
290 in Lisp code, taking advantage of the fact that they self-evaluate.
291 However, it is quite unusual to do this for types that lack a read
292 syntax, because there's no way to write them textually; however, it is
293 possible to construct Lisp expressions containing these types by means
294 of a Lisp program. Here is an example:
298 ;; @r{Build an expression containing a buffer object.}
299 (setq buffer (list 'print (current-buffer)))
300 @result{} (print #<buffer eval.texi>)
305 @print{} #<buffer eval.texi>
306 @result{} #<buffer eval.texi>
311 @subsection Symbol Forms
312 @cindex symbol evaluation
314 When a symbol is evaluated, it is treated as a variable. The result
315 is the variable's value, if it has one. If it has none (if its value
316 cell is void), an error is signaled. For more information on the use of
317 variables, see @ref{Variables}.
319 In the following example, we set the value of a symbol with
320 @code{setq}. Then we evaluate the symbol, and get back the value that
338 The symbols @code{nil} and @code{t} are treated specially, so that the
339 value of @code{nil} is always @code{nil}, and the value of @code{t} is
340 always @code{t}. Thus, these two symbols act like self-evaluating
341 forms, even though @code{eval} treats them like any other symbol.
343 @node Classifying Lists
344 @subsection Classification of List Forms
345 @cindex list form evaluation
347 A form that is a nonempty list is either a function call, a macro
348 call, or a special form, according to its first element. These three
349 kinds of forms are evaluated in different ways, described below. The
350 remaining list elements constitute the @dfn{arguments} for the function,
351 macro, or special form.
353 The first step in evaluating a nonempty list is to examine its first
354 element. This element alone determines what kind of form the list is
355 and how the rest of the list is to be processed. The first element is
356 @emph{not} evaluated, as it would be in some Lisp dialects such as
359 @node Function Indirection
360 @subsection Symbol Function Indirection
361 @cindex symbol function indirection
363 @cindex void function
365 If the first element of the list is a symbol then evaluation examines
366 the symbol's function cell, and uses its contents instead of the
367 original symbol. If the contents are another symbol, this process,
368 called @dfn{symbol function indirection}, is repeated until it obtains a
369 non-symbol. @xref{Function Names}, for more information about using a
370 symbol as a name for a function stored in the function cell of the
373 One possible consequence of this process is an infinite loop, in the
374 event that a symbol's function cell refers to the same symbol. Or a
375 symbol may have a void function cell, in which case the subroutine
376 @code{symbol-function} signals a @code{void-function} error. But if
377 neither of these things happens, we eventually obtain a non-symbol,
378 which ought to be a function or other suitable object.
380 @kindex invalid-function
381 @cindex invalid function
382 More precisely, we should now have a Lisp function (a lambda
383 expression), a byte-code function, a primitive function, a Lisp macro, a
384 special form, or an autoload object. Each of these types is a case
385 described in one of the following sections. If the object is not one of
386 these types, the error @code{invalid-function} is signaled.
388 The following example illustrates the symbol indirection process. We
389 use @code{fset} to set the function cell of a symbol and
390 @code{symbol-function} to get the function cell contents
391 (@pxref{Function Cells}). Specifically, we store the symbol @code{car}
392 into the function cell of @code{first}, and the symbol @code{first} into
393 the function cell of @code{erste}.
397 ;; @r{Build this function cell linkage:}
398 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
399 ;; | #<subr car> | <-- | car | <-- | first | <-- | erste |
400 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
406 (symbol-function 'car)
407 @result{} #<subr car>
418 (erste '(1 2 3)) ; @r{Call the function referenced by @code{erste}.}
423 By contrast, the following example calls a function without any symbol
424 function indirection, because the first element is an anonymous Lisp
425 function, not a symbol.
429 ((lambda (arg) (erste arg))
436 After that function is called, its body is evaluated; this does
437 involve symbol function indirection when calling @code{erste}.
439 The built-in function @code{indirect-function} provides an easy way to
440 perform symbol function indirection explicitly.
443 @defun indirect-function function
444 This function returns the meaning of @var{function} as a function. If
445 @var{function} is a symbol, then it finds @var{function}'s function
446 definition and starts over with that value. If @var{function} is not a
447 symbol, then it returns @var{function} itself.
449 Here is how you could define @code{indirect-function} in Lisp:
452 (defun indirect-function (function)
453 (if (symbolp function)
454 (indirect-function (symbol-function function))
460 @subsection Evaluation of Function Forms
461 @cindex function form evaluation
462 @cindex function call
464 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a Lisp function
465 object, byte-code object or primitive function object, then that list is
466 a @dfn{function call}. For example, here is a call to the function
473 The first step ni evaluating a function call is to evaluate the
474 remaining elements of the list in the order they appear. The results
475 are the actual argument values, one value for each list element. The
476 next step is to call the function with this list of arguments,
477 effectively using the function @code{apply} (@pxref{Calling Functions}).
478 If the function is written in Lisp, the arguments are used to bind the
479 argument variables of the function (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}); then
480 the forms in the function body are evaluated in order, and the value of
481 the last body form becomes the value of the function call.
484 @subsection Lisp Macro Evaluation
485 @cindex macro call evaluation
487 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a macro object, then
488 the list is a @dfn{macro call}. When a macro call is evaluated, the
489 elements of the rest of the list are @emph{not} initially evaluated.
490 Instead, these elements themselves are used as the arguments of the
491 macro. The macro definition computes a replacement form, called the
492 @dfn{expansion} of the macro, to be evaluated in place of the original
493 form. The expansion may be any sort of form: a self-evaluating
494 constant, a symbol or a list. If the expansion is itself a macro call,
495 this process of expansion repeats until some other sort of form results.
497 Normally, the argument expressions are not evaluated as part of
498 computing the macro expansion, but instead appear as part of the
499 expansion, so they are evaluated when the expansion is evaluated.
501 For example, given a macro defined as follows:
506 (list 'car (list 'cdr x)))
511 an expression such as @code{(cadr (assq 'handler list))} is a macro
512 call, and its expansion is:
515 (car (cdr (assq 'handler list)))
519 Note that the argument @code{(assq 'handler list)} appears in the
522 @xref{Macros}, for a complete description of Emacs Lisp macros.
525 @subsection Special Forms
526 @cindex special form evaluation
528 A @dfn{special form} is a primitive function specially marked so that
529 its arguments are not all evaluated. Most special forms define control
530 structures or perform variable bindings---things which functions cannot
533 Each special form has its own rules for which arguments are evaluated
534 and which are used without evaluation. Whether a particular argument is
535 evaluated may depend on the results of evaluating other arguments.
537 Here is a list, in alphabetical order, of all of the special forms in
538 Emacs Lisp with a reference to where each is described.
542 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
545 @pxref{Catch and Throw}
551 @pxref{Handling Errors}
554 @pxref{Defining Variables}
557 @pxref{Defining Macros}
560 @pxref{Defining Functions}
563 @pxref{Defining Variables}
566 @pxref{Anonymous Functions}
572 @pxref{Interactive Call}
576 @pxref{Local Variables}
579 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
592 @item save-restriction
595 @item save-window-excursion
596 @pxref{Window Configurations}
599 @pxref{Setting Variables}
602 @pxref{Creating Buffer-Local}
605 @pxref{Mouse Tracking}
608 @pxref{Nonlocal Exits}
613 @item with-output-to-temp-buffer
614 @pxref{Temporary Displays}
617 @cindex CL note---special forms compared
619 @b{Common Lisp note:} here are some comparisons of special forms in
620 GNU Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp. @code{setq}, @code{if}, and
621 @code{catch} are special forms in both Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp.
622 @code{defun} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but a macro in Common
623 Lisp. @code{save-excursion} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but
624 doesn't exist in Common Lisp. @code{throw} is a special form in
625 Common Lisp (because it must be able to throw multiple values), but it
626 is a function in Emacs Lisp (which doesn't have multiple
631 @subsection Autoloading
633 The @dfn{autoload} feature allows you to call a function or macro
634 whose function definition has not yet been loaded into Emacs. It
635 specifies which file contains the definition. When an autoload object
636 appears as a symbol's function definition, calling that symbol as a
637 function automatically loads the specified file; then it calls the real
638 definition loaded from that file. @xref{Autoload}.
644 The special form @code{quote} returns its single argument
647 @defspec quote object
648 This special form returns @var{object}, without evaluating it. This
649 provides a way to include constant symbols and lists, which are not
650 self-evaluating objects, in a program. (It is not necessary to quote
651 self-evaluating objects such as numbers, strings, and vectors.)
653 @cindex @samp{'} for quoting
654 @cindex quoting using apostrophe
655 @cindex apostrophe for quoting
656 Because @code{quote} is used so often in programs, Lisp provides a
657 convenient read syntax for it. An apostrophe character (@samp{'})
658 followed by a Lisp object (in read syntax) expands to a list whose first
659 element is @code{quote}, and whose second element is the object. Thus,
660 the read syntax @code{'x} is an abbreviation for @code{(quote x)}.
662 Here are some examples of expressions that use @code{quote}:
679 @result{} (quote foo)
683 @result{} (quote foo)
687 @result{} [(quote foo)]
692 Other quoting constructs include @code{function} (@pxref{Anonymous
693 Functions}), which causes an anonymous lambda expression written in Lisp
694 to be compiled, and @code{`} (@pxref{Backquote}), which is used to quote
695 only part of a list, while computing and substituting other parts.