2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2001, 2002, 2003,
4 @c 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../../info/eval
7 @node Evaluation, Control Structures, Symbols, Top
12 @cindex value of expression
14 The @dfn{evaluation} of expressions in Emacs Lisp is performed by the
15 @dfn{Lisp interpreter}---a program that receives a Lisp object as input
16 and computes its @dfn{value as an expression}. How it does this depends
17 on the data type of the object, according to rules described in this
18 chapter. The interpreter runs automatically to evaluate portions of
19 your program, but can also be called explicitly via the Lisp primitive
24 * Intro Eval:: Evaluation in the scheme of things.
25 * Forms:: How various sorts of objects are evaluated.
26 * Quoting:: Avoiding evaluation (to put constants in the program).
27 * Eval:: How to invoke the Lisp interpreter explicitly.
31 @section Introduction to Evaluation
33 The Lisp interpreter, or evaluator, is the part of Emacs that
34 computes the value of an expression that is given to it. When a
35 function written in Lisp is called, the evaluator computes the value
36 of the function by evaluating the expressions in the function body.
37 Thus, running any Lisp program really means running the Lisp
43 A Lisp object that is intended for evaluation is called an
44 @dfn{expression} or a @dfn{form}. The fact that forms are data
45 objects and not merely text is one of the fundamental differences
46 between Lisp-like languages and typical programming languages. Any
47 object can be evaluated, but in practice only numbers, symbols, lists
48 and strings are evaluated very often.
50 In subsequent sections, we will describe the details of what
51 evaluation means for each kind of form.
53 It is very common to read a Lisp form and then evaluate the form,
54 but reading and evaluation are separate activities, and either can be
55 performed alone. Reading per se does not evaluate anything; it
56 converts the printed representation of a Lisp object to the object
57 itself. It is up to the caller of @code{read} to specify whether this
58 object is a form to be evaluated, or serves some entirely different
59 purpose. @xref{Input Functions}.
61 @cindex recursive evaluation
62 Evaluation is a recursive process, and evaluating a form often
63 involves evaluating parts within that form. For instance, when you
64 evaluate a @dfn{function call} form such as @code{(car x)}, Emacs
65 first evaluates the argument (the subform @code{x}). After evaluating
66 the argument, Emacs @dfn{executes} the function (@code{car}), and if
67 the function is written in Lisp, execution works by evaluating the
68 @dfn{body} of the function. (In this example, however, @code{car} is
69 not a Lisp function; it is a primitive function implemented in C.)
70 @xref{Functions}, for more information about functions and function
74 Evaluation takes place in a context called the @dfn{environment},
75 which consists of the current values and bindings of all Lisp
76 variables (@pxref{Variables}).@footnote{This definition of
77 ``environment'' is specifically not intended to include all the data
78 that can affect the result of a program.} Whenever a form refers to a
79 variable without creating a new binding for it, the variable evaluates
80 to the value given by the current environment. Evaluating a form may
81 create a new environment for recursive evaluation, by binding
82 variables (@pxref{Local Variables}). Such environments are temporary,
83 and vanish when the evaluation of the form is complete.
86 Evaluating a form may also make changes that persist; these changes
87 are called @dfn{side effects}. An example of a form that produces a
88 side effect is @code{(setq foo 1)}.
90 Do not confuse evaluation with command key interpretation. The
91 editor command loop translates keyboard input into a command (an
92 interactively callable function) using the active keymaps, and then
93 uses @code{call-interactively} to execute that command. Executing the
94 command usually involves evaluation, if the command is written in
95 Lisp; however, this step is not considered a part of command key
96 interpretation. @xref{Command Loop}.
99 @section Kinds of Forms
101 A Lisp object that is intended to be evaluated is called a @dfn{form}.
102 How Emacs evaluates a form depends on its data type. Emacs has three
103 different kinds of form that are evaluated differently: symbols, lists,
104 and ``all other types.'' This section describes all three kinds, one by
105 one, starting with the ``all other types'' which are self-evaluating
109 * Self-Evaluating Forms:: Forms that evaluate to themselves.
110 * Symbol Forms:: Symbols evaluate as variables.
111 * Classifying Lists:: How to distinguish various sorts of list forms.
112 * Function Indirection:: When a symbol appears as the car of a list,
113 we find the real function via the symbol.
114 * Function Forms:: Forms that call functions.
115 * Macro Forms:: Forms that call macros.
116 * Special Forms:: "Special forms" are idiosyncratic primitives,
117 most of them extremely important.
118 * Autoloading:: Functions set up to load files
119 containing their real definitions.
122 @node Self-Evaluating Forms
123 @subsection Self-Evaluating Forms
124 @cindex vector evaluation
125 @cindex literal evaluation
126 @cindex self-evaluating form
128 A @dfn{self-evaluating form} is any form that is not a list or
129 symbol. Self-evaluating forms evaluate to themselves: the result of
130 evaluation is the same object that was evaluated. Thus, the number 25
131 evaluates to 25, and the string @code{"foo"} evaluates to the string
132 @code{"foo"}. Likewise, evaluating a vector does not cause evaluation
133 of the elements of the vector---it returns the same vector with its
138 '123 ; @r{A number, shown without evaluation.}
142 123 ; @r{Evaluated as usual---result is the same.}
146 (eval '123) ; @r{Evaluated ``by hand''---result is the same.}
150 (eval (eval '123)) ; @r{Evaluating twice changes nothing.}
155 It is common to write numbers, characters, strings, and even vectors
156 in Lisp code, taking advantage of the fact that they self-evaluate.
157 However, it is quite unusual to do this for types that lack a read
158 syntax, because there's no way to write them textually. It is possible
159 to construct Lisp expressions containing these types by means of a Lisp
160 program. Here is an example:
164 ;; @r{Build an expression containing a buffer object.}
165 (setq print-exp (list 'print (current-buffer)))
166 @result{} (print #<buffer eval.texi>)
171 @print{} #<buffer eval.texi>
172 @result{} #<buffer eval.texi>
177 @subsection Symbol Forms
178 @cindex symbol evaluation
180 When a symbol is evaluated, it is treated as a variable. The result
181 is the variable's value, if it has one. If it has none (if its value
182 cell is void), an error is signaled. For more information on the use of
183 variables, see @ref{Variables}.
185 In the following example, we set the value of a symbol with
186 @code{setq}. Then we evaluate the symbol, and get back the value that
204 The symbols @code{nil} and @code{t} are treated specially, so that the
205 value of @code{nil} is always @code{nil}, and the value of @code{t} is
206 always @code{t}; you cannot set or bind them to any other values. Thus,
207 these two symbols act like self-evaluating forms, even though
208 @code{eval} treats them like any other symbol. A symbol whose name
209 starts with @samp{:} also self-evaluates in the same way; likewise,
210 its value ordinarily cannot be changed. @xref{Constant Variables}.
212 @node Classifying Lists
213 @subsection Classification of List Forms
214 @cindex list form evaluation
216 A form that is a nonempty list is either a function call, a macro
217 call, or a special form, according to its first element. These three
218 kinds of forms are evaluated in different ways, described below. The
219 remaining list elements constitute the @dfn{arguments} for the function,
220 macro, or special form.
222 The first step in evaluating a nonempty list is to examine its first
223 element. This element alone determines what kind of form the list is
224 and how the rest of the list is to be processed. The first element is
225 @emph{not} evaluated, as it would be in some Lisp dialects such as
228 @node Function Indirection
229 @subsection Symbol Function Indirection
230 @cindex symbol function indirection
231 @cindex indirection for functions
232 @cindex void function
234 If the first element of the list is a symbol then evaluation
235 examines the symbol's function cell, and uses its contents instead of
236 the original symbol. If the contents are another symbol, this
237 process, called @dfn{symbol function indirection}, is repeated until
238 it obtains a non-symbol. @xref{Function Names}, for more information
239 about symbol function indirection.
241 One possible consequence of this process is an infinite loop, in the
242 event that a symbol's function cell refers to the same symbol. Or a
243 symbol may have a void function cell, in which case the subroutine
244 @code{symbol-function} signals a @code{void-function} error. But if
245 neither of these things happens, we eventually obtain a non-symbol,
246 which ought to be a function or other suitable object.
248 @kindex invalid-function
249 More precisely, we should now have a Lisp function (a lambda
250 expression), a byte-code function, a primitive function, a Lisp macro,
251 a special form, or an autoload object. Each of these types is a case
252 described in one of the following sections. If the object is not one
253 of these types, Emacs signals an @code{invalid-function} error.
255 The following example illustrates the symbol indirection process. We
256 use @code{fset} to set the function cell of a symbol and
257 @code{symbol-function} to get the function cell contents
258 (@pxref{Function Cells}). Specifically, we store the symbol @code{car}
259 into the function cell of @code{first}, and the symbol @code{first} into
260 the function cell of @code{erste}.
264 ;; @r{Build this function cell linkage:}
265 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
266 ;; | #<subr car> | <-- | car | <-- | first | <-- | erste |
267 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
273 (symbol-function 'car)
274 @result{} #<subr car>
285 (erste '(1 2 3)) ; @r{Call the function referenced by @code{erste}.}
290 By contrast, the following example calls a function without any symbol
291 function indirection, because the first element is an anonymous Lisp
292 function, not a symbol.
296 ((lambda (arg) (erste arg))
303 Executing the function itself evaluates its body; this does involve
304 symbol function indirection when calling @code{erste}.
306 The built-in function @code{indirect-function} provides an easy way to
307 perform symbol function indirection explicitly.
310 @defun indirect-function function &optional noerror
311 @anchor{Definition of indirect-function}
312 This function returns the meaning of @var{function} as a function. If
313 @var{function} is a symbol, then it finds @var{function}'s function
314 definition and starts over with that value. If @var{function} is not a
315 symbol, then it returns @var{function} itself.
317 This function signals a @code{void-function} error if the final symbol
318 is unbound and optional argument @var{noerror} is @code{nil} or
319 omitted. Otherwise, if @var{noerror} is non-@code{nil}, it returns
320 @code{nil} if the final symbol is unbound.
322 It signals a @code{cyclic-function-indirection} error if there is a
323 loop in the chain of symbols.
325 Here is how you could define @code{indirect-function} in Lisp:
328 (defun indirect-function (function)
329 (if (symbolp function)
330 (indirect-function (symbol-function function))
336 @subsection Evaluation of Function Forms
337 @cindex function form evaluation
338 @cindex function call
340 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a Lisp function
341 object, byte-code object or primitive function object, then that list is
342 a @dfn{function call}. For example, here is a call to the function
349 The first step in evaluating a function call is to evaluate the
350 remaining elements of the list from left to right. The results are the
351 actual argument values, one value for each list element. The next step
352 is to call the function with this list of arguments, effectively using
353 the function @code{apply} (@pxref{Calling Functions}). If the function
354 is written in Lisp, the arguments are used to bind the argument
355 variables of the function (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}); then the forms
356 in the function body are evaluated in order, and the value of the last
357 body form becomes the value of the function call.
360 @subsection Lisp Macro Evaluation
361 @cindex macro call evaluation
363 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a macro object, then
364 the list is a @dfn{macro call}. When a macro call is evaluated, the
365 elements of the rest of the list are @emph{not} initially evaluated.
366 Instead, these elements themselves are used as the arguments of the
367 macro. The macro definition computes a replacement form, called the
368 @dfn{expansion} of the macro, to be evaluated in place of the original
369 form. The expansion may be any sort of form: a self-evaluating
370 constant, a symbol, or a list. If the expansion is itself a macro call,
371 this process of expansion repeats until some other sort of form results.
373 Ordinary evaluation of a macro call finishes by evaluating the
374 expansion. However, the macro expansion is not necessarily evaluated
375 right away, or at all, because other programs also expand macro calls,
376 and they may or may not evaluate the expansions.
378 Normally, the argument expressions are not evaluated as part of
379 computing the macro expansion, but instead appear as part of the
380 expansion, so they are computed when the expansion is evaluated.
382 For example, given a macro defined as follows:
387 (list 'car (list 'cdr x)))
392 an expression such as @code{(cadr (assq 'handler list))} is a macro
393 call, and its expansion is:
396 (car (cdr (assq 'handler list)))
400 Note that the argument @code{(assq 'handler list)} appears in the
403 @xref{Macros}, for a complete description of Emacs Lisp macros.
406 @subsection Special Forms
407 @cindex special forms
408 @cindex evaluation of special forms
410 A @dfn{special form} is a primitive function specially marked so that
411 its arguments are not all evaluated. Most special forms define control
412 structures or perform variable bindings---things which functions cannot
415 Each special form has its own rules for which arguments are evaluated
416 and which are used without evaluation. Whether a particular argument is
417 evaluated may depend on the results of evaluating other arguments.
419 Here is a list, in alphabetical order, of all of the special forms in
420 Emacs Lisp with a reference to where each is described.
424 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
427 @pxref{Catch and Throw}
433 @pxref{Handling Errors}
436 @pxref{Defining Variables}
439 @pxref{Defining Macros}
442 @pxref{Defining Functions}
445 @pxref{Defining Variables}
448 @pxref{Anonymous Functions}
454 @pxref{Interactive Call}
458 @pxref{Local Variables}
461 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
471 @item save-current-buffer
472 @pxref{Current Buffer}
477 @item save-restriction
480 @item save-window-excursion
481 @pxref{Window Configurations}
484 @pxref{Setting Variables}
487 @pxref{Creating Buffer-Local}
490 @pxref{Mouse Tracking}
493 @pxref{Nonlocal Exits}
498 @item with-output-to-temp-buffer
499 @pxref{Temporary Displays}
502 @cindex CL note---special forms compared
504 @b{Common Lisp note:} Here are some comparisons of special forms in
505 GNU Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp. @code{setq}, @code{if}, and
506 @code{catch} are special forms in both Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp.
507 @code{defun} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but a macro in Common
508 Lisp. @code{save-excursion} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but
509 doesn't exist in Common Lisp. @code{throw} is a special form in
510 Common Lisp (because it must be able to throw multiple values), but it
511 is a function in Emacs Lisp (which doesn't have multiple
516 @subsection Autoloading
518 The @dfn{autoload} feature allows you to call a function or macro
519 whose function definition has not yet been loaded into Emacs. It
520 specifies which file contains the definition. When an autoload object
521 appears as a symbol's function definition, calling that symbol as a
522 function automatically loads the specified file; then it calls the real
523 definition loaded from that file. @xref{Autoload}.
528 The special form @code{quote} returns its single argument, as written,
529 without evaluating it. This provides a way to include constant symbols
530 and lists, which are not self-evaluating objects, in a program. (It is
531 not necessary to quote self-evaluating objects such as numbers, strings,
534 @defspec quote object
535 This special form returns @var{object}, without evaluating it.
538 @cindex @samp{'} for quoting
539 @cindex quoting using apostrophe
540 @cindex apostrophe for quoting
541 Because @code{quote} is used so often in programs, Lisp provides a
542 convenient read syntax for it. An apostrophe character (@samp{'})
543 followed by a Lisp object (in read syntax) expands to a list whose first
544 element is @code{quote}, and whose second element is the object. Thus,
545 the read syntax @code{'x} is an abbreviation for @code{(quote x)}.
547 Here are some examples of expressions that use @code{quote}:
564 @result{} (quote foo)
568 @result{} (quote foo)
572 @result{} [(quote foo)]
576 Other quoting constructs include @code{function} (@pxref{Anonymous
577 Functions}), which causes an anonymous lambda expression written in Lisp
578 to be compiled, and @samp{`} (@pxref{Backquote}), which is used to quote
579 only part of a list, while computing and substituting other parts.
584 Most often, forms are evaluated automatically, by virtue of their
585 occurrence in a program being run. On rare occasions, you may need to
586 write code that evaluates a form that is computed at run time, such as
587 after reading a form from text being edited or getting one from a
588 property list. On these occasions, use the @code{eval} function.
590 The functions and variables described in this section evaluate forms,
591 specify limits to the evaluation process, or record recently returned
592 values. Loading a file also does evaluation (@pxref{Loading}).
594 It is generally cleaner and more flexible to store a function in a
595 data structure, and call it with @code{funcall} or @code{apply}, than
596 to store an expression in the data structure and evaluate it. Using
597 functions provides the ability to pass information to them as
601 This is the basic function evaluating an expression. It evaluates
602 @var{form} in the current environment and returns the result. How the
603 evaluation proceeds depends on the type of the object (@pxref{Forms}).
605 Since @code{eval} is a function, the argument expression that appears
606 in a call to @code{eval} is evaluated twice: once as preparation before
607 @code{eval} is called, and again by the @code{eval} function itself.
618 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{foo}}
621 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{bar}, which is the value of @code{foo}}
627 The number of currently active calls to @code{eval} is limited to
628 @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} (see below).
631 @deffn Command eval-region start end &optional stream read-function
632 @anchor{Definition of eval-region}
633 This function evaluates the forms in the current buffer in the region
634 defined by the positions @var{start} and @var{end}. It reads forms from
635 the region and calls @code{eval} on them until the end of the region is
636 reached, or until an error is signaled and not handled.
638 By default, @code{eval-region} does not produce any output. However,
639 if @var{stream} is non-@code{nil}, any output produced by output
640 functions (@pxref{Output Functions}), as well as the values that
641 result from evaluating the expressions in the region are printed using
642 @var{stream}. @xref{Output Streams}.
644 If @var{read-function} is non-@code{nil}, it should be a function,
645 which is used instead of @code{read} to read expressions one by one.
646 This function is called with one argument, the stream for reading
647 input. You can also use the variable @code{load-read-function}
648 (@pxref{Definition of load-read-function,, How Programs Do Loading})
649 to specify this function, but it is more robust to use the
650 @var{read-function} argument.
652 @code{eval-region} does not move point. It always returns @code{nil}.
655 @cindex evaluation of buffer contents
656 @deffn Command eval-buffer &optional buffer-or-name stream filename unibyte print
657 This is similar to @code{eval-region}, but the arguments provide
658 different optional features. @code{eval-buffer} operates on the
659 entire accessible portion of buffer @var{buffer-or-name}.
660 @var{buffer-or-name} can be a buffer, a buffer name (a string), or
661 @code{nil} (or omitted), which means to use the current buffer.
662 @var{stream} is used as in @code{eval-region}, unless @var{stream} is
663 @code{nil} and @var{print} non-@code{nil}. In that case, values that
664 result from evaluating the expressions are still discarded, but the
665 output of the output functions is printed in the echo area.
666 @var{filename} is the file name to use for @code{load-history}
667 (@pxref{Unloading}), and defaults to @code{buffer-file-name}
668 (@pxref{Buffer File Name}). If @var{unibyte} is non-@code{nil},
669 @code{read} converts strings to unibyte whenever possible.
671 @findex eval-current-buffer
672 @code{eval-current-buffer} is an alias for this command.
675 @defopt max-lisp-eval-depth
676 @anchor{Definition of max-lisp-eval-depth}
677 This variable defines the maximum depth allowed in calls to @code{eval},
678 @code{apply}, and @code{funcall} before an error is signaled (with error
679 message @code{"Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-depth"}).
681 This limit, with the associated error when it is exceeded, is one way
682 Emacs Lisp avoids infinite recursion on an ill-defined function. If
683 you increase the value of @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} too much, such
684 code can cause stack overflow instead.
685 @cindex Lisp nesting error
687 The depth limit counts internal uses of @code{eval}, @code{apply}, and
688 @code{funcall}, such as for calling the functions mentioned in Lisp
689 expressions, and recursive evaluation of function call arguments and
690 function body forms, as well as explicit calls in Lisp code.
692 The default value of this variable is 400. If you set it to a value
693 less than 100, Lisp will reset it to 100 if the given value is
694 reached. Entry to the Lisp debugger increases the value, if there is
695 little room left, to make sure the debugger itself has room to
698 @code{max-specpdl-size} provides another limit on nesting.
699 @xref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local Variables}.
703 The value of this variable is a list of the values returned by all the
704 expressions that were read, evaluated, and printed from buffers
705 (including the minibuffer) by the standard Emacs commands which do
706 this. (Note that this does @emph{not} include evaluation in
707 @samp{*ielm*} buffers, nor evaluation using @kbd{C-j} in
708 @code{lisp-interaction-mode}.) The elements are ordered most recent
717 (list 'A (1+ 2) auto-save-default)
722 @result{} ((A 3 t) 1 @dots{})
726 This variable is useful for referring back to values of forms recently
727 evaluated. It is generally a bad idea to print the value of
728 @code{values} itself, since this may be very long. Instead, examine
729 particular elements, like this:
733 ;; @r{Refer to the most recent evaluation result.}
738 ;; @r{That put a new element on,}
739 ;; @r{so all elements move back one.}
744 ;; @r{This gets the element that was next-to-most-recent}
745 ;; @r{before this example.}
753 arch-tag: f723a4e0-31b3-453f-8afc-0bf8fd276d57