2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002,
4 @c 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../../info/control
7 @node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top
8 @chapter Control Structures
9 @cindex special forms for control structures
10 @cindex control structures
12 A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}).
13 We control the order of execution of these forms by enclosing them in
14 @dfn{control structures}. Control structures are special forms which
15 control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they
18 The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form
19 @var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you
20 write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
21 level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order
22 written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function
23 body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the
24 function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of
25 evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function.
27 Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other
30 Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including
31 other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled)
32 jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are
33 special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not
34 evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control
35 structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).
38 * Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order.
39 * Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}.
40 * Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
41 * Iteration:: @code{while} loops.
42 * Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence.
48 Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way
49 control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a
50 function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a
51 control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest
52 control construct of Lisp.
54 A @code{progn} special form looks like this:
58 (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
63 and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in
64 that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form.
65 The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
66 @code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}.
68 @cindex implicit @code{progn}
69 In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute
70 two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.
71 But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the
72 body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So
73 the body of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'':
74 several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.
75 Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.
76 As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago.
77 It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and},
78 @code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}.
80 @defspec progn forms@dots{}
81 This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
82 order, returning the result of the final form.
86 (progn (print "The first form")
87 (print "The second form")
88 (print "The third form"))
89 @print{} "The first form"
90 @print{} "The second form"
91 @print{} "The third form"
92 @result{} "The third form"
97 Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
100 @defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
101 This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
102 textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.
106 (prog1 (print "The first form")
107 (print "The second form")
108 (print "The third form"))
109 @print{} "The first form"
110 @print{} "The second form"
111 @print{} "The third form"
112 @result{} "The first form"
116 Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
117 @code{x}, then return the value of that former element:
120 (prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
124 @defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
125 This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
126 following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
131 (prog2 (print "The first form")
132 (print "The second form")
133 (print "The third form"))
134 @print{} "The first form"
135 @print{} "The second form"
136 @print{} "The third form"
137 @result{} "The second form"
143 @section Conditionals
144 @cindex conditional evaluation
146 Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp
147 has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in
148 other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of
149 @code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.
151 @defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
152 @code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
153 based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is
154 non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
155 Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
156 value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
157 an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.)
159 If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
160 given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.
162 @code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is
163 never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in the example below,
164 @code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called.
176 @defmac when condition then-forms@dots{}
177 This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms},
178 and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular,
181 (when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
185 is entirely equivalent to
188 (if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil)
192 @defmac unless condition forms@dots{}
193 This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}:
196 (unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
200 is entirely equivalent to
203 (if @var{condition} nil
204 @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
208 @defspec cond clause@dots{}
209 @code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each
210 @var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this
211 list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
212 @var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this:
215 (@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
218 @code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
219 @var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is
220 non-@code{nil}, the clause ``succeeds''; then @code{cond} evaluates its
221 @var{body-forms}, and the value of the last of @var{body-forms} becomes
222 the value of the @code{cond}. The remaining clauses are ignored.
224 If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails,'' so
225 the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its
228 If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
229 fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.
231 A clause may also look like this:
238 Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of
239 @var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form.
241 The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
242 the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
247 (cond ((numberp x) x)
250 (setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
251 (buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause}
252 ((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
256 Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous
257 clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the
258 @var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
259 @var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is
260 never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond}
268 (cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo)
275 This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a}
276 is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
279 Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with
280 @code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style.
285 (if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
287 (cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
291 @node Combining Conditions
292 @section Constructs for Combining Conditions
294 This section describes three constructs that are often used together
295 with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The
296 constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
297 kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
300 This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
301 @code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
302 The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
303 using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
306 @defspec and conditions@dots{}
307 The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
308 true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
311 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
312 of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
313 @var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring
314 the remaining @var{conditions}.
316 If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
317 the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just
318 @code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate
319 because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think
320 about it; which one did not?)
322 Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
323 not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
324 which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
325 remaining condition is never evaluated.
329 (and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
336 Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:
340 (if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
341 (message "foo is a list starting with x"))
346 Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
347 @code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.
349 @code{and} expressions can also be written using either @code{if} or
350 @code{cond}. Here's how:
354 (and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
356 (if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
358 (cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
363 @defspec or conditions@dots{}
364 The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
365 @var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the
366 @var{conditions} one by one in the order written.
368 If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
369 the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns
370 right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it
371 returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated.
373 If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
374 expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no
375 @var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the
376 @var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one
379 For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either
380 @code{nil} or the integer zero:
383 (or (eq x nil) (eq x 0))
386 Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
387 @code{cond}. For example:
391 (or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
399 You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:
403 (if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
404 (if @var{arg2} @var{arg2}
410 This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
411 @var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
412 @var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
420 Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For
421 example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element
422 of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this
423 in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}:
425 @defspec while condition forms@dots{}
426 @code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is
427 non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it
428 reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
429 evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition}
430 evaluates to @code{nil}.
432 There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop
433 will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
434 until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).
436 The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.
445 (princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
447 @print{} Iteration 0.
448 @print{} Iteration 1.
449 @print{} Iteration 2.
450 @print{} Iteration 3.
455 To write a ``repeat...until'' loop, which will execute something on each
456 iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the
457 end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as
464 (not (looking-at "^$"))))
469 This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it
470 reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no
471 body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point).
474 The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to
475 write two common kinds of loops.
477 @defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{}
478 This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of
479 @var{list}, binding the variable @var{var} locally to hold the current
480 element. Then it returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or
481 @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you
482 could use @code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function:
485 (defun reverse (list)
487 (dolist (elt list value)
488 (setq value (cons elt value)))))
492 @defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{}
493 This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0
494 (inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), binding the variable @var{var}
495 to the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value
496 of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted.
497 Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} to do something 100 times:
501 (insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n"))
506 @section Nonlocal Exits
507 @cindex nonlocal exits
509 A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
510 program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
511 as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
512 Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
516 * Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
517 * Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
518 * Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled.
519 * Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
522 @node Catch and Throw
523 @subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}
525 Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
526 construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
527 rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
528 request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
529 only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
530 that @code{catch}. For example:
547 The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to
548 the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code
549 following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of
550 @code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}.
552 The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the
553 first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is
554 @code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more
555 than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.
556 Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and
557 the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that
558 @code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching
559 @code{catch} in between).
561 Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching
562 @code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such as
563 @code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings are
564 unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally
565 (@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer
566 and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and
567 the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window
568 selection saved by @code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window
569 Configurations}). It also runs any cleanups established with the
570 @code{unwind-protect} special form when it exits that form
573 The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
574 that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function
575 called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place
576 chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
577 before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why
578 @code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
579 that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).
581 @cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
583 @b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
584 have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
585 @code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only
589 @defspec catch tag body@dots{}
590 @cindex tag on run time stack
591 @code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.
592 The return point is distinguished from other such return points by
593 @var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument
594 @var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established.
596 With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the
597 @var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without
598 error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from
601 If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body},
602 specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits
603 immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the
604 second argument of @code{throw}.
607 @defun throw tag value
608 The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
609 established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
610 among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
611 specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag},
612 the innermost one is used.
614 The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
618 If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
619 error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
622 @node Examples of Catch
623 @subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}
625 One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
626 nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to.'')
627 Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
639 (throw 'loop (list i j)))
646 If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
647 list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
648 @code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
649 is the result of the @code{while}.
651 Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
652 return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag,
665 (print (catch2 'hack))
673 Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
674 the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore,
675 @code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
676 printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
677 @code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.
679 Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:
684 (print (catch2 'quux))
691 We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has
692 the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.
693 Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value
694 @code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the
695 body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated.
701 When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
702 cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.
704 When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an
705 error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is
706 the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
707 the end of the buffer.
709 In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
710 For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
711 structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before
712 the program is finished. In such cases, you would use
713 @code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
714 evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may
715 wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.
716 In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish
717 @dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error.
719 Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
720 one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}
721 instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}.
724 * Signaling Errors:: How to report an error.
725 * Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error.
726 * Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution.
727 * Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them.
730 @node Signaling Errors
731 @subsubsection How to Signal an Error
732 @cindex signaling errors
734 @dfn{Signaling} an error means beginning error processing. Error
735 processing normally aborts all or part of the running program and
736 returns to a point that is set up to handle the error
737 (@pxref{Processing of Errors}). Here we describe how to signal an
740 Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives
741 which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
742 @sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
743 buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
744 @code{error} and @code{signal}.
746 Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not
747 considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error.
750 Every error specifies an error message, one way or another. The
751 message should state what is wrong (``File does not exist''), not how
752 things ought to be (``File must exist''). The convention in Emacs
753 Lisp is that error messages should start with a capital letter, but
754 should not end with any sort of punctuation.
756 @defun error format-string &rest args
757 This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
758 applying @code{format} (@pxref{Formatting Strings}) to
759 @var{format-string} and @var{args}.
761 These examples show typical uses of @code{error}:
765 (error "That is an error -- try something else")
766 @error{} That is an error -- try something else
770 (error "You have committed %d errors" 10)
771 @error{} You have committed 10 errors
775 @code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
776 error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
779 @strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message
780 verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string}
781 contains @samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with
782 undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}.
785 @defun signal error-symbol data
786 @anchor{Definition of signal}
787 This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The
788 argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to
789 the circumstances of the error.
791 The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
792 bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of
793 condition names. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different sorts of
794 errors. @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols,
795 error conditions and condition names.
797 If the error is not handled, the two arguments are used in printing
798 the error message. Normally, this error message is provided by the
799 @code{error-message} property of @var{error-symbol}. If @var{data} is
800 non-@code{nil}, this is followed by a colon and a comma separated list
801 of the unevaluated elements of @var{data}. For @code{error}, the
802 error message is the @sc{car} of @var{data} (that must be a string).
803 Subcategories of @code{file-error} are handled specially.
805 The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
806 @var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error,
807 there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type
808 that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type.
810 Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
811 handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local
812 variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
813 @var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}).
815 The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions
816 it could sometimes return).
820 (signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
821 @error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
825 (signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition"))
826 @error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition"
831 @cindex CL note---no continuable errors
833 @b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
834 concept of continuable errors.
837 @node Processing of Errors
838 @subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors
840 When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active
841 @dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp
842 expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the
843 Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is
844 executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler
845 executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that
846 established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case}
847 have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them.
849 If there is no applicable handler for the error, it terminates the
850 current command and returns control to the editor command loop. (The
851 command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors.) The
852 command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to
853 print an error message. You can use the variable
854 @code{command-error-function} to control how this is done:
856 @defvar command-error-function
857 This variable, if non-@code{nil}, specifies a function to use to
858 handle errors that return control to the Emacs command loop. The
859 function should take three arguments: @var{data}, a list of the same
860 form that @code{condition-case} would bind to its variable;
861 @var{context}, a string describing the situation in which the error
862 occurred, or (more often) @code{nil}; and @var{caller}, the Lisp
863 function which called the primitive that signaled the error.
866 @cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
867 An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The
868 debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error
869 Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs
870 in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of
871 variables precisely as they were at the time of the error.
873 @node Handling Errors
874 @subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
875 @cindex error handler
876 @cindex handling errors
878 The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command
879 that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop.
880 You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
881 establishing an error handler, with the special form
882 @code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this:
887 (delete-file filename)
893 This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
894 returning @code{nil} if an error occurs.
896 The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that
897 are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
898 @code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are
899 totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
902 The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
903 @dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a
904 call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when
905 this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
906 They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they
907 are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in
908 their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly
909 speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
910 @code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
911 protected form itself.
913 The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler
914 lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
915 which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error
916 is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies
917 to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example
918 above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
919 @code{error}, which covers all errors.
921 The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
922 starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested
923 @code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of
924 the two gets to handle it.
926 If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this
927 ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if
928 @code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger.
930 If you want to be able to debug errors that are caught by a
931 @code{condition-case}, set the variable @code{debug-on-signal} to a
932 non-@code{nil} value. You can also specify that a particular handler
933 should let the debugger run first, by writing @code{debug} among the
934 conditions, like this:
939 (delete-file filename)
945 The effect of @code{debug} here is only to prevent
946 @code{condition-case} from suppressing the call to the debugger. Any
947 given error will invoke the debugger only if @code{debug-on-error} and
948 the other usual filtering mechanisms say it should. @xref{Error Debugging}.
950 Once Emacs decides that a certain handler handles the error, it
951 returns control to that handler. To do so, Emacs unbinds all variable
952 bindings made by binding constructs that are being exited, and
953 executes the cleanups of all @code{unwind-protect} forms that are
954 being exited. Once control arrives at the handler, the body of the
955 handler executes normally.
957 After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the
958 @code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited
959 completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume
960 execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
961 bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is
962 clean up and proceed.
964 Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
965 @code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate
966 facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a
967 @code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using
968 @code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error
969 that can be handled).
971 @defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
972 This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
973 the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes
974 without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
975 @code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
976 no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
977 error occurs during @var{protected-form}.
979 Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
980 @var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name
981 to be handled, or a list of condition names (which can include @code{debug}
982 to allow the debugger to run before the handler); @var{body} is one or more
983 Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.
984 Here are examples of handlers:
990 (arith-error (message "Division by zero"))
992 ((arith-error file-error)
994 "Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
998 Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what
999 kind of error it is. The @code{error-conditions} property of this
1000 symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs
1001 searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that
1002 specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching
1003 @code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this
1004 @code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error.
1006 After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case}
1007 returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body
1008 as the overall value.
1010 @cindex error description
1011 The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not
1012 bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
1013 handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an
1014 @dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the
1015 error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol}
1016 . @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to
1017 do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file
1018 name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the
1021 If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the
1022 error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler.
1025 @defun error-message-string error-description
1026 This function returns the error message string for a given error
1027 descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the
1028 usual error message for that error. @xref{Definition of signal}.
1031 @cindex @code{arith-error} example
1032 Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
1033 that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error
1034 message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number.
1038 (defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
1040 ;; @r{Protected form.}
1041 (/ dividend divisor)
1045 (arith-error ; @r{Condition.}
1046 ;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.}
1047 (message "%s" (error-message-string err))
1049 @result{} safe-divide
1054 @print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
1060 The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}. Thus,
1065 @error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
1069 Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
1070 including those signaled with @code{error}:
1082 ;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
1083 (error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz))
1084 ;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
1085 (error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err))
1087 @print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35")
1093 @subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
1094 @cindex error symbol
1096 @cindex condition name
1097 @cindex user-defined error
1098 @kindex error-conditions
1100 When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
1101 the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one
1102 error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of
1103 errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language.
1105 These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
1106 classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
1107 names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
1108 themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also
1109 condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
1110 @code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors (but not @code{quit}).
1111 Thus, each error has one or more condition names: @code{error}, the
1112 error symbol if that is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some
1113 intermediate classifications.
1115 In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must have an
1116 @code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names.
1117 This list defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to.
1118 (The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be
1119 members of this list.) Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is
1120 defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols.
1121 Because quitting is not considered an error, the value of the
1122 @code{error-conditions} property of @code{quit} is just @code{(quit)}.
1124 @cindex peculiar error
1125 In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol
1126 should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to
1127 be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If the
1128 error symbol has no @code{error-message} property or if the
1129 @code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error
1130 message @samp{peculiar error} is used. @xref{Definition of signal}.
1132 Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:
1138 '(error my-own-errors new-error))
1139 @result{} (error my-own-errors new-error)
1142 (put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error")
1143 @result{} "A new error"
1148 This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
1149 classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
1150 classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
1152 The error string should start with a capital letter but it should
1153 not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs.
1155 Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only
1156 an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Definition of signal}) in
1157 your code can do this:
1161 (signal 'new-error '(x y))
1162 @error{} A new error: x, y
1166 This error can be handled through any of the three condition names.
1167 This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
1168 @code{my-own-errors}:
1174 (my-own-errors nil))
1178 The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
1179 names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol
1180 serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
1181 and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give
1182 @code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol.
1184 By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
1185 seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names
1186 make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
1187 when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would
1188 eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.
1190 @xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols
1191 and their conditions.
1194 @subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits
1196 The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
1197 temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
1198 you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or
1199 throw. (Another more specific cleanup construct that is used only for
1200 changes in buffer contents is the atomic change group; @ref{Atomic
1203 @defspec unwind-protect body-form cleanup-forms@dots{}
1204 @cindex cleanup forms
1205 @cindex protected forms
1206 @cindex error cleanup
1208 @code{unwind-protect} executes @var{body-form} with a guarantee that
1209 the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves
1210 @var{body-form}, no matter how that happens. @var{body-form} may
1211 complete normally, or execute a @code{throw} out of the
1212 @code{unwind-protect}, or cause an error; in all cases, the
1213 @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.
1215 If @var{body-form} finishes normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns the
1216 value of @var{body-form}, after it evaluates the @var{cleanup-forms}.
1217 If @var{body-form} does not finish, @code{unwind-protect} does not
1218 return any value in the normal sense.
1220 Only @var{body-form} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any
1221 of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a
1222 @code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not}
1223 guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the
1224 @var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect
1225 it with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.
1227 The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
1228 together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
1229 @code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local
1233 For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
1234 make sure to kill it before finishing:
1239 (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
1243 (kill-buffer buffer))))
1248 You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
1249 (current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
1250 However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body-form} happens to
1251 get an error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively,
1252 you could write another @code{save-excursion} around @var{body-form},
1253 to ensure that the temporary buffer becomes current again in time to
1256 Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which
1257 expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Definition of
1258 with-temp-buffer,, Current Buffer}). Several of the macros defined in
1259 this manual use @code{unwind-protect} in this way.
1262 Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a
1263 process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
1264 machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
1265 numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it
1266 is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the
1267 event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless
1275 (setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
1276 (if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
1277 (message "Logged in")
1278 (error "Ftp login failed")))
1279 (or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
1283 This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
1284 quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
1285 @code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
1286 set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug,
1287 but at least it is very unlikely.
1290 arch-tag: 8abc30d4-4d3a-47f9-b908-e9e971c18c6d