2 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
3 @c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2002, 2003, 2004,
4 @c 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6 @setfilename ../info/eval
7 @node Evaluation, Control Structures, Symbols, Top
12 @cindex value of expression
14 The @dfn{evaluation} of expressions in Emacs Lisp is performed by the
15 @dfn{Lisp interpreter}---a program that receives a Lisp object as input
16 and computes its @dfn{value as an expression}. How it does this depends
17 on the data type of the object, according to rules described in this
18 chapter. The interpreter runs automatically to evaluate portions of
19 your program, but can also be called explicitly via the Lisp primitive
24 * Intro Eval:: Evaluation in the scheme of things.
25 * Forms:: How various sorts of objects are evaluated.
26 * Quoting:: Avoiding evaluation (to put constants in the program).
27 * Eval:: How to invoke the Lisp interpreter explicitly.
31 @section Introduction to Evaluation
33 The Lisp interpreter, or evaluator, is the program that computes
34 the value of an expression that is given to it. When a function
35 written in Lisp is called, the evaluator computes the value of the
36 function by evaluating the expressions in the function body. Thus,
37 running any Lisp program really means running the Lisp interpreter.
39 How the evaluator handles an object depends primarily on the data
45 A Lisp object that is intended for evaluation is called an
46 @dfn{expression} or a @dfn{form}. The fact that expressions are data
47 objects and not merely text is one of the fundamental differences
48 between Lisp-like languages and typical programming languages. Any
49 object can be evaluated, but in practice only numbers, symbols, lists
50 and strings are evaluated very often.
52 It is very common to read a Lisp expression and then evaluate the
53 expression, but reading and evaluation are separate activities, and
54 either can be performed alone. Reading per se does not evaluate
55 anything; it converts the printed representation of a Lisp object to the
56 object itself. It is up to the caller of @code{read} whether this
57 object is a form to be evaluated, or serves some entirely different
58 purpose. @xref{Input Functions}.
60 Do not confuse evaluation with command key interpretation. The
61 editor command loop translates keyboard input into a command (an
62 interactively callable function) using the active keymaps, and then
63 uses @code{call-interactively} to invoke the command. The execution of
64 the command itself involves evaluation if the command is written in
65 Lisp, but that is not a part of command key interpretation itself.
68 @cindex recursive evaluation
69 Evaluation is a recursive process. That is, evaluation of a form may
70 call @code{eval} to evaluate parts of the form. For example, evaluation
71 of a function call first evaluates each argument of the function call,
72 and then evaluates each form in the function body. Consider evaluation
73 of the form @code{(car x)}: the subform @code{x} must first be evaluated
74 recursively, so that its value can be passed as an argument to the
77 Evaluation of a function call ultimately calls the function specified
78 in it. @xref{Functions}. The execution of the function may itself work
79 by evaluating the function definition; or the function may be a Lisp
80 primitive implemented in C, or it may be a byte-compiled function
81 (@pxref{Byte Compilation}).
84 The evaluation of forms takes place in a context called the
85 @dfn{environment}, which consists of the current values and bindings of
86 all Lisp variables.@footnote{This definition of ``environment'' is
87 specifically not intended to include all the data that can affect the
88 result of a program.} Whenever a form refers to a variable without
89 creating a new binding for it, the value of the variable's binding in
90 the current environment is used. @xref{Variables}.
93 Evaluation of a form may create new environments for recursive
94 evaluation by binding variables (@pxref{Local Variables}). These
95 environments are temporary and vanish by the time evaluation of the form
96 is complete. The form may also make changes that persist; these changes
97 are called @dfn{side effects}. An example of a form that produces side
98 effects is @code{(setq foo 1)}.
100 The details of what evaluation means for each kind of form are
101 described below (@pxref{Forms}).
104 @section Kinds of Forms
106 A Lisp object that is intended to be evaluated is called a @dfn{form}.
107 How Emacs evaluates a form depends on its data type. Emacs has three
108 different kinds of form that are evaluated differently: symbols, lists,
109 and ``all other types''. This section describes all three kinds, one by
110 one, starting with the ``all other types'' which are self-evaluating
114 * Self-Evaluating Forms:: Forms that evaluate to themselves.
115 * Symbol Forms:: Symbols evaluate as variables.
116 * Classifying Lists:: How to distinguish various sorts of list forms.
117 * Function Indirection:: When a symbol appears as the car of a list,
118 we find the real function via the symbol.
119 * Function Forms:: Forms that call functions.
120 * Macro Forms:: Forms that call macros.
121 * Special Forms:: ``Special forms'' are idiosyncratic primitives,
122 most of them extremely important.
123 * Autoloading:: Functions set up to load files
124 containing their real definitions.
127 @node Self-Evaluating Forms
128 @subsection Self-Evaluating Forms
129 @cindex vector evaluation
130 @cindex literal evaluation
131 @cindex self-evaluating form
133 A @dfn{self-evaluating form} is any form that is not a list or symbol.
134 Self-evaluating forms evaluate to themselves: the result of evaluation
135 is the same object that was evaluated. Thus, the number 25 evaluates to
136 25, and the string @code{"foo"} evaluates to the string @code{"foo"}.
137 Likewise, evaluation of a vector does not cause evaluation of the
138 elements of the vector---it returns the same vector with its contents
143 '123 ; @r{A number, shown without evaluation.}
147 123 ; @r{Evaluated as usual---result is the same.}
151 (eval '123) ; @r{Evaluated ``by hand''---result is the same.}
155 (eval (eval '123)) ; @r{Evaluating twice changes nothing.}
160 It is common to write numbers, characters, strings, and even vectors
161 in Lisp code, taking advantage of the fact that they self-evaluate.
162 However, it is quite unusual to do this for types that lack a read
163 syntax, because there's no way to write them textually. It is possible
164 to construct Lisp expressions containing these types by means of a Lisp
165 program. Here is an example:
169 ;; @r{Build an expression containing a buffer object.}
170 (setq print-exp (list 'print (current-buffer)))
171 @result{} (print #<buffer eval.texi>)
176 @print{} #<buffer eval.texi>
177 @result{} #<buffer eval.texi>
182 @subsection Symbol Forms
183 @cindex symbol evaluation
185 When a symbol is evaluated, it is treated as a variable. The result
186 is the variable's value, if it has one. If it has none (if its value
187 cell is void), an error is signaled. For more information on the use of
188 variables, see @ref{Variables}.
190 In the following example, we set the value of a symbol with
191 @code{setq}. Then we evaluate the symbol, and get back the value that
209 The symbols @code{nil} and @code{t} are treated specially, so that the
210 value of @code{nil} is always @code{nil}, and the value of @code{t} is
211 always @code{t}; you cannot set or bind them to any other values. Thus,
212 these two symbols act like self-evaluating forms, even though
213 @code{eval} treats them like any other symbol. A symbol whose name
214 starts with @samp{:} also self-evaluates in the same way; likewise,
215 its value ordinarily cannot be changed. @xref{Constant Variables}.
217 @node Classifying Lists
218 @subsection Classification of List Forms
219 @cindex list form evaluation
221 A form that is a nonempty list is either a function call, a macro
222 call, or a special form, according to its first element. These three
223 kinds of forms are evaluated in different ways, described below. The
224 remaining list elements constitute the @dfn{arguments} for the function,
225 macro, or special form.
227 The first step in evaluating a nonempty list is to examine its first
228 element. This element alone determines what kind of form the list is
229 and how the rest of the list is to be processed. The first element is
230 @emph{not} evaluated, as it would be in some Lisp dialects such as
233 @node Function Indirection
234 @subsection Symbol Function Indirection
235 @cindex symbol function indirection
237 @cindex void function
239 If the first element of the list is a symbol then evaluation examines
240 the symbol's function cell, and uses its contents instead of the
241 original symbol. If the contents are another symbol, this process,
242 called @dfn{symbol function indirection}, is repeated until it obtains a
243 non-symbol. @xref{Function Names}, for more information about using a
244 symbol as a name for a function stored in the function cell of the
247 One possible consequence of this process is an infinite loop, in the
248 event that a symbol's function cell refers to the same symbol. Or a
249 symbol may have a void function cell, in which case the subroutine
250 @code{symbol-function} signals a @code{void-function} error. But if
251 neither of these things happens, we eventually obtain a non-symbol,
252 which ought to be a function or other suitable object.
254 @kindex invalid-function
255 @cindex invalid function
256 More precisely, we should now have a Lisp function (a lambda
257 expression), a byte-code function, a primitive function, a Lisp macro, a
258 special form, or an autoload object. Each of these types is a case
259 described in one of the following sections. If the object is not one of
260 these types, the error @code{invalid-function} is signaled.
262 The following example illustrates the symbol indirection process. We
263 use @code{fset} to set the function cell of a symbol and
264 @code{symbol-function} to get the function cell contents
265 (@pxref{Function Cells}). Specifically, we store the symbol @code{car}
266 into the function cell of @code{first}, and the symbol @code{first} into
267 the function cell of @code{erste}.
271 ;; @r{Build this function cell linkage:}
272 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
273 ;; | #<subr car> | <-- | car | <-- | first | <-- | erste |
274 ;; ------------- ----- ------- -------
280 (symbol-function 'car)
281 @result{} #<subr car>
292 (erste '(1 2 3)) ; @r{Call the function referenced by @code{erste}.}
297 By contrast, the following example calls a function without any symbol
298 function indirection, because the first element is an anonymous Lisp
299 function, not a symbol.
303 ((lambda (arg) (erste arg))
310 Executing the function itself evaluates its body; this does involve
311 symbol function indirection when calling @code{erste}.
313 The built-in function @code{indirect-function} provides an easy way to
314 perform symbol function indirection explicitly.
317 @defun indirect-function function
318 @anchor{Definition of indirect-function}
319 This function returns the meaning of @var{function} as a function. If
320 @var{function} is a symbol, then it finds @var{function}'s function
321 definition and starts over with that value. If @var{function} is not a
322 symbol, then it returns @var{function} itself.
324 This function signals a @code{void-function} error if the final
325 symbol is unbound and a @code{cyclic-function-indirection} error if
326 there is a loop in the chain of symbols.
328 Here is how you could define @code{indirect-function} in Lisp:
331 (defun indirect-function (function)
332 (if (symbolp function)
333 (indirect-function (symbol-function function))
339 @subsection Evaluation of Function Forms
340 @cindex function form evaluation
341 @cindex function call
343 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a Lisp function
344 object, byte-code object or primitive function object, then that list is
345 a @dfn{function call}. For example, here is a call to the function
352 The first step in evaluating a function call is to evaluate the
353 remaining elements of the list from left to right. The results are the
354 actual argument values, one value for each list element. The next step
355 is to call the function with this list of arguments, effectively using
356 the function @code{apply} (@pxref{Calling Functions}). If the function
357 is written in Lisp, the arguments are used to bind the argument
358 variables of the function (@pxref{Lambda Expressions}); then the forms
359 in the function body are evaluated in order, and the value of the last
360 body form becomes the value of the function call.
363 @subsection Lisp Macro Evaluation
364 @cindex macro call evaluation
366 If the first element of a list being evaluated is a macro object, then
367 the list is a @dfn{macro call}. When a macro call is evaluated, the
368 elements of the rest of the list are @emph{not} initially evaluated.
369 Instead, these elements themselves are used as the arguments of the
370 macro. The macro definition computes a replacement form, called the
371 @dfn{expansion} of the macro, to be evaluated in place of the original
372 form. The expansion may be any sort of form: a self-evaluating
373 constant, a symbol, or a list. If the expansion is itself a macro call,
374 this process of expansion repeats until some other sort of form results.
376 Ordinary evaluation of a macro call finishes by evaluating the
377 expansion. However, the macro expansion is not necessarily evaluated
378 right away, or at all, because other programs also expand macro calls,
379 and they may or may not evaluate the expansions.
381 Normally, the argument expressions are not evaluated as part of
382 computing the macro expansion, but instead appear as part of the
383 expansion, so they are computed when the expansion is evaluated.
385 For example, given a macro defined as follows:
390 (list 'car (list 'cdr x)))
395 an expression such as @code{(cadr (assq 'handler list))} is a macro
396 call, and its expansion is:
399 (car (cdr (assq 'handler list)))
403 Note that the argument @code{(assq 'handler list)} appears in the
406 @xref{Macros}, for a complete description of Emacs Lisp macros.
409 @subsection Special Forms
410 @cindex special form evaluation
412 A @dfn{special form} is a primitive function specially marked so that
413 its arguments are not all evaluated. Most special forms define control
414 structures or perform variable bindings---things which functions cannot
417 Each special form has its own rules for which arguments are evaluated
418 and which are used without evaluation. Whether a particular argument is
419 evaluated may depend on the results of evaluating other arguments.
421 Here is a list, in alphabetical order, of all of the special forms in
422 Emacs Lisp with a reference to where each is described.
426 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
429 @pxref{Catch and Throw}
435 @pxref{Handling Errors}
438 @pxref{Defining Variables}
441 @pxref{Defining Macros}
444 @pxref{Defining Functions}
447 @pxref{Defining Variables}
450 @pxref{Anonymous Functions}
456 @pxref{Interactive Call}
460 @pxref{Local Variables}
463 @pxref{Combining Conditions}
473 @item save-current-buffer
474 @pxref{Current Buffer}
479 @item save-restriction
482 @item save-window-excursion
483 @pxref{Window Configurations}
486 @pxref{Setting Variables}
489 @pxref{Creating Buffer-Local}
492 @pxref{Mouse Tracking}
495 @pxref{Nonlocal Exits}
500 @item with-output-to-temp-buffer
501 @pxref{Temporary Displays}
504 @cindex CL note---special forms compared
506 @b{Common Lisp note:} Here are some comparisons of special forms in
507 GNU Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp. @code{setq}, @code{if}, and
508 @code{catch} are special forms in both Emacs Lisp and Common Lisp.
509 @code{defun} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but a macro in Common
510 Lisp. @code{save-excursion} is a special form in Emacs Lisp, but
511 doesn't exist in Common Lisp. @code{throw} is a special form in
512 Common Lisp (because it must be able to throw multiple values), but it
513 is a function in Emacs Lisp (which doesn't have multiple
518 @subsection Autoloading
520 The @dfn{autoload} feature allows you to call a function or macro
521 whose function definition has not yet been loaded into Emacs. It
522 specifies which file contains the definition. When an autoload object
523 appears as a symbol's function definition, calling that symbol as a
524 function automatically loads the specified file; then it calls the real
525 definition loaded from that file. @xref{Autoload}.
531 The special form @code{quote} returns its single argument, as written,
532 without evaluating it. This provides a way to include constant symbols
533 and lists, which are not self-evaluating objects, in a program. (It is
534 not necessary to quote self-evaluating objects such as numbers, strings,
537 @defspec quote object
538 This special form returns @var{object}, without evaluating it.
541 @cindex @samp{'} for quoting
542 @cindex quoting using apostrophe
543 @cindex apostrophe for quoting
544 Because @code{quote} is used so often in programs, Lisp provides a
545 convenient read syntax for it. An apostrophe character (@samp{'})
546 followed by a Lisp object (in read syntax) expands to a list whose first
547 element is @code{quote}, and whose second element is the object. Thus,
548 the read syntax @code{'x} is an abbreviation for @code{(quote x)}.
550 Here are some examples of expressions that use @code{quote}:
567 @result{} (quote foo)
571 @result{} (quote foo)
575 @result{} [(quote foo)]
579 Other quoting constructs include @code{function} (@pxref{Anonymous
580 Functions}), which causes an anonymous lambda expression written in Lisp
581 to be compiled, and @samp{`} (@pxref{Backquote}), which is used to quote
582 only part of a list, while computing and substituting other parts.
587 Most often, forms are evaluated automatically, by virtue of their
588 occurrence in a program being run. On rare occasions, you may need to
589 write code that evaluates a form that is computed at run time, such as
590 after reading a form from text being edited or getting one from a
591 property list. On these occasions, use the @code{eval} function.
593 The functions and variables described in this section evaluate forms,
594 specify limits to the evaluation process, or record recently returned
595 values. Loading a file also does evaluation (@pxref{Loading}).
597 It is generally cleaner and more flexible to store a function in a
598 data structure, and call it with @code{funcall} or @code{apply}, than
599 to store an expression in the data structure and evaluate it. Using
600 functions provides the ability to pass information to them as
604 This is the basic function evaluating an expression. It evaluates
605 @var{form} in the current environment and returns the result. How the
606 evaluation proceeds depends on the type of the object (@pxref{Forms}).
608 Since @code{eval} is a function, the argument expression that appears
609 in a call to @code{eval} is evaluated twice: once as preparation before
610 @code{eval} is called, and again by the @code{eval} function itself.
621 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{foo}}
624 ;; @r{Here @code{eval} receives argument @code{bar}, which is the value of @code{foo}}
630 The number of currently active calls to @code{eval} is limited to
631 @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} (see below).
634 @deffn Command eval-region start end &optional stream read-function
635 @anchor{Definition of eval-region}
636 This function evaluates the forms in the current buffer in the region
637 defined by the positions @var{start} and @var{end}. It reads forms from
638 the region and calls @code{eval} on them until the end of the region is
639 reached, or until an error is signaled and not handled.
641 By default, @code{eval-region} does not produce any output. However,
642 if @var{stream} is non-@code{nil}, any output produced by output
643 functions (@pxref{Output Functions}), as well as the values that
644 result from evaluating the expressions in the region are printed using
645 @var{stream}. @xref{Output Streams}.
647 If @var{read-function} is non-@code{nil}, it should be a function,
648 which is used instead of @code{read} to read expressions one by one.
649 This function is called with one argument, the stream for reading
650 input. You can also use the variable @code{load-read-function}
651 (@pxref{Definition of load-read-function,, How Programs Do Loading})
652 to specify this function, but it is more robust to use the
653 @var{read-function} argument.
655 @code{eval-region} does not move point. It always returns @code{nil}.
658 @cindex evaluation of buffer contents
659 @deffn Command eval-buffer &optional buffer-or-name stream filename unibyte print
660 This is similar to @code{eval-region}, but the arguments provide
661 different optional features. @code{eval-buffer} operates on the
662 entire accessible portion of buffer @var{buffer-or-name}.
663 @var{buffer-or-name} can be a buffer, a buffer name (a string), or
664 @code{nil} (or omitted), which means to use the current buffer.
665 @var{stream} is used as in @code{eval-region}, unless @var{stream} is
666 @code{nil} and @var{print} non-@code{nil}. In that case, values that
667 result from evaluating the expressions are still discarded, but the
668 output of the output functions is printed in the echo area.
669 @var{filename} is the file name to use for @code{load-history}
670 (@pxref{Unloading}), and defaults to @code{buffer-file-name}
671 (@pxref{Buffer File Name}). If @var{unibyte} is non-@code{nil},
672 @code{read} converts strings to unibyte whenever possible.
674 @findex eval-current-buffer
675 @code{eval-current-buffer} is an alias for this command.
678 @defvar max-lisp-eval-depth
679 @anchor{Definition of max-lisp-eval-depth}
680 This variable defines the maximum depth allowed in calls to @code{eval},
681 @code{apply}, and @code{funcall} before an error is signaled (with error
682 message @code{"Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-depth"}).
684 This limit, with the associated error when it is exceeded, is one way
685 Emacs Lisp avoids infinite recursion on an ill-defined function. If
686 you increase the value of @code{max-lisp-eval-depth} too much, such
687 code can cause stack overflow instead.
688 @cindex Lisp nesting error
690 The depth limit counts internal uses of @code{eval}, @code{apply}, and
691 @code{funcall}, such as for calling the functions mentioned in Lisp
692 expressions, and recursive evaluation of function call arguments and
693 function body forms, as well as explicit calls in Lisp code.
695 The default value of this variable is 300. If you set it to a value
696 less than 100, Lisp will reset it to 100 if the given value is reached.
697 Entry to the Lisp debugger increases the value, if there is little room
698 left, to make sure the debugger itself has room to execute.
700 @code{max-specpdl-size} provides another limit on nesting.
701 @xref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local Variables}.
705 The value of this variable is a list of the values returned by all the
706 expressions that were read, evaluated, and printed from buffers
707 (including the minibuffer) by the standard Emacs commands which do
708 this. (Note that this does @emph{not} include evaluation in
709 @samp{*ielm*} buffers, nor evaluation using @kbd{C-j} in
710 @code{lisp-interaction-mode}.) The elements are ordered most recent
719 (list 'A (1+ 2) auto-save-default)
724 @result{} ((A 3 t) 1 @dots{})
728 This variable is useful for referring back to values of forms recently
729 evaluated. It is generally a bad idea to print the value of
730 @code{values} itself, since this may be very long. Instead, examine
731 particular elements, like this:
735 ;; @r{Refer to the most recent evaluation result.}
740 ;; @r{That put a new element on,}
741 ;; @r{so all elements move back one.}
746 ;; @r{This gets the element that was next-to-most-recent}
747 ;; @r{before this example.}
755 arch-tag: f723a4e0-31b3-453f-8afc-0bf8fd276d57