kernel - cleanup vfs_cache debugging
[dragonfly.git] / contrib / nvi2 / vi / v_undo.c
blob6cac736d9c5bf71550da779c9021b79e93a8d636
1 /*-
2 * Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
3 * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
4 * Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996
5 * Keith Bostic. All rights reserved.
7 * See the LICENSE file for redistribution information.
8 */
10 #include "config.h"
12 #ifndef lint
13 static const char sccsid[] = "$Id: v_undo.c,v 10.6 2001/06/25 15:19:36 skimo Exp $";
14 #endif /* not lint */
16 #include <sys/types.h>
17 #include <sys/queue.h>
18 #include <sys/time.h>
20 #include <bitstring.h>
21 #include <errno.h>
22 #include <limits.h>
23 #include <stdio.h>
24 #include <stdlib.h>
25 #include <string.h>
27 #include "../common/common.h"
28 #include "vi.h"
31 * v_Undo -- U
32 * Undo changes to this line.
34 * PUBLIC: int v_Undo(SCR *, VICMD *);
36 int
37 v_Undo(SCR *sp, VICMD *vp)
40 * Historically, U reset the cursor to the first column in the line
41 * (not the first non-blank). This seems a bit non-intuitive, but,
42 * considering that we may have undone multiple changes, anything
43 * else (including the cursor position stored in the logging records)
44 * is going to appear random.
46 vp->m_final.cno = 0;
49 * !!!
50 * Set up the flags so that an immediately subsequent 'u' will roll
51 * forward, instead of backward. In historic vi, a 'u' following a
52 * 'U' redid all of the changes to the line. Given that the user has
53 * explicitly discarded those changes by entering 'U', it seems likely
54 * that the user wants something between the original and end forms of
55 * the line, so starting to replay the changes seems the best way to
56 * get to there.
58 F_SET(sp->ep, F_UNDO);
59 sp->ep->lundo = BACKWARD;
61 return (log_setline(sp));
65 * v_undo -- u
66 * Undo the last change.
68 * PUBLIC: int v_undo(SCR *, VICMD *);
70 int
71 v_undo(SCR *sp, VICMD *vp)
73 EXF *ep;
75 /* Set the command count. */
76 VIP(sp)->u_ccnt = sp->ccnt;
79 * !!!
80 * In historic vi, 'u' toggled between "undo" and "redo", i.e. 'u'
81 * undid the last undo. However, if there has been a change since
82 * the last undo/redo, we always do an undo. To make this work when
83 * the user can undo multiple operations, we leave the old semantic
84 * unchanged, but make '.' after a 'u' do another undo/redo operation.
85 * This has two problems.
87 * The first is that 'u' didn't set '.' in historic vi. So, if a
88 * user made a change, realized it was in the wrong place, does a
89 * 'u' to undo it, moves to the right place and then does '.', the
90 * change was reapplied. To make this work, we only apply the '.'
91 * to the undo command if it's the command immediately following an
92 * undo command. See vi/vi.c:getcmd() for the details.
94 * The second is that the traditional way to view the numbered cut
95 * buffers in vi was to enter the commands "1pu.u.u.u. which will
96 * no longer work because the '.' immediately follows the 'u' command.
97 * Since we provide a much better method of viewing buffers, and
98 * nobody can think of a better way of adding in multiple undo, this
99 * remains broken.
101 * !!!
102 * There is change to historic practice for the final cursor position
103 * in this implementation. In historic vi, if an undo was isolated to
104 * a single line, the cursor moved to the start of the change, and
105 * then, subsequent 'u' commands would not move it again. (It has been
106 * pointed out that users used multiple undo commands to get the cursor
107 * to the start of the changed text.) Nvi toggles between the cursor
108 * position before and after the change was made. One final issue is
109 * that historic vi only did this if the user had not moved off of the
110 * line before entering the undo command; otherwise, vi would move the
111 * cursor to the most attractive position on the changed line.
113 * It would be difficult to match historic practice in this area. You
114 * not only have to know that the changes were isolated to one line,
115 * but whether it was the first or second undo command as well. And,
116 * to completely match historic practice, we'd have to track users line
117 * changes, too. This isn't worth the effort.
119 ep = sp->ep;
120 if (!F_ISSET(ep, F_UNDO)) {
121 F_SET(ep, F_UNDO);
122 ep->lundo = BACKWARD;
123 } else if (!F_ISSET(vp, VC_ISDOT))
124 ep->lundo = ep->lundo == BACKWARD ? FORWARD : BACKWARD;
126 switch (ep->lundo) {
127 case BACKWARD:
128 return (log_backward(sp, &vp->m_final));
129 case FORWARD:
130 return (log_forward(sp, &vp->m_final));
131 default:
132 abort();
134 /* NOTREACHED */