Fix the clang-wpa example.
[clang.git] / test / SemaCXX / copy-initialization.cpp
blobfb83dcfbd01761b5227dfdd43b5ddd22e339a1e0
1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
2 class X {
3 public:
4 explicit X(const X&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
5 X(int*); // expected-note 3{{candidate constructor}}
6 explicit X(float*); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
7 };
9 class Y : public X { };
11 void f(Y y, int *ip, float *fp) {
12 X x1 = y; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'X'}}
13 X x2 = 0;
14 X x3 = ip;
15 X x4 = fp; // expected-error{{no viable conversion}}
16 X x2a(0); // expected-error{{call to constructor of 'X' is ambiguous}}
17 X x3a(ip);
18 X x4a(fp);
21 struct foo {
22 void bar(); // expected-note{{declared here}}
25 // PR3600
26 void test(const foo *P) { P->bar(); } // expected-error{{'bar' not viable: 'this' argument has type 'const foo', but function is not marked const}}
28 namespace PR6757 {
29 struct Foo {
30 Foo();
31 Foo(Foo&); // expected-note{{candidate constructor not viable}}
34 struct Bar {
35 operator const Foo&() const;
38 void f(Foo);
40 void g(Foo foo) {
41 f(Bar()); // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying parameter of type 'const PR6757::Foo'}}
42 f(foo);