test/Index/code-complete-errors.c

   1 _Complex cd; // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:1:1: warning: plain '_Complex' requires a type specifier; assuming '_Complex double'
   2 // CHECK: FIX-IT: Insert " double" at 1:9
   3 struct s {
   4   int x, y;; // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:4:12: warning: extra ';' inside a struct
   5 }; // CHECK: FIX-IT: Remove [4:12 - 4:13]
   6
   7 struct s s0 = { y: 5 }; // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:7:20: warning: use of GNU old-style field designator extension
   8 // CHECK: FIX-IT: Replace [7:17 - 7:19] with ".y = "
   9 int f(int *ptr1, float *ptr2) {
  10   return ptr1 != ptr2; // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:10:15:{10:10-10:14}{10:18-10:22}: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('int *' and 'float *')
  11 }
  12
  13 #define expand_to_binary_function(ret, name, parm1, parm2, code) ret name(parm1, parm2) code
  14
  15 expand_to_binary_function(int, g, int *ip, float *fp, {
  16  // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:17:12:{17:9-17:24}: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses]
  17     if (ip = (float*)fp) ;
  18 // CHECK: code-complete-errors.c:19:15:{19:12-19:14}{19:18-19:20}: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('int *' and 'float *')
  19     return ip == fp;
  20   })
  21
  22 void g() {  }
  23
  24 // RUN: c-index-test -code-completion-at=%s:21:12 -pedantic %s 2> %t
  25 // RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK %s < %t