Key and Salt Option get blanked out after parsing options
[anytun.git] / internet-draft-satp.html
blob6c6a5c666a08889364a4a892019d6cc29c49f910
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
2 <html lang="en"><head><title>secure anycast tunneling protocol (SATP)</title>
3 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
4 <meta name="description" content="secure anycast tunneling protocol (SATP)">
5 <meta name="keywords" content="satp, Internet-Draft, secure anycast tunneling protocol, anycast, tunnel, secure, protocol">
6 <meta name="generator" content="xml2rfc v1.32 (http://xml.resource.org/)">
7 <style type='text/css'><!--
8 body {
9 font-family: verdana, charcoal, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;
10 font-size: small; color: #000; background-color: #FFF;
11 margin: 2em;
13 h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
14 font-family: helvetica, monaco, "MS Sans Serif", arial, sans-serif;
15 font-weight: bold; font-style: normal;
17 h1 { color: #900; background-color: transparent; text-align: right; }
18 h3 { color: #333; background-color: transparent; }
20 td.RFCbug {
21 font-size: x-small; text-decoration: none;
22 width: 30px; height: 30px; padding-top: 2px;
23 text-align: justify; vertical-align: middle;
24 background-color: #000;
26 td.RFCbug span.RFC {
27 font-family: monaco, charcoal, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, verdana, sans-serif;
28 font-weight: bold; color: #666;
30 td.RFCbug span.hotText {
31 font-family: charcoal, monaco, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, verdana, sans-serif;
32 font-weight: normal; text-align: center; color: #FFF;
35 table.TOCbug { width: 30px; height: 15px; }
36 td.TOCbug {
37 text-align: center; width: 30px; height: 15px;
38 color: #FFF; background-color: #900;
40 td.TOCbug a {
41 font-family: monaco, charcoal, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, sans-serif;
42 font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small; text-decoration: none;
43 color: #FFF; background-color: transparent;
46 td.header {
47 font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;
48 vertical-align: top; width: 33%;
49 color: #FFF; background-color: #666;
51 td.author { font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small; margin-left: 4em; }
52 td.author-text { font-size: x-small; }
54 /* info code from SantaKlauss at http://www.madaboutstyle.com/tooltip2.html */
55 a.info {
56 /* This is the key. */
57 position: relative;
58 z-index: 24;
59 text-decoration: none;
61 a.info:hover {
62 z-index: 25;
63 color: #FFF; background-color: #900;
65 a.info span { display: none; }
66 a.info:hover span.info {
67 /* The span will display just on :hover state. */
68 display: block;
69 position: absolute;
70 font-size: smaller;
71 top: 2em; left: -5em; width: 15em;
72 padding: 2px; border: 1px solid #333;
73 color: #900; background-color: #EEE;
74 text-align: left;
77 a { font-weight: bold; }
78 a:link { color: #900; background-color: transparent; }
79 a:visited { color: #633; background-color: transparent; }
80 a:active { color: #633; background-color: transparent; }
82 p { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; }
83 p.copyright { font-size: x-small; }
84 p.toc { font-size: small; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 3em; }
85 table.toc { margin: 0 0 0 3em; padding: 0; border: 0; vertical-align: text-top; }
86 td.toc { font-size: small; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: text-top; }
88 ol.text { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; }
89 ul.text { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; }
90 li { margin-left: 3em; }
92 /* RFC-2629 <spanx>s and <artwork>s. */
93 em { font-style: italic; }
94 strong { font-weight: bold; }
95 dfn { font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; }
96 cite { font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; }
97 tt { color: #036; }
98 tt, pre, pre dfn, pre em, pre cite, pre span {
99 font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace; font-size: small;
101 pre {
102 text-align: left; padding: 4px;
103 color: #000; background-color: #CCC;
105 pre dfn { color: #900; }
106 pre em { color: #66F; background-color: #FFC; font-weight: normal; }
107 pre .key { color: #33C; font-weight: bold; }
108 pre .id { color: #900; }
109 pre .str { color: #000; background-color: #CFF; }
110 pre .val { color: #066; }
111 pre .rep { color: #909; }
112 pre .oth { color: #000; background-color: #FCF; }
113 pre .err { background-color: #FCC; }
115 /* RFC-2629 <texttable>s. */
116 table.all, table.full, table.headers, table.none {
117 font-size: small; text-align: center; border-width: 2px;
118 vertical-align: top; border-collapse: collapse;
120 table.all, table.full { border-style: solid; border-color: black; }
121 table.headers, table.none { border-style: none; }
122 th {
123 font-weight: bold; border-color: black;
124 border-width: 2px 2px 3px 2px;
126 table.all th, table.full th { border-style: solid; }
127 table.headers th { border-style: none none solid none; }
128 table.none th { border-style: none; }
129 table.all td {
130 border-style: solid; border-color: #333;
131 border-width: 1px 2px;
133 table.full td, table.headers td, table.none td { border-style: none; }
135 hr { height: 1px; }
136 hr.insert {
137 width: 80%; border-style: none; border-width: 0;
138 color: #CCC; background-color: #CCC;
140 --></style>
141 </head>
142 <body>
143 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
144 <table summary="layout" width="66%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table summary="layout" width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1">
145 <tr><td class="header">Network Working Group</td><td class="header">O. Gsenger</td></tr>
146 <tr><td class="header">Internet-Draft</td><td class="header">June 21, 2007</td></tr>
147 <tr><td class="header">Expires: December 23, 2007</td><td class="header">&nbsp;</td></tr>
148 </table></td></tr></table>
149 <h1><br />secure anycast tunneling protocol (SATP)<br />draft-gsenger-secure-anycast-tunneling-protocol-00</h1>
151 <h3>Status of this Memo</h3>
153 By submitting this Internet-Draft,
154 each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which
155 he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed,
156 and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed,
157 in accordance with Section&nbsp;6 of BCP&nbsp;79.</p>
159 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
160 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.
161 Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as
162 Internet-Drafts.</p>
164 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
165 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time.
166 It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite
167 them other than as &ldquo;work in progress.&rdquo;</p>
169 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
170 <a href='http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt'>http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt</a>.</p>
172 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
173 <a href='http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html'>http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html</a>.</p>
175 This Internet-Draft will expire on December 23, 2007.</p>
177 <h3>Copyright Notice</h3>
179 Copyright &copy; The IETF Trust (2007).</p>
181 <h3>Abstract</h3>
183 <p>The secure anycast tunneling protocol (SATP) defines a protocol used for communication between any combination of unicast and anycast tunnel endpoints. It allows tunneling of every ETHER TYPE protocol (ethernet, ip ...). SATP directly includes cryptography and message authentication based on the methodes used by SRTP. It can be used as an encrypted alternative to <a class='info' href='#RFC2003'>IP Encapsulation within IP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Perkins, C., &ldquo;IP Encapsulation within IP,&rdquo; October&nbsp;1996.</span><span>)</span></a> [3] and <a class='info' href='#RFC2784'>Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)<span> (</span><span class='info'>Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., and P. Traina, &ldquo;Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2000.</span><span>)</span></a> [4]. It supports both anycast receivers and senders.
185 </p><a name="toc"></a><br /><hr />
186 <h3>Table of Contents</h3>
187 <p class="toc">
188 <a href="#anchor1">1.</a>&nbsp;
189 Introduction<br />
190 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor2">1.1.</a>&nbsp;
191 Notational Conventions<br />
192 <a href="#anchor3">2.</a>&nbsp;
193 Motivation and usage scenarios<br />
194 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor4">2.1.</a>&nbsp;
195 Usage scenarions<br />
196 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor5">2.1.1.</a>&nbsp;
197 Tunneling from unicast hosts over anycast routers to other unicast hosts<br />
198 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor6">2.1.2.</a>&nbsp;
199 Tunneling from unicast hosts to anycast networks<br />
200 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor7">2.1.3.</a>&nbsp;
201 Redundant tunnel connection of 2 networks<br />
202 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor8">2.2.</a>&nbsp;
203 Encapsulation<br />
204 <a href="#anchor9">3.</a>&nbsp;
205 Using SATP on top of IP<br />
206 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor10">3.1.</a>&nbsp;
207 Fragmentation<br />
208 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor11">3.2.</a>&nbsp;
209 ICMP messages<br />
210 <a href="#anchor12">4.</a>&nbsp;
211 Protocol specification<br />
212 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor13">4.1.</a>&nbsp;
213 Header format<br />
214 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor14">4.2.</a>&nbsp;
215 sender ID<br />
216 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor15">4.3.</a>&nbsp;
217 sequence number<br />
218 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor16">4.4.</a>&nbsp;
219 payload<br />
220 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor17">4.5.</a>&nbsp;
221 padding (OPTIONAL)<br />
222 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor18">4.6.</a>&nbsp;
223 padding count (OPTIONAL)<br />
224 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor19">4.7.</a>&nbsp;
225 payload type field<br />
226 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor20">4.7.1.</a>&nbsp;
227 MKI (OPTIONAL)<br />
228 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor21">4.7.2.</a>&nbsp;
229 authentication tag (RECOMMENDED)<br />
230 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor22">4.8.</a>&nbsp;
231 Encryption<br />
232 <a href="#anchor23">5.</a>&nbsp;
233 Security Considerations<br />
234 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#anchor24">5.1.</a>&nbsp;
235 Replay protection<br />
236 <a href="#anchor25">6.</a>&nbsp;
237 IANA Considerations<br />
238 <a href="#rfc.references1">7.</a>&nbsp;
239 References<br />
240 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.references1">7.1.</a>&nbsp;
241 Normative References<br />
242 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#rfc.references2">7.2.</a>&nbsp;
243 Informational References<br />
244 <a href="#rfc.authors">&#167;</a>&nbsp;
245 Author's Address<br />
246 <a href="#rfc.copyright">&#167;</a>&nbsp;
247 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements<br />
248 </p>
249 <br clear="all" />
251 <a name="anchor1"></a><br /><hr />
252 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
253 <a name="rfc.section.1"></a><h3>1.&nbsp;
254 Introduction</h3>
256 <p>SATP is a mixture of a generic encapsulation protocol like <a class='info' href='#RFC2784'>GRE<span> (</span><span class='info'>Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., and P. Traina, &ldquo;Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2000.</span><span>)</span></a> [4] and a secure tunneling protocol as <a class='info' href='#RFC2401'>IPsec<span> (</span><span class='info'>Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, &ldquo;Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,&rdquo; November&nbsp;1998.</span><span>)</span></a> [5] in tunnel mode. It can be used to build redundant virtual private network (VPN) connections. It supports peer to peer tunnels, where tunnel endpoints can be any combination of unicast, multicast or anycast hosts, so it defines a <a class='info' href='#RFC1546'>Host Anycast Service<span> (</span><span class='info'>Partridge, C., Mendez, T., and W. Milliken, &ldquo;Host Anycasting Service,&rdquo; November&nbsp;1993.</span><span>)</span></a> [6]. Encryption is done per packet, so the protocol is robust against packet loss and routing changes.
257 To save some header overhead it uses the encryption techniques of <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1].
259 </p>
260 <a name="anchor2"></a><br /><hr />
261 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
262 <a name="rfc.section.1.1"></a><h3>1.1.&nbsp;
263 Notational Conventions</h3>
265 <p>The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in <a class='info' href='#RFC2119'>RFC2119<span> (</span><span class='info'>Bradner, S., &ldquo;Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,&rdquo; March&nbsp;1997.</span><span>)</span></a> [2].
266 </p>
267 <a name="anchor3"></a><br /><hr />
268 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
269 <a name="rfc.section.2"></a><h3>2.&nbsp;
270 Motivation and usage scenarios</h3>
272 <p>This section gives an overview of possible usage scenarios. Please note, that the protocols used in the figures are only examples and that SATP itself does not care about either transport protocols or encapsulated protocols. Routing is not done by SATP and each implemetation MAY choose it's own way of doing this task (e.g. using functions provided by the operating system). SATP is used only to encapsulate and encrypt data.
273 </p>
274 <a name="anchor4"></a><br /><hr />
275 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
276 <a name="rfc.section.2.1"></a><h3>2.1.&nbsp;
277 Usage scenarions</h3>
279 <a name="anchor5"></a><br /><hr />
280 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
281 <a name="rfc.section.2.1.1"></a><h3>2.1.1.&nbsp;
282 Tunneling from unicast hosts over anycast routers to other unicast hosts</h3>
283 <br /><hr class="insert" />
284 <a name="tunnel_mode"></a>
286 <p>An example of SATP used to tunnel in a unicast client - anycast server model
287 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
288 --------- router -----------
290 unicast ------+---------- router ------------+------ unicast
291 host \ / host
292 --------- router -----------
294 unicast | encrypted | anycast | encrypted | unicast
295 tunnel | communication | tunnel | communication | tunnel
296 endpoint | using SATP | endpoint | using SATP | endpoint
297 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;1&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
299 <p>In this scenario the payload gets encapsuleted into a SATP packet by a unicast host and gets transmitted to one of the anycast routers. It than gets decapsulated by the router. This router makes a routing descision based on the underlying protocol and transmits a new SATP package to one or more unicast hosts depending on the routing descition.
300 </p>
301 <a name="anchor6"></a><br /><hr />
302 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
303 <a name="rfc.section.2.1.2"></a><h3>2.1.2.&nbsp;
304 Tunneling from unicast hosts to anycast networks</h3>
305 <br /><hr class="insert" />
306 <a name="open_tunnel_mode"></a>
308 <p>An example of SATP used to encrypt data between a unicast host and anycast networks
309 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
310 -------Router -+---- DNS Server
312 / --- 6to4 Router
314 unicast -------+----------Router --+--- DNS Server
315 host \ \
316 \ --- 6to4 Router
318 -------Router -+---- DNS Server
320 --- 6to4 Router
322 unicast | encrypted | anycast | plaintext
323 tunnel | communication | tunnel | anycast
324 endpoint | using SATP | endpoint | services
326 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;2&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
328 <p>When the unicast hosts wants to transmit data to one of the anycast DNS servers, it encapsulates the data and sends a SATP packet to the anycast address of the routers. The packet arrives at one of the routers, gets decapsulated and routed to the DNS server. This method can be used to tunnel between a clients and networks providing anycast services. It can also be used the other way to virtually locate a unicast service within anycasted networks.
329 </p>
330 <a name="anchor7"></a><br /><hr />
331 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
332 <a name="rfc.section.2.1.3"></a><h3>2.1.3.&nbsp;
333 Redundant tunnel connection of 2 networks</h3>
334 <br /><hr class="insert" />
335 <a name="connect_networks"></a>
337 <p>An example of SATP used to connect 2 networks
338 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
339 Router ----------- ---------------Router
340 / \ / \
341 Network - Router ------------x Network
342 A \ / \ / B
343 Router ----------- ---------------Router
345 | packets | packets | packets |
346 plaintext | get | take a | get | plaintext
347 packets | de/encrypted | random | de/encrypted | packets
348 |de/encapsulated| path |de/encapsulated|
350 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;3&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
352 <p>Network A has multiple routers, that act as gateway/tunnel endpoints to another network B. This is done to build a redundant encrypted tunnel connection between the two networks. All tunnel endpoints of network A share the same anycast address and all tunnel endpoints of network B share another anycast address. When a packet from network A gets transmitted to network B, it first arrives on one of network A's border routers. Which router is used is determined by network A's internal routing. This router encapsulates the package and sends it to the anycast address of the network B routers. The SATP packet arrives at one of network B's routers and gets decapsulated and routed to it's destination within network B.
353 </p>
354 <a name="anchor8"></a><br /><hr />
355 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
356 <a name="rfc.section.2.2"></a><h3>2.2.&nbsp;
357 Encapsulation</h3>
359 <p>SATP does not depend on which lower layer protocols is used, but this section gives an example of how packets could look like.
361 </p><br /><hr class="insert" />
362 <a name="transport_udp"></a>
364 <p>Examples of SATP used with different lower layer and payload protocols
365 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
366 +------+-----+-------------------------------+
367 | | | + ---------------+------ |
368 | IPv6 | UDP | SATP | Ethernet 802.3 | ... | |
369 | | | +----------------+-----+ |
370 +------+-----+-------------------------------+
372 Tunneling of Ethernet over UDP/IPv6
374 +------+-----+---------------------------+
375 | | | +------+-----+-----+ |
376 | IPv4 | UDP | SATP | IPv6 | UDP | RTP | |
377 | | | +------+-----+-----+ |
378 +------+-----+---------------------------+
380 Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP/IPv4 with RTP payload
382 +------+-------------------------------+
383 | | + ---------------+------ |
384 | IPv6 | SATP | Ethernet 802.3 | ... | |
385 | | +----------------+-----+ |
386 +------+-------------------------------+
388 Tunneling of Ethernet over IPv6
390 +------+---------------------------+
391 | | +------+-----+-----+ |
392 | IPv4 | SATP | IPv6 | UDP | RTP | |
393 | | +------+-----+-----+ |
394 +------+---------------------------+
396 Tunneling of IPv6 over IPv4 with RTP payload
397 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;4&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
399 <a name="anchor9"></a><br /><hr />
400 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
401 <a name="rfc.section.3"></a><h3>3.&nbsp;
402 Using SATP on top of IP</h3>
404 <a name="anchor10"></a><br /><hr />
405 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
406 <a name="rfc.section.3.1"></a><h3>3.1.&nbsp;
407 Fragmentation</h3>
410 The only way of fully supporting fragmentation would be to synchronise fragments between all anycast servers. This is considered to be too much overhead, so there are two non perfect solutions for these problems. Either fragmentation HAS TO be disabled or if not all fragments arrive at the same server the ip datagramm HAS TO be discarded. As routing changes are not expected to occure very frequently, the encapsulated protocol can do a retransmission and all fragments will arrive at the new server.
412 </p>
413 <p>If the payload type is IP and the ip headers's Don't Fragment (DF) bit is set, than the DF bit of the outer IP header HAS TO be set as well.
414 </p>
415 <a name="anchor11"></a><br /><hr />
416 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
417 <a name="rfc.section.3.2"></a><h3>3.2.&nbsp;
418 ICMP messages</h3>
420 <p>ICMP messages MUST be relayed according to <a class='info' href='#RFC2003'>rfc2003 section 4<span> (</span><span class='info'>Perkins, C., &ldquo;IP Encapsulation within IP,&rdquo; October&nbsp;1996.</span><span>)</span></a> [3]. This is needed for path MTU detection.
421 </p>
422 <a name="anchor12"></a><br /><hr />
423 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
424 <a name="rfc.section.4"></a><h3>4.&nbsp;
425 Protocol specification</h3>
427 <a name="anchor13"></a><br /><hr />
428 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
429 <a name="rfc.section.4.1"></a><h3>4.1.&nbsp;
430 Header format</h3>
431 <br /><hr class="insert" />
432 <a name="prot_header_table"></a>
434 <p>Protocol Format
435 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
436 0 1 2 3
437 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
438 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
439 | sequence number | |
440 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+ |
441 | sender ID # | |
442 +#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+ + |
443 | | .... payload ... | |
444 | |-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ |
445 | | padding (OPT) | pad count(OPT)| payload type | |
446 +#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+-+
447 | ~ MKI (OPTIONAL) ~ |
448 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
449 | : authentication tag (RECOMMENDED) : |
450 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
452 +- Encrypted Portion Authenticated Portion ---+
453 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;5&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
456 </p>
457 <a name="anchor14"></a><br /><hr />
458 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
459 <a name="rfc.section.4.2"></a><h3>4.2.&nbsp;
460 sender ID</h3>
462 <p>The sender ID is a 16 bit unsigned integer. It HAS TO be unique for every sender sharing the same anycast address
463 </p>
464 <a name="anchor15"></a><br /><hr />
465 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
466 <a name="rfc.section.4.3"></a><h3>4.3.&nbsp;
467 sequence number</h3>
469 <p>The sequence number is a 32 bit unsigned integer in network byte order. It starts with a random value and is increased by 1 for every sent packet. After the maximum value, it starts over from 0. This overrun causes the ROC to be increased.
470 </p>
471 <a name="anchor16"></a><br /><hr />
472 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
473 <a name="rfc.section.4.4"></a><h3>4.4.&nbsp;
474 payload</h3>
476 <p>A packet of the type payload type (e.g. an IP packet).
477 </p>
478 <a name="anchor17"></a><br /><hr />
479 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
480 <a name="rfc.section.4.5"></a><h3>4.5.&nbsp;
481 padding (OPTIONAL)</h3>
483 <p>Padding of max 255 octets.
484 None of the pre-defined encryption transforms uses any padding; for
485 these, the plaintext and encrypted payload sizes match exactly. Transforms are based on transforms of the SRTP protocol and these transforms might use the RTP padding format, so a RTP like padding is supported. If the padding count field is present, than the padding count field MUST be set to the padding lenght.
486 </p>
487 <a name="anchor18"></a><br /><hr />
488 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
489 <a name="rfc.section.4.6"></a><h3>4.6.&nbsp;
490 padding count (OPTIONAL)</h3>
492 <p>The number of octets of the padding field. This field is optional. It's presence is signaled by the key management and not by this protocol. If this field isn't present, the padding field MUST NOT be present as well.
493 </p>
494 <a name="anchor19"></a><br /><hr />
495 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
496 <a name="rfc.section.4.7"></a><h3>4.7.&nbsp;
497 payload type field</h3>
499 <p>The payload type field defines the payload protocol. ETHER TYPE protocol numbers are used. <a href='http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers'>See IANA assigned ethernet numbers</a> . The values 0000-05DC are reserverd and MUST NOT be used.
500 <br /><hr class="insert" />
501 <a name="prot_type_table"></a>
503 <p>Some examples for protocol types
504 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
506 0000 Reserved
507 .... Reserved
508 05DC Reserved
509 0800 Internet IP (IPv4)
510 6558 transparent ethernet bridging
511 86DD IPv6
512 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;6&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
515 <a name="anchor20"></a><br /><hr />
516 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
517 <a name="rfc.section.4.7.1"></a><h3>4.7.1.&nbsp;
518 MKI (OPTIONAL)</h3>
520 <p>The MKI (Master Key Identifier) is OPTIONAL and of configurable length. See <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP Section 3.1<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details
521 </p>
523 <a name="anchor21"></a><br /><hr />
524 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
525 <a name="rfc.section.4.7.2"></a><h3>4.7.2.&nbsp;
526 authentication tag (RECOMMENDED)</h3>
528 <p>The authentication tag is RECOMMENDED and of configurable length. It contains a cryptographic checksum of the sender ID, sequence number and the encrypted portion, but not of the MKI. On sender side encryption HAS TO be done before calculating the authentication tag. A receiver HAS TO calculate the authentication tag before decrypting the encrypted portion.
529 </p>
532 <a name="anchor22"></a><br /><hr />
533 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
534 <a name="rfc.section.4.8"></a><h3>4.8.&nbsp;
535 Encryption</h3>
537 <p>Encryption is done in the same way as for <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1]. This section will only discuss some small changes that HAVE TO be made. Please read <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP RFC3711 section 3-9<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details.
538 </p>
539 <p>The least significant bits of SSRC are replaced by the sender ID and the rest is filled with zeros. For the SRTP SEQ the 16 least significant bits of the SATP sequence number are used and the 16 most significant bits of the sequence number replace the 16 least significant bits of the SRTP ROC.
540 </p><br /><hr class="insert" />
541 <a name="srtp_vs_satp"></a>
543 <p>Difference between SRTP and SATP
544 </p><div style='display: table; width: 0; margin-left: 3em; margin-right: auto'><pre>
545 0 1 2 3
546 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
547 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
548 | SATP sequence number |
549 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
551 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
552 | SRTP ROC least significant | SRTP SEQ |
553 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
556 0 1 2 3
557 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
558 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
559 |0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0| SATP sender ID |
560 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
562 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
563 | SRTP SSRC |
564 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
565 </pre></div><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" align="center"><tr><td align="center"><font face="monaco, MS Sans Serif" size="1"><b>&nbsp;Figure&nbsp;7&nbsp;</b></font><br /></td></tr></table><hr class="insert" />
567 <a name="anchor23"></a><br /><hr />
568 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
569 <a name="rfc.section.5"></a><h3>5.&nbsp;
570 Security Considerations</h3>
572 <p>As SATP uses the same encrytion technics as <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1], it shares the same security issues. This section will only discuss some small changes. Please read <a class='info' href='#RFC3711'>SRTP RFC3711 section 9<span> (</span><span class='info'>Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP),&rdquo; March&nbsp;2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [1] for details.
573 </p>
574 <a name="anchor24"></a><br /><hr />
575 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
576 <a name="rfc.section.5.1"></a><h3>5.1.&nbsp;
577 Replay protection</h3>
579 <p>Replay protection is done by a replay list. Every anycast receiver has it's own replay list, which SHOULDN'T be syncronised, because of massive overhead. This leads to an additional possible attack. A attacker is able to replay a captured packet once to every anycast receiver. This attack is considered of be very unlikely, because multiple attack hosts in different loactions are needed to reach the seperate anycast receivers and the number of replays is limited to the count of receivers - 1. Such replays might also happen because of routing problems, so a payload protocol HAS TO be robust against a small number of duplicated packages. The window size and position HAS TO be syncronised between multible anycast receivers to limit this attack.
580 </p>
581 <a name="anchor25"></a><br /><hr />
582 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
583 <a name="rfc.section.6"></a><h3>6.&nbsp;
584 IANA Considerations</h3>
586 <p>The protocol is intended to be used on top of IP or on top of UDP (to be compatible with NAT routers), so UDP and IP protocol numbers have to be assiged by IANA.
587 </p>
588 <a name="rfc.references"></a><br /><hr />
589 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
590 <a name="rfc.section.7"></a><h3>7.&nbsp;
591 References</h3>
593 <a name="rfc.references1"></a><br /><hr />
594 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
595 <h3>7.1.&nbsp;Normative References</h3>
596 <table width="99%" border="0">
597 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3711">[1]</a></td>
598 <td class="author-text">Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3711.txt">The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)</a>,&rdquo; RFC&nbsp;3711, March&nbsp;2004.</td></tr>
599 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2119">[2]</a></td>
600 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:sob@harvard.edu">Bradner, S.</a>, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a>,&rdquo; BCP&nbsp;14, RFC&nbsp;2119, March&nbsp;1997 (<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2119.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2119.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr>
601 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2003">[3]</a></td>
602 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:perk@watson.ibm.com">Perkins, C.</a>, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2003.txt">IP Encapsulation within IP</a>,&rdquo; RFC&nbsp;2003, October&nbsp;1996 (<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2003.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2003.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr>
603 </table>
605 <a name="rfc.references2"></a><br /><hr />
606 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
607 <h3>7.2.&nbsp;Informational References</h3>
608 <table width="99%" border="0">
609 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2784">[4]</a></td>
610 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:dino@procket.com">Farinacci, D.</a>, <a href="mailto:tony1@home.net">Li, T.</a>, <a href="mailto:stan_hanks@enron.net">Hanks, S.</a>, <a href="mailto:dmm@cisco.com">Meyer, D.</a>, and <a href="mailto:pst@juniper.net">P. Traina</a>, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2784.txt">Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)</a>,&rdquo; RFC&nbsp;2784, March&nbsp;2000.</td></tr>
611 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2401">[5]</a></td>
612 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:kent@bbn.com">Kent, S.</a> and <a href="mailto:rja@corp.home.net">R. Atkinson</a>, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2401.txt">Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol</a>,&rdquo; RFC&nbsp;2401, November&nbsp;1998 (<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2401.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2401.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2401.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr>
613 <tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC1546">[6]</a></td>
614 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:craig@bbn.com">Partridge, C.</a>, <a href="mailto:tmendez@bbn.com">Mendez, T.</a>, and <a href="mailto:milliken@bbn.com">W. Milliken</a>, &ldquo;<a href="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1546.txt">Host Anycasting Service</a>,&rdquo; RFC&nbsp;1546, November&nbsp;1993.</td></tr>
615 </table>
617 <a name="rfc.authors"></a><br /><hr />
618 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
619 <h3>Author's Address</h3>
620 <table width="99%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
621 <tr><td class="author-text">&nbsp;</td>
622 <td class="author-text">Othmar Gsenger</td></tr>
623 <tr><td class="author-text">&nbsp;</td>
624 <td class="author-text">Puerstingerstr 32</td></tr>
625 <tr><td class="author-text">&nbsp;</td>
626 <td class="author-text">Saalfelden 5760</td></tr>
627 <tr><td class="author-text">&nbsp;</td>
628 <td class="author-text">AT</td></tr>
629 <tr><td class="author" align="right">Phone:&nbsp;</td>
630 <td class="author-text"></td></tr>
631 <tr><td class="author" align="right">Email:&nbsp;</td>
632 <td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:satp@gsenger.com">satp@gsenger.com</a></td></tr>
633 <tr><td class="author" align="right">URI:&nbsp;</td>
634 <td class="author-text"><a href="http://www.gsenger.com/satp/">http://www.gsenger.com/satp/</a></td></tr>
635 </table>
636 <a name="rfc.copyright"></a><br /><hr />
637 <table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc">&nbsp;TOC&nbsp;</a></td></tr></table>
638 <h3>Full Copyright Statement</h3>
639 <p class='copyright'>
640 Copyright &copy; The IETF Trust (2007).</p>
641 <p class='copyright'>
642 This document is subject to the rights,
643 licenses and restrictions contained in BCP&nbsp;78,
644 and except as set forth therein,
645 the authors retain all their rights.</p>
646 <p class='copyright'>
647 This document and the information contained herein are provided
648 on an &ldquo;AS IS&rdquo; basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR,
649 THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
650 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST
651 AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,
652 EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT
653 THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY
654 IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
655 PURPOSE.</p>
656 <h3>Intellectual Property</h3>
657 <p class='copyright'>
658 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
659 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
660 to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
661 described in this document or the extent to which any license
662 under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it
663 represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
664 such rights.
665 Information on the procedures with respect to
666 rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP&nbsp;78 and BCP&nbsp;79.</p>
667 <p class='copyright'>
668 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
669 assurances of licenses to be made available,
670 or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or
671 permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or
672 users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR
673 repository at <a href='http://www.ietf.org/ipr'>http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>.</p>
674 <p class='copyright'>
675 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention
676 any copyrights,
677 patents or patent applications,
678 or other
679 proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required
680 to implement this standard.
681 Please address the information to the IETF at <a href='mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org'>ietf-ipr@ietf.org</a>.</p>
682 <h3>Acknowledgment</h3>
683 <p class='copyright'>
684 Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by
685 the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).</p>
686 </body></html>