2 !== PROFILES.txt for Samba release 2.0.0-alpha6 19 Sep 1998
4 Contributors: Bruce Cook <BC3-AU@bigfoot.com>
5 Copyright (C) 1998 Bruce Cook
7 John Terpstra <samba-bugs@samba.anu.edu.au>
8 Copyright (C) 1998 John H. Terpstra
10 Wolfgang Ratzka <ratzka@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
11 Copyright (C) 1998 Wolfgang Ratzka
13 Created: April 11, 1998
14 Updated: April 11, 1998
16 Subject: User Profiles
17 ===========================================================================
19 From BC3-AU@bigfoot.com Sat Apr 11 13:36:05 1998
20 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 17:13:49 +1000
21 From: Bruce Cook <BC3-AU@bigfoot.com>
22 To: Multiple recipients of list <samba-ntdom@samba.anu.edu.au>
23 Subject: RE: A question about NT Domains
25 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
26 > On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Jean-Francois Micouleau wrote:
28 > > On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
30 > > > ah, then i need to explain better. two or more users have identical
31 > > > profiles. say only one user installs a program which adds additional keys
32 > > > into the registry. those keys, as i understand it, will *not* be removed
33 > > > from HKEY_LOCAL_USER when subsequent users log in.
37 > my experience is with Win95, but i expect the same for NT, and have been
38 > told that it is so by someone who runs NT admin training courses.
40 > > and why do you want to have one profile shared between multiples users ?
42 > you don't. how did you get that impression? i said multiple users with
43 > identical profiles, not multiple users sharing one profile.
45 In my experience with both Win95 and NT, is that the HKEY_LOCAL_USER information
46 is stored in USER.dat or NTuser.DAT for NT. ALL of this branch is in this file
47 and there is no overlap between any two users (Unless you have '95 set up
48 to use a single common profile).
50 [** lkcl: see jht's message for conditions under which an overlap can occur **]
52 The HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE branch is machine based, and shared by all users of that
56 [And now for a whole stack of caveats]
58 1. User start menu paths are not stored in the registry (obviously) they're
59 a directory structure that located by settings in HKEY_LOCAL_USER.
61 If you want start menues / desktop / favorites to be individual to a user
62 you must set up your user registry so these can be located individually.
63 The easiest tool to manage this is the policy editor.
65 2. When you log onto 'Doze 95, it has to find the user registry.
68 If you have specified a common profile, a "default user" USER.DAT is used.
70 If you have specified individualised profiles, then USER.DAT will be found
71 by the following formula:
73 1. if NET USE x: /HOME was used at startup, try for x:\USER.DAT (where
74 x: is any drive letter from A to Z.
75 if no USER.DAT is found go to step 3
77 2. if no home is specified in a mapping,
78 ...\windows\profiles\username\USER.DAT is used. If no USER.DAT exists
81 3. If neither of the previous two found a USER.DAT, then it will use
82 a prototype USER.DAT which it will later save to the above specified
83 path when the user logs out.
85 The interesting thing here is that the prototype USER.DAT used here
86 is actually a copy of the last USER.DAT used on this machine. (This
87 may be the effect that the original poster is seeing)
89 4. As discussed above the start menu and desktop are specified in the
90 registry contained within USER.DAT. When a new USER.DAT is created
91 from a prototype, new directories are created for the start menu and
92 desktop ACCORDING TO HOW THE COPIED PROTOTYPE DEFINES THEM.
94 So if the prototype USER.DAT says that start menu is in H:\Start Menu
95 but programs folder is C:\windows\start menu\programs, then the
96 H:\start menu will be created, and the existing machine programs
99 This means that is is important when creating roving profiles to get
100 your prototype USER.DAT and general user directory structure set up
101 exactly as you want it, and then make a copy of it that you know will
102 be safe from modification. When creating a new user you then copy
103 this prototype into the new user area, so that the new user doesn't
104 just inherit what the previous user had.
107 3. When you log onto 'Doze NT, it has to find the user registry.
110 NT is easier to see what's going on, but follows much the same rules as
111 '95. The big difference being that 'NT gets its profile location from
112 the login server when it's logged in. (On an NT system have a look at user
113 manager/user/profile - you will see that you can specify the user profile
114 path) Under NT3.51 this profile path was a path to NTuser.DAT, on 4.0 this
115 seems to be a path to a directory structure (haven't played with many NT4
118 I'm not sure how this works in samba, as I haven't yet tried the NT_DOM stuff
119 yet (Luke: I assume you have a keyword for this?)
121 [lkcl: nt workstations should look in exactly the same places for things on
122 samba or other SMB servers as they do on an NT server, as long as that
123 SMB server looks like NT. if anyone finds that something fails, alert
124 us on samba-bugs@samba.anu.edu.au and we'll look into it].
126 When an NT system find a user without a NTuser.DAT, it copies from a
127 prototype that it stores especially for this purpose, so while unlike '95
128 the user doesn't get whatever happened last on the machine, the user will
129 get a fairly minimalist configuration.
132 When a Win95 machine logs onto a Windows NT Domain the Win95 machine looks
133 for the presence of a file called Config.Pol in the following location:
134 \\"Authenticating Server"\NETLOGON
135 It reads this file and uses it to ammend both the desktop environment as well
136 as the file %WinDir%\Profiles\%USERNAME%\User.DAT. As with Windows NT, on log
137 out this file gets written back to the profile server into the %USERNAME%
138 directory in the profile share.
140 It is thus possible to share a common desktop profile between Windows NT and
145 4. There are a *LOT* of reasons that the 'doze machine might not find USER.DAT
146 and therefore default to a prototype.
148 1. Can't execute logon script & therefore no /HOME mapping (Most common)
149 .Make sure the script exists
150 .that you have your logon script set right
151 .Netlogon share must exist
152 .Protection/ownership of the script and share
154 2. no /HOME mapping in the logon script
156 3. no home path specified in /etc/smb.conf (Or no home mapping set
157 up for that user in NT's user manager)
159 4. Protection/ownership of the user directory
161 5. protection/ownership of USER.DAT
163 6. basic networking problems
164 .Is the networking available (Test it by manually mapping
165 to both the user share and netlogon share)
166 .Was the networking working during logon ?
168 7. Has it defaulted to a prototype, and then had you map the home
169 directory afterwards ? - This will result in the bad prototype
170 being written into the users home, and them being stuck with it,
171 (Just replace USER.DAT again)
176 When '95 is performing the logon script, the HKEY_LOCAL_USERS has
177 NOT been mapped from the USER.DAT. What has been mapped at this stage
178 is the prototype registry (last one used).
180 I assume the reason for this is that '95 is waiting for the logon
181 script to complete so that it can identify where the user's home
184 If at this point you attempt to do anything that uses the USER registry,
185 (installing something for example or reading something from the user
186 registry) you will actually be operating on the machine stored prototype
187 profile not the user profile. This means that nothing will realy
188 happen to the user setup (No menu items, no settings etc).
190 To get around this you can name a process in the "run once" entries in
191 the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE branch, and these "run once" processes will be
192 executed once the USER.DAT is loaded, and all the user directories are
199 is the key to getting your user profiles loaded from a server.
200 NET USE H: \\server\homes
201 Won't get it right without a lot of stuffing about.
203 Windoze '95 goes through a lot to bring you your user profile and
204 if anything goes wrong during this process, it will drop back to
205 using whatever profile was last used on the machine.
208 From samba@aquasoft.com.au Sat Apr 11 13:48:54 1998
209 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 09:34:08 +1000
210 From: Samba Bugs <samba@aquasoft.com.au>
211 To: Multiple recipients of list <samba-ntdom@samba.anu.edu.au>
212 Subject: Re: A question about NT Domains
214 Just for the sake of completeness I thought I'd add a bit to this.
215 Let's be clear about which files affect registry changes (or contents).
217 Under NT, open a command prompt interface:
218 cd %SystemRoot%\System32\config
221 The standard registry files are:
222 Default - all component default settings
223 System - all HKLM\System entries
224 Software - all HKLM\Software entries
225 Security - Domain/Machine releated User Rights & Privs.
226 SAM - the Security Access Manager database (ie:Passwords etc.)
229 The SAM and Security files are the only files that get synchronised between
230 Windows NT Domain Controllers.
233 These are used by EVERYTHING!!
235 When a user logs in the following files get checked:
236 1) \\"Authenticating Server"\NETLOGON\NTConfig.Pol
237 2) %SystemRoot%\Profiles\Policies\NTConfig.Pol
238 this one is a copy of the last NTConfig.Pol downloaded
239 from (1) above - if available.
240 3) %SystemRoot%\Policies\%UserName%\NTUser.DAT
243 The System Policy Editor on Windows NT can be used to create both the
244 Windows 95 "Config.Pol" file, as well as the Windows NT "NTConfig.Pol"
245 file. To create the Windows 95 policy file you MUST load the Windows 95
246 policy template BEFORE creating the Config.Pol file.
249 The later, is first obtained from a profile server if the User_Init_Info
250 passed from the Domain Logon Server specifies use of a roaming profile.
251 If item (3) does NOT exist and/or NO default profile is available one gets
252 created from the system default settings PLUS the last loaded file at item
255 The HKCU is always unique to the currently logged in user, BUT if the
256 currently logged in user is using a shared profile that has NOT been made
257 exclusive then on logout the HKCU will be written over the top of the
258 source files. That is why Mandatory profiles are essential when sharing a
261 On Sat, 11 Apr 1998, Wolfgang Ratzka wrote:
263 > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
265 > > my experience is with Win95, but i expect the same for NT, and have been
266 > > told that it is so by someone who runs NT admin training courses.
268 > On NT it is quite definitely not so. HKCU will always be loaded completely from
269 > the user's NTuser.dat file and unloaded again after logout.
270 > In fact HKCU is not a proper registry hive but a symbolic reference to the subkey of
271 > HKEY_USERS that corresponds to the current user. If more than one user
272 > is active on an NT machine (on plain vanilla NT this *is* possible if you have
273 > services running as a non-system user; on WinFrame or Hydra multiple users
274 > can be logged in) you will see several subkeys of HKU that correspond to
275 > the active users and don't interfere with each other.
277 > Of course some settings that a user can change do not go into the HKCU hive
278 > but into HKLM, most notably the screen resolution and the number of colours
279 > (you can use policies to prevent user's from changing these).
280 > Some applications put information that should go into HKCU into HKLM instead.
281 > (Hall of Shame: Netscape Communicator, Microsoft Office 97 [User dictionaries!]...).
282 > Others just use plain good old INI files in their program directory or even
283 > in \WINNT\SYSTEM32. Those changes will not be user specific but machine
284 > specific and those programs will cause trouble, when one tries to run them
285 > on WinFrame or Hydra... :-).
289 > Q: Will the next user inherit a previous user's additions
290 > to the HKCU registry hive?
291 > A: Quite definitely not.
296 > Q: Can a user foul up the configuration for the next user?
297 > A: Quite definitely yes!
299 See above. Yes, but not if correctly configured.
302 > Q: Is this discussion out of place on the samba-ntdom list?
305 Errr... Really? I think it is. Do we, or do we not, want to help people to
306 gain stable and dependable use of samba?
309 > Wolfgang Ratzka (dialing in from home)
312 John H Terpstra (Also from home!!!!)
314 =============================================================================
315 Further notes by Bruce Cook
317 Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 14:12:22 +1000
318 From: Bruce Cook <BC3-AU@bigfoot.com>
319 Subject: Re: Win95 / NT Profiles (was: RE: A question about NT Domains)
321 Ah yes I knew there was something I forgot.
322 here it is for completeness.
324 =============================================================================
326 When a user logs into a specific machine for the first time, they will be
327 told that they've never logged into the machine, and would they like to
328 store the user setting for future use.
330 If the user answers NO, they will be nagged about this every time they
331 log into the machine until they say YES. (How about it MS, could we
332 possible do something about this feature?)
334 When the user answers YES, thereafter upon logging out of the machine,
335 a copy of the user's profile is also written onto the machines local disk
338 When a user logs into a machine where his/her profile has previously been
339 saved, a comparison is made between the date of the profile copy kept on
340 the machine, and the date of the profile stored on the server. In theory
341 the server date should be later or the same.
343 If the local machine date is later than the server date, the client
344 machine will tell you the the settings on the local machine are more
345 recent than those of the server, and would you like to user them instead.
347 This occurs for a couple of reasons:
348 1. Server not available when the user logs out
349 2. Date mismatch between the server and the client
350 (I always use NET TIME \\server /SET /YES in my logon scripts)
353 Logging in with NO server available.
355 In some cases a client will want to log into a network with no server
356 available. (Portables away from the office, or a dead server)
358 This can only happen if the administrator has NOT set the machine to
359 give access only upon password verification from the server.
360 (If the admin has done this, it can be circumvented by restarting
361 the machine in safe mode, and running poledit, or regedit and
362 disabling that feature)
364 If you are able to log in while the server is unavailable, you have
366 1. Log in as a user that previously stored a profile
367 (The password won't have to match unless the machine
368 is set up to store passwords)
370 2. log in as the default user (bit the cancel button or escape key)
372 If you choose to use your profile stored on the local machine, there are
373 several things you should be wary of:
374 1. the profile stored on the machine will be a copy of the last
375 profile used when you logged into THAT machine. You may get
376 quite an old profile.
377 2. When you log out, that local profile is garunteed to be later
378 than the one on the server, and if the server is available, or
379 you later log into that machine when the server is available
380 you could overwrite the good server profile with a bogus profile.
384 I set portable computers up so that they don't use roaming profiles,
385 rather they have a single profile kept on the machine. This means
386 that a user has the same desktop look an feel regardless of where
387 they are. This follows the philosophy that laptops tend to be used