1 ;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using
2 ;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g.
5 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
8 ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
9 ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
12 ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
13 ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
14 ;;;; more information.
16 (cl:in-package
:cl-user
)
18 ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
20 ;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that
21 ;;; we actually export.
23 ;;; Return the debug arglist of the function object FUN as a list, or
24 ;;; punt with :UNKNOWN.
25 (defun get-arglist (fun)
26 (declare (type function fun
))
27 ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
28 (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun
)
29 (#.sb-vm
:simple-fun-header-widetag
30 (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun
))
31 (#.sb-vm
:closure-header-widetag
(get-arglist
32 (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun
)))
33 ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme
34 ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
36 ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
37 ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just
38 ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
39 ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
40 ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
43 (defun zoop (zeep &key beep
)
45 (assert (equal (get-arglist #'zoop
) '(zeep &key beep
)))
47 ;;; Check some predefined functions too.
49 ;;; (We don't know exactly what the arguments are, e.g. the first
50 ;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or
51 ;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct
52 ;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.)
53 (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym
) (get-arglist #'print
)
54 (assert (symbolp object-sym
))
55 (assert (eql &optional-sym
'&optional
))
56 (assert (symbolp stream-sym
)))
57 (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym
&rest-sym format-args-sym
)
58 (get-arglist #'format
)
59 (assert (symbolp dest-sym
))
60 (assert (symbolp control-sym
))
61 (assert (eql &rest-sym
'&rest
))
62 (assert (symbolp format-args-sym
)))
64 ;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the
65 ;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own),
66 ;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any
67 ;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call
68 ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere.
69 (defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs
&key
(allow-stunted nil
))
70 (labels ((args-equal (want real
)
73 ((eq '&rest
(car want
))
75 ((or (eq '?
(car want
)) (equal (car want
) (car real
)))
76 (args-equal (cdr want
) (cdr real
)))
82 ((error (lambda (condition)
83 ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
84 (let ((backtrace (progn
86 (member (caar frame-specs
)
87 (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list
)
91 (setf result condition
)
94 (print :missing-backtrace
)
97 ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
100 (unless (or (not spec
)
101 (and (equal (car spec
) (car frame
))
102 (args-equal (cdr spec
)
104 (print (list :mismatch spec frame
))
109 ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
110 ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
112 (let ((end (last backtrace
2)))
113 (unless (equal (caar end
)
114 (if *show-entry-point-details
*
115 '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl
::toplevel-init
)
116 'sb-impl
::toplevel-init
))
117 (print (list :backtrace-stunted
(caar end
)))
119 (return-from outer-handler
)))))
120 (funcall test-function
)))
123 (defvar *undefined-function-frame
*
125 '(#+(or x86 x86-64
) "bogus stack frame"
126 #-
(or x86 x86-64
) "undefined function"))
128 #-
(or alpha
) ; bug 346
129 ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
130 ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
131 ;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect
132 ;;; a stunted stack can result from the tail call variant.)
134 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
135 (#:undefined-function
42))
137 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
138 (#:undefined-function
42))
140 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
143 (assert (verify-backtrace
144 (lambda () (test #'optimized
))
145 (list *undefined-function-frame
*
146 (list '(flet test
) #'optimized
))))
148 ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
149 ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
151 (assert (verify-backtrace
152 (lambda () (test #'not-optimized
))
153 (list *undefined-function-frame
*
154 (list '(flet not-optimized
))
155 (list '(flet test
) #'not-optimized
)))))
158 ;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
159 ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
160 ;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
161 ;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
162 ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
163 ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
166 ;;; Disabling tail call elimination on this will probably ensure that
167 ;;; the return value (to the flet or the enclosing top level form) is
168 ;;; more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM with the current spaces on OS X.
169 ;;; Enabling it might catch other problems, so do it anyway.
171 (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination
174 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
177 (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
179 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized
))
181 (list '(flet test
) #'optimized
))))
182 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized
))
184 '((flet not-optimized
))
185 (list '(flet test
) #'not-optimized
)))))
187 #-
(or alpha
(and x86 linux
)) ; bug 61
190 (throw 'no-such-tag t
))
191 (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test
'((throw-test)))))
193 ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
198 (defun bt.1 (&key key
)
204 (defun bt.3 (&key
(key (oops)))
207 ;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen
208 (defun bt.4 (&optional opt
)
209 (list (error "error")))
211 (defun bt.5 (&optional
(opt (oops)))
215 (macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body
)
216 `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details
* ,bool
))
221 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key
))
222 '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt
.1) &rest
)))))
224 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key
))
229 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2
230 '(((sb-c::xep bt
.2) 0 ?
)))))
232 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.2
237 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
238 '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring
) 0 ?
)))))
240 (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
245 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3
246 '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt
.3) :key nil
)))))
248 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.3
249 '((bt.3 :key nil
)))))
251 ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR
253 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4
254 '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt
.4) ?
)))))
256 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.4
259 ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR
261 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5
262 '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt
.5))))))
264 (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt
.5
268 (quit :unix-status
104)