| commit | f4998609908e4926fc095ce97cb84b187294fd1d | |
| author | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | |
| Thu, 1 Feb 2024 22:23:53 +0000 (1 17:23 -0500) | ||
| committer | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | |
| Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:22:06 +0000 (1 22:22 -0500) | ||
| tree | dbb5fc97845831fc32c5fbe38da794a9d77a340f | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 0b786ff38ab398087820d91241e030a28c451df9 | commitdiff |
c++: no_unique_address and constexpr [PR112439]
Here, because we don't build a CONSTRUCTOR for an empty base, we were
wrongly marking the Foo CONSTRUCTOR as complete after initializing the Empty
member. Fixed by checking empty_base here as well.
PR c++/112439
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression): Check empty_base
before marking a CONSTRUCTOR readonly.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address15.C: New test.
Here, because we don't build a CONSTRUCTOR for an empty base, we were
wrongly marking the Foo CONSTRUCTOR as complete after initializing the Empty
member. Fixed by checking empty_base here as well.
PR c++/112439
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression): Check empty_base
before marking a CONSTRUCTOR readonly.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address15.C: New test.
| gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | diffblobblamehistory | |
| gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/no_unique_address15.C | [new file with mode: 0644] | blob |