| commit | d31415ba1989c3d51c536fbba6a976b527213e44 | |
| author | James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com> | |
| Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:32:30 +0000 (3 14:32 +0000) | ||
| committer | James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh@gcc.gnu.org> | |
| Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:32:30 +0000 (3 14:32 +0000) | ||
| tree | 938ca46d53efa36d4fa116565bd7af50c5effe0c | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | d4360477682363406d83d61bedcdfcfd6d7af488 | commitdiff |
Andrew pointed out that I did not document the new architecture extension flag I added for the RcPc extension.
Andrew pointed out that I did not document the new architecture extension
flag I added for the RcPc extension. This was intentional, as enabling the
rcpc extension does not change GCC code generation, and is just
an assembler flag. But for completeness, here is documentation for the
new option.
gcc/
2017-07-03 James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
* doc/invoke.texi (rcpc architecture extension): Document it.
From-SVN: r249923
Andrew pointed out that I did not document the new architecture extension
flag I added for the RcPc extension. This was intentional, as enabling the
rcpc extension does not change GCC code generation, and is just
an assembler flag. But for completeness, here is documentation for the
new option.
gcc/
2017-07-03 James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
* doc/invoke.texi (rcpc architecture extension): Document it.
From-SVN: r249923
| gcc/ChangeLog | diffblobblamehistory | |
| gcc/doc/invoke.texi | diffblobblamehistory |