1 ext4: fix online resize with very large inode tables
3 If a file system has a large number of inodes per block group, all of
4 the metadata blocks in a flex_bg may be larger than what can fit in a
5 single block group. Unfortunately, ext4_alloc_group_tables() in
6 resize.c was never tested to see if it would handle this case
7 correctly, and there were a large number of bugs which caused the
8 following sequence to result in a BUG_ON:
10 kernel bug at fs/ext4/resize.c:409!
13 [<ffffffff81256768>] ext4_flex_group_add+0x1448/0x1830
14 [<ffffffff81257de2>] ext4_resize_fs+0x7b2/0xe80
15 [<ffffffff8123ac50>] ext4_ioctl+0xbf0/0xf00
16 [<ffffffff811c111d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2dd/0x4b0
17 [<ffffffff811b9df2>] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50
18 [<ffffffff811c1371>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
19 [<ffffffff81676aa9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
20 code: c8 4c 89 df e8 41 96 f8 ff 44 89 e8 49 01 c4 44 29 6d d4 0
21 rip [<ffffffff81254fa1>] set_flexbg_block_bitmap+0x171/0x180
24 This can be reproduced with the following command sequence:
26 mke2fs -t ext4 -i 4096 /dev/vdd 1G
27 mount -t ext4 /dev/vdd /vdd
30 To fix this, we need to make sure the right thing happens when a block
31 group's inode table straddles two block groups, which means the
32 following bugs had to be fixed:
34 1) Not clearing the BLOCK_UNINIT flag in the second block group in
35 ext4_alloc_group_tables --- the was proximate cause of the BUG_ON.
37 2) Incorrectly determining how many block groups contained contiguous
38 free blocks in ext4_alloc_group_tables().
40 3) Incorrectly setting the start of the next block range to be marked
41 in use after a discontinuity in setup_new_flex_group_blocks().
43 Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
44 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
46 fs/ext4/resize.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
47 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
49 diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
50 index c5adbb3..69a6261 100644
51 --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
52 +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
53 @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static int ext4_alloc_group_tables(struct super_block *sb,
55 ext4_group_t last_group;
57 + __u16 uninit_mask = (flexbg_size > 1) ? ~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT : ~0;
59 BUG_ON(flex_gd->count == 0 || group_data == NULL);
61 @@ -266,7 +267,7 @@ next_group:
63 for (; src_group <= last_group; src_group++) {
64 overhead = ext4_group_overhead_blocks(sb, src_group);
67 last_blk += group_data[src_group - group].blocks_count;
70 @@ -280,8 +281,7 @@ next_group:
71 group = ext4_get_group_number(sb, start_blk - 1);
72 group -= group_data[0].group;
73 group_data[group].free_blocks_count--;
74 - if (flexbg_size > 1)
75 - flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= ~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT;
76 + flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= uninit_mask;
79 /* Allocate inode bitmaps */
80 @@ -292,22 +292,30 @@ next_group:
81 group = ext4_get_group_number(sb, start_blk - 1);
82 group -= group_data[0].group;
83 group_data[group].free_blocks_count--;
84 - if (flexbg_size > 1)
85 - flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= ~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT;
86 + flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= uninit_mask;
89 /* Allocate inode tables */
90 for (; it_index < flex_gd->count; it_index++) {
91 - if (start_blk + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group > last_blk)
92 + unsigned int itb = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group;
93 + ext4_fsblk_t next_group_start;
95 + if (start_blk + itb > last_blk)
97 group_data[it_index].inode_table = start_blk;
98 - group = ext4_get_group_number(sb, start_blk - 1);
99 + group = ext4_get_group_number(sb, start_blk);
100 + next_group_start = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group + 1);
101 group -= group_data[0].group;
102 - group_data[group].free_blocks_count -=
103 - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group;
104 - if (flexbg_size > 1)
105 - flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= ~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT;
107 + if (start_blk + itb > next_group_start) {
108 + flex_gd->bg_flags[group + 1] &= uninit_mask;
109 + overhead = start_blk + itb - next_group_start;
110 + group_data[group + 1].free_blocks_count -= overhead;
114 + group_data[group].free_blocks_count -= itb;
115 + flex_gd->bg_flags[group] &= uninit_mask;
116 start_blk += EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group;
119 @@ -620,7 +628,7 @@ handle_ib:
122 count = group_table_count[j];
123 - start = group_data[i].block_bitmap;
124 + start = (&group_data[i].block_bitmap)[j];