Don't have anchors like <a name="#telltale1">
[dc-seal.git] / professors / ritual_text.htm
bloba7fbfe0ca22181de3a1cee701ede7972324d007c
1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 transitional//EN"
3 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
4 <html lang="en" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
9 <head>
10 <title>The Ritual of a Bob Dylan Concert</title>
11 <base target="footnotes" href="ritual_of_a_bob_dylan_concert_.htm" />
12 <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/general.css" />
13 <link href="../css/articles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
14 </head>
16 <body>
17 <div id="content">
18 <h1>&quot;Going Through These Things Twice&quot; </h1>
19 <h1>The Ritual of a Bob Dylan Concert</h1>
20 <h2 class="author">Eyolf &Oslash;strem</h2>
21 <h2>Two Beginnings</h2>
22 <p class="center"><img src="kor.jpg" alt="kor.jpg (387534 bytes)" width="353" height="284" class="center" /></p>
23 <p class="center quote">&quot;Deus in adiutorium meum intende.&quot;</p>
24 <p class="center"><img src="3_bdparis02.jpg" alt="3115_BigBob.jpg (58952 bytes)" width="319" height="301" /></p>
25 <p class="quote center">&quot;Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen!
26 Would you please welcome Columbia Recording Artist Bob Dylan!&quot;</p>
27 <p class="greenbox"><a href="../sound/deus_dylan.mp3" target="_blank">Another beginning, in sound this time</a></p>
28 <p class="first">Why bring together these two sound clips?</p>
29 <p>In the case of the gregorian invitatory, we
30 &quot;know&quot; that this is about ritual, a Medieval liturgical ceremony. Likewise, the
31 &quot;good evening ladies and gentlemen&quot; thing is just as obviously an announcement
32 of a rock concert. So what do they have to do with each other? </p>
33 <p>The setting is of course different, but apart
34 from that, there are actually significant similarities between the two sound events. They
35 are both formalized ways, repeated exactly the same way every time, of introducing
36 communal actions that involve people in different roles that are more or less fixed. They
37 also involve an architectural space &#150; a room &#150; with certain specific
38 characteristics that are fitting or even necessary for the occasion, various props
39 necessary to complete the action, and they are both laden with meaning which goes beyond
40 the mere fulfillment of the action.</p>
41 <p>In other words: according to this description,
42 they can both be seen as introductions to rituals, as &quot;calls to worship&quot;, as it
43 were. That is: they are ways to focus everyone&lsquo;s attention on ritual and all that it
44 entails.</p>
45 <p>My point is not to say that a Dylan concert and a
46 medieval vespers service are <i>the same </i>kind of ritual, but rather to circle around
47 the double question: What will a ritualistic perspective add to the understanding of a
48 Dylan show? and vice versa: what may the application of this perspective on a Dylan show
49 add to the understanding of ritual? &#150; what is <i>really</i> ritual about a medieval
50 service; and what do we mean by <i>really ritual</i>?</p>
51 <h2>The External Similarites: Ceremony </h2>
52 <p class="first">It is not difficult (whether or not it is
53 meaningful, is a question to which I will return) to regard a Dylan show as a parallel to
54 a medieval church service. We&lsquo;ve already heard the invitatory. Since c. 1990 this
55 announcement, &quot;Ladies and gentlemen &#133;&quot;, has been repeated in exactly the
56 same way at just about every single concert &#150; to the extent that to the audience (or
57 congregation) it no longer is an announcement but an element belonging to the proper order
58 of things &#150; a liturgical item. <a href="footnotes_ritual.htm#[1]" target="footnotes">[1]</a>
59 But even what precedes the invitatory is fixed: the preparation of the hall with buckets
60 (literally) of Nag Champa incense, and portions of Aaron Copeland&lsquo;s Rodeo suite form
61 the sound system, while the audience (or congregation) fills up the venue; then house
62 lights off, invitatorium, and then &#150; then the show begins.</p>
63 <p>Even here there is a &quot;liturgy&quot;. A
64 common &#150; far too common &#150; phrase in reviews of Dylan shows is that he&lsquo;s so
65 unpredictable. A brief look at his setlists will reveal the opposite. A Dylan concert
66 always involves fixed and variable elements. During most of the 90s he always played All
67 Along the Watchtower as song #3, and other songs have had similarly fixed positions in the
68 ceremony over shorter or longer stretches of time. Then there is a group of songs that are
69 chosen among the songs that an &quot;average listener&quot; &#150; the ones who have three
70 or four Dylan albums at home &#150; would want to hear: Like A Rolling Stone, Blowin&lsquo;
71 in the Wind, Mr Tambourine Man etc. Finally, there is almost always one or two songs for
72 the die-hard fans: a rarely heard song from an obscure 80s album, an old hillbilly
73 standard or an unlikely cover song. All in all: a sequence of songs that could very well
74 be described in terms of the <i>ordinarium </i>and <i>proprium</i> of the medieval mass:
75 some songs that will be heard every night, like a Kyrie or a Credo, and others that belong
76 to the specific feast day, and which will make <i>that</i> particular show unique.</p>
77 <p>During all this, the celebrant(s) and the
78 congregation alike perform certain acts, well aware of their respective roles. A Dylan
79 concert is usually a seated thing (maybe due to the average age of his faithful
80 fans&#133;) but after c. 2/3 of the show, there is the so-called stage rush: the moment
81 when, as if on a given sign, the initiated rush to the front of the stage, to spend the
82 rest of the concert at the Master&lsquo;s feet &#150; as a latter day communion.
83 Post-concert talk within this group of people tends to bring up whether or not one got
84 eye-contact with his Bobliness (or &#150; as a second best &#150; with one of the guitar
85 players; Tony, the bass player, doesn&lsquo;t count, since he smiles all the time anyway). </p>
86 <h2>The Internal Similarities: Ideology </h2>
87 <p class="first">Dylan himself, then &#150; how does he relate to
88 all this? Ambiguously. This is mainly owing to the fact that he has a double role, being
89 both the celebrant <i>and</i> the object of veneration. On stage he acts with the
90 unemotionality of a celebrant who performs an office he knows goes beyond himself, thereby
91 underlining the &quot;objective&quot; character of the ceremony/concert, and downplaying
92 the personal: he hardly ever speaks on stage; he does move, but not with the normal
93 &quot;look-at-me&quot; gestures of your average rock star, but with quirky knee-bends,
94 looking like a cross between Elvis and a shy kid from Hibbing, Minnesota. He is just up
95 there, doing what he happens to do best: being &quot;just a song and dance man&quot; as he
96 expressed it - jokingly, but truthfully - in an interview in the mid-60s.</p>
97 <p>At the same time, he is well aware that every
98 movement he makes is being monitored and interpreted by 7,000 pairs of eyes. One of his
99 more mysterious songs, <i>Dark Eyes </i>(1985) ends with the phrase &quot;A million faces
100 at my feet, and all I see are dark eyes&quot;, most easily interpreted as the
101 performer&lsquo;s reflection on how idolization looks from the idol&lsquo;s side. But two
102 other phrases in the song opens up for the possibility to regard the whole song as
103 something heard from high up on a cross: &quot;A cock is crowing far away and another
104 soldier's deep in prayer&quot;. &quot;The French girl, she's in paradise&quot; &#150; a
105 possible allusion to the thief on the cross. </p>
106 <p>During his career Dylan has related himself to
107 this duality in different ways. Let me just point to three examples.</p>
108 <h3>The Rolling Thunder Review</h3>
109 <p class="first">During the late 1975 and the early 1976 Dylan
110 with friends went on the road with a show that was called the <i>Rolling Thunder Revue</i>.
111 The grand idea behind the tour was that it was supposed to be a never-ending touring
112 circus, where the artists on the bill would change all the time. The revue would also be
113 self-served with sound equipment etc. so that they could make landfall here and there
114 without much prior planning, and without having to go through the administrative treadmill
115 of managers, concert organizers etc. In this perspective, the RTR was an expression of
116 Dylan&lsquo;s wish to be nothing out of the ordinary, just another musician, at any time
117 replaceable with any other member of this creative community.</p>
118 <p><img src="isis.gif" width="307" height="375"
119 alt="isis.gif (171837 bytes)" align="right" vspace="2" hspace="10" />One striking element of
120 these concerts was the use of masks and facial painting. Dylan would frequently come on
121 stage with his face painted white. A powerful scene from one of the concerts shows Dylan
122 holding his hands crossed in front of him, as an incantation. In other words: the concerts
123 involved a play with symbols of various kinds, symbols that are easily associated with
124 religious ritual, but without a clear symbolic background in the specific context in which
125 they were used. The gestures thus appear as signs removed from a sign system that can
126 render them understandable (which, on the other hand, does not preclude that they can
127 still be <i>meaningful</i>). A similar element is the quasi-religious connections made
128 throughout the tour to settings such as Gypsy mythology and Indian shamanism, etc.</p>
129 <p>All this is closely related to the fact that
130 these concerts weren&lsquo;t <i>just </i>concerts, and the band wasn&lsquo;t <i>just </i>a
131 group of musicians. Dylan had brought a film crew on the road, and just about everything
132 that happened, on stage and behind it (and behind the tour bus), was filmed. The outcome
133 of this was the 4 hours long <em>cinema verit&eacute;</em> opus <i>Renaldo and Clara</i>, which
134 was released in 1978. The film itself was an immediate failure. Be that as it may, the
135 meaning of the actions on stage go beyond that of a rock concert. The movie, the songs
136 that were newly written before the tour, as well as the &quot;drama&quot; that was
137 enacted, brought up the &quot;eternal questions&quot;: love, death, marriage, divorce,
138 violence, trust, children, identity. This is enacted in a meta-narrative taking place both
139 on stage and in some sort of reality, but lines between the world as lived and the world
140 as enacted <a href="footnotes_ritual.htm#[1b">[1b]</a> are blurred &#150; every statement
141 takes on a meaning which goes beyond the statement itself, because it belongs in all the
142 different contexts at the same time: both in the &quot;real&quot; and in the
143 &quot;transcendent&quot; media-/hyper-reality.</p>
144 <h3>The Gospel Years</h3>
145 <p class="first">Three years later, Dylan &quot;went
146 Christian&quot;. During the years 1979&#150;1981, when Dylan was associated with the
147 extreme evangelical Vineyard Fellowship in Tarzana, CA, and only performed new songs,
148 filled with evangelization and images of end-time apocalypse. The concerts from his
149 born-again period may, paradoxically enough, serve as a contrasting example to the RTR.
150 During the &quot;gospel years&quot; he made a direct connection with christian ritual, by
151 virtually turning his concerts into Christian services. In a way, however, this is the
152 period which is the least intersting from a ritual perspective, precisely for this reason:
153 the message was over-explicit, in the well-established tradition of evangelical preaching
154 &#150; there was little left of the transcendental message of the earlier tour, only a
155 message <em>about </em>the transcendental, which is a completely different thing.</p>
156 <h3>The Voice of a Generation</h3>
157 <p class="first">The eptithet that has stuck most stubbornly to
158 Dylan throughout the decades is probably that of &quot;the Voice of a Generation&quot;.
159 The man who said things that many felt. The religious importance of this may be gauged
160 from the reactions when he stopped saying what at least some of his followers wanted him
161 to say, not primarily by &quot;going electric&quot;, but by leaving out the political
162 message from his songs. But in fact, he has always claimed to be uninterested in politics:
163 &quot;I&lsquo;m just into langauge. I pick up what&lsquo;s in the air, what&lsquo;s on
164 people&lsquo;s minds&quot; (Interview with Elliot Landy, Woodstock 1968).</p>
165 <p>Implicit in this, and in the examples above, is a
166 notion of the artist as a medium, as someone with special gifts who is thereby able to
167 pick up wisdom where others just see everyday reality &#150; the answer is blowin&lsquo; in
168 the wind.</p>
169 <p>One might ask: what is the character of this
170 wisdom? And, again, the answer is dual, even the answers Dylan himself has given. On the
171 one hand, he sees himself as just any other guy who goes to work with what he&lsquo;s best
172 at: &quot;Basically, I&lsquo;m just a regular person. I don&lsquo;t walk around all the time
173 out of my mind with inspiration. So what can I tell you about that?&quot; (<em>Rolling Stone</em>,
174 Nov 22, 2001). Just a song-and-dance man, indeed.</p>
175 <p>In an interview from 1978, where Dylan comments
176 upon <i>Renaldo and Clara,</i> we find this discussion about what he wants to do or not:</p>
178 <p class="quote">D: Let&lsquo;s say you have a
179 message: white is white. Bergman would say &quot;white is white&quot; in the space of an
180 hour &#150; or what seems to be an hour. Bunuel might say &quot;white is black and black
181 is white, but white is really white&quot;. And it&lsquo;s all really the same message.<br />
182 Interviewer: And how would Dylan say it?<br />
183 D: Dylan would probably not even say it. He&lsquo;d assume you&lsquo;d know that.</p>
186 <p class="first">If this is a way of saying that he does not have a &quot;profound&quot; message, Dylan
187 has at the same time &#150; at least in periods &#150; had a quite clear image of himself
188 as someone with a special gift. He comments upon a statment from Woody Guthrie, that all
189 the songs are already written, floating around in the universe, ready to be picked up:
190 &quot;In a certain sense, there is a great deal of veracity to that&quot; (MOJO feb.
191 1998). He uses a similar phrase to describe his own writing of <i>Desolation Row</i>: </p>
192 <p class="quote">BD: I don&lsquo;t know how it was
193 done.<br />
194 Kurt Loder: It just came to you?<br />
195 BD: It just came out through me.</p>
197 <p class="first">Concerning his currently, since 1988 ongoing
198 tour, he describes its origin in terms of a religious experience on stage: </p>
199 <p class="quote">
200 &quot;It&lsquo;s almost like I
201 heard it as a voice. &#133; <i>I&lsquo;m determined to stand, whether God will deliver me
202 or not</i>. And all of a sudden everything just exploded. &#133; After that is when I sort
203 of knew: I&lsquo;ve got to go out and play these songs&quot; (<em>Newsweek</em> Oct 13, 1997). </p>
204 <p class="first">And further:</p>
206 <p class="quote">&quot;I don&lsquo;t feel like what I do qualifies
207 to be called a career. It&lsquo;s more of a calling&quot;. (RS, Nov 22, 2001) </p>
208 <p class="quote">&quot;I don&lsquo;t get bored singing the songs
209 because they have a truth to them. They have a life to them &#133; I don&lsquo;t think
210 there is anybody playing the type of songs that we&lsquo;re playing.&quot; (MOJO feb 1998). </p>
211 <p class="quote">&quot;I told you &quot;The Times They Are
212 a'Changing&quot; and they did. I said the answer was &quot;Blowin' in the Wind&quot; and
213 it was. I'm telling you now Jesus is coming back, and He is! &quot; (Concert rap,
214 Albuquerque, Dec 5 1979)</p>
215 <p class="quote">&quot;I don't think I'm gonna be really
216 understood until maybe 100 years from now. What I've done, what I'm doing, nobody else
217 does or has done.&quot; (Jul 1 1984)</p>
218 <h2>&quot;Secular Religiosity&quot; </h2>
219 <p class="first">Is it a relevant term to use about this, to say
220 that Dylan is seen &#150; both by himself and by his audience &#150; as a secular prophet
221 for a modern world? This would in turn imply a notion of &quot;secular religion&quot;, but
222 what is that, if at all anything?</p>
223 <p>In the present context, I would point out at
224 least three areas where such a concept would be meaningful in ways that at least
225 approximate that of religious services. One is the notion of a transcendental truth,
226 revealed and administered by the artistic medium. This function is the prerequisite of the
227 other two: that of creating a community and a sense of connection, and that of serving as
228 the &quot;soundtrack of our lives&quot;, to fall back on a clich&eacute; often used about Dylan
229 &#150; as that which defines our identity as historical beings, that through which our
230 experiences are anchored to the continuum of societal time. The validity of the two latter
231 functions ultimately hinges on the experience that what the man is saying is right, and
232 &#150; possibly &#150; relevant and important for one&lsquo;s life.</p>
233 <p>Even here, there&lsquo;s an ambiguity inherent in
234 it. The strong status of the truth of this revelation stands in stark contrast with the
235 contents of the revealed &quot;truth&quot; itself: &quot;Don&lsquo;t follow leaders&quot;,
236 &quot;You don&lsquo;t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows&quot; etc. In an
237 interview from 1984, these two opposing approaches appear in the same part of the
238 discussion: </p>
239 <p class="quote">I mean, if I didn&lsquo;t have
240 anything different to say to people, then what would be the point of it? </p>
241 <p class="quote">[ . . . ]</p>
242 <p class="quote">anybody who expects anything from me is just a
243 borderline case [ . . . ] You can&lsquo;t keep on depending on one person to give you
244 everything.</p>
245 <p class="first">Apart from the logical sophistry that can be
246 performed on this &#150; which addressee does he have in mind who could in any way listen
247 to the message without by necessity violating it? <a href="footnotes_ritual.htm#[2]">[2] </a>&#150;
248 this is also an indication of the &quot;ritual&quot; aspect of these songs, at least as
249 part of his current live repertory: their effect is partly based upon the assumption that
250 words that were laid down a long time ago, can transcend their own historical situation,
251 and can even transmit an esoteric, or at least &quot;deeper&quot; meaning, which goes
252 beyond the words themselves and the acts of performing and listening to them.&nbsp; </p>
253 <p>In all these areas it is possible to regard Dylan
254 in the light of medieval representational liturgy &#150; as the one around whom a
255 community forms and through whom the community partakes in the revelation.</p>
256 <p>What makes it particularly relevant to bring up
257 this in a medievalistic context, beyond the loose analogy of cultural phenomena, is the
258 setting in which this is presented: the concert genre. This way of presenting music has in
259 itself firm roots back to medieval ritual. The polyphonic mass of the late Middle Ages,
260 the <i>Abendmusiken</i> and the church recitals in seventeenth-century protestant cities,
261 and, last but not least, the cult of the genius in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries,
262 are all practices where it is hard to draw sharp lines between the religious and secular
263 functions of the music &#150; between worship and enjoyment.</p>
264 <p>What comes in addition to this general aspect of <i>Kunstreligion</i>
265 inherent in the concert genre itself, is the bringing together of this tradition with
266 popular culture, in its two incarnations, as folk culture and mass culture. Dylan &#150;
267 along with other artists &#150; has started over again, so to speak: from a genre which
268 was originally functional in a way similar to medieval ritual music, only fulfilling other
269 functions, such as dance music, the &quot;news reports&quot; of a folk ballad, or the pure
270 entertainment, has evolved a new concert genre where, at least to some extent, the music
271 is the carrier of the &quot;real&quot; message, in a way that is comparable to the
272 aestheticization of the functional mass music in the fifteenth century.</p>
273 <p>This is a genre that spans the whole continuum
274 from mindless entertainment &#150; even the commercial mass appeal, as evidenced by the
275 blatant advertisment of the Columbia Recording Company in the &quot;invitatory&quot;
276 &#150; to the deepest seriousness, which encompasses meaningfulness, world view and
277 ideology. A Dylan audience is usually very quiet, hanging on to every word that comes from
278 the stage. But there is also dancing in the aisles, and visits to the bar (and,
279 consequently, to the restroom) by the less faithful. Thus, a Dylan concert has fundamental
280 similarities with, but also differences from, e.g. a Britney Spears concert, in that it
281 takes it <i>raison d&lsquo;&eacute;tre</i> (as a genre) from the common understanding that
282 something is offered which goes beyond entertainment. The action carries a level of
283 meaning which transcends the surface level of the action.</p>
284 <p>&nbsp;
286 </p>
287 <h2>Ite, missa est</h2>
288 <p class="first">We can now return to the question implied in the
289 introduction: <i>is</i> a Dylan show <i>&quot;really&quot;</i> a ritual?</p>
290 <p>The ambiguities I have pointed to in connection
291 with Dylan correspond with a fundamental ambiguity in the lexical definition of ritual.
292 The latin word <i>ritus</i> has two different meanings. The first definition is relatively
293 unproblematic in relation to a medieval service: <i>the form and manner of religious
294 observances; a religious usage</i> or <i>ceremony</i>, <i>a rite</i>. But when we talk
295 about ritual today, we usually mean more than that: various ritual scholars have
296 emphasised things like the connection with myth and the way ritual and myth consitute the
297 world view of a culture. And in everyday language, just about any action that is repeated
298 the same way every time, and where the way it is done is ascribed some kind of meaning,
299 can be called a ritual. This corresponds with the second definition: <i>a custom</i>, <i>usage</i>,
300 <i>manner</i>, <i>mode</i>, <i>way</i>. Ritual, then, is no longer a religious term.</p>
301 <p>It would be difficult to claim that a Dylan show
302 entails religious observance &#150; there are no ontological overtones, no dogmatics, no
303 &quot;theology&quot; (or &quot;bobology&quot;).<a href="footnotes_ritual.htm#[3]">[3]</a>
304 But still, the fact that surprisingly many people lead their lives, make their choices in
305 life and form their outlook on life in accordance with what Dylan says, does, sings, means
306 &#150; not just by nodding symphathetically to the words of his songs, but in more
307 profound ways &#150; indicates an approach that borders on the religious.</p>
308 <p>Mutatis mutandis &#150; and with no further
309 comparison &#150; the anthropologist Diana Smay has suggested that the dramatic rise in
310 cases of obsessive compulsive disorder over the past fifty year or so, may be related to
311 the abandonment of traditional &#150; religious &#150; forms of ritual in the Western
312 civilization. I&lsquo;m not sure if I subscribe to her entire line of argument, in
313 particular her suggestion of a biological basis for ritual behavior seems problematic. But
314 apart from that, her overall approach to the question of ritual is intriguing.</p>
315 <p>Dylan fandom ranges from the deep appreciation of
316 a musical and lyrical artistic production, to the almost religious obsession with
317 everything that is related to him. But both extremes imply both the sense of community
318 created by repeated, communal activities, and the resonance of one&lsquo;s own experiences
319 with expressions &#150; musical, literary or others &#150; that have acquired a canonical
320 status.</p>
321 <p>If these three criteria &#150; community, iterativity and canonicity
322 &#150; together with the ascription of meaning of a kind that goes beyond what actions are
323 actually taking place, in any way comes close to a modern understanding of what
324 constitutes a ritual, and an understanding which can also be applied to medieval religious
325 ceremonies, then there is certainly a connection between the two, despite the distance in
326 time and the obvious differences. </p>
327 <p>And the attempt to &quot;find out what price / we have to pay to get
328 out of / going through all these things twice&quot;, to borrow an expression from <i>Stuck
329 inside of Mobile with the Memphis Blues Again</i>, may indeed be contrary to the
330 &quot;meaning&quot; of Dylan shows as ritual. Going through things twice, one necessary
331 condition of ritual, is something I personally am looking forward to do (in this
332 particular case, anyway), as many times as I will be offered the opportunity. </p>
333 </div>
334 </body>
335 </html>