| commit | 57b330cc8334015f9953d7fb82a30afc82d2a471 | |
| author | Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus@random-state.net> | |
| Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:33:57 +0000 (30 10:33 +0000) | ||
| committer | Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus@random-state.net> | |
| Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:33:57 +0000 (30 10:33 +0000) | ||
| tree | 4ba58efc9cf0d50eb15802efc0a4770efe32f5f1 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 05e9b542c5700416b8fd9f3ba9bb91bb6ab84b3a | commitdiff |
1.0.18.7: just one POWER-OF-TWO-CEILING, thank you
* We had two, of which CEIL-POWER-OF-TWO with arguments that already
were powers of two returned the *next* power of two, and not the
argument, whereas POWER-OF-TWO-CEILING returned the argument if
it already was a power of two.
As far as I can tell returning the argument is fine in those case
in places where CEIL-POWER-OF-TWO was used, so replace it with
POWER-OF-TWO-CEILING -- which really doesn't have to be inline.
* We had two, of which CEIL-POWER-OF-TWO with arguments that already
were powers of two returned the *next* power of two, and not the
argument, whereas POWER-OF-TWO-CEILING returned the argument if
it already was a power of two.
As far as I can tell returning the argument is fine in those case
in places where CEIL-POWER-OF-TWO was used, so replace it with
POWER-OF-TWO-CEILING -- which really doesn't have to be inline.