From 0f1f25dc2dee91f6c68335cd53f5506c0068e886 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christophe Rhodes Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:23:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 0.pre8.35: Just sync my BUGS file --- BUGS | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ version.lisp-expr | 2 +- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index 38748d985..607ff00bf 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -1220,6 +1220,18 @@ WORKAROUND: compiler gets its hands on the code needing compilation from the REPL, it has been macroexpanded several times. + A symptom of the same underlying problem, reported by Tony Martinez: + * (handler-case + (with-input-from-string (*query-io* " no") + (yes-or-no-p)) + (simple-type-error () 'error)) + ; in: LAMBDA NIL + ; (SB-KERNEL:FLOAT-WAIT) + ; + ; note: deleting unreachable code + ; compilation unit finished + ; printed 1 note + 241: "DEFCLASS mysteriously remembers uninterned accessor names." (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25) In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing @@ -1240,6 +1252,19 @@ WORKAROUND: rather than writing the sequence in one go, leading to severe performance degradation. +243: "STYLE-WARNING overenthusiasm for unused variables" + (observed from clx compilation) + In sbcl-0.7.14, in the presence of the macros + (DEFMACRO FOO (X) `(BAR ,X)) + (DEFMACRO BAR (X) (DECLARE (IGNORABLE X)) 'NIL) + somewhat surprising style warnings are emitted for + (COMPILE NIL '(LAMBDA (Y) (FOO Y))): + ; in: LAMBDA (Y) + ; (LAMBDA (Y) (FOO Y)) + ; + ; caught STYLE-WARNING: + ; The variable Y is defined but never used. + DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS IR1-#: These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter. diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr index d2dd18e4e..7e7b90985 100644 --- a/version.lisp-expr +++ b/version.lisp-expr @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".) -"0.pre8.34" +"0.pre8.35" -- 2.11.4.GIT