| commit | b0bced75d3a3e50a99cf39864539d57314d12eac | |
| author | Douglas Katzman <dougk@google.com> | |
| Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:40:06 +0000 (5 09:40 -0500) | ||
| committer | Douglas Katzman <dougk@google.com> | |
| Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:40:06 +0000 (5 09:40 -0500) | ||
| tree | afc15985e1293c93dd4586c60b2b75b0c9b4162e | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 23259d191d778d7d01fd96afced8303654948c8c | commitdiff |
Remove obsolete comment, added in change 4c5a011c
OUTPUT-NUMBER never existed and likely never will.
Note also that OUTPUT-FOO functions are in general authoritative for ugly [sic]
output only. In contrast, OUTPUT-OBJECT *decides* whether to print prettily.
If for whatever reason you had a dispatch entry for BIGNUM, it's probably wrong
to call a specialized numeric printer in lieu of the pretty method if pretty=T.
OUTPUT-NUMBER never existed and likely never will.
Note also that OUTPUT-FOO functions are in general authoritative for ugly [sic]
output only. In contrast, OUTPUT-OBJECT *decides* whether to print prettily.
If for whatever reason you had a dispatch entry for BIGNUM, it's probably wrong
to call a specialized numeric printer in lieu of the pretty method if pretty=T.
| src/code/print.lisp | diffblobblamehistory |