migration/rdma: Fix out of order wrid

migration/rdma: Fix out of order wrid

destination:
../qemu/build/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -netdev tap,id=hn0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup,downscript=/etc/qemu-ifdown -device e1000,netdev=hn0,mac=50:52:54:00:11:22 -boot c -drive if=none,file=./Fedora-rdma-server-migration.qcow2,id=drive-virtio-disk0 -device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -device piix3-usb-uhci -device usb-tablet -monitor stdio -vga qxl -spice streaming-video=filter,port=5902,disable-ticketing -incoming rdma:192.168.22.23:8888
qemu-system-x86_64: -spice streaming-video=filter,port=5902,disable-ticketing: warning: short-form boolean option 'disable-ticketing' deprecated
Please use disable-ticketing=on instead
QEMU 6.0.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu) trace-event qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid_miss on
(qemu) dest_init RDMA Device opened: kernel name rxe_eth0 uverbs device name uverbs2, infiniband_verbs class device path /sys/class/infiniband_verbs/uverbs2, infiniband class device path /sys/class/infiniband/rxe_eth0, transport: (2) Ethernet
qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid_miss A Wanted wrid CONTROL SEND (2000) but got CONTROL RECV (4000)

source:
../qemu/build/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -netdev tap,id=hn0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup,downscript=/etc/qemu-ifdown -device e1000,netdev=hn0,mac=50:52:54:00:11:22 -boot c -drive if=none,file=./Fedora-rdma-server.qcow2,id=drive-virtio-disk0 -device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -device piix3-usb-uhci -device usb-tablet -monitor stdio -vga qxl -spice streaming-video=filter,port=5901,disable-ticketing -S
qemu-system-x86_64: -spice streaming-video=filter,port=5901,disable-ticketing: warning: short-form boolean option 'disable-ticketing' deprecated
Please use disable-ticketing=on instead
QEMU 6.0.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
(qemu)
(qemu) trace-event qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid_miss on
(qemu) migrate -d rdma:192.168.22.23:8888
source_resolve_host RDMA Device opened: kernel name rxe_eth0 uverbs device name uverbs2, infiniband_verbs class device path /sys/class/infiniband_verbs/uverbs2, infiniband class device path /sys/class/infiniband/rxe_eth0, transport: (2) Ethernet
(qemu) qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid_miss A Wanted wrid WRITE RDMA (1) but got CONTROL RECV (4000)

NOTE: we use soft RoCE as the rdma device.
[root@iaas-rpma images]# rdma link show rxe_eth0/1
link rxe_eth0/1 state ACTIVE physical_state LINK_UP netdev eth0

This migration could not be completed when out of order(OOO) CQ event occurs.
The send queue and receive queue shared a same completion queue, and
qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() will drop the CQs it's not interested in. But
the dropped CQs by qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() could be later CQs it wants.
So in this case, qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() will block forever.

OOO cases will occur in both source side and destination side. And a
forever blocking happens on only SEND and RECV are out of order. OOO between
'WRITE RDMA' and 'RECV' doesn't matter.

below the OOO sequence:
       source                             destination
      rdma_write_one()                   qemu_rdma_registration_handle()
1.    S1: post_recv X                    D1: post_recv Y
2.    wait for recv CQ event X
3.                                       D2: post_send X     ---------------+
4.                                       wait for send CQ send event X (D2) |
5.    recv CQ event X reaches (D2)                                          |
6.  +-S2: post_send Y                                                       |
7.  | wait for send CQ event Y                                              |
8.  |                                    recv CQ event Y (S2) (drop it)     |
9.  +-send CQ event Y reaches (S2)                                          |
10.                                      send CQ event X reaches (D2)  -----+
11.                                      wait recv CQ event Y (dropped by (8))

Although a hardware IB works fine in my a hundred of runs, the IB specification
doesn't guaratee the CQ order in such case.

Here we introduce a independent send completion queue to distinguish
ibv_post_send completion queue from the original mixed completion queue.
It helps us to poll the specific CQE we are really interested in.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>