target/ppc: Move VPRTYB[WDQ] to decodetree and use gvec

target/ppc: Move VPRTYB[WDQ] to decodetree and use gvec

Moved VPRTYBW and VPRTYBD to use gvec and both of them and VPRTYBQ to
decodetree. VPRTYBW and VPRTYBD now also use .fni4 and .fni8,
respectively.

vprtybw:
rept    loop    master             patch
8       12500   0,01198900         0,00703100 (-41.4%)
25      4000    0,01070100         0,00571400 (-46.6%)
100     1000    0,01123300         0,00678200 (-39.6%)
500     200     0,01601500         0,01535600 (-4.1%)
2500    40      0,03872900         0,05562100 (43.6%)
8000    12      0,10047000         0,16643000 (65.7%)

vprtybd:
rept    loop    master             patch
8       12500   0,00757700         0,00788100 (4.0%)
25      4000    0,00652500         0,00669600 (2.6%)
100     1000    0,00714400         0,00825400 (15.5%)
500     200     0,01211000         0,01903700 (57.2%)
2500    40      0,03483800         0,07021200 (101.5%)
8000    12      0,09591800         0,21036200 (119.3%)

vprtybq:
rept    loop    master             patch
8       12500   0,00675600         0,00667200 (-1.2%)
25      4000    0,00619400         0,00643200 (3.8%)
100     1000    0,00707100         0,00751100 (6.2%)
500     200     0,01199300         0,01342000 (11.9%)
2500    40      0,03490900         0,04092900 (17.2%)
8000    12      0,09588200         0,11465100 (19.6%)

I wasn't expecting such a performance lost in both VPRTYBD and VPRTYBQ,
I'm not sure if it's worth to move those instructions. Comparing the
assembly of the helper with the TCGop they are pretty similar, so
I'm not sure why vprtybd took so much more time.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Mateus Castro (alqotel) <lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20221019125040.48028-6-lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>