| commit | c60caf8086247afbfbf0673993d809d348238ef6 | |
| author | John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> | |
| Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:08 +0000 (14 19:00 -0500) | ||
| committer | Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> | |
| Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:01:14 +0000 (23 13:01 +0100) | ||
| tree | aa73ac61c28514f8fb721ab11ee83b6fcf5f804a | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 885ecdbec9da62ede8019fc74f9154215e410aee | commitdiff |
qapi: Add minor typing workaround for 3.6
Pylint under 3.6 does not believe that Collection is subscriptable at
runtime. It is, making this a Pylint
bug. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/2377
They closed it as fixed, but that doesn't seem to be true as of Pylint
2.13.9, the latest version you can install under Python 3.6. 2.13.9 was
released 2022-05-13, about seven months after the bug was closed.
The least-annoying fix here is to just use the concret type.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230215000011.1725012-4-jsnow@redhat.com>
[Dumbed down from Sequence[str] to List[str], commit message adjusted]
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Pylint under 3.6 does not believe that Collection is subscriptable at
runtime. It is, making this a Pylint
bug. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/2377
They closed it as fixed, but that doesn't seem to be true as of Pylint
2.13.9, the latest version you can install under Python 3.6. 2.13.9 was
released 2022-05-13, about seven months after the bug was closed.
The least-annoying fix here is to just use the concret type.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230215000011.1725012-4-jsnow@redhat.com>
[Dumbed down from Sequence[str] to List[str], commit message adjusted]
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
| scripts/qapi/expr.py | diffblobblamehistory |